apologize if you have already received the email on this, but Syzygy is
announcing our BETA testing of the next version of SyzAUTO.
You should appologise for sending this e-mail at all!
IBM-Main is a user discussion forum.
Not a place to receive e-mail advertisements from software vendors.
-
John Benik wrote:
If you find any training we would also be interested.
Course ES210 in IBM.
I did teach it once or twice.
IMHO it's not the best, but the only one I know. g
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl
Sd Rejonowy dla
Hi
Does the message *IEE806A COMMANDS EXCEED LIMIT IN COMMAND CLASS M3 can
cause system to halt ?
JAcky
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jacky Bright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mar 6, 2008 3:31 PM
Subject: Production Mainframe Issue - Urgent
To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Mark,
Thank you for the correction.
However it's *new* information. I just checked z/OS 1.7 version of the
manual - no mention about FCTC. Does it mean FCTC is not supported on
1.7 or just undocumented ? I don't know. I checked summary of changes -
no mention about FCTC.
BTW: It remained
Does the message *IEE806A COMMANDS EXCEED LIMIT IN COMMAND CLASS M3 can
cause system to halt ?
No. Commands do not get executed anymore until the 100 queued commands are
executed.
Use the CMDS command to display the command that are hung and check *why* they
are hung. This command was
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 13:54:36 -0500, Mark Pace wrote:
From z/OS 1.9 MVS:Planning Global Resource Serialization.
These links can be either a data link in a parallel CTC adapter. In ring
mode, link or CTC link means either an IBM 3088 data link, a parallel
CTC adapter, or an ESCON(R) channel
And z/OS 1.4 has been out of support for a while unless you're paying through
the nose for continued support as we were. Are you in 31 or 64? We had a
problem, in a simple monoplex, going from 31 to 64 in z/OS 1.4 with a 3rd party
product doing some nasty things in storage.
Bu Dante [EMAIL
Even IBM support still believes that. When sent a AskQ they replied that I
needed to change the IOdevices to BCTC. :-(
I've replied with the excerpt from the book. I'm waiting to see what they
say today.
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Zaromil Tisler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 6 Mar
He should be honored ! :)
Thomas
_
Thomas Berg Specialist IT Utveckling Swedbank AB (Publ)
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Bob Rutledge
Skickat: den 6
Morning, All.
Trying to get into Resource Link to check HIPER MCL J11212.156 for the
2064. I keep timing out on the connection.
Here's the address I've been using:
http://www-01.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc03100.nsf?OpenDatabase.
There's probably a simpler one, but this is what I have
Anyone else unable to access or is it just me?
Thanks,
Cal
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Not just you, Cal.
Steve Conway
Lead Systems Programmer
Information Systems Services Division
Computer Network Operations
Phone: (703) 450-3156
Fax:(703) 450-3197
Cal McCracken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
03/07/2008 08:51
I have a multi-file tape that is a mix of both SL and SUL labels. When I
inquire on the volume or individual datasets using the RMM panels or
reports that use the CDS records I always get whatever the first file on
the physical tape happens to be. According to IBM there is no field that
contains
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter Relson
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 6:45 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is PSATOLD always zero when in SRB mode?
The answer is yes.
But you might want to ask the converse
You will not be able to bring across your JES spool you will have to
offload then reload to your new spool. To fall back you would have to have
dups of your 3rd party data sets because I am sure you will have
recompile/reassemble some modules.You will not be able to use the same TSO
profs on a
Dennis,
I have direct experience with CA1, TLMS, RMM, Control-T and Zara. All 5
of these tape management systems do this the same way. The label type
is associated with the volume and not the dataset. There seems to be an
assumption by the TMS vendors that there will not be a mix of label
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 08:44:57 -0600, Michael Saraco
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You will not be able to bring across your JES spool you will have to
offload then reload to your new spool.
Why? As long as they have done an $ACTIVATE to Z2 mode (which is the
z/OS 1.2 level) there is no reason they
Can anyone besides me see a need for this especially now with tapes
getting larger and larger? We are getting to the point of everything
being stacked and label information of each individual file is not
always the same.
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
I had sysprog friend at another company that tried going from 1.4 to 1.8
and JES would come up on the old spool and he said that he had done the
$ACTIVATE to Z2 mode.
Michael Saraco
From:
Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Date:
03/07/2008 09:16 AM
Subject:
Re: upgrading
On 3/7/08, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO it's not the best, but the only one I know. g
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl
Doesn't that make it the best (and worst) :-)
Jim McAlpine
Jim McAlpine wrote:
On 3/7/08, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] SNIP IT wrote:
IMHO it's not the best, but the only one I know. g
[...]
Doesn't that make it the best (and worst) :-)
OK, it was unclear. ;-)
I mean, it it not the best of mainframe courses, not only RMM-related.
Some courses in IBM
We execute many FTP transmissions from z/OS V1R7 outbound to our AIX
boxes.
From time to time we have FTP failures; 1% of the total.
However this 1% is in a VERY visible system and receives a lot of
attention.
A rerun a few minutes later is successful.
So, the question is, might we setup some
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 09:48:28 -0600, Michael Saraco
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had sysprog friend at another company that tried going from 1.4 to 1.8
and JES would come up on the old spool and he said that he had done the
$ACTIVATE to Z2 mode.
Michael Saraco
I know there is code to prevent those
Well the book is wrong according to IBM.
*a sysplex when all systems are part of the same GRS plex, then XCF
can be used for communication between systems and it can make use
of FCTC device types.
.
Otherwise you cannot specify a FCTC device type for GRS to use as a CTC
for communication. *
Well
We had one set of users change their FTP proc so that it checked the
return code and if it was not zero to re-tried the ftp. They set the proc
up to retry up to 3 times, with a wait step in between to delay 30 seconds
before retrying.
Thanks
Bill Bishop
Specialist
Mainframe Support Group
John,
Doing a PING first will let you know if you can connect at all, but it
won't help guarantee the FTP will succeed.We have many jobs that
connect successfully to an FTP server, begin the transfer and then fail.
What we do is call a REXX which calls FTP and tests the RC. If it isn't
Edward Jaffe wrote:
Record 53521,227,000 has been submitted.
APAR Identifier .. OA24276 Last Changed 08/03/07
MISSING IOS070E DEV, MOUNT PENDING MESSAGE AT Z/OS 1.9 WHEN
ENABLED VIA PARMLIB IECIOSXX EX:MIH MOUNTMSG=YES,MNTS=03:00
The 08/03/07 date means March 7, 2008.
Greg Shirey wrote:
Doing a PING first will let you know if you can connect at all, but it
won't help guarantee the FTP will succeed.We have many jobs that
connect successfully to an FTP server, begin the transfer and then fail.
In the security-conscious IT world in which we find
Shameless plug:
SDS has a new FTP Manager product that might be of interest:
http://www.sdsusa.com/sfm/general.htm
Cal
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 03/07/2008
09:37:39 AM:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter Relson
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 6:45 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is PSATOLD
---snip---
I have a multi-file tape that is a mix of both SL and SUL labels. When I
inquire on the volume or individual datasets using the RMM panels or
reports that use the CDS records I always get whatever the first file on
the physical tape happens to be.
Already did. That's how I discovered the error. I'm using
CA-Encryption and the encrypted files are SUL but if the first file on a
stacked tape is SL then I have no way to report on that.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick
Hi, All,
An application group is doing a stress test against a CICS region,
using batched instream commands via an IEFBR14 job to invoke a user
transaction. Some of the MODIFY commands are being rejected with
message IEE342I MODIFY REJECTED-TASK BUSY. The part of the
explanation in MC that
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 11:25 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IEE342I MODIFY REJECTED-TASK BUSY
Hi, All,
An application group is doing a stress test against a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 11:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEE342I MODIFY REJECTED-TASK BUSY
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
I think you're thinking of the OS/390 Softcopy Print feature.
While BookManager books can be built from DCF source books, there are
other flavors of BookManager Build that I think can build from other
types of source material.
The OS/390 Softcopy Print feature, on the other hand, was for
JC asks
An application group is doing a stress test against a CICS region,
using batched instream commands via an IEFBR14 job to invoke a user
transaction. Some of the MODIFY commands are being rejected with
message IEE342I MODIFY REJECTED-TASK BUSY. The part of the
explanation in MC that
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 12:02:25 -0600, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, in the case of CICS, I was wrong. The manual states:
quote
If the task is to be attached, DFHZCNA obtains a TIOA and moves the data
from the CIB to the TIOA. DFHZATT is then called to attach the task. If
the attach
Dennis, Do you want to know which files are encrypted or which files use User
labels ?
...and, why do you care about user labels? What will you do differently if you
knew which had user labels?
Mike Wood RMM Development
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 11:02:45 -0600, Dennis Trojak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello all, I am looking for ideas on ways to transfer reports/sysouts from one
JES2 spool on one lpar to another lpar.
The current method I am using is to use a JES offload dataset to offload the
report(s) and then reload them on the other lpar. This works okay but I'm
looking for an
Set up an NJE link between the 2 LPARs?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gilbert Cardenas
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 1:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: [IBM-MAIN] Transfer reports from lpar to lpar
Hello all, I am
Gilbert,
Set up an NJE connection, then you can use /*ROUTE PRINT JCL.
Jimmy
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
The console handling In CICS is behaving as previously explained.
See the QEDIT Macro.
For CICS, Console Commands are handled by a component called Terminal
Control under the CSTP System Servives Task.
CSTP handles All Terminal driven activity from VTAM and Non Vtam.
I believe CSTP is invoked
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Walt Farrell
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 12:02:25 -0600, McKown, John wrote:
Well, in the case of CICS, I was wrong. The manual states:
quote
If the task is to be attached, DFHZCNA obtains a TIOA and moves the
data
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gilbert Cardenas
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 12:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Transfer reports from lpar to lpar
Hello all, I am looking for ideas on ways to transfer
Hi Gil,
I would look at using a NJE connection between the systems. You can setup
a DESTination and do it that way or issue $Route commands to get the
output over. AFAIK you can get NJE tunneled across TCP/IP these days
depending on the z/OS version.
Of course there may be some other ideas
Shared Spool?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Mike,
The encryption product we are using, (OEM), creates USER labels to
indicate encryption of the file. In order for me to report on those
datasets that are encrypted using the RMM CDS information I need the
actual LABEL type of each dataset. See my problem?
Dennis
-Original Message-
NJE works very well with TCP/IP via Enterprise Extender (VIPA) LPAR to LPAR in
z/OS 1.7.
Cheers!
JD
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob
Schramm
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 12:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
John,
You can encapsulate your ftp in a rexx program that would retry as many
times as needed in a single jcl step.
HTH,
Walter.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul D'Angelo
The console handling In CICS is behaving as previously explained.
See the QEDIT Macro.
For CICS, Console Commands are handled by a component called
Terminal Control under the CSTP System Servives
Gil,
I agree with John, NJE is the simplest and easiest to implement and control.
I have also done it too many times to count via VTAM and TCPIP..Always
usings CTC , ESCON now FICON..
Regards,
Scott Ford
IDF,
Host Developer
http://www.identityforge.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM
It's available.
Cal
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
I believe The CIB COUNTER (CIBCTR) is architecturally set by the
developers Of CICS.
But I would have some concerns if application programmerrs are able to
issue Console Commands..
Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
03/07/2008 02:47
All,
How many places have implemented tapeless backup environments? I
don't mean virtual tape that has tape on the back-end but no tape at
all. We are exploring different options and the wintel side of the house
is heading down the totally tapeless path. That makes me nervous but I'm
Sorry, forgot to mention that I have been trying to get the system progs to
setup NJE but for some reason, they are reluctant to do so and shared spool
is definitely out of the question.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Sorry, forgot to mention that I have been trying to get the system progs to
setup NJE but for some reason, they are reluctant to do so
Why?
and shared spool is definitely out of the question.
And, why?
If you have a true business need, sysprogs should not be able to stand in the
way!
-
Too
On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 14:11 -0600, Leitner, Timothy wrote:
the wintel side of the house is heading down the totally tapeless
path. That makes me nervous but I'm getting old.
A friend once told me:
You drive like an old lady!
and I replied:
How do you think they get to be old
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 20:33:38 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sorry, forgot to mention that I have been trying to get the system progs to
setup NJE but for some reason, they are reluctant to do so
Why?
and shared spool is definitely out of the question.
And, why?
If you have a true
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sorry, forgot to mention that I have been trying to get the system
progs to setup NJE but for some reason, they are reluctant to do so
Why?
and shared spool is definitely out of the question.
And,
Can anyone tell me how to copy the OMVS.ROOT from a batch job?
JL
Jason Lowe - Mainframe Systems - Cornell Information Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(607) 255-7851
The Supreme Court has surrendered.
It has destroyed the Civil Rights Bill, and converted the Republican
party into a party
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leitner, Timothy
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 2:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Tapeless backup
All,
How many places have implemented tapeless backup environments? I
In a message dated 3/7/2008 12:25:50 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
being enabled. This feature was available from OS/390 1.2 (or 1.3 maybe)
till OS/390 2.10. The residual effect is that there is still Enablement
checking which must now be used on DCF, but you no
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jason lowe
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 2:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Copying HFS file in Bacth
Can anyone tell me how to copy the OMVS.ROOT from a batch job?
JL
Everytime I bring it up, they hem haw around. Perhaps it is because they do
not know how to set it up???
I haven't been involved in setting up NJE or shared SPOOL since the early
1980's.
I would have thought everybody that needed it would be done by now.
If it doesn't require too much
I don't know for sure about that book, but yes, a lot (if not all) of the
Information Developers I know now use workstation based tools instead of
BookMaster and DCF.
Some Information Development groups don't even produce BookManager format
output but produce some books in PDF format only
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gilbert Cardenas
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 2:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Transfer reports from lpar to lpar
Everytime I bring it up, they hem haw around. Perhaps it
Roger Bolan wrote:
Some Information Development groups don't even produce BookManager format
output but produce some books in PDF format only now.
Eclipse-based Infocenters are the in thing now. It's all XML based.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd,
I want to copy OMVS.ROOT to TARGSYS.OMVS.ROOT in batch. Omvs.root is my
production and Targsys.omvs.root is my new system I'm build.
JL
At 03:41 PM 3/7/2008, you wrote:
Can anyone tell me how to copy the OMVS.ROOT from a batch job?
JL
Jason Lowe - Mainframe Systems - Cornell Information
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 15:00:07 -0600, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
It definitely would take administrator intervention. There are JES2
changes and maybe even VTAM changes.
--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable
A sample JCL (DSS control statements may need to be reviewed):
//RSTJAVA EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU,REGION=0M,PARM='TYPRUN=NORUN'
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSABEND DD SYSOUT=*
//OUT DD DISP=SHR,UNIT=3390,VOL=SER=...
We use Shared Spool and NJE. However, because of volume, particularly
during peak periods, when the transfer can be hundreds or thousands of
millions of lines per shift, where shared DASD is available, we run jobs
on one plex to create reports in files and then trigger jobs on another
system
If you have all LPARs on the network and have FTP servers on each, would it be
possible to use the FTP JES interface to GET/PUT the JES content over that
interface?
Jon Nolting
EPG Compete - CATM
Enterprise Technology Architect
(425) 707-9334 (O)
(925) 381-2375 (M)
(425) 222-7969 (H)
ives at
We use Dynamic Pavs and I'm wondering if there is a way to measure if we
have enough PAVs?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Hello,
We have just upgraded from z/OS Version 1.7 to Version 1.9.
I have defined *MASTER* as a STC in WLM with a Report Class of RMASTER. I
ran my monthly report by Report Class and the RMASTER Report Class dropped
from about 44 minutes of CPU per day to 3 minutes of CPU per day. Do you
We have a job that has a posting step that runs 6-7 minutes last year. We
noticed that the job more than doubled starting with the first processing day
of 2008. The application owners swear that no changes were made on there
side and the systems guys swear that no changes were made on their
On 7 Mar 2008 12:41:47 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (McKown, John) wrote:
How many places have implemented tapeless backup
environments? I
don't mean virtual tape that has tape on the back-end but
no tape at
all. We are exploring
I need to look at some SMF 30 records. I have extracted them to a file, but
am don't have the capability to view them. Does anyone have any JCL to
could format this in a viewable format?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
We have a similar issue in our shop. The midrange area wants tapeless. the
Mainframe side TAPE.
We have a VTS and ATL. We use the product DRVI to stack the VTS Tape backups
to an real tape and ship it offsite for DR purposes. Tape is cheap. tape can
survive years in a dusty hole and still
Download File 019 from the CBT.
www.cbttape.org/cbtdowns.htm.
HTH,
Greg
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of gsg
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 3:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Extracting SMF 30 records
I need to look
Have you looked at RMF data to see what the job is doing?
Do you have products like STROBE or OMEGAMON that can help you isolate the jobs
run?
Is the application cycle controled by products like ENDEVOR or ChangeMan? If
so, you can then verify when changes have been made to the application
Does this job, by any chance, do any calendar / date calculation or
conversion using home-grown code? Code, that was optimized for years up to
and including 2007, but not 2008?
Does this job copy / append data to a dataset which is growing every day?
Regards,
Ulrich Krueger
-Original
You can go to the www.cbttape.org web site and download the CBT files 617 and
523.
CBT file 617 is a REXX program that will give you a report using SMF 30 type
records.
CBT file 523 is an assembler program that will extract SMF records you select
using SYSIN control cards. You can also
I did a search on Course ES210 and came up empty/not found. I too would be
very interested in attending and/or doing an online course..
-- Original Message --
Received: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 04:39:47 AM EST
From: R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Any RMM Training
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 20:33:38 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, forgot to mention that I have been trying to get the system progs
to setup NJE but for some reason, they are reluctant to do so
Why?
Could be a good reason... but if both systems are in the same shop,
probably not a
I haven't been following this but has anyone suggested setting up a CTC
between the LPAR's. The connection is setup over Escon channels.
Pat Mihalec
Rush University Medical Center
Senior System Programmer
(312) 942-8386
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe
Thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Disagree there. We have many disparate systems in this shop (and others that
I've been at) that there is no way... even with a true business need
that I would consider trying to move into a shared spool environment.
Technical reasons can out weigh business needs. Security is another
issue.
Pat Mihalec wrote:
I haven't been following this but has anyone suggested setting up a CTC
between the LPAR's. The connection is setup over Escon channels.
Or, better yet, TCP/IP over HiperSockets should be *screaming* fast --
assuming the LPARs are on the same CPC.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Miller, Pat wrote:
I need to exchange files with an agency that uses sftp and SSH-2. From looking
at the archives and the TCP/IP Implementation red book (vol 2, std apps), I am
unclear whether I can use ftps and AT-TLS or am stuck with sftp.
I'm not sure what platform they operate from,
I've been biting my tongue over this, but seeing as how it's the
weekend ...
Last I looked at it the whole install/documentation setup was a bloody
fiasco.
Doesn't sound like much (enough) has changed in the ensuing 12-18
months.
Shane...
Looking in the UK catalog there is http://www-
05.ibm.com/services/learning/uk/ta-iris.nsf/(ExtCourseNr)/SS21GB
In US catalog ES270 does reference it from operations view.
If you contract with IBM for the migration or support for migration to rmm
there is education offered as part of that.
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 13:37:30 -0800, Jon Nolting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have all LPARs on the network and have FTP servers on each, would it
be possible to use the FTP JES interface to GET/PUT the JES content over
that interface?
Jon Nolting
EPG Compete - CATM
Enterprise Technology
gsg wrote:
We use Dynamic Pavs and I'm wondering if there is a way to measure if we
have enough PAVs?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
Contrary to popular belief, there is no reason to worry about your migration
from 1.4 to 1.9. I have performed that particular upgrade 3 times in just
the past 2 months (1 university and two utilities), and to 1.8 before that
several times with no problems. There were some comments earlier about
Ted,
I sent it because when we started the previous beta, I received more than 20
emails from people on the list that complained that they didn't know about
the beta in enough advance time and thus were not allowed to participate
because of the 150 site limit.
My apology was only because I felt
On 7 Mar 2008 14:00:27 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lizette Koehler) wrote:
We have a job that has a posting step that runs 6-7
minutes last year. We noticed that the job more than
doubled starting with the first processing day of
2008.
NJE is by far the best solution, but since they are reluctant to implement
it there isn't much you can do about it. There is a product that the
company I work for sells, called SyzSpool which actively manages the JES
spool and allows you to manage the output by sending it files that are able
to
I've implemented tapeless backup at several of our customer sites. The cost
is obscenely cheap, but it's not for everyone. The advantage it provides is
the ability to ship it easily once it's in the final format. It's
reshapable so that it can be stored on a SAN easily, but can also be
99 matches
Mail list logo
