On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 5:54 PM Lloyd Kvam wrote:
> I hope I did not burden you with excessive emails.
This is the most interesting thread we've had on this list for months. ;-)
-- Ben
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
t burden you with excessive emails. Thanks for the moral
> support.
>
> On Mon, 2020-06-01 at 13:51 -0400, Tom Buskey wrote:
> > On my Fedora 31, I only have 2 xen rpms:
> > xen-licenses-4.12.2-3.fc31.x86_64
> > xen-libs-4.12.2-3.fc31.x86_64
> >
> >
hope I did not burden you with excessive emails. Thanks for the moral support.
On Mon, 2020-06-01 at 13:51 -0400, Tom Buskey wrote:
> On my Fedora 31, I only have 2 xen rpms:
> xen-licenses-4.12.2-3.fc31.x86_64
> xen-libs-4.12.2-3.fc31.x86_64
>
> If you don't need xen specifically
On Mon, 2020-06-01 at 13:51 -0400, Tom Buskey wrote:
> On my Fedora 31, I only have 2 xen rpms:
> xen-licenses-4.12.2-3.fc31.x86_64
> xen-libs-4.12.2-3.fc31.x86_64
I have started trying to migrate. Unfortunately, virt-v2v requires a working
libvirtd to move
things along. qemu-img
On my Fedora 31, I only have 2 xen rpms:
xen-licenses-4.12.2-3.fc31.x86_64
xen-libs-4.12.2-3.fc31.x86_64
If you don't need xen specifically, you shouldn't use a xen kernel.
Everything is using KVM nowadays
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 9:17 AM Lloyd Kvam wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-05-31 at 20:10 -0
un, 2020-05-31 at 18:17 -0400, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> > > > I have not used libvirtd on fedora 32 directky but I do use gnome boxes
> > > > that does use libvirtd.
> > > > Did you try removing and reloading the packages.
> > >
> > > Yes,
th the
> > regular kernel.
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 2020-05-31 at 19:38 -0400, Lloyd Kvam wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2020-05-31 at 18:17 -0400, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> > > > I have not used libvirtd on fedora 32 directky but I do use gnome
> boxes
> > > &
On Sun, 2020-05-31 at 19:38 -0400, Lloyd Kvam wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-05-31 at 18:17 -0400, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> > > I have not used libvirtd on fedora 32 directky but I do use gnome boxes
> > > that does use libvirtd.
> > > Did you try removing and reloading the p
oot the XEN kernel.
> It's OK with the
> regular kernel.
>
>
> On Sun, 2020-05-31 at 19:38 -0400, Lloyd Kvam wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-05-31 at 18:17 -0400, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> > > I have not used libvirtd on fedora 32 directky but I do use gnome boxes
> > >
The key piece that I left out: libvirtd fails when I boot the XEN kernel. It's
OK with the
regular kernel.
On Sun, 2020-05-31 at 19:38 -0400, Lloyd Kvam wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-05-31 at 18:17 -0400, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> > I have not used libvirtd on fedora 32 directky but I do use gn
On Sun, 2020-05-31 at 18:17 -0400, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> I have not used libvirtd on fedora 32 directky but I do use gnome boxes
> that does use libvirtd.
> Did you try removing and reloading the packages.
Yes, dnf reinstall on the libvirt and xen packages.
After disabling
I have not used libvirtd on fedora 32 directky but I do use gnome boxes
that does use libvirtd.
Did you try removing and reloading the packages.
--
Jerry Feldman
Boston Linux and Unix http://www.blu.org
PGP key id: 6F6BB6E7
PGP Key fingerprint: 0EDC 2FF5 53A6 8EED 84D1 3050 5715 B88D 6F6
B B6E7
This on my home server which runs a virtualized Ubuntu. The output below is
from journalctl and
shows how libvirtd just recycles without end. I would greatly appreciate any
pointers for
figuring out what's wrong with libvirtd.
I suppose an alternative would be to turn the Ubuntu image into
Hi,
As numerous places of work are, I am in a mostly windows shop. I'm
having problems with fedora network manager not setting the hostname
through dhclient to the windows dns and dhcp server. There are 2
people here that are using Ubuntu without any problems. I tried the
same setup
Debian (Ubuntu) and Red Hat (Fedora) put their config files in
different places. On Fedora, it looks like the file should
be /etc/dhcp/dhclient.conf
You can look at: /usr/share/doc/dhclient-4.2.1/dhclient.conf.sample for other
examples that may help.
Michael
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:42:54
of work are, I am in a mostly windows shop. I'm
having problems with fedora network manager not setting the hostname
through dhclient to the windows dns and dhcp server. There are 2
people here that are using Ubuntu without any problems. I tried the
same setup but it fails. I created
the trick for
me.
-Ken
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:42:54 -0400 Pete Snider pds...@gmail.com wrote
Hi,
As numerous places of work are, I am in a mostly windows shop. I'm
having problems with fedora network manager not setting the hostname
through dhclient to the windows dns and dhcp server
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:50:27 -0400
Bill Sconce sco...@in-spec-inc.com wrote:
a whole stream of replies -- and most significantly,
an answer to the last question. (I.e., don't give up.)
I'm glad I (we) didn't. Victory!
Thanks to everyone who responded. I'll do some more reading
and
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Bill Sconce sco...@in-spec-inc.com wrote:
We look like
heros. Heck, we ARE heros...
Mal: Well, look at this! Appears we got here just in the nick of time.
What does that make us?
Zoe: Big damn heroes, sir!
Mal: Ain't we just?
Good job, Bill!
P.S. There
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Benjamin Scott dragonh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Dan Jenkins d...@rastech.com wrote:
We don't have to wear spandex, do we??
I, for one, definitely do not look good in spandex.
But a cape might be cool.
No capes! Thunderhead,
On 6/11/2010 4:34 PM, Joshua Judson Rosen wrote:
It's *us*. *We're* the Software Freedom Squad.
Since when?
Since *now*.
We don't have to wear spandex, do we??
I, for one, definitely do not look good in spandex.
But a cape might be cool.
My business partner, Keith, actually would look
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Dan Jenkins d...@rastech.com wrote:
We don't have to wear spandex, do we??
I, for one, definitely do not look good in spandex.
But a cape might be cool.
No capes! Thunderhead, Stratogale, the list goes on...
-- Ben
David Rysdam da...@rysdam.org writes:
On 06/10/2010 05:32 PM, Joshua Judson Rosen wrote:
Dan Jenkins d...@rastech.com writes:
I haven't had as much luck with Fedora and Centos, though I didn't
really try to; just gave the folk network cards which did work and put
the Broadcoms
apps, the combination of which proved to be a
nightmare and impossible to get or keep working. Eventually
someone suggested to the library that the Linux community
might be able to help; somehow my name came up, and I received
the HELP SAVE US message.
After an initial visit, I burned a Fedora 13
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Bill Sconce sco...@in-spec-inc.com wrote:
After an initial visit, I burned a Fedora 13 live CD for them
to try, took it over to the library, booted it and showed it off.
All OK.
But then the zinger: of COURSE...they only use wireless. And
of COURSE
Bill Sconce wrote:
But then the zinger: of COURSE...they only use wireless. And
of COURSE...the laptop has a Broadcom Wifi adapter. And of course
it doesn't work.
My netbook reports having a Network controller: Broadcom Corporation
BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01). It's currently running Ubuntu
On 06/10/2010 02:30 PM, Alan Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Bill Sconce sco...@in-spec-inc.com
mailto:sco...@in-spec-inc.com wrote:
After an initial visit, I burned a Fedora 13 live CD for them
to try, took it over to the library, booted it and showed it off.
All
On 06/10/2010 02:33 PM, Cole Tuininga wrote:
Bill Sconce wrote:
But then the zinger: of COURSE...they only use wireless. And
of COURSE...the laptop has a Broadcom Wifi adapter. And of course
it doesn't work.
My netbook reports having a Network controller: Broadcom Corporation
Google results seem to suggest for Fedora that you have 2 options:
* Get the proprietary Broadcom firmware and use the fw-cutter tool to
extract the firmware and drop it in /lib/firmware
http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/b43#device_firmware_installation
* Use the open rewrite/replacement
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:11:01 -0400
Bill Sconce sco...@in-spec-inc.com wrote:
Does anyone have experience, either with this laptop (Dell
Dimension E5500) or with getting a $#! Broadcom adapter to work
(a 4318 apparently)
Wow. Before I could finish typing this after interruption I see
On 06/10/2010 02:35 PM, kenta wrote:
Why not use fwcutter? I used it recently with Ubuntu 10 .04 on an
aging Dell laptop (I don't remember the model, but it was about an 2
inch thick brick of a laptop). It too had a Broadcomm chip based
wireless adapter and after an apt-get and hitting OK
stumbled across this page which seems to have a lot of suggestions,
Fedora-specific:
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/archive/index.php/t-239922.html
As an alternative, you might suggest they buy a wireless card which is
supportable, but then you'll be responsible for identifying the correct
card
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:11:01 -0400
Bill Sconce sco...@in-spec-inc.com wrote:
Does anyone have experience, either with this laptop (Dell
Dimension E5500) or with getting a $#! Broadcom adapter to work
(a 4318 apparently) -- or experience which justifies a decision
to just not do this?
Look at
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:50:27 -0400
Bill Sconce sco...@in-spec-inc.com wrote:
The library shall have its laptops
FREE OF MICROSOFT after all!
More later...
Of course you could go crazy and turn them into thin clients. You have
seen how well that works as I recall in an educational
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Shawn O'Shea sh...@eth0.net wrote:
Google results seem to suggest for Fedora that you have 2 options:
* Get the proprietary Broadcom firmware and use the fw-cutter tool to
extract the firmware and drop it in /lib/firmware
http://linuxwireless.org/en/users
had almost no trouble getting Broadcom to work with Ubuntu and
Mandriva distros. Just get the most current versions.
I haven't had as much luck with Fedora and Centos, though I didn't
really try to; just gave the folk network cards which did work and put
the Broadcoms in Windows laptops. (I had
justifies a decision to just not
do this?
I've had almost no trouble getting Broadcom to work with Ubuntu and
Mandriva distros. Just get the most current versions.
I haven't had as much luck with Fedora and Centos, though I didn't
really try to; just gave the folk network cards which
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Ed lawson elaw...@grizzy.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:50:27 -0400
Bill Sconce sco...@in-spec-inc.com wrote:
The library shall have its laptops
FREE OF MICROSOFT after all!
More later...
Of course you could go crazy and turn them into thin clients.
On 06/10/2010 05:32 PM, Joshua Judson Rosen wrote:
Dan Jenkins d...@rastech.com writes:
I haven't had as much luck with Fedora and Centos, though I didn't
really try to; just gave the folk network cards which did work and put
the Broadcoms in Windows laptops. (I had a surplus of laptops
Alex Hewitt wrote:
Jarod Wilson wrote:
Alex Hewitt wrote:
Just an update - the system that I was trying to install various 64 bit
Linux distros also wouldn't install Vista 64. Turns out the processor I
was using has some kind of TLB bug (AMD Phenom X4 9600).
Oh,
Ben Scott wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Alex Hewitt hewitt_t...@comcast.net wrote:
Linux hostname.localdomain 2.6.27.5.117.fc10.i686.PAE #1 SMP Tue Nov 18
12:08:10 EST 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
The i386 indicates the running kernel is for the i386
architecture.
I have a copy of Fedora 10 that came inside a Linux Format magazine. I
installed it on a new system with 8 gb of RAM and a quad core AMD CPU.
When I issue the free command I see all 8 gb of RAM. Does that mean that
the distro installed itself as a 64 bit version? If so, is there an easy
way
Alex Hewitt wrote:
I have a copy of Fedora 10 that came inside a Linux Format magazine. I
installed it on a new system with 8 gb of RAM and a quad core AMD CPU.
When I issue the free command I see all 8 gb of RAM. Does that mean that
the distro installed itself as a 64 bit version? If so
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Alex Hewitt hewitt_t...@comcast.net wrote:
Linux hostname.localdomain 2.6.27.5.117.fc10.i686.PAE #1 SMP Tue Nov 18
12:08:10 EST 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
The i386 indicates the running kernel is for the i386
architecture. In other words, 32-bit. A
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 17:55 -0500, Alex Hewitt wrote:
This book would be useful for someone who wants to cover Fedora's
features
I've also posted this review to the LUG library page.
(I assumed you would approve, Alex)
http://www.librarything.com/work/5294882/book/30093988
I'm happy to post
This book, one of a series of Unleashed books published by SAMS is a
topical work designed to instruct intermediate to advanced users of
RedHat's Fedora distribution of Linux. This edition covers Fedora
version 8 and includes a DVD with the software. It also states that if
the book
Good morning, all,
If you're not able to get ISOs via bittorrent, I have the i686 and
x86_64 DVD and Live ISOs at http://lunkwill.dartmouth.edu/linux/ . The
Fedora-10-i386-DVD is still downloading, and should be finished by around
1:30pm.
Cheers,
- Bill
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 11:32 -0500, William Stearns wrote:
Good morning, all,
If you're not able to get ISOs via bittorrent, I have the i686 and
x86_64 DVD and Live ISOs at http://lunkwill.dartmouth.edu/linux/ . The
Fedora-10-i386-DVD is still downloading, and should be finished
Now that we've heard from Jarrod, it gives me the opportunity to ask a
question or two about Fedora.
You may remember my woes of dealing with SciLinux and essentially
concluding it wasn't modern enough for what I wanted to do. (64 bit /
3D imaging / rotation / scientific) I am not too happy
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Bruce Labitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a Fedora 10? or is that in alpha?
The current general release is Fedora 9.
From my point of view, the Fedora project is *always* in
development/testing mode for the next release. The stated goal of the
Fedora
Fedora is very much a bleeding edge distribution. It usually has the most
late-breaking versions of packages. It is not unheard of to find
pre-release or beta versions, sometimes against the original upstream
source's wishes. It also tends to be a showcase of ideas
never-been-packaged
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:54:27PM -0400, Ben Scott wrote:
Can one relatively painlessly upgrade from Fedora 9 to 10?
The official upgrade path for Fedora is to download disc images for
the latest release, burn and boot from disc, and follow the prompts to
upgrade.
I've read several
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Bruce Labitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a Fedora 10? or is that in alpha? I just am a bit leary of the
upgrade cycle for Fedora. Can one relatively painlessly upgrade from
Fedora 9 to 10?
I've personally stayed away from Fedora for one real reason
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 13:48 -0400, Thomas Charron wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Bruce Labitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a Fedora 10? or is that in alpha? I just am a bit leary of the
upgrade cycle for Fedora. Can one relatively painlessly upgrade from
Fedora 9 to 10
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 12:54 -0400, Ben Scott wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Bruce Labitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a Fedora 10? or is that in alpha?
The current general release is Fedora 9.
From my point of view, the Fedora project is *always* in
development/testing
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 13:03 -0400, Darrell Michaud wrote:
Fedora is very much a bleeding edge distribution. It usually has the most
late-breaking versions of packages.
The development tree definitely does. Stable releases, it varies a bit
from package to package. One of the interesting things
Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 13:03 -0400, Darrell Michaud wrote:
Fedora is very much a bleeding edge distribution. It usually has the most
late-breaking versions of packages.
snip
/snip
One major downside is the upgrade treadmill- Fedora's support for previous
I learned early on in my GNU/Linux experience, the one thing you are is a
developer and doesn't matter if you have never used a compiler before now.
Just think of yourself as a developer and GNU/Linux will work better for you
and have a lot less issues. Basically, a developer is anyone who
On Sep 18, 2008, at 15:06, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Me, I hate stale software, so I tend to always be running at least the
latest Fedora release, if not the current development tree.
I'm a bit more conservative than Jarod, so I run Fedora about 4-5
months into the release cycle. Pretty much all
Bill McGonigle wrote:
On Sep 18, 2008, at 15:06, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Me, I hate stale software, so I tend to always be running at least the
latest Fedora release, if not the current development tree.
snip
unsnip
Bruce, I recall when we went around on this last time most all
FYI for those of you who may be running RedHat or Fedora.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2008-August/msg00012.html
--
-- Thomas
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman
This is an FYI.
On my newish Fedora 8 install. One issue I had is that I can't SSH
in and authenticate using public keys. I get prompted for a password.
Password login works. Just not public key authentication. I can SSH
out with pubkeys, not in, though. Same home directory (multi-boot
When I start a VM, the screen, keyboard and mouse lockup. I have to hit the
big red switch. It doesn't matter what is running in the VM.
I'm running vmware-server 1.04 on Fedora 7 x86_64 kernel 2.6.23.8-34
Dell Optiplex 745 Core Duo
ATI RV516 Radeon X1300 Pro
ati driver fglrx 8.433
On Nov 9, 2007, at 15:47, mike shlitz wrote:
My Vonage conversations , if they go on for any length of time, are
inevitably cutoff and I have to reset the modem to get my internet
service back. Downloads and torrents seem sporadic as well, as was
indicated in several other emails on
On Nov 9, 2007 3:47 PM, mike shlitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... I'm pretty much stuck with Comcast for TV and Internet. I've had
nothing but issues with their internet service ...
My experience has been that consumer Internet performance varies
tremendously by locale. So one guy can love
) is that, with RADSL, the bandwidth
allocated to the upstream and downstream channels is changed according
to which channel is used more. As downstream traffic increases (say,
because you're downloading something like, oh, Fedora 8), bandwidth is
reallocated to the downstream channel and taken away from
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 15:04:36 -0800 (PST)
From: Bayard Coolidge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or be a Comcast customer, unless you're VERY patient.
Took 7.5 hours using BitTorrent, average d/l speed purportedly 145 kb/s.
Started at 10:21 AM EST, and finished just a few minutes ago. D/L
behaviour was
, they're throttling BitTorrent traffic.
Sorry, I don't have any links to support this; this info is purely
from the rumor mill. :)
I downloaded the Fedora DVD distro yesterday using BitTorrent. The 3.2+
GB download only took a few hours and I noticed download speeds bouncing
around 400-500 KBs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I heard, somewhere, that Comcast is actually being sued for violating
net neutrality.
I don't believe that net neutrality is the law of the land. There are
many who argue it may not even be a good idea, but that's beyond this
thread about Fedora by far
Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I heard, somewhere, that Comcast is actually being sued for violating
net neutrality.
Try googling for it as Ted did. There's plenty of new available about
it. Even Congress is aware of it (someone must be up for re-election
From: Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 10:26:25 -0500
Subject: Comcast [ was Fedora Eight is out on the streets!]
Oops, yes. I ought to have changed the subject line. Sorry.
Comcast (and other CATV providers) *still* seem to think of
themselves as a TV provider first
On Nov 9, 2007 11:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead, these companies claimed that, in order
to provide DSL, they had to line share with Verizon and that
(drumroll, please) Verizon had not yet released the rights to line
share for dry loop service.
Yah, the big telcos are just as evil
Hi,
When I lived on the NH seacoast and had DSL, I had no problems. Here in
Temple, NH I'm pretty much stuck with Comcast for TV and Internet. I've had
nothing but issues with their internet service (and I pay for their fastest
speed burst option).
My Vonage conversations , if they go on
On Nov 8, 2007 11:33 AM, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Get onto the BitTorrent ...
Hmmm. Don't set your computer's clock back an hour while BitTorrent
is running, or it gets very confused.
-- Ben
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
Or be a Comcast customer, unless you're VERY patient.
Took 7.5 hours using BitTorrent, average d/l speed purportedly 145 kb/s.
Started at 10:21 AM EST, and finished just a few minutes ago. D/L
behaviour was very bursty, stalling for several minutes at a time and
then cranking at over 900kb/sec.
On Oct 9, 2007, at 08:57, David A. Long wrote:
So it seems to me that Postfix smtpd is never
successfully contacting saslauthd.
What does your
/etc/sysconfig/saslauthd
look like? Mine is:
SOCKETDIR=/var/run/saslauthd
MECH=pam
FLAGS=
for sasl options I have:
David A. Long wrote:
OK, I have been pulling my hair out for a week trying to get a Fedora 7
server configured to use Postfix SMTP for relaying mail from remote
clients. It seems to handle TLS fine when receiving GNHLUG mail.
testsaslauthd reports successful authentication when given
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 08:23 -0400, Lloyd Kvam wrote:
Could you be rejecting unknown (number-to-name lookup fails) IP addresses?
I've been rejecting those as a relatively easy, effective spam control (
reject_unknown_hostname, reject_unknown_client )
I don't think so. I just added the
seems to provide a wrapper to the
underlying command-line tools. I went to the command line simply to get
better error messages.
And that GUI interface worked nicely in Fedora 6.
--
Lloyd Kvam
Venix Corp.
1 Court Street, Suite 378
Lebanon, NH 03766-1358
voice: 603-653-8139
fax:320-210-3409
On 9/11/07, Lloyd Kvam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently upgraded my laptop from fedora 6 to fedora 7. Now I've
discovered I can no longer burn CDs or DVDs.
In the past, I've had trouble with those auto-media-detect-and-mount
daemons trying to auto-mount a disc as I'm trying to write
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 09:08 -0400, Ben Scott wrote:
On 9/11/07, Lloyd Kvam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently upgraded my laptop from fedora 6 to fedora 7. Now I've
discovered I can no longer burn CDs or DVDs.
In the past, I've had trouble with those auto-media-detect-and-mount
On 9/12/07, Lloyd Kvam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Error trying to open /dev/scd0 exclusively (Device or resource
busy)... retrying in 1 second.
That exclusivity error only shows up sometimes. I think the retry
succeeds.
Right, because the auto-thingies all work by polling the device. So
FWIW, I've not had any problems like this w/Gnome/Ubuntu and it has
the automount thingies. the automount stuff does annoy me from time
to time, but it doesn't cause failures when burning CDs or DVDs.
Cheers!
Ty
On 9/12/07, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/12/07, Lloyd Kvam [EMAIL
just need to be careful about fouling up my
fedora 7 stuff.
-- Ben
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
--
Lloyd Kvam
Venix Corp
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 09:08 -0400, Ben Scott wrote:
On 9/11/07, Lloyd Kvam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently upgraded my laptop from fedora 6 to fedora 7. Now I've
discovered I can no longer burn CDs or DVDs.
In the past, I've had trouble with those auto-media-detect-and-mount
the cdrtools from berlios.de and will see if that
makes a difference. I just need to be careful about fouling up my
fedora 7 stuff.
What about going the other way around? Try the GUI CD burner - you
should be able to right-click on the .iso and select Write to
Disc
--
Stephen Ryan
I recently upgraded my laptop from fedora 6 to fedora 7. Now I've
discovered I can no longer burn CDs or DVDs. I have an old CD-R burner,
so this is not critical yet, but I will need to get this figured out.
The drive is identified below in the wodim output, but is a fairly
typical IDE combo
waste and
all that. Converting Physical to Virtual only works from one partition
to another and requires a fair amount of disk space, one of my
limitations here.
1. How do I tell Fedora that /dev/hda ought to be read-write for group
disk? (Currently owned by root, group disk, permissions brw-r
One of my current client projects requires me to VPN into their
establishment. Rather than have a second machine running Windows, I
thought I'd try running VMWare using a dual-boot (WinXPPro/Fedora Core
6) machine. A recent Linux Magazine article by Jason Perlow, Run Your
Windows with VMWare
to another running 'doze box, and import that pre-existing
computer into a VM, which I can now use for testing against the
production environment without crashing the production box.
1. How do I tell Fedora that /dev/hda ought to be read-write for group
disk? (Currently owned by root, group disk
At this point, the subject line has become something of an in-joke,
although I will concede I may be the only one in on it.
Oh no! Actually, I should have known better than to be sipping coffee while
opening this thread... Ah well, that's why there's a stack of keyboards
over there...
And
On 2/26/07, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/26/07, Bayard Coolidge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I was referring to was the quagmire of interdependencies in some
packages that make it difficult/impractical to update to new versions
conveniently.
Libraries enable code re-use. Now
Most people seem to be doing just one distribution. Is anyone else doing
multiples?
I'm running:
Xubuntu on my laptop (I wanted to learn some debianisms)
WinXP on the family PC
MacOSX on the family Macintosh
Fedora on my home server (I grew up w/ RedHat/Mandrake after starting w/
SLS
On 2/27/07, Star [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Next on the adgenda... Gnome is so much better than KDE because...
Oh sure. Ben spends a half an hour crafting 'the perfect intro' to
flame city, and what do you respond with?
A one liner.. Shoulda known part II would suck. :-)
--
-- Thomas
Just Debian at home work, and one of the FC's on a webserver... and
the FC will go away shortly, I don't have enough knowledge of weird
corners to keep it uncrufted under the onslaught of hey I'm
installing foo from the guy I was sharing the server with, who's just
competent enough to be
.
I've got a TiVo and a LinkSys WRT54G, both of which run Linux (and
are entered into the Linux Counter (http://counter.li.org) as such!).
I use Knoppix for rescue and similar purposes on a semi-regular basis.
The GNHLUG server (liberty.gnhlug.org) runs CentOS 4.x, another RHEL clone.
Fedora on my
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 08:59 am, Tom Buskey wrote:
Most people seem to be doing just one distribution. Is anyone else doing
multiples?
Debian Stable on my desktop.
Debian Stable on my laptop.
Debian Stable on home firewall/router/VPN endpoint.
Kubuntu on wife's laptop and Win2K on wife's
Sun systems, Macintosh 68k systems, PCs and an SGI
Indy that I might run every now and then.
I use Knoppix for rescue and similar purposes on a semi-regular basis.
And they're awesome to give out to people asking 'Hey, what's this linux
thing?'
For servers, I recommend CentOS over Fedora. It's
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 09:59 am, Ben Scott wrote:
LVM (which I use extensively) is really nice for trying multiple
distributions. Virtualization (VMware, Xen, etc.) is making that
practice obsolete, but at least right now, IME, a VM is still not the
same as running something on the
OSX On my Macbook (with a WinXP Parallels VM for work stuff)
Ubuntu Server on my colo server
Ubuntu Server on my home server (file/print)
KnoppMyth on my new MythTV box in the basement
and a mix of CentOS and Fedora at work
I also have an old Dell laptop for a backup that runs WinXP.
On Feb
1 - 100 of 242 matches
Mail list logo
