GIMPers,
Is there a way to create a gradient (black-white) based off a closed lasso
selection? So the resulting gradient would
start black along the edge of the selection and expand out to white in all
directions away from the selection.
My end goal is to create a quick mask that I can blur
On 12/26/2010 07:55 PM, Eric P wrote:
GIMPers,
Is there a way to create a gradient (black-white) based off a closed lasso
selection? So the resulting gradient would
start black along the edge of the selection and expand out to white in all
directions away from the selection.
My end
Hi all,
Quick newbie question. I have a photo that is full bright on one side, the
left; and subdued light on the right. It seems to be an excellent job for
gradient and layers but I'm not sure how to go about getting started.
I checked in tutorials and couldn't find anything on this
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 10:07:46AM -0800, Bill W. wrote:
Hi all,
Quick newbie question. I have a photo that is full bright on one side, the
left; and subdued light on the right. It seems to be an excellent job for
gradient and layers but I'm not sure how to go about getting started.
I
Nem W Schlecht wrote:
Any update on this, Bill?
Thanks for the reminder. Okay, I have uploaded the code to the
Gimp Plug-In Registry, at:
http://registry.gimp.org/plugin?id=4169
You should have a working gimptool-2.0 in order to install it.
Best,
-- Bill
__ __
For what it's worth, I went ahead and implemented a true variable blur filter,
by modifying the blur plug-in code from 2.0. I'll put the code in the plug-in
registry after a little bug-fixing, but anyway, I put together a comparison of
what you get with variable blurring versus what you get with
http://gug.sunsite.dk/pictures/1080149573.png
This is looking really great !!!
Hope to play with it soon.
Thanks
--
Przemek Gawronski gawronskip#at#wp#dot#pl
Linux Registered User 239544UIN:8358522
http://counter.li.org/
On 20 Mar 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
Combining a blurred picture with an unblurred picture using layer mask
seems to work well for me. Of course it's not the same but it should
look reasonably similar.
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Jakub Steiner wrote:
Just create an appropriate selection for the blur
On Po, 2004-03-22 at 09:12 -0800, William Skaggs wrote:
Neither of these techniques work, as you will see if you try to apply them.
When you mix a blurred image with a sharp image, the result does not look like
a less-blurred image, it looks like a sharp image whose contrast has been reduced.
V Po 22. 03. 2004 v 11:38 -0800 pe William Skaggs:
Uh? It works pretty well I'd say:
http://jimmac.musichall.cz/stuff/linearblur.png
To my eyes this image looks sharp in the lower 2/3, and uniformly blurred
in the upper 1/3. What you _do_ get using this method is a nice smooth
On Saturday 20 March 2004 14:38, William Skaggs wrote:
Actually the reality is that Gimp, with the standard plug-ins, does
not have the ability to do this, although there are ways to fake
something that looks sort of like it. The easiest way to get it
would be to modify the blur filter (found
Actually the reality is that Gimp, with the standard plug-ins, does not have the
ability to do this, although there are ways to fake something that looks sort of
like it. The easiest way to get it would be to modify the blur filter (found in
randomize.c in the plug-ins directory) so that the
Hi,
William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually the reality is that Gimp, with the standard plug-ins, does
not have the ability to do this, although there are ways to fake
something that looks sort of like it. The easiest way to get it
would be to modify the blur filter (found in
On 20 Mar 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually the reality is that Gimp, with the standard plug-ins, does
not have the ability to do this, although there are ways to fake
something that looks sort of like it. The easiest way to get it
would be to
Hi Gimpers
I'm looking for tool that would give me a blur efect but with a
gradient intencity. That is at the begining I would have a sharp pic but
gradualy get more blured and more and more ... (going from left to right
for example).
I would be thankful for sugestions on how I can do that in
Przemyslaw Gawronski wrote:
I'm looking for tool that would give me a blur efect but with
a gradient intencity. That is at the begining I would have a
sharp pic but gradualy get more blured and more and more ...
(going from left to right for example).
Make a copy of the layer you want to
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 11:04 +0100, Przemyslaw Gawronski wrote:
Hi Gimpers
I'm looking for tool that would give me a blur efect but with a
gradient intencity. That is at the begining I would have a sharp pic but
gradualy get more blured and more and more ... (going from left to right
for
On Friday 19 March 2004 07:36, craniac wrote:
Przemyslaw Gawronski wrote:
I'm looking for tool that would give me a blur efect but with
a gradient intencity. That is at the begining I would have a
sharp pic but gradualy get more blured and more and more ...
(going from left to right for
Hi,
Jeff Trefftzs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 17:14, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Oh? Actually 1.3 is supposed to read the 1.2 palette and gradient
files directly. Did we break backward compatibility? If so, this should
better be fixed.
Gimp-1.3.20 seems to read the
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 04:01, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
What warnings do you get exactly? Perhaps we could suppress them or
make them more subtle warnings that appear on the console only.
I'm sorry -- I didn't make myself clear (too late at night, I guess.)
The warnings were on the console,
Hi,
Jeff Trefftzs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have just written a couple of little perl scripts to convert existing
gimp-1.2.x palettes and gradients into a form that gimp-1.3.20 finds
acceptable. In the hope that others might find them useful, I have
attached them.
Oh? Actually 1.3 is
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 17:14, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Oh? Actually 1.3 is supposed to read the 1.2 palette and gradient
files directly. Did we break backward compatibility? If so, this should
better be fixed.
Gimp-1.3.20 seems to read the 1.2 palettes and gradients properly, but
it complains
Is it possible to change the text color when using functions like the
Gradient Bevel (Xtns | Script-Fu | Logos )? I can change the background
color, of course, but nothing I try will change the text color. Must I
edit the function directly (if that's even possible)?
--
Mike Thorn
Hi--
It may be in there, but I do not know the vocabulary. I want to do a
gradient with a color on one end and transparent on the other. All the
possible things I see do not do what I want. Anyone help?
--
Thanks--
Jim Clark
___
Gimp-user mailing
Jeff,
I suspect Indira was referring to the results (the
gradients). These you place in your
~/.gimp-1.2/gradients/ directory for an individual
user, or in your /usr/local/share/gimp/gradients/
directory for system-wide access. (both these are
defaults for 1.2 on a unix-like OS - if you
Seth -
I expect you're right. I was thinking of scripts, not
gradients. Thanks for the clarification. You are welcome to
convert the scripts to gimp-perl. Let me know when you're done.
--
--Jeff
Jeff Trefftzs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.tcsn.net/trefftzsHome Page
if I have an image and I want to use the colors of that image, how do i
make a custom gradient?
Thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is nothing good or bad, but thinking makes it so...
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
An easier method:
I have wondered about this myself in connection with palettes,
which often have a nicely selected set of colors already
available. I have built a pair of little perl procs to (1) sort
a palette by value, hue, saturation, or hsv_value,
and (2) create a gradient from
28 matches
Mail list logo
