On 27 Jun 2004, at 21:35, Henri Yandell wrote:
As the wiki-update emails don't seem to get through to this list,
thought
I'd let people know I've done a bit of reorganization of the Jakarta
Wiki
page:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/
I've also added a bunch of ideas and thoughts.
IMHO this is som
they look right to me. someone's added a redirect for pluto to portals
TLP:
Redirect Permanent /pluto http://portals.apache.org/pluto
so i've committed them into CVS and replaced the local copy.
- robert
On 27 Jun 2004, at 17:18, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
the .htaccess file for the jakarta site has
the .htaccess file for the jakarta site has been modified directly but
is maintained in CVS. unless anyone knows a good reason not to, i'll
update the copy in CVS with the changes.
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE
Begin forwarded message:
From: Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 24 June 2004 13:48:10 BST
To: Apache Committers Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ApacheCon
discussions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ApacheCon announcements
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Apache httpd users list
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subje
hi andy
i think that jk2 is developed by the tomcat community. you'll probably
get a better answer faster by asking on one of the tomcat lists. read
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html for more information.
- robert
On 22 Jun 2004, at 11:35, Andy Armstrong wrote:
I'm just making sure the L
On 22 Jun 2004, at 08:51, Emulsify Adren wrote:
Hi,
i'm interested to know whether i need to pay to run Apache Tomcat
5.0.x and where can i get a copy of it. hope to hear from you soon.
thanks in advance.
apache tomcat (together with all the other ASF - http://www.apache.org
- releases) is open
On 20 Jun 2004, at 22:45, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
PROPOSAL
i'd like to shift all jakarta commons component downloads onto
separate
pages which are linked from the main ones. i think that this will
prolong the useful life of the original page wit
BACKGROUND
--
the common release download pages for jakarta products currently list
as many of these as possible. by it's nature, the number of
jakarta-commons components has risen over time and will most likely
continue to rise in the future. at the moment, the download pages are
hard
hi howard
(i'm assuming that this is about getting new jars into the java
repository so they can be accessed b maven.)
AIUI the process is still being developed so documentation is patchy at
best. i'd suggest subscribing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and asking what
to do there.
- robert
On 24 Apr 20
--Original Message-----
From: robert burrell donkin
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 2:03 PM
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: [site] thinking about adding a couple of links from resources
in the light of the recent debate over on licensing about the
inability
for java fol
in the light of the recent debate over on licensing about the inability
for java folks to take their jakarta fix in the usual packaged/ported
*nix fashion, i thought i might add links to a couple of well-known
downstream distributors of packages and ports to the resources
(unofficial) section:
On 1 Apr 2004, at 21:44, Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
I assume the website is about to be updated with this information? I
tried
to email [EMAIL PROTECTED], but typically, heh, the
recipients
mail server was down or unreachable ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Send a note to the struts-dev list, they're respons
On 19 Mar 2004, at 08:50, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, robert burrell donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11 Mar 2004, at 12:47, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Tetsuya Kitahata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 08:32:31 +0100
Stefan Bodewig wrot
On 11 Mar 2004, at 12:47, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Tetsuya Kitahata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 08:32:31 +0100
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Depends on what you consider a sister resource.
At least, I guess robert is considering planetapache
would be one of them :)
--
at the moment, we have a section on the jakarta navigation bar that's
titled 'Translated (Web)'. i've been wondering whether it might be
better to rename this to something like 'Community Resources
(Unofficial)'. this would make it clear that (though we're very
grateful for these sites), they a
On 1 Mar 2004, at 12:15, Marcus Sundman wrote:
maybe it'd be cool to have a complete latest-first index of all news
stories in the news index page. that way, not only would it be a
useful
resource but also it'd be a fixed page for people to book mark.
Yes.
(Well, it would be "cool" in the sense
On 3 Mar 2004, at 22:28, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Quoting Christopher Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
You're not saying that the boilerplate text should appear as comment
in
every generated HTML document, are you?
Yes, I am. For the same reason that it's in every Java file.
+1
(it probably needs t
On 25 Feb 2004, at 13:33, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Feb 24, 2004, at 5:08 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
i've just committed the reorganization i proposed last week. i've
moved all the news documents into the news subdirectory and all now
have date-related names (so no renaming
On 2 Mar 2004, at 20:21, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 20:08:42 +
robert burrell donkin wrote:
the .vsl template should definitely be altered to include the
boilerplate (as a comment) but i think that it'd be good to think
about
including a meta and/or link tags as we
On 2 Mar 2004, at 02:06, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Quoting Tetsuya Kitahata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 22:24:02 +
robert burrell donkin wrote:
i've had a quick google and i'm not sure that there's a consensus out
there on this. i like the idea of modifying
i've had a quick google and i'm not sure that there's a consensus out
there on this. i like the idea of modifying the .vsl file and i'd be
inclined to add both formulations. maybe this would be a good question
to raise on community...
- robert
On 1 Mar 2004, at 17:25, Christopher Lenz wrote:
On 1 Mar 2004, at 12:15, Marcus Sundman wrote:
I think the best solution would be to have one page with news
old, and
then have a completely separate news archive where news are
categorized by
month/year/whatever. The former could have news from both Jakarta and
elsewhere on the same page, preven
it seems to me that the javadocs are distributed just like everything
else in the release. so, it seems to me that we need to alter our
builds so that the apache license 2 is included. we could do this by
setting the license as a header or footer (or something) in the javadoc
build.
anyone hav
the generated html does not contain an explicit license just a
copyright. am i right in thinking that now it would be better to
publish them under the apache license 2?
also, am i right in thinking that all the source documentation should
have license notices added?
- robert
-
On 27 Feb 2004, at 07:49, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, robert burrell donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
do the gump team plan to continue to use the jakarta announcement
mailing list or will they be creating a new list?
We'll have a [EMAIL PROTECTED] that takes over
On 27 Feb 2004, at 12:19, Marcus Sundman wrote:
Would it be possible to have symlinks like
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/news/news-latest.html
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/news/elsewhere-latest.html
that would point to the latest news?
we'd then risk people losing long term urls. probably getti
On 25 Feb 2004, at 13:33, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Feb 24, 2004, at 5:08 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
i've just committed the reorganization i proposed last week. i've
moved all the news documents into the news subdirectory and all now
have date-related names (so no renaming
we'd then risk people losing long term urls. probably getting apache to
do temporary redirects from those urls would be ok, though. of course,
i'd be interested to know what other people think on this before
actually doing anything about it...
- robert
On 26 Feb 2004, at 12:56, Marcus Sundman
On 26 Feb 2004, at 19:42, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
probably getting apache to do temporary redirects from those urls
You do know that /www/jakarta.apache.org/.htaccess is in CVS, right?
i do now :)
thanks
- robert
-
To unsubscrib
do the gump team plan to continue to use the jakarta announcement
mailing list or will they be creating a new list?
- robert
On 26 Feb 2004, at 22:30, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Tetsuya Kitahata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- The Apache Gump Project will now oversee the development and
mainte
i've just committed the reorganization i proposed last week. i've moved
all the news documents into the news subdirectory and all now have
date-related names (so no renaming should be necessary and therefore
the urls will be permanent). the html versions of the old pages now
redirect to the new
On 24 Feb 2004, at 16:06, Tom Copeland wrote:
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 17:28, Danny Angus wrote:
If its not too patronising of me I'd like to propose vote of thanks
to Sam as outgoing chair,
+n, where n >= 1
+n!
(that's a factorial sign rather than an exclamation mark ;)
- robert
i've now discovered that news from jakarta is being disseminated to a
wider audience. this is a good thing but a bit unexpected (at least to
me). this raises the issue that we do not - at the moment - have
permanent urls for our news stories. they go into news.xml which is
then archived. this m
On 13 Feb 2004, at 06:05, RK wrote:
Iam new in writing apache modules, can anybody tell me where can i get
the
documentation regarding development of Apache modules in C++
this list is general at the jakarta project (within apache). you're
asking for information about the httpd project. for help
On 13 Dec 2003, at 22:22, Martin Poeschl wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 12 Dec 2003, at 09:28, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 21:07, robert burrell donkin wrote:
hi henning
you don't need to be a committer to act as a mentor. from what i've
heard, i&
On 12 Dec 2003, at 09:28, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 21:07, robert burrell donkin wrote:
hi henning
you don't need to be a committer to act as a mentor. from what i've
heard, i'd say that you'd be an ideal candidate :)
Hi,
thanks. :-)
I'm wi
ot;release management experience". ;-)
Regards
Henning
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 13:13, robert burrell donkin wrote:
in this case, i'd say we'll need sufficient volunteers from the
jakarta
pmc to ensure oversight during this period. it'd probably be good if
On 8 Dec 2003, at 04:20, Phil Steitz wrote:
Then maybe
instead of breaking it on code-base, we could break it on concept:
jakarta-bugs
jakarta-announce
jakarta-dev
jakarta-pmc
jakarta-ideas
jakarta-site
or something. I'm assuming it'll be too noisy, but it is a logical
question to ask based on C
On 8 Dec 2003, at 21:07, Costin Manolache wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Costin Manolache wrote:
Or even better - since jakarta has a single PMC, it could also have
a single
list of committers ( most of them in the single PMC ).
Each PMC member can vote about any jakarta issue -
I'd propose that we move JCS in this
direction, if the JCS developers push for a 1.0 release inside
turbine-jcs and we make the transition into a Jakarta project with
this
1.0 release (which would IMHO a fine reason to do so).
Regards
Henning
On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 17:
On 8 Dec 2003, at 11:10, Christopher Lenz wrote:
Am 08.12.2003 um 09:03 schrieb Stefan Bodewig:
Can anybody with a better memory for commons than I have recap why the
httpclient traffic list has been split off? Did the httpclient
developers want a list of their own or have the developers for the
On 4 Dec 2003, at 22:35, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
From a Jakarta PMC perspective, I think that we should cease to support
Sub-sub-projects with the exception of commons.*
i think that it depends on what's meant by sub-sub-projects :)
i'm happy for a single sub-project to create many different pr
On 5 Dec 2003, at 09:10, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 20:43, Daniel Rall wrote:
Given Robert's description of his experience with the Incubator, I'm
for the
Jakarta Commons to gather some community (direct drop rather than
sandbox
route), with the goal of an eventual prom
On 4 Dec 2003, at 08:17, Daniel Rall wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
[I like "Turbineers". :-) ]
>
I am one of them, and I did some discussion about JCS @ ApacheCon
with
Martin Poeschl (who seems to do the odd fix to JCS because he uses
it in
Torque)
On 4 Dec 2003, at 19:28, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, robert burrell donkin wrote:
(i'm a little inclined towards db but) i'd support a proposal from the
JCS team for a future in either db or jakarta (along the lines
outlined
above). guys - have you come to any opinions ab
IMHO the incubator is having some political difficulties at the moment
and (from my experience of projects being incubated) it doesn't really
help with gathering more developers.
having read the thread so far, here's my feelings:
1. i feel strongly that JCS should not continue as a turbine
sub
some bedtime reading for those people considering (or soon to be
considering) whether to accept pmc membership:
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=2642
we really need a much bigger pmc. please say yes :)
- robert
--
the problem
---
1. it's hard to keep track of which illustrious former pmc member's
have not been nominated and which no longer feel they are not able to
serve on the pmc.
proposal
create a new class of jakartaens: pmc alumni consisting of senior
jakarta figures (typically ex-p
On 1 Dec 2003, at 12:51, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
[I like "Turbineers". :-) ]
or turbinauts as in 'jason and the turbinauts' ;)
If JCS really catches on, we can still move it back to Jakarta as
"Jakarta JCS".
if JCS really catches on, they might demand a top level ASF project.
who knows!
-
On 1 Dec 2003, at 09:57, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
I agree to Henri JCS could need more publicity!
luckily enough it's apache newsletter time!
i know from personal experience that writing up something for the
newsletter really does generate interest. JCS sounds like something
that people would b
On 1 Dec 2003, at 05:11, Scott Eade wrote:
Without knowing too much, should perhaps "JCS to db top level" and
"JCS to db commons" also be considered options?
definitely :)
Of the available options below I have selected jakarta commons more by
excluding the other options than because of some p
On 30 Nov 2003, at 20:41, robert burrell donkin wrote:
sorry, missed one and probably
[ ] leave JCS within turbine
[ ] JCS to apache commons
[ ] JCS to jakarta commons
[ ] JCS to jakarta top level
[ ] JCS to incubator
[ ] something else (please specify)...
ps
before i get flamed (once again
(we've done some talking on the pmc list and turbineers have discussed
this in the past but since it's not really confidential i'm starting
this thread to give everyone a chance to participate.)
some information about Turbine-JCS:
* JCS has no release
* other apache products depend on JCS
* JCS
hi phil
IIRC infrastructure is the right place to submit patches for the main
site.
- robert
On 23 Nov 2003, at 00:01, Phil Steitz wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
Isn't this something that should go somewhere off of here:
http://www.apache.org/dev/
rather than under Jakarta?
I thought about adding
(i know that people have different opinions about decanting content
from jakarta upwards but i'm not sure anyone feels strongly enough to
force votes but)
when people are moving material from the jakarta site to the main ASF
site could they please ensure that they include an URL to the newer
m
will all jakarta committers please ensure that there apache.org email
account is set up so that it forwards mail to an account that they
read. this is very easy to configure - just log on to cvs.apache.org
using ssh and then edit the .forward file. (one way to do this is to
use vi.
type
> vi
On 9 Nov 2003, at 22:01, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
Mostly, I'm trying to ascertain the best strategies for donations that
will be arising in the near future from projects that are now
relicensed using a BSD style license (portions of Colt and RngPack). I
am working through details with these indiv
hi mark
IMHO there are two different issues here.
1. what's the right thing to do legally...
i don't recall any problems with including BSD licensed source
(providing that the license is followed which probably means adding the
appropriate credits) but the right place to ask this question is
hi todd
it's hard to diagnose this kind of thing without more details (it's
possible that your connection or the server was slow when you tried to
connect) but here's something you might try: first checkout the module and
then update to the particular version you require.
- robert
On Thursday
On Saturday, October 4, 2003, at 05:05 PM, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 08:27:50 -0400
otisg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thank you for the promptness!
Okeydoke. By the way, would it be possible for you to
update "committers" module: /board/committie-info.txt
?? (You have a sufficient
hi otis
IIRC the current policy is that any jakarta committer who wants access to
the site module will be granted it on request. i'd like to encourage
people to take an active interest in maintaining and improving the site so
i'd hope that you'll ask for jakarta-site karma. since you're a pmc m
ken
i don't suppose that you've got a few word-of-wisdom about ApacheCon that
you'd like to contribute (so they can be put in the news section and
posted to announcement) have you?
- robert
On Thursday, September 4, 2003, at 09:05 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Brian McCallister wrote:
Act
i like the logo. (unless someone beats me to it) i'll add a news item as
well.
if someone could let us know when sessions are available, then we can
change to a logo with 'sessions-now-available' byline and probably post
something to announcements as well. (it'd be cool if someone involved wit
i've just committed some pretty significant changes to the download pages
on the jakarta website. as some of you will already be aware, the ASF has
to pay for bandwidth and this means that it's very important to move from
the old system of release directories to the new mirrored ones.
from the
On Wednesday, July 23, 2003, at 02:15 AM, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Thank you for the comment, Robert.
TO tell the truth, my original motivation to arise this
issue was concering to the upcoming newsletter.
I published the final "Jakarta Newsletter" in early
this month and I found I made some mista
jakarta came round to having two pages for mail subscriptions after having
years of regular problems with people joining the lists who had no idea
about how to behave. the pages are user unfriendly but the old solution
(ie publically and vocally humiliating posters on list) was worse (since
it
ion subproject sponsor?
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 21:32:36 +0100
From: robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Jakarta General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jakarta General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Monday, July 7, 2003, at 01:14 PM, Robert Simpson wr
On Monday, July 7, 2003, at 01:14 PM, Robert Simpson wrote:
I am surprised there isn't more interest in a common internationalization
framework within Jakarta. But then I have been assuming that there are
non-English-speaking "members" in Jakarta, not just "committers" and
other users of the
On Wednesday, July 9, 2003, at 03:01 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
On 7/7/03 2:09 PM, "robert burrell donkin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
XMLBeans feels (to me) like a jakarta component but if xml are happy to
manage it, i'd say that it'd probably work out easier that way
FWIW i think that the original arguments which lead to the creation of the
vendors page are still relevant. it's very hard for any folks here to
judge the merit (or otherwise) of companies providing support. on the
other hand, there was a definite demand from users and vendors for a
dating serv
Subject: Jakarta Newsletter Issue 9)
robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
it's about time for people to start thinking about the jakarta
newsletter.
once again, it will be collated on the wiki. you can find it at:
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaNewsl
---
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 18:28:59 +0100
(Subject: Jakarta Newsletter Issue 9)
robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
it's about time for people to start thinking about the jakarta
newsletter.
once again, it will be collated on the wiki.
n, 23 Jun 2003, Mark Womack ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Is there a target date for completion?
-Mark
- Original Message -
From: "robert burrell donkin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jakarta General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:28 AM
Subje
AFAIK (hopefully someone will correct me if i'm wrong) EL is an
implementation of a standard (JSP2.0 expression language) whereas JEXL is
an extended version of the language with velocity-inspired features.
- robert
On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 11:58 AM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Someone cares to
it's about time for people to start thinking about the jakarta newsletter.
once again, it will be collated on the wiki. you can find it at:
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaNewsletterDrafts/Issue9
i was the guest editor for issue 8 and (if no one else steps up) i'd be
willing
On Monday, June 2, 2003, at 10:14 AM, Danny Angus wrote:
Andy proposed:
I would like to nominate Tetsuya Kitahata to be a Jakarta committer with
rights to jakarta-general.
Given that Tetsuya is doing so much to publicise Jakarta in the "Far East"
and has been maintaining Japanese translations of
i quite like the idea of adding a table giving introductions for related
projects but i know some other people think that the welcome page is too
big already.
opinions, anybody?
- robert
On Saturday, May 24, 2003, at 01:29 PM, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Hi, Robert and all.
applied. many thanks
On Friday, May 30, 2003, at 11:14 PM, Danny Angus wrote:
Andy wrote:
I'd like to propose that Howard Lewis Ship be given jakarta-site
access and
I hereby nominate him for the Jakarta PMC.
+1 to both.
+1 to both
- robert
-
To un
committed. many thanks.
- robert
On Tuesday, May 27, 2003, at 03:20 AM, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that there's typo (webbaster -> webmaster)
at xdocs/site/news.xml and created a patch (zipped).
Please apply this.
Sincerely,
--
Tetsuya Kitahata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
i think that licensing would be the right list to ask on.
i believe that XDoclet would now have to be incubated (rather than going
straight into jakarta). i think that one of the functions of the
incubation process would be to give definite answers on these kinds of
questions.
- robert
On Wed
maybe we could change 'SubProjects' (which is more to do with internal
organization at apache) to something more positive like 'Jakarta Is'. that
would make it easier for projects who want to retain an association with
jakarta to keep their listing.
- robert
On Wednesday, March 19, 2003, at 01
this page contains more detailed advice about setting up the mirroring:
http://cvs.apache.org/~bodewig/mirror.html
- robert
On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 03:59 AM, Kurt Schrader wrote:
Google says:
http://www.apache.org/dev/mirrors.html
-Kurt
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Than
IMHO it's quite a bit more involved that preparing a old-style release.
i'm currently preparing a revised release procedure document for commons.
this will contain detailed instructions on how i mirrored the recent
releases i cut.
- robert
On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 02:38 AM, Andrew C. Ol
please submit a patch for the vendor page :)
- robert
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 08:24 PM, Gary Gwin wrote:
Friends,
We would like to be considered for a complete solution provider listing:
company name/website: Cafésoft
http://www.cafesoft.com/services/projects.h
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 07:33 PM, Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
I'd like to join the bandwagon. I would like karma and permission to
advertise major Tapestry releases on the Jakarta main page.
it's not within my power to grant you karma but if you do add a news item
about tapestry to th
On Friday, February 21, 2003, at 09:13 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
the following committers have passed the PMC nomination vote proposed by
sam ruby:
- Danny Angus
- Peter Carlson
- Morgan Delagrange
- Ceki Gülcü
- Dmitri Plotnikov
- Phillip Rhodes
- James
the following committers have passed the PMC nomination vote proposed by
sam ruby:
- Danny Angus
- Peter Carlson
- Morgan Delagrange
- Ceki Gülcü
- Dmitri Plotnikov
- Phillip Rhodes
- James Strachan
- Jason van Zyl
- Ted Husted
- Rod Waldhoff
i'm sending this to let you all k
does anyone know the apache login name for:
- Phillip Rhodes
?
- robert
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 10:41 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Just a view against the 'jump right in and nominate a person at a time'
idea.
+1
FYI: My preference is for monthly batches. My aim
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 10:25 PM, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
Hi Robert,
I think Mark's nomination follows the sprit set by Sam's initial note.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-general&m=104275438831116&w=2
As such, I don't see a need for a separate vote.
my reasoning was purely prag
hi ceki
wouldn't it be less confusing to have a separate vote for mark?
while i'm thinking about it, is general or pmc the right place for votes
of this kind?
- robert
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 09:15 PM, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
At 19:26 13.02.2003 -0500, you wrote:
Charles Burdick wrote:
On Tuesday, February 18, 2003, at 11:42 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Yesterday I received the Jakarta Monthly Newsletter. Interesting as
always,
until I got to the section on PMC nominations. There, I suddenly found my
name listed as elected to the Jakarta PMC. This came as a complete
surprise
On Friday, February 14, 2003, at 12:26 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Charles Burdick wrote:
Selection criteria aside, I nominate Morgan for the PMC.
Now that I think of it, let me just skim through the
Jakarta-Announcements archive from various points last year.
- Danny Angus
- Peter Carlson
- Morgan D
(here's some bits and pieces from the commons.)
Jakarta Commons
===
The major subject for debate this month was the organization of the
mailing lists (again):
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-commons-dev&m=104376872026090&w=2
Jexl
Jexl was promoted from the Sandbox to
On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 03:51 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
I would preffer that all portlet-related technology would be in the same
project and community, with JSP/struts/cocoon specific areas. Maybe an
"commons"-like project.
+1 (providing that andrew's reservations about pluto are
i suppose that really this should be a matter for the jakarta pmc. i have
a feeling that the apache members are very strong about the contents of
public cvs since it exposes them to (possible criminal) liability. how far
should things be allowed to go in the sandbox?
- robert
On Thursday, Octo
hi Rajan
(if you haven't found it already) you might like to read
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/getinvolved.html
and
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/guidelines.html
to give you an idea of the way that jakarta works.
i'd say that the best way to start to contribute to the jakarta community
i
On Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 11:02 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 17:59, robert burrell donkin wrote:
>> the existing list of mailing lists doesn't include some of the newer
>> turbine lists.
>>
>> this patch for jakarta-site2/xdocs/site/ma
the existing list of mailing lists doesn't include some of the newer
turbine lists.
this patch for jakarta-site2/xdocs/site/mail2.xml adds them.
- robert
Index: xdocs/site/mail2.xml
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-site2/xdocs/si
On Wednesday, June 5, 2002, at 04:31 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Rob Oxspring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So is it worth bothering with each month? Feedback wanted! :)
>
> Great job!
+1
thanks for persevering!
> I second Pier's suggestion to peer-review here and send t
(sorry i wanted to delete this rather than send it)
- robert
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, at 10:18 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On Thursday, May 2, 2002, at 09:53 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
> snip>
>
>> I'm +1, but I really want to discuss Costin's ide
201 - 300 of 334 matches
Mail list logo
