We are seeing the same thing as others have reported.
Outlook 98 users checking mail does not get their mail without having to use
the web interface to delete mail in their mail box.
This does not happen all the time but enough time for them to consider
leaving us for someone that does not use I
rrect including the password.
But when you try to log on to check your mail it
gets rejected. Saying that the user or password is not
correct.
We check spellings etc. but can not see what we did
wrong.
Any suggestions on how to solve this?
Thanks
Heimir Eidskrem
i360 Inc.
We have yet to get this working and would be
grateful for any help.
Thanks,
Heimir
- Original Message -
From:
Heimir Eidskrem
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2000 6:20 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail 6.03 &
MS SQL 7.0
We are tryin
I have one user that receives another users email.
Both users are on the imail 6.6 system but in different domains and
different email accounts.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gets [EMAIL PROTECTED] email.
This only happens sometimes.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/su
Nope, I have checked that.
No rules even refer to the two accounts.
At 10:56 AM 5/17/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>Rules!
>
>Daniel Donnelly
>
>
>- Original Message -----
>From: "Heimir Eidskrem" <[EMAIL
First impression after downloading Imail 7.0 is that I am not impressed.
I do not see many new features or any really improvements.
The biggest one for our users is probably the spell checker.
I think Ipswitch needs to listen to the users on this list.
Many requests for features and improvemen
Anyone seen this?
Our mail server is running fine but lately we are having problems with a
few domains not being able to send mail. They get an error as soon as they
hit the send button. It has only been a couple of domains (we have
many). If I restart the smtp service it goes away for a wh
I installed Declude Anti Virus last night and have caught 53 since then.
Declude ROCKS, just what we needed. Very easy to install and configure.
At 02:08 PM 7/23/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>I'm running Declude Virus on iMail 7.Xand have caught 20 infected files
>today so far... is everybody gett
On one of the domains we are hosting today when they try to use the web
mail they get message "user account suspended".
This is when you go to the log in screen, before you log in.
If I restart the web mail it works fine for a while, but it has happened
twice in the last hour.
Any suggestions?
When open the "view Queue" from the IMail administrator and try to remove
an item in the queue it does not delete it. But if I use the "remove all"
button it works fine.
Is this a know bug or just me?
Thanks,
Heimir
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be r
ver
>does intruder lockout, but I'm new to IMail so perhaps IMAP does it too.)
>
>-Josh
>
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Heimir Eidskrem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 12:36 PM
>Subject:
I am running both Declude Antivirus and Junkmail.
Works great - both of them, very pleased.
Price is very affordable, not sure what Webshield costs but from my
recollection it is much more than Declude.
Also the support from Scott is outstanding.
I highly recommend Declude.
H.
At 11:46 AM
I am also having a problem with the "mx connect fails" to msn.com,
Any suggestions?
H.
At 02:03 PM 8/29/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>I have the same problem and resorted to forwarding to a non IMail server for
>processing. It isn't msn or DNS because the other server consults the same
>DNS server
I understand what you are saying and I do agree to a certain point.
We did turn HOLD on spamcop and caught over 4000 spam emails in a short
period. Out of the 4000 only 6 were legit (as far as we know).
I think all blacklists needs to remove IP addresses fast when notified that
the problem is
One of my clients do get server time outs on a few computers when they
check mail.
Mail works for them, they can send and receive mail but annoyingly many
times during the day they get the "server timed out" message.
This only applies to 3 out of 9 computers in the same office using the same
I while back I did find a utility to extract users from the registry to
create a mail list. It was windows based.
I did look @ Ipswitchs page did not find it there.
Could someone point me in the right direction please.
Thanks,
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.ht
Please, Scott deserves every good word people have to say about him and
Declude.
He is a stand up guy and strives very hard to support his clients.
Heimir
At 11:04 AM 5/17/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>I ended up buying Declude just to handle Klez, and it was worth every
>penny. I hate to sound li
Same thing happened here also.
Not sure why or how to fix it.
H.
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Ulrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 4:19 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum] HELP - Bizarre Screen in Administrator program
> I'm running 7.06
Hello everybody,
One of my clients can download email quick
with no problems but when they are sending mail it is extremely
slow.
4 minutes to send an email with an attachment of
only 85K, they are connected using 128 ISDN. When they try to send to
another Imail server with a differen
I am not sure how BlackIce would help in a dictionary attack?
Could you please elaborate on that?
H.
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Winberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 9:32 AM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] what a pain!
> I used
PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Heimir
> Eidskrem
> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 9:21 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] what a pain!
>
> I am not sure how BlackIce would help in a dictionary attack?
>
> Could you pl
For what it is worth.
In the past we did have "auto-deny possible hack attempts" turned on and it
did prevent users (One large client using Nat) from sending email.
And I am conerend that Blackice will do the same.
H.
- Original Message -
From: "Sanford Whiteman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
Thank your for your reply.
I appreciate the information.
H.
- Original Message -
From: "Smart Business Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Heimir Eidskrem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] what a
One of my customers called and told us that several
emails from a certain individual is missing.
When I looked in the log files I noticed that the
connection gets established but the next line I find for the process reads
Idle timeout
I did a search in the archives and found that
some
This is from two mails today as you can
see.
06:06 09:58 SMTPD(0C640070) [209.196.77.107] EHLO
mx10.airmail.net06:06 09:58 SMTPD(0C640070) [209.196.77.107] MAIL
FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>06:06 09:58
SMTPD(0C640070) [209.196.77.107] RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>06:06 10:42
SMTPD(0C640070)
This is from two mails today as you can
see.
06:06 09:58 SMTPD(0C640070) [209.196.77.107] EHLO
mx10.airmail.net06:06 09:58 SMTPD(0C640070) [209.196.77.107] MAIL
FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>06:06 09:58
SMTPD(0C640070) [209.196.77.107] RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>06:06 10:42
SMTPD(0C640070)
For some strange reason after upgrading to 6.0, one of my domains don’t
see the icons after they log on using the webmail.
IE. You log on, then you
don’t see any of the icons but you can see the missing images (frame with red
x).
So far I only know of one domain with this problem.
In Imail 5.0 we had the user account manager program. Very easy to use adding new users. Start it up, select domain then just
hit enter to add a new user.
Don’t see the same functionality in 6.0, is it still there and I am just missing it ?
Heimir Eidskrem
Westside
Darrell,
Do you care to elaborate more about this.
I would like to do the same thing.
Heimir
- Original Message -
From: "Darrell L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:47 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] SMTP Log/volume
I do not get any results but 0.
I tried several different way but no luck.
I know my mrtg is running correctly since I am monitoring other devices.
Anyone else got this to work?
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Leske" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 21
Declude is the easiest program to setup.
If your "engineers" did have problems setting it up, you might consider
finding a teenager with just a little bit of computer skills because he can
probably do it in a few minutes.
I have used several junkmail programs for a couple of platforms and Declude
You have 30 days to register.
I did this myself a few weeks ago with no problems.
1. installed imail on the new server.
2. stopped imail on old server.
3. exported registry key.
4. copied user directories from old to new server.
5. imported registry key.
6. shut down old mail server.
7 restarted
Running Imail 8.21 with Declude.
For the last few days SMTPD32 stops responding.
You don't get rejected when trying send, it accepts the connection but
never completes it.
Almost like its tarpitting itself.
Also, at that time the process is large like over 150mb.
When this happens nothing is r
Rick Klinge wrote:
Running Imail 8.21 with Declude.
For the last few days SMTPD32 stops responding.
You don't get rejected when trying send, it accepts the
connection but
never completes it.
Almost like its tarpitting itself.
Also, at that time the process is large like over 150mb.
When thi
Not only that but the product has not evolved much in the last few years.
We paid for an SA for years without really getting much from it.
User interfaces and functionality has pretty much been the same for
years now.
Admin functions the same.
The "engine" has change a little.
Bruce Barnes
I found about thousands of entires like this one in our log files.
11:22 18:32 SMTPD(7b1d01d03166) [70.60.177.246] NOTIMPL
I can not find any info regarding what it means.
Any ideas?
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.
Len Conrad wrote:
I found about thousands of entires like this one in our log files.
11:22 18:32 SMTPD(7b1d01d03166) [70.60.177.246] NOTIMPL
(SMTP protocol feature) NOT IMPLemented
Len
Thanks Len,
Do you know what could cause this message?
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com
It might work fine but its pretty sad if you have to set up redirects.
In our case we have to setup over 130.
This is an issue Ipswitch should have thought about before they released
this version.
Nothing is harder then retraining users.
H.
Anthony Polselli wrote:
That's what we did and
Yeah a 23mb bug fix for a program that is 23mb.
Something must be wrong here.
To fix smtp and imap we are downloading 23mb?
H.
Martin Schaible wrote:
Hi Greg,
8.22 is a bugfix, not a major release. Your Key will work. A key might change,
if your are updating a major release (I guess)...
Ipswitch 2006 is so awesome you want to switch to a competitor :)
H.
dkaleky wrote:
Great improvement. Great support.
Please give the function to know IP address of webmail users, so declude
hijack will work-
Otherwise it is smartermail for me at end of my support contract.
dk
To Un
Travis Rabe wrote:
Would someone mind creating one of these with version 8.22 and sending
it to me to see if it will work?
I need the following in the list:
192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0
207.228.46.64 255.255.255.224
64.169.12.25 255.255.255.248
Thanks!
T
File emailed.
C
Not to start another bitching thread but this is pretty bad.
2006 is obviously not ready for release.
I feel deceived by Ipswitch.
When I was told that 2006 would be out November 28 I had already planned
to go to Smartermail but seeing Ipswitch getting their version out first
we did pay for a s
Edward Ford wrote:
Which Antispam programs are worth recommending to use with IMail? The
IMail antispam filters are not working good enough.
Thank You;
Eddie
Declude, we use it for both spam and virus.
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: htt
You are right.
If Ipswitch dont do the right thing here it will be ugly.
H.
Richard Bowman wrote:
HM... now here is a question... I just paid good money for a license for
the 2006 product, that apparently isn't working yet... The thoughts that
cross my mind are that sooner then later t
Here i my take on this.
1. Ipswitch released a product that was not even close to be ready. I
posted my theory on why before.
2. I renewed my service agreement with Ipswitch because the early
release, had already planned to go with Smartermail.
3. I have now paid for several months of service ag
John T (Lists) wrote:
1. Ipswitch released a product that was not even close to be ready. I
posted my theory on why before.
While many believe this, it is not true. There were many companies
participating in the beta, and even though I did not run the beta (only
because of time) I was moni
And that makes Imail worthless to many if they cant send email to one of
the largest broadband providers in the country.
I consider this a critical error that must be fixed asap.
H.
Website World wrote:
No they blacklist the entire mail server's IP address and then nobody
can send email to a
Website World wrote:
If you are using Imail 8.05, what's the least expensive way to deal
with spam?
Mike
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/
Can anyone else confirm this?
H.
Matrosity Hosting wrote:
I would say if you're users are NOT using web messaging to go for it.
Since the new web messaging was the sole reason we decided to stay
with Imail we are VERY disappointed in its performance. It's basically
a Lexus with a Yugo engine
So far its not good news for 2006.
Actually I think its a disgrace.
Who runs 2006 and are happy with the web performance and overall trouble
free install?
Brian Hruska wrote:
So what is CURRENT conceusus with the 2006 release? Does it work well
enough to upgrade to yet?
To Unsubscribe:
Will Ipswitch extend our service contract for 3 months due to the 2006
fiasco?
I think thats the least they can do since they have not had a usable
product.
H
Matrosity Hosting wrote:
From what I saw of .03 it's a LOT faster. I can't vouch for much more
than that since it's not running on
Que manager died several times today.
Its not the first time, it happened earlier this week.
The status when you look at services is that the quemanager is stopping.
It never stops and you have to kill the process in task manager.
I found several ERR 005 error in the log files.
04:23 15:32 SMTP
The queue manager in 2006 is that the same version as in 8.22?
The queue manager has been broken since version 8.21.
It seems that 2006 is finally ready for usage.
H.
Kevin Gillis wrote:
Hello Shaun,
IMail 2006.04 went "gold" yesterday. We are notifying partners and
releasing to public tomo
Find the corresponding log file lines.
I had the same problem and according to tech support its related to DNS
data.
If its the same problem that I have (the log files will give you an
error number) then its no fix for it.
But you can put the problem domain name in your host file so you bypass
My quote would be 9 billion dollars.
Can anyone top that one :)
Ravi Reddy wrote:
Isreal,
The Allen university wants Rackmount servers only. They do not have space fir
Tower servers. We need to get the Rack mount 1850 with the same configuration.
Please send a quote with SATA raid and Sc
Martin Schaible wrote:
Hi,
We are waiting too ;-)
I think, this upcoming release will have tons of bugs fixed. Ipswitch had now a lot of
time (some "men years" i guess) to write and fix code.
Am Freitag, 21. Juli 2006 um 00:04 schrieben Sie:
C
Spaminator wrote:
Any updates on the release date for 2006.1?
Many of us are anxious. I've been delaying an upgrade from 8.15hf2 for a long
time, and I'd like to put these headaches behind me (crashing queue manager,
runaway proc utilization by the webmail service, etc.).
Thanks!
To Unsubsc
If its mission critical and you have a valid SA why are you not running
the updated software that contains the fix for this?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last week I sent an email to support requesting some information about
upgrading to mitigate the security risk with the SMTP service.
Yesterda
But the Imail server will accept the message then reject it when its too
large.
So the gentleman that reports that he saw a 270mb message could not
prevent the user from sending it to his imail server.
Is this correct?
David Gregg wrote:
I just caught an inbound email that was 270 MB's in the
Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have not migrated to 2006 yet - I knew in the first release the security
issue existed with the IUSR account. This really still exists even in the
latest versions where the IUSR account must have FULL CONTROL? As everyone
knows that's ridiculous.
Has any
Several times now we have experienced a strange problem we cant track down.
Our mail server (8.22) will not send emails. It will receive the emails
(we use Declude) scan it then put it in the spool folder.
When you look in the log files you see entries where it could not
connect to other mail s
able to telnet your local IP and if so, what answers?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir
Eidskrem
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 4:10 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Odd outgoing smtp problem
Here we go again.
Not the first time I have reported this.
Quemanager goes into "stopping" mode but will never stop.
You have to kill the process and restart it for it to work.
And of course thousands of emails build up in the que, mad customers
calling, etc.
So now Ipswitch, tell me again to
Doug Traylor wrote:
Quemanager goes into "stopping" mode but will never stop.
You have to kill the process and restart it for it to work.
How about fixing this problem once for all.
I have a similar problem with 8.22 and a certain mail which kills
SMTPd32 -
Only the first line of the he
Matti Haack wrote:
HE> Are you telling us that we need to install a 3rd party application to
HE> make Imail run stable?
I think beside the small bugs in Imail, there are lot of essential
parts missing (or very basic) which have to be added by third Party products
(Mail-Flow monitoring, Anti-Spam,
he current version.
You can't have bluethooth in your car unless it came with it or you buy a
new one. Same logic.
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir Eidskrem
Sent: Frid
?
Tripp Allen wrote:
Do you have a copy of this message that causing the Queue manager to stop?
Could I see it and the log for when it crashes?
Tripp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir Eidskrem
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 11:00 AM
To
Pere.
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de Heimir Eidskrem
Enviado el: viernes, 15 de diciembre de 2006 16:11
Para: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Asunto: Re: [IMail Forum] Quemanager hanging again
Doug Traylor wrote:
Quemanager goes into &quo
for mail servers :o
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de Heimir Eidskrem
Enviado el: viernes, 15 de diciembre de 2006 17:37
Para: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Asunto: Re: [IMail Forum] Quemanager hanging again
Thank you for the suggesti
the
step count is not enough, we need the actual message and sometimes a
copy of the configuration so we can duplicate the error.
Tripp
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Heimir
Eidsk
Travis W. Rabe wrote:
I had a locked up QM. The service was in the stopping state. I
killed the process and started the service and it stopped instantly.
I pulled out all messages in the spool folder and the service started
right up. I now have a lot of files, and they seem to be paried u
Martin Schaible wrote:
I will share these batch scripts with you guys, but i have to review
everthing and write a small readme. I hope, i will find the time to do this
in between the next fews weeks.
In fact, the scripts are using a bit of reg.exe, robocopy and two scheduled
tasks, so it isn't a
Why do I see this in the log files
01:04 17:03 SMTP-(879b02420df4) [Att-Blk] ERR: Unable to find
Attachment Blocking Host Info for deepspace.i360.net
I have changed the attachment blocking setting from current host to none
but it seems that the setting will always revert to current host.
We have tons of godaddy domains that we own and control for our customers.
Never had one problem with godaddy solicitation and no bad reports either.
Please explain what kind of problems you ran into.
Matrosity Tech Support wrote:
We'll be moving away from godaddy due to their solicitation o
receiving emails from GoDaddy
advertising hosting services. You may have been lucky and not had any
jump ship yet.
Darin.
- Original Message -
*From:* Heimir Eidskrem <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*To:* Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
<mailto:Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.co
Running 8.22 with killerwebmail templates.
Now we have a few clients that is reporting "error in tag execution"
when they log in.
The error is located in the main mail window at the top right above
where it says "Inbox (540 messages).
Any idea on how to fix that?
To Unsubscribe: http://www.i
Heimir Eidskrem wrote:
Running 8.22 with killerwebmail templates.
Now we have a few clients that is reporting "error in tag execution"
when they log in.
The error is located in the main mail window at the top right above
where it says "Inbox (540 messages).
Any idea on how t
that I don't offer.
Matt
Darin Cox wrote:
We get them where we are the registrant. About once a month.
Darin.
- Original Message -
*From:* Heimir Eidskrem <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*To:* Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
<mailto:Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com&
I think my contract might have expired by then.
I bought over a year ago and never used it yet.
Do you think I will extend that contract or buy a cheaper alternative
like Smartermail?
I
Grant Griffith wrote:
I had thought public release was February? Why the change? I am not
comfortable g
I am very unhappy with how Ipswitch did the 2006 thing but I think Kevin
is doing a hell of a job for us.
We will probably not stay with Imail but we stayed in the game this long
because of Kevin.
He is very likable and very professional.
Thank you Kevin for all your help.
Darin Cox wrote:
I
I have a client that is trying to send mail to a domain.
Our server is trying to his the A record for that domain and not the MX
record.
Any idea why and now to fix this?
Here is the info about the domain from DNSSTUFF
3partners.biz.NSIN7200DNS2.DEDICATEDNS.COM.
3partners.biz.
+ 84676402:15 12:30 SMTPD(a6dd019a5503) [0.0.0.0] connect
216.255.xx.17 port 48258
+ 84676502:15 12:30 SMTPD(a6dd019a5503) [216.255.xx.17] EHLO
kodg383193.msp.removed.com
+ 84676602:15 12:30 SMTPD(a6dd019a5503) [216.255.xx.17] MAIL
FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ 84676702:
anything in the Imail log after the "performing antispam checks"
line.
Dean
On 2/15/07, Heimir Eidskrem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+ 84676402:15 12:30 SMTPD(a6dd019a5503) [0.0.0.0] connect
216.255.xx.17 port 48258
+ 84676502:15 12:30 SMTPD(a6dd019a5503) [216.255.xx.17]
John T (lists) wrote:
I and others have be patiently working on this problem and providing
Ipswitch with information on what we have done.
Unfortunately, a good amount of the work I have been doing
troubleshooting with one user is now narrowed down to locally on her
computer.
What i
I have been waiting since I paid my support fees in November of 2005 and
I think maybe that my contract may have expired by now.
When will Imail 2006 be ready with no bugs for usage.
There are several warnings on this list about upgrading to 2006.2 on
high usage servers.
When will all issues
Jimm Wetherbee wrote:
Chuck,
The easiest work-around is to compose a long message on a word processor
and then copy and paste missive into the message (after just logging on,
of course). It's a kludge to be sure, but there is only so long you can
make the time out before you then have to increa
Nick Baggarly wrote:
Can anyone tell me why our Imail Server is unable to deliver to
earthlink recipients? They think I'm spam but I've checked our server
on the and we're not exposed.
I'm running 2006.1. Here's what I get. Thanks in advance.
undeliverable to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Could someone explain why a receiving mail server would reject email
from and saying its not configured to relay?
Could it be that the recipient account is being forwarded?
This is the log file.
2:08 12:19 SMTP-(07C4) Trying mma.com.ve (0)
12:08 12:19 SMTP-(07C4) Connect mma.com.ve
R. Scott Perry wrote:
Could someone explain why a receiving mail server would reject email
from and saying its not configured to relay?
Could it be that the recipient account is being forwarded?
It could be anything.
http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
confirms what you are seeing.
Hello there,
A few question about the report from the log analyzer.
Remote delivery size (Sending domain)
This should show the bytes and messages for the sending domain, so when
I see one of mine it will be the amount of emails sent, correct?
Local delivery size (recipient domain).
This should sh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir Eidskrem
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 2:57 PM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Logreport question
Hello there,
A few question about the report from the log analyzer.
Remote
How do you delete a contact from your contact list in Killer webmail.
I can not find any way to do so?
H.
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support
a few people reported that Outlook 2003 will download emails multiple times.
Its like it never completes the download and every times you restart
Outlook 2003 it downloads again.
Anyone else seen this?
Suggestions on how to fix.
Thanks,
H.
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-l
Maybe because he is still using Imail Server, the product that many of
us supported for years.
We do have much invested in the product in both time and money and
personally I want to get as much from out investment as possible.
I guess you did not put a dime in the pot yourself.
Some of us has b
I think it show how little they care about this list and its users.
I think 99% of the users are here only for IMail server and not the ICS
or whatever its called.
Just another reason we have planned to leave Imail.
H
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't believe that someone at IPSWITCH can't get the
Que manager has been crashing all day.
Even with less then 150 files in the spool directory.
I had it set to auto restart but that made it worse and I had to restart
the server to make it work again.
Any suggestions on how to troubleshoot a quemanager problem?
Imail 8.15 with the latest fix
Declu
Dino Zolezzi wrote:
Hi:
We have almost 25,000 mails storage in the spool directory. The server
is not sending or receiving mails automatically. We have to do it
manually with the spool management. We restart the server and starts
working fine but after 3 or 4 hours stops sending and receiving
I really don't understand why Ipswitch did not make this function work a
little better.
Just dropping the connection seems to be lazy on their part.
They could have made this function better while at it.
H.
Matrosity Tech Support wrote:
no period of time so they can simply open another connec
I am sorry but I disagree.
This has been requested for a long time and this is a common feature in
many programs.
Ipswitch decide in the last minute to add it, I think that show where
their focus has been.
ICS and not Imail server.
Dev wrote:
In Ipswitch's defense, I went on a rant abou
Doug Traylor wrote:
Agreed, you can put an IMGate box on a small server for a couple
hundred dollars
and let it handle outbound as well to keep the load off of a busy
IMail box...
And, you could put ASSP on that same server as Imail and greatly
reduce the Imail load. This however would requi
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
