On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:54:31 -0400, Knutson, Sam wrote:
If you observe daylight savings time, run RMF Monitor III, and make the
time change automatically using an ETR (or not) I would appreciate it if you
could check and see if you had this happen and contact me.
Tried it on the sandbox:
Richards, Robert B. wrote:
D BOB RICHARDS,STATUS
BOB777I 18.19.16 BOBINFO DISPLAY
HEART REIPLED AT 11.55.20 ON 03/07/2008
LUNGS REIPLED AT 08.30.00 ON 03/08/2008
BRAIN REINITIALIZED 08.00.00 ON 03/10/2008 (GREAT DRUGS)
F BOB,TIME=1440
F BOB,PERF=MAX
C CIGARS,ALL
--
Radoslaw
Welcome back. Your continued presence on this list is greatly
appreciated.
Tom Puddicombe
Mainframe Performance Capacity Planning
CSC North American Public Sector - Civil Group
(203) 949-1401
(860) 428-3252 (cell)
Computer Sciences Corporation
Registered Office: 2100 East Grand Avenue, El
I used the example on the IBM website to get the maintenance for z/OS
V1R8. I am getting the following message:
Connecting to: dispsd-76.boulder.ibm.com 207.25.253.76 port: 21.
Connection to server interrupted or timed out. Initial connection
Std Return Code = 1, Error Code = 8
Is
We are just about to start the migration from z/OS 1.7 to z/OS 1.9.
Would someone provide a ballpark percentage increase in the amount of
CPU resources between the two releases so we can estimate the monthly
increase in our z/OS base monthly billing?
TIA,
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John S. Giltner, Jr.
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 10:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: z/OS and Linux on same z/VM Image
Dinesh wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to have
Xu,
Yes, when I did the command (via SDSF) it showed me the extents. Below is a
sample:
FLAGS -VOLSER-USER-CATALOG NAME %
Y---R- ZWCF04 0001 UCAT.SYSPLEX.CRORRYJ00
Hi,
I am trying to expire a volume that has a catalog on it. The only entry
in the catalog is the VVDS for the volume it resides on. I attempted:
DELETE SYS1.VVDS.VABST01 FILE(DD1) SCR -
CATALOG(CATALOG.TABS)
I got: IDC3009I ** VSAM CATALOG RETURN CODE IS 50 - REASON CODE IS
I meant to say: I printed the VVDS and it has some entries for a few
catalogs in it, so I attempted:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dean Montevago
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 9:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Problems
If the UCATs do not exist, export them with a DCON (see the FM). This
should clean up the VVDS.
If that fails use DELETE VVR RECOVERY. The RECOVERY options tells VSAM
the volume has been destroyed and is being recovered.
HTH,
snip
I am trying to expire a volume that has a catalog on it. The
Is there a way to restrict jobs from running it a particular job class?
Is
there
more than one way and if so, what is the easiest? TIA
I did this with IEFUJI, as it prevents users from changing the jobclass
after it has been submitted. I used RACROUTE for CLASS=FACILITY and ENTITY
JOBNAME.x.
But, I find it hard to read one-line e-mails, with 30 line disclaimers.
Non-dissemination clauses have no relevance in public forums such as IBM-MAIN.
The only disclaimers that *are* relevant would be those such as
This is my personal opinion, not necessarily that of my employer
and,
To the question of DASD type. For Linux you can user either CKD or FBA.
But for z/OS you have to use CKD. z/OS does not understand FBA disks.
--
Mark Pace
Mainline Information Systems
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
I'm surprised to think that one would still have FBA on the floor!
Daniel McLaughlin
Z-Series Systems Programmer
Information Communications Technology
Crawford Company
4680 N. Royal Atlanta
Tucker GA 30084
phone: 770-621-3256
fax: 770-621-3237
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web:
Really weird today. Yesterday checked everything twice , three times and all
looked ok. Tried again this morning, still no joy. Just after your message
Mark, I decided to re-boot all systems in sysplex. Now its reporting just as
I wanted. One of those days. Cheers
Crispin Hugo
Systems
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:57:01 -, Crispin Hugo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is it possible to do RMF Postprocessor reports for XCF from the
Sysplex Data Server Buffers ? When I try I get
ERB106I PPS: NO SMF RECORDS FOUND FOR FOLLOWING OPTION(S)
ERB106I PPS: REPORTS(XCF), SMF RECORD 74 -
Allan,
Thanks !
Regards,
Dean
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Bob,
Great to hear your back and on-line as well. Looks like your new
maintenance upgrade is working well. Take life easy for a while.
Regards
Mark Ediger
Acxiom
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Richards, Robert B.
Sent:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:54:31 -0400, Knutson, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the time change here an anomaly occurred in RMF.
I opened a PMR on this but we have only the WTO message which occurred on
every system in the Sysplex when the ETR changed the time.
There are no hits for the ERB307I
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:54:37 -0500, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
23 days for a SEV4 from PMR to shipment. Phenomenal!
Wish I could get that kind of service from Sun/STK! :-)
(just kidding)
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich
Almost everything is REALLY FBA now. DS8xxx, DS6xxx, etc. All FBA, doing
CKD emulation. z/VM and z/VSE give you the option to use it as FBA and
remove the CKD emulation layer.
Come on z/OS, get with the program.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Daniel McLaughlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:22:07 -0400, Tom Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to restrict jobs from running it a particular job class?
Is
there
more than one way and if so, what is the easiest? TIA
I did this with IEFUJI, as it prevents users from changing the jobclass
after it has
Bob,
Just remember to hug that pillow when you need to cough/sneeze.
Good luck on your recovery.
BTDTABTTS. It's been about 1.5 years for me since I had my bypass.
God bless.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Richards,
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:37:19 -, Crispin Hugo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Really weird today. Yesterday checked everything twice , three times and all
looked ok. Tried again this morning, still no joy. Just after your message
Mark, I decided to re-boot all systems in sysplex. Now its reporting
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:54:31 -0400, Knutson, Sam wrote:
At the time change here an anomaly occurred in RMF.
I opened a PMR on this but we have only the WTO message which occurred
on every system in the Sysplex when the ETR changed the time.
(snip)
It would be useful if someone else also had
Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:22:07 -0400, Tom Russell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to restrict jobs from running it a particular job
class?
Is
there
more than one way and if so, what is the easiest? TIA
I did
Hi John,
You *may* actually save some CPU with regards to other system related
overhead associated with this upgrade. Check the MXG archives under subject
Master for a thread in which a few Users are experiencing less CPU with regards
to Master and RSM upgrades when migrating to z/OS 1.9.
G'day,
I have a problem that I hope someone has come across before and has or knows
of a utility to program that will help me out.
I have a corrupt IMS Referral library and it seems to have been corrupted
for a long time. I have no good back ups of it. It has over 14,000 members
and looking at
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:42:42 -0500, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Our procedures say RMF III (RMFGAT) has to be recycled for a time change
(either backwards or forwards). This was from past experience and was
also documented in the Redbook S/390 Time Management and IBM 9037
Sysplex
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:44:14 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
Wish I could get that kind of service from Sun/STK! :-)
(just kidding)
Sometimes, so do I. (Shoemakers' children aphorism and all.)
We're in a corporate transition, moving perhaps too slowly.
Inevitably, there are bumps in the road.
Got the same thing here, on all 3 LPARs. z/OS 1.7, 3 monoplexes, 2 on STP, 1
manual timezone change.
Knutson, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/13/2008 9:54 PM
At the time change here an anomaly occurred in RMF.
I opened a PMR on this but we have only the WTO message which occurred on every
system in
Hi Mark,
We recycled last year because of OA19062 but having the PTFs applied did
not include a recycle of RMF in our procedures this year. I don't know
when it changed but it has been a while I thought.
APAR Identifier .. OA19062 Last Changed 07/02/02
RMF MONITOR I OR RMF
To be precise, it appears that the savings are actually as a result of RSM
modifications in z/OS 1.8, carried forward, not z/OS 1.9. Sorry bout that.
Patrick Falcone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi John,
You *may* actually save some CPU with regards to other system related overhead
associated
Stocker, Herman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.cendant.org...
G'day,
I have a problem that I hope someone has come across before and has or
knows
of a utility to program that will help me out.
I have a corrupt IMS Referral library and it seems to have been
That is great to hear! And I love the way you introduced your status. :)
Real mainframer.
I know JR will appreciate hearing the good news. I keep her abreast of the
health and goings on of forum members and she has not liked the news
these past few years. :( Too many fallen comrades and she
LOL!
Not sure PERF=MAX is attainable, but it is always good to set somewhat
aggressive goals.
Thanks to you, Jon, Dean, John, Bob, Mark, Fred (and just recently, Gary) for
the humor, kind words, etc.
Hey, if I have missed thanking you, just chalk it up to the prescription
strength Percocet
Maybe PERF=MAX is not attainable at this moment. But with a proper WLM
configuration, it will eventually [percolate its way up.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Richards, Robert B.
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 11:05 AM
To:
Jack, yes this is serverpac. This is an order that is already installed and
completed. I'd like to go back in and look at what jobs were run. It appears
that serverpac thinks that some of the volumes are over allocated and will not
allow you to select 'Installation' option. When I go into 'M'
Check me on this, please. I split out the TN3270 server from the TCPIP
address space a month or two ago, and now I have a need to modify it.
I'd like to do that on-the-fly, and the IP Configuration Guide suggests
that I can.
My concern is that there is no such thing as:
V
Since you are now running a second stack you will need to enter the
command with the stack name:
V TCPIP,TCPIP(this is the STC),obeyfile,flat.file.name
Pat Mihalec
Rush University Medical Center
Senior System Programmer
(312) 942-8386
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
I think this is what you need:
V TCPIP,tn3270procname,O,dsname
If you omit the TN3270 procname, TCPIP won't like it and you could get
syntax errors and this message:
EZZ0209I TELNET SERVER CONFIGURATION STATEMENTS IGNORED IN TCPIP
Luke
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
I did it by using V TCPIP,TN3270,OBEYFILE,MY.PARMLIB(MEMBER)
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pat Mihalec
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 11:47 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: TN3270 server
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 10:50 -0500, [several helpful people] wrote:
V TCPIP,tn3270procname,O,dsname
Easy Margie, works as advertised. Thanks all!
--
David Andrews
A. Duda and Sons, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For IBM-MAIN
Hi, Jack.
I ran into the same thing. Just blank out everything except the volser
on the Physical Allocations page, and ServerPac will go take a look at the
volume. You'll be fine.
Cheers,,,Steve
Steve Conway
Lead Systems Programmer
Information Systems Services Division
Computer Network
Whoops, should have been sent to Matt. Sorry.
Steve Conway
Lead Systems Programmer
Information Systems Services Division
Computer Network Operations
Phone: (703) 450-3156
Fax:(703) 450-3197
Steven Conway/HQ/FHLMC
03/14/2008 12:15 PM
To
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
If they check for a non-zero return value from BPX1SDD, then this would
be the expected behaviour when the required setting was already in
effect. A return value of -1 from BPX1SDD is a bad result.
BPX1SDD is supposed to return the previous dub setting so, if the
previous call to BPX1SDD was
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 1:36 AM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Timothy
Sipples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-snip-
It also should allow you to do
some interesting new things, like use spare CP capacity more easily to
supplement IFL capacity on demand. I guess you could say that the IFLs
become
On 14 Mar 2008 06:28:28 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Russell) wrote:
Is there a way to restrict jobs from running it a
particular job class?
Is
there
more than one way and if so, what is the easiest? TIA
I did this with IEFUJI, as
---snip--
I have a problem that I hope someone has come across before and has or knows
of a utility to program that will help me out.
I have a corrupt IMS Referral library and it seems to have been corrupted
for a long time. I have no good back ups of it.
Chase, John wrote:
We are just about to start the migration from z/OS 1.7 to z/OS 1.9.
Would someone provide a ballpark percentage increase in the amount of
CPU resources between the two releases so we can estimate the monthly
increase in our z/OS base monthly billing?
I believe IBM
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:51:56 -0700, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chase, John wrote:
We are just about to start the migration from z/OS 1.7 to z/OS 1.9.
Would someone provide a ballpark percentage increase in the amount of
CPU resources between the two releases so we can estimate the
Rich Fotchman of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
wrote on 03/14/2008 11:49:14 AM:
---snip--
I have a problem that I hope someone has come across before and has or
knows
of a utility to program that will help me out.
I have a
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:51:56 -0700, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe IBM currently uses an unofficial goal of a 5% decrease in
utilization per release.
Doesn't that conflict with the goals of the hardware sales people? ;-)
Seriously, that's the first
The z390 v1.4.01 release is now available for download from www.z390.org
with 11 new ASSIST and 226 new z10 instructions. For details and download
link for Windows XP/Vista and Linux visit:
http://z390.sourceforge.net/z390_Download_Archive.htm
Highlights of this release include:
1.
We use MVS Solutions Thruput Manager for this, to great effect. But
it's not free, just well worth the price provided you have use for its
functionality.
Gary Diehl
MVS Support
The glass is neither half full or half empty; the engineer who designed
the glass simply allowed for a 100% increase
I believe IBM currently uses an unofficial goal of a 5% decrease in
utilization per release.
Actually, it's simpler than that.
IBM used to promise it would not cost more for the same functionality in each
subsequent release.
Mind you, if you exploit new technology all bets are off.
(0.95)**N
Bob,
As others have said, welcome back. You've certainly been getting my
prayers. Now I'll add no coughing. Also, remind Rebecca that tickling
is not allowed. :-)
Tom Kelman
Commerce Bank of Kansas City
(816) 760-7632
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
If you just want to look at the jobs that were run, you can browse the
SCPPOENU dataset directly.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Dazzo
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 8:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Custompac
Jack, yes this is serverpac. This is an order that is already
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
I believe IBM currently uses an unofficial goal of a 5% decrease in utilization
per release.
Actually, it's simpler than that.
IBM used to promise it would not cost more for the same functionality in each
subsequent release.
Mind you, if you exploit new technology all
The new instructions on the z10 are interesting and offer some
opportunities for improvement. We are still experimenting. There have
been some surprises but that's what makes this job fun.
John Reda
Syncsort, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL
I've had the occasional text deck get dropped into a load library. Usually
you don't see that error until you try to copy the library. Fortunately we
were able to find the offending member(s) and delete them. Then everything
went back to normal.
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:28:35 -0500, Dave
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:25:40 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe IBM currently uses an unofficial goal of a 5% decrease in
utilization per release.
Actually, it's simpler than that.
IBM used to promise it would not cost more for the same functionality in
each subsequent
- Original Message -
From: Stocker, Herman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 10:26 AM
Subject: Any Utility that will allow correction of a corroupt library
G'day,
I have a problem that I hope someone has come across before and has or
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:30:58 -0500, Kelman, Tom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob,
As others have said, welcome back. You've certainly been getting my
prayers. Now I'll add no coughing. Also, remind Rebecca that tickling
is not allowed. :-)
From what Rebecca told me, I think she needs to remind
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:49:14 -0500, Rick Fochtman wrote:
I have a problem that I hope someone has come across before and has or
knows
of a utility to program that will help me out.
I have a corrupt IMS Referral library and it seems to have been corrupted
for a long time. I have no good back
Thanks for the help.
I think it was corrupted with a compress share operation or two people/jobs
doing a copy. this could of happened any number of times since there are so
many members that have been damaged.
I am not able to compress or copy it. I am having trouble using superc to
locate the
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:39:28 -0700, Schwarz, Barry A
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you just want to look at the jobs that were run, you can browse the
SCPPOENU dataset directly.
Only if you take overt action to get them in there (using the O / output
command).
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr.
Thanks Steve, I don't understand why but it worked.
Steven Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/14/2008 12:15 PM
Hi, Jack.
I ran into the same thing. Just blank out everything except the volser
on the Physical Allocations page, and ServerPac will go take a look at the
volume. You'll be fine.
True, but if that wasn't done you won't see much besides the job number
when you do get the dialogue to let you look. You won't know if the job
succeeded or even if it ran.
You could also review the JCL but you won't know if what you are looking
at is what was actually submitted.
-Original
Bad news, good news here. First the bad, for the IMS referral library, the
library (along with IMS.FORMAT) is supposed to be updated by the MFSUTL
process, not IEBCOPY. IMS.REFERAL is also used as input to MFSUTL process
for verification that all device type formats are being created/changed
I am trying to give a user access to the SDSF LOG display command and I am
having trouble doing so.
I have added the LOG keyword to the AUTH part of his ISPFPARM member but
try as I mite I can't get it to show up on his SDSF menu.
Now this user is just a user and not a sysprog or any thing like
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:08:29 -0700, Schwarz, Barry A
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True, but if that wasn't done you won't see much besides the job number
when you do get the dialogue to let you look. You won't know if the job
succeeded or even if it ran.
You could also review the JCL but you won't
Did you refresh SDSF?
Daniel McLaughlin
Z-Series Systems Programmer
Information Communications Technology
Crawford Company
4680 N. Royal Atlanta
Tucker GA 30084
phone: 770-621-3256
fax: 770-621-3237
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.crawfordandcompany.com
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/13/2008
at 05:25 PM, Dave Kopischke [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
By virtue of the fact that disclaimer is in the E-Mail, a lawyer might
construe that as a reason to haul you in to court to explain why you
disseminated that information. At this point, you're dealing
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
03/13/2008
at 06:28 PM, Thompson, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
And to that end, I agree. People need to cut the junk off a posting, only
quoting what is germane to their comments.
Yes. And other people need to stop jumping on people for doing as you ask.
--
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/13/2008
at 11:06 PM, John S. Giltner, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Linux will run under both CP's and IFL's, both on bare metal or under
z/VM.
On a bare LPAR, but not on bare metal; basic mode is long gone.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
I'd like to see that, because I recall reading parallel sysplex test reports
that showed an increase.
I'll hunt for the reference, but I'm not sure what you mean.
SYSPLEX overhead goes up, or overhead goes up because you implemented SYSPLEX?
The second is obvious.
-
Too busy driving to stop for
This has nothing to do with anything said in the 1990s. It is a much more
recent initiative that has been articulated verbally to ISVs,
customers at at SHARE, and in other places. It is not a formal promise to
anyone. It is an internal objective. So far, it's working.
Possibly.
But, 5%/release
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:53:44 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to see that, because I recall reading parallel sysplex test
reports that showed an increase.
I'll hunt for the reference, but I'm not sure what you mean.
SYSPLEX overhead goes up, or overhead goes up because you
Am modifying IEFACTRT and want to suppress the output to my hardcopy
SYSLOG. I can't remember the JES2 commands that displays the destinations
of the ROUTCDEs and which command will change the routcde's. Thanks
John Norgauer
University of California Davis Medical Center
2315 Stockton Blvd
ASB
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:46:35 -0700, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...snipped...
This has nothing to do with anything said in the 1990s. It is a much
more recent initiative that has been articulated verbally to ISVs,
customers at at SHARE, and in other places. It is not a formal promise
to
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:40:36 -0500, Walt Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:46:35 -0700, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...snipped...
This has nothing to do with anything said in the 1990s. It is a much
more recent initiative that has been articulated verbally to
On 14 Mar 2008 09:25:06 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
On 14 Mar 2008 06:28:28 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Russell) wrote:
Is there a way to restrict jobs from running it a
particular job class?
Is
there
more than one way
It was a wonderful video, and I've asked the powers that be at IBM to make
it available on their website. I'll post it here if they allow it.
Cheryl
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Corneel Booysen
Sent: Monday, March 03,
John,
Marianne Hammer of IBM gave an excellent SHARE presentation that showed the
changes between releases. Go to www.share.org, click on Orlando Proceedings
to the left, then search for session #2530. There is first a section about
going from z/OS 1.7 to 1.8, where the goal had changed from
Skip this if off-subject stuff irritates you...just some Friday war stories.
Speaking of vibration testing...I remember back sometime in the 1970's we
had an intermittent storage director.
After a few SEV1 failures IBM would auto-escalate the support issue to page
somebody
and another guy in
Speaking of vibration testing...I remember back sometime in the 1970's we had
an intermittent storage director.
We had a bunch of Amdahl 6280's that had a problem with a string of some
metallic substance that would grow (as a crystal) from the nameplate down to
the platter.
If it touched the
87 matches
Mail list logo
