Hi,
I am stuck with many Cisco routers 7206 VXR that now run at 100% CPU
process time to time. The BGP table grow to a level that when combine
with a few access list on these routers, it now run out of steam! At a
minimum, more then I would like to see anyway!
I guess no one will be
Henning Brauer wrote:
I am more curious about the 2100 actually. Finally a vendor got it and
made a (apparently) decent single-CPU amd64 1U machine with a reasonable
price tag. I am uncertain what chipset they use, might be nForce, might
I like the 2100 better, but was looking at the 4100
I am not sure that this is normal for routers configure with MD5 or not
to react like this. Both side can and should be allow to initiate the
bgp session. But when the session is not initiate from bgpd, then
unexpected results occur.
OpenBSD --- Cisco routers.
With MD5.
If the session is
More on this with test results, example, setup use, and more details.
The short of it is that bgpd will not establish an MD5 connection as
slave ever! So, if you do get an MD5 session in normal operation, it may
well not stay stable at all depending of bgp flap and who will try to
become
Claudio Jeker wrote:
With bgpd master
Clear session from bgpd side, session comes back up right away.
Clear session from remote side, session comes back up with delay.
With bgpd slave
Clear session from bgpd side, session comes back up with delay.
Clear session from remote side, session comes
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 06:33:05PM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
==
Without MD5 configure.
With bgpd master
Clear session from bgpd side, session comes back up right away.
Clear session from remote side, session comes back up with delay.
With bgpd
pretty good. My only suggestions would be to note that Nick
handles the official FAQ, and adding Daniel Ouellet as the
organizer/caretaker of the unofficial user's library.
If you have any article(s) that you want to find a home for, I would be
more then happy to provide it! Contributions have been
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 06:33:05PM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Now with MD5 configure. We only add
tcp md5sig password test on bgpd side and
neighbor 66.63.12.108 password test on the Cisco side.
With bgpd master
Clear session from bgpd side, session
OpenBSD Admin wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with these sun boxes eg (the 'X' series
or aquarius are pretty new;
X2100
X4100
X4200
These three are new and not available now. Last time I check with Sun,
they will start to ship early November. So, I don't expect to many
feedback on
Marco Peereboom wrote:
Neat now OpenBSD and I share the same birthday :-)
Neat in fact! But we won't wish you happy 10th birthday right?
Or you sure would have started to bang on that keyboard very early for
sure! (; May be that's where some of the early bugs came from! (;
Unless you were
Hi all,
Here is my latest update on this one and a work around as well. Not
great, but it work for now until this bug is fix.
To reproduce the problem, you only need to enable:
ip tcp selective-ack
on your Cisco router and as soon as you will clean the BGP session setup
with MD5 on your
I actually was reading a good document on PF tonight and I came across
this quote that I think would answer your question as to the difference
between iptables and pf.
OK, may be it's more poetic, but still I really liked it.
Hope it make you think as well! (:
And I think it describe it very
Chad M Stewart wrote:
And if you'd pre-ordered 3.8 then you might have gotten an email like I
did today. :-) Now I just need enough revenue from my new company so I
can replace all of my servers with real boxes like V20z and X4100.
Funny now that I'm now longer an employee of Sun I'll
Please guys, can we stop this fight over who does what and how to be
accessible from where.
In the interest of bringing peace back on misc@ I will extend the offer
to host this on high capacity network if the community really want it.
More then once the community always say, yes this is
ok, i have sent them some nice feedback.
if some other people want to voice their dismay,
you can do it here: http://www.docs.hp.com/en/feedback.html
keep the flames in your fireplace at home,
probably just a massive typo...
Thanks Feedback sent in officially from my business with the list of
Some feedback already.
Keep sending the feedback.
They extracted only that part for my email to them however.
I wrote more then that and strongly suggested that a politically correct
moved would also be to give some hardware back to the project they
benefit as well!
At a minimum,
Kelly Martin wrote:
OpenBSD kernel panic'ed or was otherwise unresponsive. A full reboot
was required by pulling the plug, because the console would not
respond (I walked my brother through this over the phone - remote
location). When the system came back up, Apache would not start.
I know you
Larry Llong wrote:
I just want to allow port 22, 25 and 80 to my server.
I know I can activate and deactive pf with -e and -d, but that doesn't
seem to reload the configuration. Does it?
Read the informations available here:
http://openbsd.org/faq/pf/index.html
Or even a very good step by
Matthew S Elmore wrote:
I cannot appear to locate a telnet daemon in 3.8 installs now. It
appears to have silently disappeared between 3.7 and 3.8.
Not really silently, but not with huge party either.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-cvsm=111700017509177w=2
I know it was announce as
Will H. Backman wrote:
Anyone put OpenBSD 3.8 on a Sun Fire X2100 AMD server yet?
Not yet. My shipping date for the X2100 is:
**BACK ORDERED ETA OF 11/22/05**
For the X4100, well...
**BACK ORDERED CONSTRAINED** (NO ETA AS OF 11-07-05)
So, my guess is not before December will have be able
Larry Llong wrote:
this list is no where as bad as people say.
The list is very good and welcoming to users that do their homework and
try to find the answer first before asking. I think it's even one of the
best one, if not THE BEST one!
People that told you the list is bad are most
Marcos Laufer wrote:
Now what?
http://openbsdsupport.org/mysql.htm
Marcos Laufer wrote:
Ok , i had followed the instructions at http://openbsdsupport.org/mysql.htm
Go back and read again many times over until you get it.
You didn't read it and you didn't pay attention to statement in bold
either. I could tell you what to do to fix it, but then you wouldn't
Marcos Laufer wrote:
Ok , i had followed the instructions at http://openbsdsupport.org/mysql.htm
I also forgot to add this as well in my previous reply, also in the text
of the document you have been pointed to.
So, be wise and change what you need to change for your setup! But only
what
Marcos Laufer wrote:
When i post a message on the OpenBSD misc list it is because one
of two reasons:
Mostly one looks like.
1) I want to report an error i found while testing OpenBSD, and by
reporting it i might be helping the project, somebody might be able
to fix it and the OS grows.
2)
Toni Mueller wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Tue, 29.05.2007 at 14:13:06 +0100, mark reardon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just got a x2100 M2 from Sun yesterday on a 60 day trial and am having
trouble setting the MTU on one of the bge NICs. Just some initial findings.
Not a big problem for me really.
did
Dag Richards wrote:
I would recommend you take a look at the HP DL360,
one U
hardware raid
and have nice little management interface you can ssh to
which allows pretty complete console access, go into bios, watch boot
messages, power set the system.
The Sun 4100 is a pretty good one as well.
Patrick Hemmen wrote:
Squid runs under the user _squid and this user is in the login class
daemon in which the data size is set to infinity. Or do I have to set
a another capability?
How do you start your squid is the key.
man 5 login.conf
man 8 rc
explain it. Just putting the class there
sonjaya wrote:
http://www.openbsdsupport.org/vpn-ipsec.html
This is almost 3 years old and there is so many changes, please don't
follow this on 4.1!
I most likely will remove it if we can get an updated version.
Consider this:
http://www.serverwatch.com/tutorials/article.php/3659686
or
sonjaya wrote:
http://www.openbsdsupport.org/vpn-ipsec.html
May be you could also have a look at this nice presentation that show
many changes done on OpenBSD.
You can start here to see some OpenBSD suggestions, but you can look it
all as well as it's nice. (;
Rolf Sommerhalder wrote:
Please find below the dmesg of amd64.mp-current (snapshot 23-Aug-2007)
on a Sun Fire X4600 M2 which is equipped with four dual-core Opteron
8220 CPU, 32 GB of RAM and four built-in NICs.
Sadly, the only problem is that you will not be able to use that much
memory
K K wrote:
happens on the same approximate schedule. I suspect a power glitch.
It this is power glitch to the point of affecting your server, wouldn't
the LOM also show that to you? Then you would know the answer.
lomloghistory
Eventlog:
+0h35m1s host power on
+0h37m51s host power
Henning Brauer wrote:
bio is not implemented for mpi (yet).
bioctl in 4.2 onwards shows some inquiry data (vendor model fw serial)
for non-bio-capable disks. i. e. it falls back from bioctl -i to bioctl
-q if teh disk doesn't support bio.
Thanks Henning!
Jonathan Gray wrote:
mpi(4) currently has no bioctl support.
The 2 port LSI SAS RAID (mfi(4)) supports bioctl, however
sun don't sell any machines with this interestingly enough.
Thanks! That's what I figure, but wanted to check in case I wasn't
looking at the right place. Oh well. May be
Hi,
Quick updates on this one.
My problem is now solved and I got very nice help from some gentlemen
working at Sun that step in off list to help me out and all is now
finally work.
Nice to see some good guys following misc@ and be interested to make
sure Sun hardware (some of them anyway)
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Siju George wrote:
Can't find a DVD in
[snip]
As stated in the beginning of this thread,
DVD discs are not available, just CDs in DVD case.
Yes guys. It was my mistake in my Divine Vast Drewling extase of the
event instead of the Complete Domination release of 4.2. I
Rolf Sommerhalder wrote:
I did observe similar behaviour on four X4100 M2 as well (two with one
socket dual-core, two with two sockets dual-core Opterons) using amd64
bsd.mp snapshots from 23 and 28 Aug..
Currently, amd64 bsd.mp snapshot 28. Aug is running stable on those
four servers, although
Here is the new dmesg for current.
So far the boot process is much faster and do not hang anymore.
I am doing install on three more boxes now and will do a bunch of reboot
cycles to see the end results.
Still some acpi not configure in the dmesg, but so far does look better.
Also, note this
Tobias Weingartner wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Daniel Ouellet wrote:
So, I am not sure what testing you did, unless you built your own. new
Snapshots was just release now, witch I will be happy to test tonight
and see the results and report back.
If you guys could test out my
I have been very quiet on this for weeks now, but this really start to
piss me off at the highest level!
The bottom line is original work was stolen and copyrights are not
respected period!
Dance as much as you want around it, hide behind lawyers, word
definition twisted, false pretend,
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:35:35 -0400, Stephan Andre' wrote:
I hope one day soon OpenBSD will adopt a nice ncurses setup similar
to something like FreeBSD with ease to it.
Honestly, I don't see why. How does making the installer more
complicated is going to help anything.
I recently sat a
As we are on the subject and I do not want to deviate from the original
question, I would however appreciate suggestions as to how I can have a
one server witch can actually have up to 32 serial console to control
LOM on Sun server. I may need up to 48 in one case, but instead of using
a bunch
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
I'd love to see how an user who gets a modified binary version has the
freedom to modify it. Go ahead. Prove me that it doesn't allow some users
to loose freedom...
You make the point of using BLOB so well, Thank you!
Looking forward to see you fight for
Rolf Sommerhalder wrote:
The latest snapshot (13. Sept). of amd64 bsd.mp with ACPI enabled runs
stable on two X4100 M2 which are identically configured (single SAS
disk only, no RAID-1 yet, with current BIOS/SP/SAS Firmware from Sun).
Be caution and with reserved! Not stable if you do not add
Paul Taulborg wrote:
I appologize for not including this, here is the dmesg of a successful
boot of the amd 4.2 DEFAULT kernel:
Paul,
Not sure all the tests you did, but first do not run AMD64 on Intel
processor. I would do this first thing if you haven't done already.
- Go into BIOS and
Paul Taulborg wrote:
Kind of bummer, as I will be losing 64 bit support by use i386. This is
an Intel Xeon, which should be compatible with the amd64 branch.
I am not expert to say yes or no here. May be someone else will confirm
or deny. For now I would assume wrongly may be, but I wouldn't
Paul Taulborg wrote:
Update:
I ran boot -c with verbose on, and here are the last entries:
various probing failed messages (doesn't look like any problems), then:
ioapic0: conflicting map entries for pin 0
pctr: 686-class user-level performance counters enabled
mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR Support
Paul Taulborg wrote:
Kind of bummer, as I will be losing 64 bit support by use i386. This is
an Intel Xeon, which should be compatible with the amd64 branch.
To answer your question, I guess it depend on the version of your processor.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=117112049507303w=2
I
Paul,
If you want to try the AMD64 mp kernel with the patch I point out to you
on tech of a few days ago and see if that help you or not, I can make
the kernel I built that night for you to download and try if you trust
it. I would say to built your own, but if you want to do a quick test
Paul Taulborg wrote:
I went through every option in the BIOS, and there is nothing at all
related to ACPI. :(
Your BIOS is version 35, and there is a very long list of BIOS upgrades
from Intel. The latest one for this board, if I am not mistaken is 44
and you have 35.
bios0: vendor Intel
Paul Taulborg wrote:
Booya! Updated my BIOS to the latest version (44), and applied the patch
that was kindly provided to me here:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=118975639013313w=2
I also enabled acpi0 in the kernel by default (required to see the other
processors), and tada!
I had to
Also Paul,
Now that is working do me a favor and try to compile the userland and
kernel with that bsd.mp acpi enable kernel.
Also, try if possible to make transfer of huge files between two boxes
well connected to try to at a minimum get close to 100Mb/sec of
transfer, or more if you have
pichi wrote:
Sorry if I ran into the Big Boys forum crying. I will be more cautious about
what I ask next time. Is there a forum for people who are starting out with
OpenBSD? The thing is I am new to it and I am in a situation where reading
pages and pages of Google is taking a lot of time away
Henning Brauer wrote:
* The One [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-09-19 11:17]:
What I meant to say was that Leopard's release will solve every
current problem prevailant in OS X Tiger and people's opinions about
the Macintosh platform, although their current, so-called opinions
have no evidence behind
Boris Goldberg wrote:
I have pretty much the same picture with HP ProLiant 320 G5 (Dual Core
Pentium-D 925). The server is new and passes all tests from the HP
maintenance CD.
I couldn't make what BIOS version you were actually running there, but
you did check to make sure you
Juan Miscaro wrote:
I tried it but whenever I include the larger 'uatraps' I get:
Look at set limit table-entries.
man pf
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/09/19 19:00, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Le me know how it goes with current, I am curious as so far all feedback I
got is no one yet can get an AMD64.mp stable at this time
this must be hardware-dependent, my main desktop is amd64 MP
(opteron 175 i.e. dual-core
Hi,
Looking on the man page, the ifconfig is suppose to show the stage of
the network cards, and it can't show the proper configuration on the nfe
cards, even if I force the configuration to fix value, I always get the
same results:
nfe0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu
Here is more. May be I do not understand the reading, I understand it to
mean for example:
media: Ethernet 10baseT (1000baseSX half-duplex)
Would be hard configuration to be 10mb half-duplex and then the (xx)
would show what is actually in use.
Isn't this correct?
I may be confuse, but
SX looks plain wrong anyway. Can you provide a dmesg? This is perhaps
related to the phy that attaches to nfe rather than nfe itself.
Sure, here is one of them.
OpenBSD 4.2 (GENERIC.MP) #1378: Tue Aug 28 10:48:58 MDT 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real
OK,
To follow on this and to try to isolate more problem, I did the
following tests.
- Setup two boxes, both Sun X4100 M2.
- The source box is using i386.mp version 4.2
- The destination box is using amd64.mp version 4.2 (same with current)
- Configure public IP's on the em0 interface of
Jonathan Gray wrote:
SX looks plain wrong anyway. Can you provide a dmesg? This is perhaps
related to the phy that attaches to nfe rather than nfe itself.
A bit more. Looking in logs, etc. I found this:
nfe0: tx v2 error 0x6004
Searching on google didn't bring much other then a problem
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Jonathan Gray wrote:
SX looks plain wrong anyway. Can you provide a dmesg? This is perhaps
related to the phy that attaches to nfe rather than nfe itself.
A bit more. Looking in logs, etc. I found this:
nfe0: tx v2 error 0x6004
Searching on google didn't bring much
n0g0013 wrote:
having a nightmare getting two openbsd (one 3.8, one 4.0) boxes to
setup a tunnel. finally got the phase 1 negotiation going (or so i
believe from reviewing the logs) but it appears that the phase two
starts and is just abandoned.
This may not be the best advise, but there have
Boris Goldberg wrote:
Hello Daniel,
Just want to make sure that we are on the same page: I'm talking about
i386. It seems from below that your concern is more about amd64, but I
didn't really try it, because my CPU isn't even a Xeon.
You are 100% right. An oversight on my part here.
patrick keshishian wrote:
They seemed pretty random to me, but I did a quick
check after reading your response and I see 468 unique
fake email address @my-domain, only one was
duplicated twice.
Put greyscanner from Bob in there and sit back and enjoy the look! (;
Make sure you pick the
Claudio Jeker wrote:
Could you add the dmesg of the test box to the website?
Do you have any other network cards you could test? (I'm mostly interested
in bnx but sk, msk, bge and nfe could be interesting as well).
This box if the M2 version also come with nfe cards as well, but there
is
Tony Sarendal wrote:
On 10/3/07, *Daniel Ouellet* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Claudio Jeker wrote:
Could you add the dmesg of the test box to the website?
Do you have any other network cards you could test? (I'm mostly
interested
in bnx but sk
OK guys,
Instead of fighting about using, or not using it, or i386 being
obsolete, PAE not being good, or slow, etc.
I for one would be very happy if we can support more then 4GB of memory
on it and I would be more then happy to test it as I now have machine
that actually have more then 4GB
Alexey Suslikov wrote:
CL5 is CAS latency I think, but what does PC25100 mean here? :)
PC2-5100
ropers wrote:
On 08/10/2007, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexey Suslikov wrote:
CL5 is CAS latency I think, but what does PC25100 mean here? :)
PC2-5100
Hm, Wikipedia currently only knows PC2-5300.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDR2_SDRAM
Of course Wikipedia is infallible... ;-P
Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
how do I install xbase without reformatting and reinstalling the whole OS?
http://openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#AddFileSet
Theo de Raadt wrote:
The security benefits are at the ability to buy a steak for dinner
level.
I vote to add it to theo.c.
Thanks
Daniel
Index: src/usr.bin/mg/theo.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/mg/theo.c,v
retrieving
L. V. Lammert wrote:
Certainly! That is not the point, however. The point is that users of
OTHER 'application domains' have better security with a VM (or one of
the other approaches discussed) because THEIR environment has no ability
to interact with the OTHER environments. The digression into
Not a bad solutions, but doesn't really apply or work in a hosted
solutions for multiple virtual PBX.
Why not? Asterisk is fairly configurable in all sorts of ways.
Something as simple as having two group of users that can't dial each
other by extensions, but that use the same extensions
Didier Wiroth wrote:
hi,
i've installed 3.7 from cd and want to install mysql-server from the
ports.
unfortunately the port version only installs the client part, how do I
install the server part?
many thx
didier
If you look at the packages available, I see:
mysql-client-4.0.20.tgz
and
Yeah, but my question was about compiling different flavors. This is
because I'm dealing with an OpenBSD 3.0 machine. The search continues...
How could anyone have guess that as it wasn't in your question?
There is so much improvement from then, that it may be time to switch to
3.7...
Just FYI.
I am finishing up a port that hopefully will be put in for MySQL 4.1.12,
their latest recommended stable version.
So far all works well and pass all the tests suites stuff, with the
exception that I have to create three hard link to make it work still,
but I am working on
Per Engelbrecht wrote:
I'm about to launche a [3.7 AMD64 GENERIC.MP] mysql server (mysql
backend for a lot of servers / production environment) and would like to
test and use the new MySQL 4.1.12
I have the packages for i386 and amd64 ready for all clients, servers,
and test, or the
Damien Hull wrote:
I'm still a long ways away from designing a system. I haven't even
decided which OS I want to use. If enough people on the list can
convince me that OpenBSD is the way to go I'll install it on a system,
ship it down to Seattle and collect my mail. This will be on a test
Hi,
May be this would be better this way as I can't figure out what to do to
send the proper diff to have this put in the tree for the ports.
I am sure it's really stupid I guess as I have no problem for sending
patches for other things, but for port packages, looks like I am not
getting
Steve Shockley wrote:
I've found http://monkey.org/openbsd/archive/ports/0401/msg00044.html to
be very helpful.
Thanks Steve!
That was instructive to me!
I got my patch send at ports@ earlier tonight.
But this is good to know and will help do a bit better next time!
Thanks
Daniel
Per Engelbrecht wrote:
It's complete then :)
I would say yes. I tested it on different platform I have, run the
benchmark, tests, etc. Load a good amount of data in there and so far so
good! Obviously more testing would be good, but at first glance, it does
look very good so far.
datasize,
Miles Keaton wrote:
Do I have to learn how to make my own port?
In your case it might be easier to pack port the current version and
make your own port for 3.7 as it is already done for you in current:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/databases/postgresql/?only_with_tag=
2 weeks
Per Engelbrecht wrote:
I know these values depend on setup, utilization and more, but if you
had the-perfect-blend for a workhorse for this new port, it would be
nice. You've done some testing already. That's all.
I posted what I used for now. But really it depend on your setup. May be
you
Edy Purnomo wrote:
How to install OpenNTPD on OBSD 3.4 ?
I've read this from newsgroup but can't understand.
Please advice.
Much better, just pop in the CD and then install OBSD 3.7 and OpenNTPD
comes pre install with it! (:
Plus many other improvements as well...
Daniel
OK,
Here is a very stupid question I have to admit, but I still need to find
a way to do this.
The problem: Stupid Cisco IP phones for 7905 and 7912 DO NOT process the
EDT/EST time change properly like the higher model 7940 7960. Even
request with plenty of SmartNet to Cisco still without
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-06-02 20:57]:
How to: I wish to use the same server running ntpd from Henning as the
server, but I haven't find a way to have two daemon running on different
IP's that would be off by one hour each.
So, is it possible first
Kiraly Zoltan wrote:
mysql error: Can't create/write to file '/tmp/#sql_4c99_0.MYD'
(Errcode: 9)
snip
mysql error: Can't find file: './bsdforums/administrator.frm'
(errno: 9)
May be a simple search will help you.
Hi all,
I am trying to solve a problem I have to improve security and I am
hoping someone will have a good idea or point me to docs that may
suggest a good way to achieve this.
The setup: The various servers are only accessible from three specific
location and all is done via ssh only. Any
Roy Morris wrote:
why not have a cron job that looks in a directory, and runs file(1)
against it. parse the output and
see if it's 'really' a pdf or not? .. if yes - move it otherwise rm the
junk. Or I could be nuts once
again :)
I really wanted to avoid cronjob if possible. Yes it would
Jonathan Franks wrote:
You probably already tried this but what about having them use
something like Filezilla? it supports ftps (ssh) transfers and it's
a breeze to use.
I didn't try it, no.
I am a firm believer to use what comes with the default install. The ftp
with the
T. Wojda3a wrote:
Perhaps you might also be interested in winscp application.
http://winscp.net/eng/index.php (you've stated in the goal description
that you would like to use ftp client + you want no login account,
nevertheless I hope you'll find the information potentially useful)
Sorry for this off topic question. Looking at the archive, SK (Henning
love them! (;) is what look likes the best Ethernet cards to use, a few
months ago anyway. The network cards are changing so quickly that what
was true 6 months ago, may well not be today.
For quad, can someone confirmed,
Hi guys,
Thanks for the feedback so far. I wish there was more, but just a quick
notes, that there is not point of arguing on talking about different
cards. Just trying to find the very efficient dual or quad card that can
route almost full capacity traffic is really the goal. Having a great
C. Bensend wrote:
Hey folks,
I've been pouring over the archives for a couple of days now,
looking for recommendations for a Pentium IV motherboard for a new
server I'm building. I've found a lot of AMD and AMD64 posts, but
hardly any P4s. I would really appreciate any suggestions from any
Edy Purnomo wrote:
hi,
trying to:
block all pop3 to outbound connection BUT allow one client AND inbound
(local mail server) connection.
any suggestion ?
-edy-
Read the informations available here:
http://openbsd.org/faq/pf/index.html
Or even a very good step by step with a lots of
Here a question I found interesting for my own education, and I am
trying to come to peace with as far as applications usage with dual
core, or multi-processor vs single one.
I was asking myself if I would actually benefit from a dual core
processor, or multi-processor system in a routing
Thank you to Otto, Ted and Joachim for your answers and time.
It confirmed most of my thinking and I was happy to see different point
of view on the subject. So, I can spend my money a bit more wisely, or
pretend to anyway! (:
Thanks
Daniel
may seem overly critical in debate but I still believe the work of
Daniel Ouellet and the HOWTO writers has been a worthwhile experiment.
Though it has opened the door for the blind leading blind, only by
experimenting with new ideas will one be able to prove or disprove their
validity
1 - 100 of 1128 matches
Mail list logo
