Re: bgpd.conf rules changed?

2022-12-27 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi Claudio, On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 01:10:15PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: > You update from a very old version of OpenBGPD. true. Your tips worked a treat, though, and adjusting the config wasn't too difficult. Thanks a lot, Toni

bgpd.conf rules changed?

2022-12-19 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, I am trying to upgrade an OpenBSD based BGP router from an old version to 7.2. But on OpenBSD 7.2, the config file results in several errors, despite the man page not indicating any thing "obvious". Eg. I get syntax errors on softreconfig in yes softreconfig out yes announce self

Re: carp + 5.1/5.2 woes [PARTIALLY SOLVED]

2013-01-03 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, thanks for the insight. On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 01:37:38AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2013-01-02, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote: /bsd: in6_ifloop_request: ADD operation failed for 3ffe:3ffe::0001 (errno=17) 17 is EEXIST - see errno(2) for a list of these - there's

carp + 5.1/5.2 woes

2013-01-02 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, I have a setup with three machines, all i386, and all plugged into one switch: A: 5.1 (IPv4: master) B: 5.0 (IPv4: backup) C: 5.2 (IPv4: master, IPv6: backup) Each host has two IPv4 carp interfaces, all on one interface (carp0 and carp1), and host C has an additional carp2 with only an

Re: carp + 5.1/5.2 woes

2013-01-02 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 04:53:02PM +0100, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: Le Wed, 2 Jan 2013 13:39:25 +0100, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net a écrit : With this setup, carp1 will stay in BACKUP mode when I say ifconfig carp1 advskew 120 on A, while on B, it would go into MASTER

Re: carp + 5.1/5.2 woes

2013-01-02 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 05:47:23PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2013-01-02, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote: A: 5.1 (IPv4: master) B: 5.0 (IPv4: backup) C: 5.2 (IPv4: master, IPv6: backup) Is this 5.0 release or is it something close to 5.0? the (working!) 5.0

Re: carp + 5.1/5.2 woes [PARTIALLY SOLVED]

2013-01-02 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, I have just discovered that I made a configuration error that had resulted in the undesired, but correct, carp behaviour for IPv4. Ie, OpenBSD operates as desired for this case. That leaves these questions open: On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 01:39:25PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: I also have

ISAKMPD question: ID-type ASN1_...?

2012-01-04 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, I've run into an interoperability problem with an Astaro, which does not like our certificate. The certificate basically looks like ... Subject: C=DE, L=..., CN=IP-number ... Subject Alternative Name: IPv4 Address: IP-number ... Now the Astaro is said to require an ID type of ASN1-DN,

Re: ISAKMPD question: certificates shipped?

2011-12-21 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi Stu, On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 11:24:24AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: I don't see any code changes that would result in a different presentation order of certificates between 4.8 and 5.0.. tcpdump traces of the negotiation from 4.8 and 5.0 might be useful, as might logs from the 3rd

ISAKMPD question: certificates shipped?

2011-11-30 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, I'm running into a problem with OpenBSD 5.0 and isakmpd. A config that works on 4.8, doesn't work on 5.0: the client is denied access, allegedly due to OpenBSD shipping the wrong (X.509) certificate, or certificates in the wrong order. The (3rd party) claim is that it might ship the CA

Re: query bug reports?

2011-10-14 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 09:40:42AM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: My vote would go for Redmine (use together with thin), which has a if the project wants to use/try it, I can offer my help with this one. Please contact me off-list. Kind regards, --Toni++

query bug reports?

2011-10-13 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, today I wanted to research open bug reports for OpenBSD, using this link in lieu of anything linked from the homepage: http://www.openbsd.org/query-pr.html But when I submit the form, I only get an error message that the CGI was not found. Where should I be looking instead, please? Kind

4.9/amd64: kernel crash with temperhum

2011-10-13 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, today I experienced a kernel crash on a machine with the temperhum device. The crash message indicates that the driver uthum was responsible, but since the machine is physically inaccessible to me, I only have a screenshot. Is it still worth reporting, scribbling from a handset screenshot,

Re: query bug reports?

2011-10-13 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi Daniel, On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 09:10:22AM +0200, LEVAI Daniel wrote: On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 09:01:51 +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: today I wanted to research open bug reports for OpenBSD, using this link in lieu of anything linked from the homepage: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm

ipsec: failure after upgrade

2011-09-28 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, I have lan1 -- gw1 --- internet --- gw2 -- lan2 The setup has been working for years. Now I upgraded one side to 4.9, while the other - so far - is still at 4.6 (I know... :( ). After that, no connection gets established anymore: 1.2.3.4: OpenBSD 4.6 4.3.2.1: OpenBSD 4.9

Re: ipsec: failure after upgrade [SOLVED]

2011-09-28 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, I solved the site-site part of it. It turned out to be a typo somewhere. :( But the mobile issue is still open. Kind regards, --Toni++

Re: Custom bsd.rd contents

2011-03-09 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Sun, 27.02.2011 at 18:52:28 -0500, Adam Van Ymeren adam.v...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying to modify the contents of the ram disk in a bsd.rd kernel. Is there any documentation on this process? Or can anyone point in my a good direction to start looking? you might find this example

CARP and routing

2010-11-25 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, I discover that CARP and routing don't always mix well: Internet --- host1 host2 If host1 and host2 have a CARP interface with the same IP, then packets destined for that IP don't ever reach host2, even if the interface on host1 is in BACKUP state. Kind regards, --Toni++

Re: CARP and routing

2010-11-25 Thread Toni Mueller
On Thu, 25.11.2010 at 13:15:06 +, Michal mic...@sharescope.co.uk wrote: On 25/11/10 12:22, Toni Mueller wrote: I discover that CARP and routing don't always mix well: Internet --- host1 host2 Wait, do you mean; Host1 Internet

Re: CARP and routing

2010-11-25 Thread Toni Mueller
On Thu, 25.11.2010 at 14:29:39 +, Michal mic...@sharescope.co.uk wrote: Because your setup should rather look like this? Internet --- switch --- host1 --- switch --- LAN + --- host2 + This is what I was trying to get at...the way you draw your diagram, I can't

Re: Unattended OpenBSD Installation

2010-11-24 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi Nick, On Sun, 14.11.2010 at 11:31:52 -0700, Nick Bender nben...@gmail.com wrote: I am currently working on the next version which is much better - it meets all your requirements. I'm calling it redux and I'm including the readme below. this is great news! Any chance to get this into the

[OT] Re: relayd port to linux

2010-11-24 Thread Toni Mueller
On Fri, 05.11.2010 at 16:54:00 +0100, Aleksandar Lazic al-open...@none.at wrote: due to the fact that openssh and some other parts of openbsd are ported to linux maybe you can tell me if you plan to make a openrelayd which is able to compile on linux. I'am willing to try it by my self,

Re: Linux or OpenBSD

2010-11-24 Thread Toni Mueller
On Wed, 24.11.2010 at 21:30:05 +0100, ropers rop...@gmail.com wrote: On 23 November 2010 13:52, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote: I usually have a use case that can be satisfied with one XOR the other system So, not with both? You have weird use cases. I don't think so. See eg

Re: Linux or OpenBSD

2010-11-23 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Sun, 24.10.2010 at 08:20:35 +0530, Siju George sgeorge...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote: Also, Linux is better supported by hardware vendors, and/or much less picky about hardware than OpenBSD is. Not always

Re: Linux or OpenBSD

2010-11-23 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Sat, 23.10.2010 at 10:36:54 -0500, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote: On Oct 23, 2010, at 8:48, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote: Also, Linux is better supported by hardware vendors, and/or much less picky about hardware than OpenBSD is. If you consider the garbage

Re: em(4) detailed errors

2010-11-23 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Thu, 18.11.2010 at 16:38:55 +0100, Manuel Guesdon ml+openbsd.m...@oxymium.net wrote: Is there a way to get detailed em(4) device errors without having to recompile kernel with EM_DEBUG ? I try to find in-errors reason(s) but netstat only gives errors as a sum of dropped_pkts +

Re: em(4) detailed errors

2010-11-23 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Tue, 23.11.2010 at 11:07:40 -0500, Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote: On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 03:16:57PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: # ifconfig em3 em3: flags=8b43UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,ALLMULTI

Re: Linux or OpenBSD

2010-11-23 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Tue, 23.11.2010 at 17:45:16 +0100, Alexander Schrijver alexander.schrij...@gmail.com wrote: Why don't you run linux on them? You aren't being very environmentally aware are you? I don't understand what you mean with this remark. The application that I use these machines for requires

Re: Linux or OpenBSD

2010-11-23 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Tue, 23.11.2010 at 10:55:30 -0500, and...@msu.edu and...@msu.edu wrote: Toni, have you published a list of the hardware thats been causing you problems? sorry, no I didn't think of it, yet. But I have posted to this list about some of them, most prominently the small PCs with C7 chips.

Re: Linux or OpenBSD

2010-11-23 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Tue, 23.11.2010 at 14:09:48 -0500, daniel holtzman d...@redmountainfarm.net wrote: Perhaps one or more developers would be curious about the crashes? Why not donate the machines instead of throw them out? ok. I'm not the owner, only the janitor, for these machines. Unless I figure out

Re: Can't reach www.openbsd.org

2010-11-02 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Tue, 02.11.2010 at 13:40:44 +0100, Guillaume DualC) g.du...@otasc.org wrote: try it : http://openbsd.org it's (probably) not the same, and (worse!) it doesn't help with all the configurations that contain www.openbsd.org. Kind regards, --Toni++

Re: Linux or OpenBSD

2010-10-23 Thread Toni Mueller
On Wed, 22.09.2010 at 15:47:02 -0400, Brad Tilley b...@16systems.com wrote: Either will work fine so long as you purchase good NICs and avoid cutting-edge (untested) hardware. The only things Linux does noticeably better is: * Dealing with SMP * Dealing with lot's and

Re: which monitoring do you use (on OpenBSD)

2010-10-14 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Sat, 14.08.2010 at 23:49:49 -0700, Bryan Irvine sparcta...@gmail.com wrote: understand. Also, the OP wanted something that he can run on OpenBSD and Zenoss runs on Linux. hmmm from my perspective, Zenoss looks like an ordinary Zope application, and should therefore run on OpenBSD as

Re: iked(8) and ikectl(8)

2010-10-14 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Thu, 03.06.2010 at 23:06:58 +0200, Reyk Floeter r...@openbsd.org wrote: IPsec. In difference to isakmpd(8), which supports the ISAKMP/Oakley a.k.a. IKEv1 protocol, iked(8) only supports the IKEv2 protocol at present. The IKEv2 protocol in RFC 4306 has been simplified and provides

Re: Activating ip6.forwarding and accept_rtadv at the same time

2010-09-06 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Mon, 06.09.2010 at 11:18:57 +1000, Olivier Mehani sht...@ssji.net wrote: On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 03:49:43PM -0400, Simon Comeau Martel wrote: You received a /64 for your router interface ? Or are you in a /64 subnet with other customers ? The setup sounds weird to me. To what

Re: OBSD 4.7 and Via C7 motherboards problem

2010-08-16 Thread Toni Mueller
or might not be there. But it's worth a try. My supplier is already looking into this issue of possible BIOS uppgrades. On 2010-08-13, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote: Having said that, what is the current common wisdom for reliable small CPE boxes that are reliable enough to be safely

Re: which monitoring do you use (on OpenBSD)

2010-08-14 Thread Toni Mueller
On Fri, 13.08.2010 at 14:36:21 +0100, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: What do people think of monit. Ok, I'll chime in: What do people think of Zenoss and splunk? I'm so far leaning twoards trying Zenoss, but it surely has a high barrier-of-entry, and I'm only interested in splunk

Re: OBSD 4.7 and Via C7 motherboards problem

2010-08-13 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi Stuart, thanks for the idea. On Thu, 12.08.2010 at 12:09:02 +, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote: Guessing based on very little information, but they probably have different BIOSes. Unfortunately, as I just hear, the manufacturer dropped support for these machines. My

Re: OBSD 4.7 and Via C7 motherboards problem

2010-08-12 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Sun, 01.08.2010 at 13:49:07 -0700, Peter Merritt pwmerr...@weirdwater.org wrote: I have a firewall that has been running several versions of OpenBSD successfully, the last being 4.6. After installing 4.7, I could not get the firewall to pass any traffic from the lan side. I'm

4.7: my error, or system error?

2010-07-20 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, I've recompiled my system(s) several times in order to follow -stable, but (now?) see this problem: # savecore -v /var/crash/ dumpoff = 4838922240 (9451020 * 512) savecore: /bsd: kvm_dump_mkheader: invalid magic in cpu_hdr savecore: no core dump

Re: OpenBSD 4.7 as VPN Gateway for Road Warriors, Preferred Configuration

2010-05-31 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Sun, 23.05.2010 at 11:41:27 +0200, Martin PelikC!n martin.peli...@gmail.com wrote: It really depends on what you need - most road warriors are okay with transport mode (where obviously DHCP doesn't make any sense). If I'd say that transport mode is a design error in IPSEC and should be

4.7/pf: table changes ignored until reloading the rule set?

2010-05-31 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, I have a problem with tables in pf in that I can add addresses and/or network blocks to tables and don't get them recognized until I reload the filter rules. Example: # pfctl -T a -t extra-oekonet-dst 172.16.19.0/24 1/1 addresses added. # pfctl -T s -t extra-oekonet-dst

Re: nested vlans: safe to use?

2010-05-12 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Wed, 12.05.2010 at 01:09:55 +, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote: First talk to your wan provider, they might either be able to allocate you a couple of vlans that they'll carry for you, or do QinQ (i.e. you feed the provider plain vlans, and they appear directly at the

Re: nested vlans: safe to use?

2010-05-12 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Wed, 12.05.2010 at 14:23:18 +0200, Pete Vickers p...@systemnet.no wrote: http://www.openbsd.org/papers/asiabsdcon2010_vether/index.html especially page 6/7... thanks, but... I may have mis-stated the problem. I have no bandwidth or fragmentation problem, but rather a configuration

Re: nested vlans: safe to use?

2010-05-12 Thread Toni Mueller
On Wed, 12.05.2010 at 19:48:47 +0100, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote: But usually you just feed plain vlans to the wan provider and they handle translation or stacking.. ?!? If they're doing nested vlans (tag stacking), usually you feed them frames, they add their own

nested vlans: safe to use?

2010-05-11 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, I've been trying to figure out whether I can use OpenBSD in a nested vlan scenario. I'm looking at a data centre where I want to get two wires, each carrying several vlans, and funneling them home across a WAN link. Various switch vendors claim to be able to do it, but I couldn't really

Re: OT - UML, can someone state that it works ?

2010-05-05 Thread Toni Mueller
On Wed, 05.05.2010 at 14:31:32 -0500, Walter Goulet wgou...@gmail.com wrote: I think the UML the OP is referring to is Unified Modeling Language and Rational Unified Process. I think this solves it: On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Lars Nooden lars.cura...@gmail.com wrote: :P ;) Kind

Re: OT - UML, can someone state that it works ?

2010-05-05 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, I'm not an OpenBSD developer, but would like to chime in anyway: On Wed, 05.05.2010 at 16:08:47 -0300, Christiano F. Haesbaert haesba...@haesbaert.org wrote: I'm really sick of hearing about UML/RUP and all this boulshit about software engineering in my university. Many of those things

Re: addendum: 4.7 causes different problem Re: spurious need to frag messages

2010-05-03 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Wed, 17.03.2010 at 17:48:21 +0100, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote: On Mon, 15.03.2010 at 19:10:12 +0100, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote: # pfctl -s a |grep mss # ifconfig|grep mtu|grep -v 1500 lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 33152 enc0

-current i386 (#501): massive performance drop from #448

2010-04-11 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, going from #448 (March 16th) to #501 (April 8th), I noticed a sharp drop in performance. The problem manifests itself in the machine frequently becoming very sluggish wrt. network performance. In numbers, this means that the packet loss rate jumps to more than a felt 90% for more than a

Re: Howto Create a Auto-Extract Package with Shell Script tar ?

2010-04-10 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello, On Sat, 10.04.2010 at 09:17:53 +0800, Aaron Lewis aaron.lewis1...@gmail.com wrote: Firstly i need to compress my fonts to a Font_Name.tar.bz2 , if i want to put the extract script and Font_Name.tar.bz2 together , a single bundle , howto archive it ? Right now , i tried

Re: -current (#448): starts dropping packets after a while

2010-04-08 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, this should have gone into the thread 'spurious need to frag messages'. Sorry for opening a new thread. On Wed, 31.03.2010 at 13:36:48 +0200, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote: recently, a problem with OpenBSD has popped up over here that manifests itself in random connection

-current amd64 (#178): NO PROPOSAL CHOSEN

2010-04-08 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, while playing around with the latest code as of today, off of CVS's HEAD, I find that it sometimes takes considerable time to establish a connection to a static peer, and while negotiating, the two isakmpds sometimes send NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN to each other. After a while, it suddenly works.

feature request: fallback boot image

2010-04-02 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, it would be great to be able to specify a fallback kernel in case booting a new kernel fails - esp. if one needs to work on a remote site w/o hands-on support. TIA! Kind regards, --Toni++

Re: feature request: fallback boot image

2010-04-02 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Fri, 02.04.2010 at 06:50:00 -0500, Chris Bennett ch...@bennettconstruction.biz wrote: If you are talking about an upgrade then cp bsd bsd.backup before install should do it. Then use boot boot /bsd.backup after a failed upgrade. I thought about the case where the new kernel won't boot

Re: feature request: fallback boot image

2010-04-02 Thread Toni Mueller
On Fri, 02.04.2010 at 08:44:56 -0500, Chris Bennett ch...@bennettconstruction.biz wrote: If you don't have access to a console remotely, then exactly how would you type fallback /bsd.backup? I would like to see a configuration option in /etc/boot.conf that I could use to specify a fallback

Re: feature request: fallback boot image

2010-04-02 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Fri, 02.04.2010 at 15:50:36 +0200, Paul de Weerd we...@weirdnet.nl wrote: What do you mean the new kernel won't boot ? I mean that, for whatever reason, the kernel does not reach full multi-user capabilities within some timeout (say, 5 minutes). there, the bootloader will automagically

Re: feature request: fallback boot image

2010-04-02 Thread Toni Mueller
On Fri, 02.04.2010 at 22:20:46 +0200, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote: * Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net [2010-04-02 12:25]: it would be great to be able to specify a fallback kernel in case booting a new kernel fails how exactly does the bootloader notice your new kernel

Re: question wrt. -current

2010-04-01 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Wed, 31.03.2010 at 17:12:30 -0700, Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com wrote: The i386 build has been around a lot longer than amd64, so comparing absolutes doesn't reveal the relative rate. that doesn't sound compelling to me, as, afair, the serial numbers are reset on every release.

Re: httpd segmentation fault

2010-04-01 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Wed, 31.03.2010 at 22:10:08 +0300, Ozgur Kazancci ozgur.kazan...@info.uvt.ro wrote: - Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote: On Wed, 31.03.2010 at 14:03:06 -0400, Devin Ceartas nacred...@gmail.com wrote: I suppose it should be 5.2.11 or later my machine running 4.6

-current (GENERIC.MP#148 amd64): cannot load anchor from file

2010-04-01 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, I'm trying to run my pf setup on the latest -current/amd64 like this: # pfctl -n -f pf.conf (gives no error or warning) # pfctl -f pf.conf pfctl: pfctl_rules pfctl: load anchors pfctl: DIOCXROLLBACK: Invalid argument The only anchor statments I have are these: # grep anchor pf.conf anchor

feature request: ifconfig emX clear

2010-04-01 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, I'd like to be able to clear the counters of interfaces, similar to clear counters in Cisco lingo. TIA! Kind regards, --Toni++

Re: -current (GENERIC.MP#148 amd64): cannot load anchor from file

2010-04-01 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, thanks for answering! On Thu, 01.04.2010 at 10:28:16 -0700, Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com wrote: This is generally caused by mismatched kernel and userland. How confident are you that yours were built from the same/matching sources? I installed these files from my installation

-current (#448): starts dropping packets after a while

2010-03-31 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, recently, a problem with OpenBSD has popped up over here that manifests itself in random connection failures after some time. Network diagram: workstation (1) --- (3b) firewall (3a) --- Internet --- www.example.com (2) You surf from your workstation to www.example.com. On the firewall, you

question wrt. -current

2010-03-31 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, comparing the build dates and serial numbers of kernels, I get the impression that amd64 kernels are only built once in a while, so to say, compared to i386 kernels, because the #148 kernel for amd64 is much more recent than the #448 one for i386. Right? Wrong? Does it matter, and if so,

Re: httpd segmentation fault

2010-03-31 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Wed, 31.03.2010 at 14:03:06 -0400, Devin Ceartas nacred...@gmail.com wrote: I suppose it should be 5.2.11 or later my machine running 4.6 stable has 5.2.12 installed from ports looking into CVS, it turns out that 5.2.10 is in 4.6-release, while 5.2.12 is in 4.6-stable. -- Kind

Re: 4.7: doesn't route IPSEC traffic very well

2010-03-25 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Wed, 17.03.2010 at 16:26:39 -0500, Todd T. Fries t...@fries.net wrote: Try s/hmac-sha2-256/hmac-sha1/ until you have updated all your firewalls. Also try seeing http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20100110 .. thanks to all who helped out to solve this particular case of PEBCAK.

addendum: 4.7 causes different problem Re: spurious need to frag messages

2010-03-17 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Mon, 15.03.2010 at 19:10:12 +0100, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote: # pfctl -s a |grep mss # ifconfig|grep mtu|grep -v 1500 lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 33152 enc0: flags=41UP,RUNNING mtu 1536 pflog0: flags=141UP,RUNNING,PROMISC mtu 33152 # And that's

4.7: doesn't route IPSEC traffic very well

2010-03-17 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, I've installed the latest snapshot, with kernel bsd.mp#488, on a machine that has several IPSEC connections to handle, some fixed (branch offices), some for road warriors. The setup per se runs well for several years, but after this upgrade, traffic to the branch offices stopped. I checked

Re: pfctl(8): unclear docs

2010-03-17 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Wed, 17.03.2010 at 16:24:42 +0100, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote: -A, -O, -R are bullshit and I'll happily remove them. soon. that's ok with me. I thought that changing the docs was the less-intrusive thing to do, and I have no experience with ipf, so that certainly wasn't

Re: 4.7: doesn't route IPSEC traffic very well

2010-03-17 Thread Toni Mueller
Darn, I should write better messages. So here goes an important addendum: On Wed, 17.03.2010 at 17:55:34 +0100, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote: I've installed the latest snapshot, with kernel bsd.mp#488, on a machine that has several IPSEC connections to handle, some fixed (branch

Re: pfctl(8): unclear docs

2010-03-16 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Tue, 16.03.2010 at 07:37:42 +0001, Jason McIntyre j...@kerhand.co.uk wrote: On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:35:23PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: An optimizer (or any other such device) which is on by default and claims to not change semantics, should imho be transparent to the user

pfctl(8): unclear docs

2010-03-15 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, I've just run into the following problem on a 4.6 box: /etc/pf.conf (excerpt): table rfc1918 const { 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16 } block out on $extif from rfc1918 # /sbin/pfctl -F rules -R -f pf.conf rules cleared pfctl: Must enable

Re: pfctl(8): unclear docs

2010-03-15 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Mon, 15.03.2010 at 12:22:35 +0100, matteo filippetto matteo.filippe...@gmail.com wrote: for me it works good ... just don't use -R option http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/openbsd-misc/2007/4/6/147502 thanks for this link. Not using -R is not too good, either, as on this particular

spurious need to frag messages

2010-03-15 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, one of my OpenBSD 4.6 boxen starts sending out need to fragment messages to other hosts, w/o me seeing the reason. # pfctl -s a |grep mss # ifconfig|grep mtu|grep -v 1500 lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 33152 enc0: flags=41UP,RUNNING mtu 1536 pflog0:

Re: pfctl(8): unclear docs

2010-03-15 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Mon, 15.03.2010 at 13:04:04 +, Jason McIntyre j...@kerhand.co.uk wrote: doesn;t Other rules and options are ignored. already cover this? may be. But then, you are possibly only too deeply entrenched in this stuff to see the problem. furthermore, since -T has a load command, should

ipsecctl(8): delete by SPI index?

2010-03-13 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, I dimly remember that it was possible to delete flows by specifying their SPI index in the SADB, but when I say # ipsecctl -d 0x12345678 with 0x12345678 being a number obtained by running # ipsecctl -v -ss I only get back an error message. If I say ipsecctl -sf and feed one of these lines

Re: Easy money with OpenBSD OpenBGPd?

2010-03-13 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, technical issues aside, On Sat, 13.03.2010 at 15:24:30 +, Sevan / Venture37 ventur...@gmail.com wrote: I was reading the arstechnica article on the internet filtering that's now in place in New Zealand they mentioned that the appliance they're using called a Whitebox which uses a

Re: sysctl(3)

2010-03-12 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Fri, 12.03.2010 at 13:21:45 +0001, Jason McIntyre j...@kerhand.co.uk wrote: On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:23:22AM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: what exactly is missing from sysctl(3)? the sections I read seem to exhaustively list the settings that can be used with the 'mib' parameter

Re: sysctl(3)

2010-03-11 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi Otto, On Thu, 11.03.2010 at 07:08:24 +0100, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote: On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:23:22AM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: Btw, in the snapshot of today, the sysctl(3) man page is absent: $ find . -name 'sysctl*' ./cat8/sysctl.0 ./cat5/sysctl.conf.0 $ Did

Re: sysctl(3)

2010-03-11 Thread Toni Mueller
On Thu, 11.03.2010 at 14:31:46 +0100, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote: But I'll now grab 'comp' too and see if that helps. I've now looked at the man page in -current, and it does not cover the leaves below PF_KEY. -- Kind regards, --Toni++

sysctl(3)

2010-03-10 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, while digging into my problem with bogus SADB entries, I noticed that sysctl(3) is incomplete, and the online man page doesn't show up (I only get sysctl(8) to see when accessing this link:

Re: sysctl(3)

2010-03-10 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Wed, 10.03.2010 at 21:48:38 +0001, Jason McIntyre j...@kerhand.co.uk wrote: what exactly is missing from sysctl(3)? the sections I read seem to exhaustively list the settings that can be used with the 'mib' parameter, but not for PF_KEY. Btw, in the snapshot of today, the sysctl(3) man

IPSEC: trying to understand ipsec.conf(5)

2010-01-24 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, I'm running an IPSEC setup using iskampd.conf + isakmpd.policy, and would like to move to using ipsec.conf instead. First off, I noticed that, if isakmpd is running w/o the '-K' switch, running 'ipsecctl -f somefile' results in a problem accessing /var/run/isakmpd.fifo, with a file does not

Re: IPSEC: trying to understand ipsec.conf(5)

2010-01-24 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Sun, 24.01.2010 at 17:47:22 +0100, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote: First off, I noticed that, if isakmpd is running w/o the '-K' switch, running 'ipsecctl -f somefile' results in a problem accessing /var/run/isakmpd.fifo, with a file does not exist error. scratch

Re: IPSEC: bad checksum

2010-01-22 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Thu, 21.01.2010 at 21:48:01 +, Christian Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de wrote: Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote: today I see tons of these on a 4.6-stable/amd64 machine (sample): 17:21:00.848135 esp 1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2 spi 0x54d46678 seq 132642 len 84 (DF) (ttl 64, id 49897

IPSEC: bad checksum

2010-01-21 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, today I see tons of these on a 4.6-stable/amd64 machine (sample): 17:21:00.848135 esp 1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2 spi 0x54d46678 seq 132642 len 84 (DF) (ttl 64, id 49897, len 104, bad cksum 0! differs by 8b3c) 17:21:00.859630 esp 2.2.2.2 1.1.1.1 spi 0x87b9932c seq 89638 len 324 (ttl 46, id 63366,

SOLVED: Re: Feature request: pf + set-tos, Re: IPSEC ECN: no-go?

2010-01-20 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Sat, 09.01.2010 at 13:09:29 -0500, Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote: # /sbin/pfctl -n -f pf.conf.test pf.conf.test:23: illegal tos value (null) Best guess: sbin/pfctl/parse.y thanks, Ted, this worked

Re: Recommend T1 Card for 4.6

2010-01-09 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Wed, 06.01.2010 at 22:19:55 +0100, David Coppa dco...@gmail.com wrote: man 4 art these cards are almost great, but I don't know where to purchase any. Otherwise, I'd get two or three more myself. My only current problem with these cards is that they don't support in-depth line

Re: ldconfig: default path?

2010-01-09 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Wed, 30.12.2009 at 18:17:24 +0100, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote: I don't know about a long list of directories. These days, there are at most 5 ports that do this kind of annoying shit. Toni, this looks like hyperbolic speech to me. 4 or 5 doesn't amount to long list. I'll

Re: IPSEC bringing down networking 1.1

2010-01-09 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Tue, 05.01.2010 at 12:44:49 -0800, Jeff Simmons jsimm...@goblin.punk.net wrote: fw:$ netstat -nr tip: netstat -rnf encap results elided Encap: Source Port Destination Port Proto SA(Address/Proto/Type/Direction) expected ecap routes elided 0/00 0/0

Re: Feature request: pf + set-tos, Re: IPSEC ECN: no-go?

2010-01-09 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, [ will cross-post this to tech@ ] On Mon, 05.10.2009 at 18:47:10 +0200, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote: On Thu, 01.10.2009 at 12:21:19 +0200, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote: Searching around, I found that this question was already raised by Martin Hedenfalk well

Re: Recommend T1 Card for 4.6

2010-01-09 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Wed, 06.01.2010 at 14:45:42 -0800, Noah Pugsley noa...@bendtel.com wrote: A little off topic but why trying to get rid of the Cisco? Other than the power/size/noise or to simplify your setup, less links in the chain, etc.. I use OpenBSD for everything I can, and some things I

Re: ldconfig: default path?

2009-12-30 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi Dale, hi Theo, On Tue, 29.12.2009 at 11:55:55 -0600, Dale Rahn dr...@dalerahn.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 06:03:48PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: I've just seen a program fail to work, saying that it can't load a shared library (but a different one on each invocation - this is an SMP

ldconfig: default path?

2009-12-29 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, I've just seen a program fail to work, saying that it can't load a shared library (but a different one on each invocation - this is an SMP machine). Then I found out that /usr/local/lib was not part of the scanned directories. Looking into

Re: shutdown and reboot sometimes ignored?

2009-11-23 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Sun, 22.11.2009 at 23:03:10 +0100, Joachim Schipper joac...@joachimschipper.nl wrote: On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 10:00:05PM +0100, Peter J. Philipp wrote: On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 09:20:46PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: for several releases of OpenBSD, I now have encountered the problem

Re: shutdown and reboot sometimes ignored?

2009-11-23 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Mon, 23.11.2009 at 10:04:20 -0600, Chris Bennett ch...@bennettconstruction.biz wrote: If you are running PostgreSQL, and aren't running as root, you will need to use sudo shutdown -r now or /etc/rc.shutdown will hang ?? you mean, if I am not running PostgreSQL as root? I usually

shutdown and reboot sometimes ignored?

2009-11-22 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, for several releases of OpenBSD, I now have encountered the problem that I can say shutdown -r now, or halt, or reboot, and nothing appears to happen, except for some messages on the associated terminals. Sometimes, it works after saying it multiple times, and literally after minutes, and on

art(4): seeking new and used cards

2009-11-16 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, if someone has to sell known-good Accom cards, I'm very much interested in purchasing some. Please contact me off-list. TIA! -- Kind regards, --Toni++

make release w/o make build?

2009-11-10 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, I'm wondering about the options when I want to make a release, and would like some insight into the build process. Background: During a release's lifetime, I want to create a set of new installation tarballs for -stable, to be able to (re-) install machines with all relevant patches already

  1   2   3   4   5   >