Re: Notes on branding

Thanks Ted. FYI, "Apache Trafodion" is part of the logo. I'm not putting the project through another round of voting on that one. :) It strikes me that the left (or right) part of a project's web site menu could contain "Apache Incubator Project" as a standard. Such an approach wouldn't impede

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator Logo & Branding

Suggestion; If such new Incubator logo is to be incorporated on podling sites, could it also be standardized to have a "hover popup" containing the standard text and possibly links to further information (both Incubator-specific as well as podling-specific)? Cheers Niclas On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at

Re: Notes on branding

Gunnar, Think that page looks pretty good (not referring to the standards, just looking at the page). Having the word incubator near the logo might be slightly nicer, but that isn't such a big deal since you have that on the project name just above the logo and you have the Incubator logo in the

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator Logo & Branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:42 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:23 PM Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:06 PM, John D. Ament >> wrote: >> > All, >> > >> > As a follow up to the current

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator Logo & Branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > Sounds just right to me. > > I just spend a few minutes going through incubator sites. The number of > sites that had the incubator logo was definitely less in my cursory > examination than the number that made it clear

Re: IPMC release vote checklist

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Joe Witt wrote: >>> Is this what you're looking for >>> >>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator Logo & Branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:23 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:06 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > All, > > > > As a follow up to the current discussions happening, I wanted to get > > opinions from the IPMC on whether or not the

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator Logo & Branding

Sounds just right to me. I just spend a few minutes going through incubator sites. The number of sites that had the incubator logo was definitely less in my cursory examination than the number that made it clear that they were incubating, but the number of sites that didn't make it incubation

Re: IPMC release vote checklist

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Joe Witt wrote: >> Is this what you're looking for >> >>http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list > > That's the MPV check list ;-)

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator Logo & Branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > As a follow up to the current discussions happening, I wanted to get > opinions from the IPMC on whether or not the Incubator logo should be > included in podling websites. Here's how I would summarize the spirit of

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator Logo & Branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > As a follow up to the current discussions happening, I wanted to get > opinions from the IPMC on whether or not the Incubator logo should be > included in podling websites. > > Take

Re: IPMC release vote checklist

Hi, Perhaps this is what you are looking for? http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release.html Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubator Logo & Branding

Hi, > As a follow up to the current discussions happening, I wanted to get > opinions from the IPMC on whether or not the Incubator logo should be > included in podling websites. +1 It gives a clear indication that the project is under incubation at the ASF. Bonus points for it linking to

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Tim Williams wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote: >> Mike, >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:12 PM Mike Jumper wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Gunnar

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 5:39 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Some notes, but again only my opinion. > > <3 > > My only nit pick with the disclaimer placement is that its even below your > normal footer. The more appropriate place is the about section on the home > page. My

[DISCUSS] Incubator Logo & Branding

All, As a follow up to the current discussions happening, I wanted to get opinions from the IPMC on whether or not the Incubator logo should be included in podling websites. Take https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BrandingAuditJune2016 as a summary of podling status. 29 podlings presently show

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Mike, > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:12 PM Mike Jumper wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Gunnar Tapper >> wrote: >> >> > Let me offer up a concrete example

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:38 PM Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:47 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:19 PM Greg Chase wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey

Re: Notes on branding

Mike, On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:12 PM Mike Jumper wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Gunnar Tapper > wrote: > > > Let me offer up a concrete example since I struggle with the issue of > > branding:

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:47 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:19 PM Greg Chase wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey > > > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Gunnar Tapper wrote: > Let me offer up a concrete example since I struggle with the issue of > branding: http://trafodion.apache.org/documentation.html > > I chose the following approach based on input from out mentor Stack: > > - Added

Re: Notes on branding

Some notes, but again only my opinion. On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:44 PM Gunnar Tapper wrote: > Let me offer up a concrete example since I struggle with the issue of > branding: http://trafodion.apache.org/documentation.html > > I chose the following approach based on

Re: Notes on branding

Let me offer up a concrete example since I struggle with the issue of branding: http://trafodion.apache.org/documentation.html I chose the following approach based on input from out mentor Stack: - Added (incubator) to the menu bar - Added the incubator logo on the top of the page - Placed the

Re: IPMC release vote checklist

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:13 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Joe Witt wrote: > > Is this what you're looking for > > > >http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list > > That's the MPV check list

Re: IPMC release vote checklist

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Joe Witt wrote: > Is this what you're looking for > >http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list That's the MPV check list ;-) but I thought we had a much more expanded one on a wiki some place. It is totally

Re: IPMC release vote checklist

Is this what you're looking for http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > I remember we used to have a checklist of things published > somewhere, but I can't find it anymore?

IPMC release vote checklist

Hi! I remember we used to have a checklist of things published somewhere, but I can't find it anymore? What I'm talking about is something along the lines of: signature and hashes good? DISCLAIMER is good? NOTICE is good? LICENSE is good?

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:16 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:52 PM Greg Chase wrote: > > > > > > > This email encrypted by tiny buttons & fat thumbs, beta voice > recognition, > > and autocorrect on my iPhone. > > > > > On Jul 1, 2016,

Re: Advice for incubator releases and naming

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > It's ok for a podling to change its name at any time during the > incubation process, but the earlier the better IMO, by far. If you > don't get a timely answer to PODLINGNAMESEARCH-105 I suggest starting >

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:52 PM Greg Chase wrote: > > > This email encrypted by tiny buttons & fat thumbs, beta voice recognition, > and autocorrect on my iPhone. > > > On Jul 1, 2016, at 1:41 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:35

Re: Notes on branding

This email encrypted by tiny buttons & fat thumbs, beta voice recognition, and autocorrect on my iPhone. > On Jul 1, 2016, at 1:41 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:35 PM Tim Williams wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:05

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:35 PM Tim Williams wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase wrote: > > > >> The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase wrote: > >> The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as "logo in footer" or >> "disclaimer is buried deep or below the fold". > > Incubation

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:47 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:19 PM Greg Chase wrote: > > ... > > > > Spirits can be hard to grasp. As I suggested before. If being > > prescriptive is too difficult, then force new podlings into a >

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:19 PM Greg Chase wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase wrote: > > > > > The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase wrote: > > > The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as "logo in footer" > or > > "disclaimer is buried deep or below the fold". > >

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase wrote: > > > The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as "logo in footer" > or > > "disclaimer is buried deep or below the fold". > > What

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase wrote: > The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as "logo in footer" or > "disclaimer is buried deep or below the fold". Incubation disclaimers are intended to be substantive. They are not CYA legal boilerplate that

Re: [NOTICE] Community vote to graduate Apache Kudu

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:22 AM, John D. Ament > > wrote: > > > >> Is the status page accurate? Only one added

Re: [NOTICE] Community vote to graduate Apache Kudu

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:22 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: > >> Is the status page accurate? Only one added committer and no releases while >> under incubation? >> > > Yes, just one added committer so far.

Fwd: Requesting permission for editing Incubator PMC report

Hi Nick, The "name" which I use for loggin in to https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/July2016 page is Nabarun Nag. Please do let me know if you need any other information. Regards Nabarun Nag *From:* Nick Burch *Date:* June 30, 2016 at 4:07:03 PM PDT *To:*

Re: [NOTICE] Community vote to graduate Apache Kudu

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:22 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > Is the status page accurate? Only one added committer and no releases while > under incubation? > Yes, just one added committer so far. We've had five releases during incubation (3 minor releases with new features,

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 released

The Apache Kudu (incubating) team is happy to announce the release of Kudu 0.9.1! Kudu is an open source storage engine for structured data which supports low-latency random access together with efficient analytical access patterns. It is designed within the context of the Apache Hadoop ecosystem

Re: [NOTICE] Community vote to graduate Apache Kudu

Is the status page accurate? Only one added committer and no releases while under incubation? John On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 1:19 PM Jake Farrell wrote: > A graduation vote has been started for Apache Kudu > > -Jake > > Graduation vote: https://s.apache.org/5hpx > Project

[NOTICE] Community vote to graduate Apache Kudu

A graduation vote has been started for Apache Kudu -Jake Graduation vote: https://s.apache.org/5hpx Project status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/kudu.html Graduation discussion: https://s.apache.org/T8Uj

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:35 PM Greg Chase wrote: > Thanks for doing the audit. > > The Geode PPMC has noted the finding in the wiki with our site. > > However, we'd like to see a good example of a compliant website. > > The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > > > * Although redirections are correctly handled, I'd remove all getkudu.io > links in the documentation to use the new canonical domain kudu.apache.org > > * I noticed you incubating releases are not clearly marked

Re: Mailing list creation (DistributedLog)

I had to hop over to Hipchat last week to poke infra about lists for Pirk. Thankfully, Daniel made some time and knocked it out for me shortly after asking. Not sure if there is a reason for the delay, but a light-hand will probably help sort it out :) John D. Ament wrote: Sounds like a

Re: Notes on branding

On 2016-07-01 07:37 (-0700), Shane Curcuru wrote: > > In particular, any feedback on our published policies/guidelines is very > important. As we scale, we need to ensure that most podlings can figure > out the right thing to do from the docs, and not as much from

Re: Notes on branding

Thanks for doing the audit. The Geode PPMC has noted the finding in the wiki with our site. However, we'd like to see a good example of a compliant website. The branding guidelines do not address feedback such as "logo in footer" or "disclaimer is buried deep or below the fold". Considering

Re: Notes on branding

John D. Ament wrote on 6/29/16 7:36 AM: > Hey guys > > I'm starting to go through the podlings to identify branding issues. > Touched the first 12 projects, for those that had websites, 4 were not > within branding requirements. > > I'm not sure if other scan give a hand here on contacting

Re: [VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:00 AM Jan van Doorn wrote: > Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting > Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator. > > [] +1 Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator > [] +0 Abstain. > [] -1 Do not accept

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Taverna Command-line 3.1.0-incubating

The Apache Taverna (incubating) team is pleased to announce the release of: apache-taverna-commandline 3.1.0-incubating apache-taverna-engine 3.1.0-incubating apache-taverna-commonactivities 2.1.0-incubating This is the first major release of Apache Taverna since joining the Apache Software

[VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator. [] +1 Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator [] +0 Abstain. [] -1 Do not accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator because ... This vote will be open for at

Re: Mailing list creation (DistributedLog)

Sounds like a question better for infra. They have been through a number of hiccups this week. John On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:46 AM Flavio Junqueira wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm wondering how long it typically takes infra to create the mailing > lists for a podling. I have

Mailing list creation (DistributedLog)

Hi there, I'm wondering how long it typically takes infra to create the mailing lists for a podling. I have requested the creation of the lists for the DistributedLog podling, but I haven't seen any response. We typically receive the notification via the private list, and how much longer I

Re: Notes on branding

John, It seems to me you just defined a (potential) solution direction. Best regards, Pierre On Friday, July 1, 2016, John D. Ament wrote: > Its definitely an option, once we have a clear sign in place. Just don't > forget, clutch isn't magic. Unless we build some

Re: Notes on branding

Its definitely an option, once we have a clear sign in place. Just don't forget, clutch isn't magic. Unless we build some smarts that can visit the podling page, look at the webpage and see if the incubator logo are present, its going to be based on a flag in podlings.xml. I can actually think

Re: Notes on branding

Hi John, All, My suggestion is to improve the incubator clutch, so that the overview http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html reflects whether podlings are: 1. Compliant with ASF Branding regulations 2. Compliant with ASF Incubator Branding regulations. Best regards, Pierre Smits

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Trafodion (incubating) release 2.0.1-incubating RC3

Thanks for your vote. Appreciate you taking time to review the release. The original code included a website where the code was downloaded from but the address was no longer valid. So I found a version with the BSD 3 license. I downloaded the files and compared them to Trafodion files. I was