Bihlmaier Andreas wrote:
## openssl speed aes-128-cbc
type 16 bytes 64 bytes256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes
aes-128 cbc 17311.15k18319.00k18569.35k18893.09k 18765.02k
## openssl speed aes-256-cbc
type 16 bytes 64 bytes256 bytes
On 6/21/06, Benjamin Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I expect the tool to do if I invoke it like
$ sudo pkg_add -u
is to do this (from pkg_add(1)):
If no pkgname is given, pkg_add will update all installed packages.
What actually happens after the above invocation is what Sebastian
I have installes OpenBSD 3.8. I exported a directory with
/mnt/gamma -maproot=root 192.168.1.14
line in /etc/exports
Next I tested the server with Nessus vulnerability scaner and it found a
hole in NFS:
---
The remote NFS server allows users to use a 'cd ..' command
to access other directories
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Martin Marusak wrote:
I have installes OpenBSD 3.8. I exported a directory with
/mnt/gamma -maproot=root 192.168.1.14
line in /etc/exports
Next I tested the server with Nessus vulnerability scaner and it found a
hole in NFS:
---
The remote NFS server allows users
Adrian Close schrieb:
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Justin Blackmore wrote:
Im running several OpenBSD 3.9 VM's on a GSX server and the clocks on
the OBSD vm's drift pretty bad, the real time host hardware clock is
How much drift? The guest hardware clock generally won't be stable
enough for NTP
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 05:26:51PM -0700, prad wrote:
i'm running koffice which wants postgre8.1.3
but i want to use postgre8.1.4 (not sure why other than because the postgre
site told me to)
however, when i pkg_add we get a conflict with the postgresql-client-8.1.3
which has already
I have installes OpenBSD 3.8. I exported a directory with
/mnt/gamma -maproot=root 192.168.1.14
line in /etc/exports
Next I tested the server with Nessus vulnerability scaner and it found a
hole in NFS:
[...]
This seems like an old (1999) hole. Is there any patch for it or did I do
anything
I have a quick question.
I want to try to setup a vpn gateway. It would need vpn connections with
several clients (using the same subnets!!). I want to somehow map
each vpn connection to another IP range, so we can contact all networks at
the same time.
I think I can accomplish this using NAT or
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 02:45:01PM +1000, Adrian Close wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Justin Blackmore wrote:
Im running several OpenBSD 3.9 VM's on a GSX server and the clocks on
the OBSD vm's drift pretty bad, the real time host hardware clock is
How much drift? The guest hardware clock
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 09:18:14AM +0200, Dries Schellekens wrote:
Bihlmaier Andreas wrote:
## openssl speed aes-128-cbc
type 16 bytes 64 bytes256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192
bytes
aes-128 cbc 17311.15k18319.00k18569.35k18893.09k 18765.02k
## openssl
Bihlmaier Andreas wrote:
I dont mean to offend you, but ...
Doh, I know that and these are VERY nice figures, BUT my problem is
that I have to slow (== no acceleration) speed in IPSEC.
I thought that OPenBSD would just make use of it (again in IPSEC) if it
detects it.
IPSEC always uses the
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 13:48 +0200, Bihlmaier Andreas wrote:
I dont mean to offend you, but ...
Doh, I know that and these are VERY nice figures, BUT my problem is
that I have to slow (== no acceleration) speed in IPSEC.
I thought that OPenBSD would just make use of it (again in IPSEC) if it
some email detect spam also most importan email ,so how to restore
email in /var/virusmail/xxx because taht email is important.
also any body have some tip to make amavisd-new in openbsd 3.9 most
faster working because they a lot delay when send and receive with
attachment.
my regard
You can,
At 04:54 PM 6/20/06, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Bryan Irvine wrote:
Works ok for me. Hasn't crashed or anything like that. I use mysql 5 on
OpenBSD that some web apps talk too. I just did an import of a previous
dump, and it took somewhere in the neighboorhood of 7 hours give or take.
(for a few
sonjaya schrieb:
some email detect spam also most importan email ,so how to restore
email in /var/virusmail/xxx because taht email is important.
also any body have some tip to make amavisd-new in openbsd 3.9 most
faster working because they a lot delay when send and receive with
attachment.
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 09:29:24PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Bihlmaier Andreas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I stumbled across a problem with all X terminal emulators in OpenBSD
(that is xterm and aterm, eterm and rxvt from ports).
None of the above seems to support 256 colors. I
Frans Haarman wrote:
I have a quick question.
I want to try to setup a vpn gateway. It would need vpn connections with
several clients (using the same subnets!!). I want to somehow map
each vpn connection to another IP range, so we can contact all networks at
the same time.
I think I can
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 02:24:18PM +0200, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 13:48 +0200, Bihlmaier Andreas wrote:
I dont mean to offend you, but ...
Doh, I know that and these are VERY nice figures, BUT my problem is
that I have to slow (== no acceleration) speed in IPSEC.
I
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 04:30:20PM +0200, Guido Tschakert wrote:
sonjaya schrieb:
some email detect spam also most importan email ,so how to restore
email in /var/virusmail/xxx because taht email is important.
also any body have some tip to make amavisd-new in openbsd 3.9 most
faster
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 08:23:11PM +0700, sonjaya wrote:
You can, however, configure amavisd to save pretty much exactly what you
want to a temporary directory. As to the tmp directory and the directory
amavisd saves to, set up a cron job to clean it out unless you want to
do so manually (I
Hello list,
Just an FYI on the B1 revision of the D-Link DGE-530T.
I recently purchased another D-Link DGE-530T and noticed when I got it
home that it is a Rev B1 card, unlike all my others which are Rev A1.
The Rev B1 card is not shown in the dmesg and thus does not yet work.
The chips on the
Hi,
How to change HDD parameters like this:
wd1 at pciide0 channel 1 drive 0: FUJITSU MPD3084AT
wd1: 16-sector PIO, LBA, 8063MB, 16514064 sectors
wd1(pciide0:1:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2
to get rid off the crashes I register several times a day? With very bad
results on my files.
Bihlmaier Andreas wrote:
I use iperf -w 256k for testing purposes.
The speed between hosts/router using their real IPs (-B 10.0.0.*) is
about 70-80 Mb/s.
~22 Mb/s between host1 and host2 using their VPN IPs.
Hope this made some stuff more clear.
Thanks everyone for helping, I hope this can
My doubts may seem fool, so thanks in advance for those who will read
this e-mail and may help me with my doubts.
1. Why doesn't passwd ask superuser's current password when it's run
by the superuser to change its own password? May not it be considered
a serious security flaw?
2. Why doesn't
Hello,
I have a question about firewall rules on openbsd. Should I ask here for
help?
Tony
Hi,
I'm trying to modify my outgoing Message-Id, with my mailer MUA (mutt) I can
configure this. However when I try to use mail(1) it does not update the
Message-Id, I read a bit in the source and it doesn't seem to be set in
mail(1), and a ktrace shows that it pipes everything to sendmail
My doubts may seem fool, so thanks in advance for those who will read
this e-mail and may help me with my doubts.
1. Why doesn't passwd ask superuser's current password when it's run
by the superuser to change its own password? May not it be considered
a serious security flaw?
Oh come on.
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 10:12:53AM -0600, Leung, Tony wrote:
I have a question about firewall rules on openbsd. Should I ask here for
help?
Here is a good place, and there's also a pf mailing list as well
(pf@benzedrine.cx).
You may want to see if your questions have already been answered by
Would it be possible that the installer asks if you may wanna use the NIC
for pppoe-Connections and then maybe also asks for User/PW for the
connection-settings? :)
In my oppinion this little change may would maybe bring more usebillity
(or how that`s written...) and it would save some time wich
Joco Salvatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Why doesn't passwd ask superuser's current password when it's run
by the superuser to change its own password? May not it be considered
a serious security flaw?
No, it may not. Why would that matter at all?
2. Why doesn't the system ask the
Joco Salvatti wrote:
Let's suppose an attacker entered the room where an OpenBSD server is
located in, and by mistake the system administrator has forgotten to
logout the root login session. So the attacker could enter in single
user mode, without the need for the root password, and load a
On 6/21/06, Joco Salvatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's suppose an attacker entered the room where an OpenBSD server is
why didn't you lock the door?
located in, and by mistake the system administrator has forgotten to
logout the root login session. So the attacker could enter in single
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 02:23:20PM -0300, Joco Salvatti wrote:
My doubts may seem fool, so thanks in advance for those who will read
this e-mail and may help me with my doubts.
1. Why doesn't passwd ask superuser's current password when it's run
by the superuser to change its own password?
Thanks for all.
On 6/21/06, Peter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that when you've given an attacker physical access to a machine with a
root session open, there's not a whole lot OpenBSD (or any OS) can do... The
attacker could also, with physical, attach a keystroke logger, unplug
* Joco Salvatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-21 11:38]:
My doubts may seem fool, so thanks in advance for those who will read
this e-mail and may help me with my doubts.
1. Why doesn't passwd ask superuser's current password when it's run
by the superuser to change its own password? May not it
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 10:12:53AM -0600, Leung, Tony wrote:
Hello,
I have a question about firewall rules on openbsd. Should I ask here for
help?
You can ask here or you can ask on pf@benzedrine.cx just make sure you
do your research first.
--
Terry
http://tyson.homeunix.org
I don't like this idea. I think it is the wrong assumption that most
machines run PPPoE. The folks that use this can easily update the appropriate
files after the initial install is complete.
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 07:45:45PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be possible that the
That's why I always hardware hack my servers with a fragmentation
grenade. And, for good measure, anti-personnel mines underneath the
raised flooring.
On 6/21/06, Dries Schellekens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nonce someone has physical access, all is lost with current hardware.
--
Try to do
Em Qua, 2006-06-21 as 10:15 -0300, Pedro Martelletto escreveu:
please add a -p too, that would make the output be in pink
and a -b to blink while at it
you know, it's hard to script that
You are a joke Pedro Martelletto.
I remember you, other day, asking for a stupid howto for squid,
and
Joco Salvatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's suppose an attacker entered the
room where an OpenBSD server is
located in,
Most would argue that at this point you've already lost the security game.
So the attacker could enter in single
user mode, without the need for the root
password,
He
On 6/21/06, Gabriel Puliatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/21/06, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My doubts may seem fool, so thanks in advance for those who will read
this e-mail and may help me with my doubts.
1. Why doesn't passwd ask superuser's current password when it's run
Joco Salvatti wrote:
My doubts may seem fool, so thanks in advance for those who will read
this e-mail and may help me with my doubts.
1. Why doesn't passwd ask superuser's current password when it's run
by the superuser to change its own password? May not it be considered
a serious security
You are a joke
No, the only people who are jokes around here are those who don't help
improve things. Some think they can go futher, and are complete assholes.
Can we please focus on technology improvements?
I think that when you've given an attacker physical access to a machine with a
root session open, there's not a whole lot OpenBSD (or any OS) can do... The
attacker could also, with physical, attach a keystroke logger, unplug your
machine, or any number of other bad/humorous things I'm not
Em Qua, 2006-06-21 as 15:12 -0300, Douglas Santos escreveu:
Em Qua, 2006-06-21 as 10:15 -0300, Pedro Martelletto escreveu:
please add a -p too, that would make the output be in pink
and a -b to blink while at it
you know, it's hard to script that
You are a joke Pedro Martelletto.
Frank Bax wrote:
Actually, the option is really --disable-keys. The --opt option is just
a shorthand for several options (including --disable-keys).
There is more as well and refer to the man page for all the details:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/mysqldump.html
The --opt
Doesn't
Wouldn't this be the main reason to use sudo?
On 6/21/06, Joco Salvatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for all.
On 6/21/06, Peter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that when you've given an attacker physical access to a machine
with a root session open, there's not a whole lot
Hi,
since upgrading from 3.8 to 3.9, my firewall (which has one Netgear
FA311v1) from time to time spews this:
May 31 13:46:33 gryphon /bsd: sis0: watchdog timeout
Jun 2 20:31:11 gryphon /bsd: sis0: watchdog timeout
Jun 2 22:25:12 gryphon /bsd: sis0: watchdog timeout
Jun 3 15:40:17 gryphon
Douglas Santos wrote:
You are a joke Pedro Martelletto.
You are the person adding a stupid extra flag to ifconfig, while Pedro
is working on very useful stuff like VFS and file system support.
Cheers,
Dries
Because I know some peoples here own DELL Notebooks:
It happened that such a notebook explode.
The little storry is avaiable at The Inquirer
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=32550
Would be very bad if such stuff would happen if you4ve ya Notebook on ya
knees or so...
Kind regards,
Sebastian
Hi,
This is not really worth the bug report; I'm thinking a template file of
/etc/resolv.conf.tail in the default system would be a great thing. This
file is used by the dhclient script, here is a sample:
# /etc/resolv.conf.tail is appended to /etc/resolv.conf by dhclient script.
# A sample
I don't like this idea. I think it is the wrong assumption that most
machines run PPPoE. The folks that use this can easily update the
appropriate
files after the initial install is complete.
It`s the same assumption like asking the guy who installs OpenBSd if he
wanna use dhcp. :-)
I wont
Quoting Jared Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That's why I always hardware hack my servers with a fragmentation
grenade. And, for good measure, anti-personnel mines underneath the
raised flooring.
I prefer to have the doors automatically locked and then have the halon
deployed.
Much cleaner. ;
thus [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:
Because I know some peoples here own DELL Notebooks:
It happened that such a notebook explode.
The little storry is avaiable at The Inquirer
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=32550
Would be very bad if such stuff would happen if you4ve ya Notebook on ya
knees
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 09:03:43PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't like this idea. I think it is the wrong assumption that most
machines run PPPoE. The folks that use this can easily update the
appropriate
files after the initial install is complete.
It`s the same assumption
Okay, I read the threads on misc@ and I'm still confused.
The XF4 patch (3_9.002) says:
Apply by doing:
cd /usr/src/XF4
patch -p0 002_xorg.patch
The website (http://openbsd.org/anoncvs.html) says:
# cd /usr
# tar xzf XF4.tar.gz
which puts XF4 in /usr/XF4
Should I
Because portmap(8) dynamically assigns the mountd(8) port, how would
one write a pass rule in pf for mountd(8) traffic? My problem is that
every time mountd(8) is re/started, it operates on a different port and
my fixed pf rules block the mount protocol and, consequently, my
clients cannot mount
Nick Guenther wrote:
On 6/13/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006/06/13 22:07, Nick Guenther wrote:
What is the prefered method for NAT-traversal these days? The options
I know are:
UPnP
I suppose this one doesn't work unless the protocol bends well to it,
and both ends
You are not alone with watchdog timeouts on sis(sis0 at pci0 dev 4 function 0
SiS 900 10/100BaseTX rev 0x91).
For now I switched to fxp.
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 20:49, Martin Schrvder wrote:
Hi,
since upgrading from 3.8 to 3.9, my firewall (which has one Netgear
FA311v1) from time to time
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 11:54:37AM -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
IMNSHO, a root password for single user makes the system *LESS*
secure, and I'm dead serious. I would object to any attempt to commit
changes to OpenBSD to have one by default. Why? Real simple: *because
you asked this
Matt Van Mater wrote:
I ran into a very similar (maybe same) problem here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=113236417207016w=2
I have not found a solution to my problem yet unfortunately. One
thing I noticed is that my an0 card worked just find in 3.7 and 3.8
broke it, you might
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 06:49:09PM +0200, Dries Schellekens wrote:
Bihlmaier Andreas wrote:
I use iperf -w 256k for testing purposes.
The speed between hosts/router using their real IPs (-B 10.0.0.*) is
about 70-80 Mb/s.
~22 Mb/s between host1 and host2 using their VPN IPs.
Hope this
it doesn't matter. you can drop XF4 anywhere that's convenient. just
follow simple instructions in release(8) and it works.
On 6/21/06, Jack J. Woehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, I read the threads on misc@ and I'm still confused.
The XF4 patch (3_9.002) says:
Apply by doing:
cd
Hi,
I asked exactly the same question a couple of weeks ago, by the time
the patch was released. You should be able to find the answers to
your question in the archives ;-)
kind regards,
Tobias W.
On Jun 21, 2006, at 10:56 PM, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
Okay, I read the threads on misc@ and
On Jun 21, 2006, at 3:44 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
it doesn't matter. you can drop XF4 anywhere that's convenient. just
follow simple instructions in release(8) and it works.
Thanks, Ted. From release(8):
$ cd XF4SRC cvs up -r TAG -Pd
Is the revision tag for XF4 the same as the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be possible that the installer asks if you may wanna use the NIC
for pppoe-Connections and then maybe also asks for User/PW for the
connection-settings? :)
In my oppinion this little change may would maybe bring more usebillity
(or how that`s written...) and
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 06:49:09PM +0200, Dries Schellekens wrote:
Bihlmaier Andreas wrote:
I use iperf -w 256k for testing purposes.
The speed between hosts/router using their real IPs (-B 10.0.0.*) is
about 70-80 Mb/s.
~22 Mb/s between host1 and host2 using their VPN IPs.
Hope this
On 6/21/06, Jack J. Woehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ cd XF4SRC cvs up -r TAG -Pd
Is the revision tag for XF4 the same as the corresponding OpenBSD release
(in this
case OPENBSD_3_9)?
yes, all tags are matched.
Because portmap(8) dynamically assigns the mountd(8) port, how would
one write a pass rule in pf for mountd(8) traffic? My problem is that
every time mountd(8) is re/started, it operates on a different port and
my fixed pf rules block the mount protocol and, consequently, my
clients cannot
Can anyone help here?
Ive played wih fcntl's FD_CLOEXEC and what not.. it was set to 0, and yeah...
If someone can help solve this mystery then there is one less file required in
the chroot environment. A cleaner scponly shell :)
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 09:41, Joshua Sandbrook wrote:
Gidday
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 07:22:28PM +0200, Peter Philipp wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to modify my outgoing Message-Id, with my mailer MUA (mutt) I can
configure this. However when I try to use mail(1) it does not update the
Message-Id, I read a bit in the source and it doesn't seem to be set in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be possible that the installer asks if you may wanna use the
NIC
for pppoe-Connections and then maybe also asks for User/PW for the
connection-settings? :)
In my oppinion this little change may would maybe bring more
usebillity
(or how that`s written...)
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 09:03:43PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't like this idea. I think it is the wrong assumption that
most
machines run PPPoE. The folks that use this can easily update the
appropriate
files after the initial install is complete.
It`s the same assumption
!---Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] autoresponder--
Do you want it done right, fast or cheap? Pick two...
If you have been trying to use my services and I have been un responsive, I
have been helping a friend try to save his farm. Please click here to learn
more.
On 6/21/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like:
Wich device should be used for pppoe? [fxp0] :
pppoe protocol? [bla]:
User ID for pppoe: foo
Password for pppoe: bar
PPPOE-Successfully configured and useable after reboot
Just like:
Start sshd? [Yes]:
how many people run sshd?
On 6/21/06, Miod Vallat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have installes OpenBSD 3.8. I exported a directory with
/mnt/gamma -maproot=root 192.168.1.14
line in /etc/exports
Next I tested the server with Nessus vulnerability scaner and it found a
hole in NFS:
[...]
This seems like an old (1999)
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 01:03:33AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I did nto asked to add the pppoe-Code but to add a little mask into the
| installer to create the hostname.pppoe.
|
| Like:
|
| Wich device should be used for pppoe? [fxp0] :
| pppoe protocol? [bla]:
| User ID for pppoe: foo
|
We have found a blade 1000 for Jason in Washington DC (thanks) but
are still trying to find one for Mark Kettenis in the Netherlands.
If someone can help, please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks.
On 6/21/06, Nick Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is it like this though? Seems like if you tell it to export
/mnt/gamma you want it to export /mnt/gamma, not /mnt.
because the only thing that identifies a file is a number. every file
has a number. guess the number, and now you can open
| Wich device should be used for pppoe? [fxp0] :
| pppoe protocol? [bla]:
I can add ppooe to the floppy, but to make it fit I am going to
have to remove the fxp driver.
OK?
--- Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Here is a good place, and there's also a pf mailing list as well
(pf@benzedrine.cx).
...
Is this mailing list still active? I subscribed about a month
ago and have yet to receive a single e-mail.
The archives show no messages after Nov '05.
I was hoping to get some suggestions on the best way to handle this. We just
put a DSL line for inet backup and I'd like to have it automagically
failover.
We are running OpenBSD 3.9 -stable on a box with four interfaces. Currently
we have one interface connected to our private network and one
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 05:41:27PM -0700, Allen Theobald wrote:
--- Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Here is a good place, and there's also a pf mailing list as well
(pf@benzedrine.cx).
...
Is this mailing list still active? I subscribed about a month
ago and have yet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
The dmesg with the B1 card only lacks the three appropriate lines which
appear for the Rev A1 card when it is inserted in the same PCI slot:
IF that is true, your card wasn't inserted properly.
PCI cards show up. SOMETHING will show up...even if it isn't
On 6/21/06, John Brahy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are my other options? I'd like to have it automatically fail over but
I'm not sure what is required to do that.
Have you considered using a WAN card for your T1 natively on OpenBSD?
As well, you might have a look at ifstated(8) if that's the
Bob Beck wrote:
...
IMNSHO, a root password for single user makes the system *LESS*
secure, and I'm dead serious. I would object to any attempt to commit
changes to OpenBSD to have one by default. Why? Real simple: *because
you asked this question*. - Now I'm not just crapping on you,
Nick Holland wrote:
Bob Beck wrote:
...
IMNSHO, a root password for single user makes the system *LESS*
secure, and I'm dead serious. I would object to any attempt to commit
changes to OpenBSD to have one by default. Why? Real simple: *because
you asked this question*. - Now I'm
Przemys3aw Pawe3czyk wrote:
Hi,
How to change HDD parameters like this:
wd1 at pciide0 channel 1 drive 0: FUJITSU MPD3084AT
wd1: 16-sector PIO, LBA, 8063MB, 16514064 sectors
wd1(pciide0:1:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2
to get rid off the crashes I register several times a day? With
Hello Nick,
Quoting Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
The dmesg with the B1 card only lacks the three appropriate lines which
appear for the Rev A1 card when it is inserted in the same PCI slot:
IF that is true, your card wasn't inserted properly.
I saved
On 6/21/06, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/21/06, Nick Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is it like this though? Seems like if you tell it to export
/mnt/gamma you want it to export /mnt/gamma, not /mnt.
because the only thing that identifies a file is a number. every file
has
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
The dmesg with the B1 card only lacks the three appropriate lines which
appear for the Rev A1 card when it is inserted in the same PCI slot:
IF that is true, your card wasn't inserted
__
Verschicken Sie romantische, coole und witzige Bilder per SMS!
Jetzt bei WEB.DE FreeMail: http://f.web.de/?mc=021193
Hi,
I have a problem with re0 Realtek 8169 Network card and OpenBSD 3.9. When
OpenBSD starts up, it recognizes the card, I can configure IP address... But
ifconfig -m re0 shows: none as the only available media option.
the part of dmesg where the re0 is initialized:
re0 at pci0 dev 13 function
Well it is a simple ruleset (see below). As for the ISP blocking stuff -
not likely, since the email server is run by me at another location. Since
I have more users connecting to this server from other locations I've ruled
the problem out from that end. It is only from this one location that
94 matches
Mail list logo
