On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Ofnuts wrote:
> On 09/05/2011 08:54 AM, Frank Gore wrote:
>> Call me a pervert, but now my curiosity is piqued... I wish I could see it :D
>
> http://git.gnome.org/browse/gimp/plain/data/images/gimp-splash.png
BAHAHA! That's AWESO
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Julien Hardelin wrote:
>
> GIMP-2.7.3 splashscreen? I agree with you. Shocking!
Call me a pervert, but now my curiosity is piqued... I wish I could see it :D
--
Frank Gore
www.ProjectPontiac.com
___
Gimp-user m
dly and
helpful mailing list with your blind and narrow-minded demands.
--
Frank Gore
www.ProjectPontiac.com
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
to show up in search results and display ads to
people. There's nothing illegal about that.
--
Frank Gore
www.ProjectPontiac.com
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
#x27;t found yet that will
> rotate, move and crop all in one step? I just want to turn the entire image
> on it's side without any other fuss. Is that possible somehow? I have to
> assume it is, but I sure couldn't find it... thanks!
Image -> Transfor
software that can do that already given the black images. Anyone?
Black frame noise reduction only applies to long exposures for
removing hot pixels. It does nothing beneficial to reduce high-ISO
noise.
--
Frank Gore
www.ProjectPontiac.com
_
of noise reduction, but the options are so vast and complex,
it's tough to know where to start. There are a couple of tutorials
online that show you how to use GMIC specifically for noise reduction.
Unfortunately I've misplaced those links.
--
Frank Gore
www
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Mikael Ståldal wrote:
> I recently brought the book GIMP 2.6 Cookbook.
So here I was, looking forward to a Gimp book review, and all I get is
this tripe about B&W illustrations... (as if that even matters).
worst... book review... ever!
--
Fra
options are so numerous and arcane, I can't make heads of tails of
them. I've wasted tons of time adjusting options blindly until I was
happy with the results... but then I couldn't figure out WHY the
settings worked, so I couldn't really reproduce them reliably. Maybe
you'd h
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:00 AM, Jeremy Nell wrote:
> a bunch of things
Way to not answer any questions, send replies to the list that were
never meant to be seen here, hype up your skills on some other
software, and declare bugs to the world without justification! Very
awesome stuff.
--
Fr
election? Currently, I have to make the selection float before being
> able to transform it. Why is that?
Because the Layer menu gives you options that target a layer, not a
selection on the layer. When you make your selection float, you'e
essentially creating a new, tem
-11
2.7 is the development version of 2.8. That's the way Gimp has always
been developed. The odd number is the development version that will
become the final (even) number. 2.5 dev was released as 2.6 stable,
2.7 dev will become 2.8 stable, etc.
--
Frank Gore
www.Pr
ne, keep your replies regarding this private. The whole
list has no interest in reading them.
--
Frank Gore
www.ProjectPontiac.com
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
merged layer be: above or below the middle one?
Honestly, it should just be part of the default feature set in Gimp.
I'm a bit shocked that it still isn't.
--
Frank Gore
www.ProjectPontiac.com
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lis
ot;Merge Visible Layers". Same result,
but a few extra clicks.
--
Frank Gore
www.ProjectPontiac.com
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
he needs Viagra
to perform his duties as a husband. In protest of the perceived
insult, I will never use Microsoft products again.
--
Frank Gore
www.ProjectPontiac.com
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Ber
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Ofnuts wrote:
> This is definitely not true... Try this:
How ironic that an off-topic original question would go so wildly off-topic...
--
Frank Gore
THE place to talk photography!
www.friendlyphotozone.com
___
G
when saving a JPG file. I typically
disable this option for web graphics to make the file size smaller.
--
Frank Gore
THE place to talk photography!
www.friendlyphotozone.com
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
he next development cycle, and I look
forward to seeing this new functionality in action.
--
Frank Gore
THE place to talk photography!
www.friendlyphotozone.com
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
f "less" and "lame" feel about their choice of name.
--
Frank Gore
Project Manager
www.projectpontiac.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Gimp-user mailing list
> Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
> https://li
ure that's beyond the control of the developers.
--
Frank Gore
Project Manager
www.projectpontiac.com
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
gives me great control and is very easy to do, but
> unfortunately it requires a lot of time-consuming steps.
But... isn't there red-eye reduction right there in Gimp 2.6?
Filters -> Enahnce -> Red Eye Removal
--
Frank Gore
Project M
ediately.
This is worth the extra cost for me, and I actually find it cheaper
than working with the professional photo labs.
--
Frank Gore
Project Manager
www.projectpontiac.com
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
olour fidelity, so I'll have to check
out the options. It's just hard to beat HP's Linux support. Even the
printers they don't officially support (of which there are few) tend
to work flawlessly anyways. I've been burned in this department before
with cheap Lexmark printers.
to printer is only $140 or so and would give me
better print quality than commercial photo printing companies.
--
Frank Gore
Project Manager
www.projectpontiac.com
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley
nction. I
can't even select custom sizes on the printer itself, disregarding
HPLIP altogether. I've been contemplating buying a picture printer
specifically for making prints of my pictures without having to drive
to the store all the time.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 2:47 PM, peter kostov wrote:
> And have in mind that this will not be the same person in any way!
> Nobody is perfectly symmetrical (try this with your own photo) :( Even
> the most beautiful of us ;)
I don't know about that... I'm extremely beautif
an interactive
selection transform tool that I can use modifier keys with.
--
Frank Gore
Project Manager
www.projectpontiac.com
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Claus Cyrny wrote:
> In the very beginning, I used this document as a reference:
>
> http://www.lib.tsinghua.edu.cn/chinese/INTERNET/HTML/Table/html_design.html
Oh wow, that brings back memories... you just made me feel real old.
--
Frank Gore
Projec
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> You fail to mention the versions of the binaries you are using to make
> your statement or who generated those binaries and whether the exif data
> function was even compiled into your binaries.
I currently have Gimp 2.6.8. I've had the s
All that awesome EXIF info in my RAW pictures that I'd like to keep.
Does UFraw not pass it along, or does Gimp not collect it? It's REALLY
ANNOYING!!!
How do others deal with this? I'd love to hear solutions!
--
Frank Gore
Project Manager
www.pro
esults even better than
Smart Sharpne in Photoshop CS2. I don't think it's included as part of
the default Gimp package, I need to add it separately in openSUSE
11.2.
--
Frank Gore
Project Manager
www.projectpontiac.com
___
Gimp-user m
e correlation was. And I
always worried that Adobe was ignoring the subsampling aspect, now I
know better. It's also interesting to see that they don't allow
anything lower than 8...@2x2.
--
Frank Gore
Project Manager
www.projectpontiac.com
_
HAH! All of this has been a long-standing bug:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=492048
--
Frank Gore
Project Manager
www.projectpontiac.com
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman
> WhitePoint Y: 0.33
> Chromaticity Red(X):0.64
> Chromaticity Red(Y):0.33
> Chromaticity Green(X): 0.21
> Chromaticity Green(Y): 0.71
> Chromaticity Blue(X): 0.15
> Chromaticity Blue(Y): 0.06
> YCbCrCoefficient 1: 0.30
> YCbCrCoefficient 2: 0.59
nd 4.x. Does Gimp support both? Does it
support the latest? (4.2)
--
Frank Gore
Project Manager
www.projectpontiac.com
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 3:26 AM, David Gowers <00a...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Don't you think that would be very tiresome?
> Most images have no ICC profile attached; in this case, sRGB is indeed
> implied. Producing images that are not sRGB but have no ICC profile
> attached is wrong (more precisely,
when I open the file. Isn't that how
it's supposed to work? That's what other applications do, for example
Digikam/showFoto.
--
Frank Gore
Project Manager
www.projectpontiac.com
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Frank Gore wrote:
> As I mentioned, all the commercial applications I've tried had no
> problems determining the appropriate color space for these files. It's
> only open source tools that are unable to, including Gimp.
>
> So is this a
le
formats? They can't be that crazy if commercial applications have no
trouble with the files.
--
Frank Gore
Project Manager
www.projectpontiac.com
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailma
cial application I've
used has had no problems with it so far. It's only Gimp and Digikam
that are giving me trouble.
--
Frank Gore
Project Manager
www.projectpontiac.com
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
supposed to leave it as sRGB? That tends to mess up the colors the
other way, adding contrast and saturation where there should be less.
In any case, like I mentioned in my original post, I specifically have
it set to "Ask what to do" in the P
o sRGB
whenever possible, but it's not always ideal.
I hope someone can help me with this issue.
I have Gimp 2.6.8 on openSUSE 11.2 x86_64. It's a backport from the
Gnome OBS repository.
--
Frank Gore
Project Manager
www.projectpontiac.com
__
43 matches
Mail list logo
