Language files seem to be the same for both Killer and Classic Webmail.
Ipswitch reacted by creating a new KB article:
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20040401-DM02.htm
The language files installation worked well on a system with standard
templates.
If you are running Killer Webmail Templates
Using this opportunity lot of users are misbehaving, sending mails
pretending as different user.
That's because SMTP allows you to do that. Trying putting in your favorite
E-mail address into your mail client, and you'll see that you, too, can
send E-mail from that address.
How yahoo is
Good Morning -
I have been monitoring the forum traffic in regards to the Imail 8.1
Release. I am thinking of installing it this weekend. However, I am
questioning if I am going to have problems. I do not use LDAP or collect
user information. Also, I use the standard templates. I am
If you have upgraded to 8.1 and are using the new Classic templates, could
you please post a URL to your web mail so I can see how it looks? The
screenshot posted on IPswitch is not very good.
Thanks!
Tom
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
I just last night upgraded from v8.05 to 8.10 and had serious problems
with performance of Webmail (logins taking about 10 mins) and other
issues with QueueManager crashing and not restarting as it should.
Didn't like the classic web templates so tried to go back to old yellow
standard ones
Thanks, Andrew. I am going to hold off until Ipswitch gets some better results. I
got enough problems and gray hair!!
Greg Shepherd
Engineering Manager
Catalyst Manufacturing Services, Inc.
2507 Wayne Street
Endicott, New York 13760
Phone: 607-786-6300
Fax: (607) 786-6313 or (607) 748-8557
Did you select to convert the LDAP database? This process can be very time
consuming and eat a lot of cpu cycles while it's running. Also, the mailbox
UID format changed slightly so when opening mailboxes for the first time on
8.1 the UID is updated. This could cause a web messaging login delay
This didn't just happen on first login but on every single attempt.
Whilst I can accept what you're saying about there being a delay for
large mail boxes when new UID format is being changed but 10 minutes or
more is poor. So much so that users think it's broken and hence complain
about
Greg,
I've upgraded yesterday as well from 8.05 to 8.10 with as result that the
Queue Manager service failed to start, webmail was soo slow, POP3
service was working sometimes, sometimes not (maybe caused by timeouts).
Downgraded today to 8.05.
This is the last time that I upgrade when
The fix sort of was to run ldap off another port than the default. I changed it to 400
on my second test upgrade on the service started. However I still could not get it to
start on my original test box. I will try the upgrade from 8.0x again and report back
my findings.
Mark
-Original
I am with Travis, we don't use LDAP but I would like to see the user information in
the imail manager with out having to fuss with the new LDAP.
-Original Message-
From: Travis Rabe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 12:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
We're in the process of evaluating Imail for our users. I'd like to know
what kind of performance other users were getting out of it, as I think the
server is under pretty high load and not sure if it is Imail generally
sapping CPU cycles or else we've got something in the config horribly wrong.
Upgraded to 8.1 last night with no problems. I do have a question: I see
that my root on certain Virtual host has like 32000 messages. In any case as
I try to delete them they keep coming back. Is there any way to view these
items or delete them?
Thanks.
Rich
To Unsubscribe:
It appears the queue mgr is failing while attempting local deliveries to some local
users.
Of those few users we have found, they had multiple sub mailboxes and multi level sub
directories in
their user mailbox folder.
- Original Message -
From: vrataj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
We upgraded to 8.1 from 8.05 yesterday on an NT server and have seen the
SMTP service crash every 20 to 30 minutes.
Obviously I can't monitor this every minute so we put together a batch file
to restart the service every 10 minutes.
The batch file has one line:net start imail smtp server
We
Is it possible to set a max message size for each user?
I need some users to send files and big messages. And I need some other to be blocked from
sending attachments and/or big messages.
I know I can set it on the domain level But I need it
to be set on the user level.
Thank you
Upgraded Thursday night ... no problems that I didn't cause (see compose
button thread). My users LOVE the new templates ... they claim faster that
old yellow ones. I've seen no problems with the queue manager and can't say
enough about the new subject line mod ... helps figure why email is
How many virtual hosts are you running?
- Original Message -
From: Ed Butler (49pence) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 7:28 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail performance
We're in the process of evaluating Imail for our users. I'd like to know
what
I am currently running Imail 8.05 HF2, Declude Junkmail and Antivirus on a Compaq
DL380 with a P3 733 with a gig of ram and SCSI Raid array, 7000 users averaging
500,000 inbound emails, counting trapped spam and approximately 30,000 outbound daily
and have no performance issues.
-Original
I'm running IMail in various locations on various platforms with a varying
amount of users and volume. All run well and all are running ASSP on the
same servers. None of the servers are above 500Mhz machines and most have
512 meg. All are Win2000.
The only thing I've ever had an issue with is
Forgot to mention, we are running approximately 70 virtual hosts and 4 IPed hosts as
well.
-Original Message-
From: Richard H. Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 9:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] Upgrade
Upgraded to 8.1 last night with no
I agree with Andrew - hold off. I am seeing too many odd things with IMAP
and LDAP. My IMAP has really slowed down as well now too. In Outlook, when
I Purge Deleted messages, before it took maybe a second. Now it can take
upwards of 10 seconds. I am only purging Imail list messages and maybe
What steps did you use for downgrading? I may consider doing it this
weekend. How difficult was it?
Travis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Gregory Liénard
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 5:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
May want to add the Qm service to that as well. I will do the same.
Travis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Daniels
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 6:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] V8.1
We
Yes, you are not alone with the queue manager crashing.
In the KB it says to double check the registry as to NOT have incorrect IP
keys for the domains, but all I did was upgrade from a well functioning
8.0.5 (I was tempted by improved antispam performance).
My bad luck...
Marcin
-Original
Thanks for the feedback Sandy Serge. Just a couple of follow-up
questions.
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 19:12:59 -0500
From: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Server Migration / Version Upgrade
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What are the chances that I can transfer mail
At the moment the setup we're running is:
2.8ghz P4, 1gb DDR, 80gb 7200rpm HDD: Imail server, running POP3, SMTP,
Webmail, and Queuemgr
2.4ghz P4, 512mb DDR: Running a sending only service.
sounds like it should be able to handle the load, but hot hardware needs to
be configured, and maintained,
I dumped all but user directory and restored everything but users from
backup tapes.
Travis Rabe wrote:
What steps did you use for downgrading? I may consider doing it this
weekend. How difficult was it?
Travis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
I just saw the post about the nested folders, and indeed this seems to have
solved the issue.
I was the only user with a pretty big mail box structure (nested folders,
nearly 4gb of data).
Once I moved the nested folders out of my mail directory (the nested folders
were about 1gb of data), all
I saw a thread on this yesterday, but I had deleted it and it hasn't showed
up in the archives yet - how to I get the logo on the login page to change
to my own logo? I replaced the Ipswitch logo there with my own logo
(logo.gif), but the Ipswitch logo still shows up. When I remove logo.gif
Yep _ I did. In the logs it was saying it could not fine
mail.davdgrp.com.gif. So I made one and then it showed up.
Travis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Smith
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 6:56 AM
To: Imail Forum
Subject:
U have to make a logo called ex : mail.norway.com.gif
Same as Host Name. Do not Delete the Ipswitch logo!
Regards
Roar
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Smith
Sent: 2. april 2004 16:56
To: Imail Forum
Subject: [IMail Forum]
I use Killer webmail templates, but I would think that the rules are
similar.
I saved my logo in the images directory, and gave it the following name:
MAIL.INFOCON.PL-large.gif
My domain is mail.infocon.pl
Marcin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Okay, that fixed it. The weird thing was, that last night from my house the
correct logo showed up. But from within the LAN that the Imail server is
located, the Ipswitch logo still wanted to show up there. Oh well, no
problem anymore.
Scott Smith - IT Manager
Westside Detroit Reprographics
In the classic webmail template, is there any way to skip the welcome screen
that shows up after the user logs in (and then has a timed redirect to the
users account)? I guess if there isn't a way to skip it altogether, is
there a way to change the amount of time that it waits to do the redirect
Delete or rename mailnews.txt in imail\web folder.
---
Vincent Toussaint
Sys. Admin, Hybride
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(450) 227-4245
www.hybride.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Smith
Sent: Friday, April
I am thinking that we should not have a major issue if we upgrade this weekend.
PIII 500+
400+ MB RAM
Not using either LDAP or IMAP (services not running)
30 domains (all with seperate IP - no virtual domains)
309 users
Traffic on 4/1 (pretty typical traffic)
SMTPD Connections = 27938
I search this group and found some info but would like to
find more on how users can get a copy of their email delivered to their Cell
phones
Any info or links would be helpful
Thank you,
Joe Scharbrough
Consulting Engineer
Carolina Connection
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
252-229-5587
We use IMAP here, but no LDAP. The upgrade seems to have done exactly that,
upgraded everything. Better performance all around here. No problems with
the IMAP at all. POP3 works just great too. And the Webmail is way better
than it was before.
Scott Smith - IT Manager
Westside Detroit
Title: Message
read
this:
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-19980119-DD11.htm
I
wouldn't recommend it but you can do it.
Bill
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe
ScharbroughSent: Friday, April 02, 2004 10:44 AMTo:
Hello,
I am having a problem with LDAP queries. I am not very
familiar with LDAP processes, so I may stumble through this:
I am running Imail 7.15 on an HP TC2120 Server, with 1.5Gb
RAM, P4 2.6Ghz, HP Gbit NIC. The only other application running on this server
is Mcafees Webshield
Pretty straight forward: Just install 8.0x (without web etc) and off you go.
Gregory.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe
Sent: vrijdag 2 april 2004 16:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 8.1 Upgrade Question
A copy of ALL their incoming e-mail? That will cause nightmares for some users. If I
send a user who has a foward setup such as:
incoming mail save copy foward copy to cell
and that e-mail has an attachment, I know at least SprintPCS will bounce that message
back to the orginal sender.
I
Title: Nachricht
you need a
gateway to reach the cellphone.
If the users
cellphone is able to get an internetaccess - no problem - its a feature some
telephonecompanies offer.
We do it this
way:
We do access the
mobile network of the Deutsche Telekom viaSMS Cover smtp - sending a
mailvia
Hello Everyone,
I've imported a weeks worth of logs into an sql database in order to do some analysis.
Just as a general overview I'm going to search for...
smtpldeliver
smtprdeliver
pop3logon success
To tell me the local deliveries, remote deliveries, and pop logins. The thing
It's in the log file W1x.log.
You'll find lines looking like this one :
20040323 022818 Auth Logon username xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
Xb80a9b9998cc9e9e93c86aa2627a 81 0.
I thinks this is it...
---
Vincent Toussaint
Sys. Admin, Hybride
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(450) 227-4245
Woops,
I think I got it...
IWEBMSG (2180) Auth Logon
Regards,
Greg Cerveny, Applications Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.webolutions.com http://www.webolutions.com/
1-800-657-6055 | ph: 303-300-2640 | fax: 303-300-2645
6000 E. Evans Avenue, Suite
I run a query using Softerra's LDAP browser in order to discover the
root LDAP folder...
Without delving into any more of the details, suffice it to say that
the ILDAP daemon before version 8.1 (which was just released) was not
really LDAPv3 compliant and presented many similar problems
Here are the error messages:
04:02 08:41 SMTP-(97b3011c00e8229b) ERR mail.davdgrp.com read open fail
(e:\IMAIL\Users\trabe\main.mbx)
04:02 08:41 SMTP-(97b3011c00e8229b) ERR local fail to mail.davdgrp.com
trabe-main (310) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0
04:02 08:41 SMTP-(97b3011c00e8229b) requeuing
So,
I've just ran through my complete logs from the past week of webmail, smtp, and pop3.
I consistently have more logons on tues,wed,thu than I do on monday. But it seems
almost every monday my mail server slows way down to responses that take 1-2 minutes.
I'm thinking I've extracted all the
This means that particular delivery thread could not open the mailbox
because it was in use (another delivery thread, web messaging etc...). This
is normal and also occurs in 8.05. When this happens the message is
requeued for delivery during the next queue run.
Tripp
- Original Message
In my IMAIL setup I have the max mailbox size set to '0' for unlimited for
all my users. But it states the max mailbox size is setup to 10mb when it
should be unlimited. Does anyone know of a reason/fix for this?
Jamie W. Steenberge
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you are trying to find your cell phone email
address check the table at this link.
http://www.tinywords.com/mobile.html#table
Gary
- Original Message -
From:
Joe
Scharbrough
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 9:43
AM
Subject: [IMail Forum]
I've just ran through my complete logs from the past week of webmail,
smtp, and pop3. I consistently have more logons on tues,wed,thu than I do
on monday. But it seems almost every monday my mail server slows way down
to responses that take 1-2 minutes.
Is the CPU load very high during that
Thanks for the explanation Tripp,
I have scanned my logs from January 2004 on and have only 3 occurrences of this
message. Since I upgrade two days ago I have 107 occurrences of this message.
Is there something with the upgrade that I need to set/change that may have gotten
changed during
It's usually around 90-95%. The processes taking up the majority vary,
it's usually between smtp and pop3. Webmail takes up anywhere to 20%.
Regards,
Greg Cerveny, Applications Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.webolutions.com
Is it true that pre-8.1 versions of Imail's SPAM filter did not work on
aliases? And if this is true, does the SPAM filter in 8.1 now work for
aliases?
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
I do not beleive that this is true. We use iMail as a backend component of a website,
and our users receive email ONLY via aliases. The SPAM filter has been working
properly.
-Chase
Network and Systems Engineer
Bullhorn, Inc.
125 B St.
Boston, MA 02127
p. 617.464.2440 ex 119
m.
Do you think I should setup sys mom to track CPU usage over mon,tue,wed
mornings and run a comparison?
It just seems odd to me that I don't have any problems later in the week
when I deliver more messages. The other thing I think is that perhaps
on monday people's download sizes are larger,
I have experienced that my alias gets more Spam than other accounts!
Roar
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase Seibert
Sent: 2. april 2004 19:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] SPAM filtering with 8.1
I do not beleive
Have you looked at any old logs from 8.0X on comparable traffic days to
compare the occurrences? The majority are to two users, trabe and
jrasmussen. Do those users have large mailboxes or large rule files that
could slow the delivery? How much traffic is directed at those users on a
daily
We upgraded our 8.05 install to 8.10 this morning. 15 domains and 70,000+
accounts on a 4 processors system with 2Gb or ram.
At first everything seemed fine, but then the spool started to fill up.
Then the Queue and the SMTP service both started restarting randomly. The
Queue service in
Hey Tripp,
We are pretty much the same for mail traffic during the week days and
non-existent on the weekends - we never go over 2000 (avg 1200 msg/day)
messages a day for all users local delivery. There are no rules for any
users at the server level. I and jrasmussen gat about 50-60 messages
I have experienced that my alias gets more Spam than other accounts!
That really is not scientific. You'll have to do much better if you
want to establish a functional difference.
--Sandy
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a
Is anyone running iMail in a clustered environment? If so, how is it
working for you? Can you describe the cluster configuration?
Currently, we are in the process of migrating 10,000 - 15,000 users from
Microsoft Exchange 2000 to iMail. Are there any utilities out there to
migrate the mail
I am seeing this...and I have a tiny tiny fraction of the mail for delivery
that you have.
Travis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stephan
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 10:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] Upgrade to
I have one domain redharvest.com that only contains aliases! My primary
domain Norway.com has no aliases!
Redharvest.com received 60% more spam than Norway.com
The same spam that the filter has caught on Norway.com goes trough to
redharvest.com
Regards
Roar
-Original Message-
From:
The same spam that the filter has caught on Norway.com goes trough
to redharvest.com
And you have the exact same settings on both virtual hosts regarding
the actions to take on detected spam? Logs?
--Sandy
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Yes !!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman
Sent: 2. april 2004 20:36
To: Hostmaster Online Services AS
Subject: Re[4]: [IMail Forum] SPAM filtering with 8.1
The same spam that the filter has caught on Norway.com goes
Any one knows if there are problems/conflicts with KillerWebMail version
4.02 and the new Imail 8.10 version?
-Luis Arango
__
[Email scanned for viruses by Panda Consulting -www.pandacons.com-]
[Email escaneado contra virus por Panda Consulting -www.pandacons.com-]
To Unsubscribe:
That's awesome, well not for you, but finally someone that has had the same
experiences that I have with respect to the SPAM filter not doing as good a
job on aliases as it should. In fact, I actually find that the SPAM that
gets through to the user even has an x-header that the rules should have
I have collected a number of Spam Emails! And I have set up a staging
environment! I have sent 3000 different Spam mail trough the system to a
different accounts! So this is pretty proven
I hope 8.1 will give us a better day :)
I'll cross my fingers
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Sandy,
I've been through this with you once before so I just want to get some
things strait because it seems that you don't believe what's happening or
you think it's a user error.
1. Do you filter aliases?
2. Do you use x-headers with rules to forward SPAM to a catch-all mailbox
for inspection?
I do all of the things mentioned!
Regards
R
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Remo Pistor
Sent: 2. april 2004 21:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[4]: [IMail Forum] SPAM filtering with 8.1
Sandy,
I've been through this with you
You must modify the config_MailBoxSizeLimitKB.cgi in imail\web
directory.
Edit it with notepad and change the value. It's in Kb. So 10Mb = 1
---
Vincent Toussaint
Sys. Admin, Hybride
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(450) 227-4245
www.hybride.com
-Original Message-
Does the 8.1 anti-spam filter not work for virtual domains?
I see the anti-spam option under the main domain, but not the others.
Its definitely not catching the spam going to the
virtual sites either.
Any help anybody could offer would be appreciated.
Regards,
Roland
Considering when everyone sounded like a kid in a candy store on Wednesday
and asked who will be the first to install Version 8.1? and NO ONE SAID I
HAVE IT INSTALLED AS A BETA TESTER AND EVERYTHING WORKS EXACTLY AS THEY ARE
SUPPOSED TO WITH NO ERRORS ON MY SYSTEM SENDING AND RECEIVING 5,000,000
I've been through this with you once before so I just want to get
some things strait because it seems that you don't believe what's
happening or you think it's a user error.
Frankly, we use Declude, so it's certainly _not_ that I have full
faith in the built-in anti-spam features.
Luis,
The Killer WebMail 4.02 templates will continue to function, but you will
not have access to the new features through Web Messaging. Download
notifications for the update to Killer WebMail 4.03 are in the process of
being sent out. 4.03 just makes the functionality in 8.10 available to
Richard,
This issue is not addressed in 8.10. Currently, I do not have a schedule
for this fix. The best information I can provide is that we are aware of
the problem and it will be evaluated and prioritized.
John Korsak
Messaging Product Marketing Manager
- Original Message -
From:
If CPU load is the issue, the first thing to do is go to Task
Manager, click on the Processes tab, and click the CPU
button. That will sort the processes by CPU usage; the
one(s) at top are causing the problem.
Like to think I'm a little bit beyond this :) Over the past 30 minutes
I really like your thoughts about this. But me as responsible
hostmaster, have all this on a staging environment in at least 2-3 weeks
before I implement it! And everyone else should do the same thing! But
that's a matter of cost,,,
R
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Considering when everyone sounded like a kid in a candy store on
Wednesday and asked who will be the first to install Version 8.1?
and NO ONE SAID I HAVE IT INSTALLED AS A BETA TESTER AND EVERYTHING
WORKS EXACTLY AS THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO...
I don't usually find myself agreeing with
So what do you enter to have it show up as unlimited?
Thanks,
Mike
At 01:11 PM 4/2/2004, you wrote:
You must modify the config_MailBoxSizeLimitKB.cgi in imail\web
directory.
Edit it with notepad and change the value. It's in Kb. So 10Mb = 1
---
Vincent
The Killer WebMail 4.02 templates will continue to function,
but you will not have access to the new features through Web
Messaging. Download notifications for the update to Killer
WebMail 4.03 are in the process of being sent out. 4.03 just
makes the functionality in 8.10 available to
0 = unlimited
Check this link ... :
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/KW-20020930-DM16.htm
It says it's for KWM but works the same for CWM template...
It worked for me ;)
---
Vincent Toussaint
Sys. Admin, Hybride
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(450) 227-4245
www.hybride.com
is
there an easy way to see if a user has an unusual amount of emails stored in
their inbox, taking room on the server?
Thank you.
Mike
At 02:24 PM 4/2/2004, you wrote:
0 = unlimited
Check this link ... :
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/KW-20020930-DM16.htm
It says it's for KWM but works the same for CWM template...
It worked for me ;)
---
Vincent Toussaint
Sys. Admin, Hybride
Unlimited mailbox size was what I had running on 8.05, when I installed 8.10
it changed it to 10mb.
IS THIS why SMPT keeps crashing (related to a queuemgr problem)?
I've changed my settings to unlimited, hopefully my problem (and maybe
yours) is solved.
-Bill
William E. Daniels
Director of
your email was caught by Outlook Junk Mail settings :)
Sorry I'm laughing now ... He He He... I guess this is a really BIG question
to answer ,,, But I'll hope my spam situation will be better
R
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford
Can zip up and send me the log off list so I can have a look?
Tripp
- Original Message -
From: Travis Rabe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 1:08 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Mail stopped again in v98.1 after upggrade
Hey Tripp,
We are pretty much
I really don't think this is related to SMTP problems. It's been
changed because it's in the WebMail template.
I'm not even sure if it's really working as quota... I have user with
mailbox bigger than 300Mb. They were receiving the warning message at
logon but they could still receive/send new
For the last two or three days we've been nailed heavily by dictionary
attacks. We've got a new server for IMail, but it's kicking the crap out of
our secondary mail server running the IIS SMTP server. Has anybody else
seen an increase in such activity, and is there anything else I can do about
Via Imail console you can see every users
mailbox size and number of messages. (directory tab)
For more info take a look:
http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/guide/imailug801/Chapter%203usermail3.html
-Luis
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Thanks, I have seen this, but we have over 800 accounts and I was hoping
to see at a glance if one or more had a large number of messages in
it.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Panda
Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto ArangoSent:
John, thank you very much.. your answer was very clear. I'll let you know if
I don't receive the email you mentioned
Luis Arango
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Korsak
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 2:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, the webmail template doesn't actually work as a quota - if you actually
have a 50MB limit, then you would have to set the webmail template
separately in order to have that same 50MB limit appear the user. It's
really only a statistic (as far as I could see anyway). I noticed it on my
account
I think I found the glitch.
Normally when I update the phrse-list or URL list, I restart the Queue
Manager service. For some reason, after I do this mail stop flowing until I
restart the SMTP service as well. Well, actually I restarted both a second
time and everything started flowing again.
Rick,
IMail Server 8.10 does not come with Killer WebMail. Killer WebMail will
continue to be an add-on product. IMail Server's default templates are now
what was formerly known as Classic WebMail.
If you are running Killer WebMail with IMail Server 8.05 you would be
running Killer WebMail
No, that's strange. Are you updating the files manually? I've got your log
and I'll take a look and let you know what I see.
Tripp
- Original Message -
From: Travis Rabe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 4:43 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Mail
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
