Questions in English might attract more answers.
el
On 15/07/2023 12:25, isabell.gals...@studium.fernuni-hagen.de wrote:
> Hallo liebes Lyx-Team,
>
>
>
> mein Ziel ist es, ein mit BibTeX-erzeugtes Literaturverzeichnis MIT
> Kapitel-Nummerierung ins Inhaltsverze
Am Samstag, dem 15.07.2023 um 12:25 +0200 schrieb
isabell.gals...@studium.fernuni-hagen.de:
>
> mein Ziel ist es, ein mit BibTeX-erzeugtes Literaturverzeichnis MIT
> Kapitel-Nummerierung ins Inhaltsverzeichnis aufzunehmen.
> (ich nutze KOMA-Script-Bericht)
Siehe beigefügtes Beis
Hallo liebes Lyx-Team,
mein Ziel ist es, ein mit BibTeX-erzeugtes Literaturverzeichnis MIT
Kapitel-Nummerierung ins Inhaltsverzeichnis aufzunehmen.
Bisher ist es mir gelungen, dass im Inhaltsverzeichnis zwischen dem letzten
Kapitel 5 und dem Anhang(das ist Kapitel 6) ein
On Fri, 18 Sep 2020, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Biblatex has many fields that BibTeX typically doesn't have, and some
fileds have a different syntax. E.g., address takes and "and"-separated
list (Berlin and New York and Boston). However, Biblatex can deal with all
BibTeX fields
Am Donnerstag, den 17.09.2020, 12:51 -0700 schrieb Rich Shepard:
> I reconfigured LyX to use biblatex rather than bibtex. Are there any
> differences in the structure of the *.bib file between the two?
Biblatex has many fields that BibTeX typically doesn't have, and some
fileds have a dif
I reconfigured LyX to use biblatex rather than bibtex. Are there any
differences in the structure of the *.bib file between the two?
For the time being I'm sticking with JabRef-5.1 because I've been using it
for years and I need to work with the contents rather than learning a new
tool
> On Jul 8, 2020, at 5:05 AM, list_em...@icloud.com wrote:
>
> I am preparing to send tex files, graphics files, etc. to a publisher. I
> think there should be a way to send something less than my entire bibtex file
> to them. Is there a way to easily extract only the refer
I am preparing to send tex files, graphics files, etc. to a publisher. I think
there should be a way to send something less than my entire bibtex file to
them. Is there a way to easily extract only the references that I am using for
this paper into a separate bibtex file or is there some other
On 7/8/20 9:33 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Mi., 8. Juli 2020 um 14:06 Uhr schrieb <mailto:list_em...@icloud.com>>:
>
> I am preparing to send tex files, graphics files, etc. to a
> publisher. I think there should be a way to send something less
> th
Am Mi., 8. Juli 2020 um 14:06 Uhr schrieb :
> I am preparing to send tex files, graphics files, etc. to a publisher. I
> think there should be a way to send something less than my entire bibtex
> file to them. Is there a way to easily extract only the references that I
> am using fo
Thanks for the feedback and suggestions.Mike
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Tuesday, June 16, 2020, 2:18 pm, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
Mike,
I am an elderly Gynecologist myself (and (have to) use Windows10 for the
practice management software (of course in a VirtualBox window on a
n your criticism and
> observations. I had been using lyx 2.2 version successfully in my
> review article. So the bibtex and referencing worked perfectly as
> wells as the nomenclature listing. Furthermore my version of lyx is
> tolerant of spaces in flienames etc. It is only
Dear EberhardCould u be a little more respectful in your criticism and
observations. I had been using lyx 2.2 version successfully in my review
article. So the bibtex and referencing worked perfectly as wells as the
nomenclature listing. Furthermore my version of lyx is tolerant of spaces
Mike,
I am an elderly Gynecologist myself (and (have to) use Windows10 for the
practice management software (of course in a VirtualBox window on a
Mac)) :-)-O and I can tell you even my mother could switch from Windows
to the Mac :-)-O.
And, as a matter of fact, she did :-)-O
I like to bleed
Mike,
Do away with Windows and get yourself a proper Mac.
el
On 16/06/2020 13:45, Mike Reeks wrote:
> Dear Eberhard
> Could u be a little more respectful in your criticism and
> observations. I had been using lyx 2.2 version successfully in my
> review article. So the bibtex and
eks <mailto:mike.re...@yahoo.com>
> *Sent: *11 June 2020 10:45
> *To: *lyx-users-subscr...@lists.lyx.org
> *Subject: *Problems using Bibtex with lyx. Help!!
>
>
>
> I have used bibtex generated bibliography with access to an
> appropriates bibtex database of reference
*Sent: *11 June 2020 10:45
*To: *lyx-users-subscr...@lists.lyx.org
<mailto:lyx-users-subscr...@lists.lyx.org>
*Subject: *Problems using Bibtex with lyx. Help!!
I have used bibtex generated bibliography with access to an
appropriates bibtex database of
2020 10:45
To: lyx-users-subscr...@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Problems using Bibtex with lyx. Help!!
I have used bibtex generated bibliography with access to an appropriates bibtex
database of references in all my lyx files that cite references.
Upto now I have had no problems. I usually
-decoration:underline;}#yiv5237382451
.yiv5237382451MsoChpDefault {} _filtered {}#yiv5237382451
div.yiv5237382451WordSection1 {}#yiv5237382451
...
From: Mike Reeks
Sent: 11 June 2020 10:45
To: lyx-users-subscr...@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Problems using Bibtex with lyx. Help!!
I have
Op 11-06-2020 om 17:18 schreef Paul A. Rubin:
On 6/11/20 7:36 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
...
*From: *Mike Reeks <mailto:mike.re...@yahoo.com>
*Sent: *11 June 2020 10:45
*To: *lyx-users-subscr...@lists.lyx.org
<mailto:lyx-users-subscr...@lists.lyx.org>
*Subject: *Problems using Bib
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Mike Reeks
Sent: 11 June 2020 10:45
To: lyx-users-subscr...@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Problems using Bibtex with lyx. Help!!
I have used bibtex generated bibliography with access to an appropriates bibtex
database of references in all my lyx files that cite
.org>
*Subject: *Problems using Bibtex with lyx. Help!!
I have used bibtex generated bibliography with access to an
appropriates bibtex database of references in all my lyx files that
cite references.
Upto now I have had no problems. I usually generate a pdf file in the
lyx document conver
On 3/31/20 4:43 AM, Bernt Lie wrote:
>
> I’m using LyX 2.3.4.3 on Windows 10, with MikTeX distribution 2.9.
>
>
>
> Lately, LyX has had problems with finding the location of *.bst styles
> in MikTeX. I had to manually browse through the MikTeX directory on my
> computer to find the directory of
I’m using LyX 2.3.4.3 on Windows 10, with MikTeX distribution 2.9.
Lately, LyX has had problems with finding the location of *.bst styles in
MikTeX. I had to manually browse through the MikTeX directory on my computer to
find the directory of the relevant *.bst files. Also, the entire path of
On Fri, 1 Nov 2019, Baris Erkus wrote:
How does it appear on the generated PDF file?
Baris,
As (wet) rather than as (WET).
LyX has its own formatting of references, which is most of the time NOT
same as the bibtex format you are using.
I hadn't encountered this issue (and another I need
ences, which is most of the time NOT
same as the bibtex format you are using.
--
↓↓
Please bottom-post. Start your reply here:
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
I have a reference titled, Wetland Evaluation Technique (WET) and it's
entered in kbibtex with the abbreviation writte this way: ({WET}). But, when
entered in a LyX document the bibliography shows the abbreviation as (wet).
I thought the braces specified 'keep the text exactly as written' so I
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 11:14:48 AM PDT Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Thursday, August 29, 2019 5:44:13 AM PDT Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
> > Ok, thanks,
> >
> > please don't ask questions then, for which you don't like the answers.
>
> el,
>
> You answered my question days ago: select a
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 5:44:13 AM PDT Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
Ok, thanks,
please don't ask questions then, for which you don't like the answers.
el,
You answered my question days ago: select a different style or modify a .bst
file. I chose a different style.
Rich
el,
Right on. Thanks so much for answering my lyx questions over the years.
BTW, I am loving background! Still learning about it.
John
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 5:44:13 AM PDT Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
> Ok, thanks,
>
> please don't ask questions then, for which you don't like the
Ok, thanks,
please don't ask questions then, for which you don't like the answers.
el
On 29/08/2019 14:34, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2019, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
>
>> you really seem to not be getting it.
>
> Eberhard,
>
> We'll agree to disagree. I fully understand what you've
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
you really seem to not be getting it.
Eberhard,
We'll agree to disagree. I fully understand what you've written and have
neither need nor desire to futz any more with reference styles.
Documents I prepare are for clients, regulatory agencies, or
finding one that is acceptable is the most parsimonious
solution.
Google is your friend with regards to BibTeX. And perhaps you might take
the plunge and move to BibLaTeX which is said to be the future.
The bibtex docs do a very good job. As long as bibtex is supported and does
what I need (which only
Rich,
two separate issues (if you leave the soup out :-)-O).
Switching style will often solve issues, fixing the BST file will
definitively.
Google is your friend with regards to BibTeX. And perhaps you might take
the plunge and move to BibLaTeX which is said to be the future.
Of course did I
On Sun, 25 Aug 2019, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
You don't need to change the reference format.
El,
Actually, I do; at least the style as used by the LyX bibliography. Reading
the .bst files I saw that the authordate[1-4] follow the Chicago Manual of
Style, 13th Ed. (I have the 15th edition
You don't need to change the reference format.
You can modify the BST and put it somewhere where it will survive
upgrades. Depending on the search order of Texhash you might even be
able to keep the same name :-)-O
Tomorrow is a public holiday here (Heroes Day).
I am cooking Lentil Soup today
On Sun, 25 Aug 2019, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
shows
FUNCTION {emphasize}
{ duplicate$ empty$
{ pop$ "" }
{ "{\em " swap$ * "}" * }
if$
}
so if you replace that with
FUNCTION {emphasize}
{ duplicate$ empty$
Rich,
http://ctan.unsw.edu.au/biblio/bibtex/contrib/authordate/authordate3.bst
shows
FUNCTION {emphasize}
{ duplicate$ empty$
{ pop$ "" }
{ "{\em " swap$ * "}" * }
if$
}
so if you replace that wit
I did not write "in that director".
You are using gensymb.sty which is not included. I noticed it comes
from the was package which once can install with tlmgr. Remove this and
run again, just to be sure that this is not the cause, but it's hardly
likely to be.
Then you are using
On Sat, 24 Aug 2019, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
Don't look in the LyX source. send me the BST file that is being used, the
dabatase for the ciation and the STY file, together with the MWE.
el,
There is no BST file in that directory, only the .lyx file.
One of the JabRef devs responded to my
and you need to look at the BST
>> what
>> it shows there.
>
> Eberhard,
>
> It's either LaTeX or JabRef changing how it presents the bibtex entry to
> lyx.
>
>> Look for something like (from another style):
>>
>> FUNCTION {emphasize}
&g
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019, Johannes Böttcher wrote:
KOMA-Script got rid of the old font commands. Use the document option
"enabledeprecatedfontcommands" (from memory)
Johannes,
I had that as a class type option, but it broke other things. Because this
appeared only after I added a
or JabRef changing how it presents the bibtex entry to
> > lyx.
>
> This is most likely a JabRef issue so I've posted a question on their web
> forum about this and other changes.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rich
>
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019, Rich Shepard wrote:
It's either LaTeX or JabRef changing how it presents the bibtex entry to
lyx.
This is most likely a JabRef issue so I've posted a question on their web
forum about this and other changes.
Regards,
Rich
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
It's a LaTeX one, or rather a BST one and you need to look at the BST what
it shows there.
Eberhard,
It's either LaTeX or JabRef changing how it presents the bibtex entry to
lyx.
Look for something like (from another style):
FUNCTION
. I've created a new KOMA-Script report
> and used the JabRef -> LyX icon to insert a reference and bibliography
> reference. As a test I tried to preview the document only to have lyx tell
> me there are deprecated font types, e.g., \sc, in the bibtex entry.
>
> Looking at the b
me there are deprecated font types, e.g., \sc, in the bibtex entry.
Looking at the bibtex entry in JabRef I see expected ASCII text in bibtex
format. I tried exporting that entry but did not find a format that printed
in plain ASCII text. Sigh.
Here's the last few lines from lyx error log:
! Class scrreprt Er
Zitat von Baris Erkus :
On 20-Jul-19 4:41 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
I used bibtex so far but thought to switch to biblatex, since I
assumed it would handle diacritics better. However, I am unexperienced
and e.g. don't know how to get in the bibliography the surname, a
comma, and only
On 20-Jul-19 4:41 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> I used bibtex so far but thought to switch to biblatex, since I
> assumed it would handle diacritics better. However, I am unexperienced
> and e.g. don't know how to get in the bibliography the surname, a
> comma, and only the fir
Am Samstag, den 20.07.2019, 15:41 +0200 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
> example: Biblatex gives me
> in the setting (were and how do I change it??)
>
> Leis, Jeffrey M. and Siebeck, Ulrike and Dixson, Danielle L.
>
> I would, however, like to have it as
>
> Leis, J. M. and Siebeck, U. and
I used bibtex so far but thought to switch to biblatex, since I assumed
it would handle diacritics better. However, I am unexperienced and e.g.
don't know how to get in the bibliography the surname, a comma, and only
the first character of the prename with a ., example: Biblatex gives me
On 3/5/19 7:03 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
What is the way to set the basic bibtex in the last version of lyx?
Thank.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire
Hello,
What is the way to set the basic bibtex in the last version of lyx?
Thank.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne
9 Avenue
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018, Rich Shepard wrote:
That's interesting. I'll enter an author's name in JabRef, e.g.,
M{\:u}ller and in the LyX document the u will have its umlaut. I've not
before used {{\:u}}. Just for giggles I try both and see if there's a
difference.
Oops! s/:/"/g
Rich
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
I don't know of a difference. BibTeX uses (and Jabref adds) a pair of
braces to delimit the contents of each field, so in order to lock in a
verbatim name or an accented letter, you need another pair of braces
inside the first (which are not seen
On 08/29/2018 03:41 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Try putting braces around the author entry in JabRef (so that the BibTeX
source box reads "author = {{Soil Science Staff}}". Braces around
entries
in BibTeX generally mean "literally like th
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Try putting braces around the author entry in JabRef (so that the BibTeX
source box reads "author = {{Soil Science Staff}}". Braces around entries
in BibTeX generally mean "literally like this, don't screw with me".
Paul,
J
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Try putting braces around the author entry in JabRef (so that the BibTeX
source box reads "author = {{Soil Science Staff}}". Braces around entries
in BibTeX generally mean "literally like this, don't screw with me".
Paul,
Anyone know?
Rich
Try putting braces around the author entry in JabRef (so that the BibTeX
source box reads "author = {{Soil Science Staff}}". Braces around
entries in BibTeX generally mean "literally like this, don't screw with me".
Paul
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018, Rich Shepard wrote:
author = {Soil Science Staff},
But, when I link that entry into a LyX document it appears as "Staff
(1996)".
Well, ... I just learned something new. The pdflatex output has that entry
in the bibliography as "Staff, Soil Science ...".
A bibTeX entry in JabRef:
@Manual{NRCS1996,
title= {Keys to Soil Taxonomy},
author = {Soil Science Staff},
organization = {Natural Resource Conservation Service, US Department of
Agriculture},
edition = {7},
year = {1996},
abstract = {Characteristics
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018, Rich Shepard wrote:
The one place I did not check was the jabrefdb.bib file.
Made two more changes that should prevent this issue from recurring: in
~/.java/.userPrefs/net/sf/jabref/prefs.xml (and
../cutomizeBibtexTypes/prefs.xml I changed 'journaltitle' to 'journal.'
to it in the bibliography definition. LyX doesn't need to export it;
like image files, it's considered to be already there.
I still have to set up the BibTeX bibliography in the LyX document as
usual. The problem isn't with the citation, it's with the bibliography
entry. Assuming you are indeed using bibtex
not check was the jabrefdb.bib file. Opening that in
emacs I saw that the problem Helsel references had an entry for
'journaltitle' (the biblatex syntax), but other @Article entries displayed
the bibtex syntax of 'journal'. So, a quick global search-and-replace set
all @Article entries to 'journal,' 65
Am Donnerstag, den 08.02.2018, 08:35 -0800 schrieb Rich Shepard:
> 2.2.3 as of May 17, 2017.
Then it should work. Please check if you have an old stdciteformats.inc
file in your ~./lyx/layouts directory, and if so, remove that.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
> I use bibtex and that's the way both JabRef and LyX are configured.
> Yes, so does version 3.8.2 that I use and none of the 'quality' checks do
anything.
The Check Integrity function I use is in JabRef 4.1 (the latest).
I'd suggest making sure your bibtex file is 100% bibtex as follows:
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Which version of LyX is this? The journaltitle field is parsed by LyX as
of LyX 2.2.3. Earlier versions of LyX do not handle genuine biblatex
fields for the preview.
Jürgen,
2.2.3 as of May 17, 2017.
Rich
}.
There's no .bib file exported with the .tex file.
I still have to set up the BibTeX bibliography in the LyX document as
usual. The problem isn't with the citation, it's with the bibliography
entry. Assuming you are indeed using bibtex and not biblatex, it sounds as
if thek .bib file somehow got
Am Donnerstag, den 08.02.2018, 07:59 -0800 schrieb Rich Shepard:
> What I'm trying to understand is why it's not shown in the
> lyx document.
Which version of LyX is this? The journaltitle field is parsed by LyX
as of LyX 2.2.3. Earlier versions of LyX do not handle genuine biblatex
fields for
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018, Rich Shepard wrote:
I've checked each journal title field for unprintable characters and
re-written them but nothing makes a difference.
Allow me to re-interate the problem. JabRef's bibtex entry for one of the
(now 2) problem references is:
@Article{Helsel2006
Rich,
On 02/08/2018 10:18 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:
Paul,
If I remember correctly, 'journaltitle' is used with biblatex and
'journal' _should_ be used with bibtex.
Sounds correct to me.
Assuming you've exported your bibliography to a .bib file, try doing a
global search and replace
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018, Cris Fuhrman wrote:
If your JabRef format is biblatex, are you using LyX appropriately?
https://wiki.lyx.org/BibTeX/Biblatex
Chris,
No. I use bibtex and that's the way both JabRef and LyX are configured.
Otherwise, make sure you've updated to the latest Jabref.
I
Hi Rich,
If your JabRef format is biblatex, are you using LyX appropriately?
https://wiki.lyx.org/BibTeX/Biblatex
Otherwise, make sure you've updated to the latest Jabref. It has some tools
to validate the bib(la)tex files (Menu Quality > Check Integrity, and Menu
Quality > Cleanup e
= {...}".
Paul,
If I remember correctly, 'journaltitle' is used with biblatex and
'journal' _should_ be used with bibtex.
Assuming you've exported your bibliography to a .bib file, try doing a
global search and replace to change all instances of "journaltitle" to
"journal&
Am Donnerstag, den 08.02.2018, 10:09 -0500 schrieb Paul A. Rubin:
> I'm with Scott on this. I just checked a couple of .bib files from
> old
> papers. One used "Journal = {...}" and the other used "journal =
> {...}".
> I'm not sure why the capitalization was different, but I've never
> seen
>
On 02/08/2018 08:37 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
journaltitle = {Chemosphere},
I know nothing about this, but should this be "journal = " ?
Scott,
I wondered about this, but JabRef is set for bibtex, not biblatex,
and all
articles,
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
journaltitle = {Chemosphere},
I know nothing about this, but should this be "journal = " ?
Scott,
I wondered about this, but JabRef is set for bibtex, not biblatex, and all
articles, including the other two Helsel's in that se
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 01:10:38AM +, Rich Shepard wrote:
> journaltitle = {Chemosphere},
I know nothing about this, but should this be "journal = " ?
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
There's one citation in my document that's giving me fits. LyX tells me
that the journal name is missing, but it's present in the jabref bibtex
entry:
@Article{Helsel2006,
author = {Helsel, D.R.},
title= {Fabricating data: How substituting values for nondetects can
ruin
Wolfgang,
Thanks a lot for giving the BibTeX syntax rule... I have always (?) used
“Firstname Surname”…
-Bernt
From: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org [mailto:lyx-users@lists.lyx.org] On Behalf Of
Wolfgang Engelmann
Sent: torsdag 5. oktober 2017 16.26
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: LyX
Am 05.10.2017 um 16:19 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
Am 05.10.2017 um 15:55 schrieb Bernt Lie:
I use LyX 2.2.2 on 64 bits Windows 10. Should probably upgrade to the latest
LyX, but then again my set-up mostly works.
I'm using JabRef to handle BibTeX, and struggle to correctly handle
Am 05.10.2017 um 15:55 schrieb Bernt Lie:
I use LyX 2.2.2 on 64 bits Windows 10. Should probably upgrade to the latest
LyX, but then again my set-up mostly works.
I'm using JabRef to handle BibTeX, and struggle to correctly handle authors "Arthur
E. Bryson, Jr. and Yu-Chi Ho&qu
I use LyX 2.2.2 on 64 bits Windows 10. Should probably upgrade to the latest
LyX, but then again my set-up mostly works.
I'm using JabRef to handle BibTeX, and struggle to correctly handle authors
"Arthur E. Bryson, Jr. and Yu-Chi Ho". I use a Harvard reference style.
What is the c
bin <parubi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 06/10/2017 09:23 AM, David Pesetsky wrote:
>> Is there any way to have BibTex citations resolve correctly while editing
>> without having "BibTeX Generated Bibliography" constantly visible at the
>> bottom of the buffer.
On 06/10/2017 09:23 AM, David Pesetsky wrote:
Is there any way to have BibTex citations resolve correctly while editing without having
"BibTeX Generated Bibliography" constantly visible at the bottom of the buffer. I find
myself constantly going to the end of the buffer to continue
The two suggestions together appear to do exactly what I need — many thanks!
-David
> On Jun 10, 2017, at 9:39 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller <sp...@lyx.org> wrote:
>
> Am Samstag, den 10.06.2017, 13:23 + schrieb David Pesetsky:
>> Is there any way to have BibTex citations re
Am Samstag, den 10.06.2017, 13:23 + schrieb David Pesetsky:
> Is there any way to have BibTex citations resolve correctly while
> editing without having "BibTeX Generated Bibliography" constantly
> visible at the bottom of the buffer.
With a hack, yes (see below
Is there any way to have BibTex citations resolve correctly while editing
without having "BibTeX Generated Bibliography" constantly visible at the bottom
of the buffer. I find myself constantly going to the end of the buffer to
continue writing my document and having to hit the
Hello,
maybe that was too obvious… Everything works fine now.
Thank you
Jess
Jürgen Spitzmüller schrieb:
2017-03-20 13:59 GMT+01:00 jezZiFeR <jezzi...@gmail.com
<mailto:jezzi...@gmail.com>>:
Hello,
up to now I only used BibTeX-bibliographies in LyX. Now I would
t; »Am Anfang der ersten Zeile eines Absatzes werden Sie ein graues Kästchen
> mit einem Wort und einer Zahl in eckigen Klammern sehen.« /
> You will see a gray box in the first line of a paragraph with a word and a
> number in square brackets.
>
Do not use the bibliography environ
is very useful, thank you.
All best
Jess
Jürgen Spitzmüller <mailto:sp...@lyx.org>
20. März 2017 um 17:18
2017-03-20 13:59 GMT+01:00 jezZiFeR <jezzi...@gmail.com
<mailto:jezzi...@gmail.com>>:
Hello,
up to now I only used BibTeX-bibliographies in LyX. Now I wou
2017-03-20 13:59 GMT+01:00 jezZiFeR <jezzi...@gmail.com>:
> Hello,
>
> up to now I only used BibTeX-bibliographies in LyX. Now I would like to
> add titles to the bibliography, which I did not mention in the article. Is
> there a way to do that?
Yes, use \nocite* (or i
Hello,
up to now I only used BibTeX-bibliographies in LyX. Now I would like to
add titles to the bibliography, which I did not mention in the article.
Is there a way to do that? It would not mind to have the unmentioned
entries in a separate paragraph. Would be very helpful…
All best
Jess
. I no nothing about BibTeX, and I am confused by the
diversity
of programs and details concerning BibTeX. What could be the simplest way
of doing the conversion, and what exactly should I do, step by step,
to accomplish it?
Leslaw
Leslaw, could you send an example of one of your references (e.g
, that is the bibliography items are written
explicitely in the
LyX document, and referenced by numbers. However, in the
journal they want references by Author-year, and as far as I can
understand this can only be done by having the list of references
in *.bib files. I no nothing about BibTeX, and I am confused
rmat to plain
> everything works. I can also get it to work by tweaking with the authors’
> names (e.g. removing the second author). LyX, bib and pdf-files for a minimum
> example are enclosed.
>
> Don’t know if it is a bug in LyX, TeX, BibDesk, BibTeX or something else, but
>
g the second author). LyX, bib and pdf-files for a
> minimum example are enclosed.
>
> Don’t know if it is a bug in LyX, TeX, BibDesk, BibTeX or something else,
> but it is definitely the strangest bug I have seen for a long time…
> Any ideas of the cause?
>
It's not a bug but a f
It's working again. I re-installed LyX, but that didn't fix the problem. I
didn't want to re-install MikTeX for obvious reasons (it is working fine in
TeXStudio and it's slow to install).
Googling, I saw someone recommended using biber instead of bibtex in
Preferernces > Output >
with LyX/MikTeX and it is
working fine, so I'm certain it's the config of my machine. The LaTeX code
generated by LyX works fine in TeXStudio, so I think my MikTeX installation
is OK.
I tried LyX "Reconfigure" many times, but it seems to change nothing.
There are no BibTeX errors t
Thank you Charles.
I was afraid that I would have to use biblatex. I never seem to get it to
work properly but I'll try again.
On 12 September 2016 at 05:02, Charles de Miramon <
charlesdemira...@gmail.com> wrote:
> John Kane wrote:
>
> > Is there any relatively simple way to implement the
1 - 100 of 4603 matches
Mail list logo
