Hi all,
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 7:09 PM, rich for...@gimpusers.com wrote:
I think you will have to fake it. Draw the curve and keep it as a path.
Assuming you want (say) the x-axis to have equal increments, set up the grid,
enable snap-to-grid, and paint constraining the line with shift for
On 19.10.2010 11:48, Ofnuts wrote:
On 10/19/2010 11:32 AM, yahvuu wrote:
On 11.10.2010 18:29, Chris Mohler wrote:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Patrick Horganphorg...@yahoo.com
wrote:
i'm curious how other people regard layer masks. In particular, which
memory aids exist
On 11.10.2010 18:29, Chris Mohler wrote:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Patrick Horganphorg...@yahoo.com wrote:
i'm curious how other people regard layer masks. In particular, which
memory aids exist to remember when to use black and when to use white.
I think of it like illumination.
Hi,
i'm curious how other people regard layer masks. In particular, which
memory aids exist to remember when to use black and when to use white.
Two contradicting examples which both seem to survive inside my head:
- the (correct) math perspective: black equals zero, zero opacity means
On 07.10.2010 04:50, 黄毅 wrote:
For example, I have text like this:
Screenshot.png
Text to path would give me this:
Screenshot-1.png
But what i want is this:
Screenshot-2.png
How can i do that automaticaly, google don't help me with that.
Thanks.
this might or might not help:
On 02.10.2010 02:50, bobdobbs wrote:
How can I figure out what the result of deletion operations on pixels will
be?
for the record, i just learned that a bold layer name indicates a missing
alpha channel (as displayed in the layers dialog):
On 30.09.2010 05:39, bobdobbs wrote:
Hi all.
I'd like to delete in such a way that transparency remains.
I've found that this is the default when I'm working on images that I've
created myself.
But if I'm working on an image that I've downloaded or gotten from another
source, I can't
On 01.09.2010 19:22, Jay Smith wrote:
So, why do I have to save the image to a file...
[..]
- before the size is stated more reasonably
Hi Jay,
you'll be pleased to hear that the next release of GIMP will enable you
to display the Megapixel count by configuring the status bar messsage.
The
On 01.09.2010 19:22, Jay Smith wrote:
So, I created a new image by doing the following.
Select All in original image.
Copy
File, Create, From Clipboard
Creates a new image that looks like the previous.
I change the size (scale) to something more suitable for printing.
AT THIS POINT I
to resort to the layers dialog.
Somewhat paradoxically, this would be my favourite tool for color adjustments.
regards,
yahvuu
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
On 22.06.2010 18:42, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On 6/22/10, yahvuu wrote:
Actually, i was thinking of a pure object selection tool without any
manipulation functionality. Just to choose the current paint context
without obscuring it, and without having to resort to the layers dialog
On 22.06.2010 20:28, Sven Neumann wrote:
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 17:55 +0200, yahvuu wrote:
On 22.06.2010 00:30, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
Well, it looks like slightly improved existing Move tool to me :)
Actually, i was thinking of a pure object selection tool without any
manipulation
not too fond of mice, anyway).
I actually trained myself to activate the rectangle selection tool
while doing color adjustments -- after struggling with a serious of
images which contained miraculously slightly off-moved layers...
regards,
yahvuu
, tools can be switched quite fast..
thanks anyway,
yahvuu
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
On 22.06.2010 21:47, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On 6/22/10, yahvuu wrote:
And why does the Move tool not work for you then? It allows you to
select a layer simply by clicking into the image. Perhaps you missed the
Set layer or path as active option in the Preferences dialog
On 22.06.2010 21:50, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On 6/22/10, yahvuu wrote:
thanks, but i refuse to select layers by their thumbnails in the layers
dialog, when i can just click them right there in image! .-)
That is, you refuse to work on images with layers completely
overlapping other
-- hence objects [2].
This is not my fault, but GEGL's. Should also produce a little relief for those
poor little abused layers ;-)
Nobody is allowed to die until GIMP is finished!
- yahvuu
[1] http://gimp-brainstorm.blogspot.com/2009/06/object-picker.html
[2] http://gimp-brainstorm.blogspot.com
Jay Smith wrote:
It just occurred to me that it would be really handy to be able to
enlarge the _canvas_ by dragging.
Hi Jay,
that's a cool idea! Be shure to post it to the brainstorm so it
doesn't get lost -- the UI team is listening there [1].
- Layers: The Resize Layers (when changing
Jay Smith wrote:
On 03/10/2010 03:27 PM, yahvuu wrote:
Martin Nordholts wrote:
2010/3/10 yahvuu yah...@gmail.com:
Each of these dialog options points at a potential interaction problem. If
the
dialog remembers an option, the user also has to remember that option.
In general, this amounts
Hi,
Jay Smith wrote:
Image Canvas Size
in the Set Image Canvas Size dialog
in the Layers section at the bottom
there are five different possible settings, including None, All Layers,
etc. etc.
In Gimp 2.6.6 (Ubuntu Linux 8.04) this defaults to None and ALWAYS
remains none EVERY time I go
Martin Nordholts wrote:
2010/3/10 yahvuu yah...@gmail.com:
Each of these dialog options points at a potential interaction problem. If
the
dialog remembers an option, the user also has to remember that option.
In general, this amounts to additional cognitive burden to keep the mental
model
Hi Tőkés,
Tőkés Ábel wrote:
Solved.
[..]
Sorry for bothering.
Not at all: thank you for posting the solution! Somebody with a similar
problem will find it in the archives.
regards,
peter
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
hi,
Gracia M. Littauer wrote:
any way to easiely make a collage...I know I can add pix to a new image. But
I
would love something that picasa photoshop seem to have.
then why not use picasa? At least it is free as in 'free beer'.
regards,
peter
Rich Evans wrote:
That's it! Perfect.
glad to hear it works as expected. Just want to add that the programmer's route,
aka doing it by the math, is quite viable, too. Some selected options:
- the MathMap plugin probably enables the most concise solution:
hi,
Rich Evans wrote:
[..] Is there a
technique or tool to invert any part of the image that is only a shade of
grey?
i.e. invert pixeils with a saturation of ~0 (if that is how you say
it).
The on-board tools are just fine for this.
Do something to some pixels (here: invert) and leave
hi,
Cristian Secară wrote:
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 12:44:33 +0100, Simon Budig wrote:
Ok, I go to http://gimp.org. Where are the tubes ?
In the past. The tube on our homepage is long history... :-)
If so, then it would be better to remove the particular reference to
gimp.org from that
Hi Cédric,
Cédric Gémy wrote:
i find this rainbow UI really nice because it lets you quite easily (gimp
curve-like) modify any hue of the document.
looks fine, thank you.
Be sure to compile a posting for the UI brainstorm,
so the idea doesn't get lost:
http://gimp-brainstorm.blogspot.com/
hi,
Bryan wrote:
Peter, thanks for reponding. I have the same version as you do. What I did
was save a sample file from the site I was on to use in my learning. All I did
was save it in the same directory as my own image but maybe I need to store
that sample image in a specific location in
Bryan wrote:
[..]
If I open up the
drop down selector above the sample image, the only choices I have are My own
image file name, or From Gradient, or From Reverse Gradient.
ahh, possibly your sample image is a GIF?
Please check the Image-Mode menu and make shure it is set to RGB.
That's an
photocomix wrote:
Nobody know ?
Gimp wiki is still offline but i remember well that somebody advice that
was
always possible get the same page from a mirror somewhere
The problem is that i can't find the mirror, searching didn't helped me.
(and usual tricks, as search in the internet
Frank Gore wrote:
But a much better and simpler idea is to just use a
number range from 1..13, similar to photoshop.
I'll take that over to the developer's list.
I disagree, I think Photoshop's way of displaying the JPG compression
slider is ridiculous. You can move the slider back and
hi BGP,
BGP wrote:
How do I create a clickable hotspot in GIMP?
Filters-Web-Image Map will do the job.
Documentation is here:
http://docs.gimp.org/2.6/en/plug-in-imagemap.html
have fun,
peter
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Norman Silverstone wrote:
Here is a table that provides an approximate mapping between Photoshop
quality levels and GIMP (actually IJG JPEG library) quality levels:
Adobe Photoshop quality 12 = GIMP quality 98, subsampling 1x1
[..]
wow, i grossly underestimated the influence of the
Philip Rhoades wrote:
It still seems counter intuitive that opening a JPG (even if it is a
photo rather than a computer generated image) and immediately saving it
with 100% quality increases the size by 2.5 . .
so you mean the scale should be different? Like
1 .. 10 ... 100 ... 10
Philip Rhoades wrote:
Peter,
On 2010-01-18 20:40, yahvuu wrote:
Philip Rhoades wrote:
It still seems counter intuitive that opening a JPG (even if it is a
photo rather than a computer generated image) and immediately saving it
with 100% quality increases the size by 2.5 . .
so you mean
Hi Philip,
Philip Rhoades wrote:
- When saving as JPG with 85% quality am I losing information?
JPG utilizes lossy compression, which means you'll loose information
every time you save as JPG, even at 100% quality setting.
That value does not specify the percentage of information stored
in
Philip Rhoades wrote:
What still doesn't make sense is that if the original file is JPG and
one simply opens it and then saves it as another JPG file with 100%
quality - you are saying that introduced artifacts are adding about 150%
to the file size? (681 KB to 1.618 MB) How could the
hi,
Yang Zhang wrote:
Is there anything in GIMP that's equivalent to Photoshop's luminosity
blend mode?
what comes closest is 'value' mode.
regards,
yahvuu
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Joel Glanfield schrieb:
Just curious about how to change sky-colors like you see in a lot of
professional photographs.
Hi Joel, just shoot your photos around sunrise/sunset (at the right day).
Ken Rockwell explains:
Most people never see colors like this because they live indoors,
work in an
39 matches
Mail list logo
