Re: MB to Cyl Conversion

2006-12-18 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 10:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: MB to Cyl Conversion SNIP Since we're talking about DASD space, shouldn't those factors be 1000, as

Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones

2006-12-18 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 10:49 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:52:45 -0500, Shmuel Metz

Re: Plurals and language confusion

2006-12-18 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 2:39 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Plurals and language confusion -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf

Re: Plurals and language confusion

2006-12-18 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clark Morris Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 5:15 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Plurals and language confusion SNIP Many blind people are in a passenger seat or walk around the car to

IPCS ASID

2006-12-15 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
I'm working on a little problem. I have an SVCDUMP that contains more than one address space. I have a LARGE exec library for diagnosing various things. The problem is, I just can't seem to establish the ASID to be used for addresses, C/Bs, etc. Would anyone have a quick hint on how to

Re: S0C1 with ILC 6

2006-12-14 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gibney, Dave Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 3:15 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: S0C1 with ILC 6 snip You can get a S0C1 (PIC 1) with ILC 6 if the prior instruction that executed

Re: Decimal FP (was: vendor JCL)

2006-12-13 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 3:26 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Decimal FP (was: vendor JCL) Simultaneous Peripheral Operations On Line. I know that's what IBM says

Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones

2006-12-12 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McKown, John Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 7:48 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones SNIP I think trying to argue that IBM is a monopoly by

Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones

2006-12-12 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Marchant Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 8:29 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:55:44 -0500, Thompson, Steve (SCI

Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones

2006-12-12 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D. Smith Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 3:46 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones SNIP Trade secrets are exactly what the name says.

Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones

2006-12-12 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Shannon Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 5:05 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones How about LLA? It was implemented on at least 1 S/370-158

Re: D U command for DASD

2006-12-08 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 10:41 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: D U command for DASD Hello, Can anyone help me out with the command syntax for what I think is a D U

Re: OUTLIM aborts

2006-12-08 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 10:55 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: OUTLIM aborts I have a proc where I wish to override an output: =20 //TEBC#1.REPORT2 DD

Re: D U command for DASD

2006-12-08 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thompson, Steve (SCI TW) Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 11:00 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: D U command for DASD snip Would you actually be needing the IODF data via HCD? Later

Re: How recover from unrecoverable DCB ABEND?

2006-12-08 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 4:38 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: How recover from unrecoverable DCB ABEND? Yes. Charles snip Off the top of my head, you may have to

Re: [OT] Merry xmas Chanukah

2006-12-07 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 5:39 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [OT] Merry xmas Chanukah Galambos, Robert wrote: You forgot one language! 'Sign Language' ...

Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones

2006-12-07 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 10:39 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones SNIP Companies threaten each other all the time.

Re: Get around Double tape marks?

2006-12-07 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy White Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 11:18 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Get around Double tape marks? I tried BLP didn't make a difference with Ditto it still honored the

Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones

2006-12-06 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 2:31 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 21:06:53 -0600, Phil Sidler

Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones

2006-12-05 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nigel Hadfield Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 12:57 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM sues maker of Intel-based Mainframe clones It's difficult to see why they are suing, especially

Re: MB to Cyl Conversion

2006-12-04 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 2:12 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: MB to Cyl Conversion Thompson, Steve , SCI TW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL

Re: IBMLink and EOS for z/OS 1.4

2006-12-04 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 2:20 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: IBMLink and EOS for z/OS 1.4 snip Would anyone know if IBMLink will answer and ETR if it isn't

Re: MB to Cyl Conversion

2006-12-01 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 9:35 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: MB to Cyl Conversion snip Well, now you hit a topic on the head, that I, as non-English, never

Re: Cancelling a job/tso user in a 100% CPU situation.

2006-12-01 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McKown, John Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 10:50 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Cancelling a job/tso user in a 100% CPU situation. This has come up here. We are in month-end. Our CPU

Re: ISPF PF Key Mapping

2006-11-30 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stocker, Herman Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 10:30 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: ISPF PF Key Mapping The keylist that controls HELP are ISPHELP, ISPHLP2 ISPKYLST. If you change

Re: ISPF PF Key Mapping

2006-11-30 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 11:14 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: ISPF PF Key Mapping snip Does someone have a list of various places that we need to go to to change a

Re: ISPF PF Key Mapping

2006-11-30 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 11:27 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: ISPF PF Key Mapping On 30 Nov 2006 08:51:58 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thompson, Steve , SCI TW

Re: ISPF PF Key Mapping

2006-11-30 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Comstock Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 1:37 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: ISPF PF Key Mapping snip Under help / tutorial the function key assignments are generally these:

Re: MB to Cyl Conversion

2006-11-30 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 5:15 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: MB to Cyl Conversion SAY 'THE NUMBER OF TRACKS IS' TRK UGH! Where's your grammar? Home. Baking cookies

Re: IBMLink Internet access out to lunch again?

2006-11-28 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Black Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 9:50 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBMLink Internet access out to lunch again? I called the IBMLINK 800 number and got put thru to some

Re: [SPAM] DFDSS - DISASTER RECOVERY (RESTORE) QUESTION.

2006-11-27 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Dawes Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 8:46 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: [SPAM] DFDSS - DISASTER RECOVERY (RESTORE) QUESTION. snip Is there anything else I should include?

Re: [SPAM] DFDSS - DISASTER RECOVERY (RESTORE) QUESTION.

2006-11-27 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 12:08 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [SPAM] DFDSS - DISASTER RECOVERY (RESTORE) QUESTION. Crystal ball option? Steve,

Re: Where can you get a Minor in Mainframe?

2006-11-17 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Seubert Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 11:36 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Where can you get a Minor in Mainframe? snip Take a look here:

Re: Where can you get a Minor in Mainframe?

2006-11-17 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel A. McLaughlin Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 1:35 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Where can you get a Minor in Mainframe? Would my 17 year old child, who works on mainframes be a

Re: Where can you get a Minor in Mainframe?

2006-11-17 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Arnett Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 3:29 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Where can you get a Minor in Mainframe? What ever happened to the Virtual Universe Operating System that

Re: Inflating Severity

2006-11-15 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Simpson Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 7:38 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Inflating Severity snip In one recent memorable case, the local rep actually called the support

Re: link to a real, working IBMLINK ?

2006-11-14 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel A. McLaughlin Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 7:48 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: link to a real, working IBMLINK ? I've been in and out of the manuals area several times today

Re: link to a real, working IBMLINK ?

2006-11-14 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Justice Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 7:27 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: link to a real, working IBMLINK ? Okay, so does anyone have a link to IBMLINK that is actually working

IBMLINK Failures -- Attention of IBM Management

2006-11-14 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
Suppose that for every time one needs to open an ETR, and IBMLINK is down, that you were to call the 800 number and make your problem a SEV1. Now further suppose that all IBM customers were to do this. How long would it take before the pain would be felt high enough that this would get fixed -

Re: IBMLINK Failures -- Attention of IBM Management

2006-11-14 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 11:41 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBMLINK Failures -- Attention of IBM Management snip As a discussion point, I'm not sure how

Re: IBMLINK Failures -- Attention of IBM Management

2006-11-14 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel A. McLaughlin Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 1:52 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBMLINK Failures -- Attention of IBM Management Nope, not the man behind the curtain. Think

Re: IBMLINK Failures -- Attention of IBM Management

2006-11-14 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 3:12 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBMLINK Failures -- Attention of IBM Management snip I see 2 problems with this. snip You may get

Re: Assembler question

2006-11-13 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clark Morris Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 4:47 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Assembler question On 7 Nov 2006 10:34:33 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: snip Back in the

Re: Assembler question

2006-11-07 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Tsujimoto Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 9:15 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Assembler question Is *discontinuity in assembler design* a nice way of saying, it's a bad

Re: The PSI Letter V4

2006-11-06 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nigel Hadfield Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 11:47 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: The PSI Letter V4 snip ISTR there was a perception at that time that IBM could not legally refuse

Re: CA CEO in the slammer

2006-11-02 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil Payne Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 12:58 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: CA CEO in the slammer Well, not yet. Many a slip twixt cup and lip:

Re: Comparison of TN3270 Clients

2006-10-31 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Andrews Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 9:33 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Comparison of TN3270 Clients snip (By the way, does anybody else find Microsoft's use of the word Vista

Re: SMF JWT

2006-10-30 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NAIDOO Raleigh (AXA-Tech-AU) Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 4:25 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: SMF JWT 1. The SMF JWT parm specifies the maximum amount of time that a job or TSO/E user

Re: SHARE in Tampa Florida, February 11-16, 2007

2006-10-26 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex R. Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 12:33 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SHARE in Tampa Florida, February 11-16, 2007 snip Daniel McLaughlin of the IBM Mainframe

REFR -- Real Intent v. Actual Use?

2006-10-25 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
I thought I'd get away from the original topic title. REFR as an attribute, does this also imply that the code is self-relocating so that if the code is reloaded at a different place, it is still able to continue execution (of the task in flight)? So PRE DAT days, this would be an overlay type

Re: Why would Rexx Date/Time be different from ASCBEWST Date/Time?

2006-10-25 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lindy Mayfield Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 9:47 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Why would Rexx Date/Time be different from ASCBEWST Date/Time? Would anyone have an idea as to what

Re: Why would Rexx Date/Time be different from ASCBEWST Date/Time?

2006-10-25 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lindy Mayfield Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:53 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Why would Rexx Date/Time be different from ASCBEWST Date/Time? Very good point, Paul, thanks. That

Re: Resume cover letters.

2006-10-20 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 9:20 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Resume cover letters. snip So what would *you* name a bank? snip Nobody Cares, Nobody Bothers (NCNB,

Re: Quick I hope COBOL question

2006-10-19 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clark Morris Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 6:17 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Quick I hope COBOL question On 9 Oct 2006 14:24:46 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: I know

Re: Software Pricing

2006-10-18 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 1:17 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Software Pricing You'd think IT was the name of a new religion instead of a business expense.) Do the

Re: Linkage Editor

2006-09-29 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Zelden Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 2:42 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Linkage Editor On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:28:28 -0500, Mark Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks to all.

Re: 2007 DST Changes

2006-09-26 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 3:35 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: 2007 DST Changes snip Alas, UNIX doesn't do leap seconds; forbidden by POSIX; always uses UTC.

Re: Wars and Allies (was: The Fate of VM)

2006-09-22 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John H. Lang Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 1:24 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Wars and Allies (was: The Fate of VM) These days, most war (and lots of other evil) is perpetrated by

Re: SMP/E

2006-09-21 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 12:17 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SMP/E Gibney, Dave wrote: Ok, I couldn't read such granularity in the syntax. It seemed all or

Re: SDSF Question

2006-09-21 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Zelden Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 4:31 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SDSF Question snip I prefer to hit enter as fast as I can in the DA screen to chew up as many CPU

Re: Zos 1.7 Exits

2006-09-19 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nir Eliyaho Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 10:53 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Zos 1.7 Exits Hi List. We are migrating from Zos 1.4 to Zos 1.7 and now we have encountered the jes2

Re: ICKDSF ERASE VOLUME Too Slow

2006-09-19 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark House Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 3:48 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: ICKDSF ERASE VOLUME Too Slow I am looking for a fast way to erase (DESTROY) all of the data on a 3390-3

Re: Sun DTrace

2006-09-15 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Black Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 1:02 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Sun DTrace snip Can you say z/OS System Trace and SLIP? snip And Voila! a patent for this will be

Re: Non-SMP/e packaging

2006-09-14 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Cole Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 8:20 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Non-SMP/e packaging snip Incorrectly? Broken? Marketing gimmick? Strawman excuse? [sigh] snip Religion

Re: SHARE attendance

2006-09-14 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert A. Rosenberg Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 4:26 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SHARE attendance snip Tom might be a fan of Piers Anthony's Xanth Fantasy series where in the

Re: IDCAMS and DF/SORT support for LBI

2006-09-14 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Schmidt Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 5:22 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IDCAMS and DF/SORT support for LBI snip LBI is limited to tapes, not DASD. (Too bad - I would like to

Re: Non-SMP/e packaging

2006-09-13 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Cole Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 1:17 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Non-SMP/e packaging snip For our product doing a RESTORE (and REJECT) is a trivial inconvenience. Our

Re: Non-SMP/e packaging

2006-09-13 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Cole Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 2:10 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Non-SMP/e packaging snip The only thing I have against clutches is that it's hard to hold, uh, hands

Re: Non-SMP/e packaging

2006-09-12 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Russell Witt Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 11:13 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Non-SMP/e packaging I had a request from a client today, asking when CA-1 would stop being delivered in

Re: Non-SMP/e packaging

2006-09-12 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Andrews Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 10:16 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Non-SMP/e packaging snip Of course, this would be an effort *much* larger than simply providing

Re: Question : VTOC size - JES2 Volume

2006-09-12 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of willie bunter Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 11:11 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Question : VTOC size - JES2 Volume Can anybody please correct me if I am wrong. I have to init a volume

Re: Another BIG Mainframe Bites the Dust

2006-09-08 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Veilleux, Jon L Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 7:17 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: FW: Another BIG Mainframe Bites the Dust REXX is the gold standard for decimal arithemtic but since it

Re: FW: Fatuities (was 'Another BIG mainframe . . . ')

2006-09-08 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 9:54 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: FW: Fatuities (was 'Another BIG mainframe . . . ') snip Jon, I think z/OS sysprogs should continue

Re: FW: Fatuities (was 'Another BIG mainframe . . . ')

2006-09-08 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Andrews Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 11:14 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: FW: Fatuities (was 'Another BIG mainframe . . . ') On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 11:32 -0400, Thompson, Steve

Re: Move VSAM DS w/ 8 Components or more

2006-09-08 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark House Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 5:38 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Move VSAM DS w/ 8 Components or more snip 1. Is there a way to get a list of VSAM data set names by CLUSTER

Re: KOREAN INSURER RETIRES 7,000 MIPS MAINFRAMES

2006-09-07 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McKown, John Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 9:06 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: KOREAN INSURER RETIRES 7,000 MIPS MAINFRAMES snip Now, having said that, it might be possible to

Re: Another BIG Mainframe Bites the Dust

2006-09-06 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kirk Talman Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 3:05 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Another BIG Mainframe Bites the Dust running nix servers w/o admins. that's an interesting thought.

Re: IBM announces Encrypting tape drives

2006-09-01 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Black Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 3:04 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM announces Encrypting tape drives Now with encrypted tape drives, how many DR vendors will have

Re: IBM's rights (was Head's Up - zIIP issue OA17458/UA28419)

2006-08-29 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Relson Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 8:44 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM's rights (was Head's Up - zIIP issue OA17458/UA28419) snipage Perhaps you might want to re-think your

Re: IBM's rights (was Head's Up - zIIP issue OA17458/UA28419)

2006-08-29 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Relson Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 8:44 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM's rights (was Head's Up - zIIP issue OA17458/UA28419) But back to STL days for me: One of the

Re: What part of z/OS is the OS?

2006-08-29 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of john gilmore Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 2:12 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: What part of z/OS is the OS? snip There was consensus only about the usual operational definition,

Re: HLASM Macro Call Question

2006-08-28 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
John: The problem with AINSERT from what I currently understand (and we need to take this to the ASM LIST, which I will complete doing this evening), the card image must be built so that you have a non-blank that will show up in CC72. Otherwise all your data that will be substituted will get

Re: New airline security measures in Europe

2006-08-28 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anne Lynn Wheeler Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 5:44 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: New airline security measures in Europe snip i think there was the vehicle plowing into the lobby

Re: IBM's rights (was Head's Up - zIIP issue OA17458/UA28419)

2006-08-28 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Relson Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 7:08 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: IBM's rights (was Head's Up - zIIP issue OA17458/UA28419) snip Roland's technique is very reasonable

Re: SLIP trap for wild branch?

2006-08-28 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thompson, Steve (SCI TW) Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 10:37 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SLIP trap for wild branch? snipage different libraries concatenated in front of the ISV

Re: SLIP trap for wild branch?

2006-08-28 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 12:20 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SLIP trap for wild branch? snip Might be worth a shot. I initially dismissed this as a possibility

Re: What part of z/OS is the OS?

2006-08-28 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lindy Mayfield Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 2:05 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: What part of z/OS is the OS? Thanks Alan. I realized that coming up with a definition of what is an

Re: JCL - Copy Tape

2006-08-28 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.S. Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 2:47 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: JCL - Copy Tape Thompson, Steve (SCI TW) wrote: How did this tape get created? Was it created on a VSE system

ISV Anchor Table

2006-08-25 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
Does anyone know anything about this? A table that is pointed to off the CVT/ECVT that contains pointers for ISVs to anchor things? I'd heard something about this in the mid-90s and I've drunk a few beers since then. Later, Steve Thompson

Re: ISV Anchor Table

2006-08-25 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
Thanx to all who answered this. I'm having a Senior Week. Ok, since I originally did work with this when it was first announced I've had a few beers to drink. And I just couldn't remember clearly. [And they want to blame it on us guys/gals being older than 40!] Later, Steve Thompson

Re: VSAM CLOSE failure problem

2006-08-25 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 3:13 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: VSAM CLOSE failure problem I'm running an asm recovery routine that closes several VSAM files. 3 of the files close

Re: SLIP trap for wild branch?

2006-08-25 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 3:21 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: SLIP trap for wild branch? Hi, All, Got a CICS application program that branches out of itself (stays in the

Re: HLASM Macro Call Question

2006-08-24 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 7:10 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: HLASM Macro Call Question snip You need to provide a bit more context. Please do a cut

Re: HLASM macro call question

2006-08-24 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of john gilmore Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 9:30 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: HLASM macro call question SNIP Seymour's contrary view noted, this thread nevertheless belongs on and

Re: HLASM macro call question

2006-08-24 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Mullins Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 10:35 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: HLASM macro call question MNOTE 'Send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' MNOTE 'SUBSCRIBE

Re: really stupid question - z/OS 1.6 and CSTOR 2Gb

2006-08-23 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Marchant Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 9:19 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: really stupid question - z/OS 1.6 and CSTOR 2Gb On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:34:11 -0500, McKown, John

Re: DASD Response Time

2006-08-23 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Day Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 2:27 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: DASD Response Time I'm developing some code on a Flex-es machine and would like to try to see how the code

HLASM Macro Call Question

2006-08-23 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
I need a bit of IEBEYEBALL by some of you heavy weight MACRO writers. I've been working on a set of macros for about 4 days and now I'm just too close to the bark to see the tree. Specifically, I have been working on a tool for handling an issue and ran into this problem. Now I remember that

Re: 27x132?

2006-08-22 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
I have forgotten: is MOD 1 12x40? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Andrews Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 3:07 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: 27x132? snip Surprise! Our shipping people use several Intermec

Re: 27x132?

2006-08-22 Thread Thompson, Steve (SCI TW)
We had some IBM terminal of some kind back in the '70s when I was in college (second attempt). It was 12 lines and 40 char across and we used ACTS to access it (Ambassador College Terminal System). I can't tell you how much I enjoyed BTAM and TCAM. So I was wondering if those were the MOD1 types

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >