Hello,
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 12:09:10PM -0600, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. via mailop
wrote:
> Something has changed in the past several weeks so that email from Mailop now
> comes:
>
> From:
> To: mailop@mailop.org
>
> Whereas before the change the email would come:
>
> From: Anne Mitchell
>
Hello,
Are there any representatives of SpamCop here?
Last week or so I noticed that I can no longer send SpamCop reports
to a large hosting provider. The option now shows up as:
abuse#example@devnull.spamcop.net
with no explanatory text.
In the past when I have seen this, I have assumed
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:07:21AM -0700, Jay Hennigan via mailop wrote:
> On 8/27/19 03:54, Andy Smith via mailop wrote:
> >Last week or so I noticed that I can no longer send SpamCop reports
> >to a large hosting provider. The option now shows up as:
>
Hi Al,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 09:29:32AM -0500, Al Iverson via mailop wrote:
> You're new to a very old problem.
Yes it seems I am, as I've had a misunderstanding about SpamCop for
a really long time.
> I could probably find blog posts I wrote in 2003 complaining about
> how Spamcop chooses to
Hi Luis,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 04:54:20PM -0700, Luis E. Muñoz via mailop wrote:
> I guess I'm trying to say is that getting abuse complaints to the right
> hands, at scale, is way harder than it seems. "Streamlining" the process is
> hard,
No argument from me: no easy-seeming here! It's plain
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 06:12:36PM +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
> Dnia 7.10.2019 o godz. 16:22:32 Andrew C Aitchison via mailop pisze:
> > But the basic problem remains; an AI has decided it doesn't like you.
[…]
> That's why there always should be a human who is able to
Hi Alexander,
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 05:25:38PM +0200, Alexander Zeh via mailop wrote:
> > It would also be great if SendGrid would include an abuse reporting
> > URL in the headers of each message, specific to that message, i.e.
> > that passes along all info that SendGrid would need to
Hello,
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 06:00:44AM +0300, Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote:
> Any chance SendGrid might amend its ticket system so that there would
> be autoreplies when tickets are created that showed issue numbers
> connected with the original request
It would also be great if SendGrid
Hi Atro,
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 05:37:26PM +0300, Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 02:15:07PM +0000, Andy Smith via mailop wrote:
> > At present the process is to just forward the mail to
> > abuse@sendgrid. It's great that they accept reports that
Hello,
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 02:50:39PM -0700, Carl Byington via mailop wrote:
> It is bad enough that our local spamassassin rules add 5 points if the
> message is dkim signed by sendgrid.net.
Same here and it's extra frustrating because there is so much ham in
there as well. Just some
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 12:10:43AM +, Andy Smith via mailop wrote:
> What's the "this" you mention? My comment that I should fix up SPF?
Response to Hotmail ticket:
Not qualified for mitigation
85.119.80.238
Our investigation has determined that the above IP(s) d
Hi Michael,
Given that the recipient can't be bothered to either fix the problem
that's causing the alerts, nor hit the button that silences the
alerts, I'm guessing they won't take any action on their side. I'm
fine with them not receiving these emails in that case, but I don't
want wider block
Hi,
We have a customer who's been receiving Icinga (basically Nagios)
alerts every few hours for the last few days to their hotmail
address. The customer could/should have either addressed the
situation or halted the alerts, but they didn't and that's their
choice.
In the third day of this we've
Received: from wrqvhkqq.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net ([149.72.1.68])
by chiark.greenend.org.uk (SAUCE v0.9.0)
with esmtp id sauce-2544-1597663-1; 17 Aug 2020 11:32:54 + (GMT)
Message-ID: <20200817203728.96117de88be30...@chilitato.com>
From: "chiark.greenend.org.uk"
Subject:
Hello,
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 07:38:38AM -0400, micah anderson via mailop wrote:
> This can't be anything other than a pipeline for spammers, and it must
> work. I'm wondering if this can be shut down somehow, does it require
> policy changes at RIRs?
As an industry we haven't been massively
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 07:53:43PM +0800, Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
> On 2020-08-19 18:24:30 (+0800), Andreas Schamanek via mailop wrote:
> >BTW, Mailman mm_cfg.py option `SUBSCRIBE_FORM_SECRET` apparently mitigates
> >the DoS, too.
>
> We've also had some success in the past with
Hi,
Not sure if this is the best place to mention this, but…
Since yesterday I've been seeing a large number of attempted
subscriptions to all the public lists on one of my Mailman servers.
There's so far been 160 attempted subscriptions for 69 unique email addresses.
These addresses never
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 10:09:14AM -0700, Luis E. Muñoz via mailop wrote:
> On 20 Oct 2020, at 23:55, Andy Smith via mailop wrote:
> > Their mail server is at 85.119.83.252 (and 2001:ba8:1f1:f073::2, but
> > none of the eventual deliveries happen over IPv6).
>
> Are t
Hi,
I've got a customer running their own mail server who is
experiencing huge delays on *receiving* emails from btinternet.com
senders.
This is ongoing, and appears to be affecting all email to them from
all senders with a btinternet.com address. My customer is not
noticing any attempts by BT
Hi Tom,
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 11:48:56AM +0100, Tom Sommer via mailop wrote:
> I don't disagree with the fact that the "Junk" button is made of evil, which
> is also why we do not permanently ban or block anything based on it (like
> some other e-mail providers do).
Back in November 2020
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 08:25:57AM +0100, Rob Kendrick via mailop wrote:
> I gave up reporting abuse to Sendinblue 18 months ago. It was getting
> too much. A rare thing happened: everything from Sendinblue is refused
> for every customer. There have been no complaints.
I've had to
Hello,
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 12:16:29AM -0400, John Levine via mailop wrote:
> It appears that Michael Butler via mailop said:
> >It looks like google is no longer accepting spam reports; all my spamcop
> >submissions now fail with something like this in the log ..
>
> I send lots of abuse
Hi Mary,
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 11:25:06AM +0200, Mary via mailop wrote:
> Would it be possible for the two sides (blocklists and a
> cloud/hosting providers) to come together and have some kind of
> automated notification?
As a tiny hosting provider we already receive notifications from
Hi Michael,
Yes, 139.162.167.107 is no longer banned. Thanks to you and whoever
else had a hand in sorting that out!
Cheers,
Andy
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 05:08:41PM +, Michael Wise via mailop wrote:
> Pretty sure that file is long gone.
> And pretty sure that IP is now quite unblocked.
>
>
Hello,
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 06:52:20PM +0200, Mary via mailop wrote:
> We are still having problems with some IP addresses (Linode) that remain
> blocked by Microsoft and can't be unblocked by the
> del...@messaging.microsoft.com or the https://sender.office.com/ form.
>
> These are:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 08:12:13PM +, Andy Smith via mailop wrote:
> Forwarding the mail to del...@messaging.microsoft.com so far hasn't
> produced a response but it's only been a short while.
Did eventually get an auto response from
del...@messaging.microsoft.com with a do-not-reply a
Hello,
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 03:25:45PM -0600, Anne Mitchell via mailop wrote:
> does anyone here even accept email from [MailJet] any more?
> Anybody see legitimate email coming through Mailjet
It's been pretty bad so we're scoring anything from
AS200069 and AS396479 +3.4 in SpamAssassin
Why on Earth is Mailchimp allowing any client to send email with a
header like this? (Rhetorical question)
To: "Attached notify/ Hi Customer More 4759 USD on your Tron link
TRX account /// You private key "5.)seven 6.)fiber 3.)atom
4.)trial 7.)echo 9.)lock 1.)arch 2.)crime" "10.)day
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 03:38:05PM -0700, Robert L Mathews via mailop wrote:
> see https://postmaster.yahooinc.com/error-codes
>
> According to that page,
>
> "- These errors indicate that the domain used to the right of the @ in the
> MAIL FROM does not appear to be a real domain.
> - We
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 11:26:25AM +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
> Dnia 11.07.2023 o godz. 09:05:42 Laura Atkins via mailop pisze:
> > B2B email requires a MX (like, if you don’t have an MX do you even email?)
>
> TECHNICALLY,
[…]
> These are Google requirements, not SMTP
Hello,
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 10:18:26AM +, Louis Laureys via mailop wrote:
> I was with you until it was revealed you mention a blacklist in
> your response. Sendgrid assumes that the words in the response
> actually have something to do with the reason it's being
> temporarily rejected
Hi Dmytro,
On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 02:28:33PM +0100, Dmytro Homoniuk via mailop wrote:
> 450 4.3.2 Local problem - couldn't query foobar blacklist
>
> I do think this very hypothetical example is a bit of an outlier. It's
> providing non-actionable information to the sending system: it should
Hi,
Let's say I have domain example.com with SPF, DKIM and DMARC
records. I've put an A record in there to point foo.bar.example.com
at someone else's IP address.
Probably some cron job or other automated task on that host has sent
an email from usern...@foo.bar.example.com that has ended up at
Hi Todd,
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 09:31:58AM -0400, Todd Herr via mailop wrote:
> Yes, the DMARC protocol does describe the search for the organizational
> domain for the RFC5322.From domain in an email message.
Yep, got itnow; I want the subdomain policy ("sp"). Not sure how I
missed that, or
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 08:03:40PM +0200, Carsten Schiefner via mailop wrote:
> how about elaborating a bit further on the whats and whys of your setup?
Maybe some of us could learn something from that, or maybe SendGrid
would consider that to be giving an advantage to competitors. Really
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 12:27:55PM +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
> I am always wondering - as Gmail gives so many problems that have been
> discussed multiple times - why anybody who has another mail account would
> want to use Gmail, and moreover - have his mail forwarded to Gmail?
Hello,
On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 07:00:34AM +0100, Marco Moock via mailop wrote:
> Am Thu, 8 Feb 2024 17:10:57 +
> schrieb Andy Smith via mailop :
>
> > Last month there was a complaint on the NANOG (North American
> > Network Operator's Group) that changing the sub
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 02:44:43PM +0100, Sebastian Nielsen via mailop wrote:
> >> it basically makes it impossible to respond to the original email sender
>
> Nope, you just open the encapsulated email (open the .EML attachment), and
> respond to that.
Going back to my anecdote that last
Hello,
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 01:01:58PM +0200, Taavi Eomäe via mailop wrote:
> > And it seems none of the extra requirements do anything against
> spam, because the spammers can (and do, see above) easily implement
> all of those.
>
> I get the impression you can't see the forest for the
Hello,
On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 10:45:04AM +0100, Benny Pedersen via mailop wrote:
> Marco Moock via mailop skrev den 2023-12-17 09:00:
> > If they use forwarders, SPF will fail in the case the envelope sender
> > isn't rewritten. Check your logs for that.
>
> false, every forwarder changes
Hi,
While trying to debug:
<[redacted]@yahoo.co.uk>: host mx-eu.mail.am0.yahoodns.net[188.125.72.74] said:
554 5.7.9 Message not accepted for policy reasons. See
https://postmaster.yahooinc.com/error-codes (in reply to end of
DATA command)
I and others note that
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 12:54:13PM +0200, Mary via mailop wrote:
> X-mail_abuse_inquiries: http://www.salesforce.com/company/abuse.jsp
I reported a similar phishing spam to Salesforce a few days ago. I
can't believe in this day and age that the above URL in its first
paragraph on how to
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 04:29:30PM +0100, Raymond Dijkxhoorn via mailop wrote:
> > > Most organisations will reconsider after beeing blocked a few times due to
> > > non COI
>
> > But not the likes of SendGrid, Mailgun, Mailjet, ? which also makes
> > making the argument much more
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 03:53:10PM +0100, Raymond Dijkxhoorn via mailop wrote:
> > Bill wrote:
> > If sending lots of mail to weakly engaged corespondents is your core
> > business, COI is not likely to be worthwhile in cold hard cash vs. what
> > I call "good faith single opt-in"
[…]
>
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 09:58:17AM +0100, Cyril - ImprovMX via mailop wrote:
> Unfortunately for us, Spamcop believe we are the one sending spam when they
> trace back the Received headers, because we are the last hop before landing
> to that user's inbox.
>
> Is there a way to tell in the
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 01:39:46PM -0800, Mark Fletcher via mailop wrote:
> My question to you all is, do you think that the List-Unsubscribe=One-Click
> header is supported well enough these days such that I can replace the
> one-click unsub link in the message bodies with a link that
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 05:23:22PM +, Gareth Evans via mailop wrote:
> (Error NOERROR looking up 23.24.6.165 PTR,Error Error NXDOMAIN looking
> up 23-24-6-165-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. A looking up
> 23-24-6-165-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. A,Error Error NXDOMAIN looking
Hello,
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 09:12:43AM +0100, Marco Moock via mailop wrote:
> Am 04.03.2024 um 02:25:08 Uhr schrieb Gareth Evans via mailop:
> > From
> >
> > https://www.mailop.org/best-practices
> >
> > "Having SPF for your own domains is usually considered a weak signal
> > ..."
> >
> >
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 12:48:25AM +, Alexander Huynh via mailop wrote:
> Would you consider your own /64 or /48 from RIPE?
The Local Internet Registry (sponsoring ISP) will charge you
something (recurring) for managing the Provider Independent
allocation.
If the need is only for one
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 04:56:29PM +0100, Marco Moock via mailop wrote:
> Is there a reason for changing the content of the mail AND keeping the
> original DKIM signature?
>
> Wouldn't it be better to remove that and add mailop's own DKIM
> signature, that will pass?
Not speaking for the
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 01:30:53PM +0100, Sebastian Nielsen via mailop wrote:
> when the mail client tries to display the crap in the name field,
> it causes it to crash. Guess it tries to render Emoji in a field
> that is not designed to accept Emoji, thus it just silentcrash
> into desktop.
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 11:51:10PM +, Andrew C Aitchison via mailop wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2024, John Levine via mailop wrote:
> > Everywhere else people use ASCII mail addresses, even though they are
> > often writing mail in non-ASCII character sets.
>
> I get plenty of non-ASCII
52 matches
Mail list logo
