On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 00:23 +0100, Jacek Poplawski wrote:
> I know nothing about politics and fights between Gimp developers, I
> just want to understand the development process (I use Gimp almost
> everyday, so it's very important to me).
It's not a question of fights and politics.
It's a very
If I understand correctly...
You don't want to apply patch with serious functionality, because
stable release is coming and there is no time for that.
At the same time I noticed incorrect behaviour of UI
(https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643155) which happeneded
month ago, and which wil
Charlie De (charlieco...@yahoo.com) wrote:
> Could you please demonstrate your sincerity by escalating the 'bug' to
> critical? It would demonstrate commitment to really having this in
> 2.10, rather than just 'looking at it'. I think you owe it to the
> developer to make that gesture at the very l
Martin,
Could you please demonstrate your sincerity by escalating the 'bug' to
critical?
It would demonstrate commitment to really having this in 2.10, rather than just
'looking at it'. I think you owe it to the developer to make that gesture at
the
very least.
Good luck with all the work t
Hello,
perhaps everyone can calm down. What is the problem with this bug? If
it is an missing review, then it's OK to move it to 2.10, because we
don't have any developer for doing it. But if it is something with the
patch then Rupert could fix it.
Regards,
Tobias
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Charlie De wrote:
> My criticism is for the whole team involved in these decisions, I don't wish
> to
> single out Martin or ask anyone to quit.
I understand your frustration, but you need to understand why we do
things the way we do. Patches that come in need to
2011/3/16 Charlie De :
> Martin, with all due respect, your focus in releasing 2.8 ASAP should be on
> integrating fixes that are completed, not battling to bring in new
> functionality
> such as layer groups. What's the point of layer groups if the layer transfer
> modes don't work correctly? Mor
2011/3/16 Carol Spears :
> martin, if in, oh, lets say 3 days, March 18, 2011 the majority of your list
> items are not commited, perhaps you should consider stepping aside.
> "releases"
> don't attract developers. look at the history! gimp-1.0 - gimp-1.2, 1997
> thru
> 2000. lots of contribu
ists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
> Sent: Wed, March 16, 2011 6:10:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] [Bug 325564] Use CIE LCH instead of HSL for
> layer
>mode "Color"
>
> On 03/15/2011 08:47 PM, Charlie De wrote:
> > Why?? Rupert Weber finished this last September and
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 06:10:33AM +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> On 03/15/2011 08:47 PM, Charlie De wrote:
> > Why?? Rupert Weber finished this last September and you promised it would
> > be in
> > 2.8. Is this how you show respect for the most stellar effort by a new
> > talent?
> > Shame, t
On 03/15/2011 08:47 PM, Charlie De wrote:
> Why?? Rupert Weber finished this last September and you promised it would be
> in
> 2.8. Is this how you show respect for the most stellar effort by a new talent?
> Shame, truly, shame on you. It's now been 5 years since the issue was first
> reported, y
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 05:34:13PM -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:20:14PM +, Øyvind Kolås wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Jacek Poplawski
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Charlie De
> > > wrote:
> > >> Why?? Rupert Weber finished this la
How about:
This patch seems to have been completed last year; there are no
outstanding issues against it. What needs to be done in order for
this to be integrated?
Chris
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Charlie De wrote:
> Why?? Rupert Weber finished this last September and you promised it wou
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:20:14PM +, Øyvind Kolås wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Jacek Poplawski
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Charlie De wrote:
> >> Why?? Rupert Weber finished this last September and you promised it would
> >> be in
> >> 2.8. Is this how you sh
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Jacek Poplawski
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Charlie De wrote:
>> Why?? Rupert Weber finished this last September and you promised it would be
>> in
>> 2.8. Is this how you show respect for the most stellar effort by a new
>> talent?
>> Shame, trul
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Charlie De wrote:
> Why?? Rupert Weber finished this last September and you promised it would be
> in
> 2.8. Is this how you show respect for the most stellar effort by a new talent?
> Shame, truly, shame on you. It's now been 5 years since the issue was first
> r
Why?? Rupert Weber finished this last September and you promised it would be in
2.8. Is this how you show respect for the most stellar effort by a new talent?
Shame, truly, shame on you. It's now been 5 years since the issue was first
reported, you're going to add another year even though the wo
17 matches
Mail list logo
