Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

Hi,     The adoption poll is closed. Authors,     Please submit draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08 as draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-00 with only the filename and date changed.  Issues raised during adoption should be addressed in -01 (including, if you are so inclined, adding an

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

To: NetMod WG Cc: NetMod WG Chairs Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08 Poll ends Nov 1 - sorry about that... On 10/18/2018 9:03 AM, Lou Berger wrote: > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

Suupport Scan the artwork for horizontal tab characters. If any horizontal tab characters appear, either resolve them to space characters or exit, forcing the input provider to convert them to space characters themselves first. Support this only more strongly, e.g. the general

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

On 23/10/2018 19:39, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Kent Watsen wrote: Hi Martin, one quick comment; the header used in the examples in section 8 isn't equal to the header defined in section 5.1 This is intentional. Section 5.1 says: The first line is the following 46-character string

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

Yes/support Cheers, Jeff On Oct 18, 2018, 6:12 AM -0700, Lou Berger , wrote: > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08 a working group > document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or > "no/do not support". If indicating

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

Hi Martin, > one quick comment; the header used in the examples in > section 8 isn't equal to the header defined in section 5.1 This is intentional. Section 5.1 says: The first line is the following 46-character string that MAY be surrounded by any number of printable characters. The

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

mod on behalf of Adrian Farrel Reply-To: "adr...@olddog.co.uk" Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 12:57 PM To: 'Martin Bjorklund' , "lho...@nic.cz" Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08 N

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

that. A > -Original Message- > From: Martin Bjorklund [mailto:m...@tail-f.com] > Sent: 23 October 2018 17:04 > To: lho...@nic.cz > Cc: adr...@olddog.co.uk; netmod@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding- > 08 > > Ladisla

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

> be in scope. > > > > > > > > However, we are all sort of waiting for xml2rfc v3 and pending > > > > completion, > > we > > > > want to move this forward for v2 that is in use today. > > > > > > > > (More

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

or v2 that is in use today. > > > > > > (More than) Happy to come back and revisit this issue when v3 is deployed. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Adrian > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: netmod [mail

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

r v2 that is in use today. > > > > (More than) Happy to come back and revisit this issue when v3 is deployed. > > > > Thanks, > > Adrian > > > > > -Original Message----- > > > From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ladislav Lhotka >

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

.@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ladislav Lhotka > > Sent: 23 October 2018 14:24 > > To: netmod@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding- > > 08 > > > > On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 14:40 +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > Hi, >

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

nal Message- > From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ladislav Lhotka > Sent: 23 October 2018 14:24 > To: netmod@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding- > 08 > > On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 14:40 +0200, Ladis

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 14:40 +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Hi, > > I support the adoption. > > Comments: > > 1. My general feeling is that such technicalities should be handled by >the RFC editor and/or tools rather than YANG module and RFC authors. > > 2. xml2rfc v3 introduced a new

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

Hi, I support the adoption. Comments: 1. My general feeling is that such technicalities should be handled by the RFC editor and/or tools rather than YANG module and RFC authors. 2. xml2rfc v3 introduced a new element, , that is intended for source code inclusion. This document should

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

Hi, I support the adoption of this document, and I intend to help by reviewing it. (one quick comment; the header used in the examples in section 8 isn't equal to the header defined in section 5.1) /martin Lou Berger wrote: > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on making >

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

Yes/support. Bo > -邮件原件- > 发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 > Lou Berger > 发送时间: 2018年10月18日 21:13 > 收件人: NetMod WG > 抄送: NetMod WG Chairs > 主题: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen- > netmod-artwork-folding-08 > >

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll (draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data)

This poll is now closed and the draft is adopted.  As usual, this draft will now be progressed through normal working group process, including addressing issues raised during and after adoption. Authors, Please submit draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data-05.txt with only the date updated

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

Yes/support. BR. Michael -邮件原件- 发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Lou Berger 发送时间: 2018年10月18日 21:04 收件人: NetMod WG 抄送: NetMod WG Chairs 主题: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08 All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-kwatsen

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

Thank you - we will submit it shortly. Looking forward to discussions in Bangkok --- Alex > -Original Message- > From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kent Watsen > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2018 1:43 PM > To: netmod@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [netmod] W

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

drafts for YANG models. Thanks, Adrian -Original Message- From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger Sent: 18 October 2018 14:04 To: NetMod WG Cc: NetMod WG Chairs Subject: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08 All, This is start

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

Of Lou Berger > Sent: 18 October 2018 14:04 > To: NetMod WG > Cc: NetMod WG Chairs > Subject: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08 > > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08 a working gr

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

Message- From: netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen Date: Monday, October 1, 2018 at 2:48 PM To: "netmod@ietf.org" Subject: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 The IETF 102 in-room poll should really good support to adopt this draft, and no objections.

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

Support. > On Oct 18, 2018, at 6:03 AM, Lou Berger wrote: > > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08 a working group > document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or > "no/do not support". If indicating no, please

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

Yes/support. Thanks, Rob On 18/10/2018 14:03, Lou Berger wrote: All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08 a working group document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

Yes/support. -Qin -Original Message- From: Lou Berger Date: Thursday, October 18, 2018 at 9:11 AM To: "netmod@ietf.org" Cc: "netmod-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08 Resent-From: Resent-To: , , Resent-Date: Thursday, October 18, 2018

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

[fixed the date in Lou's message below] No objection. Kent // contributor -Original Message- From: Lou Berger Date: Thursday, October 18, 2018 at 9:11 AM To: "netmod@ietf.org" Cc: "netmod-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

Poll ends Nov 1 - sorry about that... On 10/18/2018 9:03 AM, Lou Berger wrote: All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08 a working group document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no,

[netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08 a working group document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document. If yes, please also feel free to

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

@jacobs-university.de>>, "netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>" mailto:netmod@ietf.org>> Subject: RE: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 Which format to make mandatory sounds like something we can discuss in Bangkok. The reason YANG

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll - instance-data

e Data"? (open to suggestions!) Kent -Original Message- From: netmod on behalf of Balázs Lengyel Date: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 11:06 AM To: Martin Bjorklund Cc: "netmod-cha...@ietf.org" , "netmod@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll - in

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

: Kent Watsen , Ladislav Lhotka , > Andy Bierman , Juergen Schoenwaelder < > j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de>, "netmod@ietf.org" > Subject: RE: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 > > Which format to make mandatory sounds like something we can dis

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

direction. Kent // contributor -Original Message- From: Alexander Clemm Date: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 6:06 PM To: Kent Watsen , Ladislav Lhotka , Andy Bierman , Juergen Schoenwaelder , "netmod@ietf.org" Subject: RE: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-d

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

islav Lhotka > ; Andy Bierman ; Juergen > Schoenwaelder ; netmod@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 > > I agree that a mandatory to implement format is desirable. > > I disagree that YANG-Patch is the right format, for

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll - instance-data

On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 05:07:06PM +, Kent Watsen wrote: > > As co-chair, I have two minds: > > 1) requests a fix and redo the adoption poll > 2) realize that it's a living doc and regardless > how it begins, the WG can sort it out in time. > i.e., we're adopting to work on the

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

-Original Message- From: Alexander Clemm Date: Monday, October 8, 2018 at 5:05 PM To: Ladislav Lhotka , Kent Watsen , Andy Bierman , Juergen Schoenwaelder , "netmod@ietf.org" Subject: RE: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 I would second the request for

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll - instance-data

gyel Date: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 11:06 AM To: Martin Bjorklund Cc: "netmod-cha...@ietf.org" , "netmod@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll - instance-data OK, If the chairs are happy with that, I can update the document before I store it as an official netmod do

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

Support – I’m not sure I saw this on the list. Cheerily, Sue Hares On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 2:48 PM Kent Watsen wrote: The IETF 102 in-room poll should really good support to adopt this draft, and no objections. This email starts an adoption poll for:

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll

Yes - support for this document. Susan Hares -Original Message- From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 7:39 AM To: NetMod WG Cc: NetMod WG Chairs Subject: [netmod] WG adoption poll All, This is start of a two week poll

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll

Support. On 2018-10-08, 7:39 AM, "netmod on behalf of Lou Berger" wrote: All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data-04 a working group document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support".

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll - instance-data

I would expect that there are many other alternative uses of YANG instance data. Some possible alternatives that I can think of: - Storing the configuration of a device at some point in time to a file, e.g. for archive or audit purposes. - Storing diagnostics data, if the format of the data

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll - instance-data

OK, If the chairs are happy with that, I can update the document before I store it as an official netmod document. regards Balazs On 2018. 10. 09. 14:25, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Hi, Balázs Lengyel wrote: Hello Martin, I agree that this document shall be about defining the file format, and

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll - instance-data

Hi, Balázs Lengyel wrote: > Hello Martin, > > I agree that this document shall be about defining the file format, > and server capabilities shall only be a use-case.) > > I already took out a lot of text, that explicitly recommended using > instance data for documenting capabilities. Server

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll - instance-data

Hello Martin, I agree that this document shall be about defining the file format, and server capabilities shall only be a use-case.) I already took out a lot of text, that explicitly recommended using instance data for documenting capabilities. Server capabilities are only mentioned in the

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll

On Tue, 2018-10-09 at 12:19 +0100, Robert Wilton wrote: > +1 to Martin's comments. I think that I made similar comments at the > mic at IETF 102. Me too, it is also recoreded in the minutes. I thought this could be addressed after this draft becomes a WG item. Lada > > I strongly support the

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll

Hi, I still think that this draft should either be split into two, one for specifiying the generic file format (ok with examples), and one for "Documenting Server Capabilities", or the document should just be about the file format (+ *examples*). [The current document mixes the two; it's a bit

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll

I support the adoption. Lada Lou Berger writes: > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data-04 a working group > document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or > "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll - draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data-04

件人: NetMod WG 抄送: NetMod WG Chairs 主题: [netmod] WG adoption poll All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data-04 a working group document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicati

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll

- 发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Lou Berger 发送时间: 2018年10月8日 19:39 收件人: NetMod WG 抄送: NetMod WG Chairs 主题: [netmod] WG adoption poll All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data-04 a working group document. Please send email

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

Support. Cheers, Tianran > -Original Message- > From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kent Watsen > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2018 2:48 AM > To: netmod@ietf.org > Subject: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 > > The

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll

yes/support. Cheers, Tianran > -Original Message- > From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger > Sent: Monday, October 08, 2018 7:39 PM > To: NetMod WG > Cc: NetMod WG Chairs > Subject: [netmod] WG adoption poll > > All, > > Th

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

support. Thanks, - Xufeng On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 2:48 PM Kent Watsen wrote: > The IETF 102 in-room poll should really good support to adopt > this draft, and no objections. > > This email starts an adoption poll for: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 > > Please

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll

yes/support. Thanks, - Xufeng On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 7:39 AM Lou Berger wrote: > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data-04 a working group > document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or > "no/do not support". If

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

gt; To: Kent Watsen ; Andy Bierman > ; Juergen Schoenwaelder university.de>; netmod@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 > > Kent Watsen writes: > > > Sure, one mandatory to implement format, others nice to have. > > Inter

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll

Support --- Alex > -Original Message- > From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger > Sent: Monday, October 08, 2018 4:39 AM > To: NetMod WG > Cc: NetMod WG Chairs > Subject: [netmod] WG adoption poll > > All, > > This is star

[netmod] WG adoption poll

All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data-04 a working group document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document. If yes, please also feel free

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

format? I would think that a diff would provide >> both values, not just a new value. >> >> Kent // contributor >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: netmod on behalf of Ladislav Lhotka >> >> Organization: CZ.NIC >> Date: Th

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

nother, would it make >> sense to define an actual diffing format? I would think that a diff would >> provide both values, not just a new value. >> > >> > Kent // contributor >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message- >> > From:

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

converting one data tree to another, would it make > sense to define an actual diffing format? I would think that a diff would > provide both values, not just a new value. > > > > Kent // contributor > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: netmod

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

On 2018-10-04, 4:22 PM, "netmod on behalf of Juergen Schoenwaelder" wrote: On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 08:09:55PM +, Kent Watsen wrote: > Sure, one mandatory to implement format, others nice to have. > Interoperability good. Agreed. > > But why YANG-patch and not

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 08:09:55PM +, Kent Watsen wrote: > Sure, one mandatory to implement format, others nice to have. > Interoperability good. Agreed. > > But why YANG-patch and not something built for the purpose > (e.g., YANG-diff) that, in particular, provides an actual diff as >

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

8 at 1:11 PM > To: Robert Wilton , "netmod@ietf.org" > Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 > > On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 14:17 +0100, Robert Wilton wrote: > > > > On 04/10/2018 13:51, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On Thu, 2018-

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

To: Robert Wilton , "netmod@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 14:17 +0100, Robert Wilton wrote: > > On 04/10/2018 13:51, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 13:36 +0100, Robert Wilton wrot

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 14:17 +0100, Robert Wilton wrote: > > On 04/10/2018 13:51, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 13:36 +0100, Robert Wilton wrote: > > > On 04/10/2018 11:14, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > > Phil Shafer wrote: > > > > > Bal?zs Lengyel writes: > > > > > >

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 6:44 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Robert Wilton wrote: > > > > > > On 04/10/2018 13:51, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 13:36 +0100, Robert Wilton wrote: > > >> On 04/10/2018 11:14, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > >>> Phil Shafer wrote: > > Bal?zs

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

Robert Wilton wrote: > > > On 04/10/2018 13:51, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 13:36 +0100, Robert Wilton wrote: > >> On 04/10/2018 11:14, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > >>> Phil Shafer wrote: > Bal?zs Lengyel writes: > >

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

On 04/10/2018 13:51, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 13:36 +0100, Robert Wilton wrote: On 04/10/2018 11:14, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Phil Shafer wrote: Bal?zs Lengyel writes: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 [I've moved to a "deep lurker" role here,

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

On 04/10/2018 11:14, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Phil Shafer wrote: Bal?zs Lengyel writes: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 [I've moved to a "deep lurker" role here, but ...] Can we ensure this model contains a "format" leaf in the RPC's input so that future (and

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

Phil Shafer wrote: > Bal?zs Lengyel writes: > >https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 > > [I've moved to a "deep lurker" role here, but ...] > > Can we ensure this model contains a "format" leaf in the RPC's input > so that future (and proprietary) formats can be supported?

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

Bal?zs Lengyel writes: >https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 [I've moved to a "deep lurker" role here, but ...] Can we ensure this model contains a "format" leaf in the RPC's input so that future (and proprietary) formats can be supported? That leaf can be an identityref

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

Support. Balazs On 10/1/2018 8:48 PM, Kent Watsen wrote: The IETF 102 in-room poll should really good support to adopt this draft, and no objections. This email starts an adoption poll for: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 Please indicate your support or

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

Support. Kent // contributor -Original Message- From: Kent Watsen Date: Monday, October 1, 2018 at 2:48 PM To: "netmod@ietf.org" Subject: WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 The IETF 102 in-room poll showed really good support to adopt this draft, and no objections.

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

Support! Important work! Susan Hares From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Tantsura Sent: Monday, October 1, 2018 4:08 PM To: netmod@ietf.org; Kent Watsen Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 Support as co-author

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

r anyone else object? Kent // chair -Original Message- From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" Date: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 at 8:21 AM To: Kent Watsen , "netmod@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

Support As coauthor. -- Thanks, Yingzhen 发件人：Kent Watsen 收件人：netmod@ietf.org, 时间：2018-10-01 14:48:55 主 题：[netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 The IETF 102 in-room poll should really good support to adopt this draft

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

Hi, I support the adoption of this document. /martin Kent Watsen wrote: > The IETF 102 in-room poll should really good support to adopt > this draft, and no objections. > > This email starts an adoption poll for: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 > > Please

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

Support. On 10/1/18, 2:48 PM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen" wrote: The IETF 102 in-room poll should really good support to adopt this draft, and no objections. This email starts an adoption poll for: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

Support. On 01/10/2018 19:48, Kent Watsen wrote: The IETF 102 in-room poll should really good support to adopt this draft, and no objections. This email starts an adoption poll for: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 Please indicate your support or objection to

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

ent Watsen , "netmod@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 Kent, I may have asked this question in Montreal but I don't remember the answer: why is this document in NETMOD and not in NETCONF? Regards, Reshad. On 2018-10-01, 2:48 PM, "netmo

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

Kent, I may have asked this question in Montreal but I don't remember the answer: why is this document in NETMOD and not in NETCONF? Regards, Reshad. On 2018-10-01, 2:48 PM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen" wrote: The IETF 102 in-room poll should really good support to adopt this

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

Support to adopt this draft. -Qin On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 18:48 +, Kent Watsen wrote: > The IETF 102 in-room poll should really good support to adopt this > draft, and no objections. > > This email starts an adoption poll for: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

Support. Lada On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 18:48 +, Kent Watsen wrote: > The IETF 102 in-room poll should really good support to adopt > this draft, and no objections. > > This email starts an adoption poll for: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 > > Please indicate

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

Support as coauthor --- Alex > -Original Message- > From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kent Watsen > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2018 2:48 PM > To: netmod@ietf.org > Subject: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 > > The

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

Support as co-author Cheers, Jeff On Oct 1, 2018, 11:48 AM -0700, Kent Watsen , wrote: > The IETF 102 in-room poll should really good support to adopt > this draft, and no objections. > > This email starts an adoption poll for: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 > >

[netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

The IETF 102 in-room poll should really good support to adopt this draft, and no objections. This email starts an adoption poll for: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 Please indicate your support or objection to the adoption poll. If objecting, please state your

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02

Hi, Andy Bierman wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 7:40 AM joel jaeggli wrote: > > > This is start of a two week poll on making > > draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02 a NetMod working group > > document. > > > > > I think we did this step already. >

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02

On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Anees Shaikh wrote: > I'm afraid I missed the discussion of tags at recent IETF meetings where > this may have been covered. In my read of this draft, I'm still not sure > what the intended use cases are (i.e., is #hashtag ubiquity really the > primary

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02

On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 1:17 PM, joel jaeggli wrote: > On 9/26/18 09:23, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:09 AM Juergen Schoenwaelder > > > > wrote: > > > > > It is even worse than a step backwards. > > The draft specifies a

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02

On 9/26/18 09:23, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:09 AM Juergen Schoenwaelder > > wrote: > > It is even worse than a step backwards. > The draft specifies a lot of details about module tag conformance > that needs to be present

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:09 AM Juergen Schoenwaelder < j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 07:55:44AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 7:40 AM joel jaeggli wrote: > > > > > This is start of a two week poll on making > > >

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 07:55:44AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 7:40 AM joel jaeggli wrote: > > > This is start of a two week poll on making > > draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02 a NetMod working group > > document. > > > > > I think we did this step already. >

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 7:40 AM joel jaeggli wrote: > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02 a NetMod working group > document. > I think we did this step already. https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg20344.html Otherwise how would the

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02

Yes/support. Thanks, Rob On 26/09/2018 15:40, joel jaeggli wrote: This is start of a two week poll on making draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02 a NetMod working group document. You may review at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02 Please send email to the list

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02

Yes/support Thanks, Acee On 9/26/18, 10:41 AM, "netmod on behalf of joel jaeggli" wrote: This is start of a two week poll on making draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02 a NetMod working group document. You may review at:

[netmod] WG adoption poll draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02

This is start of a two week poll on making draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02 a NetMod working group document. You may review at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02 Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please

Re: [netmod] WG: Adoption Poll: draft-bierman-netmod-yang-data-ext-01

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 5:32 AM, Lou Berger wrote: > All, > > The adoption call for this document closed on Feb 8th. > > Authors, > > Please repost your document with only the 'filename' and date updated as > draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext-00. Please discuss on list any

Re: [netmod] WG: Adoption Poll: draft-bierman-netmod-yang-data-ext-01

All,     The adoption call for this document closed on Feb 8th. Authors, Please repost your document with only the 'filename' and date updated as draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext-00. Please discuss on list any comments received during the adoption call and then capture the results of the

Re: [netmod] WG: Adoption Poll: draft-bierman-netmod-yang-data-ext-01

Support. Thanks, - Xufeng > -Original Message- > From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger > Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 8:27 AM > To: NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>; NetMod WG Chairs cha...@ietf.org> > Subject: [netmod] WG: Adop

Re: [netmod] WG: Adoption Poll: draft-bierman-netmod-yang-data-ext-01

I support the adoption. Lada Kent Watsen writes: > support, as a contributor > > this draft is needed to resolve a zerotouch last call issue > > K. > > > > On 25/01/2018 13:26, Lou Berger wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This is the start of a *two* week poll on making >>

Re: [netmod] WG: Adoption Poll: draft-bierman-netmod-yang-data-ext-01

Support. > On Jan 25, 2018, at 5:26 AM, Lou Berger wrote: > > Hi, > > This is the start of a *two* week poll on making > draft-bierman-netmod-yang-data-ext a working group document. Please send > email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If >

  1   2   >