Hello All,
Recently discovered that an ADRDSSU DUMP job ignores datasets from the INCLUDE
selection if the source is migrated.
Looked at the documentation to find that there isn't a keyword I can use to
force it to consider MIGRATx datasets too.
Is this ideal, or is there a case for an RFE here
Just a quick note to all who have so kindly responded. I am going to be out of
the office for this week and will look at these responses in more detail when I
get back.
I used LINKINST, as this was mentioned in the DB2 KC as my program is AMODE(31)
RMODE(24).
Regards – Grant
DTCC Internal
Then you should submit an RCF. That is incorrect.
If fact, I cannot think of any AMODE/RMODE combination which it would be valid
as it returns via BR 14.
Well. if your program is 24/24 and you load it above the line, and you
wish this convoluted code.
L
Hi all
We found that ESQA is exhausted, it overflow to ECSA.We want to enlarge ESQA
and ECSA . Because the common area is enlarged,the private area will
be decreased. We wonder whether there is any risk to enlarge common area ?
Thanks a lot!
Jason Cai
So you have some overflow into ECSA from ESQA. So what?
Seriously, some overflow is normal and reasonable - but far from
universal. Is there any reason to suggest it's actually a problem? (RMF
Virtual Storage report - from SMF 78-2 - would help you analyse this.)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
On 4/16/2018 4:51 AM, Jason Cai wrote:
Hi all
We found that ESQA is exhausted, it overflow to ECSA.We want to enlarge ESQA
and ECSA . Because the common area is enlarged,the private area will
be decreased. We wonder whether there is any risk to enlarge common area ?
Thanks a lot!
Jason C
Jason,
If you stick to expanding ESQA and/or ECSA, the risk should be minimal to none.
The E says extended and so unless you have address spaces bumping against the
2GB limit, making a small decrease in the above-the-line private shouldn't
cause you any issues. Now, if you were talking SQA or
I am pleased to invite you to a GSE Large Systems Working Group event. The
event will be a virtual event via WebEx on the 25th April 2018 from 15:00 –
17:00 BST.
The event will contain 2 sessions presented by Marna Walle from IBM and Richard
Faulhaber from New Era Software:
* Small Enhanc
I generally do not worry too much about a few hundred MB above the line when I
have 2GB available to me.
I *strongly* suggest you take some usage statistics and allocate both area
(ECSA and ESQA) such that "normal usage" us about 30% of the allocated area.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From:
We use to use ABARS to backup application with migrated datasets,
The ABARS task would backup both the dasd datasets and the Migrated
datasets, In migrated format, It would Stage the ML2 "Tape" for a read of
the "Tape" files. We used that for some Application Backups where the data
would mov
I've searched the archives without success. Perhaps I didn't try correct
keywords.
Does anyone remember a discussion here or elsewhere concerning doubled
ampersands in //SYSIN DD *,SYMBOLS=?
They are not collapsed to single ampersands as in other JCL contexts. IIRC,
the explanation given, perh
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>I've searched the archives without success. Perhaps I didn't try correct
>keywords.
Since you mentioned HLASM, did you also searched Assembler-L?
>Does anyone remember a discussion here or elsewhere concerning doubled
>ampersands in //SYSIN DD *,SYMBOLS=?
AFAIK, I bel
On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:54:48 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
>
>Since you mentioned HLASM, did you also searched Assembler-L?
>
I have, but:
o Since I didn't know the explation involved HLASM when I asked the question,
it's far more likely that I''d have asked here than ASSEBLER-LIST
o IBM's H
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>I have, but:
>o Since I didn't know the explation involved HLASM when I asked the question,
> it's far more likely that I''d have asked here than ASSEBLER-LIST
>o IBM's HLASM lead says that since 2003 he's seen no such discussion there.
Ok.
>I'd have made the opposite d
Maybe I'm missing something?
I issued the $D ACTIVATE command to see if z22 mode would activate and
it indicates I need CYL_MANAGED=ALLOWED turned on. No problem. I'll
just issue the $TSPOOLDEF,CYL_MANAGED=ALLOWED and we should be good.
I then tried to look up the CYL_MANAGED keyword in both
Correct. There is no CYL_MANAGED keyword in JES 2.2.
It is by command only.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Michael Babcock
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 10:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: CYL_MANAGED JES2 v2
Michael Babcock wrote:
>I issued the $D ACTIVATE command to see if z22 mode would activate and it
>indicates I need CYL_MANAGED=ALLOWED turned on. No problem. I'll just issue
>the $TSPOOLDEF,CYL_MANAGED=ALLOWED and we should be good.
>I then tried to look up the CYL_MANAGED keyword in both the
Allan Staller wrote:
>Correct. There is no CYL_MANAGED keyword in JES 2.2.
It is there:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.hasa200/sjes2se.htm
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
--
Fo
What I meant to say, is that CYL-MANAGED cannot be coded in the init deck.
It is only available by command.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 11:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV
Hi Bob,
Sorry for the delay. RACF is showing "TAPE DATA SET PROTECTION IS ACTIVE" .
CA-1 won't allow me to browse the tape using FM if I shrink the DSN or change
it to something other than what is recorded in TMS. ICHBLP is defined with
UACC(NONE) and no users in the access list.
Thanks,
I activated z22 mode in our maint LPAR and it activated fine after the
$TSPOOLDEF command. Then true to the doc, when I issued the $DSPOOLDEF
command CYL_MANAGED no longer showed in the output (since its no longer a
valid INIT deck parm nor a valid command once in z22 mode).
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018
Vignesh,
I think you have bigger problems than this if your scheduled backups don't
run for a week and no one notices.
You can set up DFSMShsm does not delete datasets that do not have a backup.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Sankaranarayanan, V
Allan Staller wrote:
>What I meant to say, is that CYL-MANAGED cannot be coded in the init deck.
>It is only available by command.
Thanks for the head-up. I did not bothered to see if you can do it in the 'init
deck'. (HASPPARM) because the OP talked about an once-off command.
Generally we don'
23 matches
Mail list logo
