Re: [gobolinux-devel] Verify_Superuser

On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Hisham Muhammad wrote: > Hi, > > I'm going through some annoyances in my brand new Gobo 015 > installation that are related to the handling of sudo in our Scripts. > > The symptom is that some Gobo scripts fail halfway through with > permission errors when run with

Re: [gobolinux-devel] systemd

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Trans wrote: > Why did Gobo go with its own init system instead of using systemd? Would the > same decision be made now? Lack of plutonium for the DeLorean. I think systemd would be pragmatic now, particularly because udev is going to be increasingly difficult to r

[gobolinux-devel] Kernel recipe arch detection

Hi, In trying to look at the other kernel issues people reported I had repeated odd failures, which I eventually tracked down to this in the 3.2.12 recipe (new from 3.2.7): make_variables=( ARCH=`grep flags /proc/cpuinfo | grep -q " lm " && echo x86_64 || echo i686` ) (and several other p

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Preliminary 014.10 system tarball

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Michael Homer wrote: > The tarball is at > <http://mwh.geek.nz/files/gobo/014.10/gobo-014.10-mwh-20120226.tar.bz2> > (again, 1.6GiB). Everything is inside a "gobo" directory, and the > contents of that should be put in the root of the

[gobolinux-devel] Preliminary 014.10 system tarball

Hi, I've been working on getting things back up to date for a while now, with the idea of hopefully getting a CD out with a reasonable upgrade path. I've been updating the recipes for things and building binary packages as I go, which are in . In part

Re: [gobolinux-devel] gobohide icot: operation not supported

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Cvetoslav Ludmiloff wrote: > Hi, > I've just compiled the 3.1.1 kernel (again). > Checked about GOBOHIDE_FS and it is present: > > [cl@caprosts ~]$ zgrep CONFIG_GOBOHIDE_FS /proc/config.gz > CONFIG_GOBOHIDE_FS=y > [cl@caprosts ~]$ > > but gobohide utility still not

Re: [gobolinux-devel] gobohide icot: operation not supported

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Cvetoslav Ludmiloff wrote: > Hi all > I've patched kernel 3.2.1 and 3.1.1 with gobohide patch and all is compiled > ok. Distribution is Arch Linux, file system Ext4. > But when I execute gobohide utility I only get ioctl: Operation not > supported. Could you help

Re: [gobolinux-devel] small fix on Scripts for unionfs-fuse

On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Guilherme Bedin wrote: > Hi, > > I did a small fix on UnionFS function just change the $dirs variable > that doesn't exist > on the Union_Mount function to the $2 argument. > >  --- UnionFS.old 2011-11-23 14:14:31.0 -0200 > +++ UnionFS     2011-11-23 14:14:

Re: [gobolinux-devel] 014.10

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Leandro Motta Barros wrote: > Hello! > > I am using the packages from > http://mwh.geek.nz/files/gobo/014.10/packages/ to make a major update > to my system, which was presenting some problems after these years of > small updates over small updates. I am doing alm

Re: [gobolinux-devel] New kernel recipe available

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Lucas C. Villa Real wrote: > Hi there, folks, > > After hearing from Michael that the kernel recipe wasn't up to date > due to some problems with Gobohide I gave it the long deserved > attention that it was needing. There were also changes to the Gobohide > userspac

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Mixed recipe types (or: always allow to use manifest-array in recipes).

On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Olle wrote: > Hi, > > I have been away for a while, but i haven't seen this committed. > Should we discuss it more and come up with other ideas or is this an > ok way to do it? Whoops. Sorry, I forgot to come back to this. Well, nobody's objected, so I've applied t

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Aften 0.0.8 - cmake bug

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Fábio Mierlo wrote: > Hello, > > I just managed to compile this cmake package explicitly assigning > needs_build_directory=yes, even with the cmake_init() having already > assigned this variable to yes. > > I need hack into RecipeLint to packed it too > (needs_buil

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-commits] r4366 - trunk/Scripts/bin

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Kevin Quick wrote: > On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 21:26:57 -0700, Michael Homer > wrote: > >> In fact, following up on this further, it seems that Alien-Cabal doesn't >> ever >> work at all. All it does is spew files all over the filesyst

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-commits] r4366 - trunk/Scripts/bin

On Saturday 07 August 2010 16:13:08 m...@svn.gobolinux.org wrote: > Author: mwh > Date: 2010-08-06 21:13:08 -0700 (Fri, 06 Aug 2010) > New Revision: 4366 > > Modified: >trunk/Scripts/bin/Alien-Cabal > Log: > Remove debugging log that makes Cabal unportable > > Modified: trunk/Scripts/bin/Alie

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Mixed recipe types (or: always allow to use manifest-array in recipes).

On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Olle wrote: > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 21:30, Olle wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am trying to build a package using scons. However, the library in >> question does not have an install target in it's scons file. The file >> is generated in the directory you compiles it in.

Re: [gobolinux-devel] confusing ContributeRecipe failure

On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 9:30 PM, MJ Ray wrote: > Michael Homer wrote: >> I have just tried those commands and submitted successfully >> (<http://recipes.gobolinux.org/review/1280443951-24418/michael_homer/GnuPG--1.4.10>). >> Perhaps there was a network error that cu

Re: [gobolinux-devel] confusing ContributeRecipe failure

On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:23 AM, MJ Ray wrote: > OK, here's my second stupid question of the week!  When I try to run > ContributeRecipe GnuPG 1.4.10 as suggested after NewVersion --source > 1.4.9 GnuPG 1.4.10 && Compile GnuPG 1.4.10, I get the following > strange response: > > GetRecipe: Trying t

Re: [gobolinux-devel] problems updating Postfix, less than helpful output

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:52 AM, MJ Ray wrote: > Hi all - I'm having some problems with updating the Postfix recipe. > > I've updated to latest Scripts and Compile by InstallPackage and > the recipe being used is a simple NewVersion Postfix 2.7.1. > Even with --verbose, it finishes with the less t

Re: [gobolinux-devel] StartRootless status

On Thursday 22 July 2010 04:38:40 Michael McNeil Forbes wrote: > Michael Homer writes: > > I have seen > > your 2.3 patch linked from the tracker and need to think on it a > > little more - it looks right, but I think actual 2.3 compatibility has > > long since bee

Re: [gobolinux-devel] /S/Aliens: Status..?

On Saturday 17 July 2010 06:31:52 dj wrote: > Hey, > > whats the state of the /S/Aliens system..? Is there a bugtracker so I can > watch the progress? A project homepage or something like that..? It is operational in current Scripts. Right now it supports Cabal, CPAN, LuaRocks, and RubyGems. Inte

Re: [gobolinux-devel] StartRootless status

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Michael McNeil Forbes wrote: > Hisham writes: >> Michael Homer gobolinux.org> wrote: >> > Baffo 32 wrote: >> >> I think it would be appropriate to move the StartRootless script >> >> outside of the CreateRootless scr

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Bug in NewVersion?

On Friday 11 June 2010 07:43:40 Hisham wrote: > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Michael Homer wrote: > > There is an issue of inconsistency with every other component of the > > system - LocalRecipes are preferred everywhere else at the same version, > > which is usually

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Bug in NewVersion?

On Thursday 10 June 2010 12:03:18 Leandro Motta Barros wrote: > Hello, > > This is one of those vague I-think-I-found-bug report we all hate :-) > > I recently ran "NewVersion Emacs 23.2", and I think that somehow it > created the new version from the wrong version. I don't know exactly > the ste

Re: [gobolinux-devel] UnionFS Implemented?

On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Rehan wrote: > I have found that on a vanilla install of 014, updating Compile does not > update the settings file which has the configuration for union filesystem (I > believe I selected ‘use new’ but could be wrong). You can copy the latest > settings from the /P

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Distcc with Compile?

On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Lucas C. Villa Real wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Anshuman Aggarwal > wrote: >> Sounds like a project, I'd like to get my hands dirty with especially with >> the google 'pump' mode modifications. would tremendously speed up my >> compiles across my p

[gobolinux-devel] [ANN] Scripts 2.10.2, Compile 1.13.3 released

Hi all, More releases, all bugfixes this time. Scripts has a fix for the man directory path in PrepareProgram (actually used by Compile), and handles dependency conversion better. It also includes updates to the database used by the CommandNotFound system as usual. The only notable behaviour ch

Re: [gobolinux-devel] StartRootless status

On Monday 19 April 2010 00:58:54 Baffo 32 wrote: > Some time ago I reported http://bugs.gobolinux.org/view.php?id=386 and > http://bugs.gobolinux.org/view.php?id=388 . Rootless doesn't work (for > me at least) on linux, due to what I'm assuming are missing CFLAGS > settings. > > I have added a pat

Re: [gobolinux-devel] UnionFS Implemented?

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Eugene Yang wrote: > Just out of curiosity - is the UnionFS Sandbox actually implemented? > With the latest update of Compile, it seems to check for the availability of > unionfs when installing packages..  Will release 15 come with unionfs > support? It has been i

Re: [gobolinux-devel] BuildLiveCD problem

On Tuesday 20 April 2010 02:19:22 Demian Florentin wrote: > Hello, i have these files, let me know where can I upload them and I will. > > BusyBox-InitRD--20060202-SVN--i686.tar.bz2 > CD-Bootloader-i686.tar.bz2 > Files-Fonts.tar.bz2 > InitRDScripts--20091229--i686.tar.bz2 > MiniUdev--0.1--i686.tar

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Patch for Compile/bin/RecipeLint; Issue with zero-padded version numbers (Bash 4.1.002)

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Baffo 32 wrote: > The recipe store currently contains two conflicting copies of Bash: > 4.1.002 (from me) and 4.1.2 (from Jonas Karlsson).  4.1.2 works fine, > but 4.1.002 will not compile due to extraneous patches. > > Unfortunately, GetRecipe (and hence Compile)

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Patch to Scripts/bin/PrepareProgram to resolve incorrect mandir

On Thursday 22 April 2010 12:18:22 Baffo 32 wrote: > Current SVN PrepareProgram passes "--mandir=/Shared/man" to > ./configure due to unset value for $target when it is used. Replacing > $target with $programdir resolves the issue. Patch is attached. Thanks, applied. I am going to make tools rel

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Distcc with Compile?

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Anshuman Aggarwal wrote: > Is this documented somewhere? Using distcc with Compile? Does Compile > support it natively? I believe people have set it up before, or I recall an effort towards it at least. I don't know how far they got. There is no specific native sup

Re: [gobolinux-devel] BuildLiveCD problem

On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 1:28 AM, Rehan wrote: > Hi > > I’m trying to build an updated 0.14 LiveCD. > The UpdateEnvironment script is looking for files on gobo.calica.com which > is throwing up 404 errors. The files in livecd-devel seem to have been lost. Packages are available from gytha.org by rs

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Patch to Scripts/bin/CheckDependencies for converting missing dependencies

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Baffo 32 wrote: > Hi, > > It seems "CheckDependencies --mode=convert" fails to notice if a > (perhaps optional) dependency is not actually present on the system, > and in such a case outputs a bogus line of the format "Dep >=" . > > I've been leaving a lot of depen

Re: [gobolinux-devel] help regarding patching the linux

On Tuesday 23 February 2010 19:33:37 rajkumar vbalakrishnasamy wrote: > This is the *ls *output of my current working directory: > [r...@localhost 2.6.29.1-r1]# ls -l > total 460 > -rw-r--r--. 1 user user 22193 2009-04-27 00:35 01-gobohide.patch > -rw-r--r--. 1 user user 342772 2009-04-27 00:35 >

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [ANN] Compile 1.13.2 released

On Wednesday 17 February 2010 12:50:07 jhatungim...@netscape.net wrote: > Michael, > > I am testing the latest 015 and found 2 intriguing problems: >1) Two commands [chmod u+x ... and export EDITOR=vim] when issued in the > terminal window cause xfce to exit all running apps, show a blank scr

[gobolinux-devel] [ANN] Compile 1.13.2 released

Hello there, Another release, all bug fixes this time. This release fixes functionality of CMake recipes and others that rely on setting certain options for all recipes of their type. It also corrects the behaviour of the using_X() useflag functions to allow overriding values set in the recipe b

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-commits] r4331 - branches/015/Scripts/Functions

On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Jonas Karlsson wrote: > On 5 February 2010 18:56, Lucas C. Villa Real wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 3:33 PM,   wrote: >>> Author: mohjive >>> Date: 2010-02-05 09:33:15 -0800 (Fri, 05 Feb 2010) >>> New Revision: 4331 >>> >>> Modified: >>>   branches/015/Scripts/F

[gobolinux-devel] [ANN] Freshen 3.1.0 released

Hi all, Here's another Freshen release. It has native support for the Aliens infrastructure, but there are no other substantive changes. An alien dependency will be flagged as "A" in the listing and be installed via the Alien structure directly, rather than via Compile or InstallPackage. The pa

[gobolinux-devel] [ANN] Scripts 2.10.1, Compile 1.13.1, and BootScripts 2.1.6 released

Hi all, Yes, more releases. The changes in all cases are mostly bug fixes, but there are also some improvements to the version-handling for alien dependencies contributed by Kevin Quick, and new Aliens support for the Cabal system. There is a new BootScripts release this time around as well, lon

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Scripts 2.10.1rc1 and Compile 1.13.1rc1

On Friday 15 January 2010 12:19:19 Guilherme Bedin wrote: > bash: > /Programs/Bash/3.1 > > and I was running StopTask and StartTask Ok. I think we need a new BootScripts release then. I thought there was one, but apparently not. Until then, if you're using dash as /bin/sh you need to use SVN Bo

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Scripts 2.10.1rc1 and Compile 1.13.1rc1

On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Guilherme Bedin wrote: > Hi, > >  I just download it and here, and I am getting a small error > > /Programs/Scripts/Current/bin/../Functions/GoboLinux: line 640: syntax > error near unexpected token `<' > /Programs/Scripts/Current/bin/../Functions/GoboLinux: line

[gobolinux-devel] Scripts 2.10.1rc1 and Compile 1.13.1rc1

Gentle readers, A point release of both Scripts and Compile is upcoming, probably this weekend. This is the first and hopefully last release candidate. The changes are mostly bugfixes, but there are also some improvements to the version- handling for alien dependencies contributed by Kevin Quick.

[gobolinux-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Scripts 2.10.0 and Compile 1.13.0 released

Hi there, Another release, and a minor version bump for both tools. The major update in these releases is the inclusion of the /System/Aliens feature in both. There has also been a change in the default mirror configuration that you will need to update your GetAvailable.conf for. The /System/Al

[gobolinux-devel] Release candidates: Scripts 2.10.0rc1 and Compile 1.13.0rc1

Hi all, These are the first release candidates of Scripts 2.10.0 and Compile 1.13.0, and if there are no major issues the final release will be sometime this weekend. The major addition in both tools is the /System/Aliens structure, which is why they have had a minor version bump. This allows p

[gobolinux-devel] Package mirrors

Hi all, So, since gobo.calica.com appears to be down for the count, we need to rejig our mirrors. It's listed as the top mirror in GetAvailable.conf by default, and it was the master. That means the other mirrors aren't updating at all, and that the recipes.gobolinux.org search shows zero packag

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Python 3

On Saturday 19 December 2009 19:27:10 Lucas C. Villa Real wrote: > Hi there, > > I was compiling some packages for 015 tonight when I realized that, > after having built Python 3.1.1, some of our scripts started to fail > to execute. What's the idea for 015? Are we going to stay with Python > 2 an

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Behavior of Use-Flags

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Hisham wrote: > Hello, > > I realized I don't understand the current use-flags based dependency system. > > Case in point: Compile pidgin > > ./configure of Pidgin fails because GStreamer is missing -- in fact, I > don't have /Programs/GStreamer. > GStreamer is lis

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-commits] r4198 - branches/015/Scripts

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Lucas C. Villa Real wrote: > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Jonas Karlsson wrote: >> 2009/12/8  : >>> Author: lucasvr >>> Date: 2009-12-08 02:56:57 -0800 (Tue, 08 Dec 2009) >>> New Revision: 4198 >>> >>> Added: >>>   branches/015/Scripts/share/ >>> Removed: >>>  

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-commits] r4158 - in trunk/Installer: bin src

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Lucas C. Villa Real wrote: > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Jonas Karlsson wrote: >> 2009/12/4  : >>> Author: lucasvr >>> Date: 2009-12-03 20:21:10 -0800 (Thu, 03 Dec 2009) >>> New Revision: 4158 >>> >>> Modified: >>>   trunk/Installer/bin/GoboLinuxInstaller >>>

Re: [gobolinux-devel] /System/Aliens progress and an invitation to contribute wrappers

On Monday 30 November 2009 16:58:35 Michael Homer wrote: > I also invite contributions of wrappers for other systems. So far > everything has been working with LuaRocks because it's simple and because > we have a couple of advantages when any questions about the system come >

[gobolinux-devel] /System/Aliens progress and an invitation to contribute wrappers

On Saturday 28 November 2009 05:30:14 Hisham wrote: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Michael Homer wrote: > > On Wednesday 04 November 2009 11:06:33 Jonas Karlsson wrote: > >> 2009/11/2 Michael Homer : > >> > On Monday 02 November 2009 21:31:35 m...@svn.gobolinux.

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-commits] r4110 - trunk/Scripts/bin

On Wednesday 04 November 2009 11:06:33 Jonas Karlsson wrote: > 2009/11/2 Michael Homer : > > On Monday 02 November 2009 21:31:35 m...@svn.gobolinux.org wrote: > >> Author: mwh > >> Date: 2009-11-02 00:31:35 -0800 (Mon, 02 Nov 2009) > >> New Revision: 4110 > &

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-commits] r4110 - trunk/Scripts/bin

On Monday 02 November 2009 21:31:35 m...@svn.gobolinux.org wrote: > Author: mwh > Date: 2009-11-02 00:31:35 -0800 (Mon, 02 Nov 2009) > New Revision: 4110 > > Added: >trunk/Scripts/bin/Alien-LuaRocks > Log: > Add Alien-LuaRocks script, implementing the Aliens interface. > > This script gives a

[gobolinux-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Scripts 2.9.11 and Compile 1.12.4 released

Hi all, We are pleased to announce the release of Scripts 2.9.11 and Compile 1.12.4. These releases do not contain many major functional changes, with the focus mostly on bug fixes and similar improvements leading up to 015 (of which more below). In Scripts, several programs will now offer sugg

Re: [gobolinux-devel] gobolinux.org

On Wednesday 16 September 2009 19:27:45 Michael Homer wrote: > Hi, > It looks like that's been moved to a new server, which most obviously has > changed the host key, but also seems to have broken the scripts that were > running there. The recipe store hasn't updated from

[gobolinux-devel] gobolinux.org

Hi, It looks like that's been moved to a new server, which most obviously has changed the host key, but also seems to have broken the scripts that were running there. The recipe store hasn't updated from trunk lately; I'm not sure if anything else isn't running. I also don't know how to fix it

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Paper for linux.conf.au 2010

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Michael Homer wrote: > Hi all, > Since linux.conf.au[1] falls on my doorstep next year I really don't have any > excuse not to go, so I'm considering submitting a paper on GoboLinux. It'd be > nice to drum up some exposure around he

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Capitalized char in recipe version

On Friday 04 September 2009 15:23:48 Fábio Mierlo wrote: > Hi, > > do not allow a capitalized char in recipe is a expect behaviour? Yes. [0-9a-z._] only, like what it says. -Michael signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. __

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Paper for linux.conf.au 2010

On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Michael Homer wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Michael Homer wrote: >> On Wednesday 22 July 2009 17:50:31 Hisham wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Michael Homer wrote: >>> > On Tuesday 21 July 2009 15:03:25 Hisham w

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Paper for linux.conf.au 2010

Thanks, lots of good comments in here. I've tried to incorporate them into the abstract where possible, the rest I've made note of for the full thing if and when (there's only so much room right now...). On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Isaac Dupree wrote: > Michael Homer wrote

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Paper for linux.conf.au 2010

On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Michael Homer wrote: > On Wednesday 22 July 2009 17:50:31 Hisham wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Michael Homer wrote: >> > On Tuesday 21 July 2009 15:03:25 Hisham wrote: >> >> I really liked it. How long is the abstr

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Paper for linux.conf.au 2010

On Wednesday 22 July 2009 17:50:31 Hisham wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Michael Homer wrote: > > On Tuesday 21 July 2009 15:03:25 Hisham wrote: > >> I really liked it. How long is the abstract supposed to be, is there a > >> word/character limit? > >

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Paper for linux.conf.au 2010

On Tuesday 21 July 2009 15:03:25 Hisham wrote: > On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Michael Homer wrote: > > The abstract is due this coming Friday, though I intend to submit it a > > few days before. Here's a draft(-ish) for that, and also for the paper > > itself if it

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Paper for linux.conf.au 2010

On Friday 03 July 2009 05:24:55 Hisham wrote: > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:51 AM, Michael Homer wrote: > > Hi all, > > Since linux.conf.au[1] falls on my doorstep next year I really don't have > > any excuse not to go, so I'm considering submitting a paper on GoboLin

[gobolinux-devel] Paper for linux.conf.au 2010

Hi all, Since linux.conf.au[1] falls on my doorstep next year I really don't have any excuse not to go, so I'm considering submitting a paper on GoboLinux. It'd be nice to drum up some exposure around here, and also to expand that "Academic Publications" section on the site. I've talked it over

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Branch tools for 015

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Lucas C. Villa Real wrote: > On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Jonas Karlsson wrote: >> There are some things I'd like to change in Compile and Scripts for >> 015 that may not be optimal to release before that. >> First I'd like to change default behaviour of Compil

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Branch tools for 015

On Saturday 30 May 2009 20:49:14 Jonas Karlsson wrote: > There are some things I'd like to change in Compile and Scripts for > 015 that may not be optimal to release before that. > First I'd like to change default behaviour of Compile to use > /System/Index. I wasn't aware that /S/I was sufficientl

[gobolinux-devel] [ANN] Scripts 2.9.10 release candidate

Hi all, Scripts has got some attention and now it's time for a new release. This is a release candidate that will make it to final this Sunday, unless any showstoppers arise before then. This is a bugfix release with only minor changes. The changes are in use flags, that InstallPackage now in

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Contributing to gobolinux

On Sunday 19 April 2009 15:59:07 Diogo Dutra wrote: > On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Michael Homer wrote: > > You would need to explain better what you meant, but the answer is likely > > to be no, there's no such plan, we don't think that the additional > > func

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Contributing to gobolinux

On Sunday 19 April 2009 06:17:36 Diogo Dutra wrote: > Hi guys, > I wanna to contribute to gobolinux, I liked a lot the system, and I > think this is promissor. > But I think the support to users is not good, I have sent a mail to > this list and I have no reply about the question.. It wasn't a supp

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Bug in symlinking of settings?

On Friday 03 April 2009 12:07:05 Daed Lee wrote: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Michael Homer wrote: > > On Friday 03 April 2009 11:00:09 Daed Lee wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Jonas Karlsson > > > > wrote: > >> >>

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Bug in symlinking of settings?

On Friday 03 April 2009 11:00:09 Daed Lee wrote: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Jonas Karlsson wrote: > >> This results in the following duplicate paths: > >> > >> /System/Settings/httpd/conf (a directory that contains the mod_php5.conf > >> file) > >> > >> and > >> > >> /Programs/HTTPD/Setti

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Bug in symlinking of settings?

On Wednesday 01 April 2009 15:02:02 Daed Lee wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Daed Lee wrote: > > The behavior that I was expecting was for the /System/Settings/httpd > > symlink to be followed so that both the > > /Programs/HTTPD/Settings/httpd/conf/mod_php5.conf and > > /Programs/HTTPD/

Re: [gobolinux-devel] GoboLinux requests

Looking through the archives for something else I noticed this and that it never got a response when it should have; I'll try now. On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:17 AM, CR wrote: > Hi all. > > My problems with Gobo stem from installing/compiling big packages with > complicated or large dependencies.

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-commits] r3941 - trunk/Scripts/bin

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Lucas C. Villa Real wrote: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 5:23 AM,   wrote: >> Author: mwh >> Date: 2009-03-22 01:23:39 -0700 (Sun, 22 Mar 2009) >> New Revision: 3941 >> >> Modified: >>   trunk/Scripts/bin/UseFlags >> Log: >> Fix bare UseFlags run, with no program speci

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Compile dir detection

On Friday 20 March 2009 16:23:46 Nick Matteo wrote: > I am not sure about the necessity for the 'dir' argument in Recipes. > Right now, I am trying to update the Foomatic recipe for 4.0, and it > has a mess in it about figuring out what the $dir should be. > > It would seem reasonable to examine th

Re: [gobolinux-devel] GSoC mentoring applications now open

On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Michael Homer wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Michael Homer wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Michael Homer wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:03 AM, João Felipe Santos >>> wrote: >>>> Yes, I

Re: [gobolinux-devel] GSoC mentoring applications now open

On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Michael Homer wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Michael Homer wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:03 AM, João Felipe Santos >> wrote: >>> Yes, I know you'll think "he's sending us this because he wants to >&

Re: [gobolinux-devel] GSoC mentoring applications now open

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Michael Homer wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:03 AM, João Felipe Santos > wrote: >> Yes, I know you'll think "he's sending us this because he wants to >> apply as a student" :) >> >> This site [1] is th

Re: [gobolinux-devel] svn is offline

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:10 AM, João Felipe Santos wrote: > Hello, > > just tried to access svn.gobolinux.org and it returned a 403 error. Back up. WebSVN is disabled for security reasons at the moment, but an SVN client or web browser can still access the repositories. -Michael

Re: [gobolinux-devel] GSoC mentoring applications now open

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:03 AM, João Felipe Santos wrote: > Yes, I know you'll think "he's sending us this because he wants to > apply as a student" :) > > This site [1] is the place for applying. I think one has to login and > find a form to do this. I hope GoboLinux is accepted and also hope >

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Rewrote 'DescribeProgram' in Bash to use R/Description files instead.

On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Xavier Gomes Pinho wrote: > > Hi! > > Since i was told [0] that 'DescribeProgram' wasn't being maintained and > you were accepting improvements, i decided to give it a try. > > I rewrote it in Bash and now it uses R/Description files instead of > /F/Descriptions/* >

Re: [gobolinux-devel] trying to get back at work on CompileFarm

On Thursday 26 February 2009 05:18:09 João Felipe Santos wrote: > Hello. > > Last year I started working on CompileFarm but real life struck me > down and I could not keep messing with the code. Now I hope I'll get > to manage my schedule and will try to give it some love :) Any > advancements on i

[gobolinux-devel] Summer of Code 2009

Hi all, It's that time of year again. It'd be nice to get in after the mishap last year, though the program details imply they're going to accept fewer applications this time around. So fingers crossed. I've updated our project ideas page (

[gobolinux-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Compile 1.12.0 and Scripts 2.9.8

Hi all, We are pleased to announce the final release of new versions of the system tools. Compile 1.12.0 is a major update introducing the new recipe API and is a progressive step towards chroot-by-default, while Scripts 2.9.8 is a bugfix release also containing some supporting internals changes

[gobolinux-devel] Multi-rule dependencies (was Re: [Gobolinux-recipes] Recipe Review: Apache-Ant 1.7.1_bin)

On Thursday 12 February 2009 10:31:10 Michael Homer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Jonas Karlsson wrote: > > 2009/2/11 Giambattista Bloisi : > >> - Eclipse-ECJ and Apache-Ant are shipped along with a few executables > >> that require java to be run. I re

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [Gobolinux-recipes] Recipe Review: Apache-Ant 1.7.1_bin

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Jonas Karlsson wrote: > 2009/2/11 Giambattista Bloisi : >> - Eclipse-ECJ and Apache-Ant are shipped along with a few executables that >> require java to be run. I realize that a recipe without dependencies is not >> acceptable, but since we are going to have three

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-users] Scripts 2.9.8rc1 and Compile 1.12.0rc1

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Xavier Gomes Pinho wrote: > Hi!, > Glad to hear that new versions are about to be released soon. > Congratulations and keep up your amazing work so far. > > I've just installed both packages and have to report that only > Compile is not working as expected. > > Wh

[gobolinux-devel] Scripts 2.9.8rc1 and Compile 1.12.0rc1

Hi all, Here are the first release candidates of the new versions of the system tools. Compile 1.12.0 will introduce the new recipe API and is a progressive step towards chroot-by-default, while Scripts 2.9.8 is a bugfix release also containing some supporting internals changes. Installing a progr

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-commits] r3859 - trunk/Scripts/Functions

On Friday 06 February 2009 10:05:58 Lucas C. Villa Real wrote: > On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Michael Homer wrote: > > On Friday 06 February 2009 09:05:03 luca...@svn.gobolinux.org wrote: > >> Author: lucasvr > >> Date: 2009-02-05 12:05:02 -0800 (Thu, 05 Feb 20

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-commits] r3859 - trunk/Scripts/Functions

On Friday 06 February 2009 09:05:03 luca...@svn.gobolinux.org wrote: > Author: lucasvr > Date: 2009-02-05 12:05:02 -0800 (Thu, 05 Feb 2009) > New Revision: 3859 > > Modified: >trunk/Scripts/Functions/GoboLinux > Log: > Fixed typo from revision 3826. > > Modified: trunk/Scripts/Functions/GoboLin

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Release candidate of Scripts 2.9.7

On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Jonas Karlsson wrote: > Hello, > Scritps have seen some bugfixes recently, so it's time for a new > release. No new interface or changed behaviour, just a plain bugfix > release. > > The rc tarball can be found at the following address: > http://karlsson.sytes.net

Re: [gobolinux-devel] GMan - A Manager for GNOME

On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Andrew Stormont wrote: > Hi, > >> I don't know just how far in you are, but you might find it nice >> to use AbsTk to build the interface and add GTK+ support to it, so it >> would work everywhere > > I had thought about it, and I may very well do in the future. G

Re: [gobolinux-devel] GMan - A Manager for GNOME

On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 3:29 AM, Andrew Stormont wrote: > Hi, > > I just wanted to let you guys know I've been working on an alternative to > Manager written in PyGTK, GMan. > > Right now GMan has some GNOME dependencies, but if enough people complain > I'll ditch them. > > I also only supports pa

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Scripts 2.9.6rc1, Compile 1.11.4rc1

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:02 AM, David Karell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > Why is this at all needed you may ask? Well, if at some time in the future > we'd like to have common patches for x86 processors, they should probably > look into either i686 or x86_64 directory (depending on 32-bit o

[gobolinux-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Scripts 2.9.6rc1, Compile 1.11.4rc1

Hi all, It's time for another Scripts and Compile release candidate (yes, already!). The most vital change here is a fix for the GetAvailable hang that cropped up every so often in the last release. Thanks to Giambattista Bloisi for doing all the legwork tracking that down and fixing all the bug

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-commits] r3722 - in trunk/Scripts: Functions Resources/Defaults/Settings src

On Thursday 06 November 2008 16:03:42 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: lucasvr > Date: 2008-11-05 19:03:41 -0800 (Wed, 05 Nov 2008) > New Revision: 3722 > > Modified: >trunk/Scripts/Functions/UnionFS >trunk/Scripts/Resources/Defaults/Settings/completion.bash >trunk/Scripts/src/Makefil

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Some ideas about useflags

On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Laércio Benedito de Sousa Júnior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - Useflags descriptions: > > I think every Recipe that has useflags should have a short description about > the purpose of enabling each of them, because, in some cases, this effect > isn't as trivial as

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-commits] r3704 - trunk/Scripts/bin

On Monday 03 November 2008 02:58:15 Giambattista Bloisi wrote: > Michael Homer wrote: > > On Sunday 02 November 2008 18:32:39 Lucas C. Villa Real wrote: > >> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 7:42 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Author: mwh > >>> D

  1   2   3   >