and will let you know
> when i get a response.
>
> if you want a plain kernel to patch
>
> emerge vanilla-sources.
>
> IIRC win4lin only works on 2.4 kernels.
>
> > --
>
> --
> Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
they have patches for 2.6.11.
how do you
ll a little unclear as to what
>kernel source I should apply the base patchset to.
The patchsets are applied on top of the vanilla sources.
> I want to rebuild
>the 3.18.8 kernel to double check it's free of the bug...
Ta
gt;> module.
> >>>>
> >>>> as i did:
> >>>>
> >>>> CONFIG_RT2X00=m
> >>>> CONFIG_RT2X00_LIB=m
> >>>> CONFIG_RT2X00_LIB_USB=m
> >>>> CONFIG_RT2X00_LIB_FIRMWARE=y
> >>>> # CONFIG_RT2400
some
>>>>> of the other alternatives, besides the genkernel, which I'm not
>>>>> interested in using, are vanilla-sources available in the portage
>>>>> tree, and the sources available on kernel.org.
>>>>> I'd appreciate being g
That worked! I had to go back to vanilla-sources-2.6.11.11 to get full SMP support (Win4Lin issue) but the kernel patched correctly and loaded the MKI module. It's a bummer that I can't use gentoo-sources, or "win4lin-sources" (wherever they are), for this. I was hoping
On Freitag, 4. Januar 2008, Grant wrote:
> > > Where does this x.x.24 kernel come from? I did a
> > > recent emerge sync and when I do emerge -pv
> > > gentoo-sources portage comes up with x.x.22-r9.
> >
> > But Grant is trying to use vanilla-sources.
>
&g
--- Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Where does this x.x.24 kernel come from? I did a
> > > recent emerge sync and when I do emerge -pv
> > > gentoo-sources portage comes up with x.x.22-r9.
> >
> > But Grant is trying to use vanilla-sources.
&g
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 14:18:23 -0800 (PST), maxim wexler wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ emerge -pv vanilla-sources
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> [ebuild N] sys-kernel/vanilla-sources-2.6.22.9
> USE=&qu
On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 18:50:56 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> I'm trying to do something with a vanilla kernel from kernel.org. Under
> Processor type and features/Processor family, there are only a handful of
> choices, whereas my portage-installed gentoo-sources lists many more.
>
ad issues with the additional features too. Some of the USB serial
> > devices don't get detected. But this is fixed by disabling the Gentoo
specific
> > options. I may be wrong but I think they're just configuration patches, not
the
> > actual kernel sources. I do use th
Neil,
(a) Should I download the vanilla 3.18.1 kernel sources and apply all the
gentoo-sources tar-ball patches in numerical order??
(b) I tried downloading the vanilla 3.18.8 kernel. But of course the
earlier gentoo-sources 3.18.1 - 3.18.6 patches don't apply cleanly... Will
I get to the
> >> emerge gentoo-sources (space) 2.6.11 is it?
> >>
> >
> > emerge -av " >
> > will get you the latest version prior to 2.6.11, which is a 2.6.9
> > revision for gentoo-sources. 2.6.11 is still in vanilla sources.
> >
> > emerge -av "
In my stable machines I only have two keyworded packages:
sys-kernel/dracut
sys-kernel/vanilla-sources
The vanilla-sources package will always be unstable, apparently, so
nothing to do there. However, I whish dracut got stabilized at some
point.
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Profesor de asignatura,
shouldn't really matter (and I
> don't think they'd touch this part of the code anyway). Personally I'd
> make the patches against the vanilla sources.
That's just what I'm doing, for these reasons. I'm not even sure Gentoo
maintains a git repository with
t; For rt73usb no firmware is needed. Just use vanilla kernel built-in
>>>>>> module.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> as i did:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CONFIG_RT2X00=m
>>>>>> CONFIG_RT2X00_LIB=m
>>>>>
o use this driver, and for vanilla-sources-3.2.7 the
results are similar as with the acpi4asus package.
However, for vanilla-sources-3.2.9 the only key that is doing
anything seems to be Fn-F1 which says 'button/sleep' (using
acpi_listen) but actually just turns on the screen save
vanilla-sources (not
gentoo-sources). So do I need to set ALSA_CARDS when using
vanilla-sources too?
The GWN seems clear:
"for users using the in-kernel drivers, they
should now properly set that variable"
I think that the other alsa packages must be aware of it. Anyway I think
I assumed it was because
> >
> > they
> >
> > > > referred to old modules or
> > > >
> > > > > something.
> > > > >
> > > > > But having downloaded and booted into
> >
> > Knoppix and run
> >
>
files: 31,219 kB
Homepage:http://www.kernel.org/ http://www.gentoo.org/
Description: Full sources including the Gentoo patchset for the
2.4 kernel tree
License: GPL-2
sys-kernel/vanilla-sources
Latest version available: 2.6.15.1
Latest version installed: [ Not Ins
> >I grab my sources directly from kernel.org and then apply the patch
> >from grsecurity.org. Then I can choose what security features to
> >enable, and it's a little adventure
Rumen Yotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Better to use 'hardened-sources
Hello!
As suspend/resume doesn't work with the kernel shipped with
Dapper, I'd like to try using the suspend2 kernel patch from
<http://suspend2.net/>. But the patch cannot be applied cleanly
against the Ubuntu sources.
Because of that, I'd like to use a vanilla kernel. B
m is also known as bug #291389.
>>> I see with top in another virtual terminal that rm uses 100% CPU. Is
>>> there any way to continue the installation?
>>>
>>>
>> Maybe try a different version of gentoo-sources?
>> Dale
>>
>> :-) :-
they referred to old modules or
> something.
>
> But having downloaded and booted into Knoppix and run make menuconfig on
> that i have confirmed that kernel seems to have 10's of TV card chipset
> drivers availible to compile whereas gentoo-sources/vanilla-sources emerged
> on my
'm too far behind for this. A search for
"vanilla-sources", another supposedly "easier"
alternative, led me to kernel.org and 2.6.16, a patch.
You have sucessfully build a kernel, you only forgot to set some
options at the bootloader, you don't need other sources, you j
I have a quastion related to vanilla-sources kernel.
After upgrading vanilla-sources from 2.6.26 to 2.6.28_rc2 I am not
able to boot anymore. I tried playing with menuconfig couple of times,
but couldn't find what I have to change in order to make it work
again.
The error message while bo
Well, I'm using the gentoo-sources (2.6.13) and was able to get the patch to apply. The problem is that I don't have the Netraverse option in menuconfig after patching the kernel. Is there a trick for getting this to work?John Jolet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: you have to
et.
>> I've been running upstream's git for a while (currently on 4.4.26).
>>
>> --
>> Rich
>>
> Would a Gentoo .config work with the upstream "vanilla" 4.4.26 kernel?
> I know Gentoo does some patching to the upstream sources and menucon
On Tuesday 31 March 2015 16:45:08 Bob Wya wrote:
> Neil,
>
> (a) Should I download the vanilla 3.18.1 kernel sources and apply all the
> gentoo-sources tar-ball patches in numerical order??
>
> (b) I tried downloading the vanilla 3.18.8 kernel. But of course the
> earlier
Hi there,
long ago i installed a 2.6.24 kernel in /usr/src manually. I had added the
line "sys-kernel/vanilla-sources-2.6.24" (without quotes) to the file
/etc/portage/profile/package.provided. There is no kernel in
/var/lib/portage/world... This may be related to the fact i rece
may get release candidates and betas but only when they're
proven to work, or work better.
I don't wand to mask all rc/alphas/betas for all packages, but only for some.
The aim is to be able to use eg vanilla-sources versioned with 2.25, 2.25.1,
2.25.2, 2.25.3, 2.26. 2.26.1 whil
have a ~
Then you may get release candidates and betas but only when they're
proven to work, or work better.
I don't wand to mask all rc/alphas/betas for all packages, but only
for some.
The aim is to be able to use eg vanilla-sources versioned with 2.25,
2.25.1,
2.25.2, 2.
Marko Kocić wrote:
I have a quastion related to vanilla-sources kernel.
After upgrading vanilla-sources from 2.6.26 to 2.6.28_rc2 I am not
able to boot anymore. I tried playing with menuconfig couple of times,
but couldn't find what I have to change in order to make it work
again.
The
On Sunday, 31 December 2017 18:46:06 GMT Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2017-12-31 01:56, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > If you don't mind my asking, what factors make you prefer vanilla to
> > gentoo sources? (I assume that's what you use.)
>
> One reason is security fix
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Peter Weilbacher
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> after successfully using kernel 4.0.5 (vanilla-sources) for a while, I
> upgraded to 4.1.5 last week and 4.1.6 today. I cannot boot either of
> them. On the screen I see
>
>Decompressing Linux..
Hi Alexander,
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Peter Weilbacher
> wrote:
> >
> > after successfully using kernel 4.0.5 (vanilla-sources) for a while, I
> > upgraded to 4.1.5 last week and 4.1.6 today. I cannot boot ei
patched or vanilla should make no difference in this case.
using a different scheduler like in the ck-patches could make a difference.
Yes I suppose it could. My point is only that 1000Hz is the officially
recommended setting for a desktop machine even for the vanilla sources.
--
T.G.
o you might have to report it with the
> maintainer of the -ck sources, or switch to vanilla for the testing.
> But either way it seems like a kernel bug to me...
>
> -Richard
Yep, I will try initramfs on the problematic PC tomorrow.
Bug-report...Well I'm very confused here. Is
with ath0 (D-Link
DWL-G650 PC card) I get Disabled.
I recently tried the vanilla 2.6.23-14 vanilla sources to see if that
made a difference, but it did not. Of course I used the same .config
file that I am using for my gentoo-sources kernel.
If someone could send me their .config file for
g
ALSA
> drivers I would like to know what changed and why this is required? Is
> this explained somewhere? I am using vanilla-sources (not
> gentoo-sources). So do I need to set ALSA_CARDS when using
> vanilla-sources too?
Flameeyes has been blogging about this. Basically, there are other
getting this to work?John Jolet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: you have to use the vanilla sources and patch with the kernel patch on the win4lin site. they have a patch for 2.6.12, and 2.6.14, though the latest vanilla kernel I saw was 2.6.13... :) I"m running 2.6.12 right now.On Dec 5, 20
w to get the other kernel versions. it's
> > >> emerge gentoo-sources (space) 2.6.11 is it?
> > >
> > > emerge -av " > >
> > > will get you the latest version prior to 2.6.11, which is a 2.6.9
> > > revision for gentoo-sources. 2.6.11
ative
>>>>>> kernels on their gentoo systems. My understanding is that amongst some
>>>>>> of the other alternatives, besides the genkernel, which I'm not
>>>>>> interested in using, are vanilla-sources available in the portage
>>>
e 2.6.21-r4 kernel (I'm
using genkernel, not
> vanilla sources)??
I have nvidia-drivers-100.14.09 running under kernel 2.6.21-gentoo-r4
(manually configured vanilla sources), on both machines actually, and
not a single problem getting those running.
I didn't have any special options for
On Fri, October 31, 2008 10:41 am, Marko KociÄ wrote:
> I have a quastion related to vanilla-sources kernel.
>
>
> After upgrading vanilla-sources from 2.6.26 to 2.6.28_rc2 I am not
> able to boot anymore. I tried playing with menuconfig couple of times, but
> couldn't fin
you have to use the vanilla sources and patch with the kernel patch
on the win4lin site. they have a patch for 2.6.12, and 2.6.14,
though the latest vanilla kernel I saw was 2.6.13... :) I"m running
2.6.12 right now.
On Dec 5, 2005, at 12:33 PM, Tom Smith wrote:
Hi all,
I'
On 2017-12-31 01:56, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> If you don't mind my asking, what factors make you prefer vanilla to
> gentoo sources? (I assume that's what you use.)
One reason is security fixes. Sometimes longterm vanilla already
includes the fixes from mainline, and when it
Hello,
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Raffaele BELARDI wrote:
>I might need to build and run an old 3.x kernel on a Desktop PC for
>some very specific tests. Would Gentoo be a good solution? I see that
>currently gentoo-sources only includes 4.x and 5.x sources.
You might try sys-kernel/vanill
On 05/07/2012 04:13 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> And vanilla-sources just work. Stable. Even with suspend to ram and ati
> drivers.
That confuses me. Are you saying the gentoo-sources don't 'just work'?
;>>
>>> Under Gentoo, using 3.10.7, no such luck. Build the driver, insmod it,
>>> and NetworkManager suddenly thinks there's a *wired* NIC present. The
>>> Yoga 13 doesn't have a wired NIC.
>>
>> Eh? That is weird. Have you tried vanilla-sources to take gentoo
>> patchset out of the equation?
>
> I have not. I'll try that next.
>
Tried with vanilla 3.10.11 and vanilla 3.11.0. Same symptoms.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
two sides of the same coin.
>
Come on, that is what bugfix releases are for.
Gentoo-sources is patched for bugs.
I prefer to use vanilla-sources, so I rely on upstream's bugfix
releases. Currently I use 2.6.27.21. I will stop using 2.6.27.x
when a later version becomes gentoo-stable, and
nt tar balls of gentoo kernel patch-sets actually mean. It would
> nice if the site had a little a bit of Wiki love to make it clearer. For
> example I can't figure out what steps are needed to apply the patchsets, to
> a vanilla kernel, to get a gentoo-sources kernel.
>
> On
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 06:04:33PM +0200, Gerion Entrup wrote:
> My summary then is:
>
> gentoo-sources: vanilla source tree + gentoo-patches (no automatic compiling
> etc.).
>
> gentoo-kernel: take gentoo-sources as source, the kernel .config file from
> Arch Linux and then c
Hi,
when using vanilla kernel 3.7.5 (appropiate kernel headers installed)
emergeing nvidia-drivers 313.18 works fine.
As soon vanilla kernel 3.7.6 are installed the emerge process fails
because the kernel version couldnt be determined.
Both times /usr/src/linux symlinks to the according kernel
ches make.
gentoo-sources vs. vanilla git-clone: could you describe why to prefer
the last one?
thanks!
OPTS="-j2" and "-pipe", but this
> doesn't fix it.
>
> The possible work around I have thought of is just getting the vanilla
> kernel from kernel.org, but the gentoo wiki advise against it, since
> gentoo-sources is a patched kernel.
>
> This is my first post to a mailing list, so I hope it is not to bad! :D
>
> With best regards,
>- TheRedMood
>
awback to using the
vanilla sources? I'm assuming gentoo-sources were patched from them
for a reason.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
I've been using gentoo-sources for a while now.
I remember reading on this list about some users using alternative
kernels on their gentoo systems. My understanding is that amongst some
of the other alternatives, besides the genkernel, which I'm not
interested in using, are vanil
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 06:45:40PM -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> You can use git. I believe gentoo patches are only for config options so if
> you
> configure it with make oldconfig it *should* be the same as using gentoo-
> sources.
Actually no, gentoo-sources aren't van
Marko Kocić wrote:
I have a quastion related to vanilla-sources kernel.
After upgrading vanilla-sources from 2.6.26 to 2.6.28_rc2 I am not
able to boot anymore. I tried playing with menuconfig couple of times,
but couldn't find what I have to change in order to make it work
again.
The
de anyway). Personally I'd
make the patches against the vanilla sources.
-Marco
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
gt; I see with top in another virtual terminal that rm uses 100% CPU. Is
>> there any way to continue the installation?
>>
>>
>
> Maybe try a different version of gentoo-sources?
> Dale
>
> :-) :-)
Vanilla-sources will solve the problem until boot time, unless you have
ext4 partitions.
Cheers
Kad
elf. Maybe the BIOS
> >> has a issue that only affects it when it is being booted from.
> >>
> >> Just my weird thinking.
> >>
> >> Dale
> >>
> >> :-) :-)
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> > 2.6.36 works fine
> > 2.6
> I have the same notebook. The sound worked for me only with 2.6.26. First
> using vanilla 2.26.26-rcX and finally with gentoo-sources-2.6.26.
I switched to gentoo-sources-2.6.26 and the alsa card still cannot work, so can
you give me your .config file please.
Thank you.
--
BR,
Zhou Rui
Brix has been maintaining a suspend2_sources ebuild that handles the patching.
http://dev.gentoo.org/~brix/files/overlay/sys-kernel/suspend2-sources/
dcm
Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-17 04:40]:
- is it possible to patch the gentoo-sources kernel with the suspend2patch? Or will i
ever really understood what difference the gentoo-patches make.
>
> gentoo-sources vs. vanilla git-clone: could you describe why to prefer
> the last one?
>
> thanks!
>
>
>
>
Maybe this will help:
https://dev.gentoo.org/~mpagano/genpatches/about.htm
Dale
:-) :-)
ARDS variable when using
> >> in-kernel drivers in the Gentoo Newsletter. Since I am using
> >> in-kernel ALSA drivers I would like to know what changed and why
> >> this is required? Is this explained somewhere? I am using
> >> vanilla-sources (not gentoo-sources)
I have a build error with latest gentoo-sources (~amd64): # eix -I
gentoo-sources Installed versions: 6.7.6(6.7.6)^bs(10:37:31
02/24/24)(-build -experimental -symlink) 6.7.7(6.7.7)^bs(18:43:20
03/01/24)(-build -experimental -symlink) # eix -I gcc Installed
versions: 13.2.1_p20240210(13)^t(17
ions will have influence. Kernel sources
have thousands of files and maybe I/O is not fast enough.
I use nice and ionice to make emerge running at the lowest priority
(meaning the least important)
> The possible work around I have thought of is just getting the vanilla
> kernel from kern
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 14:45:32 -0800 (PST), maxim wexler wrote:
> Where does this x.x.24 kernel come from? I did a
> recent emerge sync and when I do emerge -pv
> gentoo-sources portage comes up with x.x.22-r9.
But Grant is trying to use vanilla-sources.
--
Neil Bothwick
Can vegeta
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> Besides:
> ls /usr/portage/sys-kernel/vanilla-sources/
> [...]
Wow! Couldn't have done that myself.
> there is A LOT after .15 - many of them with security fixes.
I'm not gonna repeat myself (again). Thanks for the suggestion, but for
two (alre
o-sources. But the same thing happens with vanilla-sources
(versions 4.8.4)
Does anybody knows why?
--
Andrés Becerra Sandoval
p gentoo-sources shows there are no longer any 2.6.11
kernel in gentoo-sources. You best bets are
emerge =sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.9-r9
or
emerge =sys-kernel/vanilla-sources-2.6.11.11
Note that the patches on Win4Lin's website are version specific.
W
--
"This is advertised as
On 05/02/13 16:56, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
when using vanilla kernel 3.7.5 (appropiate kernel headers installed)
emergeing nvidia-drivers 313.18 works fine.
As soon vanilla kernel 3.7.6 are installed the emerge process fails
because the kernel version couldnt be determined.
Both times
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You have no prob on gentoo-livecd ??? so ... kernel on live aren't
gentoo-sources ... but gentoo-developpement-sources I think ...
just check the kernel version of the livecd ...
so, try to install vanilla sources with the same conf than g
> I'm using ASUS WL-167g USB WLAN (rt73usb) and work well with or without
> WPA_SUPPLICANT.
>
> driver is already integrated in sys-kernel/vanilla-sources (2.6.24-rc5)
Where do you see that driver? I'm giving vanilla-sources-2.6.24-rc6 a
try and I don't see it.
-
Hi Alexandre,
thanks for your reply! :)
Both kernels were compiled the same way prior to emergeing the
nvidia-drivers. In both cases the symlink /usr/src/linux points to
the correct kernel sources...
I also to booted into the kernel for which I want to emerge the
drivers which doesnt make a
include/linux/utsrelease.h
SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-x86
CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
CHK include/linux/compile.h
/usr/src/linux-2.6.29-gentoo-r3/usr/Makefile:41: *** mixed implicit and
normal rules. Stop.
make: *** [usr] Error 2
The same happens with stable gentoo-sources
Am Dienstag, 21. April 2020, 18:28:52 CEST schrieb Ashley Dixon:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 06:04:33PM +0200, Gerion Entrup wrote:
> > My summary then is:
> >
> > gentoo-sources: vanilla source tree + gentoo-patches (no automatic compiling
> > etc.).
> >
> >
2008/7/31 Fernando Antunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> I have the same notebook. The sound worked for me only with 2.6.26. First
> using vanilla 2.26.26-rcX and finally with gentoo-sources-2.6.26.
>
But the gentoo-sources-2.6.26 is unstable now, so may switch to this
kernel
On 06/24/2012 12:13 PM, Samuraiii wrote:
> The driver 295.59 builds just fine against kernel 3.2.12
> So problem _MUST_ be somewhere around kernel.
A perfectly reasonable conclusion. (My own perfectly reasonable conclusions
are often wrong ;)
Maybe you could install vanilla-sources and
Hi,
So just try same think with "sync" and tell us if it work ...
no same situation even with sync. After some time it get freezed.
Perhaps a bug on kernel too, try another kernel : vanilla-sources for
example
vanilla has no gentoo patch, perhaps a bug in this, need to try
gt; Whether its patched or vanilla should make no difference in this case.
> >
> > using a different scheduler like in the ck-patches could make a difference.
>
> Yes I suppose it could. My point is only that 1000Hz is the officially
> recommended setting for a desktop machin
.36 works fine
> 2.6.38-r6/r7 panic
>
> Have noticed that using device drivers as modules allows
> me to boot with memory stick already inserted. This previously would not
> work. But the problem still occurs when stick is hot plugged.
>
> So the issue is half solved At leas
ted from.
> > >
> > > Just my weird thinking.
> > >
> > > Dale
> > >
> > > :-) :-)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> >
> > 2.6.36 works fine
> > 2.6.38-r6/r7 panic
> >
> > Have noticed that using device drivers
fine for hours but sometimes shuts down
> totally and the LED is off and only comes alive again if I unplug and
> insert it.
Test with vanilla-sources so that you can contact the upstream maintainer of
the driver.
Stroller.
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 01:01, S. Schwartz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having a problem using nvidia-kernel-1.0.6629-r5 after the my recent
> kernel-update from gentoo-sources-2.6.15-r1 to gentoo-sources-2.6.16-r3.
> The few things, that are compiled when emerging nvidia-kernel, compil
initialised to what they were in my 4.9.16 running kernel.
I don't use gentoo-sources. Nothing against it, it's just that I got
used to upgrade by hand, once in a while...
But the kernel of gentoo-sources would be patched, if anything. The
vanilla kernel should have the usual penguins.
thanks
Jorge
me as using gentoo-
> > sources.
>
> Actually no, gentoo-sources aren't vanilla kernel while efforts are made
> to avoid including intrusive patches.
>
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~mpagano/genpatches/about.htm
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~mpagano/genpatches
>
> ,
3.5.0 kernel (vanilla-sources has it). It
contains some import fixes.
Helmut.
> > I'm using ASUS WL-167g USB WLAN (rt73usb) and work well with or without
> > WPA_SUPPLICANT.
> >
> > driver is already integrated in sys-kernel/vanilla-sources (2.6.24-rc5)
>
> Where do you see that driver? I'm giving vanilla-sources-2.6.24-rc6
Anybody know how to fix this?
Gentoo 2005.0
AMD64
vanilla sources 2.6.12-rc4
pcHDTV300 / PVR 350
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
the exact version it happened (I don't use
suspend2-sources, I patch vanilla-sources) but if you have a
HyperThreaded CPU, for some reason suspend to disk is now disabled when
you select HT.
This wasn't always the case - I used to have suspend2 and HT both
working together nicely.
Chec
>> In my portage there are only rc for 26. So just add
>> <=sys-kernel/vanilla-sources-2.6.26 to your packages.keywords.
>>
> I ment
On 01/27/2013 01:06 AM, staticsafe wrote:
> I just grabbed vanilla 3.7.4 from kernel.org, the kernel build itself
> went fine but when I did a modules-rebuild, the nvidia module failed to
> build. As requested by the error message:
I had the same problem, I had success with thi
in the Gentoo Newsletter. Since I am using
> >> in-kernel ALSA drivers I would like to know what changed and why
> >> this is required? Is this explained somewhere? I am using
> >> vanilla-sources (not gentoo-sources). So do I need to set
> >> ALSA_CARDS when using v
On 2024-03-02 18:12, ralfconn wrote:
I have a build error with latest gentoo-sources (~amd64): # eix -I
gentoo-sources Installed versions: 6.7.6(6.7.6)^bs(10:37:31
02/24/24)(-build -experimental -symlink) 6.7.7(6.7.7)^bs(18:43:20
03/01/24)(-build -experimental -symlink) # eix -I gcc Installed
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:50:20AM +0100, Penguin Lover Erik squawked:
> I am configuring vanilla-sources right now. But I got a scary security
> warning. So the plan is:
Which security warning are you talking about?
> 5. Disconnect ethernet cable.
Eh, why?
W
--
I couldn't repa
On Thu, 28 Dec 2017 15:16:17 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> It will find an existing config in /boot if you have one named using
> the upstream naming convention (which happens if you install the
> kernel using make install on a vanilla kernel - I'm not sure about
> genkernel
I *think* I know what they are, what risk do I run by using them?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
a
>> WIP in bringing RSBAC back again too.
>
> Does gentoo-sources include the SELinux patches, or was it just being
> forgotten as usual? :)
I think SELinux is included already in vanilla linux. If you refer to
policies, yeah they are but aren't part of hardened so
101 - 200 of 703 matches
Mail list logo
