http://www.info-zip.org is a good bet. Whatever product/freeware you choose it
needs to more or less conform to this format...
https://pkware.cachefly.net/webdocs/APPNOTE/APPNOTE-6.2.0.txt
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
MARTIN, MIKE
Sent:
Thank you Gents for the suggestions and insights.
Much appreciated!
Mike
> >
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on
> > behalf of Mike Hochee [mike.hoc...@aspg.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, F
Looking for some advice on the simplest way to call an authorized assembler
program from a non-compiled Rexx program under TSO/E in batch, with the
requirement that multiple updatable parameters will be passed. Updating
IKJTSOnn and APF authorizing whatever is not a problem. At issue seems to
Hi Rob,
My guess is yes, but that's no definitive answer. SHARE session 16948 -
Leveraging z/OS Comm Server At-TLS, contains the email address of what may be
one of the developers. If no one here provides a definitive answer you might
want to reach out to Lin. I did so several years ago and
Thank you Kolusu and Wayne.
Still slow without the -40 in the URL. Assuming problems must be local to
something in my region.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Sri
h Kolusu
Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2023 7:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Noticed over the past few days that my attempts to access
https://www-40.ibm.com/ websites are frequently met with access attempt failed
due to lack of response from server.
Anyone know what's up with these IBM sites? Cloud migration possibly? JK
Thanks,
Mike
Hey Gary,
I can't recommend these folks as I haven't actually used their services, but
know they offer some assembler courses (including 'advanced', whatever that
means). I've also heard that both BMC and Rocket utilize their training,
unconfirmed. Anyway...
Darren Surch COO
Hi Renato,
Did you notice this statement at the beginning of the IQPPRM* chapter in the
init and tuning reference for z/OS 2.5...
Note: The IQPPRMxx will still be valid on IBM zEnterprise z15 and above
processors, but the tunable
options will no longer be available. Therefore, a message
was sent from outside your organization.
To paraphrase Juvenal, "sed quis custodit ipsos custodes?" ("but who guards the
guards themselves?")
On 06/09/2021 21:15, Mike Hochee wrote:
> Just a word of thanks to the IBM heavyweights (Jim, Peter, Sri, et. al.) to
> whom a
Just a word of thanks to the IBM heavyweights (Jim, Peter, Sri, et. al.) to
whom a debt of gratitude is owed for their deep-water expertise, patience, and
willingness to share knowledge when they undoubtedly have many other things to
work on.
I suspect there are many subscriber motivations
Wow! Who woulda thunk it, unless you actually been there? Good to know. Thank
you!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Peter Relson
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2021 8:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: LOAD
My apologies if this has already been mentioned, but the likelihood of a
program I've written executing correctly the first time, is almost always
commensurate with the time I've spent reviewing/walking thru the code before
testing. For me, this relationship holds true regardless of language.
.Addressability 00560004
Line numbering and Jira ticket annotations are not good. Source code is not the
right place for history. It was a heavy lift to convince our seasoned devs of
the benefits of Git but they are mostly on board now.
On 9/08/2021 10:47 am, Mike Hochee
Hi David,
Interesting post. I don't agree either. I think it is more of a multiverse. I
think phenomena like Solar Winds is a good reasons to host your own and not
rely on the admin quality of another vendor's cloud hosting. (AWS has to
employ some of the best cloud admins in the world, yet
Hi Colin,
Best way probably varies depending on the use case, but basically you have two
choices; public or private key cryptography. With private key (aka symmetric )
the same key is used to encrypt and decrypt, and the key must be securely
shared among business partners (a vulnerability).
There was at least one apar for this kind of behavior, covered several of the
SYMBOLS= values including EXECSYS...
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/apar/OA50636 but it addressed in z/OS 2.2
and involved JES3
HTH,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
if they had a cross lab team
to look into it. Most of the activities I see in the trace should not be
there for a well tuned system!
Colin
On Sun, 18 Jul 2021 at 17:13, Mike Hochee wrote:
> Wow, really nice work Colin! Addresses root cause for the high z/OSMF
> CPU, and is ver
create threads, lots of getmains...
lots of freemains, delete threads: repeat). Ive suggested that z/OSMF
development document/fix this.
Colin
On Sat, 17 Jul 2021 at 21:29, Mike Hochee wrote:
> Thank you Ed, excellent suggestion.
>
> I too have felt the z/OSMF cpu cycles
Thank you Ed, excellent suggestion.
I too have felt the z/OSMF cpu cycles were exorbitant, but assuming you have
sufficient zIIP capacity and ZZ=YES, which now appears to be the default, then
high cycles might in reality be more of a perception problem if a person is
looking at a generalized
Other 'entities' might include shareholders or policyholders.
I don't agree that 'everyone else' is moving from the mainframe. Most large
financial institutions are certainly not. They bank on z system's inherent
security and integrity. To be sure, their admins are missing out on the thrill
Hi ITschak,
I would direct your question to Bruce Armstrong, armst...@us.ibm.com He is the
Z Offering manager and has answered my Zowe questions.
HTH,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of ITschak Mugzach
Sent:
! This message was sent from outside your organization.
Hi Mike,
ZOOM on CBT File 671
Please see cbttape.org
Regards,
David
On 2021-07-08 15:00, Mike Hochee wrote:
> Hi,
> Some years ago I recall working in an environment where I could position my
> cursor anywhere within a DSN or DSN(m
Hi,
Some years ago I recall working in an environment where I could position my
cursor anywhere within a DSN or DSN(mbr) (from an ISPF edit or view session)
and then depress PFnn to start and stack a new view or edit session for the
referenced DSN. I believe this capability was also available
I suspect I'm a 'man overboard' on this one, but don't feel I need a life
preserver. Having worked on some larger products with many many moving parts,
and not of my own making, I would always welcome the use of Token_Len, and if
it is being used to prime a register, no comment really needed.
The label Token_Len has obvious meaning.
The number 5 has no intrinsic meaning from just looking at the instruction and
requires context/comment.
When it comes time to change the length of a token, or locate usage
occurrences, I would much prefer to hunt for Token_Len rather than
from 1998. I've found if I set that
to, say 25000, my transfers run about 10 times faster (well, I never really
measured, but it really helps). So check for that and bump up the number (a
lot) if it's 2500 or so.
On 5/1/2021 4:27 PM, Mike Hochee wrote:
> I think there is a lot to like ab
I think there is a lot to like about Vista TN3270, price per seat being just
one of many.
However I do rely on IND$FILE quite regularly and found it to be rather
sluggish using OOTB defaults. Hopefully there exists a buffer size adjustment
or some other setting which improves throughput in
'60010004'
We were told that the "60" at the start of that value is the sign that zEDC was
used.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mike Hochee
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2021 10:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How to te
> I know how to check with LISTCAT whether a file WAS compressed via zEDC, but
> I would like to know how to tell whether or not it WILL be used when creating
> a new file in a given DASD pool.
It depends on whether you are running on a z15 or not, and if not, the values
in effect for the
Hi Charles,
Almost 10 years old now, but I've always thought this was an xlnt
presentation...
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/system/files/support/swg/swgdocs.nsf/0/2b7dd92c65e0defe85257a2b0057759b/$FILE/Leveraging_ATTLS.pdf
I posted the following about 6mos ago for a similar question.
I like IBM's Unicode Services on z/OS for internationalization and conversion
support, but of course z/OS only. A corresponding set of services and functions
provided by IBM for LUW platforms as a free download would be most welcome!
The following utility may have already been mentioned, but
There exist a number of scheduling solutions available for LUW workloads, IBM's
Tivoli Workload Schedule is definitely among them...
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/tivoli-workload-scheduler-version-851-3
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
] On Behalf
Of Mike Hochee
Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2020 5:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Determining required z/series hardware level - REVISED
Warning! This is a fake (spoofed) message. DO NOT TRUST!
Oops, got the hardware lvl for AHI wrong, so changed 'G9' to 'G10'
Hi,
I'm
Oops, got the hardware lvl for AHI wrong, so changed 'G9' to 'G10'
Hi,
I'm looking for a utility/program which is capable of reading a z/OS
executable, whether an lmod or program object, or unbound object code, and
examining it for hardware/architecture level compatibility. I'm not
Hi,
I'm looking for a utility/program which is capable of reading a z/OS
executable, whether an lmod or program object, or unbound object code, and
examining it for hardware/architecture level compatibility. I'm not
specifically referring to the ARCLVL of on the SYSSTATE macro, although I know
Supportability had definitely crossed my mind, so the clarification is both
timely and appreciated.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Peter Relson
Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2020 8:22 PM
To:
Thanks to everyone for the xlnt suggestions.
Much appreciated,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mike Hochee
Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2020 2:25 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Invoking IFASMFDP
Wondering if anyone has attempted to invoke the SMF IFASMFDP utility (handles
dumping and clearing of SMF data set logs, digital signature validation, etc.)
via program invocation using CALL, LINK, or ATTACH? Some of the dfp utilities
allow dynamic invocation from a program, and for those some
I call LE C++ from non-LE assembler programs by first creating a Language
Environment for them using IBM pre-initialization services. Check out CEEPIPI
in chapter 30 of the following...
https://www-01.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/zOSV2R3sa380682/$file/ceea200_v2r3.pdf
I
You might make a case to your security admins for UACC(NONE) for data set(s)
involving your profile or add a profile for a specific data set with universal
access none, yet providing you with whatever is needed; read, update, or alter.
(this assumes you are using RACF, not sure of the TSS or
len.sa...@gdit.com
URL: www.gdit.com<http://www.gdit.com>
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Mike Hochee
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 11:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Checksum/Md5 file
[External: Use caution with
Do you have any special characters in your password that might not be surviving
code-page translate?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Wendell Lovewell
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 8:15 PM
To:
Hi Len Sasso,
As mentioned, you can roll your own and invoke an ICSF service routine, or you
can use one of several z/OS crypto products. I work for ASPG, so am
particularly familiar with MegaCryption on z/OS. With MegaCryption this can be
done using the MGCMAIN utility or via an application
On Behalf
Of Mike Hochee
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2020 3:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM splitting into two companies
I do not have an accurate big picture nor a decent set of data to work with,
but here are a few google hits that do not inspire confidence, just anecdotal
stuff
I do not have an accurate big picture nor a decent set of data to work with,
but here are a few google hits that do not inspire confidence, just anecdotal
stuff of course
https://www.cbronline.com/news/aws-servers-hacked-rootkit-in-the-cloud
Over the last few years I have hoped IBM would become more of a cloud player
and attempt to marry some of the long-standing and well established zEnterprise
strengths; security, reliability, extensibility, performance, etc., with what
I always perceived to be an inherently less secure cloud
Hi Joseph,
I like your idea, especially if this is a one-off, you already have it written,
and the system it's running on is not totally i/o or cpu constrained. If it
becomes something that needs to run regularly, maybe that's a different story
and you rewrite using DFSORT or whatever.
HTH,
If you can call a small assembler subroutine from the current COBOL pgm being
executed (may be possible to do this in COBOL as well), use of the following
fields should help get you current program name, callers name..., callers name,
etc.. As mentioned, LE may make a difference, not sure.
Regarding the AT-TLS issue, your pagent is likely encountering a problem in the
FTP section (of course!). Look at the log it generates, and if you don't have
one, add the logging option to the pagent start command. If I remember
correctly, there's also a verbose setting. I found the logs to be
Consistent with your comment about BPXBATCH, I suspect you will need to run FTP
(via PARM= input) under BPXBATCH (via EXEC PGM=), and then the //STDENV DD
will be read.
HTH,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of
M Mainframe Discussion List" wrote on
08/19/2020 07:01:09 PM:
> From: "Mike Hochee"
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Date: 08/19/2020 09:07 PM
> Subject: Re: Strange S0C4 on z15
> Sent by: "IBM Mainframe Discussion List"
>
> Some months ago I asked a
Some months ago I asked a question regarding the relevance of the ORIGIN parm
on a DSPSERV macro. During that time I came across older documentation which
referred to low-address protection being in effect when the PSF (Private Space
Facility) was not active. My limited understanding is that
Hi Charles,
Not sure why, but the reason code looked very familiar to me. Googling returned
this link...
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/cee1000s-4093-90-cee5101c-bpx1mss-failed-when-using-posix
HTH,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Hi John,
Not sure what your situation is, but Ed Jaffe is quite right, the compression
described in that manual is pretty awful from compaction and efficiency
standpoints, and maybe the API as well, I don't recall.
If you need a good x-platform data compression library that runs on z/OS,
You might check out www.maxmind.com
They offer a variety of 'Geo' prefixed databases, at least one of which
contains domain names, possibly eliminating the need to do DSN lookups.
HTH,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Is it time to mind our Ps and Qs yet?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of PINION, RICHARD W.
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 12:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After
Hi Bob,
If was unfamiliar with assembler, I would not start by attempting to use
RACROUTE macros, as the combination of the two is a lot to chew on IMO.
RACSEQ is a TSO command/utility for RACF written by Bruce wells of IBM some
years ago. Documentation and assembler source are available
RV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Mike Hochee [mike.hoc...@aspg.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 4, 2020 9:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Search engine (retitled)
" Did I mention that I hate google? I wish that there were a real search
engine, one where I would be a customer rather than a pro
, but it's not a "do what I asked for" search engine.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Mike Hochee [mike.hoc...@aspg.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 4,
" Did I mention that I hate google? I wish that there were a real search
engine, one where I would be a customer rather than a product and in which I
only got hits that matched my search criteria."
I use https://duckduckgo.com/ whenever possible, and google when I have to.
-Original
Hi Nguyen,
In practice I don't think the NOALIGN option is used very frequently, probably
because some instructions have alignment dependencies and will generate an
error or warning when the instruction operand is not aligned as expected. There
are undoubtedly exceptional cases where NOALIGN
Some years ago this publication helped me come to a basic understanding of
AT-TLS (apologies if already shared)...
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/leveraging-zos-communications-server-application-transparent-transport-layer-security-tls-lower-cost-and-more-rapid-tls-deployment
HTH
Mike
Hi Lionel,
I did this a few years back and utilized it for a product. Below are a few
items from the product doc and a few more that remain in accessible memory
areas...
- Read the relevant sections of Comm Server IP Configuration Ref, specifically
in the chapter on Policy Agent (PA) and
You may want to look at...
zfsadm shrink
(https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.ioea700/zfsadm_shrink.htm)
HTH,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mark Charles
Sent:
exception to the storage admin
rules.
Please let us know if/when you get an answer.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mike Hochee
Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2020 11:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is there any z/OS API to get byte file size fo
ason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Mike Hochee [mike.hoc...@aspg.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2020 1:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is there any z/OS API to get byte file size for non
Hi Peter,
I came across a similar use case a couple times over the past year or so.
Shifting priorities have prevented me from doing much with it, but while at the
most recent SHARE in Fort Worth, I asked one of the DFSMS architects about it.
She encouraged me to check out the CSI,
Thank you Gents for the best practice and the explanations. Much appreciated,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Don Poitras
Sent: Saturday, March 7, 2020 11:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
STEPLIBing it seems the simplest, but if for some reason that is not possible,
then you likely have to follow your module update with an LLA REFRESH or LLA
UPDATE command. The TSO ISRDDN suggestion can provide module size (assuming it
differs from the old version) using the M option.
HTH,
AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: calculating data set size - compression concern
Caution! This message was sent from outside your organization.
Listcat output changes when fields need more digits. DCollect doesn't change.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 11:20 PM Mike Hochee wrote:
>
> I wa
I was unaware of both DCOLLECT as well as the compression related fields on the
LISTCAT output. Thanks much to Mike and Kolusu. We can use the LISTCAT info
immediately and the DCOLLECT down the road apiece. Appreciate your timely help!
Mike
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
> Define application program? COBOL batch or CICS transaction program?
> Most legacy applications on z/OS don't implement concurrency.
Agreed, they don't implement concurrency, however they are often very heavily
reliant upon on it, as it is built into the database management and message
Yes exactly, that is part of what WLM is designed to do. In the real world most
shops use WLM service classes and velocity goals to control things like CPU
dispatching frequency. I'm sure there exist workloads which tend to defy the
controls available in WLM, but I suspect they are quite rare.
, 2019 3:56 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Problems downloading z/OS 2.2 PDFs from //publibz.boulder.ibm.com
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 19:07:45 +, Mike Hochee wrote:
>Hi, I suspect an IBM doc server issue. Downloads of PDFs from IBM z/OS V2R2
>Elements and Features PDF Downloa
Hi, I suspect an IBM doc server issue. Downloads of PDFs from IBM z/OS V2R2
Elements and Features PDF Downloads (
https://www-01.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/zosv2r2-pdf-download?OpenDocument
) from the z/OS MVS shelf (
Thank you very much Peter!
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Peter Relson
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 9:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ICSF CSN ALET-qualified callable services
It would be very surprising if there were any
Hi Cameron,
Mostly hard-core MVS - z/OS folks on this listserv. Suggest trying DB2-L or
IDUG or InfoSphere groups and presentations. Whether your capturing VSAM
changes or DB2 changes, doing some transforms, whatever, these fall into
Business Intelligence, Data Warehousing, and Database admin
I have not personally used it, only read about it, but the RACF PWFALLBACK
option in a user's MFA segment is feature that might be quite helpful during
implementation/testing.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of
Thanks for all the responses on this one, especially Jim and Peter, and all the
links. I unsubscribed from this list some months ago and re-subscribed last
night, now realizing how much I might have missed (week-long AMODE32 threads
notwithstanding)
The info I initially received was from an
I get the same thing you're experiencing, and I'm on the other side of the
country.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Ed
Jaffe
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2019 10:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: APAR Search Broken Worldwide?
Is
Interesting stuff! Thank you Ed!
I did not realize the OOO execution capabilities were as smart as your example
suggests, and try to write code that runs free of charge whenever possible.
But I will have to give that one a whirl.
And if in your samples, Fields 1-4 happened to be consecutive
Hi Tom,
If you want to roll your own as a learning exercise, the following IBM
publications are quite good...
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/dgt3d410.pdf
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/dgt3d510.pdf
CBT content is of course another source.
HTH,
Mike
Makes sense. One would expect anything in d' money file to be marked
'Corporate Confidential'
I know, pretty bad.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Edward Finnell <000248cce9f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2018
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mike Hochee
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 6:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SEVERE ERROR EDC4002: Unable to write to map file from Prelinker
Hi Charles,
We experienced the same thing several weeks ago
Hi Charles,
We experienced the same thing several weeks ago. It is documented in PHO3870.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?crawler=1=swg1PH03870
HTH,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Charles Mills
Hi Frank,
The limitation is for the entire data set...
Rule: Direct data sets whose records are to be identified by relative track
address must be limited in size to no more than 65 536 tracks for the entire
data set.
The above and more details can be found here...
Hi Tom,
We have been running with OSPROTECT=1 for a couple months now. We ran a few
crypto and i/o oriented utilities as well as product IVPs and noticed no
performance impacts after implementation. That said we are a development shop
and don't run typical customer workloads. I would
Updated answer...
A. With a hare snare!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Friday, August 3, 2018 1:45 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Test only post
Old riddle.
Q. How do you
I have not dealt with such a use case before, but would be inclined to try a
transfer type of image (binary), the LOCSITE subcommand, and a conversion
option of either MBSENDEOL or SBSENDEOL with CRLF.
HTH,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
You may get an answer on this listserv, but might also have better luck with
the RACF listserv... https://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=RACF-L
HTH,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Brian Westerman
Sent:
I have not used it for that specifically, but I don't see why not. The policy
based rules allow for job/task names and support wildcards, and you might not
even need those if you can filter based on a unique port range. I've been
impressed with AT-TLS, as it offers a lot of customization
Hi Sue,
Thanks for soliciting feedback before implementation. A couple thoughts...
1) The link is supposed to point to a main element KC page for z/OS 2.2
(true?), but a number of the PDF links point to z/OS 2.1 manuals, was this by
design?
2) Some of the pdf links refer to manuals where
content?
Hi Mike,
I'm unable to replicate your problem. Please contact me directly and we can try
to get to the bottom of it. Thanks!
-Sue Shumway
On 06/21/18 3:47 PM, Mike Hochee wrote:
> Yes, extremely well stated, and timely too!.
>
> Ironically, it looks like the z/OS 2.2
Yes, extremely well stated, and timely too!.
Ironically, it looks like the z/OS 2.2 Elements and Features pdf link
https://www-304.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/zosv2r2-pdf-download?OpenDocument
now points at numerous z/OS 2.1 manuals. I don't know how extensive the
Yes, I reported issues with both the z/OS 2.1 and 2.2 pdf libraries to IBM last
Friday afternoon. I received a reply that someone by the name of Geoff Smith is
looking into them. I will forward this email to him as well. (Thank you! I
wasn't hallucinating this time!)
Mike
-Original
I'm assuming you replaced the '<' redirection parameter, with the -s parameter
and continue to have the issue. You might try eliminating the text file and -s
parameter altogether, and manually enter the FTP subcommands found in the file.
This doc note for the -s parameter is also
Yes, definitely something like that... AMAPTFLE. It was mentioned in this
NaSPA article as an SMP predecessor...
http://www.naspa.net/magazine/2005/0705/T0507009.pdf
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Gerhard Adam
Hi Charles,
Yes, the answer to your first question appears to be correct...
LOG=NONE suppresses both messages and SMF records regardless of
MSGSUPP=NO. (from RACROUTE Macro Reference)
Not sure if this is configurable, but think it should be.
HTH,
Mike
-Original Message-
From:
I'm sorry, but the following will not answer your immediate question about how
to determine if a zIIP is getting maxed out. I don't know the answer to your
specific question. These comments pertain more to a longer view of performance
monitoring.
In the interim though, you can always try to
Evaluated purely on technical merit, I really like this idea. IMO it comes
close to making some sort of elegant simplicity category. But if evaluated
based on cost benefit, things seem extremely murky indeed. It also appears to
be primarily championed by folks from the Hercules and OS380
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
