Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: nautilus-sendto-gajim
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Dimitur Kirov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://trac.gajim.org/wiki/NautilusSendtoIntegration
* License : GPL
Description : Plugin to send files from Na
The new version of Gossip (0.11.1) has a feature which I consider
quite useful: when a contact becomes online, a notification message
appears with a small button "Chat" and something like a clock which
represents the timeout for disappearing the message.
It is very convenient when you wait for som
Yann Le Boulanger wrote:
>
> we already have that since some releases. just install dbus and
> libnotify and this will work in Gajim too:
I have libnotify/notification-daemon and I get notification pop-ups,
but there are no buttons to press on the notification window (Debian
testing, Gajim 0.10,
Dimitur Kirov wrote:
>
> There is no exact HIG for notifications and each application brings its
> own understanding. Maybe this is the main problem.
Yeah, this caused the confusion. Yann wrote me off-list that clicking
on the notification window is what I have to do. I feel dumb now :/
Sorry
Chris Cook wrote:
>
> http://www.intraplanar.net/temp/google_emoticons.tar.gz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src$ LANG=C wget
http://www.intraplanar.net/temp/google_emoticons.tar.gz
--16:06:14-- http://www.intraplanar.net/temp/google_emoticons.tar.gz
=> `google_emoticons.tar.gz'
Resolving www.i
im (which depends on the licence, but also on the developers'
decision), some of us prefer to use free software and free data only.
> On 6/18/06, Yavor Doganov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 16:06:14 ERROR 403: Forbidden.
>
> I see what the problem is now. My CMS requires
Davidson Rodrigues Paulo wrote:
>
> PS.: sorry for any English error, it's not my native language, and I
> don't speak English very well...
The only error you've made is calling the operating system "Linux".
To support the principles and ideals of the Free Software Movement,
please call it "Slack
Davidson Rodrigues Paulo wrote:
>
> That means "no"?
I should have clarified that I'm not a Gajim Developer, so I have
absolutely no authority for taking any kind of decisions in the Gajim
Project. I'm merely a list subscriber as you are.
Please await the response of an official developer.
--
Nikos Kouremenos wrote:
>
> Make your suggesstions please
Gajim
The freedom to chat
Gajim
Free speech and chat for GNOME
Gajim
Towards freedom and jabberization
___
Gajim-devel mailing list
Gajim-devel@gajim.org
https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinf
James Newton wrote:
>
> +#include
> +#include
If there's a way NOT to use CoreFoundation and Core* in principle, by
all means please try to. It is not implemented in GNUstep (yet).
Some time ago I spent few restless nights trying to port AbiWord's
MuckOS port to GNUstep and failed miserably m
Thomas Prochaska wrote:
>
> because of the lack of an real good terminal jabber client
This is my impression as well, with the exception of jabber.el, which
is quite good and actively developed (actually my default client at
home where it's not healthy to run Gajim). But I guess it's not an
opt
James Newton wrote:
>
> If you know of a way to support both OS/X and GNUstep then I will
> help out from my side.
99% of the GNUstep apps run on OS/X and on all platforms that GNUstep
supports (all variants of GNU, *BSD, Windows and proprieatary Unix
variants). So basically porting an applicati
These files are under "GPLv2 only":
scripts/gajim.in
scripts/gajim-remote.in
src/lastfm_track_listener.py
This is not allowed, as their license is incompatible with the license
of the package as a whole.
These files do not have copyright notices:
src/groups.py
src/gtkspellmodule.c
src/negotiati
At Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:43:10 +0200,
Yann Leboulanger wrote:
>
> Ok we'll fixe all that as described in the ticket you opened.
Thanks, it looks that you've already done that in SVN trunk (apart
from the images/sounds).
BTW, I also noticed some files of borrowed code which contained
| Released un
Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
>
> You shouldn't include 0.11 under ANY circumstances, as it is far more
> buggy than 0.12. With 0.11, you lose messages, have dead connections,
> etc. It's absolutely a "do not want".
Interesting. 0.11.4 will be in Debian Lenny, maintained by Yann.
TTBOMK and user
Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
>
> If you don't believe me, look at the patches
Of course I believe you.
It was surprising to me to label 0.11.4 as utterly broken and
unsuitable for release. Debian Lenny (the next stable release that is
about to become reality soon) will ship with namely this versi
At Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:07:47 +0100,
aste...@gajim.org wrote:
>
> Author: asterix
> Date: 2008-12-16 21:07:47 +0100 (Tue, 16 Dec 2008)
> New Revision: 10863
>
> Removed:
>branches/gajim_0.12/po/br.po
>branches/gajim_0.12/po/el.po
>branches/gajim_0.12/po/nl.po
>branches/gajim_0.12/p
Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
>
> No translation is better than a wrong and unmtaintained translation.
Really? Unmaintained translations just accumulate more fuzzy and
untranslated strings, which are *not* displayed at runtime. So
basically, you are removing all translated strings that should be
co
Yann Leboulanger wrote:
>
> That's true, but from a user point of view, having a 40% completed
> translation is very unpleasant.
This is certainly only your opinion. Why impose your view to all
users? Let every user decide -- if it's unpleasant and annoying,
there are various ways for the end u
Yann Leboulanger wrote:
>
> I could return you this argument.
No, that is not equivalent, really.
> (no, don't ask users to remove a po file, or set environment
> variables for Gajim, it's not user friendly)
How is setting an environment variable (or a wrapper created only with
a few clicks) le
[I submitted this as a Trac ticket, but got "Submission rejected due
to potential spam" or similar.]
I believe Gajim is currently not distributable, as even an optional
dependency on python-openssl requires the license of Gajim to have the
(in)famous OpenSSL exception. Although PyOpenSSL is under
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 02:48:45PM +0100, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> We do not ship with py-OpenSSL.
> We do not include any of the code from py-OpenSSL.
I never said you did.
> I don't see where we are violating any license.
You are violating your own license, the GPL.
> OpenSSL is loaded at
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 03:08:57PM +0100, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
>> I never said you did.
>
> Then I fail to see the problem.
The problem is the linking. You can't link a GPL'ed application against
a library under incompatible license, unless it classifies as a "system
library".
> We only c
Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> You can, if you are not DISTRIBUTING the result of the linking. The
> linkage occurs at run time, so unless you distribute, say, a core
> dump, nothing happens – the GNU GPL is not triggered.
TTBOMK the actual linkage against shared libraries always happens at
run time.
>
Yann Leboulanger wrote:
> We are not linked against anything as in a C program,
Correct, you are in fact linking against C libraries (for the Gajim C
modules), but not in this case. The GPL is not exclusively for C
programs and is not void for interpreted programs. The mechanism via
which you us
At Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:24:52 +0100,
Yann Leboulanger wrote:
> The only reply I got from fsf is an unofficial answer from a
> non-lawyer.
That's the only reply you'll get unless you hire a lawyer. "This is
not a legal advice" is a standard disclaimer given even by lawyers,
see http://en.wikipedia.
j...@gajim.org wrote:
>
> Author: js
> Date: 2009-02-14 15:51:31 +0100 (Sat, 14 Feb 2009)
> New Revision: 11102
>
> Modified:
>branches/osx_newbuildsys/src/osx/growl/growl_c/_growl.c
> Log:
> DON'T append the GPL to a BSD licensed file! This is clearly a license
> violation! Also, don't claim
Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> Yavor Doganov wrote:
>
> > No. If a GPL'ed package incorporates files under GPL-compatible
> > licenses (with or without modifications), it is perfectly OK to
> > prepend the GPL license and copyright notice.
>
> Only if the licen
28 matches
Mail list logo
