t;relay_incoming" relay host smtp://127.0.0.1:10025
>
> match for local action "lmtp-local"
> match tag DKIM_CHECKED from any for domain action "lmtp-local"
> match tag DKIM for any action "relay"
> match from any for domain action &qu
sion established a connection then attempted TLS
negotiation. this worked fine, the MTA session played out until it hit a
TLS error that caused it to drop connection. TLS was opportunistic so it
connected again but without TLS.
The only "issue" in this log is that th
dy@public.domain -> andy@imap3.private
>
this will appear in Received lines though
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
Doable with OpenSMTPD using multiple actions and using the rcpt-to matching
criteria, however it feels kind of hackish to do it at that level.
Basically you would create one action per dovecot shard, then one match per
shard with an rcpt-to criteria pointing to a table containing the recipients
charge of handling delivery for all virtual users.
This option is not usable with the mbox delivery method.
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
--
You recei
uoting the man page:
[!] from src address |
Specify that session may only originate from string or
list table address which can be a specific address or a
subnet expressed in CIDR-notation.
you're using an older versi
nSMTPD builtin.
it was fixed three days ago in -current.
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
T
he only point of information ;-)
I want to make it clear though that OpenSMTPD will not cover for filters
misbehaving, in most cases it will abort because filters are not allowed
to violate the protocol, plain and simple.
Most of the missing work is to actually ensure that filters can&
imeout, filters timeout, ...
- all kinds of DATA issues: filter responding with end of message, while
client hasn't responded with end of message yet, ...
- all kinds of exhaustions: failure to allocate filter sessions, failure
to send data to filters because the pipe is exhausted, ...
-
ot;
> as a character - would the separator processing still work?
>
yes
the protocol header fields have a fixed size and do not contain '|',
only the last field may contain '|' so there's no ambiguity.
> I am not sure all my queries above are relevant or correc
omain regex [...]
etc...
You can read more about it from my blog where I wrote an article talking
about filters two days ago and a smaller article today about regex.
Code has been synchronized in github already.
--
Gilles Chehade
initated the connection:
$ spamdb | grep -E '^(GREY|WHITE)\|' | cut -d\| -f1,2
Do not spam misc@ with that output, send it directly to me.
Thanks !
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https:/
his flow on my understanding of the "reject_unknown_client_hostname"
> feature of Postfix [1].
>
Yes, they are alike.
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
--
You recei
OpenSMTPD release, the development FAQ
is evaluated to make sure it is accurate
4- in between, keep improving the FAQ with relevant information and make
sure that issues reported by the community are fixed
That's about all, it's not tricky but it requires commitment.
It could be a j
you're running stable you will always be up to date with patches.
> > On 20 Dec 2018, at 6:38 pm, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 02:52:19PM +1100, Antonino Sidoti wrote:
> >> HI,
> >>
> >> I am on OpenBSD 6.4 and
t; On 17 Dec 2018, at 3:15 am, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 11:11:23AM -0500, Matt Schwartz wrote:
> >> Hi Gilles,
> >>
> >> Stupid question but did these minor fixes come via a syspatch or do I need
> >> to download and
ask me to troubleshoot their setup and it
distracts me from code.
if someone steps up to do the work, I will happily welcome the FAQ again
but it needs to be someone who commits to that work, not someone that'll
write the pages dump them once and disappear.
--
Gilles Chehade
Dec 16, 2018, 11:05 AM Gilles Chehade
> > Subject: Announce: OpenSMTPD 6.4.1 released
> >
> > OpenSMTPD 6.4.1 has just been released.
> >
> > OpenSMTPD is a FREE implementation of the SMTP protocol with some common
> > extensions. It allows ordinary machines to e
rectly to secur...@opensmtpd.org
Other bugs may be reported to b...@opensmtpd.org
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@o
ntainers and not release a version of it and leave.
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To un
a rework of the FAQ as far as I know.
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail t
then
forgotten, otherwise this means additional work for me.
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubsc
m infected home computers, which is most
of the non legitimate trafic coming to my box.
The code will be part of next release in April, until then you will have
to use code from OpenBSD -current or github's master or portable branch.
Thought I'd share this with you,
Che
that will actually have their filters
evolve as we make changes to the API.
I wrote a python binding in less than 100 lines of code and will provide
it for testing, maybe some of you want to write the same kind of binding
for other popular languages, let me know.
--
Gilles Chehade
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 04:10:15AM +, sunil+sm...@nimmagadda.net wrote:
> adding misc@opensmtpd.org...
>
diff ok with me !
> Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 04:05:49 +
> From: su...@nimmagadda.net
> To: Gilles Chehade
> Cc: Cristiano Costa , misc@opensmtpd.org
> Subject:
avelled to the party capital. So you wait/spool
> > in London until Edinburgh airport is receiving traffic. Then then you
> > get the next flight to your final destination & Hogmanay for 3 days.
>
> Thank you for the excellent analogy.
>
> I will now never forge
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 04:53:20AM +, sunil+sm...@nimmagadda.net wrote:
> Gilles Chehade wrote:
> [...]
> > > ascii_load_bounce_type(enum bounce_type *dest, char *buf)
> > > {
> > > if (strcasecmp(buf, "error") == 0)
> > > -
?
>
That's not possible.
If you have only 1 public IP address, how is the server supposed to know
which domain it should print on the banner when a client connects ?
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org t
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 01:10:13PM +, sunil+sm...@nimmagadda.net wrote:
> Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 03:22:14AM +, sunil+sm...@nimmagadda.net wrote:
> > > Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 06:11:29PM -0200, Cristian
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 03:22:14AM +, sunil+sm...@nimmagadda.net wrote:
> Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 06:11:29PM -0200, Cristiano Costa wrote:
> > > Hello everyone,
> > >
> > > Recently, we have updated our external MTA to u
; >Thus, 'Action: error' in this DSN is non-compliant. It should be
> > 'Action: failed'. You may wish to report this to the opensmtpd developers."
>
> So maybe you would like to patch opensmtpd too.
>
option:
> -negation TAG tables {
> +negation TAGGED tables {
> struct table *t = $3;
>
> if (rule->flag_tag) {
>
> --
> You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
> To unsubscr
On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 04:11:54PM +0100, Stefan Bagdohn wrote:
> Dear Gilles,
>
> You are a genius! I have no idea why this did not work out in the last weeks
> when I tried to get it up and running.
> Now I ended up with:
>
A genius, that's unlikely, but glad that i
..@example.com. So it was relayed afterwards by the first rule.
>
> Any hint how this could be done in the new grammar? I have no idea how to
> implement the old-style => catchall.
>
grammar set aside, it's done the exact same way.
--
Gilles Chehade
lle smtpd[1459]: lookup: check ?? example.org" as
> DOMAIN in table static: -> 0
> Dec 2 12:47:02 gabrielle smtpd[1459]: no rule matched
>
> As explained in my first email, this two examples leads to the error message
> result="550 Invalid recipient ??.
>
> I will t
e authenticated users which come
from your machine or from others:
match auth from local [...]
match auth from any [...]
Your new ruleset should have one or two additional match rules I guess.
Also, while at it, it is now also possible to match non-network sessions
wi
d.in/yGqkv7
>
> --
> You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
> To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
>
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org t
at direction but reloading not being very
important in my mind it might take time, if someone wanted to work on it
i'd help with getting started though ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/po
ept [...] deliver to mbox
action bleh mbox
match [...] action bleh
You write your rules the same way, they are evaluated in the same order,
there are a few minor keyword changes but quite frankly I don't see what
is so complex.
Anyways, the change was mandatory to move forward so th
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 09:11:22AM -0600, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
>
> On Nov 25, 2018 8:24 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >
> > There seems to be something wrong with your mail encoding, the diff is
> > barely readable for me, spaces are replaced with '?' :-/
&
nsion of an alias.
before 6.4, this resulted in "Recipient rejected" with no indication the
reason was in the expansion, so now the recipient is rejected but we let
the postmaster know this had to do with an expansion problem.
--
Gilles Chehade
.
>
> Not sure if there's a better way to accomplish this though.
>
that's the correct way of handling it in my opinion
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
--
Yo
s already quite long, it means that you have more
trust in the reliability of your secondary MX than your primary MX and
this essentially means your setup is wrong.
if you still want to do that, you should consider also looking at the
bounce warn-interval option so at the very least y
; +?? ?? "sendfd proc exec id inet unix", NULL) == -1)
> ?? err(1, "pledge");
>
> event_dispatch();
>
>
> --
> You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
> To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc
);
> ??} dispatcher_local_options
> -| MAILDIR STRING JUNK {
> +| MAILDIR STRING JUNK STRING{
> if (strncmp($2, "~/", 2) == 0)
> ?? asprintf(&dispatcher->u.local.command,
> -?? ?? ?? "/usr/libexec/mail.maildir -j
> \&quo
ou used something like:
$ openssl s_client -host 50.55.65.87 -port 587
instead of:
$ openssl s_client -host 50.55.65.87 -port 587 -starttls smtp
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/po
rs that are not production critical and which have
backup MX in case they're down, we encourage you to run master branch on
OpenBSD and portable branch on other systems, to run bleeding edge code.
This is what runs on the OpenSMTPD mailing list machine, so they are not
too unstable :-)
Cheers,
ping me
so we can talk.
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: mis
ar.gz
https://www.opensmtpd.org/archives/opensmtpd-extras-6.4.0.sum.sig
Cheers,
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
tarball and signature file:
https://www.opensmtpd.org/archives/opensmtpd-6.4.0p2.tar.gz
https://www.opensmtpd.org/archives/opensmtpd-6.4.0p2.sum.sig
The website will catch up on download links soon.
Enjoy !
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 06:35:45AM -0500, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 09:01:08 +0100, Gilles Chehade
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 04:01:12PM -0500, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > My conf is basically
> >
there a way to get back this behaviour I had before 6.4?
>
care to show your /etc/mail/aliases ?
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
Hi,I have started committing filters support to OpenBSD today in order to get them nice and ready for the next major release.The only part missing at this point is DATA filtering which I'll probably finish by the end of November.Filters are in development meaning that keywords will change, protocol
ackup one to realize the primary is up
which may take some time depending how long the primary was down.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a m
don't want to spread FUD but we're talking about a piece of code which
> > processes untrusted input with unreadable code and advises you to run it
> > setuid root because it doesn't know any better.
> >
> > There are safer, nicer and more modern alternatives s
such as fdm for one,
but quite frankly: even the shittiest 30 lines of sh self-written custom
mda makes a better choice than procmail.
Please do yourselves a favor, ditch procmail in favor of fdm.
If you want to argue why procmail is a nice choice be prepared for me to
start sharing samples
Sorry sent too fast, wanted to add that debugging configuration without logs is difficultLe 27 oct. 2018 06:48, Gilles Chehade a écrit :This can mean you have a loop of some sort in aliases expansion, or maybe in .forward b«yÇ¢½çm+&j)[yÆ®±ì¨¹ªÞ²æìr¸yÛh+ ¢§²kivàN§²æìr¸zǧu©[h+
Actually it makes sense having both from local and auth rules
This can mean you have a loop of some sort in aliases expansion, or maybe in .forward
eparately over the next
few weeks so they can be tested in development.
I'll explain the plan for filters in an upcoming mail but now is time to
drink and celebrate the end of the week :-)
Gilles
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @p
icial" IRC channel for the project is at:
#OpenSMTPD @ irc.freenode.net
Reporting Bugs:
===
Please read http://www.opensmtpd.org/report.html
Security bugs should be reported directly to secur...@opensmtpd.org
Other bugs may be reported to b...@opensmtpd.org
--
Gilles
We're not ready for the portable release yet so I didn't build the master release, it is however tagged on GitHub already so you can download a tarball for tag opensmtpd-6.4.0 thereGillesLe 22 oct. 2018 14:18, Matt Schwartz a écrit :I think it's best if you get the sources from OpenBSD CVS.On Mon,
helo,
made a change to the mailing list paths on the mail server, just testing
that i didn't break something ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.o
Peter
> >
> > --
> > Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
> > http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
> > "Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
> > delilah spamd
, a lot of people are using the smtpctl stats command as an
input to reporting utilities and maybe we should provide a better way to
do that, and maybe I already have diffs heading in that direction ;)
Gilles
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poo
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 06:33:33PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> $2b$09$fEv/zNZ/5hELpDH3Vq93AuygRLnySIcNXH78rq9WxPPbZJxmcdk5m
> | | ||
> | | ||__ encrypted password
> | | |__ begining of salt
> |
bout is if password
was generated using the same crypt() function that will be used validate
it.
I suggest your read the crypt(3) and passwd(1) man pages of your system.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because
fair enough
On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 07:44:12AM -0400, Matt Schwartz wrote:
> Yes, I'm interested in getting those going so I can update the
> table_sqlite(5) page for you. :-) Basic files do work well enough though.
>
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018, 4:29 AM Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 10:26:15PM -0400, Matt Schwartz wrote:
> Does anyone know how the following tables work?
> query_netaddr
> query_userinfo
> query_source
> query_mailaddr
> query_addrname
>
> I am trying to convert my setup entirely to sqlite.
>
any parti
nsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
> >
>
> My bad just realized you were specifically asking about the ones not
> mentioned in the manual. I haven't used them, but I imagine it would be
> similar to how those tables work as described in table(5) just via SQL
> statements.
indeed
--
lles' into uid 1000 and homedir /home/gilles
4- THEN femail/fdm/procmail/whatever runs as uid 1000
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
take your example:
> # vmail user is 2000
> user1 2000:2000:/var/vmail/user1
>
> # virtuals
> us...@domain1.com vmail
you have resolved us...@domain1.com into the user 'vmail'.
then we lookup the user 'vmail' in the userbase and ... nope, not fou
"domain"
> > >
> > > # Outgoing
> > > #
> > > match tag DKIM for any action "relay"
> > > match from local for any action "dkim"
> > > match auth from any for any action "dkim"
> > >
local for any action "dkim"
> match auth from any for any action "dkim"
>
> #usrbase
> m...@example.org 2000:2000:/var/vmail/example.org/matt
>
userbase maps a user to an account, so you shouldn't use an email address
here, it should be 'vmail
On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 07:51:11PM -0500, Edgar Pettijohn III wrote:
> Probably already known issue, but just in case. I just got a message from
> firefox that opensmtpd.org has an expired certificate.
>
> Thanks,
>
renewed, sorry
--
Gilles Chehade
https:
you will still have your previous table used until you fix
b- if it is valid but not what smtpd expects at runtime it will just
fail lookups.
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 10:51 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 10:07:32AM +0200, Teno Deuter wrote:
> >> wouldn'
Thank you
>
im not sure the test is relevant since you can update files at runtime.
maybe this check should only be done when a table is statically declared
in smtpd.conf
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 9:18 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 07:43:59PM +0200, Teno Deut
t;> Reio
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
> >>> To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
> >>>
> >
> >
> > --
> > You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
> > To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
> >
>
> --
> You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
> To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
>
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
key to that of _dkimproxy rather
than give that user more privileges ?
> Thank you for your help
>
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 11:27 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 10:29:51AM +0200, Teno Deuter wrote:
> >> indeed. What I'm doing is the following:
>
s wrong! Could it be the '_dkimproxy'
> user or the '_smtpd' one?
>
probably _dkimproxy, smtpd doesn't do signing
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 9:03 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 01:22:52AM +0200, Teno Deuter wrote:
> >>
y access to the directory too, i suspect that
whatever is trying to dkim sign does not have the rights to reach your key.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsu
root wheel default.private
>
This is not related to smtpd itself but one thing is for sure:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel default.private
^ this can't possibly be a good permission for a private key
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
st because the diff isn't wrong, it is just
not right either, it is a fix to an issue we should not be facing... and
I still have hope we can find a solution that doesn't involve it.
There's work by fellow OpenBSD hackers to improve the situation.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.pool
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:28:54PM +0200, Simon Lieb wrote:
> On 2018-05-25 14:24:08 +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Regarding this GDPR thing that everyone's crazy about these days...
> >
> > Just a reminder your opted-in to this list, if you d
We don't use your e-mail address for anything but to send you mails from
the misc@opensmtpd.org mailing list.
We don't track you, we don't even know how many people are subscribed to
the list and I might as well be alone here without even knowing :-/
Cheers,
--
Gilles Cheha
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 04:01:32PM +0300, Reio Remma wrote:
> On 24.05.18 15:55, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 03:53:14PM +0300, Reio Remma wrote:
> > > That's exactly the problem. Alias resolution wasn't possible before with
> > > relay a
nse, however a mechanism that's somehow similar and that makes sense
for relaying might be possible if we know what your use-case is.
> On 24.05.18 15:50, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > Anything the previous configuration allowed is still working.
> >
> >
> > On
able to reject mail to non-existent users outright before relaying to spam
> checking etc. with the new syntax.
>
> Thanks!
> Reio
>
> On 21.05.18 19:52, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > It's been a while since my last post but we've been
nBSD
hackers, but you can give it a try by cloning the 'dispatcher' branch
on github ... but only for OpenBSD users yet.
WE DO NEED TESTING FROM OPENBSD USERS PLIZE.
Feel free to ask questions here or on IRC.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org
on our side. :)
>
That's a work in progress.
I'll send a mail tomorrow to explain the changes that are pending ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 10:20:57PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 04:43:32PM +0200, Aham Brahmasmi wrote:
> > Hi Gilles,
> >
> the next issue being 6.4 in October / November, it depends on how much
> progress has been done with smtpfd by then.
>
8-04-30/opensmtpd-new-config/
> [2] - https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD/issues/773
> -|-|-|-|-|-|-|--
>
> --
> You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
> To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
>
--
hi,
the "new config" smtpd is being tested on the server running this
mailing list, please let me know if you observe something strange
gilles
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are sub
lt;http://www.postfix.org/socketmap_table.html>:unix://var/run/sockd.sock:test
> > The server prints: 10:test hello, /I suppose I could have been clearer.
> > The test with opensmtpd was via telnet session.
> A little more debugging. Running table-socketmap from the command line gives
> me this:
>
> table-socketmap[55941]: warn: table-api: imsg_read: Socket operation on
> non-socket
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
rical interface used to submit messages.
you can't just stuff the path to an SMTP server, the executable must ...
support the sendmail interface.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
2.7-config /usr/local/bin/python-config
> ln -sf /usr/local/bin/pydoc2.7 /usr/local/bin/pydoc
> # rcctl restart smtpd
> smtpd(ok)
> #
>
>
> On 01/23/18 01:31, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 01:21:22AM -0800, Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
> > >
jor...@mydomain.ca
> postmas...@mydomain.cajor...@mydomain.ca
> webmas...@mydomain.ca jor...@mydomain.ca
> jor...@mydomain.cavmail
>
>
> *Dovecot starts without complaint with this config:*
>
>
> passdb {
> ar
tpd.org
Other bugs may be reported to b...@opensmtpd.org
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
#x27;d like to avoid switching back and forth
between different code bases to fix build errors due to lack of test :-)
Please, download, build, do some basic testing and let me know how it is
for you so I can tag the minor release
--
Gilles Chehade
https:/
. Vector
>
And a special mention for Freddy who ported by himself to Solaris :-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
101 - 200 of 1023 matches
Mail list logo
