Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Multiple file scaling

2005-06-25 Thread Manish Singh
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 05:29:56PM +0200, Andreas Waechter wrote: > Carol Spears wrote: > >On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 03:59:37PM +0200, Andreas Waechter wrote: > > > >>Carol (cite: "please continue to steal"). > >> > > > >it is very out of context now. can you point to where i can download > >any Win

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Multiple file scaling

2005-06-25 Thread Andreas Waechter
Carol Spears wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 03:59:37PM +0200, Andreas Waechter wrote: Carol (cite: "please continue to steal"). it is very out of context now. can you point to where i can download any Windows operating system for free? Ok, if you need your own sentence explained to you: H

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Multiple file scaling

2005-06-25 Thread Carol Spears
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 03:59:37PM +0200, Andreas Waechter wrote: > > Carol (cite: "please continue to steal"). > it is very out of context now. can you point to where i can download any Windows operating system for free? stripping the context from the email is cool, i should learn how to do th

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Multiple file scaling

2005-06-25 Thread Andreas Waechter
Patrick Shanahan wrote: Hm. Tell me please where I have been discourteous to people. sending list mail to private address and duplicates When? Are you talking about any of the messages with the current subject? I just double-checked my "Sent" folder. All four messages on this subject that

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Multiple file scaling

2005-06-25 Thread nuno alexandre
On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 13:58 +0200, Andreas Waechter wrote: > That I tried to explain to nuno alexandre why he might have > received an answer to his mail address instead of the list > mail address? Yes, and I just asked the other person to pay some attention when replying to the list, to not sen

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Multiple file scaling

2005-06-25 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Andreas Waechter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06-25-05 07:02]: ... > you might have seen that the blame that "reply" is not going > to the list *is* put on my Thunderbird. No, you have the ability w/thunderbird to edit headers and to specify "To:" and cc and bcc addresses. *You* are responsible for w

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Multiple file scaling

2005-06-25 Thread Andreas Waechter
Patrick Shanahan wrote: * Andreas Waechter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06-25-05 00:58]: No, Thunderbird should not "reply" to the list with the current settings of the list. Your *mail* client is *not* being blamed. if you had read the lines on which I answered, namely >> Not sure what is goin

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Multiple file scaling

2005-06-25 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Andreas Waechter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06-25-05 00:58]: > No, Thunderbird should not "reply" to the list with the > current settings of the list. > > There is no "Reply-To" header, thus a "Reply" has to go to > the address in the "From" header - which is the address of > the original sender, n

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Multiple file scaling

2005-06-25 Thread Carol Spears
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 09:15:51AM +0200, nuno alexandre wrote: > On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 23:35 -0700, Carol Spears wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 07:56:27AM +0200, Andreas Waechter wrote: > > > > > > 15 out of 17 mail lists I read have a reply-to header with > > > the list address, the only ot

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Multiple file scaling

2005-06-25 Thread Carol Spears
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 10:00:17AM +0200, Andreas Waechter wrote: > >please continue to steal > [...] > >leave it alone in the name of netiquette! > > Ah, I understand: > > Netiquette means that you are allowed to imply that someone > is a thief but that you are not allowed to talk about mail

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Multiple file scaling

2005-06-25 Thread nuno alexandre
On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 01:32 -0700, Manish Singh wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 09:15:51AM +0200, nuno alexandre wrote: > > heh :) > > All sourceforge, LKML and so many other lists act this same way. > > (reply goes to the list ) > > That's not true. LKML does not set Reply-To to the list. Neit

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Multiple file scaling

2005-06-25 Thread Manish Singh
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 09:15:51AM +0200, nuno alexandre wrote: > On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 23:35 -0700, Carol Spears wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 07:56:27AM +0200, Andreas Waechter wrote: > > > > > > 15 out of 17 mail lists I read have a reply-to header with > > > the list address, the only ot

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Multiple file scaling

2005-06-25 Thread Michael Schumacher
Andreas Waechter wrote: >> Andreas, >> Not sure what is going on in your Thunderbird, maybe a setting or >> something, but "reply" should send it right back to the mail list. > > > No, Thunderbird should not "reply" to the list with the current settings > of the list. > > There is no "Reply-To

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Multiple file scaling

2005-06-25 Thread Andreas Waechter
please continue to steal [...] leave it alone in the name of netiquette! Ah, I understand: Netiquette means that you are allowed to imply that someone is a thief but that you are not allowed to talk about mail list behaviour. Thanks for making that clear to me.

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Multiple file scaling

2005-06-25 Thread nuno alexandre
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 23:35 -0700, Carol Spears wrote: > On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 07:56:27AM +0200, Andreas Waechter wrote: > > > > 15 out of 17 mail lists I read have a reply-to header with > > the list address, the only other list which has one is one I > > only read and never reply - with thos

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Multiple file scaling

2005-06-24 Thread Carol Spears
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 07:56:27AM +0200, Andreas Waechter wrote: > > 15 out of 17 mail lists I read have a reply-to header with > the list address, the only other list which has one is one I > only read and never reply - with those 15 mail lists, a > "Reply" goes to the list. > 15 out of 17 o

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Multiple file scaling

2005-06-24 Thread Andreas Waechter
Andreas, Not sure what is going on in your Thunderbird, maybe a setting or something, but "reply" should send it right back to the mail list. No, Thunderbird should not "reply" to the list with the current settings of the list. There is no "Reply-To" header, thus a "Reply" has to go to th

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Multiple file scaling

2005-06-24 Thread BandiPat
On Friday 24 June 2005 10:45 am, Andreas Waechter wrote: > nuno alexandre wrote: > > Oh and BTW, > > Can you _please_ reply only to the list and not to me personally, > > unless requested ? > > Unfortunately (IMO) this list is set up so that a "Reply" > goes NOT to the list but to the original send

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Multiple file scaling

2005-06-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Andreas Waechter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Unfortunately (IMO) this list is set up so that a "Reply" goes NOT to > the list but to the original sender of the message. > I don't know why this list is set up in this way - replying to the > list (for public discussion) is IMO the standard ca

Reply to Considered Harmful [was Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Multiple file scaling]

2005-06-24 Thread Alan Horkan
Please do not reply to this message. Please let this discussion end as quickly as possible. On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Andreas Waechter wrote: > Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:45:50 +0200 > From: Andreas Waechter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu > Subject:

Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Multiple file scaling

2005-06-24 Thread Andreas Waechter
nuno alexandre wrote: Oh and BTW, Can you _please_ reply only to the list and not to me personally, unless requested ? Unfortunately (IMO) this list is set up so that a "Reply" goes NOT to the list but to the original sender of the message. I don't know why this list is set up in this way - re

[Gimp-user] Re: Multiple file scaling

2005-06-24 Thread nuno alexandre
Oh and BTW, Can you _please_ reply only to the list and not to me personally, unless requested ? Thank you. nuno -- "Non-free programs are dangerous to you and to your community. Don't let them get a place in your life." - RMS ___