* On 2002.03.29, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Shawn McMahon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> begin quoting what David Champion said on Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 12:58:32PM -0600:
> > No, not really. It's marketing.
>
> The definition of OS isn't
* On 2002.03.29, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Shawn McMahon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> SunOS 5.8 is a component of the Solaris operating environment. Guess
> what OS stands for? SunOS 5.8 is the KERNEL, not the operating
> environment.
That's not actually true. "SunOS" refers to the k
* On 2002.03.27, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Mark J. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 02:07:59AM +0100, Sven Guckes wrote:
> >
> > $ TIMEFMT="%D" ./timediff "4/6/67" "3/28/02"
> > Difference is 11773.96 days.
> Besides the fraction, that's just plain wrong.
> 19
* On 2002.03.27, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Sven Guckes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> apropos:
> anyone have a utility to calculate the
> number of days between two given dates?
> i mean - easily? no perl script
> with dozens of modules, please!
shell$ ./timediff "Wed Mar 27 17:33:00 20
* On 2002.03.27, in <20020328002936.GA2447@blackscarab>,
* "cruciatuz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i had some complaints, that mutt(?) sets the wrong date in my outgoing
> email. i checked the "date" command and my bios-configuration, and both
> are ok. where else do i have to check in o
* On 2002.03.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Rocco Rutte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It thought Solaris users use text-based mail clients because workstation
> installations of Solaris are not the fastest. Or do they just replace
I thought we used text-based mail clients for the same re
* On 2002.03.25, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Sven Guckes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Simon White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-25 21:22]:
> > 25-Mar-02 at 02:00, Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > > seriously - mutt sends email. that's it.
> > > if your users don't read their ema
* On 2002.03.21, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Jerry Van Brimmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I am using sendmail, but I have no clue as to where sendmail's log file is.
> Do you know?
Sendmail doesn't keep an independent log file. All its logs are routed
through the syslog service, so t
* On 2002.03.20, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Rocco Rutte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There's only one thing I really miss: I'd like to be abled to define my
> own commands. Something like:
>
> define ''
> define ''
This is why my muttrc looks like this:
source "~/.m
* On 2002.03.20, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Sven Guckes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Tres Hofmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-20 08:04]:
> > I'm wondering if there's a way to bind
> > complete and complete-query to the same key,
> > rather than two keys as shown in the manual:
>
> yo
* On 2002.03.19, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Rob Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 5:02 PM EST on March 19 David Champion sent off:
> > But doesn't OpenPGP sign data before encrypting it? If so, when it sees
> > an encrypted message, it cann
* On 2002.03.19, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Phil Gregory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Dave Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-19 21:41 +]:
>
> I believe the problem is that mutt shouldn't even be trying to verify the
> signature since there isn't one. I'd say that the message about
* On 2002.03.17, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Claus Assmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (sorry, I don't read mutt-dev anymore, I'm getting more than 500
> mails a day (obviously I can only skim through the subjects and
> read only a subset...))
Lars doesn't read mutt-users anymore for th
* On 2002.03.17, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Claus Assmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I asked about this when 1.3.25 came out and got the answer that
> "this should be fixed" / "will be looking into it". However, 1.3.28
> still can't be configured without iconv. Any chance for a change?
* On 2002.03.15, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Shawn McMahon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, David Champion wrote:
> >
> > Personally, I don't like the idea of hard-coding mutt to recognize
> > mailing lists a
* On 2002.03.15, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Brian C. Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am getting the following error when compiling 1.3.28
> with gcc 3.0.4 (64-bit) mode.
>
> Any ideas?
I don't know much about this particularly, but all the problems I've had
while using gcc
On 2002.03.13, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Ken Weingold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, cool. So the following means that mutt doesn't need any of the
> ncurses libraries at all after the binary is built?
>
> ./mutt:
> -lintl.1 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.1
> -liconv.2
On 2002.03.13, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Ken Weingold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks again for all the help and suggestions. The problem was indeed
> ncurses. I installed it into my home dir and mutt built perfectly.
> But I can't keep it, since it takes up a good percentage of my q
On 2002.03.10, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Ken Weingold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks, but I was thinking more about how mutt will know to look for
> everything in the system directories. I was thinking of building mutt
> and just copying the binary into ~/bin.
My mutt only needs
I hadn't really meant to make this a mutt-users topic, but
On 2002.03.07, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Simon White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In an ideal world:
>
> $ ./configure --enable-liability --disable-benefit
Perhaps. So why doesn't mutt include every patch available as a
conf
On 2002.03.05, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jeremy Blosser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 28, Volker Moell [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > Is there a posibillity to score all known mail addresses (i.e. all
> > addresses defined in aliases) in o
On 2002.03.05, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Bob McLaren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would any of you know of a simple, command-line based Linux SMTP client that is
> as easy to use as Mutt for sending mime attachments?
> I really like the fact that Mutt handles all the mime encoding so I don
On 2002.03.05, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"John Buttery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What in the name of all that is holy are you _doing_ in there?!
He's set save_name, probably. I only have 2000 mboxes in mine, but Sven
probably sends mail more broadly than I do.
--
-D.[EMAIL
On 2002.03.01, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Andrew P. Bell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I do a group-reply, how can I automatically filter out *my* email
> address?
>
> I'm already writing all sent messages to folders with save_name and I'm
> getting a second useless mail unless I manua
On 2002.02.27, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"parv" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> fmt is very inadequate, compared to 'gq', when it comes to wrapping
> of quoted lines. just try it, you will see.
Yes, but to get "gq", I have to use vim. That's even worse. I recommend
par if you feel that fmt
On 2002.02.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"MuttER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Thomas Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-26-02 08:32] crowed:
> > On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, David T-G wrote:
> > > The short answer to your question is simply that you need to have an MTA
> > > that will queue up your ma
On 2002.02.25, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David Champion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In other words, this looks like a mutt bug.
>
> You might try setting $pop_authenticators to work around this. The goal
> would be not to try authenticating wi
On 2002.02.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jerry Van Brimmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> < .
> pop_authenticate: Using any available method.
> > AUTH CRAM-MD5
> < + PDMyNzU3LjEwMjAyMjMxMjUzMzRAaXNwd2VzdGVtYWlsLmFjZXdlYi5uZXQ+
> mutt_sasl_cb_authname: getting authname for pop3.ispwest.com:11
On 2002.02.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jerry Van Brimmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I thought Mutt was a terminal based email client that could as much or
> more than other email clients. So, I was hoping that I could just download all
> messages into my mailbox and the headers w
On 2002.02.20, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Aaron Schrab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 14:15 -0800 20 Feb 2002, Mun Johl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I tried another test and fired up mutt in dtterm instead of rxvt.
> > dtterm displayed the umlauts correctly, so I don't understand why the
On 2002.02.20, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David Ellement" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 020220, at 18:00:45, Stefan Frank wrote
> > It doesn't seem to work when dgc's attachment patch is applied. I
> > checked this against an unpatched mutt - it stopped working after the
> > patch was appl
On 2002.02.19, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Justin R. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If not, I'd just use a Mutt call with -f and push in a delete pattern to
> clear out the old stuff.
This won't work from a crontab, though. When mutt has no terminal, it
ignores -e actions and acts
On 2002.02.14, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Nick Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've just had to print an entire mbox file, it wasn't that many messages
> but it was a painful process as I didn't think of a way to only print
> the /actuall/ message bodies (and perhaps TO, From)
>
> I
On 2002.02.13, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Andre Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My setup (below) tells procmail to source the addresses in
> ~/.procmail/spam, and add the message to my spam/ Maildir:
Looks like you have a file (~/.procmail/spam) containing e-mail
addresses of peopl
On 2002.02.04, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Charles Jie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>- If you code something to achieve it, you lose the COLORs.
But losing the colors is a *good thing*. :) color_ls hurts my eyes.
Ouch.
> *3. Mutt's file browser - also mix up directories and files, which
On 2002.02.01, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Will Yardley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William Wu wrote:
> >
> > sometimes, I send some mails with bcc field filled, but in the sent
> > mailbox the recipients are not showed,
>
> that's why it's called Bcc (blind carbon copy)
This sort of do
On 2002.01.31, in <20020201045411.GB18136@ganymede>,
"Brian Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> IOW, I'm trying to replace these (a lot more than 3):
>
> color index yellow default "~f feefee ~N"
> color index yellow default "~f geegee ~N"
> color index yellow default "~f heehee ~N"
>
On 2002.01.27, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Sven Guckes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * JASH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020127 17:46]:
> > Is it possible to kill the last oldest messages in Maildir
> > automaticly, for example if mails past 1000 already?
>
> yes. but mutt won't do this unless you
On 2002.01.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Mike Schiraldi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > also, since most people on the list don't know you in real life, all
> > they know is that you're the same person who has always been writing
> > email under that name and with that PGP key. there's no
On 2002.01.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Nick Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * and then Maarten den Braber blurted
> > Maybe it's A Good Thing to give an example to ;-), here it is:
> >
> > bind index r noop
> > bind index m noop
>
> What's a noop?
No-op: no operation [on th
On 2002.01.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David T-G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew, et al --
>
> ...and then David Champion said...
> %
> % set editor="vi '+/^-- $/;,$d'"
>
> Note that this will actually strip your
On 2002.01.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"matthew pritchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to strip signatures when replying to mails? Slrn seems
> to automatically do this for me 'out of the box' (There's a
> strip_sig_regexp variable). I've searched on google, and the best I
On 2002.01.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Nick Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 'ello
> What kind of monster is would a message containing multipart/alternative
> be? Is there somewhere that gives idiots guides to mime types?
It's a multipart type that provides multiple alternative vi
On 2002.01.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Richard G. Ball" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> mutt -nz -F $HOME/.mutt/mutt.archiving -f test-folder -e "push 'T~d -01/01/02
> ;s archivetest
> q'"
>
> but it isn't *quite* working. The file to which the messages are
> written isn't ar
On 2002.01.22, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a graceful way to change the Subject: lines on
> a set of tagged messages? Often folks will change the
> ...
> I tried the '|' pipe function, ";|..." piping to:
>
> sed 's/^Subject: .*$/Subject: Re: This
On 2002.01.22, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"John Buttery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> By the way, is there any way to get mutt to start composing _after_
> the quoted text instead of before it when replying?
set editor="vi '+$;?^>?;+'"
+ begin vi initialization commands
$
On 2002.01.21, in <20020121164625.GB2845@neuromancer>,
"giorgian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:35:15PM -0600, David Champion wrote:
> > This message is in enriched text. Here's some text in boldfaced type.
> > Here&#
On 2002.01.19, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Thomas Hurst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Michael Elkins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> > > Some mailinglists prefix every subject with the name of the list.
> > > Is it possible to suppress this prefix in the index_form
On 2002.01.17, in <20020117164300.GB3131@knute>,
"Knute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >response to one I posted from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that had a virus
> >attached to it (.mp3.pif).
>
> LOL... That's not even a virus, it's a shortcut to the executable!
Viruses/worms can be embedded in a
On 2002.01.13, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David T-G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't necessarily agree that mutt should spit out a message, though I
> can see that this could be confusing. What I would do would be to go
> ...
> % Feedback is an important element of any user interfac
On 2002.01.12, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Rob 'Feztaa' Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> options:
> ...
> -g specify a newsserver (if compiled with NNTP)
> -G select a newsgroup (if compiled with NNTP)
> ...
Well, note the "if compiled with NNTP" part -
> Compile options:
>
On 2002.01.12, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Rob 'Feztaa' Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Which manual? The man page for the muttrc just says that "%g expands to
> the newsgroup if mutt is compiled with nntp support", there is nothing
> else about nntp in there.
The mutt man page shows:
On 2002.01.09, in <1010610421.2294.0.camel@panucho>,
"Ilkka Tuohela" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> =company/business
> which will be translated to imap://imap.company.com/Mail/business
> =private/brother
> and a folder like imap://isp-imap.isp.com/Mail/brother
> ...
> Of cou
On 2002.01.08, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Todd Kokoszka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want messages to disappear after I mark them deleted
> or saved. Is there a way to do this in Mutt?
When the view limit is set to !~D, deleted message are present, but not
visible in the index view. Unfo
On 2002.01.08, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Nick Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sounds fine to me Sam, I don't know what VISUAL is though?
> I presume it's a config var, I'll go look it up on the manual.
> Is that why I sometimes see headers with X-editor: Vim?
>
> How will other app
On 2002.01.07, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Michael Montagne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a macro that deletes older messages in the current folder.
> macro index T"~d>2w !~F"D"~T"
> Does anyone have any idea how I might apply this to all my folders with
> one blazingly fast keystroke
On 2002.01.07, in <20020107113541.GA629@shanti>,
"Franco Vite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> before my browser was
>
> 1 r L 29 dic [MaX] 0,3K Archivi ML PPC?
> 2 F 30 dic [Franco Vite] 0,8K >
>
> Now is
>
> 1 r L 29 dic [MaX] 0,3K Archivi ML PPC?
> 2 F 30
On 2002.01.07, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Benjamin Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gary Johnson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > - there's just too much noise
> >
> > I don't know what to do about that, except to post less often myself.
>
> And, ironically, he mailed the list to tell u
On 2002.01.07, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Nick Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes I mean /like/ HTML, but *not* HTML as I dump anything of nature
> also. I guess my understanding of real ASCII text is mistaken. I thought
> that because I saw bold text in mails sent to me (back when I was
> ex
On 2002.01.04, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Rob 'Feztaa' Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alas! Cameron Simpson spake thus:
> > | I'm pretty sure I've seen this done somewhere, but I can't find it.
> >
> > Well, it's indirect, but you could wrap mutt in a script which said:
> >
> > #!/
On 2002.01.03, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"rhad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 1) understand how exactly mutt recieves email. In my first several
> attempts, I slowly gathered the impression that mutt wanted me to configure
> at least sendmail and fetchmail in addition to mutt. I.e.: that
On 2002.01.01, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David T-G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> %
> % But because it's a sourcer-level patch that I need to
> % patch-compile-install. I'm afraid that might cause trouble with my
> % current installation from rpm package by Mandrake 8.1.
>
> Hmmm... That
On 2002.01.03, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Thorsten Haude" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well done, David, now I'm back to step one, $from-wise. Why is 'set
> from=' different from 'my_hdr From: '?
$from was introduced in pre-1.0 times to work around problems with hooks
and my_hdr. Somethi
On 2001.12.31, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Will Yardley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Srivastava, Mohit wrote:
>
> > we have Solaris 5.7
> > we tried installing GNU C compiler buw were having problems.
> > It would be great if u can add for for Solaris .
>
> a few things...
>
> 1) you're
On 2001.12.29, in <20011229142045.GA78483@noname>,
"Paulius Bulotas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to change colour of messages which are older by x days
> then today? If yes, then how it's done?
Section 4.2.3 of the manual tells you. For example:
color index bl
On 2001.12.28, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Charles Jie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Obviously I don't mean 'e' (edit) command count.
>
> The purpose of it is that I want to give keywords or category to read messages so
>that I can search them easier later.
>
> If I can add this field easi
On 2001.12.06, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Prahlad Vaidyanathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 06 Dec 2001 Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed into the ether:
> > Well I am not sure what you call that information bar above the
> > pager. But would it not be useful if the names of
On 2001.12.09, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Matej Cepl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> However, emails in this list have mungled Reply-To: directing to
> the list. Could it be possible to ask procmail (or how to ask
> procmail) that before moving the message to the listy folder, it
> would ru
On 2001.11.27, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Thomas Roessler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This probably depends on the particular uudecode implementation you
> are using... I've seen uudecode only decode the _first_ attachment.
Some uudecodes even choke if there's any material in the inp
On 2001.11.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Patrik Modesto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is no Content-Type header. There is:
> ...
> then few empty lines and then the encoded file above. I can get to the
> PC that sends this "attachments" so I will check it's MSOE setup.
It's not na
On 2001.11.16, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Thorsten Haude" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this one bothers me for some time:
> I use
> macro index d "=admin/trash\n" "Move mail to trashcan"
> to get mail out of the way. If I change the mailbox after that, the
> first entry in the
On 2001.11.13, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Rob 'Feztaa' Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hmmm, I tried that with vim... it kinda screws up the quoting. It
> works great for my own writing, though. Example:
Yes, that's one of the ways that par's abilities exceed fmt's. Par is
fairly tole
On 2001.11.13, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Will Yardley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> mutt doesn't have an editor, so this is a function of your editor. in
> vim you can use :set tw=74 or :set textwidth=74
>
> nvi and other vi clones should be the same, but you can't use 'gqip' or
> 'gqa
On 2001.11.02, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Will Yardley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hit whatever key you have bound to (i think g by
> default?)... however you should generally avoid doing this. if people
> want to be cc'd or replied to privately, they will probably have
> 'set-followu
Ah, mutt -- making the world smaller again.
On 2001.10.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jeremy Hankins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> First of all, I'd like to see the hostname portion of the Message-ID in
> the index (assuming there is one, of course). I find that quite useful
> on occa
On 2001.10.25, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Rob 'Feztaa' Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 10:21:30AM -0400, David T-G (dis)graced my inbox with:
> > Note that I have found, from recent discussion, that gkrellm (and perhaps
> > other new mail programs) improperly handl
On 2001.10.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"R . Leponce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all mutt-users !!
>
> Is there a way to limit the size of CC and To field when receiving an email also
>sent to
> many users ?
I had this problem with mail forwarded from my VMS account; its mail
fac
On 2001.10.18, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Manuel Hendel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to use the compressed folders patch with maildir. What
> happens than. Does every mail gets compressed, or how does this work
> with maildir?
This patch really isn't particular to compressio
On 2001.10.05, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Tim Whitehead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have emails that I want to resend from ~/Mail/sent. Is there a key binding for
> this?
, esc-e.
--
-D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniversity of Chicago
On 2001.10.03, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Benjamin Michotte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> if I look in the mutt manual, I can find the definition of index_format
> but not hdr_format.
>
> They seems to do the same but what's the difference between them ?
They're synonymous. From i
On 2001.10.03, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"René Clerc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I thinkt the problem lies with the "$"; I think it needs to be
> escaped.
I think $EDITOR is not defined. To be fully traditional, you should have
${VISUAL:-${EDITOR:-vi}}, or something like that -- it es
On 2001.10.01, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Frederik Vanrenterghem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying out some ways to clear text sign a message in mutt, using
> :%!gpg -eas
>
> Unfortunately, all headers (including "to") are signed, effectively
> making these headers useless. Is there
On 2001.09.22, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Vincent Lefevre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've seen spaces appended to the end of lines in mutt when cutting and
> > pasting, but it went away when I switched to vt100, I think.
>
> I don't want to use vt100 because
> * I want to know (by
On 2001.09.19, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David T-G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Actually, I don't think so; that's what's so interesting. I'd love to
> see the results of same experiment under 2.6 and 8;
Weird: I find that 7 behaves as 9 does -- '[A-Z][a-z]'
'[N-Z][A-M][n-z][a-m]' wor
On 2001.09.19, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David T-G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> % $ grep rot-13 ~/.mailcap
> % text/rot-13; tr '[A-Z][a-z]' '[N-Z][A-M][n-z][a-m]' <%s; copiousoutput
>
> Hey, that's slick. I just might have to try that one!
>
> You need to lose the extra brackets, though
On 2001.09.19, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Miguel Farah F." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jura ernqvat arjf jvgu gva, vs bar cerffrf gur 'q' xrl, gur pbagrag bs
> gur negvpyr orvat ernq jvyy or ebg13-rq.
>
> V guvax zhgg pbhyq unir guvf pncnovyvgl, gbb. Jung V qb pheeragyl vf
> cvcr gur znvy
On 2001.09.17, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Cliff Sarginson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
> I like to have threads collapsed by default.
> However I would like some indication in the index display
> that a message is the first in a thread.
> Anyone know how I can do this ?
Use %M, or %?
On 2001.09.16, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David T-G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> % Quoting FreeBSD's "man sh" [from the listing of special parameters]:
> % | @ Expands to the positional parameters, starting from one.
> % | When the expansion occurs within double-quotes,
On 2001.09.09, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Cliff Sarginson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - What is the purpose/use of "scoring" of mail messages?
I'm sure that people use it in different ways, but fundamentally, it's
just a ratings system. You can value/devalue messages according to the
resu
On 2001.09.06, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Thomas Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There's also "Enable Alternate Screen Switching". Just glancing at the
> changelog, it appears I added that around patch #90.
Hmm, I'm using patch 150, but I don't see that in my menu. I did find
the t
On 2001.09.06, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Thomas Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> or better yet, it's a popup entry in XFree86 xterm.
I don't use XFree86. I think that its xterm was the same as the one on
your web site, though, which I do use (on Solaris).
I see the "Show Alternate
On 2001.09.06, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Denis Perelyubskiy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> also, neither do i know if this is an *official* bash way,
> but things like these work in my startup files, even though
> maybe they disgust people who really know bash :)
What bothers me about th
On 2001.09.06, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Denis Perelyubskiy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> the problem with outlook is that it also sends a plain text
> copy along with html one. so i DO NOT WANT to start any kind
> of browser, dump some output, then look at it in my pager if
> i can some
On 2001.09.02, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Eric Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to apply all that comprise lists in the `lists' or
> `subscribe' command to regex such as this
>
> send-hook "~C mutt-users" 'set signature="echo Eric Smith|"'
>
> So instead of explicitly spe
On 2001.08.29, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Eric Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can I configure mutt to implicitly prepend the '=' or '+' to a
> user specified mailbox like in .
> I can remap the 'c' command for example to print the '=' for me so
> then I only need enter the folder na
On 2001.08.26, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"peter horst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to be able to flag an entire thread with "!": is this possible?
> When I tried esc-t'ing a thread, then using ;w, it didn't work--it gave
> me the "Set flag? (D/N/O/r/*/!):" message that I expected,
On 2001.08.08, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Ken Weingold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now sure if I should be worried about it, but I get this on the last
> line from running make on 1.3.20i:
>
> muttlib.c:73: warning: mktemp() possibly used unsafely; consider using mkstemp()
It's just gcc
On 2001.08.07, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Brian Salter-Duke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > macro index \Co "addlist ~/.mutt/lists" "Scan a message for
>mailing lists to add"
> > macro pager \Co "addlist ~/.mutt/lists" "Scan a message for
>mailing lists to add"
>
> To get these to wo
On 2001.08.06, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Mike Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> All that would be necessary is a maillist_file setting in my .muttrc
> just like alias_file, and add a command to add addresses to it. Although
> it'd be a nice bonus, it's not even necessary to autopars
On 2001.08.06, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Ailbhe Leamy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've been reformatting text using par, before editing it in vi.
> Basically, I've changed my editor to a script that pipes the message
> through par and then opens it in vi. The only trouble with thi
401 - 500 of 636 matches
Mail list logo
