Re: [OMPI packagers] [Open MPI Announce] Open MPI v5.0.2 is available

erely, Leo Fang (Fang Yao-Lung) Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) via ompi-packagers mailto:ompi-packagers@lists.open-mpi.org>> 於 2024年2月8日 週四 下午3:37寫道： https://docs.open-mpi.org/en/v5.0.x/news/news-v5.0.x.html#open-mpi-version-v5-0-2 From: ompi-packagers mailto:ompi-

Re: [OMPI packagers] [Open MPI Announce] Open MPI v5.0.2 is available

https://docs.open-mpi.org/en/v5.0.x/news/news-v5.0.x.html#open-mpi-version-v5-0-2 From: ompi-packagers on behalf of Leo Fang Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2024 8:59 PM To: Packagers for the Open MPI software Subject: Re: [OMPI packagers] [Open MPI Announce]

[OMPI packagers] Fw: Open MPI v5.0.0rc16 available

Packagers: Heads up: this is expected to be the last RC for Open MPI v5.0.0. We expect to release 5.0.0 (final) later this week. From: announce on behalf of Tomislav Janjusic via announce Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 3:24 PM To: annou...@lists.open-mpi.org

Re: [OMPI packagers] Does anyone care about 32-bit Open MPI?

dropped 32bit support I doubt we had any OpenMPI 32bit user. On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 10:13 PM Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) via ompi-packagers wrote: > > I'm bringing this topic back (from nearly two years ago): does anyone care > about 32 bit support for Open MPI >= v5.0.0? > > I ask b

Re: [OMPI packagers] Does anyone care about 32-bit Open MPI?

I'm bringing this topic back (from nearly two years ago): does anyone care about 32 bit support for Open MPI >= v5.0.0? I ask because we disabled 32 bit builds on main and v5.0.x about 2 weeks ago (by making configure fail when it is building in a 32-bit environment). A few days ago, we some

Re: [OMPI packagers] MPI with RoCE

Did you mean to post to this list, or to the general Open MPI users list? See https://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/ompi.php. This list is for packaging issues with Open MPI -- e.g., those who make the Open MPI packages in Linux distros, and other OSs. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com

[OMPI packagers] HTML docs in the upcoming Open MPI v5.0.0 package

Heads up to Open MPI packagers... In the upcoming Open MPI v5.0.0, we will be including self-contained HTML documentation in the distribution tarball. It will be the same content that is available at docs.open-mpi.org, but suitable for viewing in a local / no-internet-required web browser.

[OMPI packagers] Open MPI 5.0.0 documentation: HTML and man pages

Open MPI packagers: Heads up: there will be both HTML docs and nroff man pages included in Open MPI >=v5.0.0 tarballs. Depending on how you package documentation, you may want to install the HTML docs somewhere relevant. Open MPI's configure/make process does not install the HTML docs

[OMPI packagers] Open MPI 5.0.0: drop support for gcc 4.4.7?

All -- Unless someone has a strong reason for keeping support for GCC 4.4.7 (i.e., the default GCC compiler that shipped in RHEL 6), Open MPI is going to drop support for it in v5.0.0. The reason for this is that PRTE and PMIX no longer compile successfully with GCC 4.4.7 (and Open MPI gets a

[OMPI packagers] Fwd: Open MPI State of the Union BOF (webinar)

Open MPI packagers -- I should have thought to forward this before now; sorry! We're having a free Open MPI "State of the Union" webinar today to give a snapshot of where we are and the roadmaps for the various Open MPI release trains. This "State of the Union" presentation is usually given

[OMPI packagers] Fwd: [OMPI devel] Open MPI v5.0.x branch created

FYI. Open MPI v5.0.x is coming! Begin forwarded message: From: Geoffrey Paulsen via devel mailto:de...@lists.open-mpi.org>> Subject: [OMPI devel] Open MPI v5.0.x branch created Date: March 11, 2021 at 1:24:32 PM EST To: de...@lists.open-mpi.org Cc: Geoffrey

[OMPI packagers] Does anyone care about 32-bit Open MPI?

Open MPI packagers -- We're seriously contemplating dropping 32 bit support for Open MPI v5.0 (32-bit support will continue in Open MPI series prior to v5.0.x -- for example, the v4.1.x series will continue to have 32-bit support). Will this be a problem for the downstream Open MPI packagers?

[OMPI packagers] Fwd: [Open MPI Announce] Open MPI v4.1.0 Released

Open MPI packagers: FYI. Begin forwarded message: From: "Jeff Squyres \(jsquyres\) via announce" mailto:annou...@lists.open-mpi.org>> Subject: [Open MPI Announce] Open MPI v4.1.0 Released Date: December 18, 2020 at 6:03:50 PM EST To: Open MPI Announcements mailto:annou...@lists.open-mpi.org>>

[OMPI packagers] Open MPI 4.1.0rc4

We're getting close: 4.1.0rc4 is now available. https://www.open-mpi.org/software/ompi/v4.1/ The list of things left before v4.1.0 is final is getting very, very short. Changes since rc3: - Configury fixes for macOS Big Sur - Minor one-sided RDMA performance improvements - Fix OSHMEM

[OMPI packagers] Open MPI: v5.0 delayed, v4.1 soon

Heads up for packagers: the v5.0.0 release has been delayed. It's taking longer than expected to get master stable -- which has ended up slotting v5.0.0 in to scheduling for later this year, and possibly even 2021. Instead, we're going to release v4.1.0 "soon". v4.1.0 will be branched from

Re: [OMPI packagers] Open MPI v5.0 packaging change: require pandoc

On Apr 14, 2020, at 5:39 PM, Jeff Squyres mailto:jsquy...@cisco.com>> wrote: I should be clear: the build requirements here are ***only if you try to build a git clone***. If you're building from an Open MPI distribution tarball, the man pages will be pre-built and included in the tarball --

Re: [OMPI packagers] New RTE for OMPI v5

Open MPI packagers -- Just to be clear: this is an open question to you for the upcoming Open MPI v5.0.x series. We'd really appreciate your feedback. Thanks! > On Apr 14, 2020, at 12:40 PM, Ralph Castain wrote: > > Just pinging you all to ensure you got this. I need to know if we need

Re: [OMPI packagers] Open MPI v5.0 packaging change: require pandoc

On Apr 14, 2020, at 3:45 PM, Marco Atzeri mailto:marco.atz...@gmail.com>> wrote: very complex https://www.joachim-breitner.de/blog/748-Thoughts_on_bootstrapping_GHC It is one of the cases where a new system will be almost impossible to bootstrap. I saw something similar in GO build system so

Re: [OMPI packagers] Open MPI v5.0 packaging change: require pandoc

On Apr 14, 2020, at 12:23 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote: > >> Open MPI packagers -- >> We would like to require "pandoc" for building Open MPI >=v5.0.x from a git >> clone, at least version v1.12. >> Is this ok with all of you? > > give me time to try build it. > > Currently is not available on

[OMPI packagers] Open MPI v5.0 packaging change: require pandoc

Open MPI packagers -- We would like to require "pandoc" for building Open MPI >=v5.0.x from a git clone, at least version v1.12. Is this ok with all of you? -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com ___ ompi-packagers mailing list

[OMPI packagers] Updates for packagers

Open MPI packagers: I have a few updates for you. 1. As you noticed, we just had releases for Open MPI v4.0.1, v3.0.4, and v3.1.4. 2. For v4.0.1, in addition to the things listed in https://www.mail-archive.com/announce@lists.open-mpi.org//msg00122.html, it is worth noting that we removed the

[OMPI packagers] Unexpected releases: 2.1.5, 3.1.2

Packagers -- Heads up: we just released 2.1.4 on Friday, but unrelated to that release, we found a fairly serious bug in our shared memory plugin (the "vader" BTL). We anticipate doing a 2.1.5 release in the immediate future, and will likely do a 3.1.2 release very shortly as well. Here's the

[OMPI packagers] Open MPI v2.1.4rc1

Open MPI v2.1.4rc1 has been pushed. It is likely going to be the last in the v2.1.x series (since v4.0.0 is now visible on the horizon). It is just a bunch of bug fixes that have accumulated since v2.1.3; nothing huge. We'll encourage users who are still using the v2.1.x series to upgrade to

[OMPI packagers] Symbol versioning (was: Shift focus to external libevent, hwloc, pmix)

On Jul 11, 2018, at 3:56 AM, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > > Also, I'd like to revisit the Symbol versioning feature > (https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/issues/1956). (Splitting this into its own thread) > This was closed due to lack of followup on my part at the time (sorry about > that).

Re: [OMPI packagers] Shift focus to external libevent, hwloc, pmix

On Jul 10, 2018, at 5:11 PM, Geoffrey Paulsen wrote: > >In Open MPI v4.0, one of the changes that we're making is to prefer > external packages in configure versus our internal packages for libevent, > hwloc, and pmix (also see https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/issues/5031). > There are

Re: [OMPI packagers] [OMPI devel] openmpi 3.1.x examples

On Jul 13, 2018, at 4:35 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote: > >> For one. The C++ bindings are no longer part of the standard and they are >> not built by default in v3.1x. They will be removed entirely in Open MPI >> v5.0.0. Hey Marco -- you should probably join our packagers mailing list:

Re: [OMPI packagers] Open MPI packagers email list

Ralph: do you mean to say "Open MPI v4.0.x will be compatible with any PMIx >= v3.0.0"? > On Jul 11, 2018, at 12:02 PM, r...@open-mpi.org wrote: > > Yes - with any OMPI of v3.x and above > >> On Jul 11, 2018, at 3:41 AM, Alastair McKinstry >> wrote: >> >> Hi Jeff >> >> Whats the