On 6/23/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
4.1 in the guidelines repeats the error that I thought was fixed in the
j-c guidelines saying that each package has its own mailing list. If
that is intentional, I think that
On 6/23/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
snip
Don't know what kind of goo 12 would result in or who would use such a
thing ;-)
this has proved impractical in the jakarta commons. i propose we drop
point 12.
-
On 6/23/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
snip
I guess 18 refers to the sandbox? I do not understand what the intent
of this is.
is boils down to the question: does this subproject need it's own
sandbox or will
On 6/25/05, Dean Pickersgill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Phil Steitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip/
I like WebLibs the best.
Phil
... Nah. That's an anagram of 'Wibbles', and it might upset the company
that makes those fashionable toys that are all about
+1
-Rahul
On 7/3/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
--
Martin Cooper
On 7/3/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 to drop this
Phil
robert burrell donkin wrote:
8. Packages are encouraged to either use JavaBeans as core objects, a
JavaBean-style API, or
(Was: Re: [Jakarta Wiki] Update of
DraftCharterForWebComponentCommons by RobertBurrellDonkin) - pasted
here since the title was getting too long ;-)
Thanks for making the changes Robert!
I propose we wrap changes in {{{DELETED}}} and {{{/DELETED}}} tags
(or ADDED tags, as appropriate) rather
On 7/11/05, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Brian sent his CLA in by post about 12 days ago. How can I check whether
it has been received/processed?
From [ http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html ], quotemonitor the file
iclas.txt in the foundation repository/quote
-Rahul
Thanks,
robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/24/2005 08:56:05 AM:
hi rahul
it looks to me like you have some of the subversion settings badly set
(http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.1/svn-book.html#svn-ch-7-sect-2.3.5).
it's quite important that these are set correctly since all the
I recently came across a code contribution [
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35740 ], which
contains the
Copyright [] [name of copyright owner]
line in every file as pointed out in the Appendix at the bottom of [
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt ].
The
/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
P.S.-What list do I subscribe to in order to receive the jakarta site
svn commit messages?
site-cvs@jakarta.apache.org
Thanks! And that will keep reminding us to pick versioning system
agnostic list names for commit lists
On 7/26/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi Jean-Frederic
docs/site/downloads/download_tomcat.html is generated and so these
changes are in grave danger of being reverted next time someone
regenerates the site.
snip/
I also see a pending mod for Stefan's update of
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 16:52 -0400, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 7/26/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
I just regenerated the site, but I avoided reverting those two. I could
easily have committed those; I just didn't know what the etiquette
is.
for me, it's
On 7/27/05, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a big problem with putting people's names beside projects
and components on a public web page. Besides being yet another
thing that needs to be kept up to date, it will only encourage
people to contact the developers directly,
On 7/28/05, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also see a pending mod for Stefan's update of whoweare.html.
My fault. I was on a machine with no Java 5 on it and knew that if I
regenerated the site a whole lot changes
On 8/8/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
IMO the proposal can be finished off pretty quickly but i'm unsure about
the best way to handle the name issue. didn't seem to be any sort of a
consensus. opinions?
snap/
An informal thread was here [
On 8/8/05, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
IMO the proposal can be finished off pretty quickly but i'm unsure about
the best way to handle the name issue. didn't seem to be any sort of a
consensus. opinions?
snap
On 8/9/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
All would be describable (assuming no clashes) as:
Apache Jakarta Web Components
Apache Web Components
There's the option of doing W*4J or something, but we can discuss that
later I think as it's just an altered presentation of the
On 1/12/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
-=-=-=-=
Mostly I'm worried about:
PMC members who are not on pmc@ (there's a handful)
PMC members who are not on general@ (never looked. I will soon)
Inactive committers who are not on the PMC (200+)
snap/
s/Inactive/Active/ ?
Noticed two pending(?) changes when I built the site.
* Velocity folks: downloads_velocity-engine.html and
downloads_velocity-tools.html are generated but not in repository.
* Ortwin: Your blurb on the whoweare page is out of sync in xdocs / docs.
Please check.
-Rahul
On 1/25/06, Ortwin Glück [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
Noticed two pending(?) changes when I built the site.
* Ortwin: Your blurb on the whoweare page is out of sync in xdocs / docs.
I didn't rebuild the site because I am not in a hurry. I am fine when
the change gets
On 3/6/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(feel free to keep discussing names etc, but for the moment I'm going to
go ahead with the one above)
snip/
But do it within a reasonable time frame (atleast post any objections
to JWC in a week -- I think thats reasonable, unless anyone wants
On 3/6/06, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hola,
From Commons:
* EL (dormant?)
Tricky status here, and here's why: the JSP 2.1 spec has EL changes,
and they're significant enough that Jacob Hookum did an almost
cleanroom implementation of EL. He's a newly-elected Tomcat
On 3/6/06, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Regarding sandboxes, the issue is really where the commit mails will go.
An experimental project that hopes to be promoted to community X really
should have its commit messages go to the mailing list for that
community. Other than that,
On 3/7/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
+1 -- its time to establish that there are two equally useful pieces
here, with differing API styles, differing thresholds for involvement
and therefore, potentially attracting differing audiences
On 3/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: sandymac
Date: Mon Mar 6 20:30:58 2006
New Revision: 383773
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=383773view=rev
Log:
Added myself, Sandy McArthur, to whoweare.xml
Modified:
jakarta/site/xdocs/site/whoweare.xml
snip/
Hi
On 3/7/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
snip/
I hope to help in dealing with roC.
Yep, that's my chief point on the thirty four pieces, not two pieces - the
roC still needs solutions. Yet more where we should be thinking about our
On 3/7/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
snip/
I expressed a similar opinion in response to the JLC proposal on
commons-dev. Given that we're in this mess with intermingling threads
on commons-dev@ and general@, forgive me for cross
From the initial email in this thread:
On 3/6/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Additionally we have Jakarta Web Components, which will take on various
bits - including Jakarta Taglibs (can't recall if the Standard Taglib
would go in there or not).
snap/
No, AFAICT. Did you /
On 3/23/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 15:51 -0300, Felipe Leme wrote:
Hi Rahul (and others),
First of all, sorry for the delay (but as they say here Better later
than never :-)
snip/
Thanks for the update.
Still, I think it worths to create
On 3/26/06, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, here goes:
http://people.apache.org/~sebb/source.html
I removed the CVS references.
Note that the #Patches anchor is referenced from getinvolved vendors
so I kept the original heading and added subheadings for the various
aspects.
So long
On 3/27/06, Felipe Leme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rahul,
Cactus hasn't got away yet, but assuming it does, you can sign yourself as a
PMC for the new project - you're help would be greatly welcome.
snip/
Cool, here's to a lot of good stuff happening over at Apache Testing ...
-Rahul
--
On 4/9/06, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Ideally, a sandbox project should be adopted by its closest living
relative, and use that project's list until it grows up. This
[EMAIL PROTECTED] idea looks more like a communal orphanage to me...
Of course if a big bunch of people
On 4/18/06, Felipe Leme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
[ X ] +1 I am favorable to the move and would like to contribute to the new
TLP
[ ] +1 I am favorable to the move but would not be participating in the new
TLP
[ ] +0 it does not matter to me
[ ] -1 I am against it because
On 5/11/06, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hola,
The answer, I believe, is that yes testing.apache.org would welcome
communities built around non-Java test tools. . ie) No indecipherable
code dumps, but if a facet of the testing community wants to build
around a language other
On 5/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: scolebourne
Date: Sat May 13 07:42:59 2006
New Revision: 406115
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=406115view=rev
Log:
Fix IE menu problem
snip/
Thanks for looking into this!
-Rahul
On 5/21/06, Kris Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I made a few commits to the Cache taglib last week but never saw the
resulting email notifications on taglibs-dev. Are those going to a
different list or is something just not configured properly? Thanks for any
insight...
snip/
r408798 did
On 6/6/06, Felipe Leme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
So, answering your question, yes, the project is supposed to support
libraries from another languages. In fact, the existence of such
libraries is an argument for the TLP creation; besides the existing
Cactus and JMeter, we have at least 3
On 6/6/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jun 2006, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
snip/
Per the umbrella concern, the question then becomes what -- if any --
are the mitigating factors that can address such a concern with
regards to this proposal. Based on Hen's email, seems
On 6/9/06, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
snip/
Per the umbrella concern, the question then becomes what -- if any --
are the mitigating factors that can address such a concern with
regards to this proposal. Based on Hen's email, seems like the ball is
still
On 6/11/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 22:50 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
snip/
Per the umbrella concern, the question then becomes what -- if any --
are the mitigating factors that can address such a concern with
regards
On 6/16/06, Felipe Leme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
I think these statements are a good start for the next meeting's
proposal - could someone write an wiki entry for it (or even update
the current resolution)? I'm traveling until Sunday and my internet
connection is pretty bad here, so it
On 6/20/06, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 6/16/06, Felipe Leme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
I think these statements are a good start for the next meeting's
proposal - could someone write an wiki entry for it (or even update
the current resolution)? I'm
On 7/31/06, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Srinath Narasimhan wrote:
Hi
I wonder if anybody can give me an answer about bug 33167. I just need to
know whether it will be released in future releases, if so when? I have
already posted this question as part of the bug trail itself and
On 7/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: dims
Date: Mon Jul 31 14:20:16 2006
New Revision: 427283
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=427283view=rev
Log:
update news and downloads for commons modeler 2.0
Modified:
jakarta/site/docs/index.html
On 12/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: bayard
Date: Mon Dec 4 11:48:24 2006
New Revision: 482318
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=482318
Log:
Added descriptions of what discovery and digester do as we had those in the
email
snip/
Thanks Hen,
-Rahul
On 12/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: bayard
Date: Mon Dec 4 12:34:35 2006
New Revision: 482344
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=482344
Log:
Fixed up the Digester news item to inline the links rather than show them
snip/
The rationale behind showing the
On 12/5/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/4/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log:
Fixed up the Digester news item to inline the links rather than show them
snip/
The rationale behind showing the links
Nice, agreed.
-Rahul
On 12/18/06, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really liked hearing Avik speak up because he's been hurting for
snip/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Reminder: Please svn up /www/jao/ after committing site updates. I
seemed to drag in a few more changes than expected after my update
minutes ago.
-Rahul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
On 3/7/07, Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Matt!
I understand you already are a Jakarta Commons commiter, right?
Wouldn't it be the easiest way to add the project to the Commons
sandbox, make it ready for a release and promote it to the proper
section quickly.
AFAIK all Commons
On 3/7/07, Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/3/7, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 3/7/07, Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Matt!
I understand you already are a Jakarta Commons commiter, right?
Wouldn't it be the easiest way to add the project
On 3/19/07, Jesse Kuhnert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something being a good idea and being required ASF policy are really
very different things.
The suffering is in the implication that I'm not already being
careful. That we're not all supposed to be slightly better than
average developers with
On 3/20/07, Richard Dunne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a technical issue in jakarta tomcat. I have installed jakarta tomcat and can view and execute the JSP
examples and Servlets on http://localhost:8080. I have added the environment variables for CATALINA_HOME and
JAVA_HOME. I have
On 3/25/07, Felipe Leme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote to have Petar Tahchiev as a Jakarta Committer.
snip/
+1
-Rahul
Petar currently works as software engineer in Bulgaria, but was a MSc
student last year, when we proposed porting the Cactus build to Maven
2 as
On 4/8/07, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to step down from being a moderator of some of the Jakarta mailing
lists. Before I do, though, I want to make sure that we have adequate
coverage, which in my mind means at least two moderators for each list.
snip/
Thanks for checking.
On 4/18/07, Rony G. Flatscher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi S///,
It mentions setting the Reply-To to private AT jakarta when sending
the invite - is the private list also the correct place to submit the
initial proposal?
AFAIK, yes!
Just in case the proposal fails, I don't want to cause hurt
On 4/19/07, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/04/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/18/07, Rony G. Flatscher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi S///,
It mentions setting the Reply-To to private AT jakarta when sending
the invite - is the private list also the correct place
+1
-Rahul
On 4/28/07, Scott Eade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Turbine project has been discussing a proposal to the board that the
Turbine projects leave the Jakarta umbrella and become their own top
level project. We are now at the point in the process that calls for a
vote to take place.
On 5/4/07, Nick Burch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All
After lots of discussion within POI, and Jakarta in general, we think POI
is ready to graduate to its own TLP. Thanks to the magic of ApacheCon,
lots of people have been on-hand to help finalise the proposal for this,
which is attached
On 5/23/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip-plan/
If that, or something like it, sounds like a good consensus plan, then
I'm definitely more in favour of that than Commons going to TLP. There
are really only four steps:
Step 0: Consensus.
Step 1: Move 3 projects to the Incubator.
On 5/23/07, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/23/07, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think there's another issue here.
Many of those who voted +1, aren't on the initial list of committers
in the proposal.
Also, many current commons committers aren't on the proposed
On 5/30/07, Peter J Allenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i understand this project is dormant. i would still like to download the
source. i can not seem to locate a download location. if anyone can give
me a pointer that would be very helpful.
snip/
You could go to the repository:
On 6/3/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed. though that page probably needs a bit of a reality check.. The problem
is when someone does
a -1 with reasoning, people tend to stop voting until that vote is switched to
a +1 and if that vote
is switched to a +1 and there are
On 6/7/07, Thomas Vandahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sebb wrote:
Thanks; that's also fixed the missing updates.
I wonder how it happened?
That was me. I could have *sworn* that I copied these over by accident
and as busy to remove them as fast as possible. Is this procedure svn
update - edit -
On 11/16/07, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Earlier today I did some graphs on cross-pollination among Apache
projects and blogged a summary at [1]. Jakarta always ended up
dominating the graphs, so the version on my blog has Jakarta excluded.
If you're interested, there's a
Can we please have these conversations on cactus-dev?
I understand the need for vote threads to begin here. But this one,
for example, is on the wrong list IMO -- there were one or two others
in the same boat.
-Rahul
On 4/2/08, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the scratchpad tree under trunk
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:18 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15/06/2009, Scott Eade se...@backstagetech.com.au wrote:
snip/
[Report edited and submitted by Scott Eade with contributions by many.]
Thanks for doing this!
snap/
Yup, thanks Scott. Seemed early until I saw that the meeting
Here is the draft Board report for this month:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/JakartaBoardReport-current
Please make any desired changes to the above wiki page directly. The
report needs to go out in about 20 hours.
-Rahul
-
Sidebar first: Having fun with the wiki at the moment, can't seem to
create a new page for the October 2009 report (new WikiName added here
[1], trying to create it ultimately ends up here [2] ).
So pasting draft below, more input and/or feedback on general@ please
(by the 18th).
-Rahul
[1]
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 8:26 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/10/2009, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
snip/
=== Releases ===
* None
* BSF 3.0 on Oct 9th
snap/
Yup, will incorporate your edits into the report.
-Rahul
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 11:49 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I created:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2274
snip/
Thanks for that.
-Rahul
On 09/10/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/10/2009, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
Sidebar first: Having fun
[Out of necessity, this is heavily cross-posted. Suggestion is to send
any replies to the gene...@jakarta list only to keep any discussion in
one place.]
We currently have 8 active development lists at Jakarta, each devoted
to a subproject. I've been subscribed to all for a while and based on
my
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Daniel F. Savarese d...@savarese.org wrote:
In message ce1f2ea80910091443t5cad1db0na0663c416cb83...@mail.gmail.com,
Rahul
Akolkar writes:
We currently have 8 active development lists at Jakarta, each devoted
to a subproject. I've been subscribed to all
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Torsten Curdt tcu...@vafer.org wrote:
Care to elaborate a bit?
I'd argue that for the people who care it's no big deal to subscribe
to the various lists. So tuning in is no problem, tuning out once
consolidated indeed is. It's an all-or-nothing. How is
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
A related side note - some time back I think there was a request to shut
down the slide user and dev lists, but that slipped off the radar. Is that
desired now?
snip/
ISTR some discussion but its been a while. Before I go
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Roland Weber ossf...@dubioso.net wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
A related side note - some time back I think there was a request to shut
down the slide user and dev lists, but that slipped off the radar. Is that
desired now?
At the time when we retired Slide,
, in the order they came up:
* Merging of user lists
* Viability of a JMeter TLP
* Moving ecs, oro and regexp to Commons
Of the three items above, I'll pick up on the ecs, oro and regexp move
to Commons in a new thread, in another week or two.
-Rahul
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Rahul Akolkar
[Suggestion is to please reply to the gene...@jakarta list only]
This is a vote to consolidate the development lists at Jakarta into
one development and one notifications list. For background including
timing, anticipated benefits and some discussion, see proposal [1]
thread.
[ ] +1
[ ] -1
I generally want to stay out of this vote thread till it runs its
course and I do appreciate the viewpoints expressed so far. Since
there is a question posed here, I'll try to respond briefly below ...
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:00 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19/10/2009, Rahul Akolkar
Hi Rony,
Please see clarification request below.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Rony G. Flatscher
rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 19/10/2009, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
[Suggestion is to please reply to the gene...@jakarta list only]
This is a vote
-binding +1s and 3 non-binding -1s.
-Rahul
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
[Suggestion is to please reply to the gene...@jakarta list only]
This is a vote to consolidate the development lists at Jakarta into
one development and one notifications
Please start a new email thread if you need to reply (VOTE threads
have special significance and its important to keep unrelated posts
out of these threads). See below ...
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Xavier Delgado xavier.delg...@free.fr wrote:
Hello,
I'm flatted to be in your list, but I
[Relaying result to all lists]
The vote to merge dev lists at Jakarta has passed with the following
binding votes cast:
5 +1s:
Felipe Leme
Daniel Savarese
Vadim Gritsenko
Rahul Akolkar
Stephen Colebourne
2 +0s:
Sebastian Bazley
Rony Flatscher
2 -1s:
Thomas Vandahl
Torsten
I'm not attending, but happen to be in Santa Clara so thinking of
driving up one of these evenings.
Wondering if anyone else is around and when, so I can decide whether
to show up Tues. or Wed. evening :-)
-Rahul
-
To
The existing development mailing lists for Jakarta subprojects (BCEL,
BSF, Cactus, ECS, JCS, JMeter, ORO, Regexp and retired subproject
Slide) are merging.
Two new lists will be soon be created, one for development discussions
and another for notifications (such as SVN, Bugzilla, JIRA, Gump).
Happy 2010 all :-)
New year, new report. Please add any content to the template posted on
the wiki by Sunday, 17th Jan, 2 pm EST (thats one day before the
deadline, giving me enough time to ship it etc.):
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/JakartaBoardReport-January2010
Thanks,
-Rahul
This is cross-posted to reach most of the potentially interested
folks, please reply to the gene...@jakarta.a.o mailing list.
Quick recap, Jakarta retired Slide in Nov '07 and most of Taglibs in
Oct '09 (barring three that moved to Tomcat -- for the purpose of this
email, Taglibs refers to the
This is cross-posted, please use your discretion to respond to the
relevant list(s). At a suitable time, I'll try to collate replies in a
summary post to gene...@.
We have three Jakarta sub-projects that have been discussion points
for moving elsewhere (viz. ECS, ORO and Regexp). For example, the
To summarize this thread, consensus seems to be to move both to the Attic.
I will proceed to call a formal vote today, which will be held on the
gene...@jakarta list.
-Rahul
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
This is cross-posted to reach most
This is a vote (or more correctly, two independent votes) to move
Jakarta Slide and Jakarta Taglibs to the Apache Attic, based on the
outcome of the recent discussion.
Since neither may have enough PMC members active, this vote will be
held by lazy consensus.
If you object, please also provide a
Please provide any input for our April report within a week (by April
14th). I've added the template for April to the wiki. In case you're
having trouble with the wiki, please just reply to this email with the
suggested content for the board report.
The template is supposed to render here (maybe
Last call, folks. Anything else of note?
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/JakartaBoardReport-current
-Rahul
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
Please provide any input for our April report within a week (by April
14th). I've added the template
Attic folks -
I'd like to inform the Attic PMC that the Jakarta PMC has voted to
move the following projects to the Apache Attic:
* Jakarta Slide: http://jakarta.apache.org/slide/
* Jakarta Taglibs: http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/
I am hereby requesting the Attic PMC to take over the
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:11 AM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
Attic folks -
I'd like to inform the Attic PMC that the Jakarta PMC has voted to
move the following projects to the Apache Attic:
* Jakarta Slide: http://jakarta.apache.org/slide/
* Jakarta Taglibs: http
If anyone wants to make any final edits, you have ~6 hours:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/JakartaBoardReport-current
-Rahul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Closing alexandria and slide user lists has been a TODO, we never
followed through with the infrastructure folks.
I will open an INFRA ticket to close these with appropriate forwards
in place (gene...@jakarta and gene...@attic respectively).
-Rahul
[Please reply to gene...@jakarta or atleast include it]
Jakarta has two mailing lists that were at some point relevant to the
Tomcat folks and have been unused since Nov '02. I am proposing we
close the lists, with forwards in place to d...@tomcat.
If there are compelling reasons to maintain the
As indicated below, I will now be requesting infra close these lists
with qmail forwards to d...@tomcat.
-Rahul
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
[Please reply to gene...@jakarta or atleast include it]
Jakarta has two mailing lists that were
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
Closing alexandria and slide user lists has been a TODO, we never
followed through with the infrastructure folks.
I will open an INFRA ticket to close these with appropriate forwards
in place (gene...@jakarta
Added [VOTE] prefix to subject to make sure its understood there is an
ongoing vote in this thread.
-Rahul
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 11:53 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
[Third time lucky?]
Please review and vote on the BSF 3.1 release.
The artifacts are available at:
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
