On 10:44 Wed 12 Nov , Michael Hammer wrote:
* Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081112 00:46]:
What issues do you see with having a wiki?
Pages of poor quality with wrong informations.
The wiki already exists and is popular, so these already happen. Even if
it's not official it says
On 16:52 Tue 11 Nov , Joe Peterson wrote:
As for Wikipedia, there is always the fear that the info will be
incorrect, but time has shown that wikis tend to be very accurate and
get corrected quickly when not.
A page's likelihood of correctness is roughly inversely proportional to
its
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:45:32 -0500
Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are others feelings on this? What issues do you see with having
a wiki? Do you see anyway to resolve the issue you see with us
having a wiki?
What will policy on articles that are
Jan Kundrát wrote:
kashani wrote:
How easy is it to checkout current GDP docs
Append ?passthru=1 to the end of the URL.
and make changes to them?
I take it you want to make a patch. In such case, edit the file and
submit the diff via Bugzilla.
Cheers,
-jkt
Or use anoncvs for
Are you considering to replace the mediawiki with a different wiki system such
as moinmoin?
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 7:49:58 am Michael Hammer wrote:
* Gokdeniz Karadag [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081112 13:06]:
Petteri Räty demis ki::
Michael Hammer wrote:
We should develop some kind of
Michael Hammer wrote:
The wiki can be a staging ground for user contributed documents, which can
become part of official docs after a review and cleanup by developers.
...as long as they use a compatible license, is not the case right now
(and never was, IIRC).
That's the way I intended my
Michael Hammer wrote:
* Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081112 00:46]:
What are others feelings on this?
I like the idea!
What issues do you see with having a wiki?
Pages of poor quality with wrong informations.
Do you see anyway to resolve the issue you see with us having a
* Gokdeniz Karadag [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081112 13:06]:
Petteri Räty demis ki::
Michael Hammer wrote:
We should develop some kind of review process and at least the
possiblity to lock and hide pages of poor quality. In the most cases
the howtos are related to some herds. What if we have a
Petteri Räty demis ki::
Michael Hammer wrote:
* Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081112 00:46]:
What are others feelings on this?
I like the idea!
What issues do you see with having a wiki?
Pages of poor quality with wrong informations.
Do you see anyway to resolve the issue you see
Gokdeniz Karadag wrote:
The wiki can be a staging ground for user contributed documents, which can
become part of official docs after a review and cleanup by developers.
. . . no, I'd think not.
It takes time and effort to produce one of our polished, professional
documents. That's duplicating
Josh Saddler wrote:
It takes time and effort to produce one of our polished, professional
documents. That's duplicating the time and effort that it takes to write
a decent wiki article -- pointless duplication.
One of the things I'm hearing from just about every other user and
developer is
Jan Kundrát wrote:
Michael Hammer wrote:
The wiki can be a staging ground for user contributed documents,
which can
become part of official docs after a review and cleanup by developers.
...as long as they use a compatible license, is not the case right now
(and never was, IIRC).
That's
kashani wrote:
How easy is it to checkout current GDP docs
Append ?passthru=1 to the end of the URL.
and make changes to them?
I take it you want to make a patch. In such case, edit the file and
submit the diff via Bugzilla.
Cheers,
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub more beer /dev/mouth
* Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081112 00:46]:
What are others feelings on this?
I like the idea!
What issues do you see with having a wiki?
Pages of poor quality with wrong informations.
Do you see anyway to resolve the issue you see with us having a
wiki?
We should develop some
On 12.11.2008 11:44, Michael Hammer wrote:
* Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081112 00:46]:
What are others feelings on this?
I like the idea!
What issues do you see with having a wiki?
Pages of poor quality with wrong informations.
Do you see anyway to resolve the issue you see
So, gentoo-wiki.com went down for a awhile and took something away from
our users something that is useful. Its back now, but I think we should
consider having our own official wiki that our users can contribute to.
We already have something very similar to this on the forums, and this
would just
Mark Loeser wrote:
What are others feelings on this? What issues do you see with having a
wiki? Do you see anyway to resolve the issue you see with us having a
wiki?
+1! I have set up several wikis for work projects and used many others
to great benefit. Even those (on my work projects)
Mark Loeser wrote:
So, gentoo-wiki.com went down for a awhile and took something away from
our users something that is useful. Its back now, but I think we should
consider having our own official wiki that our users can contribute to.
We already have something very similar to this on the
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:45:32 -0500
Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, gentoo-wiki.com went down for a awhile and took something away from
our users something that is useful. Its back now, but I think we should
consider having our own official wiki that our users can contribute to.
We
Mark Loeser wrote:
So, gentoo-wiki.com went down for a awhile and took something away from
our users something that is useful. Its back now, but I think we should
consider having our own official wiki that our users can contribute to.
We already have something very similar to this on the
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:45:32 -0500
Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are others feelings on this? What issues do you see with having
a wiki? Do you see anyway to resolve the issue you see with us
having a wiki?
What will policy on articles that are horribly dangerous or outright
Hi,
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:45:32 -0500
Mark Loeser[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are others feelings on this? What issues do you see with having
a wiki? Do you see anyway to resolve the issue you see with us
having a wiki?
What will policy on articles that are
Mark Loeser wrote:
So, gentoo-wiki.com went down for a awhile and took something away from
our users something that is useful. Its back now, but I think we should
consider having our own official wiki that our users can contribute to.
We already have something very similar to this on the
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 08:39:41PM -0600, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
I am throwing this out there, can we ask Mike Valstar for a dump of all his
stuff, slap it on gentoo hardware under a wiki.gentoo.org link?
It could be a community building experience and offering the
stability of gentoo hardware
24 matches
Mail list logo
