Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Move Jakarta Regexp to Attic

In message , Rahu l Akolkar writes: >This is a vote to move Jakarta Regexp to the Apache Attic, based on >the outcome of the most recent discussion on the topic. +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.

Re: [RESULT][VOTE][LAZY] Move ECS, ORO and Regexp to Attic

In message , Rahu l Akolkar writes: >We will not move Regexp at this time as vgritsenko has expressed some >interest in a recent bugfix (his vote to move Regexp to the Attic was >+0). Lets revisit Regexp in 6 months time if there isn't much >activity. Six months have passed and there hasn't been

Re: removing attic'ed projects from www.apache.org/dist

I wrote: >Whatever the case may be, I'd still like to remove >www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/{ecs,oro,taglibs} if there are no objections. ... >that in?), I can remove the "Downloads" link from the oro and ecs pages. Since there were no objections, I executed the above actions. daniel ---

removing attic'ed projects from www.apache.org/dist

For anyone who didn't see the original thread, the PMC received instructions to review their release distribution areas in www.apache.org/dist and remove any old releases. sebb removed some older releases, and I asked if the oro tree could be removed entirely since it has moved to the attic. Howe

Re: New home for ECS, ORO and Regexp?

In message , Rahu l Akolkar writes: >Daniel (or anyone else) - Should we check if there is interest at >Commons in taking ORO? I'm reluctant to encourage additional expenditure of effort to keep ORO going (although I'm always available to apply patches and respond to issue reports). Let's wait a

Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 2.4 based on RC3

In message , sebb AT ASF writes: >Please can I have votes for the release of JMeter 2.4? >[X ] +1 I support this release daniel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail

Re: New home for ECS, ORO and Regexp?

In message <25aac9fc1003031751x7d696c4anfe502bc69979a...@mail.gmail.com>, sebb writes: >JMeter also uses ORO, but so long as the existing release remains >available, it does not matter if it moves to Attic, as ORO works fine >as it is. There are some RE features that it does not support (such as

Re: [VOTE] Merge dev lists

In message , Rahul Akolkar writes: >This is a vote to consolidate the development lists at Jakarta into >one development and one notifications list. For background including >timing, anticipated benefits and some discussion, see proposal [1] >thread. [X] +1 -

Re: [PROPOSAL] One development list

In message <4ad4c6e2.2090...@dubioso.net>, Roland Weber writes: >Have you noticed how much traffic there is on jmeter-user? >It will easily drown all other communication on a combined >user list. Subscribers to any other Jakarta user list will >*not* be amused about getting all that into their inb

Re: [PROPOSAL] One development list

In message , Rahul Akolkar writes: >We currently have 8 active development lists at Jakarta, each devoted >to a subproject. I've been subscribed to all for a while and based on >my observations and the overall benefits of doing so, I think its time >to consolidate them into a single development l

Re: [PROPOSAL] The future of Jakarta

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Henr i Yandell" writes: >Chiefly, we need to decide if we're sending the Commons proposal. The We decided already to submit the Commons proposal by virtue of the vote result. I suggest we uphold the current decision and submit the proposal in order to make some p

Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roland Weber writes: >Rory Winston - was added by Daniel Savarese >Torsten Curdt - was added as chair by Henri Yandell Rory voted for the proposal so I saved him the time and redundancy when I added myself after voting for the proposal. I assume Henri did the same

Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

>[X] +1 I support the proposal >[ ] +0 I don't care >[ ] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Release Regexp 1.5

+1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PROPOSAL] Create [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailinglist..

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andrew C. Oliver" writes: >lists. (If you disagree look at the list archive for >each over the last 6 months and see if you REALLY disagree in more than >THEORY). At least for oro, some Linux distributions continue to ship it as part of their core packages. For

Re: [PROPOSAL] Create [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailinglist..

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin van den Bemt writes: >The strength of this list should be is that with a lot of hands the chance tha >t nothing happens when >there is activity is minimized. If someone has an hour to spare, it could very > well be useful to >apply a patch and mentor people.

Re: Tracking Jakarta Software Dependencies

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ortwin_Gl=FCck?= writes: >JDK version: what a mess. IMHO this is THE information that is missing >on almost ANY project page out there. I think everyone's responses have brought this topic to closure. Library dependencies are already available from m

Re: Tracking Jakarta Software Dependencies

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Yoav Shapira" writes: >(e.g. build.properties). I'm hesitant to have a separate web page >just to list dependencies unless that page is auto-generated (as is I agree. I'm sure there's a way to autogenerate a master table for all the mavenized projects, but sinc

Tracking Jakarta Software Dependencies

Hi All, I and other Jakarta committers received an email today from a developer at Wachovia pointing out how difficult it is to discover library and JDK dependencies for Jakarta subprojects as a whole, even though his main focus was Commons. I couldn't really dispute his observation upon trying

Re: [VOTE] Remove SVN restrictions

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Henri Yandell writes: >Vote to remove the SVN barriers within Jakarta such that all jakarta-* >groups are merged into the one jakarta group with the exception of >jakarta-hivemind, jakarta-slide, jakarta-cactus and jakarta-jmeter under >the assumption that they a

Re: Representing project inactivity on the site

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Henri Yandell writes: >Active Development >Maintenance Mode >Unsupported I think you nailed it. Active, Supported, and Unsupported. Or Active, Inactive (Supported), and Inactive (Unsupported). Anyway, whatever the specific names end up being, that's the gist of

Re: Representing project inactivity on the site

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Yoav Shapira" writes: >I do care, a lot, as a user. Active means bugs are getting fixed, the >mailing lists are a reasonable source for help, and if new standards I think that's a reason why perhaps a finer gradation than inactive and active may be in order. Fo

Re: [PROPOSAL] Two community proposals

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Henri Yandell writes: >1) Remove SVN restrictions, all Jakarta committers can commit anywhere in >Jakarta, with the exception of the Commons-Sandbox as it allows Apache >committers in general to commit. > >2) All vote threads to occur on the general@ mailing list;

Re: Standard Implementation-Vendor-Id

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, robert burrell donkin write s: >i've done some hunting round and it appears that now this really should >be set: implementation-vendor-id is used by later versions of the >extension mechanism and it no longer works unless it is set. see >http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5

Standard Implementation-Vendor-Id

Someone submitted a Bugzilla request for an Implementation-Vendor-Id value to be added to the oro jars (without explaining why they needed it given that Implementation-Vendor is defined). I don't think we've ever specified a standard Implementation-Vendor-Id for Jakarta jar files. Will the follow

Re: [VOTE] Release Regexp 1.4

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Vadim Gritsenko writes: >and vote for a release. +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Dormancy worries

I'm not a fan of the mothballing concept as I understand its proposed implementation, but I agree that some process for officially relegating a project to maintenance mode may be necessary. In some sense, projects like oro and regexp have been victims of their own success. Both moved into Jakart

Re: CVS->SVN Was: SVN of ECS

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Henri Yandell writes: >2 >- >Going with the example of trunk/tags/branches/site, I'd like to suggest >using releases/ rather than tags/. It seems closer to what we mean. Tags >does seem more common though, so just a suggestion. ... >- > >jakarta/ > tomcat/ >

Re: SVN of ECS Re: [Jakarta Wiki] Updated: JakartaBoardReport-September2004

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Noel J. Bergman" w rites: >Done. Thanks Noel! I know these things are normally supposed to go through infrastructure, but I thought I could test it out in the test repository without troubling anyone first. Everything looks good and doing the conversion even hel

Re: SVN of ECS Re: [Jakarta Wiki] Updated: JakartaBoardReport-September2004

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Henri Yandell writes: >Well, do we know who would be the one to accept the offer? I made a dump of jakarta-oro in ~dfs/pub/oro.svn.dump. I can't do svnadmin load --parent-dir jakarta-oro /x1/svn/test < oro.svn.dump because you need to be in the svnadmin group.

Re: Updating the PMC bylaws

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, robert burr ell donkin writes: >that's why i would prefer something more positive. i'd prefer something >about mandating the pmc to take action to ensure appropriate >supervision when the number of active committers on the pmc falls below >three. this could mean

[CORRETION][RESULT][VOTE] ORO 2.0.8 maintenance release

The original vote tally for this vote was incorrectly listed as 4 +1 binding votes. There were in fact 5 +1 binding votes. The restated results follow: - The resolution to approve a 2.0.8 maintenance release of jakarta-oro has passed with 5 binding +1 votes from Jakarta PMC members and

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] ORO 2.0.8 maintenance release

>Now I see it went "just" to general & pmc, because I was following on >the informative re-broadcast, so this is the reason why it has not been >counted. No, I screwed up. I remember counting your vote and verifying "bindingness" against the committee file, but screwed up and didn't record it

[RESULT][VOTE] ORO 2.0.8 maintenance release

The resolution to approve a 2.0.8 maintenance release of jakarta-oro has passed with 4 binding +1 votes from Jakarta PMC members and no -1 votes. Many thanks to all who voted. I will now proceed to package and upload a release for distribution, update appropriate Web pages, and email an announce

Re: [VOTE] ORO 2.0.8 maintenance release

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Daniel F. Savarese " writes: >[X] +1 I approve the release of jakarta-oro version 2.0.8. >[ ] -1 I do not approve the release of jakarta-oro version 2.0.8. I vote +1. daniel --

[VOTE] ORO 2.0.8 maintenance release

I know now may not be the best time to have a vote, but I would ask the PMC to vote on approving the release of jakarta-oro 2.0.8. The current code base contains important bug fixes and has gone too long without a public release. [ ] +1 I approve the release of jakarta-oro version 2.0.8. [ ] -1

Re: "jakarta" name - (?vote?)

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Vic Cekvenich writes: >This not a topic that anyone wants to bring up: >Should jakarta.apache.org be changed to xyz.apache.org? ... >"Jakarta" name has a a bit of political connotations, some PHB might see >as negtaive and has had for about a year now. >A non city

Re: answer to Howard or State of the POI (WAS: Re: Jakarta-POI 1.10.0-dev released)

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andrew C. Oliver" writes: >Next, I measure the success of it by two other things: Microsoft's ... >Microsoft sort of way) and the final crux will be the day this >http://www.tidestone.com/index.jsp goes out of business. The first clue I don't think this is an

Re: Another unused import statement report is out...

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Tom Copeland" writes: >assertTrue("Whoa, doSomething returned a non-Fred type!", doSomething() >instanceof Fred); I retract my comment about needing to do something with the variable. Tom's comment here, in my opinion, is the best approach. daniel

Re: Another unused import statement report is out...

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hen ri Yandell writes: >Basically. Except it's: > >Fred fred = (Fred)doSomething(); in some cases. Shouldn't you actually do something with the result as a precaution to ensure the assignment doesn't get optimized out (either by the JIT or the compiler)? (Or make

Re: [DRAFT1] Jakarta Newsletter - January 2003

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Daniel F. Savarese " writes: >Although the newsletter is for January, here's another item for >Jakarta Commons from February (Commons committers feel free to >ammend this entry): Looks like I made some typing turds. Here's a

Re: [DRAFT1] Jakarta Newsletter - January 2003

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, robert burr ell donkin writes: >(here's some bits and pieces from the commons.) > >Jakarta Commons >=== Although the newsletter is for January, here's another item for Jakarta Commons from February (Commons committers feel free to ammend this entry): N

jakarta-site2 graffiti

Who's the joker who changed some of the copyright statements at the bottom of some pages in jakarta-site2 from "Apache Software Foundation" to "ApacheARSE Software Foundation"? I just noticed it when I updated site/binindex.html and ran a diff before doing a check in. Doing some further checkin

Re: New logo for Jakarta, following the one on www.apache.org

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nicola Ken Barozzi writes: >Attached is a rehashed logo for Jakarta to mimic more the one on the >main Apache page, and explicitly state that Jakarta is an Apache project. Nitpick: Don't forget to add a trailing slash in the URL (e.g., http://jakarta.apache.org/ i

Re: [PATCH] http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html broken url

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Santiago Gala writes: >Santiago Gala wrote: >I have enough karma for xml/html committing, but not for ssh to the web >machine. So, could anybody with enough karma update the site? I just did a cvs update mail2.html, but it doesn't look like there was any change c

Re: News Page Problems

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kur t Schrader writes: >It seems that whomever updated http://jakarta.apache.org/site/news.html >last somehow managed to generate it in such a way so that it has two >menus, instead of just one. The jakarta-site2 build from CVS appears to >work correctly though, s

Re: Did somebody update the Jakarta site directly?

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED] bm.com>, "Sam Ruby" writes: >http://www.apache.org/~rubys/updatesite.log4 > >Note the mod to 'whoweare.html" and the errors in poi... I did a fresh checkout of jakarta-site2 and edited xdocs/whoweare.xml last night, did the usual build docs/whoweare.html, and checke

JCP Program Chair responds to Apache Software Foundation (fwd)

Hot off the press: --- Forwarded Message From: Harold Ogle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: JCP Program Chair responds to Apache Software Foundation To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] JCP Program Chair responds to Apache Software Foundation: The Apache Software Foundation published a position statemen

[OT] JCP rant

Somebody asked on the axi-user mailing list why they should use Axis instead of JAXM. I offered some comments, but tried not to stray too off topic. In light of a recent JCP-related thread, I thought there might not be any objections on general@jakarta if I vented for a minute. When you use JA

Re: jakarta-site2 update (please)

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andrew C. Oliver" writes: >Announced new POI pre-release.. . please update site-2 -- thanks done -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: POI web update

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andrew C. Oliver" writes: >Hi, We've committed a number of changes to the POI site. If someone >with requisite karma could apply this on the http server we'd appreciate >it. I just did a cvs update in /www/jakarta.apache.org/poi on daedalus. A bunch of the fil

Re: ApacheForge

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Hammant writes: >I like the idea of a seperate, but endorsed ApacheForge site. It would >give i) Encouragement ii) Independance but also iii) Community. I think >it is a good and safe solution to what I think is the catch-22 situation >of trying to get a

Re: Jakarta ORO NetComponents or some other Java FTP API?

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Daniel F. Savares e" writes: >time to NetComponents because I don't use it and would redesign and >rewrite it if I did. There appear to still be a lot of people using Rather, I don't use it much because of the types of projects I work on these days. Didn't mean

Re: Jakarta ORO NetComponents or some other Java FTP API?

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >I'm trying to get in touch with the Jakarta PMC to find out what the status is >of accepting Daniel Savarese's ORO NetComponents to be part of Jakarta. Also, No proposal has been made. As I indicated on my web site, before making any p

Re: [PROPOSAL] POI @ Jakarta

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andrew C. Oliver" writes: >Proposal for "POI" - A Jakarta Subproject >version 1.0 - 17 Jan 2002 ... +1 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Jakarta PMC bylaws change

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Sam Ruby " writes: >The number of PMC seats will be set at seven. Annually, all seven seats >will be up for renewal. The ASF board will be asked to provide a person or >persons to administer the nominations and a subsequent ballot. The >administrator(s) will det

Re: Just the JARs

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ted Husted writes: >The license issue is well taken. I think it would be a good practice for >us to include a license in all of our JARs. Even when we don't >distribute them seperately ourselves, they are intended to be >distributed seperately by our licensees. Poi

Re: [Vote] BCEL @ Jakarta

I finally caught up on the whole BCEL thread. +1 daniel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: New jar dependency for Cactus

In message <01e701c15b16$c9eee7d0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Vince nt Massol" writes: >I'd like to ask if anyone sees a problem for using AspectJ >(http://www.aspectj.org) with Cactus ? More specifically the license is MPL >(http://aspectj.org/servlets/AJSite?channel=download&subChannel=license). Is >t

Re: [PROPOSAL] New Project Creation Guidelines

+1 daniel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ASPizer

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ceki Gulcu writes: >Coming back to the issue at hand, if ASPizer authors are truly >committed to open source and the Apache model, they should counter >Jon's remarks and justify the reasons why their product should be part >of Jakarta. ... >I did not read anyone bu

Re: [VOTE] Making Commons-Cactus a top level projet

+1 daniel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [OT] FW: Sun Headquarter Briefings: Developing Web Services

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jon Stevens writes: >Can someone explain to me what the heck "web services" are so that I can >decide whether or not this is even worthwhile to learn about? Right now it's mostly vapor, at least on the Sun ONE end of things. Too many of the Java APIs related to We

Re: Summary (was Re: Scope)

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ted Husted writes: >And, oops, I just realized that I never promoted the working draft of >the guidelines > >< http://jakarta.apache.org/site/proposal.html > > >to the top level of the site. Assuming that's still OK, I'll go ahead >and do that. > >Perhaps I should

Summary (was Re: Scope)

I don't know how useful this thread has been to everyone else, but it's been helpful to me because I was starting to feel I misunderstood the spirit of the Jakarta project. I think it might be useful to add these extracts from the thread as addenda to "Creation of subprojects" on http://jakar

Re: Scope

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Sam Ruby " writes: >Duplication (e.g., multiple templating technologies) doesn't bother me so >much as different focus. > >An RDB is a big endeavor. I'm sorry, I didn't indicate that I wasn't addressing the RDB proposal, but rather the ancillary comments about An

Scope

I'm a loss to understand the problem. People assert that projects are out of scope yet also assert how much they like them. Is it not better to generate good code that lots of people use than to nitpick about staying in scope? If Jakarta is home to a bunch of projects that people think are cra

Re: Contact info...

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Pier P. Fumagalli" writes: >Trying to send mail to Daniel F. Savarese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, but all I get >are bounces... Anyone has different contact info? Send it to dfs at apache.org and it will forward to me. I'm overly ag

Re: jakarta-site2 process changes needed (heads up)

In message , "Craig R. McCl anahan" writes: >doesn't happen again, and also update the permissions to add group write >on the following files: ... > mail.html (dfs owner) Fixed. Sorry. I'm usually pretty meticulous about permissions. daniel

Re: Reply-to munging

>HELL YES! > >That essay conveys *exactly* what I was thinking. I love it. Thanks for the >link. I'm saving that one forever. Me too. It did a great job of capturing the vacuous nature of each argument in the original essay. I took the liberty of adding a neutral statement with links to both e

Re: Reply-to munging

>Can we turn off the munging of headers that is currently adding Reply-to on >all the jakarta lists? > >Please read > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html >before asking why it's a problem. It was only a matter of time before this came up as it always does on mailing lists. The

Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta

>> [ ]Jon Stevens > >-0 > >It seems like xml.apache.org should be the place, but I really don't care >where it lives that much cause we can always move projects around if we need >to. I do think that if it goes to xml.apache.org it should be a top level >project. I feel about the same. xml.apa

Re: Proposal to make BSF an ASF project

>"Pier P. Fumagalli" wrote: >> >> Sam Ruby at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> > Craig R. McClanahan wrote: >> >> >> >> +1 for BSF as a Jakarta project. >> > >> > Ditto. >> >> Doh :) +1 >> >> Pier > >Re me > >+1 > >geir +1 -

Re: What are we doing in regards to JDK 1.4?

>I've been playing with regex along with the nio classes and I must say that >they integrate with each other extremely well. You must try out some of the >new api's to fully appreciate the performance gains you will get from their >new SocketChannel/ByteBuffer approach to networking. The regex

Re: [Lucene-dev] jakarta (fwd)

>Is the rest of the PMC interested in seeing this happen? (I am and will >be the PMC sponsor). +1 So when do we start using it on the jakarta site? :) daniel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional comman

site/bindindex.xml

/binindex.xml patch Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed ; boundary="==_Exmh_14427391380" Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 00:41:33 -0400 From: "Daniel F. Savarese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, Could someone please eithe

Re: Hosting FAQs on jGuru +1

>>>from the forum to the FAQ (our standard system). We will need a >>>participating project to provide a manager. It should require about >>1-3hrs >>>a week from the manager (depending on how busy the Forum/FAQ is). Is -1 Reasons: o The FAQs at jGuru are mostly AQs and are not adequately s

Re: [proposal] Jakarta Deprecation Policy

>What I propose is that we take this document (or one similar to it) and >migrate it up to the overall Jakarta Project instead of just being a Turbine >policy and get all the projects to "sign" their name on it. > > +1 >Comments? Nothing cont

Re: Proposed dirlayout document

>IMHO, the intermediate build directory can and should be avoided. Instead of s >electively copying from the intermediate build/ directory to dist/, one can ge >nerate directly to dist/ and use tar/zip selectively to create the distributio >n. The latter solution keeps just one copy of files whic

Re: bug report handling

>especially when they are incorrectly modified. In this case, the original >reporter of the bug went in and changed the status of the bug without >heeding the bug resolution comment. The procedure I would recommend Ok, I keep on putting my foot in my mouth. Get a little free time and see what

bug report handling

Please ignore the who part of my previous email as has been kindly pointed out to me I should have just used the "view bug activity" option. However, the "spurious changing of bug status" part of my email holds. Can just anyone change a bug's status? If so, that's a problem that we need to fix

Re: [Bug 1346] Changed - substitue gives strange result

Sorry for hitting three lists, but it's the only way to root out the culprit. Who changed the status of this bug (the one at the end of this message) to VERIFIED? Why weren't any comments added? Unless someone points out the capturing parentheses in the expression (all appear to be non-capturi

Re: general Digest 12 Apr 2001 19:55:17 -0000 Issue 349

>The two somewhat workable times are 1200 GMT and 2000 GMT. I'd like to >hear opinions on the following two options: Sorry for the belated reply -- digest mode and 16 hour work days. Either time will work for me (I'm on EDT, which appears to get the best deal). daniel -

Re: Checking in jars - an update

I follow the digest, so by the time I read the list a thread has pretty much reached conclusion. But I've never seen this discussed before and it's something I've had questions about. As a general rule, I think you should never check in libraries (i.e., jars) upon which a revision controlled mo