.. wasn't the car armoured?
On 2015-11-13 9:11 PM, Ed Gould wrote:
I was surprised that the cop didn't shoot the car.
Ed
On Nov 13, 2015, at 3:25 PM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
Watch the wrap.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/11992795/Police-pull-over-Googles-d
with other users, select a repository database and
configure user access to it.
Found the instructions at 1. difficult to interpret.
Assume: I 'did install the web console'.
Question: should I do a. b. and c.?
Please, thanks
Graham Hobbs
Points taken Tim. Hadn't seen that link before.
Thanks kindly.
On 2015-04-16 4:38 PM, Tim Hare wrote:
I don't think you want to sell this as 'mainframe'. I think you want to sell
this as 'Enterprise class, cost-saving, Linux virtualization box'... the
server folk have already attached
Noted, thanks.
On 2015-04-16 6:15 PM, Linda Hagedorn wrote:
Remember IBM's Master The Mainframe Contest students.
In addition to making a z platform case, there's a fresh group of trained kids
available every year.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 16, 2015, at 5:03 PM, Graham Hobbs gho
Thanks kindly.
On 2015-04-16 8:53 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
Ibm vendor disclosure meeting.
CharlesSent from a mobile; please excuse the brevity
Original message
From: Graham Hobbs gho...@cdpwise.net
Date: 04/16/2015 7:38 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
such corruption, interception,
tampering, amendment or viruses or any consequence thereof.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Graham Hobbs
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 10:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re
Folks,
Hope I'm doing this right.
I don't think there's any IBM mainframes in Windsor anymore but am
looking for any dinosaurs who might be cajoled into help develop/present
a mainframe case at County level.
cheers,
Graham Hobbs
Am in touch with IBM NY but was looking for old mainframe buddies in
Windsor .. seems they're not on IBM-MAIN.
On 2015-04-15 1:58 PM, Tom Marchant wrote:
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 12:58:50 -0400, Graham Hobbs wrote:
I don't think there's any IBM mainframes in Windsor anymore
I don't know
Of Graham Hobbs
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 9:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Windsor, Ontario, Canada mainframers
Hi John,
Thanks for the thought, am already in touch with IBM. Am trying to find my old
mainframe mates in Windsor to help the cause. Not looking good:'( Graham
Marchant
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 1:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Windsor, Ontario, Canada mainframers
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 12:58:50 -0400, Graham Hobbs wrote:
I don't think there's any IBM mainframes in Windsor anymore
I don't know if there are either, but if I stand up at my
Seconded.
All the business systems in the world seem to work just fine so they
must have been written by systems programmers:-D
On 2015-04-13 9:21 AM, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
Sorry for this rant but I just had to step in on this conversation. That is
the most hoary, antiquated, and
Timothy,
Thanks for your comments. Am in touch with IBM. Your questions:
Has any municipality IT, having grown from nothing, likely to be
anything but server farm/Unix/Microsoft (you know what I mean) plus off
the shelf packages.
DR - what's that .. you mean backup?
I would guess our 7
Hi Mitch,
Am about to chat with Raj Datta tomorrow.
The more stories I hear about consolidation the more encouraged I am.
Just makes sense.
Graham
On 2015-03-05 7:35 AM, Mitch wrote:
Hello again:
I am in the U.S. (Central Time Zone), so reach out at your convenience. I
recently returned
the shelf municipal software, b) inhouse programmers, c) a combo.
Clearly there is so much missing info from myself .. nevertheless ..
might it be a $ practical situation worth pursuing .. a central
mainframe/software for $5?
Thanks
Graham Hobbs
.. nevertheless .. might it be a $ practical
situation worth pursuing .. a central mainframe for $5M, $2M? .. ballpark
.. how much? .. suggest where I start?
Thanks, be nice
Graham Hobbs
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
Why is it a PITA? Is there a typical value you use on the OUTLIM?
Please, thanks,
Graham Hobbs
On 11/03/2014 3:14 PM, John McKown wrote:
I use OUTLIM on the individual SYSOUT= statements to force an S722. But
that can be PITA.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Barry Merrill ba...@mxg.com wrote
Is this it http://www.csi-international.com because I got'this page cant
be displayed'
On 07/02/2014 4:48 PM, Jim Thomas wrote:
Folks,
Forgive me if this sounds like a sales or marketing call ... but ... I do
own a product that does the same
as SYSB-II does and IMHO, better.
If interested,
What of GNU COBOL? Is free.
Graham Hobbs
On 22/01/2014 4:48 PM, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
I imagine one could use Micro Focus COBOL and its JVM support. I suppose
mainframe file I/O might be a problem, though.
There's also this: http://www.veryant.com/products/iscobol/cobol-compiler.php
Is Graham Harris talking about what I use? Haven't got time to dig.
If you mean the GNU COBOL compiler, I installed it on a W7. Partial
agony, but it works well, no CICS emulation yet. BUT for you Linuxy
types all the gurus there are that way inclined:-). URL I access is
Is the macro language still C?
- Original Message -
From: Michael Knigge michael.kni...@set-software.de
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 5:18 AM
Subject: AW: [slightly] off topic: SPFPRO on Win 8.1
Steve,
I don't know
.
But with all these goings on am discouraged at what's happening .. the
oommpff is vanishing.
I read the message as: a) anyone in my boat might awkwardly get by, b) new
boarders must pony up 9 grand or forget it.
Graham Hobbs
.. is the urge for z/OS software abating?
- Original Message
on Windows 7. IBM
has not made, plus as I understand it, a COBOL compiler which works on
Windows 7. I am in the same position, but do have a System z to connect
to as a test platform.
I too wish I could test locally on Windows 7.
Cheers,
Thomas Dunlap
On 6/18/2013 5:34 PM, Graham Hobbs wrote
and Windows 7.
Cheers,
Thomas Dunlap
On 6/19/2013 11:39 AM, Graham Hobbs wrote:
Thomas, Barry,
Sorry to bother you again. Any chance you think/know that RDz 7.6
would run under XP virtual machine? If I downloaded/installed 7.6
(from SAC) do you think IBM may have removed the COBOL compiler
.
But I understand that Rational Developer for System z V8.5 does not 'do' COBOL
on Windows 7 so am thinking my new world should be Rational Developer for
zEnterprise V8.0.3 and would appreciate any comments/advice about that.
Graham Hobbs
? Something
different?
Please, thanks
Graham Hobbs
e.g.
a PDS where I put load members
Data class . . . . . : **None**
Organization . . . : PO Current Utilization
Record format . . . : U Used tracks . . . . : 84
Record
/db2z_precompiler_data_sets.htm
-Original Message-
From: Graham Hobbs [mailto:gho...@cdpwise.net]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 12:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: DBRMLIB destination PDS
Hello,
Am looking for the specs of a dataset into which the output from a
COBOL/CICS/SQL //DBRMLIB should go
Hello Barbara, other kind folk,
Am not ADCD, am Dallas guest z/OS with seven days left to get Debug
working, not a sysprog, User Guide is only 576 pages, Installation Guide
similiar:-))).
Have dug into EZA111.SEQATLIB, found EQAZDFLT (which refs IGY.SIGYCOMP),
EQAZDSYS and EQAZDUSR,
(IGF - IWM) but isn't there,
googled but told me little, so possible someone might know where I
messed up?
As usual, please, thanks
Graham Hobbs
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
, for example the DB loadparm member starts DB2,
CICS and MQ.
We use the AUTO utility for STC startup on Dallas and z/VM EXECS to
startup and shutdown to a QUIESCE and CP LOGOFF state.
Wayne
Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Graham Hobbs gho...@cdpwise.net wrote:
Hi Wayne,
DBPROCAG .. co
:
Graham,
On most Dallas setups you will have a DBPROCAG for a DBA TSO logon
proc. Once logged on you should have the DB2 Admin tool and SPUFI.
Most of what you have been doing can be done without running batch
jobs.
HTH
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Graham Hobbs gho...@cdpwise.net wrote:
Hello
Thanks, still didn't work:-( but Ron's post explained why.
On 27/05/2013 10:26 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In 51a2b33f.3060...@cdpwise.net, on 05/26/2013
at 09:13 PM, Graham Hobbs gho...@cdpwise.net said:
Does that imply IKJEFT01 can't do it,
No, it implies that a hyphen
(DSNTIAD) PLAN(DSNTIAD) -
LIB('your.RUNLIB.LOAD')
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSUDUMP DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSINDD *
CREATE STOGROUP CHELGRP
VOLUME VPWRKD
VCAT CHELCAT
;
/*
Regards,
Ron
From: Graham Hobbs gho...@cdpwise.net
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date
CHELGRP
VOLUME VPWRKD
VCAT CHELCAT
;
/*
Regards,
Ron
From: Graham Hobbs gho...@cdpwise.net
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 27/05/2013 01:10 AM
Subject:DFHUTILB and DFHUPROC
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Wisdom
Wisdom sought please! I have tried to build a stogroup via batch job.
CREATE STOGROUP CHELGRP
VOLUME VPWRKD
VCAT CHELCAT
Seems DFHUPROC and DFHUTILB are options. Is one more common than the other?
Is it that the first calls the second (amongst others)?
Cheers,
Graham Hobbs
P.S. Secretly am
.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Graham Hobbs
Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2013 10:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: DFHUTILB and DFHUPROC
Wisdom sought please! I have tried to build a stogroup via batch job
=*
//SYSUDUMP DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSTSIN DD
- DSN SYSTEM(ssid)
- CREATE STOGROUP CHELGRP
VOLUME VPWRKD
VCAT CHELCAT
Perry Mayes
Sent from hand held device
Graham Hobbs gho...@cdpwise.net 26/05/2013 4:44:26 PM
Hi Lizette,
Oiyoiyoi .. I meant DSNUTILB and DSNUPROC .. so sorry:-((.
I sort
Hello Terry,
Here's what's happened .. three days before my original post, I had
emailed IBM but heard nothing thus the post. Sent a reminder email to
IBM and got an instant response and as Friday wore on, a solution
(they're good).
It seems that what I'd learned here and did was correct.
Hi Terry,
Thanks, am getting a bit knotted with all the incoming info helping me,
if I may ..
--
I use batch DFHCSDUP just for DEFINE'ing all my pgms, maps, files and
transid's (avg 20 each time) because is part of an automated process
(RDO is a non-starter). The entries seem to 'stick'
? I have shut down CICS, reloaded via the DFHCSDUP, done
START=INITIAL, various combos thereof .. nothing!
Please, thanks
Graham Hobbs
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists
Director
Graham,
According to the FAQ at
http://www6.software.ibm.com/dldirector/doc/DDfaq_en.html there is nothing
to install, you just JAVA installed.
So all you need do is click on a link to download some file with Download
Director.
On 5/16/2013 6:57 PM, Graham Hobbs wrote:
Hello
therein. OK so I go to SAC and find Systems
Director is 4580mb, i.e enormous but I only need DD:-(.
SAC offers DD and HTTP and since I shortly need to download RDz and TXSeries am
keen to get DD up and running again.
So might DD be out there somewhere in teeny tiny form?
cheers
Graham Hobbs
Ed, Barbara, Lizette,
Thanks, am comfortable to know that I'm not purging anything critical since
if anything does go wrong am at Dallas's IIC disposal.
Cheers,
Graham
- Original Message -
From: Ed Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To:
STD LOCAL 3,499
SYSLOG STC00091 +MASTER+ 128 C STD LOCAL 3,592
I see nothing therein of interest to me except the third field seems to be a
date. Mine run from 13074 to 13129. Do I need to keep them, some, none, all?
Please thanks.
Graham
My gratitude to all who helped. Every time I come with these questions I
learn much, this time including how to read. Finished up with what Terry and
George proposed:
//AP02 JOB (CONRAD),'IBMUSE2',
// CLASS=A,MSGCLASS=0,MSGLEVEL=(1,1)
//JOBLIB DD
Folks,
I thankyou - still not resolved - going to bed:-(. Back on Thursday, bad day
tomorrow, experiments todo.
If it's this ugly for COBOL/CICS, my next week will be COBOL/CICS/DB2
compiles .. yuk
Graham
- Original Message -
From: Graham Hobbs gho...@cdpwise.net
Newsgroups
am simply placing or coding SIZE slightly incorrectly .. very frustrating.
Again, please, thanks
Graham Hobbs
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu
Hello,
Another question .. I have four PDS's of copybooks, pgms, sysexec, proclib. I'd
like to search the four for something. Have looked at 3.14 and 3.15 but seems
that I can only search one PDS at a time. Is this the case, have I missed
something?
Please, thanks,
Graham Hobbs
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Graham Hobbs
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 1:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: PDS searches
Hello,
Another question .. I have four PDS's of copybooks, pgms, sysexec,
proclib. I'd like to search the four
: Monday, April 29, 2013 7:09 PM
Subject: Re: PDS searches
On 2013-04-29 16:59, Graham Hobbs wrote:
Gentlemen,
Thanks again, after ten years away from mainframe had forgotten 'srchfor'
so finally came up with
//SEARCH JOB (CONRAD),'GH',
// CLASS=A,MSGCLASS=0,MSGLEVEL=(1,1
: Run a REXX from JCL stream
In FDD1A4F653CC4D9380931CC4899381AD@graham, on 04/27/2013
at 08:27 PM, Graham Hobbs gho...@cdpwise.net said:
Subject: Run a REXX from JCL stream
That's not how IKJEFT011 works.
Am a 'not a sysprog'
You don't need to be an SP to use IKJEFT01.
//SYSTSIN DD DSN
, thanks,
Graham Hobbs
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Industry Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15275
Direct: 724-517-2633
FAX: 412-490-9230
chuck.har...@thermofisher.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Graham Hobbs
Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2013 8:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
)
/*
.. at this point I'd //STEP2 to be JCL to pick out PGM0047 from SDSF;O and copy
it into IBMUSE2.QKVS.PRNT133(PGM0047) to be followed by many other steps e.g.
//STEP3EXEC PGM=PGNAA01
etc
Please make my day, thanks,
Graham Hobbs
P.S. As an aside can it be edited
to a PDS via JCL
Graham Hobbs wrote:
but I have compiled program PGM0047 and the output is in SDSF:O. Can I get
this output into a 133 byte PDS via a step in a JCL stream e.g:
It is possible, but what output? From compiling PGM0047 or the PGM0047's
output?
Depending how you compiled PGM0047
pisze:
On 2013-04-20, at 03:02, R.S. wrote:
W dniu 2013-04-20 02:49, Graham Hobbs pisze:
Hello, In a JCL stream there are several F,B output files I'd like to
put into a single PDS. Each file has a different LRECL? If I allocate
the PDS with LRECL = the longest file's LRECL, can I do this? Am
to a solitary DELETE PDSNAME
From what I've learned there are 'ways' but nothing simple/simple. My thanks
for the help.
Graham
- Original Message -
From: Graham Hobbs gho...@cdpwise.net
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 8:49 PM
Subject
Hello,
On Dallas IIC from my z/VM control userid I issued and got:
send etpgabc \cp sleep
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 16:33:32
qsleep etpgabc
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 16:33:51
What tells me if the guest z/OS system is actually asleep or have I done
something wrong?
cheers
Graham Hobbs
'
On 4/6/2013 2:44 PM, Graham Hobbs wrote:
On Dallas IIC from my z/VM control userid I issued and got:
send etpgabc \cp sleep
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 16:33:32
qsleep etpgabc
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 16:33:51
What tells me if the guest z/OS system is actually asleep or have I done
something wrong?
Back
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Graham Hobbs
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 9:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: PDS processing in REXX
Hello,
OK to ask for some help please, or where might I go?:-) Am not a sysprog,
hope to be back on a z/OS machine
SAY 'I: 'RC_REASON' OK'
END
RETURN
.. thanks in advance,
Graham Hobbs
PS. Not being 'deep' .. why is I/O coding different between mainframe and
ooREXX? Did it have to be?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
Earlier today I saw the following:
http://www.businessinsider.com/10-tech-skills-that-will-instantly-net-you-10-salary-2013-2#fortran-is-worth-103000-18
.. makes COBOL $200k/300k??
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Being naive - assuming Microsoft are enormous, not having IBM iron, with
what hardware/software do they maintain their business?
Graham Hobbs
---
- Original Message -
From: Itschak Mugzach imugz...@gmail.com
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent
on an affordable platform? Where can little people like me read a
succinct 'blow by blow' what I might do?
As an aside, why don't/can't courts impose twenty year sentences to stop
this nonsense?
Graham Hobbs
- Original Message -
From: Timothy Sipples sipp...@sg.ibm.com
Newsgroups
By 'prior art' might you be suggesting 'copyright'?
Graham Hobbs
- Original Message -
From: John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 11:48 AM
Subject: Re: OT: IBM #1 in number of patents for 2012. It's
John,
Could one conclude then, that inventing a software piece, copyrighting it
(thus on a Govt database thus a public domain), a third party can patent the
invention and you could end up paying the third party to use your own
software?
I read your comments closely and the above cannot
Phil, au contraire, I find it ontopic. I work in isolation and when subjects
such as this threaten to disrupt my PC RDz and TXSeries setup in unbeknownst
ways, I read with concern about impacts and watch fors offered by this
group - I pay attention. Commentary from Elardus was noted.
Graham
Southern Ontario too but automatic updates is off, but missed the teeny tiny
little checkbox not to install chrome.
Am I wrong, is google becoming a nasty player?
Graham Hobbs
- Original Message -
From: Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN
anti-trust investigation.
US and EU!
--Original Message--
From: Paul Gilmartin
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
ReplyTo: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Ot: GOOGLE Chrome
Sent: 18 Nov 2012 20:54
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 19:55:33 -0500, Graham Hobbs
Unless I've missed something 'The first 80 pages of the lecture file'
downloads in its entirelty but there's no rightmost scroll bar, all I can
see is the title page. Rest are OK.
.. is me??
Graham Hobbs
- Original Message -
From: Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com
Newsgroups
.. was me:-)
- Original Message -
From: Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2012 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: Sample course materials
On 10/14/2012 3:32 PM, Graham Hobbs wrote:
Unless I've missed
/groups/dir?lnk=nhpsfghl=en-GBq=IBM-MAIN
18162 subscribers, Messages per month: 1665, Usenet
http://groups.google.com/groups/dir?lnk=nhpsfghl=en-GBq=CICS-L
3924 subscribers, Usenet
Chris Mason
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:13:29 -0400, Graham Hobbs gho...@cdpwise.net wrote:
Arte there any available
I found I could 'join' Share as a 'non-member' and got to the post - cost
nothing.
Graham Hobbs
- Original Message -
From: Martin Packer martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: Proof
.. maybe in another newsgroup
- Original Message -
From: Mike Danner mike_dan...@hotmail.com
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: OT, but a perfect story for a Friday.
You store it underground in an unused
.. and she didn't have your experience, your salary or your brain .. bully
for you Scott!
Graham Hobbs
- Original Message -
From: Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 8:12 PM
Subject: Re: File
74 matches
Mail list logo
