Re: java support on mips 64bit processor

2007-05-10 Thread POWER architecture PowerPC
I think the only chance to get Java for mips Linux is the other Opensource Java called "kaffe". Try compiling the source for Kaffe (from http://www.kaffe.org). They have mips-Linux as a supported platform in the sourcecode tree. Whether it's fully supported and 64bit i dont know. You will also nee

Re: Java and SableVM - fixed

2006-11-24 Thread Daniel L. McGrew
I fixed it... Not sure how I fixed it or why it's working now... I know that I d/l'd from the top most link at the sun-java page and installed it. Linux RPM (self-extracting file) (filesize: 15.74 MB) That didn't work... I d/l'd from the second link ... Linux (self-extracting file) (filesize: 1

Re: Java on linux Sparc, is there a light at the end of the tunnel ?

2006-05-09 Thread Juergen Kreileder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 03:23:16PM +0200, Juergen Kreileder wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had a look at the sources and I was able to build them on my x86 machine. The port seems to be possible. I even think that the blackdown java team has already done it. Yes an

Re: Java on linux Sparc, is there a light at the end of the tunnel ?

2006-05-09 Thread seb
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 03:23:16PM +0200, Juergen Kreileder wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >I had a look at the sources and I was able to build them on my x86 > >machine. > > > >The port seems to be possible. I even think that the blackdown java team > >has already done it. > > Yes and it's m

Re: Java on linux Sparc, is there a light at the end of the tunnel ?

2006-05-09 Thread Juergen Kreileder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to run the only 1.4 jdk released for the linux sparc arch. Unfortunately, the only version available for sparc is the 1.4.1 which began to broke around the availability of the glibc 2.3.6. Now, some bug have been filed against this but noone ever responded to

Re: java socket not closing

2005-03-22 Thread Nathan Bryant
Remember that a socket isn't closed until both stream directions are shut down. It kinda looks like the remote end has either become unreachable or isn't implementing TCP active close properly. You're sending data which it is not ACKing, and it's not sending an RST either. It may be stuck for s

Re: Java app

2005-01-11 Thread Rikard Froberg
Marek Pawinski wrote: Hi I am trying to install a app which uses java during the installation process. I get this error : ./setup.bin "Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/zerog/lax/LAX" Java looks for the com.zerog.lax.LAX class, so it must be within reach for the runt

Re: Java Platform on Linux

2004-08-22 Thread Tom Wesley
On Saturday 21 August 2004 21:38, Dave Barker-Plummer wrote: > We are beginning to port our Java application to Linux and want to > ensure that we are testing on a configuration that is sufficiently > "typical" to maximize our chances that it will run for our users. My > assumption is that we will

Re: java plugin on EM64t + RH 3.0 U3 beta

2004-08-17 Thread Juergen Kreileder
Sam Varshavchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Keith Poirier writes: > >> I have RH Update 3 (beta) (also tried on update 2) installed on a >> proliant 360G4 which uses the new Intel EM64T chip. I installed >> jre-1_5_0-beta2-linux-amd64.rpm from Blackdown.org but when I link >> to the java plugin,

Re: java plugin on EM64t + RH 3.0 U3 beta

2004-08-17 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Keith Poirier writes: I have RH Update 3 (beta) (also tried on update 2) installed on a proliant 360G4 which uses the new Intel EM64T chip. I installed jre-1_5_0-beta2-linux-amd64.rpm from Blackdown.org but when I link to the java plugin, and access a java app via mozilla it crashes: Intel's EM64

Re: java on linux-arm

2004-03-24 Thread Jean-Sebastien Bettez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On March 13, 2004 15:02, Jean-Sebastien Bettez wrote: > Hello, > is there a porting plan for jdk 1.4 and/or jdk 1.5 on linux/arm? > > seeya! It look like there's no one working on this project. We would like to do the jdk1.5 arm port. Do we have to

Réf. : Re: Java and JNI in Linux

2004-03-18 Thread BRUGAT Didier
Thank for your response, but i found the solution : all is ok with the jdk1.4.2_04 instead of jdk1.4.1 !!! Dirk Weigenand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 18/03/2004 15:32                 Pour :        BRUGAT Didier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>         cc :                 Objet :        Re: Jav

Re: Java thread performance

2002-11-20 Thread Narendra Sankar
I am actually running gentoo linux with glibc 2.3.1 which does not have the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL option. From what I know, this forces glibc 2.1.3 (on Redhat) to be used. However gentoo does not support this from what I can tell. The system breaks when this variable is used. On a performance note, I

Re: Java thread performance

2002-11-20 Thread Marco Trevisan
Hi, Remember that IBM-jvm needs the following environment variable: LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 You could try this and see if page faults continue arising. Regards, Marco Trevisan Narendra Sankar wrote: hi I ran a very simple thread creation benchmark on various vms to find out how useful my

Re: Java Performance

2002-11-07 Thread Matt Avery
I would be more than happy to help with builds of the Blackdown JVM. What do we have to do to get CVS access? Narendra Sankar wrote: Hi Everyone Since I discovered Jedit, I have been looking into jvm performance, specifically on linux as that is my platform of choice. I love jedit and it has a

Re: Java with ARM does not work

2002-08-20 Thread Wilhelm *Rafial* Fitzpatrick
>I installed Linux on my ipaq and the j2re1.3.1 for ARM in my /home >directory. I set PATH to /home/j2re1.3.1/bin. But there is he >problem: There is no java file in that directory so typing java into >the console brings up “java not found" There should be a file named .java_wrapper in this direc

Re: Java with ARM does not work

2002-08-20 Thread Juergen Kreileder
Heiner Litz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I installed Linux on my ipaq and the j2re1.3.1 for ARM in my /home > directory. I set PATH to /home/j2re1.3.1/bin. But there is he > problem: There is no java file in that directory Your filesystem doesn't understand symlinks, use a real one. J

Re: java and linux fonts

2002-08-09 Thread Barr von Oehsen
Run: xprop -root -remove _MOTIF_DEFAULT_BINDINGS at the prompt and it should take care of the warnings. Barr On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, jordan muscott wrote: > i don't know if this exactly helps - but i have had the same sort of > error messages from time to time. They don't seem fatal ( on my b

Re: java and linux fonts

2002-08-09 Thread jordan muscott
i don't know if this exactly helps - but i have had the same sort of error messages from time to time. They don't seem fatal ( on my box ) ,and IIRC i tracked them down to using a java plugin for mozilla from one JDK, whilst having my PATH set up to use a different JDK elsewhere. Seems a bit wei

Re: Java problem on Linux only

2002-04-13 Thread Timothy Reaves
On Sat, 13 Apr 2002 12:23:33 -0400 (EDT) "Thomas Cowdery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --snip-- > Warning: Cannot convert string " Home,_Key_Begin" to type Virtual > Binding > --snip-- These can be safely ignored; they are just teliing you that they can not bind to particular (hot)key c

Re: Java plugins for Mozilla in Linux

2002-04-05 Thread Walter Logeman
Man Chi Ly, On Sat, 06 Apr 2002 11:13, in Re: Java plugins for Mozilla in Linux, you wrote: > I think I covered all bases in this lengthy response. :-) And i appreciate it very much, thank you. I went ahead and did the .rpm.bin thing and it all worked marvelously. Mozilla has its plu

Re: Java plugins for Mozilla in Linux

2002-04-05 Thread Walter Logeman
Mark Christiaens, On Fri, 05 Apr 2002 20:02, in Re: Java plugins for Mozilla in Linux, you wrote: > This runs the demo that is stored in the Java2Demo.jar file.  It > should come up in a matter of seconds.  If this works properly, > everything is probably ok since this is a fairl

Re: Java plugins for Mozilla in Linux

2002-04-05 Thread Walter Logeman
Olivier Rossel, On Fri, 05 Apr 2002 20:59, in Re: Java plugins for Mozilla in Linux, you wrote: > My piece of advice would be: > do not use the rpm.bin! > use the .bin. Could you say why? I am new to all this but have also been told to make sure the rpmdatebase remains inform

Re: Java in Mandrake 8.1

2002-04-05 Thread Walter Logeman
Jerome, On Fri, 05 Apr 2002 21:47, in Re: Java in Mandrake 8.1, you wrote: > staroffice is very particular about which java it will use, I > think it insists on 1.1.8.  You can find more about this and > other problems with staroffice on the linux in the staroffice > discussion a

Re: Java in Mandrake 8.1

2002-04-04 Thread Martin Schroeder
On 2002-04-04 15:21:56 -0500, Pierre Neihouser wrote: > Looks like my Red Hat 7.1 system is getting old and I have some catch up to > do. RH doesn't package any Java, just gcj. Best regards Martin -- Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ArtCom GmbH, Grazer St

Re: Java plugins for Mozilla in Linux

2002-04-04 Thread Walter Logeman
Mark Christiaens, On Fri, 05 Apr 2002 18:50, in Re: Java plugins for Mozilla in Linux, you wrote: Thanks for the promt help from the list! > If you have the Sun JDK 1.4.0 installed, the plugin is in: > > /usr/java/j2sdk1.4.0/jre/plugin/i386/ns610/libjavaplugin_oji140.s >o &g

Re: Java plugins for Mozilla in Linux

2002-04-04 Thread Calvin Austin
I recently used JRE 1.4 with netscape 6.2.2 and that worked you can do the same for mozilla too. Download JRE 1.4 if you can (1.3.1 does work too but I've seen a couple of annoying glitches with the default plugin they have) Then do the following, if libjavaplugin_oji does not exist don't worry.

Re: Java in Mandrake 8.1

2002-04-04 Thread Pierre Neihouser
OTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 1:56 PM Subject: RE: Java in Mandrake 8.1 > I beg to differ, > SuSE's 7.3 distro comes with at least 3 jdks. Sun1.3.0, Sun1.1.8, and > IBM1.3.0 Anyone can be ins

RE: Java in Mandrake 8.1

2002-04-04 Thread Duane Kehoe
EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Java in Mandrake 8.1 I can't agree more with you. Distros don't usually install the JDK or JRE, that's a licensing problem I suppose but Sun should do something about this. I mean even Mac OS comes up with the JDK installed !! Now, I thought that jav

Re: Java in Mandrake 8.1

2002-04-04 Thread Elias Assmann
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Pierre Neihouser wrote: > I can't agree more with you. Distros don't usually install the JDK or JRE, > that's a licensing problem I suppose but Sun should do something about this. > I mean even Mac OS comes up with the JDK installed !! Wait a second, I own a copy of SuSE 7.1 (

Re: Java in Mandrake 8.1

2002-04-04 Thread Pierre Neihouser
gt; Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 12:10 PM Subject: Re: Java in Mandrake 8.1 > On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Pierre Neihouser wrote: > > I believe you should look for java all lowercase. Locate is case sensitive > > (afai remember). > Yes it is, and yes he

Re: Java in Mandrake 8.1

2002-04-04 Thread Elias Assmann
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Pierre Neihouser wrote: > I believe you should look for java all lowercase. Locate is case sensitive > (afai remember). Yes it is, and yes he probably should. But why not try `locate -i`, and if that doesn't work you could also try running updatedb (this updates the database lo

Re: Java in Mandrake 8.1

2002-04-04 Thread Pierre Neihouser
I believe you should look for java all lowercase. Locate is case sensitive (afai remember). I don't have my Linux box with me (and I don't have Open Office installed on it anyway), but that would be where I would start... Hope it helps, -- Pierre - Original Message - From: "Walter Log

Re: Java in Mandrake 8.1

2002-04-04 Thread Ingo Rockel
Hi, If you have the download edition of mandrake 8.1 there is no java installed only kaffe which is as far as I know not suitable to use it with StarOffice. For a proper support you should download and install Java2 SDK (either get it from www.blackdown.org or from java.sun.com) Greets,

RE: [Java-Linux] will JRE1.3.1 fit in iPaq 3600?

2002-03-15 Thread Jesse Sarnovsky
won't be able to write to a cramfs partition, but if you're using it for storing the j2re, you wouldn't want to anyway. -Original Message- From: Shuai Liu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 6:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Java-Linux] will

RE: [Java-Linux] will JRE1.3.1 fit in iPaq 3600?

2002-03-14 Thread Shuai Liu
e how to do that or where to find related instruction? Thanks a lot. Shuai >From: "Shuai Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: [Java-Linux] will JRE1.3.1 fit in iPaq 3600? >Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 17:13:42 + > >Hi, Jesse > >Than

RE: [Java-Linux] will JRE1.3.1 fit in iPaq 3600?

2002-03-14 Thread Jesse Sarnovsky
PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 12:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Java-Linux] will JRE1.3.1 fit in iPaq 3600? Hi, Jesse Thank you for the message? But 3800 with 64MB of ROM? Did you mean RAM? Because I found 3800 has only 32MB ROM. Also, I have never used a CF card before

RE: [Java-Linux] will JRE1.3.1 fit in iPaq 3600?

2002-03-14 Thread Shuai Liu
;To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: [Java-Linux] will JRE1.3.1 fit in iPaq 3600? >Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 08:44:59 -0500 > >I wave installed it on a 3800 with 64MB of ROM, but believe it or not, >it leaves plenty of room thanks to jffs2; however, I would recommend >installi

RE: [Java-Linux] will JRE1.3.1 fit in iPaq 3600?

2002-03-14 Thread Jesse Sarnovsky
I wave installed it on a 3800 with 64MB of ROM, but believe it or not, it leaves plenty of room thanks to jffs2; however, I would recommend installing it on a CF card. Try to leave as much room available for other more vital support utilities. Also make sure you install: libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2

Re: java intl. input method on linux

2002-02-12 Thread Stef Epardaud
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 01:47:00PM -0800, Calvin Austin wrote: > The Sun 1.3.1 release was tested with Japanese Redhat 6.2J, are you using > a similar Japanese distribution? I know we have tests with kinput2 and eucJP well, the latest debian, with all the proper encodings and locales installed, a

Re: java, glibc & smallest possible footprint ???

2002-02-04 Thread Edgar Villanueva
You can find gcj http://gcc.gnu.org/java/ You can find towerj http://www.towerj.com/ TowerJ just realeased version 3.8 and it's supposed to have a smaller footprint. (You pay through the nose for it). Michael D. Schleif wrote: >Edgar Villanueva wrote: > >>There are a bunch of ways to do thi

Re: java, glibc & smallest possible footprint ???

2002-02-03 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Ross Mark wrote: > > If you don't need a 1.2 jvm then try Kaffe as last time I tried it > the footprint was <5M. Depending on how much space you have the full > 1.1.8 jre from Blackdown is a fair bit smaller than the 1.2. I didn't find any glibc20 1.1.8 at blackdown.org -- please, point it out

Re: java, glibc & smallest possible footprint ???

2002-02-03 Thread David Brownell
> > gcj is the gcc java compiler. > > I want to investigate this -- do you have any links? I really need to > know how big that new library is. http://gcc.gnu.org/java ... though it's not yet had work done to optimize it for a particularly small footprint. -

Re: java, glibc & smallest possible footprint ???

2002-02-03 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Edgar Villanueva wrote: > > There are a bunch of ways to do this with alot of constraints. > > More details would be required to answer this correctly. > > One way which may work is compiling the java application into native > code with gcj. > > gcj is the gcc java compiler. > > There are so

Re: java, glibc & smallest possible footprint ???

2002-02-03 Thread Edgar Villanueva
There are a bunch of ways to do this with alot of constraints. More details would be required to answer this correctly. One way which may work is compiling the java application into native code with gcj. gcj is the gcc java compiler. There are some issues with this. gcj requires a library j

Re: Java 3D crashes when i close the window - FIXED :)

2001-12-24 Thread Eryk Furman
Thanks Nathan, I managed to upgrade to an official Mesa library (this was mentioned in the README-Java3D) and also used the newest ver 4.0.1. Not sure why it didnt work the first time. But it works now. :) Happy Holidays to all ... -Eryk >A note I found in the Flightgear-users archive su

Re: Java 3D crashes when i close the window - Please Help

2001-12-24 Thread Nathan Meyers
On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 10:19:59AM -0800, Eryk Furman wrote: > Hi all this is my first post, I just started developing Java under Linux, cuz >frankly i cant deal > with Microsoft's OS's anymore. I am running Red Hat 7.1, Java 2 jdk1.4 beta 3, >blackdown java3d > 1.3. Im running this on an IBM

Re: Java com port Api

2001-12-21 Thread trentjarvi
On 21 Dec 2001, Jesse Stockall wrote: > On Fri, 2001-12-21 at 14:45, Kunal Bisla wrote: > > Hi ALL, > > Does any body know of an implemantation of java comm > > api for linux > > thanks , > > Kunal > > If you read Sun's FAQ > http://java.sun.com/products/javacomm/javadocs/CommAPI_FAQ.txt >

Re: Java com port Api

2001-12-21 Thread Duane Kehoe
yes I have implemented java comm support on Linux. IBM has a comm package that can be installed and configured rather easily with java 2 all the docs are included and it really only involves copy the right jars into the right places. I know for a fact that SuSE linux ships the IBM comm packa

Re: Java com port Api

2001-12-21 Thread Jesse Stockall
On Fri, 2001-12-21 at 14:45, Kunal Bisla wrote: > Hi ALL, > Does any body know of an implemantation of java comm > api for linux > thanks , > Kunal If you read Sun's FAQ http://java.sun.com/products/javacomm/javadocs/CommAPI_FAQ.txt You will find a reference to http://www.interstice.com/kevi

Re: Java Plugins (both 1.2.2 and 1.3.1).

2001-11-28 Thread Phil Boutros
Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'll test it with the static version. OK, that may be the problem... > IIRC RedHat 6.1 used a different family name for the symbol font. Try: Well, for starters, Calvin Austin supplied me with an updated font.properties file.

Re: Java Plugins (both 1.2.2 and 1.3.1).

2001-11-28 Thread Juergen Kreileder
Phil Boutros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hm, works fine here with "Opera 5.05TP1 for Linux - 20010807 Build >> 030 >> - [5]". Do you use the static or dynamic QT version? > > I use Opera 5.05TP1 for Linux - 20010807 Build 030 - [5], >

Re: Java Plugins (both 1.2.2 and 1.3.1).

2001-11-28 Thread Phil Boutros
Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hm, works fine here with "Opera 5.05TP1 for Linux - 20010807 Build 030 > - [5]". Do you use the static or dynamic QT version? I use Opera 5.05TP1 for Linux - 20010807 Build 030 - [5], also, static version. Calvin Austin is trying

Re: Java Plugins (both 1.2.2 and 1.3.1).

2001-11-27 Thread Juergen Kreileder
Phil Boutros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Is JavaScript enabled in Netscape? > > Well...I feel like a real moron. I didn't see anything that > said that Javascript was supposed to be turned on, and I have it off > 99.9% of the time! I'

Re: Java Plugins (both 1.2.2 and 1.3.1).

2001-11-27 Thread Phil Boutros
Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is JavaScript enabled in Netscape? Well...I feel like a real moron. I didn't see anything that said that Javascript was supposed to be turned on, and I have it off 99.9% of the time! Turning it on solved the problem in Netscape.

Re: Java Plugins (both 1.2.2 and 1.3.1).

2001-11-27 Thread Juergen Kreileder
Phil Boutros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> How did you install the 1.3.1 plugin? With a symlink to >> javaplugin.so? > > Yes. > >> Please set JAVA_PLUGIN_TRACE=1 and send the output you get when >> plugin starts up. > > OK. An

Re: Java Plugins (both 1.2.2 and 1.3.1).

2001-11-27 Thread Phil Boutros
Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How did you install the 1.3.1 plugin? With a symlink to > javaplugin.so? Yes. > Please set JAVA_PLUGIN_TRACE=1 and send the output you get when plugin > starts up. OK. Another person asked me the same thing. Here's what it g

Re: Java Plugins (both 1.2.2 and 1.3.1).

2001-11-27 Thread Juergen Kreileder
Phil Boutros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have tried the blackdown 1.3.1 JRE, 1.2.2 JRE, and the Sun > 1.3.1 JRE, all with corresponding plugins for Netscape (using 4.78). How did you install the 1.3.1 plugin? With a symlink to javaplugin.so? > Now, with version 1.3.1 (either t

Re: Java Language Reference

2001-11-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the best book is Thinking in Java. You can find here http://www.mindview.net/Books/TIJ/ Bye Nicola > Greetings, > I am new to this list and to the Java programming language. As such, I > would like to post my first question. Does anyone know where there might be > an online Language Refe

Re: Java Language Reference

2001-11-06 Thread Anil Kumar
Here it is: http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/ On Tue, 6 Nov 2001, Sage net31 wrote: > Greetings, > I am new to this list and to the Java programming language. As such, I > would like to post my first question. Does anyone know where there might be > an online Language Reference ma

Re: Java Language Reference

2001-11-06 Thread Andreas Micklei
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 10:15:20AM -0500, Sage net31 wrote: > I am not talking about the language specification that is typically offered, > rather, a book(or online manual) that offers a relativley complete > collection of all standard classes and methods. What's wrong with the JavaDoc that ca

Re: Java Plugin in Blackdown JDK 1.3.0 works for which version of mozilla?

2001-10-30 Thread Juergen Kreileder
Man Chi Ly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was curious which version of Mozilla the Java Plugin in Blackdown > JDK 1.3.0 is compatible with. It was written for M18 originally. > This bug shows the behavior with recent Mozilla builds: > > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107295 > >

Re: Java 3D question

2001-10-07 Thread Sina!JKL
PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 7:44 AM Subject: Re: Java 3D question > > On Wednesday 03 October 2001 08:36, Timothy Reaves wrote: > > I have linux Java 3D working on my box. Are there any actual > > applications out there for Java 3D, or just the little d

Re: Java Threads on Linux

2001-10-06 Thread Christopher Smith
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 06:46:52PM -0700, Nathan Meyers wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 06:32:11PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: > > root wrote: > > The 2.4 kernel uses 32 bit process ids, so that shouldn't be a > > problem. Are there other precious resources you're worried about? > > If not, there's

Re: Java 3D question

2001-10-04 Thread Rob Saul
On Wednesday 03 October 2001 08:36, Timothy Reaves wrote: > I have linux Java 3D working on my box. Are there any actual > applications out there for Java 3D, or just the little demos that show > that it works? I believe RoboForge uses Java 3D. Anyone who knows better feel free to correct me.

Re: Java Threads on Linux

2001-10-03 Thread Nathan Meyers
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 06:32:11PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: > root wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 02:22:51PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: > > > Nathan Meyers wrote: > > > > The current Linux implementation of POSIX threads uses the clone() kernel > > > > call for each thread, resulting in a 1-1

Re: Java Threads on Linux

2001-10-03 Thread Nathan Meyers
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 06:50:48AM -0700, Avi Cherry wrote: > At 2:16 PM +0200 10/3/01, Florent Coste wrote: > >I'm not a kernel guru too, > > > >but what know is that : > >java threads are mapped to posix threads (linuxthreads in the glibc). The > >linuxthreads library uses the kernel threads, wh

Re: Java Threads on Linux

2001-10-03 Thread Avi Cherry
At 2:16 PM +0200 10/3/01, Florent Coste wrote: >I'm not a kernel guru too, > >but what know is that : >java threads are mapped to posix threads (linuxthreads in the glibc). The >linuxthreads library uses the kernel threads, which directly map >into a 'process >like' entry in the scheduler. (1-1 m

Re: Java Threads on Linux

2001-10-03 Thread Florent Coste
> In Linux: > Well, I hope to hear it from you guys. ;) ... since it is not in the book > that I have and I am not a kernel guru ... and how is it different between > 2.2 and 2.4. Hello all, I'm not a kernel guru too, but what know is that : java threads are mapped to posix threads (linuxthread

Re: java segfaults on Hello.java

2001-07-26 Thread wyrd
I've seen similar beharvior on a RedHat 7.1 system with a 2.4.2 kernel: [user@system]$ java -version java version "1.3.1" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build Blackdown-1.3.1-FCS) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build Blackdown-1.3.1-FCS, mixed mode) Another ex

Re: java segfaults on Hello.java

2001-07-25 Thread Michael .
This error, incidentally, comes about half the time, running the command line repeatedly. Adding "-Xrs" reduces the occurrence to about 1 out of 10 times (and gives a different PC value, no surprise). Running from jdb, the error doesn't occur at all. Leads me to suspect a bug in java's shutdown c

RE: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-06-18 Thread thanhnam_java
Dear All Have you got the J@Whiz test program for Java 2 Platform? Could you help me having J@Whiz? Thank Nam -Original Message- From: David Brownell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 6:10 AM To: Christopher Smith Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Java

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-06-14 Thread ed phillips
> > > >Chris! > > > > > >I missed your talk at JavaOne, and not just because it was so early in > >the morning. ;-) > > > >I missed the entire conference because I had some important things to > >take care of, i.e. work! > > > >Are you going to post slides from your presentation anywhere? Can you

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-06-14 Thread ed phillips
Christopher Smith wrote: > > On 31 May 2001 06:45:08 +1000, Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote: > > > 4) Use JNI to use Linux's various asynch I/O API's. > > Option 4) is how BEA WebLogic Server does it, ( I think ). They have this > > libmuxer.so ( which is also available for Solaris -- dont know why when

Re: Java equivalent of outportb?

2001-06-09 Thread vijay kukreja
hi all, can anyone tell me if there is a way to trace into source code and find out which class is invoked and which method in various java classes. i don't have documentation of a project which i've been assigned to and need to reverse engineer the classes and then get the various paths from th

Program flow tools (was Re: Java equivalent of outportb?)

2001-06-08 Thread John R MacMillan
|hi all, can anyone tell me if there is a way to trace into source |code and find out which class is invoked and which method in |various java classes. i don't have documentation of a project |which i've been assigned to and need to reverse engineer the |classes and then get the various paths fro

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-06-03 Thread David Brownell
> > I may have missed this ... will this be covering GCJ? > > > > Compiled Java has some nice advantages. Including > > more natural and efficient integration with native code, > > as well as faster startup and the ability to do some > > aggressive ahead-of-time optimizations, and working > > be

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-31 Thread Christopher Smith
On 31 May 2001 16:09:38 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > I may have missed this ... will this be covering GCJ? > > Compiled Java has some nice advantages. Including > more natural and efficient integration with native code, > as well as faster startup and the ability to do some > aggressive ahead-

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-31 Thread David Brownell
I may have missed this ... will this be covering GCJ? Compiled Java has some nice advantages. Including more natural and efficient integration with native code, as well as faster startup and the ability to do some aggressive ahead-of-time optimizations, and working better with standard OS tools

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-31 Thread ed phillips
Christopher Smith wrote: > On 31 May 2001 10:58:08 -0700, ed phillips wrote: > > Thanks for providing this pre-session back and forth. Although I'm excited by > > Probably the only way I can get people to show up for 8:30am (someone at > KeyMedia obviously doesn't like me). > > > the prospects a

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-31 Thread ed phillips
Christopher Smith wrote: > On 31 May 2001 06:45:08 +1000, Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote: > > > 4) Use JNI to use Linux's various asynch I/O API's. > > Option 4) is how BEA WebLogic Server does it, ( I think ). They have this > > libmuxer.so ( which is also available for Solaris -- dont know why when J

Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-31 Thread Thomas Enderes
Hi, will there be anyone involved with the ARM / iPAQ ports around at the JavaOne ? Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-31 Thread Jesus M. Salvo Jr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 31 May 2001 08:24, Christopher Smith wrote: > On 31 May 2001 06:45:08 +1000, Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote: > > > 4) Use JNI to use Linux's various asynch I/O API's. > > > > Option 4) is how BEA WebLogic Server does it, ( I think ). They have this

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-30 Thread Christopher Smith
On 31 May 2001 06:45:08 +1000, Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote: > > 4) Use JNI to use Linux's various asynch I/O API's. > Option 4) is how BEA WebLogic Server does it, ( I think ). They have this > libmuxer.so ( which is also available for Solaris -- dont know why when JVM > for Solaris makes use of sola

Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-30 Thread Jesus M. Salvo Jr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I meant this to be sent to the mailing list, but I selected "Reply" originally instead of "Reply To All" - -- Forwarded Message ------ Subject: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 21:23:46 +1000 Fro

Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-29 Thread Christopher Smith
--On Tuesday, May 29, 2001 21:25:20 -0700 ed phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It might be helpful and may even spawn other suggestions if > you were to flesh out in a post some of the aspects, as you articulate > them, of scaling Java on Linux. Perhaps a kind of pre-BoF statement of > the to

Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-29 Thread ed phillips
Excuse me, It is a session not a BoF, but the question still might be helpful pre-session. Christopher Smith wrote: > --On Tuesday, May 29, 2001 15:01:25 -0700 Nelson Minar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > The Penguin Gets Pumped Up . . . Turning Linux into a High-Powered > > Java Technology-

Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-29 Thread ed phillips
Chris, It might be helpful and may even spawn other suggestions if you were to flesh out in a post some of the aspects, as you articulate them, of scaling Java on Linux. Perhaps a kind of pre-BoF statement of the topic to be discussed? Thanks, Ed Phillips Christopher Smith wrote: > --On Tue

Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-29 Thread Christopher Smith
--On Tuesday, May 29, 2001 15:01:25 -0700 Nelson Minar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Penguin Gets Pumped Up . . . Turning Linux into a High-Powered > Java Technology-Based Application Server > Java/Linux performance talk > http://servlet.java.sun.com/javaone/conf/sessions/934/0-sf2001.jsp

Re: Java on Linux talks at Javaone?

2001-05-23 Thread Juergen Kreileder
On Wed, 23 May 2001, ed phillips wrote: > Is Calvin or anyone else giving any talks on their work to get > the latest JDK and Hotspot going on Linux? > > Calvin sent some intriguing hints about the work he had to do > to get Hotspot performing well on Linux, but I'd like more info > or even docu

Re: Java-Linux on StrongArm

2001-05-05 Thread Charles Forsythe
"Alexander V. Konstantinou" wrote: > > > PocketLinux and Kaffe are free (GPL) software, however non-GPL licenses > > of the PocketLinux Kaffee JVM are available for a fee. Several PDA > > Is that legal? I thought once you GPLed code you cannot offer it under > a different license since it is l

Re: Java-Linux on StrongArm

2001-05-05 Thread Alexander V. Konstantinou
> PocketLinux and Kaffe are free (GPL) software, however non-GPL licenses > of the PocketLinux Kaffee JVM are available for a fee. Several PDA Is that legal? I thought once you GPLed code you cannot offer it under a different license since it is likely to contain third-party contributions? Ale

Re: Java-Linux on StrongArm

2001-05-05 Thread Charles Forsythe
Mike Sprauve wrote: > > Can anyone tell me what the status is of the JDK > running on Linux to the Intel StrongArm. I also need > AWT support of that port I don't know about Blackdown's JDK, but the Kaffe VM is the "real meat" of PocketLinux, which runs on StrongArm devices. You didn't give an

Re: java sound install

2001-04-27 Thread Calvin Austin
I've seen a couple instances of this, almost all are attributed to the sound card driver. If you have sb live cards then there is an open source driver from opensouce.creative.com (driver called emu10k). Otherwise check with the vendors site, until ALSA is complete, opensound.com have probably

RE: java socket port

2001-04-02 Thread Sean Owens
To me, this sounds like the programs you're running aren't really dead. "Address already in use" usually means that some other program has opened a socket on that port. Try something like ps uxwa | fgrep java and see if the processes are still around. If they are then you can kill them using

RE: java socket port

2001-04-02 Thread Benoit Sophie
How do you close your program? If you just "ctrl-c" it, the socket is not closed properly. You need a way to tell the server to stop listening (setting your listening variable to false) and it will be fine. bye, Sophie Benoit -Original Message- From: Zhihong Pan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Java & Multithread

2001-03-21 Thread Peter Schuller
> If I don't call Java all is ok. If I call Java (my simple "Hello Word" > Java class) the application exits with "segmentation fault" after some > seconds of splatting. I'm sure someone who knows more will respond; but could it be a signaling handling conflict? I don't know about pthreads specif

Re: java not working in mozilla

2001-01-15 Thread noisebrain
> Mozilla doesn't understand NPX_PLUGIN_PATH. You have to create a link This fixed the problem. Thank you -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: java not working in mozilla

2001-01-15 Thread Juergen Kreileder
> "noisebrain" == noisebrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: noisebrain> I've tried to get java working under mozilla several noisebrain> times without luck. Currently I'm using mozilla noisebrain> 2001010517 (released this month, I believe it's called noisebrain> 0.7). I'm lau

RE: java questions

2001-01-05 Thread KIRKBRIDE Rob
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 04 January 2001 18:28 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; KIRKBRIDE Rob > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > Subject: java questions > > > > Hi, > I have an interest in learning Java and as a first step I > have installed jdk > 1.3 on my computer. I wrote th

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >