Re: [lfs-support] Trouble in Installing Basic System Software

On Wed, 2021-04-07 at 17:48 +0300, Yasin YILMAZ wrote: > Hello, I am having problems in the "8.5. Glibc-2.33" part of the "Chapter 8. > Installing Basic System Software" stage, while creating LFS on the operating > system with Debian 10 Buster GNOME interface. All the details are below. > > OS: 

Re: [lfs-support] Issues with toolchain build ...

On Wed, 2021-03-24 at 17:07 +0100, Patrick Frisch wrote: > > Am 24.03.21 um 13:12 schrieb Scott Andrews: > > > > echo $LFS > > > > Looks like it wasn't set > > > > > > > > No, $LFS is set almost always to /mnt/lfs, as it was in this case, but > the cause for the error was found already. >

Re: [lfs-support] Issues with toolchain build ...

On Wed, 2021-03-24 at 15:15 +0100, Patrick Frisch wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > thank you for your reply > > Am 24.03.21 um 14:37 schrieb Pierre Labastie: > > The `cp' command copies "include" and all its subdirs to $LFS/usr. So > > they land > > where t

Re: [lfs-support] Issues with toolchain build ...

On Wed, 2021-03-24 at 12:55 +0100, Patrick Frisch wrote: > Hi there, >  I'm a big fan of the LFS project and build a system from time to time. My > last build was a bit outdated so I decided to begin from scratch. I realized, > that there are major changes in the build procedure for the toolchain

Re: [lfs-support] Boot scripts: request for comments

On Sat, 2021-03-20 at 07:09 -0400, Scott Andrews wrote: > On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 23:26:01 +0100 > Pierre Labastie wrote: > > > On Fri, 2021-03-19 at 07:24 -0400, Scott Andrews wrote: > > > On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 07:09:06 +0100 > > > Pierre Labastie wrote: > &g

Re: [lfs-support] Boot scripts: request for comments

On Fri, 2021-03-19 at 07:24 -0400, Scott Andrews wrote: > On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 07:09:06 +0100 > Pierre Labastie wrote: > > > > > Using brackets depends on "something". If something is a predicate, > > you need brackets. If something is a (compound) comm

Re: [lfs-support] Boot scripts: request for comments

;    # initialize status as "OK" >    SCRIPT_STAT="0" >    if [[ ! -h "${i}" ]]; then >   log_warning_msg "${i} is not a valid symlink." >   SCRIPT_STAT="1" >    fi >    if [[ ! -x "${i}" ]]; then >   log_warning_

Re: [lfs-support] Boot scripts: request for comments

On Thu, 2021-03-18 at 20:05 -0400, Scott Andrews wrote: > On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 22:17:07 +0100 > Pierre Labastie wrote: > > > On Thu, 2021-03-18 at 14:32 -0400, Scott Andrews wrote: > > > On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 11:51:09 -0500 > > > Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >

Re: [lfs-support] Boot scripts: request for comments

On Thu, 2021-03-18 at 14:32 -0400, Scott Andrews wrote: > On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 11:51:09 -0500 > Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > > On 3/18/21 11:21 AM, Scott Andrews wrote: > > > > > > I am presently looking at and working on the LFS boot scripts. > > > They are in my opinion very rough state. > > > > >

Re: [lfs-support] YIKES: /etc/init.d/rc

On Tue, 2021-03-16 at 12:35 -0400, Scott Andrews wrote: > > I am in the process of adding ipv6 to the the network scripts > > Yes, I have read IPv6-in-LFS.txt and that isn't the proper way to add > ipv6 to the bootscripts in my opinion. Good information wrong > implementation. I am looking to

Re: [lfs-support] how to find out grub boot path

On Sun, 2021-02-21 at 13:23 +0100, Thomas Seeling wrote: > Hallo, > > > Do I understand correctly that the main question is "which grub.cfg > > will be used by grub at next reboot after running grub-install"? Or > > is > > there more? > > basically yes, but no ;). I want to know where I came

Re: [lfs-support] Problem with grub and patch to dev.

On Sun, 2021-02-07 at 20:00 +0100, Frans de Boer wrote: > On 07/02/2021 18:19, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > On 2/7/21 8:11 AM, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > > On Sun, 2021-02-07 at 14:15 +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2021-02-07 at 13:38 +0100, Fra

Re: [lfs-support] how to find out grub boot path

On Fri, 2021-02-19 at 16:02 +0100, Thomas Seeling wrote: > Hallo, > > > > is it possible to query the "breadcrumb" of a grub boot process? > > > Is there a query function that I can use to find out how my > > > system got > > > bootstrapped? > > > Use a single boot partition and install grub to

Re: [lfs-support] Compile error glibc2.33 -> binutils-2.36.1

On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 12:28 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > On 2021-02-10 21:57 -0500, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote: > > Bonjour Xi (hello the list), > > > > On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 10:51 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > > > On 2021-02-10 22:47 +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > &

Re: [lfs-support] Compile error glibc2.33 -> binutils-2.36.1

On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 21:03 +, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 08:49:56PM +, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > > > Looks like I need to change the Frame pointer unwinder to the > > > ORC unwinder to have the same config as you. > > > > > > > The benefits of the ORC unwinder are

Re: [lfs-support] segfault building kernel (was: Compile error glibc2.33 -> binutils-2.36.1)

On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 20:04 +, Ken Moffat wrote: > The segfault is in objtool (see my reply to Pierre) and the output > object file got deleted.  I was using 5.14.1, my gzipped config, > objtool and core dump are now at > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~ken/tmp/ > The core file returns

Re: [lfs-support] Compile error glibc2.33 -> binutils-2.36.1

On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 16:32 +, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:44:31AM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 17:14 -0500, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote: > > > Hello, > > > On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 18:27 +, Ken Moffat wrote: > > >

Re: [lfs-support] Compile error glibc2.33 -> binutils-2.36.1

On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 17:14 -0500, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote: > Hello, > On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 18:27 +, Ken Moffat wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 12:29:14AM +, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 03:52:35AM +, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > > > > > ../configure --prefix=/usr   

Re: [lfs-support] fatal error: bits/c++config.h: No such file or directory

On Sun, 2021-02-07 at 21:49 -0600, paul rogers wrote: > On Sunday, February 7, 2021 2:54:42 PM CST Paul rogers wrote: > > On Sunday, February 7, 2021 2:33:02 PM CST Pierre Labastie wrote: > > > On Sun, 2021-02-07 at 13:20 -0600, paul rogers wrote: > > > > On Sunday

Re: [lfs-support] fatal error: bits/c++config.h: No such file or directory

On Sun, 2021-02-07 at 13:20 -0600, paul rogers wrote: > On Sunday, February 7, 2021 12:11:09 PM CST Pierre Labastie wrote: > > On Sun, 2021-02-07 at 11:26 -0600, paul rogers wrote: > > > On Sunday, February 7, 2021 6:26:29 AM CST Pierre Labastie wrote: > > > > On Sun

Re: [lfs-support] fatal error: bits/c++config.h: No such file or directory

On Sun, 2021-02-07 at 11:26 -0600, paul rogers wrote: > On Sunday, February 7, 2021 6:26:29 AM CST Pierre Labastie wrote: > > On Sun, 2021-02-07 at 01:18 -0600, p...@kemascraft.com wrote: > > > I'm working through the LFS 10.0 book. I got the error: " fatal > > >

Re: [lfs-support] Problem with grub and patch to dev.

On Sun, 2021-02-07 at 08:26 -0600, Jim Martin wrote: > On 2/7/21 6:38 AM, Frans de Boer wrote: > > LS, > > > > Finally had a change to finish the LFS build. Alas, the grub- > > install > > reported the old error "Decompression is too big". > > Here is the solution to add to the section to

Re: [lfs-support] Problem with grub and patch to dev.

On Sun, 2021-02-07 at 14:15 +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > On Sun, 2021-02-07 at 13:38 +0100, Frans de Boer wrote: > > LS, > > > > Finally had a change to finish the LFS build. Alas, the grub- > > install > > reported the old error "Decompression is too

Re: [lfs-support] Problem with grub and patch to dev.

On Sun, 2021-02-07 at 13:38 +0100, Frans de Boer wrote: > LS, > > Finally had a change to finish the LFS build. Alas, the grub-install > reported the old error "Decompression is too big". > Here is the solution to add to the section to compile grub: > > # Patch gentpl.py to avoid an error from

Re: [lfs-support] fatal error: bits/c++config.h: No such file or directory

On Sun, 2021-02-07 at 01:18 -0600, p...@kemascraft.com wrote: > I'm working through the LFS 10.0 book. I got the error: " fatal > error: bits/c+ > +config.h: No such file or directory". The file exist. I'm at > 8.6.1. Installation of DejaGNU. and ran the "make check." command. > I'm trying > to

Re: [lfs-support] Compile error glibc2.33

On Sat, 2021-02-06 at 13:43 +0100, Frans de Boer wrote: > On 05/02/2021 21:35, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > On Fri, 2021-02-05 at 20:54 +0100, Frans de Boer wrote: > > > On 05/02/2021 20:16, Frans de Boer wrote: > > >   > > > >   > > > >

Re: [lfs-support] Compile error glibc2.33

On Fri, 2021-02-05 at 20:54 +0100, Frans de Boer wrote: > On 05/02/2021 20:16, Frans de Boer wrote: >   > >   > > On 05/02/2021 16:25, xry...@mengyan1223.wang wrote: > >   > > >   > > > Hi Frans,  > > > > > > Could you send the result of > > > > > > $LFS_TGT-readelf -a $LFS/lib/libc.so.6 | grep

Re: [lfs-support] Compile file 5.39 (dev)

On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 17:11 -0500, Scott Andrews wrote: > > On 2/4/21 4:46 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 21:50 +0100, Frans de Boer wrote: > > > On 04/02/2021 21:21, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 20:03 +0100, Frans

Re: [lfs-support] Compile file 5.39 (dev)

On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 21:50 +0100, Frans de Boer wrote: > On 04/02/2021 21:21, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 20:03 +0100, Frans de Boer wrote: > > > On 04/02/2021 16:22, Scott Andrews wrote: > > > > On 2/4/21 9:14 AM, Frans de Boer wrote:

Re: [lfs-support] Compile file 5.39 (dev)

On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 21:21 +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 20:03 +0100, Frans de Boer wrote: > > On 04/02/2021 16:22, Scott Andrews wrote: > > > > > > On 2/4/21 9:14 AM, Frans de Boer wrote: > > > > The new instructions for compili

Re: [lfs-support] Compile file 5.39 (dev)

On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 20:03 +0100, Frans de Boer wrote: > On 04/02/2021 16:22, Scott Andrews wrote: > > > > On 2/4/21 9:14 AM, Frans de Boer wrote: > > > The new instructions for compiling file-5.39 in the first phase, > > > are > > > incomplete. As it turns out, you can only compile file when

[lfs-support] Apologies

Hi, A lot of the subscribers of this list have received a weird message telling they were subscribed to lfs-supp...@list3.linuxfromscratch.org (note a '3' instead of a 's' after 'list'). TL;DR: the list above is a prototype list, not to be used (now), and I made an error, please excuse me. The

Re: [lfs-support] Ncurses install 6.3.1 error in "tic" program build

On Fri, 2021-01-15 at 17:44 +0100, coolnodje wrote: > Many thanks! I wasn't aware of the creation of the config.log > > I was looking at the configure file itself trying to figure out what > would have gone wrong. > > In this case the error seems pretty clear: option -V doesn't seem to > be >

Re: [lfs-support] xg++: error: unrecognized command-line option '-funconfigured-libstdc++-v3' when compiling GCC 1st pass

On Tue, 2021-01-12 at 20:37 +0100, coolnodje wrote: > GCC compilation went well after fixing PATH from .bashrc > > > But oddly the problem when using `su - lfs` comes from .bash_profile, > containing > exec env -i HOME=$HOME TERM=$TERM PS1='\u:\w\$ ' /bin/bash as defined > in the book. > >

Re: [lfs-support] xg++: error: unrecognized command-line option '-funconfigured-libstdc++-v3' when compiling GCC 1st pass

On Mon, 2021-01-11 at 13:31 +0100, coolnodje wrote: > > > Anyway, good tip to redirect stdout, should be standard. > Makes the output much more readable even though still quite long in > this > case: stderr: https://pastebin.com/204fpTzi Hmmm, using cross-tools not prefixed with host triplet

Re: [lfs-support] xg++: error: unrecognized command-line option '-funconfigured-libstdc++-v3' when compiling GCC 1st pass

On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 10:51 +0100, coolnodje wrote: > Hi, > I'm using a Debian latest as host system and have met the following > problem when trying to compile GCC-10.2.0 - Pass 1, following > instructions from > http://linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/gcc-pass1.html > > xg++:

Re: [lfs-support] groff installation section 8.57

On Mon, 2020-12-14 at 14:17 +, James Read wrote: > I have run into a slight problem with section 8.57.1 Installation of > Groff. When I use the command: > > PAGE= ./configure --prefix=/usr > > It gives the following error: > > bash: paper_size: No such file or directory > > Is this a

Re: [lfs-support] make -k check failure for binutils ch 8.18

On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 16:08 -0600, Alexander Brassel wrote: > Additionally, > > here is running sed: > > ``` > make DESTDIR=$LFS install > cd .. > cd .. > cd gcc > ls > case $(uname -m) in   x86_64)     sed -e '/m64=/s/lib64/lib/' -i.orig > gcc/config/i386/t-linux64;   ;; esac > rm -rf build >

Re: [lfs-support] make -k check failure for binutils ch 8.18

On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 21:53 +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > Please do not top post... > > On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 13:54 -0600, Alexander Brassel wrote: > > Hi Ken, > > > > > The libgcc_s files should have been installed in $LFS/usr in gcc > > > pass 2 at the

Re: [lfs-support] make -k check failure for binutils ch 8.18

Please do not top post... On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 13:54 -0600, Alexander Brassel wrote: > Hi Ken, > > > The libgcc_s files should have been installed in $LFS/usr in gcc > > pass 2 at the end of chapter 6.  $LFS should be /mnt/lfs.  The only > > packages installed in /mnt/lfs/tools are binutils

Re: [lfs-support] GCC no longer searches for the correct header files after re-entering chroot environment

On Mon, 2020-09-28 at 10:29 -0400, Jared Stevens wrote: > Good day, > > I am hoping you all will be able to help me with a problem that has > been troubling me all weekend. > > I am building LFS through an Ubuntu VM (to eventually have LFS on a > VM disk) following the 10.0 systemd instructions.

Re: [lfs-support] Explain devel. chapter 5 and 6

On Sun, 2020-06-28 at 15:43 +0200, Frans de Boer wrote: > On 28-06-2020 15:16, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > On Sun, 2020-06-28 at 13:42 +0200, Frans de Boer wrote: > > > LS, > > > > > > Currently, the previous chapter 5 has been split into 3 separate >

Re: [lfs-support] Explain devel. chapter 5 and 6

On Sun, 2020-06-28 at 13:42 +0200, Frans de Boer wrote: > LS, > > Currently, the previous chapter 5 has been split into 3 separate > chapters. It is obvious why the new chapter 7 exists. > However, chapter 5 and 6 are a bit puzzling. There are no extra > actions > between chapter 6 and 5, in

Re: [lfs-support] Development (v10) LFS

On Sat, 2020-06-20 at 14:20 +0200, Frans de Boer wrote: > On 20-06-2020 13:12, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > > On 2020-06-20 13:02 +0200, Frans de Boer wrote: > > > On 19-06-2020 22:33, Frans de Boer wrote: > > > > On 19-06-2020 22:15, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > > >

Re: [lfs-support] Development (v10) LFS

On Fri, 2020-06-19 at 21:13 +0200, Frans de Boer wrote: > Dear all, > > I follow every step but always stumble on the '$LFS_TGT-gcc dummy.c' > - > in the first glibc.c section - in that crti.o can't be located by ld. > Looking for crti.o, I find it residing in the $LFS/usr/lib64 > directory.

Re: [lfs-support] DEV: Text and code do not match

On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 14:39 -0600, Flareon Zulu wrote: > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020, 14:37 Frans de Boer wrote: > > On 29-05-2020 21:09, Flareon Zulu wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020, 13:03 Frans de Boer > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Found it. Remember I could not find the

Re: [lfs-support] DEV: Text and code do not match

On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 15:45 +0200, Frans de Boer wrote: > On 29-05-2020 14:33, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 13:34 +0200, Frans de Boer wrote: > > > On 28-05-2020 15:08, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2020-05-28 at 14:16 +0200, Fra

Re: [lfs-support] DEV: Text and code do not match

On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 13:34 +0200, Frans de Boer wrote: > On 28-05-2020 15:08, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-05-28 at 14:16 +0200, Frans de Boer wrote: > > > LS, > > > > > > Pierre has described a change "Add a symlink from > > > /t

Re: [lfs-support] DEV: Text and code do not match

On Thu, 2020-05-28 at 14:16 +0200, Frans de Boer wrote: > LS, > > Pierre has described a change "Add a symlink from /tools/share/locale > to > /usr/share/locale/locale-archive, ..." > > The code refers to .../lib/locale and /usr/lib/locale is not created > in 6.5. > Ooops: will fix this ASAP.

Re: [lfs-support] SIGFPE not generated by raise

On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 00:27 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > On 5/26/20 11:43 PM, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > > On 2020-05-26 18:17 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > I'm trying to discover why two tests in the testsuite for 'check' > > > always fail for me. I've now got a response that the tests raise > > >

Re: [lfs-support] Test failures in vim-8.2.0486 with gcc-10.

On Sun, 2020-05-24 at 01:22 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > On 5/24/20 12:27 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: > > On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 04:11:53AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > This is LFS r11848 cross-chap5 branch from 13th May and I'm > > > trying > > > to understand why tests fail (although I don't always

Re: [lfs-support] fcron: Could not authenticate user using PAM

On Mon, 2020-05-18 at 09:06 +0200, Pierre Labastie wrote: > On Sun, 2020-05-17 at 22:11 -0400, Bud Rozwood wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I was recently trying to get fcron installed but I got stuck after > > installing the blfs-bootscript for fcron. Here's what happened: >

Re: [lfs-support] fcron: Could not authenticate user using PAM

On Sun, 2020-05-17 at 22:11 -0400, Bud Rozwood wrote: > Hi, > > I was recently trying to get fcron installed but I got stuck after > installing the blfs-bootscript for fcron. Here's what happened: > > # /etc/rc.d/init.d/fcron start && > fcrontab -z -u systab > * Starting >

Re: [lfs-support] Can't login - cycles back

On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 16:04 -0400, Bud Rozwood wrote: > Hi, > > For some reason I can't login today and I am not sure why. The prompt > for username and password comes up but when I type in my username and > press enter, it occasionally prints something on the screen but it's > too fast to read

Re: [lfs-support] OpenSSL 1.1.1g MD5

On Fri, 2020-04-24 at 09:30 +0200, Pierre Labastie wrote: > On Fri, 2020-04-24 at 00:41 -0600, flareonz...@gmail.com wrote: > > Can someone update the MD5 for the OpenSSL 1.1.1g package in the > > dev > > book? The packages.ent file has the wrong value for the download > &g

Re: [lfs-support] OpenSSL 1.1.1g MD5

On Fri, 2020-04-24 at 00:41 -0600, flareonz...@gmail.com wrote: > Can someone update the MD5 for the OpenSSL 1.1.1g package in the dev > book? The packages.ent file has the wrong value for the download > present, which means I’m not able to move forward with my jhalfs > build because it keeps

Re: [lfs-support] make check fails for Bison-3

On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 09:14 -0400, Bud Rozwood wrote: > Sorry the version is Bison-3.5.2. > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 9:12 AM Bud Rozwood > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've ran make check after flex was installed and I get some errors > > regarding the diagnostic tests and I'm not sure why. I've

Re: [lfs-support] BLFS: Dovecot-2.3.7.2

On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 12:47 -0400, Scott Andrews wrote: > On 4/15/20 12:38 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 11:44 -0400, Scott Andrews wrote: > > > The local.conf file is incorrect and will not allow remote logins > > > > > > add th

Re: [lfs-support] BLFS: Dovecot-2.3.7.2

On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 11:44 -0400, Scott Andrews wrote: > The local.conf file is incorrect and will not allow remote logins > > add this to the local.conf file to correct > > disable_plaintext_auth = no > > cat > /etc/dovecot/local.conf <<- EOF > > protocols = imap >

Re: [lfs-support] su: Cannot drop the controlling terminal - 6.25 GCC

On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 21:01 +0800, dev o wrote: > Good morning, > > Thank you for each of the responses, I'll respond to each in order: > > - > > Which version of LFS book are you using? And what is the output of > "version- > check.sh" in sect. 2.2.? > > Version: LFS-9.1 > >

Re: [lfs-support] LFS GGC 9.2.0 compiling Error on ARM-System

On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 11:58 +0200, Pierre Labastie wrote: > On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 10:25 +0200, 女 Martin Wagner wrote: > > Hello, > > > > creating a new LFS on an ARM (aarch64) System (Rockpro64 with > > DietPi- > > distribution) stops on compiling GCC in chap

Re: [lfs-support] LFS GGC 9.2.0 compiling Error on ARM-System

On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 10:25 +0200, 女 Martin Wagner wrote: > Hello, > > creating a new LFS on an ARM (aarch64) System (Rockpro64 with DietPi- > distribution) stops on compiling GCC in chapter 5.10. (GCC-9.2.0 - > Pass 2) with an Error 1: > > build/genautomata.o build/rtl.o build/read-rtl.o

Re: [lfs-support] Linux kernel doesn't see partitions

Le 26/03/2020 à 21:03, Jason Gauthier a écrit : > I'm to the point where grub needs to be installed. > I've built LFS on a loopback device, so there isn't a physical drive to > install grub to. > > I booted a debian recovery disk, and I installed and configured grub.   > Since I'm going to use

Re: [lfs-support] Binutils 2.34 error

Le 22/03/2020 à 11:28, Pierre Labastie a écrit : > Le 22/03/2020 à 11:07, spiky0011 a écrit : >> Hi >> >> I,m having an error with Binutils-2.34 make ch6 lfs-systemd svn version >> >> libtool: compile:  gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../bfd -DBINDIR=\"/usr

Re: [lfs-support] Binutils 2.34 error

Le 22/03/2020 à 11:07, spiky0011 a écrit : > Hi > > I,m having an error with Binutils-2.34 make ch6 lfs-systemd svn version > > libtool: compile:  gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../bfd -DBINDIR=\"/usr/bin\" > -DLIBDIR=\"/usr/lib\" -I. -I../../bfd -I../../bfd/../include > -DHAVE_x86_64_elf64_vec

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 9.1-systemd, stuck in Chapter 6.73 - Installing Systemd-244

Le 08/03/2020 à 23:35, Michele Bucca a écrit : > > > Il dom 8 mar 2020, 20:06 Christos Kompogiannis > ha scritto: > > I've followed the book's instructions closely and everything has gone > pretty smoothly so far, but no matter how many times I've tried

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 9.1 build gcc stage2 fails

Le 03/03/2020 à 10:29, Thomas Seeling a écrit : > Hallo, > > > I tried building LFS 9.1 (sysv-init) with jhalfs yesterday. Started ok, > built binutils and gcc stage1 just fine. > Then it stops and the final message is that configure aborts because gcc > cannot create an executable. > It fails

Re: [lfs-support] Ld-new. Versus ld-gold

Le 28/02/2020 à 10:22, Xi Ruoyao a écrit : > On 2020-02-28 10:03 +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: >> Le 28/02/2020 à 09:53, Xi Ruoyao a écrit : >>> On 2020-02-28 06:47 +, Fred Finster wrote: >>>> I have not studied this ld-new linker. >>>> >>>

Re: [lfs-support] Ld-new. Versus ld-gold

Le 28/02/2020 à 09:53, Xi Ruoyao a écrit : > On 2020-02-28 06:47 +, Fred Finster wrote: >> I have not studied this ld-new linker. >> >> Is "ld-gold" a faster linker to use when building Linux from scratch ,. Then >> "ld-new" > > You are misinterpreting the book. It's ld.bfd versus ld.gold,

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc-2.31 issues

Le 20/02/2020 à 22:16, Pierre Labastie a écrit : > Le 20/02/2020 à 19:58, Tom Willhite a écrit : >> >> >> -- >> *From:* lfs-support on >> behalf >> of Douglas R. Reno >&g

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc-2.31 issues

Le 14/02/2020 à 23:43, TomW a écrit : > > On 2/7/20 3:23 PM, Douglas R. Reno wrote: >> >> >> On 2/6/20 1:05 PM, Tom Willhite wrote: >>> Just a heads up FYI.   I failed to build latest systemd-svn using a 1 month >>> old tools tball by hand.   Systemd-244 ninja got to machinectl and errored >>>

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc-2.31 issues

Le 06/02/2020 à 20:05, Tom Willhite a écrit : > Just a heads up FYI.   I failed to build latest systemd-svn using a 1 month > old tools tball by hand.   Systemd-244 ninja got to machinectl and errored > out.   So I fired up a jhalfs build using latest svn version of it and that > built ok but upon

Re: [lfs-support] Build New Driver after LFS

Le 05/02/2020 à 22:19, Furkan İnciroğlu a écrit : > On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 at 09:13, Xi Ruoyao wrote: >> >> On 2020-02-04 21:44 +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: >>> Le 04/02/2020 à 17:47, Furkan İnciroğlu a écrit : >>>> Hi there, >>>> >>>> Af

Re: [lfs-support] Build New Driver after LFS

Le 04/02/2020 à 17:47, Furkan İnciroğlu a écrit : > Hi there, > > After my LFS-BLFS compilation, I delete all my tools and other build > directories. Now, I have to build some driver such as igb and mmc disk driver. > When I download igb tar.gz and extract, Not sure I understand the above. Isn't

Re: [lfs-support] Different version of automake needed.

Le 03/02/2020 à 18:11, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : > On 2/3/20 9:58 AM, Pitmaster wrote: >> Hi there all, >> >> I have found this problem. I am trying to make LFS 9.0 on my Intel NUC (i5 >> 16 gig mem) Ubuntu 18.04 LTS installed. >> >> At compiling Bison-3.4.1 make gave back the error that it needed

Re: [lfs-support] Install texinfo on Centos7 / CentOS Linux 7 (Core)

Le 27/01/2020 à 02:29, knothea...@gmail.com a écrit : > I swore i did that piece. mmnn. maybe i did not. > Any how it works. Thanks. > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 4:39 PM Bruce Dubbs > wrote: > > On 1/26/20 3:52 PM, knothea...@gmail.com

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc2.30 1st pass failed: 'time' alias in time.c

Le 26/01/2020 à 07:46, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : > On 1/25/20 11:23 PM, Sourabh Sagar wrote: > > >> # ./version_check.sh >> GNU bash, version 5.0.3(1)-release >> --Error: /bin/sh doesn't point to bash- > > First fix this.  Then start over. > On debian: "dpkg-reconfigure dash" Pierre >>

Re: [lfs-support] Building editor-manual

‌ De : "Bruce Dubbs" A : "Pierre Labastie" Envoyé: jeudi 23 janvier 2020 17:21 Objet : Re: [lfs-support] Building editor-manual On 1/23/20 8:01 AM, Pierre Labastie wrote: Le 23/01/2020 à 13:25, Scott Andrews a écrit: On 1/22/20 9:49 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: On 1/22/20 8:29

Re: [lfs-support] Building editor-manual

Le 23/01/2020 à 13:25, Scott Andrews a écrit : > > On 1/22/20 9:49 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> On 1/22/20 8:29 PM, Douglas R. Reno wrote: >> > This link does not exist any more http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/1.69.1/xhtml/profile-docbook.xsl >> >>> I can confirm

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc Localedef Problem

Le 05/01/2020 à 13:52, Cindy Sue Causey a écrit : > On 1/4/20, Alan Feuerbacher wrote: >> On 1/4/2020 12:49 PM, Xi Ruoyao wrote: >>> On 2020-01-04 10:21 -0700，Alan Feuerbacher wrote: I've run into a problem in building Version 20200101-systemd Section 6.9. Glibc-2.30. After

Re: [lfs-support] LFS-9.0 5.24. Gettext-0.20.1 build error

Le 05/01/2020 à 05:37, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : > On 1/4/20 7:45 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 05:11:18PM -0500, Scott Andrews wrote: >>> >>> On 1/4/20 1:45 PM, Flareon Zulu wrote: On January 4, 2020, at 09:47, Scott Andrews wrote: > Anyone have this error?

Re: [lfs-support] LFS-9.0: 3.2. All Packages: ACL

Le 01/01/2020 à 18:40, Scott Andrews a écrit : > Home page for ACL should be: > > Home page: https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/acl > Thanks for report. Added at revision 11718. Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ:

Re: [lfs-support] login as root -- su root OR su - root ?

Le 01/01/2020 à 18:31, Alan Feuerbacher a écrit : > > On 1/1/2020 8:11 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> On 12/31/19 11:30 PM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote: >>> On 12/31/2019 5:01 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: On 12/31/19 4:47 PM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote: > Another question on building LFS Version

Re: [lfs-support] Make and install errors with gcc-9.2.1 on Fedora ?

Le 31/12/2019 à 07:50, Alan Feuerbacher a écrit : > I'm trying to build LFS Version 20191222-systemd on a Fedora 31 host, > which has gcc-9.2.1 installed. I'm getting errors from > 5.5. GCC-9.2.0 - Pass 1. Configure seems to run ok; the > config.log file ends with "configure: exit 0". But I seem

Re: [lfs-support] Checksum Error in Version 20191222-systemd

Le 31/12/2019 à 06:13, Alan Feuerbacher a écrit : > > On 12/30/2019 6:11 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> On 12/30/19 4:20 PM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote: >>> In section "3.1 Introduction" checking checksums shows an error for line >>> 61: python-3.8.1-docs... >> >> OK, it's been fixed.  Thanks. >> >>   --

Re: [lfs-support] Chroot Path Problem for Python

Le 30/12/2019 à 08:55, Pierre Labastie a écrit : > Le 30/12/2019 à 07:17, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : >> On 12/29/19 10:41 PM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote: >>> >>> On 12/29/2019 4:28 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>>> On 12/29/19 4:57 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: >>>>>

Re: [lfs-support] Chroot Path Problem for Python

Le 30/12/2019 à 07:17, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : > On 12/29/19 10:41 PM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote: >> >> On 12/29/2019 4:28 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> On 12/29/19 4:57 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 09:02:34PM +, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 01:40:17PM -0600,

Re: [lfs-support] compile 32-bit kernel on a 64-bit LFS?

On 11/12/2019 15:33, Thomas Seeling wrote: Hallo, I have some servers running with 32-bit LFS (intentionally). Longterm I plan to switch to 64 bit, but not right now. I'm contemplating switching the kernel compile from a 32-bit machine to one of my 64-bit systems to win some time. The 32-bit

Re: [lfs-support] GCC Pass 2 (Chapter 5) compilation fatal error

Le 01/12/2019 à 14:25, Pierre Labastie a écrit : > Le 01/12/2019 à 13:06, Henk Boswijk a écrit : >> [...] > > If it is found, check that /tools/bin/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu-g++ is able to > find it: > > echo 'int main () { }' | /tools/bin/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu-g++ --verbose

Re: [lfs-support] GCC Pass 2 (Chapter 5) compilation fatal error

Le 01/12/2019 à 13:06, Henk Boswijk a écrit : > I am following LFS-systemd Book 9.0. When compiling Gcc Pass 2 I get the > following fatal error: > > make[2]: Entering directory > '/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-9.2.0/build/build-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libcpp' > x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu-g++  -I../../../libcpp -I.

Re: [lfs-support] rsync requirement for linux-5.4

Le 28/11/2019 à 17:49, flareonzulu a écrit : > an someone please check that the linux-5x kernels are only using rsync in > the header installation section? I had no problems with building my > toolchain, but immediately had trouble when installing the headers for my > soon-to-be-shiny new LFS

Re: [lfs-support] su and pam

Le 28/11/2019 à 13:43, Pierre Labastie a écrit : > Le 27/11/2019 à 17:40, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : >> Restarting previous thread as a new discussion. >> >>> On 2019-11-26 14:56 -0600, Douglas R. Reno wrote: >>>>> On 2019-11-26 14:39, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >

Re: [lfs-support] Known Working Distro for Latest Stable

Le 27/11/2019 à 18:14, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : > On 11/27/19 11:07 AM, Pierre Labastie wrote: >> Le 27/11/2019 à 06:05, Xi Ruoyao a écrit : >>> On 2019-11-26 14:56 -0600, Douglas R. Reno wrote: >>>> On 2019-11-26 14:39, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>>>> On 11/26/1

Re: [lfs-support] su and pam

Le 27/11/2019 à 17:40, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : > Restarting previous thread as a new discussion. > >> On 2019-11-26 14:56 -0600, Douglas R. Reno wrote: On 2019-11-26 14:39, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Also, I am running into an issue I haven't noticed before.  On my existing system if I

Re: [lfs-support] Known Working Distro for Latest Stable

Le 27/11/2019 à 06:05, Xi Ruoyao a écrit : > On 2019-11-26 14:56 -0600, Douglas R. Reno wrote: >> On 2019-11-26 14:39, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> On 11/26/19 1:27 PM, Xi Ruoyao wrote: On 2019-11-26 12:54 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > On 11/26/19 9:30 AM, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > >> But on

Re: [lfs-support] XSL Stylesheet issue (PDF)

Le 15/11/2019 à 21:00, Thomas Trepl a écrit : > Hi all, > > for a from LFS totally different project, i us docbook xml to document > some stuff. The documentation should also be provided as PDF. So for, > nothing special, the LFS project tought me to handle Docbook (thanks > for that!). > > The

Re: [lfs-support] compiling GCC C compiler cannot create executable

On 26/10/2019 23:18, capnhawkbill wrote: > LFS_TGT is set to x86_64-pc-linux-gnu This is what is wrong: it should be x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu. Check .bashrc in /home/lfs directory. > Do I need a special no-bootstrap flag? I think you don't, once you have fixed the error above. Pierre --

Re: [lfs-support] ***SPAM*** Re: compiling GCC C compiler cannot create executable

On 26/10/2019 20:19, capnhawkbill wrote: >> the question was : chapter 5 GCC pass 1, chapter 5 GCC pass 2, or chapter 6 >> GCC? > Oh I'm trying to do pass 1 chapter 5 > > >> Good! Are you pasting from the pdf book or from the html version (if so with >> which browser?). > I'm copying from the

Re: [lfs-support] compiling GCC C compiler cannot create executable

On 26/10/2019 08:15, capnhawkbill wrote: > On 19/10/25 12:59pm, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> >> What package are you building? Some things to consider: > I'm trying to build GCC. the question was : chapter 5 GCC pass 1, chapter 5 GCC pass 2, or chapter 6 GCC? > >> 1. Is the output of the Host System

Re: [lfs-support] Important software missing from LFS Basic System

On 24/10/2019 08:06, Xi Ruoyao wrote: On 2019-10-24 05:34 +, DJ Lucas wrote: Poor naming and I haven't actually tested that last one, but it is available. Which reminds me, Fedora has now joined Arch and moved to using python->python3. Now that Samba is all python3 - I think that was the

  1   2   3   4   >