Robin Houston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (Sadly I no longer have shell access to any four-processor Sun
> machines to confirm this.)
Which reminds me.
How in gods name do Sun get away with charging so much for stuff?
We've erm, "acquired" an enterprise 420. this box has 2 CPUs, 4G or
RAM and
I'd be failing in my duty as group leader if I didn't pass on this
announcement from the Perl Mongers Group Leaders mailing list :)
Dave...
- Forwarded message from Uri Guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 15:25:55 -0500
From: Uri Guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL P
a public archive containing all our email addresses is obviously bad.
no-spam countermeasures help, but it's an ugly solution..
it's also about atmosphere. i don't like contributing to a friendly,
discussive list that's archived and searchable by anyone who happens to
drop by. mutual trust is
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, you wrote:
> * Robin Szemeti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > I must admit I don;t particularly like the idea of someone else holding
> > this info though .. I mean .. its like 'ours' innit .. but i have no
>
> i'm sure you could do something in your sig, along the lines o
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 10:24:07PM +, Kieran Barry wrote:
> It isn't a question of google finding out about you: it is about how
> much information you want made available to complete strangers. How
> would you feel if a member of this list was sacked because someone
> accessed an archive and
* James Powell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> To make it harder for google to find you - change your name Prince style.
>
good idea!
- greg of wales
--
Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net
* Robin Szemeti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> I must admit I don;t particularly like the idea of someone else holding
> this info though .. I mean .. its like 'ours' innit .. but i have no
i'm sure you could do something in your sig, along the lines of
this email is copyright of robin szemeti
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:24:44PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> * Robin Houston ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 09:14:08PM +, Leon Brocard wrote:
> > > o grow up
> >
> > Hey! No need to get defensive till you lose the vote :-)
> >
>
> i vote for no vote, keep thin
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, you wrote:
> Robin Houston sent the following bits through the ether:
>
> > - This is a public list. Anyone can subscribe using an advertised
> > address.
>
> This is the key point. It is a public list. If you don't like the idea
> that your potential employers or employee
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Leon Brocard wrote:
> Robin Houston sent the following bits through the ether:
>
> > - This is a public list. Anyone can subscribe using an advertised
> > address.
>
> This is the key point. It is a public list. If you don't like the idea
> that your potential employers o
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:24:44PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> [1] you++ to anyone who gets the joke apart from stevem
This is clearly a red ha^Herring. Ignore.
Besides,
Paul
* Robin Houston ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 09:14:08PM +, Leon Brocard wrote:
> > o grow up
>
> Hey! No need to get defensive till you lose the vote :-)
>
i vote for no vote, keep things as they are
if people object to their views being public, don't post them in
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 09:14:08PM +, Leon Brocard wrote:
> o grow up
Hey! No need to get defensive till you lose the vote :-)
.robin.
Robin Houston sent the following bits through the ether:
> - This is a public list. Anyone can subscribe using an advertised
> address.
This is the key point. It is a public list. If you don't like the idea
that your potential employers or employees could read everything you
write then:
o gr
Well, this discussion has been beaten to death on IRC,
so I feel like I'm repeating myself here. But for the
public record: ;-)
- This is a public list. Anyone can subscribe using an advertised
address.
- We're not plotting to bring down the government.
- "Information wants to be free." Old e
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 08:20:28PM +, Dave Cross wrote:
> >From the discussion on IRC, it seems that Leon's summary mail has opened
> a bit of a can of worms. There are a number of people who don't like the
> idea of a publically advertised archive of this mailing list.
For the record, I don'
>From the discussion on IRC, it seems that Leon's summary mail has opened
a bit of a can of worms. There are a number of people who don't like the
idea of a publically advertised archive of this mailing list.
It seems that mail-archive.com have been archiving our list for some
time and anyone who
Steve Mynott [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth:
*>I just installed my own totally separate version of Perl 5.6 in
*>/usr/local, used that and have had no problems to date, although its
*>best to explicitly state '/usr/local/bin/perl' to prevent confusion
*>and have that first in your PATH.
*>
*>I don't th
On or about Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 05:48:50PM +, Redvers Davies typed:
>If you run enlightment as a windowmanager you can use the URL
>epplet. You simply highlight the URL (or a lump of text which contains
>a URL) and click "www", "ftp" or "get". WWW opens up a web browser,
>ftp opens up an x
> to delete the URL in a browser window and then paste. Being
> able to click it and then hit ^V is *much* nicer (in Windows)
> than this manual delete time wastage.
If you run enlightment as a windowmanager you can use the URL
epplet. You simply highlight the URL (or a lump of text which contai
> > DREAMWEAVER 3.0- Training Dates Now Available!
> > ==
> > With Dreamweaver being adopted by up to 90% of development companies
> > worldwide, Focus Group are now providing cost effective, scheduled and
> > company specific Dreamweaver training, offer
> I generally find myself writing outlines on paper or in textpad and then
> finishing in MSWord, since that's how everyone wants the final product.
I refuse to provide documentation in Word as its prone to editing by
others. For me, Lyx -> Latex -> PDF. PGP sign and deliver.
* Steve Mynott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > you dont want this job, you'd have to sit near me ;-)
>
> The upside of this is that you are likely to get the occasional
> chocolate bar thrown in your direction!
>
i only buy chocolate for good littl
* at 25/01 15:56 - Robert Shiels said:
> Subject: RE: Dream weaver
>
> Just got sent this:
>
> DREAMWEAVER 3.0- Training Dates Now Available!
> ==
> With Dreamweaver being adopted by up to 90% of development companies
> worldwide, Focus Group are n
Subject: RE: Dream weaver
Just got sent this:
DREAMWEAVER 3.0- Training Dates Now Available!
==
With Dreamweaver being adopted by up to 90% of development companies
worldwide, Focus Group are now providing cost effective, scheduled and
company specific
http://www.byte.com/column/BYT20010111S0004
--
Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net
Title: RE: Dream weaver
>>
>>> >>I would actually be interested to hear from someone on the
>>> >>Dreamweaver side of this argument...
>>> >>
>>> >>Anyone?
>>> >>
>>> >>Michael
>>>
>>> I'd love to but the last time I spoke about Dreamweaver with Dave
>>> Cross around it turned into a LOOONG
Matthews Simon sent the following bits through the ether:
> Our solution to this has been to write some perl
> code to convert Word documents (marketers tool of choice) into
> Template::Toolkit templates that we use internally.
IIRC, you had patched wvware to output XML. Has this patch made it
i
At Thu, 25 Jan 2001 13:43:47 -, Mark Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>I would actually be interested to hear from someone on the
> >>Dreamweaver side of this argument...
> >>
> >>Anyone?
> >>
> >>Michael
>
> I'd love to but the last time I spoke about Dreamweaver with Dave
> Cross ar
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:43:47PM -, Mark Kitching wrote:
> >>I would actually be interested to hear from someone on the
> >>Dreamweaver side of this argument...
> >>Anyone?
> >>Michael
> I'd love to but the last time I spoke about Dreamweaver with Dave Cross
> around
> it turned into a LOOON
Title: RE: Dream weaver
>>I would actually be interested to hear from someone on the
>>Dreamweaver side of this argument...
>>
>>Anyone?
>>
>>Michael
I'd love to but the last time I spoke about Dreamweaver with Dave Cross around
it turned into a LOOONG lunchtime.
Mark.
At Thu, 25 Jan 2001 13:37:24 +, Michael Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would actually be interested to hear from someone on the
> Dreamweaver side of this argument...
>
> Anyone?
Wouldn't it go along the lines of:
"ooh! pretty!"
Dave...
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:32:46PM -, Matthews Simon wrote:
> As someone who's been using templates and perl to do web sites since January
> 96 I can see both sides of the argument. We (perl people) are all much
> happier with the idea of building pages from bits it appeals to our
> laziness.
As someone who's been using templates and perl to do web sites since January
96 I can see both sides of the argument. We (perl people) are all much
happier with the idea of building pages from bits it appeals to our
laziness. There are however end users to consider. Much as I have tried I
canno
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Robin Szemeti wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, you wrote:
>
> > > Much as I love Computer Modern for technical work, using it for fiction
> > > would just be WRONG WRONG WRONG.
>
> If you are interested, I have some technical documents that could also be
> called fiction .. i
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, you wrote:
> > Much as I love Computer Modern for technical work, using it for fiction
> > would just be WRONG WRONG WRONG.
If you are interested, I have some technical documents that could also be
called fiction .. is it alright to use computer modern then??
--
Robin Sze
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 10:08:10AM +, Steve Mynott wrote:
>
> BTW does any know why Sun refer to cpu0 and cpu2 and not 0 and 1? Is
> it a marketing thing so the number 2 appears as an obvious second
> processor or is there a real reason?
Well, if you have four processors they're numbered 0,
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Robert Shiels wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Stupid question, but a code snppet got posted to NY-PM last night, and I
> wanted to play with it. The problem I have is not understanding how to add
> this function (rcsw) to get it to run from cron, or indeed, to run. I've put
> the code in m
* at 25/01 11:26 + James Powell said:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:05:49AM +, Struan Donald wrote:
> > * at 25/01 10:37 + Michael Stevens said:
> > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 06:02:25PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > Dreamweaver (I know, don't ask) nicely escapes the spac
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:05:49AM +, Struan Donald wrote:
> * at 25/01 10:37 + Michael Stevens said:
> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 06:02:25PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Dreamweaver (I know, don't ask) nicely escapes the spaces to %20 but when
> > > I try and download
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:09:15AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Pretty much !
>
> Having started the web site project here without much knowledge of developing
> websites (having mostly been doing corporate network support before that) I
> allowed the designer to choose the tools. I chose ap
Roger Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed 24 Jan, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Dreamweaver (I know, don't ask)
>
>But I must ! You are only the second person I have heard of who has used
>it...
>
[snip]
>Am I right in thinking that what CS said made as much sense as "We don't
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:05:49AM +, Struan Donald wrote:
> the number of times i've sent stuff to people that works fine, had
> them run it through dreamweaver and then complain that it's broken
> makes me wonder what the bad gui tools are like.
Much much worse. Trust me on this.
Michael
* at 25/01 10:37 + Michael Stevens said:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 06:02:25PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Dreamweaver (I know, don't ask) nicely escapes the spaces to %20 but when
> > I try and download these, the %20 appears in the Netscape file save as box
> > inste
Steve Mynott wrote:
> Anil Madhavapeddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Perl is still mashed up, out of the box :-( We had to do
> > some patching to get CPAN to work, and don't even think of
> > installing a fresh copy, or half the admintools (linked
> > against their special copy), fail mis
At Thu, 25 Jan 2001 10:37:07 +, Michael Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dreamweaver is by far the best GUI html development tool I'm aware of.
Maybe, but calling something the 'best' in that product category is
probably damning with faint praise.
Dave...
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 06:02:25PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dreamweaver (I know, don't ask) nicely escapes the spaces to %20 but when
> I try and download these, the %20 appears in the Netscape file save as box
> instead of spaces.
Dreamweaver is by far the best GUI htm
On Wed 24 Jan, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dreamweaver (I know, don't ask)
But I must ! You are only the second person I have heard of who has used
it...
In November I was asked by a Judge to convert a court guide written in Word
into HTML. Only real problem was the index which was good,
I'm still looking for suggestions for venues for the next two technical
meetings (Feb 22 & 26).
How do people feel about going back to State51? Does someone want to
contact the ICA?
Any other suggestions?
Dave...
Today is the last day to submit paper proposals to TPC5. Tutorials
and presentations have another week.
Dave...
Hi,
Stupid question, but a code snppet got posted to NY-PM last night, and I
wanted to play with it. The problem I have is not understanding how to add
this function (rcsw) to get it to run from cron, or indeed, to run. I've put
the code in my ~/.bashrc file, am I on the right track ?
-
(cc added to london.pm)
Anil Madhavapeddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quoting Steve Mynott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Sun do seem to have mended their ways a little. They even ship apache
> > and bash as binary packages on extra CD with Solaris 8 and, most
> > importantly, gcc!
>
> Perl is
Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> you dont want this job, you'd have to sit near me ;-)
The upside of this is that you are likely to get the occasional
chocolate bar thrown in your direction!
--
1024/D9C69DF9 steve mynott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for every complex problem, there is a
* Benjamin Holzman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 07:15:26PM -0500, Benjamin Holzman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 12:07:38PM -0600, Paul Makepeace wrote:
> > > Linux UI question (on Debian/KDE laptop right now): If I copy
>^^^
> > $ s
54 matches
Mail list logo
