Re: TODO for 1.2 release

2000-09-26 Thread Tim Mooney
In regard to: Re: TODO for 1.2 release, Moses P. Milazzo said (at 4:28pm on...: >> Better: >> >> find . -name '*.c' -o -name '*.h' -exec egrep '//' {} /dev/null \; | \ >> grep -v '://' >> >> (to get rid of false

Re: TODO for 1.2 release

2000-09-26 Thread Kevin Cozens
"Moses P. Milazzo" wrote: > Why not: > > grep "//" `find . -name "*.[ch]"` | grep -v 'p://' You should include -print as part of the find statement or else you will wind up getting a list of lines containing C++ style comments without knowing the name of the file that needs to be edited. Cheers

Re: TODO for 1.2 release

2000-09-26 Thread Moses P. Milazzo
> Better: > > find . -name '*.c' -o -name '*.h' -exec egrep '//' {} /dev/null \; | \ > grep -v '://' > > (to get rid of false matches on URLs) Why not: grep "//" `find . -name "*.[ch]"` | grep -v 'p://' (the -o option doesn't seem to work as advertised in the man page) Don't forget that

Re: TODO for 1.2 release

2000-09-26 Thread Kevin Cozens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 26 Sep, Tim Mooney wrote: > >> Grepped through the source and couldn't find any C++ style > >> comments... > > > cc: Error: lighting_ui.c, line 387: Invalid statement. (badstmt) > > // GtkWidget *spinbutton; > > --^ There are a number of C++ style comments. I ran

Re: TODO for 1.2 release

2000-09-26 Thread Tim Mooney
In regard to: Re: TODO for 1.2 release, Austin Donnelly said (at 11:35pm on...: >On Tuesday, 26 Sep 2000, Tim Mooney wrote: > >> @@ -2322,6 +2322,7 @@ >>G_IO_ERROR_NONE, >>G_IO_ERROR_AGAIN, >>G_IO_ERROR_INVAL, >> + G_IO_ERROR_INTR, >>

Re: TODO for 1.2 release

2000-09-26 Thread Austin Donnelly
On Tuesday, 26 Sep 2000, Tim Mooney wrote: > @@ -2322,6 +2322,7 @@ >G_IO_ERROR_NONE, >G_IO_ERROR_AGAIN, >G_IO_ERROR_INVAL, > + G_IO_ERROR_INTR, >G_IO_ERROR_UNKNOWN > } GIOError; This breaks backwards binary compatibility, since the numeric value of G_IO_ERROR_UNKNOWN changes.

Re: TODO for 1.2 release

2000-09-26 Thread egger
On 26 Sep, Tim Mooney wrote: > You need to quote the '*.c', it's getting expanded by the shell before > it ever gets fed to find. :-) Actually that's not the problem since there are no *.c files in the directory I started the search in... Anita:/mnt2/src/gimp # find -name *.c ./libgimp/gimps

Re: TODO for 1.2 release

2000-09-26 Thread Tim Mooney
In regard to: Re: TODO for 1.2 release, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said (at 12:19am on...: >> Perhaps it's been fixed in CVS already, and that's what you're looking >> at? > > No, it's not fixed in CVS but for some reason > find -name *.c | grep "//&quo

Re: TODO for 1.2 release

2000-09-26 Thread egger
On 26 Sep, Tim Mooney wrote: >> Grepped through the source and couldn't find any C++ style >> comments... > cc: Error: lighting_ui.c, line 387: Invalid statement. (badstmt) > // GtkWidget *spinbutton; > --^ > This is from 1.1.26/plug-ins/Lighting. I haven't made the build > proceed any far

Re: TODO for 1.2 release

2000-09-26 Thread Tim Mooney
In regard to: Re: TODO for 1.2 release, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said (at 12:05am on...: >On 26 Sep, Tim Mooney wrote: > >> I'll try build 1.1.26 or some subsequent release on the platforms I >> have access to, but whoever does pre-release builds (Yosh?) should see >>

Re: TODO for 1.2 release

2000-09-26 Thread egger
On 26 Sep, Tim Mooney wrote: > I'll try build 1.1.26 or some subsequent release on the platforms I > have access to, but whoever does pre-release builds (Yosh?) should see > if there's a way to make your compiler (gcc?) warn/error on C++ style > comments. Every single point build of gimp for the

Re: TODO for 1.2 release

2000-09-26 Thread Austin Donnelly
On Tuesday, 26 Sep 2000, Tim Janik wrote: > i think austin even had a patch for this, i'd love to include > it into glib and release 1.2.9 for gimpers. though, what exact > date do you have in mind for 1.2.0? > i don't have austin's email handy, so i'd apprechiate if anyone > would forward this e

Re: TODO for 1.2 release

2000-09-26 Thread Tim Janik
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Tim Mooney wrote: > In regard to: Re: TODO for 1.2 release, Garry R. Osgood said (at 5:38am on...: > > >Nick Lamb wrote: > > > >> > >> Enough hilarity. If you know of something which must be done before > >> 1.2.0 please follow

Re: TODO for 1.2 release

2000-09-26 Thread Tim Mooney
In regard to: TODO for 1.2 release, Nick Lamb said (at 8:21pm on Sep 25, 2000): >Now, I bet a lot of money that Gimp 1.2 wouldn't be released in 2000 >To make me lose, I still remember the announcement for the pre-1.0 party, where S uttered the famous words, "One-point-Oh is

Re: TODO for 1.2 release

2000-09-26 Thread Tim Mooney
In regard to: Re: TODO for 1.2 release, Garry R. Osgood said (at 5:38am on...: >Nick Lamb wrote: > >> >> Enough hilarity. If you know of something which must be done before >> 1.2.0 please follow on to this mail. If you know of a reason why >> we should unfreeze

Re: TODO for 1.2 release

2000-09-26 Thread Rebecca Jean Pedersen
I need to squeeze a little time out of my currently hectic schedule to go back and finish proofreading the help docs. I now have CVS access so I just need to find time and learn how to use CVS and it won't be bad on my part. (if anyone cares about docs that is) bex ps--i know i havent been on IR

Re: TODO for 1.2 release

2000-09-26 Thread Garry R. Osgood
Austin Donnelly wrote: > > B: Plugins > -- > > For plugins, I think we need to take some tough decisions as to which > plugins are supported, and which aren't. I don't know how to do this, > but others have suggested looking at which are mentioned in the > MAINTAINERS file. I would pe

Re: TODO for 1.2 release

2000-09-26 Thread Austin Donnelly
On Monday, 25 Sep 2000, Nick Lamb wrote: > 1. VAGUE: Documentation should be "good" (definition anyone?) > 2. Critical/ Severe bug reports should be fixed or marked down (bug #s?) > 3. VAGUE: Gimp should build out-of-box on lots of systems > 99. Find and #ifdef any debug scribble to console > 100

Re: TODO for 1.2 release

2000-09-26 Thread Garry R. Osgood
Nick Lamb wrote: > > Enough hilarity. If you know of something which must be done before > 1.2.0 please follow on to this mail. If you know of a reason why > we should unfreeze Gimp instead, feel free to let loose. > > 1. VAGUE: Documentation should be "good" (definition anyone?) > 2. Critical/ S

Re: TODO for 1.2 release

2000-09-25 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 20:21:45 +0100 From: Nick Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Enough hilarity. If you know of something which must be done before 1.2.0 please follow on to this mail. If you know of a reason why we should unfreeze Gimp instead, feel free to let loose. I would like to g

TODO for 1.2 release

2000-09-25 Thread Nick Lamb
Right, one of the formal things Linus' little toy project does which allows him to ship only a year or two late is to have a list of stuff that needs doing before release. Of course, none of that stuff gets done, but you can document it and move on. Another toy project, named after that monster w