On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 02:35:30PM -0700, googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 01:13:52PM +1000, raf via Mutt-users wrote:
> - if the mailing list does mess with msgid, it absolutely must do it
> consistently for all copies of the message.
For existing software
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 01:13:52PM +1000, raf via Mutt-users wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 10:53:41AM -0400, Derek Martin
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 01:19:09PM +, Ебрашка wrote:
> > > Question, what should I write in .muttrc to make my outgoing
&
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 09:25:56AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 11:33:55AM -0400, Derek Martin wrote:
> > If so that feature may not be working correctly...
>
> That is the old format for the mutt version I'm using. The new format
> looks like
>
>
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 08:05:06AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 10:53:41AM -0400, Derek Martin wrote:
> > The unfathomable thing about this question is why you (or anyone)
> > should care in the slightest what your message ID looks like.
>
> That'
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 01:19:09PM +, Ебрашка wrote:
> Question, what should I write in .muttrc to make my outgoing mails have
> the same beautiful message-ID as Yandex mail?
The unfathomable thing about this question is why you (or anyone)
should care in the slightest what your message ID
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 11:21:21AM -0700, googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org
wrote:
> ...this type of issue is really tricky because one has to be sure to
> *build* against the packaged (i.e. non-base) libraries, including
> cases like libncurses. IIRC this is far from automatic, some packages
> as
Sandeep,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 10:21:30AM +0800, Sadeep Madurange wrote:
> On 2024-03-29 16:47:22, Derek Martin wrote:
> > [*] Except in extremely rare and completely esoteric cases that apply
> > only to experts... and by now should really apply to no one.
>
> Th
http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02
-=-=-=-=-
This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in
undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2024, at 13:47, Derek Martin wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 0
On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 07:41:45PM +0800, Sadeep Madurange wrote:
> Initially, LANG was unset and LC_CTYPE="C". The character encoding was
> US-ASCII. I changed these variables (i.e., LANG, LC_CTYPE and locale
> settings) to en_US.UTF-8. Then the ? changed to ?. So, looks like you
> are on to
On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 11:11:33PM -, Jeffery Small wrote:
> I have a script that fires up mutt in an xfce4-terminal window. In my ksh
> shell .kshrc file, I use stty to disable (undef) the stop (^S) and start
> (^Q) characters. However, when I run mutt as follows:
I don't have ksh
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 07:45:05PM -0400, John Hawkinson wrote:
> Derek Martin wrote on Wed, 31 Aug 2022
> at 19:35:15 EDT in <20220831233515.gf13...@bladeshadow.org>:
>
> Evaluating the strength of a SHOULD requires looking at pragmatic
> realities. And that reality is
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 04:38:11PM -0400, John Hawkinson wrote:
> I don't mean to monopolize the conversation, but:
>
> Derek Martin wrote on Wed, 31 Aug 2022
> at 15:48:55 EDT in <20220831194855.gc13...@bladeshadow.org>:
>
> > I don't see why this matters, because as
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 05:43:41PM -0400, John Hawkinson wrote:
> John Hawkinson wrote on Wed, 31 Aug 2022
> at 16:38:11 EDT in :
>
> > I suppose I should send some 2,000-character paragraph emails as
> > tests to see what happens, but I very much doubt there will be
> > problems as a result.
>
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 07:57:43PM +0200, Francesco Ariis wrote:
> > The problem is popular modern mobile and web-based MUAs don't handle
> > this and can make unexpected linewrap decisions. It's no issue when
> > emailing UNIX nerds, but non-nerds think I'm doing something wrong.
>
> I do not
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 01:46:49PM -0400, John Hawkinson wrote:
> Derek Martin wrote on Wed, 31 Aug 2022
> at 13:39:42 EDT in <20220831173942.gb13...@bladeshadow.org>:
>
> > It's been my experience that if you read your mail on anything other
> > than a phone, the 72-c
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 07:10:14AM -0400, John Hawkinson wrote:
> Kurt Hackenberg wrote on Mon, 29 Aug 2022 at 02:58:32 EDT in
> :
>
> > If you put a newline only at the end of a paragraph, it won't be
> > displayed correctly by software that doesn't expect that. Such
> > software will
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 10:10:38AM +0200, martin f krafft via Mutt-users wrote:
> Thanks for your responses so far!
>
> The reason I need this index is that I have to provide evidence of "a huge
> volume of mails" on a given topic, without actually sharing the emails.
If this is all you need to
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 01:02:39PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 09:17:11AM +, Sam Kuper wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 04:59:41PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 09:33:44PM +, Sam Kuper wrote:
> > Or they coul
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 10:10:38AM +0200, martin f krafft via Mutt-users wrote:
> > I don't think it will be better or easier than what you've done. But
> > you could try using a '|' filter in $index_format to append some output
> > to a file as a side effect. It would still entail manually
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 09:17:11AM +, Sam Kuper wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 04:59:41PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 09:33:44PM +, Sam Kuper wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 09:22:31PM +0200, martin f krafft via Mutt-users
> >>
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 09:33:44PM +, Sam Kuper wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 09:22:31PM +0200, martin f krafft via Mutt-users
> wrote:
> > For reasons you don't want to know,
>
> You may be underestimating the curiosity of your audience.
I suspect what Sam really meant was, "For reasons
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 06:23:56PM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Sorry if the question is off-topic, hopefully not completely though.
>
> I am wondering what's the best way to use different SMTP servers to send
> mails, depending on which e-mail account I am currently using
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 08:15:31AM +0200, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have custom macro "q" for exit:
>
> macro index q ";"
>
> but when I open mailbox read-only, I am not able to exit from mutt:
AFAICT this macro does nothing useful--the normal quit (normally bound
to 'q')
On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 10:04:37AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 10:12:39AM -0400, hy...@nasalinux.net wrote:
> > So, even though I have renumbered all of my emails to be 1-1, mutt
> > still sees the deleted former-email numbered 56789 and uses that in the
> > "next
On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 10:40:22AM +1000, raf via Mutt-users wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 01:47:06PM -0400, Kurt Hackenberg
> wrote:
> > set indent_string = '>'
> >
> > You could argue that should be the default value of $indent_string.
>
> Not successfully. Changing a default affects all
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 11:06:38AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 12:36:39PM -0500, X Tec wrote:
> > set sendmail="/usr/bin/msmtp [...] --passwordeval=$(gpg --no-tty -q -d
> > ~/.user.gpg)"
[...]
> > Hope someone else could give other advise, or if this is really not
>
On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 01:07:07AM -0400, José María Mateos wrote:
> On Mon, May 2, 2022, at 23:25, lilydjwg wrote:
> > Google doesn't disable app passwords (requires 2FA). Google is going to
> > disable account passwords login at the end of this month.[1]
> >
> > I've switched to OAuth because I
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 11:08:41AM +, Joel Buckley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been using mutt for some time on a VT510 terminal (similar to
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VT520), and enjoying it.
An actual serial hardware terminal? Those are getting to be rare
beasts indeed... ;-)
> The
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 07:53:28AM -0700, Lee wrote:
> Can you use the pipe function on specific fields, like subject, from,
> date...?
You can, indirectly, by writing a script that does it, and using pipe
to call the script. It might be easier to use ignore/unignore to only
show the headers you
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 08:13:15PM -0400, John Hawkinson wrote:
> Derek Martin wrote on Mon, 25 Oct 2021
> at 19:00:12 EDT in <20211025230012.gc9...@bladeshadow.org>:
>
> > Cost? I see no cost, other than the time needed to physically check
>
> My Oct. 7 email, to wh
On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 11:52:02PM -0400, John Hawkinson wrote:
> ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote on Thu, 7 Oct 2021
> at 23:32:00 EDT in :
>
> > Any email client (including mobile email clients) worth its salt is
> > going to wrap the subject line (at least in the email view, if not
> > in the index
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:20:09PM -, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2021-02-12, Derek Martin wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 05:09:36PM -, Grant Edwards wrote:
> >> On 2021-02-12, Derek Martin wrote:
> >> >>> as I would have to be monitor
On 01Feb2021 16:03, ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote:
> sending emails might well be time-sensitive, and I _need_ to know
> that it went through (or get immediate feedback if it fails).
So let's be clear: If you have time-sensitive communications that
need to be delivered immediately, reliably, you should
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 05:09:36PM -, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2021-02-12, Derek Martin wrote:
> >>> as I would have to be monitoring the logs to make sure the e-mail
> >>> was actually sent.
> >>
> >> You do (or you need to make sure that
On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 04:34:47PM -, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2021-02-01, José María Mateos wrote:
> > I was thinking about this. I have offlineimap running, so I have a
> > local copy of all my mail, but the SMTP connection still goes
> > through my mail provider, not locally. While I can
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 11:09:40AM -0600, Peng Yu wrote:
> I want to remove `To: undisclosed-recipients: ;` in the generated
> message when no To or Cc recipients are specified. I don't see an
> option to do this in the manual. Could anybody let me know if there is
> an option to remove it?
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 08:42:31AM -0600, Peng Yu wrote:
> mutt can adjust the charset based on the input. But it seems that
> EmailMessage from python can not do this automatically. How does mutt
> choose the charset automatically based on the content? Thanks.
You pasted the answer:
>
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 08:23:18PM -0600, Peng Yu wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 11:23 AM Will Yardley
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 08:57:32AM -0600, Peng Yu wrote:
> > >
> > > When I use mutt to construct an outgoing email, is there a way not to
> > > set the message id? Thanks.
> >
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 06:33:37PM +0100, Claus Assmann wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021, Will Yardley wrote:
>
> > Even if Mutt doesn't set one, the first MTA it hits will add one. Not
>
> Not really - a MTA should not make such changes. A MSA should do
> it,
I'd say this is needlessly
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 10:01:21AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 02:56:56PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 02:21:22PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:49:52AM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > I can't say
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 02:21:22PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:49:52AM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 08:30:42AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> > > The same place in a mbox hierarchy shows me the size of the maibox and
> >
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 08:30:42AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 07:01:25PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 08:29:22PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> > > > > This is by no means a show stopper, I'm going to stay with maildir,
>
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:10:28PM -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 18:55:51 -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> ...
> > On Unix systems, at least
> > for most file systems, the size of a directory is the space occupied
> > by the blocks nee
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 06:09:49PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> Yes, Olaf Hering submitted a patch in 1.10, zeroing out the directory size
> for the reason you site below:
>
> > However the size of a directory is very likely not what you think it is,
> > and is not particularly useful to
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 08:29:22PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> > That's most likely a "last edited" date. Adding flags or labels to a
> > message would have reset that time as well. These directories were last
> > edited on the date you created them, so not much is going to change
> > that. You'd
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 05:02:08PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> However there is a minor downside in the file browser (well directory
> browser really isn't it), the information shown against the
> directories (at the bottom level these are maildir mailboxes) is
> pretty useless, what I am seeing
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 01:33:24PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> Just to report success. It all appears to be working as I want with
> 'real' directories for my mail hierarchy.
Glad to hear it.
> It was basically quite simple to do, mostly using 'find', first to
> create a copy of my old mbox
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 05:46:53PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> Does mutt still use the (IMHO silly) maildir hierarchy where mail
> 'folders' are simply represented by another '.' and name in the
> maildir directory name?
I'm not sure why you think Mutt is doing this... I have my maildir
folders
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 01:40:08AM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> I don't like the attachment approach but the formatting (minimal,
> bold, alignment,?) he uses and the 2 column arrangement would be useful.
> Of course, my using constant width characters and spaces kills
> any alignment my recipients
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 12:26:01AM +0300, Leho Kraav wrote:
> One of the replies mentioned something about "tasteful" or similar. For
> me, mail is not a fashion statement, it needs to get work done, so not
> giving that taste argument much weight.
> [...]
> Other than that, haven't seen a any
On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 12:24:35PM +0300, Leho Kraav wrote:
> Hi. I'm looking for a way to get mutt index to segment list display with
> Today, Yesterday, Last Week, 2 weeks ago etc separators.
>
> Feels like it should be technically possible, but I haven't been able to
> find a configuration or
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 08:37:50AM +0200, Sebastian Stein wrote:
> Kevin J. McCarthy [200716 18:18]:
> > If the access time is earlier than the modification time, it notifies for
> > new mail.
>
> Wow, what a bad algorithm. I mean, this was probably perfect 20 years ago,
> but in times of
Oops, if I'd seen this message before I sent my last post, I probably
wouldn't have bothered to post it.
That said, I will take issue with the notion that mbox is a terrible
format: It isn't. It does, however, have usage patterns for which
it is not well suited... just like maildir does. If
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 03:27:29PM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
> Unfortunately, one of the weaknesses in Python's email handling (which
> might be related to some ambiguities or flaws in the RFCs on which they
> are based - I'm not sure) relates to the problem of identifying a
> "primary" (for want of
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 01:46:26PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Yeah, I've been trying to explain this to some folks around here
> > recently, but not having much success. You have my sympathy.
>
> Agreed. It is frustrating. But Derek, please don't give up!
I gave up a LOOONG time ago.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 06:57:14PM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
> > When you're talking about a population of people, who is being
> > inconsiderate, those who do what the majority prefer, or the minority
> > who have made up their own mind that their way is better despite
> > what everyone else does?
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My company uses PGP/GPG when sending sensitive material through email.
> Unfortunately (for them and me), most people use Outlook and our IT
> guy refuses to install any Outlook plugin for them to properly handle
> encypted
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 03:49:46PM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 06:08:37PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 01:09:12PM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 09:32:01AM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> >>> On W
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 01:55:16AM -, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2020-04-18, Derek Martin wrote:
>
> > Termite emulates an RS-232 terminal--a simple (AKA "dumb") ASCII
> > terminal, whereas rxvt has a more complex interface that allows
> > sending and receiv
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 10:09:29AM -0400, Jaron Kent-Dobias wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to replace rxvt-unicode with termite, and am having trouble with
> my mutt bindings.
Termite emulates an RS-232 terminal--a simple (AKA "dumb") ASCII
terminal, whereas rxvt has a more complex interface
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 01:09:12PM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 09:32:01AM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 01:17:12PM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 09:23:34PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> >>> Sor
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 09:05:52AM -0700, Felix Finch wrote:
> On 20200409, Derek Martin wrote:
> > And honestly, most mailers have the ability to avoid these attack
> > vectors--they just don't by default, because that's what the average
> > person wants. Mutt users typica
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 12:26:43AM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 03:08:45PM -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 14:43:47 -0400, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
> >> On 2020-04-07 22:18, Derek Martin wrote:
> >>
> >>> Then aga
On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 07:59:45AM -0400, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 09:18:37PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > I've said it before--I too would love a mutt-based (or mutt-similar)
> > GUI mail client. Frankly, no matter how much I love Mutt (and you
> &g
On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 01:17:12PM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 09:23:34PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 12:09:55AM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
> > Sorry, but this is an archaic way of looking at the problem. People
> > have been d
On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 12:09:55AM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
> I'll assume you mean that the email has multiple parts or attachments,
> one (or more) of which is an HTML file and one (or more) of which is an
> image file, and that the HTML file has an "img" element with a "src"
> attribute whose
On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 02:29:02PM -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
> When God invented email, He intended that it be plain text! :)
> As such, rich-text/html/images in email is the spawn of the devil. :) :)
Ignoring the aspect about sky fairies inventing anything, this is
still largely untrue. Sure, in
On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 12:58:21PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> Well I've started trying to diagnose this, I'm less sure now that it
> only happens across the ssh connection, that may be a red herring.
> I've changed the main disk drive on my dekstop system (where mutt
> runs) from a 1TB spinning
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 07:30:16PM +0100, Richard Z wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 09:31:27AM -0500, Mark H. Wood wrote:
>
> > Anyway, a good place to read up on xterm might be
> > https://invisible-island.net/xterm/
> > That version of xterm still gets updates several times a year. xterm
> >
On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 12:21:15PM +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
> Regarding the following, written by "Derek Martin" on 2019-10-31 at 15:39 Uhr
> -0500:
> > And FWIW, I *was* discussing (very limited, completely text-based)
> > support for HTML messages in M
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 10:20:21AM +, John Long wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 15:49:05 -0500
> Derek Martin wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:31:21AM +, John Long wrote:
> > > That doesn't really help. From my point the issue is not only what I
> > &
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:43:07AM +, John Long wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 23:47:38 +1300
> martin f krafft wrote:
>
> > Regarding the following, written by "John Long" on 2019-10-31 at
> > 10:30 Uhr +:
> > >1. Commonly done != standard. There are standards for things like
> > >MIME,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:29:31AM +, John Long wrote:
> > I don’t think this is about right and wrong, and not only because
> > there is no objectivity. multipart/alternative is an accepted
> > standard, and so is HTML. You might not like how things have
> > developed, and neither do I, but
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:31:21AM +, John Long wrote:
> That doesn't really help. From my point the issue is not only what I
> have to configure or what can be configured, but also how much code is
> behind doing that. Less code is easier to manage than more code. I
> can't see the benefit of
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 07:04:48PM +, John Long wrote:
> > so you cater to people who have no idea, and cannot be bothered.
>
> Which is probably 99.9% of everybody in corp. offices worldwide.
>
> Don't get me wrong, I'm not advocating for HTML support in mutt. HTML
> has absolutely no place
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 10:31:19PM -, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2019-10-29, martin f krafft wrote:
> That's true (as I understood the problem, anyway). Fortunately, I
> never needed to send a signed message with an attachment (or just a
> signed message, AFAIR). Nobody I know would have the
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 11:11:31PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día lunes, octubre 28, 2019 a las 04:50:40p. m. -0500, Derek Martin
> escribió:
>
> > > FWIW, I (as a mutt user for 15++ years) do not need this. Thanks
> >
> > Perhaps not, but the fact that it
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:06:18PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día lunes, octubre 28, 2019 a las 03:59:01p. m. -0500, Derek Martin
> escribió:
>
> > FWIW, my two biggest wishlist items for Mutt are:
> >
> > 1. the ability to create and send at
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 10:02:38AM +0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 11:16:25AM +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
> Native support for multipart/alternative composition isn't in my todo list.
> However, I do have a plan to allow external filter generation of the
> alternative.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 07:29:52PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 01:31:57PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > You're probably better off using (local) IMAP over SSH with your Mutt
> > mailboxes. That is, you can ssh into your mail server and run imapd
> >
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 08:58:06AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> I just tried running mutt 'remotely' by mounting ~/.muttrc and my main
> mail directory ~/Mail using sshfs and running a local copy of mutt.
> This makes handling attachments and HTML E-Mail much faster and easier
> than running mutt
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 06:04:05PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 02:02:15PM +0100, Nuno Silva wrote:
> > On 2019-10-20, Chris Green wrote:
> > Do these systems have apparmor? It seems to be some sort of security
> > tool which restricts access to files and directories based
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 03:00:32AM +0530, Pankaj Jangid wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 01:50:54PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> > If you want to participate in development, then please do so by starting
> > small and showing me I can trust your patches. After you've done that, we
> > can
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 01:47:35AM +0530, Pankaj Jangid wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 03:13:37PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > IMAP is, explicitly, a mail protocol for clients to do the
> > minimal amount of fetching necessary. You can do a full sync on
> > top of it, but that's not what it's
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 10:58:22PM +0530, Pankaj Jangid wrote:
> > > I have configured cache so it doesn't happen everytime with the same
> > > email. My 2nd question is - is there a way to pre-fetch all the
> > > emails in inbox.
> >
> > I don't think so -- not without using something like
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 02:57:20PM -0600, Akkana Peck wrote:
> The only problem with mbsync is that it doesn't have a "daemon
> mode", so I had to write a script that runs it every N seconds.
> But that's a trivial complaint.
There are any number of solutions to this, but... cron? It's probably
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 05:12:08AM +, g...@riseup.net wrote:
> 1. When composing messages, mutt ask To: or recipient adress and
> Subject and then go to editor. How to make mutt ask for From: or
> sender address only and then go to editor?
>
The typical way to do this is with send hooks or
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 07:06:52AM +, Ryan Smith wrote:
> By default, mutt uses local or computer time zone in outgoing email full
> header, Date section.
>
> How to force mutt to use UTC as time zone in all outgoing email headers?
For what it's worth, this is probably mostly pointless.
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 02:48:21PM +0100, tech-lists wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using mutt v.1.12.0 on freebsd-current with gpgme. In my config, mutt will
> verify clearsigned gpg sigs if the public key is on the gpg keyring.
>
> But if the key is unknown, mutt will say the key is unknown, and this is
[Sent before I intended to.]
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 01:53:18AM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> @Derek: I've read your mails in this thread, and I'm in no way
> convinced.
I'd love for you to explain why. Note that Kevin confirmed that my
arguments are technically correct. So despite that I
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 01:53:18AM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> I can only say, Erik wrote the answer I wanted to write.
>
> @Kevin: The new change sounds very promising. Thank you for that
> and all your work!
>
> @Derek: I've read your mails in this thread, and I'm in no way
> convinced.
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 09:31:53AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 05:28:26PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> >Obviously you don't need to listen to me
>
> I do listen to you, Derek. The whole buffer pool migration is a
> result of your recurring prods, a
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 05:20:02PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 11.06.19 12:36, Derek Martin wrote:
> > I hesitate to go far as to say that if you think saving the message
> > first is the right behavior, you are simply wrong... but I'm
> > definitely thinking it.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 01:45:18PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 06:43:25AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> I've pushed a branch up to gitlab, kevin/fcc-before-send. It adds
> $fcc_before_send, default unset.
Obviously you don't need to listen to me, but I do want
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 08:11:33PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > I hesitate to go far as to say that if you think saving the message
> > first is the right behavior, you are simply wrong... but I'm
> > definitely thinking it. =8^)
>
> You might consider it wrong but I do not seem to be the
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:36:00PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> But also, just because the message failed to send, your ideas and the
> impetus for writing them down didn't vanish. Your brain is the
> back-up.
Not only that, but I neglected the fact that if the send fails, the
file yo
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:04:25PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> In the event that send fails, the local copy is essential for a resend
> attempt. No ifs, no buts, no maybes. I'm at a loss to imagine any
> scenario in which mutt should risk inability to write that Fcc, through a
> hang-up or
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:24:11AM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> * Jack M [2019-06-04 10:20 -0500]:
> > On Tue, June 4, 2019 5:30 am, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > > The other one (mail sent, but no local copy)
> >
> > Why would this situation would ever occur?
>
> A power failure at the
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 09:53:58AM +1000, m...@raf.org wrote:
> if you want majordomo, i can send a copy but it's available at:
>
> ftp://ftp.icm.edu.pl/packages/majordomo/Welcome.html
>
> note that it's at least 18 years old and unsupported (but still works).
> it might be a better idea to
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 08:06:04PM +0200, felixs wrote:
> I searched in the documentation of sed (info sed), the bash-hacker's
> wiki (1) and read through the Advanced Bash Scripting Guide, but I
> haven't found the exact use case of redirecting input to all the files
> of a directory.
FWIW,
1 - 100 of 508 matches
Mail list logo
