Re: [gem5-dev] gem5 wiki can't accept new files?

Yep.. the permissions were wrong. Give it a try now. Ali > On Nov 2, 2017, at 5:54 PM, Gabe Black wrote: > > I think I saw an email from Ali recently that he updated the wiki? Maybe it > has something to do with that? Maybe some file or directory permissions > were

[gem5-dev] Wiki updated

The wiki has been updated to the latest version of mediawiki. Everything appears to be working, but if you run into issues please let me know. Ali ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Re: [gem5-dev] Issue with uploaded images on the wiki

It’s been fixed, sorry about that. Ali > On Apr 27, 2017, at 8:21 AM, Ali Saidi <gem5@overt.org> wrote: > > I upgraded the wiki about a week ago to address some security issues and > something much have gone wrong, I’ll take a look at what is happening. > > A

Re: [gem5-dev] Issue with uploaded images on the wiki

I upgraded the wiki about a week ago to address some security issues and something much have gone wrong, I’ll take a look at what is happening. Ali > On Apr 27, 2017, at 5:53 AM, Andreas Sandberg > wrote: > > I had a quick look at the MediaWiki config and it seems

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3814: misc: Add a CONTRIBUTING document

988> I like Andreas' comments, but actually I don't think the original is negative either. Andreas 1,2 is probably a good reason to do it and the current 1,2 are the carrots of why you should. - Ali Saidi On Feb. 21, 2017, 5:34 p.m., Jason Lowe-Power

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3688: alpha: Remove ALPHA tru64 support and associated tests

688/#comment7787> Both Linux and Tru64 use the same callpal to trigger a system call. - Ali Saidi On Oct. 27, 2016, 7:45 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http:

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3693: riscv: [Patch 7/5] Corrected LRSC semantics

> On Nov. 2, 2016, 7:38 p.m., Alec Roelke wrote: > > This doesn't work with the O3 CPU model; I wrote a simple program that > > performs a lr.w followed by sc.w that works with the atomic-simple, > > timing-simple, and minor CPU models, but with the O3 model I get this error: > > > >

[gem5-dev] Wiki Upgrade

Hi Everyone, The wiki has just been upgraded. Please let us know if there are any problems. Thanks, Ali ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3235: stats: make sim_insts and sim_ops respect stats reset

> On Nov. 25, 2015, 6:42 p.m., Andreas Hansson wrote: > > Traditionally, it's not reset, as it accounting for all instructions > > executed. Perhaps hostSeconds shouldn't be reset as well and then the > > calculation would be correct? sim_insts isn't supposed to be used for > > anything other

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3228: dist: Distributed Ethernet link support for distributed gem5 simulations

ng, we probably shouldn't repeat it here. - Ali Saidi On Nov. 19, 2015, 5:44 p.m., Curtis Dunham wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://revie

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3200: sparc: Make remote debugging with gdb work

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3200/#review7531 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Ali Saidi On Nov. 7, 2015, 9:22 p.m., Palle

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3150: cpu: remove O3's fetch address validity check

> On Oct. 12, 2015, 4:58 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote: > > Can you explain why it is no longer necessary? > > Curtis Dunham wrote: > Empirically, all regressions still pass. :-) > > It might be easier to explain why it was ever necessary, which is > definitely before my time with gem5.

Re: [gem5-dev] including reviewboard URL in commit message?

> On Sep 4, 2015, at 12:54 PM, Steve Reinhardt wrote: > > To answer Jason's question: it would be nice to have an automation system > where someone with sufficient permissions could just click on a patch on > reviewboard and the patch would automatically be committed; with

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3034: base: fix small memory leak in the ELF loader

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3034/#review6936 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Ali Saidi On Aug. 12, 2015, 9:19 p.m., Brandon

Re: [gem5-dev] UnserliazeMemory

Much like the comment says, the virtual memory layer in the operating system lazily allocates pages. If they're zero they'll get lazily allocated so there isn't any reason for us to use up a lot of extra system memory storing 0s. Ali Sent from my ARM powered mobile device On Aug 12, 2015, at

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2741: arch, base, dev, kern, sym: FreeBSD support

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2741/#review6083 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Ali Saidi On April 24, 2015, 5:45 p.m., Ruslan

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2741: arch, base, dev, kern, sym: FreeBSD support

if(!FreeBSD) is added to a few of the lines? Thanks Ruslan. This is getting a lot closer, and it will be great to have FreeBSD support in gem5. I have a couple questions above about code duplication between FreeBSD/Linux. Thanks again, Ali - Ali Saidi On April 19, 2015, 10:12 a.m., Ruslan Bukin wrote

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2729: base: include header file for FreeBSD

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2729/#review6031 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Ali Saidi On April 9, 2015, 9:29 a.m., Ruslan

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2728: base: fix includes for FreeBSD

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2728/#review6032 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Ali Saidi On April 9, 2015, 9:07 a.m., Ruslan

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2730: base: fix FreeBSD OS detection

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2730/#review6030 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Ali Saidi On April 9, 2015, 9:37 a.m., Ruslan

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2731: dev: dont panic on GIC_EOIR

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2731/#review6029 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Ali Saidi On April 9, 2015, 9:51 a.m., Ruslan

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2732: arch: do not set Linux-specific AT elf relocation types on FreeBSD

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2732/#review6033 --- - Ali Saidi On April 9, 2015, 4:42 p.m., Ruslan Bukin wrote

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2732: arch: do not set Linux-specific AT elf relocation types on FreeBSD

On April 9, 2015, 6:06 p.m., Ali Saidi wrote: Sorry, my comments disappeared somewhere. Does this change allow for gem5 to compile on FreeBSD? gem5 to run a FreeBSD binary? Both? If it's the prior, it would be good to allow any type of binary to run on any host OS. If it's the latter, I

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2710: Correct the endianess detection

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2710/#review5978 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Ali Saidi On March 27, 2015, 2 p.m., Ruslan

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2705: Extend access width for IDE control registers

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2705/#review5977 --- Ship it! Thanks for the change! - Ali Saidi On March 25, 2015, 11:10

Re: [gem5-dev] Configuration GUI for gem5

Hi Marcus, Option 1 is probably the most preferred route as the code is much more likely to say in-sync and compatible if it¹s in the same repository and tested along side gem5. The best way to proceed with that option is to post your patches to the gem5 review board http://reviews.gem5.org. If

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: cpu: add support for outputing a protobuf for...

. + * + * Authors: Ali Saidi + */ + +#include cpu/inst_pb_trace.hh + +#include base/callback.hh +#include base/output.hh +#include config/the_isa.hh +#include cpu/static_inst.hh +#include cpu/thread_context.hh +#include debug/ExecEnable.hh +#include params/InstPBTrace.hh +#include proto/inst.pb.h

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: cpu: Remove all notion that we know when the ...

changeset 61a0b02aa800 in /z/repo/gem5 details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=61a0b02aa800 description: cpu: Remove all notion that we know when the cpu is misspeculating. We have no way of knowing if a CPU model is on the wrong path with our

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: arm: always set the IsFirstMicroop flag

changeset 3c42be107634 in /z/repo/gem5 details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=3c42be107634 description: arm: always set the IsFirstMicroop flag While the IsFirstMicroop flag exists it was only occasionally used in the ARM instructions that gem5 microOps and

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: sim: Clean up InstRecord

changeset aef704eaedd2 in /z/repo/gem5 details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=aef704eaedd2 description: sim: Clean up InstRecord Track memory size and flags as well as add some comments and consts. diffstat: src/cpu/base_dyn_inst.hh| 10 +-

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: cpu: Put all CPU instruction tracers in a sin...

changeset fae54a666162 in /z/repo/gem5 details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=fae54a666162 description: cpu: Put all CPU instruction tracers in a single file diffstat: src/arch/arm/ArmNativeTrace.py | 2 +- src/arch/sparc/SparcNativeTrace.py | 2 +-

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: cpu: remove legion tracer

changeset c3fd4c020e49 in /z/repo/gem5 details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=c3fd4c020e49 description: cpu: remove legion tracer If someone wants to debug with legion again they can restore the code from the repository, but no need to have it hang around

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2604: cpu: commit probe notification on every microop or macroop

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2604/#review5754 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Ali Saidi On Jan. 14, 2015, 6:13 p.m., Nikos

Re: [gem5-dev] simpoints and KVM

That is doable. You can created checkpoints, there is just no way to instrument every basic-block. Ali On 1/13/15, 3:13 PM, mike upton via gem5-dev gem5-dev@gem5.org wrote: Oh, Bummer. I was hoping to be able to get simpoints out of a KvmCPU run. It seems like that is not possible. Is it

Re: [gem5-dev] gem5 on redhat6

It should probably be /usr/bin/env python Ali On 1/9/15, 1:12 PM, mike upton via gem5-dev gem5-dev@gem5.org wrote: OK, thanks. I don't understand what is going on, but blindly following the suggestion made it work. I needed to do: python /usr/bin/scons gem5 options Oh, I see what is going

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2305: dev: add an ethernet switch model

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2305/#review5734 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Ali Saidi On July 24, 2014, 7:44 p.m., Anthony

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2585: test: Add a unittest for the BitUnion types.

are the other files? - Ali Saidi On Dec. 17, 2014, 7:08 a.m., Gabe Black wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2585

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2585: test: Add a unittest for the BitUnion types.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2585/#review5715 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Ali Saidi On Dec. 26, 2014, 9:32 p.m., Gabe

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2519: x86: i8042: Give the keyboard controller a little TLC.

- Ali Saidi On Dec. 17, 2014, 7:35 a.m., Gabe Black wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2519/ --- (Updated Dec. 17

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2525: x86: Add a cirrus graphics adapter to x86 systems.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2525/#review5701 --- Ship it! Seems fine... Anyone who deals with Ruby OK? - Ali Saidi

Re: [gem5-dev] InOrder CPU with ARM

The in-order cpu model is deprecated and will soon be removed from the tree. Id you'd like an in order cpu model use the minor cpu model which supports ARM. Ali Sent from my ARM powered mobile device On Dec 17, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Anastasiia via gem5-dev gem5-dev@gem5.org wrote: Hi,

[gem5-dev] Review Request 2558: cpu: remove legion tracer

/2558/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Ali Saidi ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

[gem5-dev] Review Request 2559: cpu: Put all CPU instruction tracers in a single file

/cpu/CPUTracers.py PRE-CREATION src/cpu/ExeTracer.py 4e09ae443c96 src/cpu/IntelTrace.py 4e09ae443c96 src/cpu/NativeTrace.py 4e09ae443c96 src/cpu/SConscript 4e09ae443c96 Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2559/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Ali Saidi

[gem5-dev] Review Request 2560: cpu: Remove all notion that we know when the cpu is misspeculating.

/ Testing --- Thanks, Ali Saidi ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

[gem5-dev] Review Request 2561: sim: Clean up InstRecord

/minor/lsq.cc 4e09ae443c96 src/cpu/simple/atomic.cc 4e09ae443c96 src/cpu/simple/timing.cc 4e09ae443c96 src/sim/insttracer.hh 4e09ae443c96 Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2561/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Ali Saidi ___ gem5-dev mailing list

[gem5-dev] Review Request 2562: arm: always set the IsFirstMicroop flag

4e09ae443c96 src/arch/arm/isa/templates/mem.isa 4e09ae443c96 src/arch/arm/isa/templates/mem64.isa 4e09ae443c96 src/cpu/static_inst.hh 4e09ae443c96 Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2562/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Ali Saidi ___ gem5-dev mailing

[gem5-dev] Review Request 2563: cpu: add support for outputing a protobuf formatted CPU trace

4e09ae443c96 src/proto/inst.proto PRE-CREATION util/decode_inst_trace.py PRE-CREATION Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2563/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Ali Saidi ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2510: Let other objects set up memory like regions in a KVM VM.

I think it’s fine that a device wants to do this, I’d just like it to use an thin interface on the System object as a matter of clean interfaces in the object hierarchy, so unrelated objects don’t have to know about each other. Ali On Dec 3, 2014, at 11:54 AM, Gabe Black via gem5-dev

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2554: misc: Rename the GDB Event event class to InputEvent.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2554/#review5639 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Ali Saidi On Dec. 5, 2014, 10 a.m., Gabe Black

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2555: misc: Add some utility functions for schedule inst commit events.

/#comment5044 can these be doxygen comment? (e.g. /// or /*** one minor request, no need to repost - Ali Saidi On Dec. 5, 2014, 10:36 a.m., Gabe Black wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2556: misc: Generalize GDB single stepping.

but I haven't had a chance to actually test it yet. - Ali Saidi On Dec. 5, 2014, 11:15 a.m., Gabe Black wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2556

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2548: arm: Add unlinkat syscall implementation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2548/#review5616 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Ali Saidi On Dec. 3, 2014, 7:10 p.m., mike upton

Re: [gem5-dev] testing

Hi Gabe/Steve, As Steve mentioned I¹ve been working on a new take on the regression system in my spare-time. I want to get it a bit more complete before I show it to the world, but some of the goals I set out with align with yours. In particular I¹m targeting the following: (1) Success/Failure

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2548: arm: Add unlinkat syscall implementation

On Dec. 4, 2014, 3:03 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote: src/sim/syscall_emul.hh, line 201 http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2548/diff/1/?file=42865#file42865line201 How will the compiler choose between the two versions of unlinkFunc? I think we should either drop the default argument or drop the

Re: [gem5-dev] Search source link broken

daystrom is very low on ram at the moment with the various services we’re running. We have a new machine that has substantially more ram that we’ll be switching to in the near term which should address the issue. For the moment I’ve restarted tomcat and it seems to be working. Ali On Nov 28,

Re: [gem5-dev] KvmCPU Behaviour

There are functions that correspond to this functionality although they’re poorly named for the purpose, but memWriteback() - beginning of KVM simulation; memInvalidate - end of KVM simulation. Another option would be to check for the memory time atomic_noncaching which I believe only KVM uses.

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2523: config: Get rid of some extra spaces around default arguments.

On Nov 26, 2014, at 12:11 PM, Steve Reinhardt via gem5-dev gem5-dev@gem5.org wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Gabe Black via gem5-dev gem5-dev@gem5.org wrote: Just to make sure we're all on the same page, I removed the spaces here because these are default values for arguments.

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2521: ps2: Support translating left and right ALT keys.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2521/#review5561 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Ali Saidi On Nov. 22, 2014, 1:36 p.m., Gabe

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2517: x86: vnc: Add a VNC server to x86 systems.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2517/#review5562 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Ali Saidi On Nov. 22, 2014, 11:39 a.m., Gabe

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2516: config: Add options to take/resume from SimPoint checkpoints

On Nov. 25, 2014, 10:02 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote: configs/common/Options.py, line 155 http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2516/diff/1/?file=42704#file42704line155 Can you explain why we need this separate option for restoring from a checkpoint taken using the take-simpoint-checkpoints? The

Re: [gem5-dev] VNC errors

Looking at the code it looks like it would be possible for there to be 12 bytes in the socket, so the read will return less that 12 bytes (because you got very unlucky and the bytes were split across two packets). Looking at the code fixing that assumption will be a bit of a pain. Ali On

Re: [gem5-dev] Error while building gem5.fast on latest on copy of gem5

What compiler and version are you using? Ali On 11/17/14, 2:37 PM, Urmish Ajit Thakker via gem5-dev gem5-dev@gem5.org wrote: Hi, I pulled up the latest copy of gem5 and got the following error while building gem5.fast. build/ARM/proto/protoio.fo (symbol from plugin): warning: memset used

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2513: KVM: Build in most of the KVM stuff even if we're not going to use it.

be used in case !USE_KVM, but as you allude to this is very ugly. Off the top of my head the way I'd prefer to see it done is let objects register ranges with the System object and then the KVM code could iterate that list if it was compiled in. Sound reasonable? - Ali Saidi On Nov. 18, 2014, 2:27

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: arm: Fix timing wakeup with LLSC

changeset d1dce0b728b6 in /z/repo/gem5 details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=d1dce0b728b6 description: arm: Fix timing wakeup with LLSC diffstat: src/cpu/simple/timing.cc | 12 ++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diffs (29 lines): diff -r

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2474: minor: fixed LSQ MasterPortID

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2474/#review5450 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Ali Saidi On Nov. 10, 2014, 5:20 p.m., Andrew

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2468: Solved bugs while switching cpu models with the --repeat-switch command

would need to comment on the other one. - Ali Saidi On Nov. 7, 2014, 9:35 p.m., Alberto Javier Naranjo Carmona wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2468

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2430: config: Add the ability to read a config file using C++ and Python

or some other checkpoint restore functionality for X86. Ali Saidi wrote: I assume it's working for you without restoring from checkpoints? The code looks like state is being restored, but we've only ever tested it with ARM although I'm not sure why there would be a difference

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2430: config: Add the ability to read a config file using C++ and Python

On Nov. 6, 2014, 7:48 p.m., Cagdas Dirik wrote: This patch seems to be broken for X86 when restoring from checkpoints. A sample test crashes with segmentation fault. Here are the steps: 0. Sample test program does int array manipulation and creates a checkpoint before computation.

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: tests: Update stats no match.

changeset ba51f8572571 in /z/repo/gem5 details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=ba51f8572571 description: tests: Update stats no match. Bootloader I had on my sytem was an older version with a couple of instruction differences. diffstat:

Re: [gem5-dev] Cron m5test@zizzer /z/m5/regression/do-regression --scratch all

These should now be fixed. Thanks, Ali On 11/2/14, 3:20 PM, Cron Daemon via gem5-dev gem5-dev@gem5.org wrote: * build/SPARC/tests/opt/long/fs/80.solaris-boot/sparc/solaris/t1000-simple-a tomic CHANGED! * build/ARM/tests/opt/long/fs/10.linux-boot/arm/linux/realview-minor-dual CHANGED!

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2470: cpu: Minor Draining Bug

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2470/#review5436 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Ali Saidi On Oct. 29, 2014, 3:01 p.m., Andrew

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: arm: Fix multi-system AArch64 boot w/caches.

changeset aa46a8ae3487 in /z/repo/gem5 details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=aa46a8ae3487 description: arm: Fix multi-system AArch64 boot w/caches. Automatically extract cpu release address from DTB file. Check SCTLR_EL1 to verify all caches are enabled.

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: arm: Mark some miscregs (timer counter) regis...

changeset aa23216161fa in /z/repo/gem5 details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=aa23216161fa description: arm: Mark some miscregs (timer counter) registers at unverifiable. The checker can't verify timer registers, so it should just grab the version from the

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: cpu: Add support to checker for CACHE_BLOCK_Z...

changeset 38c7a9ea7729 in /z/repo/gem5 details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=38c7a9ea7729 description: cpu: Add support to checker for CACHE_BLOCK_ZERO commands. The checker didn't know how to properly validate these new commands. diffstat:

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: arm, mem: Fix drain bug and provide drain pri...

changeset d5554f97c451 in /z/repo/gem5 details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=d5554f97c451 description: arm, mem: Fix drain bug and provide drain prints for more components. diffstat: src/arch/arm/table_walker.cc | 5 ++--- src/mem/cache/mshr_queue.cc | 3 +++

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: arm, tests: Update config files to more recen...

changeset b423e1d0735e in /z/repo/gem5 details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=b423e1d0735e description: arm, tests: Update config files to more recent kernels and create 64-bit regressions. This changes the default ARM system to a Versatile Express-like system

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: automated merge

changeset 2b416ef3b400 in /z/repo/gem5 details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=2b416ef3b400 description: automated merge diffstat: src/arch/alpha/linux/process.cc |4 +- src/arch/arm/linux/process.cc|4 +- src/arch/mips/linux/process.cc |4 +-

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: arm: fix bare-metal memory setup.

changeset f33fab6214c4 in /z/repo/gem5 details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=f33fab6214c4 description: arm: fix bare-metal memory setup. The bare-metal configuration option still configured memory with the old scheme that no-longer works. This change

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: tests: Update regressions for the new kernels...

changeset ca4438b6e39a in /z/repo/gem5 details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=ca4438b6e39a description: tests: Update regressions for the new kernels and various preceeding fixes. diffstat: tests/long/fs/10.linux-boot/ref/alpha/linux/tsunami-minor/config.ini

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: arm, tests: Add 64-bit ARM regression tests

changeset bd7c2aa12122 in /z/repo/gem5 details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=bd7c2aa12122 description: arm, tests: Add 64-bit ARM regression tests diffstat: tests/long/fs/10.linux-boot/ref/arm/linux/realview64-minor-dual/config.ini | 2431 +++

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: arm, tests: Forgot the system.terminal files ...

changeset cae494887847 in /z/repo/gem5 details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=cae494887847 description: arm, tests: Forgot the system.terminal files for the new regressions. diffstat: tests/long/fs/10.linux-boot/ref/arm/linux/realview64-minor-dual/system.terminal

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2468: Solved bugs while switching cpu models with the --repeat-switch command

it supposed to be in there. otherwise I think it's good to go. src/mem/ruby/system/RubyMemoryControl.cc http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2468/#comment4911 is this change supposed to be in here? - Ali Saidi On Oct. 26, 2014, 5:16 p.m., Alberto Javier Naranjo Carmona wrote

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2468: Solved bugs while switching cpu models with the --repeat-switch command

I'm not sure which version of gem5 you're using, but in the latest dev repository it looks like this if block is completely gone. I'm not sure if that is because the check has been moved elsewhere or otherwise. - Ali Saidi On Oct. 26, 2014, 5:16 p.m., Alberto Javier Naranjo Carmona

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2468: Solved bugs while switching cpu models with the --repeat-switch command

If you have a chance to test the dev repository that would be great. - Ali Saidi On Oct. 26, 2014, 5:16 p.m., Alberto Javier Naranjo Carmona wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5

[gem5-dev] WriteInvalidate

Hi Everyone, We've noticed an issue with the WriteInvalidate patch where the cpu reads or writes the same cache line that is being write invalidated. We're working on a fix and hope to have it out next week. If not we'll disable the code for the time being. Thanks, Ali

[gem5-dev] Review Request 2463: dev: refactor pci config space for sysfs scanning

space. This change allows the extended PCI config space to be accessed by sysfs properly. Diffs - src/dev/pcidev.hh d96740732a61 src/dev/pcidev.cc d96740732a61 src/dev/pcireg.h d96740732a61 Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2463/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Ali Saidi

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2409: syscall emulation: add EmulatedDriver object

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2409/#review5349 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Ali Saidi On Sept. 23, 2014, 7:46 p.m., Steve

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2411: syscall emulation: devirtualize BaseBufferArg methods

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2411/#review5351 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Ali Saidi On Sept. 23, 2014, 7:47 p.m., Steve

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2412: syscall emulation: minor style fix to LiveProcess constructor

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2412/#review5352 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Ali Saidi On Sept. 23, 2014, 7:47 p.m., Steve

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2400: smt: Fixed IQCount bug

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2400/#review5331 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Ali Saidi On Sept. 15, 2014, 6:29 p.m., Andrew

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2400: smt: Fixed IQCount bug

On Sept. 15, 2014, 8:34 p.m., Ali Saidi wrote: Ship It! Thanks for making the change Andrew. Ali - Ali --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2400/#review5331

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2400: IQCount Patch

of the PQ (e.g. std::priority_queueunsigned, vectorunsigned, std::greaterunsigned PQ) which will sort it the other way. I think that would be a bit clearer than the multiplication by -1. Ali - Ali Saidi On Sept. 10, 2014, 7:09 p.m., Andrew Lukefahr wrote

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: arm: Assume we have a kernel that supports pc...

changeset 1aff1376921e in /z/repo/gem5 details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=1aff1376921e description: arm: Assume we have a kernel that supports pci devices Change the default kernel for AArch64 and since it supports PCI devices remove the hack that made

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: dev: seperate legacy io offsets from PCI offset

changeset 1e2f39859382 in /z/repo/gem5 details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=1e2f39859382 description: dev: seperate legacy io offsets from PCI offset The PC platform has a single IO range that is used both legacy IO and PCI IO while other platforms may

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: arm: Support 2GB of memory for AArch64 systems

changeset 644b615fbe6a in /z/repo/gem5 details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=644b615fbe6a description: arm: Support 2GB of memory for AArch64 systems diffstat: configs/common/FSConfig.py | 27 +++ src/dev/arm/RealView.py| 9 + 2

[gem5-dev] changeset in gem5: dev, arm: Add support for linux generic pci h...

changeset 198dfef33403 in /z/repo/gem5 details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=198dfef33403 description: dev, arm: Add support for linux generic pci host driver This change adds support for a generic pci host bus driver that has been included in recent Linux

Re: [gem5-dev] Updating gem5-stable

of this? I personally prefer keeping a buffer of about 2-3 months between gem5-dev and gem5-stable. -- Nilay On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Ali Saidi via gem5-dev wrote: Looking through the change sets between now and 10231 there are a number of compiler and bug fixes along with a few big changes

Re: [gem5-dev] Using remote gdb with ARM.

A patch would absolutely be welcomed. AArch32 mode still exists and gdb should still work for 32-bit code. This was just an oversight. To be clear gem5 will support ARMv8 going forward but we plan to support both AArch32 and AArch64 code. Thanks, Ali On 19.08.2014 18:19, Anthony Gutierrez

Re: [gem5-dev] Updating gem5-stable

Looking through the change sets between now and 10231 there are a number of compiler and bug fixes along with a few big changes. I think the big changes are quite contained, so I'd be in favor for making changeset 10283 79fde1c67ed8 the new stable if others were ok with that. Ali On

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2167: mem: refactor LRU cache tags and add random replacment tags

for extract set? otherwise ship it - Ali Saidi On July 21, 2014, 6:45 p.m., Anthony Gutierrez wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2167

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >