[onap-discuss] [modeling] Help on ONAP R2 Data Modeling verification

Hello all We have more than 10-20 companies regularly to talk about ONAP modeling , but unfortunately we have only 2 coders contributing ONAP R2 modeling code contribution. Victor has worked on this more than 1 week, and felt that he can’t do such huge work just by himself, so he has create

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Next week modeling call is cancel due to chinese holiday

Hello all Next Monday and Tuesday are Chinese holiday, so we cancelled Tuesday call, service/resource call will continue on Wednesday and Friday. Fortunately we have two companies are contributing the code for our release 2 modeling DM. I will send the request to LF to cancel it. Thanks DENG

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Request for last call for comment on WAN service proposal

Hi DENG Hui- Do you want the comments on the wiki page or via email. Sorry, it wasn't clear to me. -Jessie On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:57 PM, denghui (L) wrote: > Hello all > > > > Per service call discussion yesterday, this is 2 weeks call for comment on > WAN service

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Request for last call for comment on WAN service proposal

Hello all Per service call discussion yesterday, this is 2 weeks call for comment on WAN service proposal https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/WanService the discussion minutes and slides for related discussions and calls are documented here

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Last call for class vs data type issue

Dear All, Dear Mr. Chairman, Because I have not received any concrete comments on the class vs data type issue either on the wiki or in the call. I would like to request a last call for this issue to make progress. If there’s no comments until next Tuesday, I would like to adopt the proposal

[onap-discuss] [modeling] About this week's resource IM call

Hi All, As suggested in the modeling subcommittee call, I have requested to add resource IM call into the ONAP calendar (shown below). However, as I have sent the invitation of this week’s call before, I would like to use the previous invitation for this week’s meeting, and transfer to the new

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Patterns of translating IM into TOSCA-based DM

Hi all, For your information, there is a new page in the wiki to discuss best practices for translation of IM into the TOSCA-based Internal Data Model for R3. Your feedback and contributions are welcome. Regards,

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Resource IM Discussion Apr 27 - Invitation

resource IM discussion call.\n\nMeeting Information:\nMeeting room: h ttps://zoom.us/j/9117271979\nTime: Friday 9pm~10pm China\, 9am~10am US Eas tern\n\nCurrent Agenda:\n-deprecate legacy HPA related attributes\n\nBR\,\ nXu\n\n SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=zh-CN:[onap-discuss][modeling] ONAP Resource IM

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Cancelation of service discussion call on April 18th

Hi all, The service discussion call today is cancelled due to the conflict to China SDNNFV conference. Please post your contribution to the wiki and we will use email discussion until next week. Thanks, Lingli ___ onap-discuss mailing list

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Resource IM Discussion Apr 20 - Invitation

/DW/Class+vs+Datatype+Categorization if you have any feedback on this issue.)\nIf you have any proposal for the call\, please comment o n https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+R3+Resource+IM+Call+2018-4-20 or s ending emails\, thanks.\n\nBR\,\nXu\n\n SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=zh-CN:[onap-discuss][modeling

[onap-discuss] [modeling] this week modeling call will be cancelled

Hello modelers Lots of people reach me that due to China SDN/NFV conference, we would like to cancel this week regular weekly modeling call 1) For service call, #1 will be started this Friday 2) For resource IM, please help to comment on the link:

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Invite feedback on R3 DM proposal

Hello Modelers, In order to get sufficient discussion in the beginning other than before the deadline, we would like to invite each company to feedback to Anatoly on your view. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Why+does+R3+need+multiple+DMs Please either send your view in this wiki page or send

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Resource Information Model - Class vs Datatype Categorization call for comments

Dear All, Here's a call for comment on the class vs datatype categorization issue of the resource IM. Current resource information model (https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Design+Time+Model+Clean+Version) has all objects categorized as "class". There are comments stating that some of them

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Modeling Guidelines

Joel Halpern of Ericsson is leading the project. I think that suggestions should go to him directly. In the meantime, when we get a chance, some of the members of the IM Guidelines group will post to ONAP some of the more serious problems with the existing IISOMI guidelines. This is why we are

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Modeling Guidelines

If you have any questions or comments regarding MEF's use of modeling guidelines, or modeling techniques, please let me know and I will communicate your request to the MEF committee chairs and the CTO. -Jessie On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:15 PM, John Strassner wrote: >

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Modeling Guidelines

You are correct that it is not an "industry standard" like an IEEE spec. It is an informal agreement by industry players to use the same UML Modeling Guidelines. The ONF, ETSI, and MEF use these guidelines, even though you personally may choose not to do so. On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:42 PM, John

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Modeling Guidelines

Hello Hui and Lingli- I've noticed that the modeling guidelines defined here: https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=16003072 do not specify that we should be following the industry defined UML Modeling Guidelines (IISOMI 514) and Papyrus Guidelines (IISOMI 515) defined here:

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Classes vs. Datatypes

I agree (have not checked every one, but makes sense to me) From: jessie jewitt [mailto:jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2018 2:01 PM To: SCAGGS, KEVIN ; MAYER, ANDREW J Cc: yangxu (H) ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Last call for ONAP NS IM

iscuss@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Last call for ONAP NS IM Hello modelers, According to last Sunday discussions, it seems that NS IM become more stable, here is one week call for ONAP NS IM. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/NetworkService After this call, this version wil

[onap-discuss] [modeling] [so] R2 ONAP MultiVim Plugin

Hi Byung and I have noticed that Cloudify has implemented the enclosed TOSCA concrete node type definitions in R2 SO Multivim plugin for deploying VNF resources on Openstack. The ONAP wiki is here:

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Friday morning modeling workshop venue

Hello all Venue: Intercontinental Los Angeles Downtown, sponsored by Linux Foundation Network Echo Park Meeting Room 5th floor Date: March 30th Time: 8am-1pm Lingli will post agenda later today, Thanks a lot DENG Hui ___ onap-discuss mailing list

[onap-discuss]   [modeling] about the NSD in SDC

add the mail title. 原始邮件 发件人：张茂鹏10030173 收件人：ml6...@intl.att.com <ml6...@intl.att.com>tg8...@intl.att.com <tg8...@intl.att.com> 抄送人：onap-discuss@lists.onap.org <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> 日 期 ：2018年03月29日 13:15 主 题 ：[onap-

[onap-discuss] [modeling]

Hi Michael, Tal NSD definition has been already in the SDC code. Here is the link: https://gerrit.onap.org/r/gitweb?p=sdc.git;a=tree;f=catalog-be/src/main/resources/import/tosca/nfv-types/NSD;h=bf5cabb52dc41025f4708c7c095e304196e7e6a6;hb=HEAD. How to design the NSD as

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Last call for ONAP NS IM

Hello modelers, According to last Sunday discussions, it seems that NS IM become more stable, here is one week call for ONAP NS IM. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/NetworkService After this call, this version will move into the clean version. Thanks a lot DENG Hui

[onap-discuss] [modeling] service modeling discussion minutes for Mar 25 available on the wiki

Hi guys, Thanks for attending the service modeling session as part of ONAP Sunday afternoon modeling session in ONS 2018 (25 March 2018) . The meeting related information including agenda, minutes are

[onap-discuss] [modeling]modeling call this week is cancelled

Hello modelers, This week call is cancelled , thanks DENG Hui ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Modeling spec timeline changed

Hello modelers We had twice presentations from Kevin in Model/Arc about proposing modeling spec coming out early as below link: https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/16003450/ONAP%20Process%20Proposed%20Updates%202018-03-21.pdf?api=v2

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Sunday afternoon modeling session in ONS 2018 @ Sun Mar 25, 2018 1pm - 7pm (PDT) (denghu...@huawei.com)

This is the bridge for remote presenter on Sunday. Thanks DENG Hui BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Microsoft Corporation//Outlook 15.0 MIMEDIR//EN VERSION:2.0 METHOD:REQUEST X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Romance Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16011028T03

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] service modeling discussion call invitation: 9 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Wed, March 21

>; 'Neil Thayer' <neil.tha...@amdocs.com>; pierre.ly...@keysight.com; 'MONTELEONE, CHRISTINA' <cm3...@att.com> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] service modeling discussion call invitation: 9 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Wed, March 21 Hi guys, Thanks for attending the service modeli

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] service modeling discussion call invitation: 9 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Wed, March 21

eisinger; Wojciech Dziunikowski; Vul, Alex; Casem Majd (Cas Majd); HAY, AARON; RICE, CHRISTOPHER; Eli Williams (eliwill); MONTELEONE, CHRISTINA; MAYER, ANDREW J; pierre.ly...@keysight.com; POLSTON, STEVE; Alex Daltrini (adaltrin); Neil Thayer; Karin Arnold; zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn Subject: [onap-discuss]

[onap-discuss] [modeling] service modeling discussion call invitation: 9 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Wed, March 21

: 2018年3月21日 11:30\n To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org <mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> \nCc: 'Rittwik Jana' <rittwik.j...@gmail.com <mailto:rittwik.j...@gmail.com> >\ nSubject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] service modeling discussion call invit ation: 9 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Wed\

[onap-discuss] [modeling] service modeling discussion call invitation: 9 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Wed, March 21

Hi all, Welcome to join us for the service modeling discussion thread next week. Here is the proposed meeting logistics: Start Time: 9 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Wed, March 21 Length: 1 hour Meeting room: https://zoom.us/j/9117271979 Proposed Agenda * Agenda bashing * R2

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Features missing in Onap TOSCA Resource IM/DM

Hi Guys, After looking at onap tosca resource IM(https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Design+Time+Model+Clean+Version) DM(https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Data+Model+align+with+TOSCA+NFV+Profile), it seems to me that several features are missing. I'm asking to add these missing features in our

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] service modeling discussion call invitation: 10 am US eastern (10 pm Beijing) Tue, March 13

Hi guys, Thanks for attending the service modeling call earlier today. The meeting related information including agenda, minutes and recordings are available on the wiki now: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Service+IM+Discusssion+Calls Cheers, Lingli -Original

[onap-discuss] [modeling]Modeling call tomorrow

Reminder, the US entered Daylight Savings Time yesterday. For those outside the US, tomorrow’s modeling call will start one hour earlier. 2100 Beijing time DENG Hui ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #10 invitation

ZID="China Standard Time":20180316T21 LAST-MODIFIED:20180312T095622Z ORGANIZER;CN="yangxu (H)":mailto:yang...@huawei.com PRIORITY:5 SEQUENCE:15 SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=zh-cn:[onap-discuss][modeling] ONAP R2 IM discussion #10 TRANSP:OPAQUE UID:04008200E00074C5B7101A82E008000

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Venue of ONAP modeling Sunday afternoon workshop has been finalized

Hello all As you have already know that, we will have Sunday afternoon and Friday morning two days workshop https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Sunday+afternoon+modeling+session+in+ONS+2018 https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Friday+morning+modeling+session+in+ONS+2018 Please everybody help

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R2 IM to DM design

: jessie jewitt [mailto:jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com] Sent: Friday, March 9, 2018 1:26 AM To: denghui (L) <denghu...@huawei.com> Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc <onap-...@lists.onap.org>; Rittwik Jana <rittwik.j...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R2 IM to DM design

Hello all Currently, only 1,2,3,5 have been take, many thanks to Ericsson/Intel/Huawei we still missing contributor for 4,6,7, R2 DM spec aligned with IM need to be finalized before next Tuesday modeling call. Please help to volunteer Thanks a lot DENG Hui From: denghui (L) Sent: Thursday,

[onap-discuss] [modeling] service modeling discussion call invitation: 10 am US eastern (10 pm Beijing) Tue, March 13

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Microsoft Corporation//Outlook 16.0 MIMEDIR//EN VERSION:2.0 METHOD:REQUEST X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:China Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:STANDARD END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT

[onap-discuss] [modeling] service modeling discussion call invitation: 10 am US eastern (10 pm Beijing) Tue, March 13

Hi all, Welcome to join us for the service modeling discussion thread next week. Here is the proposed meeting logistics: Start Time: 10 am US eastern (10 pm Beijing) Tue, March 13 Length: 1 hour Meeting room: https://zoom.us/j/9117271979 Agenda (TBD) The existing discussion

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R2 IM to DM design

Hello- I don't remember this being an action out of the modelling committee meeting yesterday. How does it compare to the action item from another meeting that Alex, Thinh, Anatoly and myself took to work on the IM to DM model mapping, and the mappings that have already been proposed (and

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R2 IM to DM design

Hello Andrei, It's really hard to keep the synchronization between SDO and OSS, they have different paces, ONAP is working for Release time frame restriction. Thanks a lot DENG Hui From: Andrei Kojukhov [mailto:andrei.kojuk...@amdocs.com] Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2018 8:59 PM To: denghui (L)

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R2 IM to DM design

Hello Deng Hui, Andy, As the topics 1 - 6 are more or less covered (or in the process of finalizing) by the ETSI GS NFV-SOL001 so it would not be a big deal to re-use the TOSCA constructs from there. However the topic # 7 is not covered (and not planned to be covered) by SOL001 so to my

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R2 IM to DM design

Hello all As agreed in modeling subcommittee meeting, we need to update the onap types of the data model to reflect the agreements reached in information model. It's huge work to achieve the goal, in order to accelerate, 7 separate tasks have been created based on the current IM. We encourage

[onap-discuss] [modeling] service modeling discussion call invitation: 8 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Wed, March 7

Hi guys, Thanks for attending the service modeling call earlier today. The meeting related information including agenda, minutes and recordings are available on the wiki now: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Service+IM+Discusssion+Calls Cheers, Lingli

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Resource TOSCA Data model

m:* onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-bounces@ > lists.onap.org] *On Behalf Of *Michela Bevilacqua > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 7, 2018 1:09 AM > *To:* onap-discuss@lists.onap.org > *Subject:* Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Resource TOSCA Data model > > > > Hi, > &g

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Resource TOSCA Data model

Hi Michela From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Michela Bevilacqua Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 1:09 AM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Resource TOSCA Data model Hi, I share some questions

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP modeling session registration in ONS 2017

Hello all As we discussed yesterday modeling call, we create two wiki page for 2 onap modeling session on Sunday afternoon and Friday monning, If you are able to attend, please fill in your info to the registration spreadsheet, really thanks LFN and MEF sponsor them Sunday afternoon:

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Results of the two polls

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of yangxu (H) Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2018 9:56 AM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Results of the two polls Hi All, I was about to mention the results of our two

[onap-discuss] [modeling]

The results of the modeling tool poll regarding GitHub taken here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+Tool+Poll Are 14 people approve the use of GitHub. Nobody is opposed. So we will proceed with the use of GitHub. -Jessie ___ onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Support for HPA in SOL001 mapping

I'm not seeing the support in the SOL001 spec for all the HPA related attributes in the IM that we are specifying here: https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=25436710 For example, in our VirtualCpuDesc class there is an attribute vduCpuRequirements that says gets mapped to

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Identifiers in R2 IM descriptors

As I'm unable to attend the early discussions regarding the R2 IM model, I hope you will please take my feedback into consideration. The ETSI descriptors (classes) that we map into R2 IM descriptor classes all have identifiers, i.e. VNFDesc (vnfdId), VDUDesc (vduId), etc. The ETSI datatypes that

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Resource TOSCA Data model

...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Nguyenphu, Thinh (Nokia - US/Irving) Sent: den 5 mars 2018 22:14 To: jessie jewitt <jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Data model mapping using SOL001 Hi Jessie, Your summary below shows there are

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Data model mapping using SOL001

ted text) are not yet defined. > > > > Perhaps, I can introduce this page at Modeling sub_committee on Tuesday > call. > > > > Thinh > > > > *From:* onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-bounces@ > lists.onap.org] *On Behalf Of *jessie j

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Results of the two polls

Hi All, I was about to mention the results of our two polls but got not enough time to do so. 1) Naming Convention Poll (I also count in two opinions expressed in the comments): Option 1: 16 people, 6 company Option 3: 8 people, 3 company Option 1 takes the lead, and if there’re no

[onap-discuss] [modeling] HPA poll and remaining issues

Hi All, As requested, here’s my summary for the next steps for HPA issue. I’ve created a poll page regarding whether (and how) to put certain attribute into the R2 IM. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/HPA+Attributes+Poll Please add comments or supporting materials to that page as you wish. I

[onap-discuss] [modeling] service modeling discussion call invitation: 8 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Wed, March 7

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Microsoft Corporation//Outlook 16.0 MIMEDIR//EN VERSION:2.0 METHOD:REQUEST X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:China Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:STANDARD END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT

[onap-discuss] [modeling] service modeling discussion call invitation: 8 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Tue, March 6

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Microsoft Corporation//Outlook 16.0 MIMEDIR//EN VERSION:2.0 METHOD:REQUEST X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:China Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:STANDARD END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Data model mapping using SOL001

this page at Modeling sub_committee on Tuesday call. Thinh From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of jessie jewitt Sent: Friday, March 02, 2018 1:20 PM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Data model mapping

[onap-discuss] [modeling] SOL001 DM mapping

This is a resend, as I didn't see the message show up in the modeling discussion. My apology if you have already received it. == This message is particularly directed to Anatoly, Alex, and Thinh, as we have an action item to map ONAP IM

[onap-discuss] [modeling] service modeling discussion call invitation: 8 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Tue, March 6

Hi all, Welcome to join us for reviving the service modeling discussion thread this week. Here is the proposed meeting logistics: Start Time: 8 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Tue, March 6 Length: 1 hour Meeting room: https://zoom.us/j/9117271979 Based on the latest contributions

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #9 invitation

tandard Time":20180305T23 DTSTAMP:20180304T075613Z DTSTART;TZID="China Standard Time":20180305T21 LAST-MODIFIED:20180304T075636Z ORGANIZER;CN="yangxu (H)":mailto:yang...@huawei.com PRIORITY:5 SEQUENCE:12 SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=zh-cn:[onap-dis

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Data model mapping using SOL001

This message is particularly directed to Anatoly, Alex, and Thinh, as we have an action item to map ONAP IM to DM. If one of you could respond, I'd appreciate it. My understanding is that SOL001 is mapping the VNFD model to TOSCA. They indicate they are mapping the ETSI NFV elements listed below

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling]Poll on modeling workshop in ONS 2018

Reminder From: denghui (L) Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 9:33 AM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc Subject: [modeling]Poll on modeling workshop in ONS 2018 Hello all Please cast your vote on the date of workshop for modeling workshop in ONS 2018

[onap-discuss] [modeling] R2 IM Class diagram

Hello- I'm looking for the class diagram that corresponds to the classes defined here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Design+Time+Model+Clean+Version One would think it would be the diagram that is on the ONAP R2+ Resource IM Clean Version wiki page:

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Comparison of R2 proposed IM classes and IFA011

Hi- I'm trying to understand how the IM model proposed for R2 compares to IFA011. When I look on this wiki: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Resource+IM+Discussion+Based+on+IFA011 it looks like the IFA011 model was reviewed and decisions were made. For example, in the VNFD, one decision was

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #8 invitation

IFIED:20180228T192329Z ORGANIZER;CN="yangxu (H)":mailto:yang...@huawei.com PRIORITY:5 SEQUENCE:11 SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=zh-cn:[onap-discuss][modeling] ONAP R2 IM discussion #8 TRANSP:OPAQUE UID:04008200E00074C5B7101A82E00830960AB5A09FD301000 01EA01855AE57B

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Reminder for information model related votes (Naming Convention & Meeting Time)

of the class/attribute) of ETSI names with ONAP ones Option 3: Option 2 + feedback to ETSI about the changes Please help to cast your vote Thanks DENG Hui From: yangxu (H) Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 1:22 AM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-discuss][modeling] Reminder

[onap-discuss] [modeling]Poll on modeling workshop in ONS 2018

Hello all Please cast your vote on the date of workshop for modeling workshop in ONS 2018 https://doodle.com/poll/a95qs5bg5fwmskdg Thanks a lot Deng Hui ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP modeling subcommittee call meeting minutes

Hello all The meeting minutes is here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+sub-committee+meetings copy below I am sending out poll on day of modeling workshop today Best regards, DENG Hui 20180227 Meeting agenda and Minutes Deadline for modeling spec is M3: Mar. 7th Implementation of

[onap-discuss] [modeling] GitHub poll

This is a reminder that the poll regarding use of GitHub with Papyrus will close tomorrow. Here is the link to the poll: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+Tool+Poll Thank you, Jessie ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #7 invitation

IFIED:20180227T193106Z ORGANIZER;CN="yangxu (H)":mailto:yang...@huawei.com PRIORITY:5 SEQUENCE:10 SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=zh-cn:[onap-discuss][modeling] ONAP R2 IM discussion #7 TRANSP:OPAQUE UID:04008200E00074C5B7101A82E00830960AB5A09FD301000 01EA01855AE57BB49839E23

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Reminder for information model related votes (Naming Convention & Meeting Time)

Hello all, There're two votes ongoing related to information model design and the deadline is approaching. If you haven't voted, please see the following wiki pages and provide your opinions. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Naming+Convention+Poll

[onap-discuss] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to ETSI NFV ISG

Hello all Based on email discussion, enclosed draft liaison from modeling subcommittee to ETSI NFV ISG is as the enclosed. Thanks a lot for you review Best regards, DENG Hui <> ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #6 invitation

Time":20180223T23 DTSTAMP:20180222T072749Z DTSTART;TZID="China Standard Time":20180223T21 LAST-MODIFIED:20180222T073031Z ORGANIZER;CN="yangxu (H)":mailto:yang...@huawei.com PRIORITY:5 SEQUENCE:6 SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=zh-cn:[onap-discuss][modeling] ONAP R2 IM d

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Liaison to ETSI

AM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Liaison to ETSI In our modeling meeting last week we discussed making a formal contribution to ETSI. Does ONAP have an official liaison relationship to ETSI? If so, is there a process we follow for making contributions? Thanks

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Liaison to ETSI

In our modeling meeting last week we discussed making a formal contribution to ETSI. Does ONAP have an official liaison relationship to ETSI? If so, is there a process we follow for making contributions? Thanks, Jessie ___ onap-discuss mailing list

[onap-discuss] [Modeling] Poll for use of GitHub

Please vote on the poll regarding the use of GitHub for versioning of Papyrus models. It is located at: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+Tool+Poll The poll closes on 2/28/18. Thank you, Jessie ___ onap-discuss mailing list

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] 20180213 modeling subcommittee Meeting Minutes

hui (L) Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 10:46 PM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-...@lists.onap.org P <onap-...@lists.onap.org> Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] 20180213 modeling subcommittee Meeting Minutes Hello all Modeling subcommittee has been questioned when will our mod

[onap-discuss] [modeling] 20180213 modeling subcommittee Meeting Minutes

Hello all Modeling subcommittee has been questioned when will our modeling DM spec come out, below are our meeting minutes this week. Hi Kenny, We are going to cancel next week modeling subcommittee call due to china new year, thanks a lot for your help

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #5 invitation

Hi All, This is an invitation for the discussion on ONAP release 2 information model. The topic is VduProfile, VirtualNetworkInterface and LogicalNodeData. Start Time: 8 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Tue Length: 1 hour Meeting room: https://zoom.us/j/9117271979 Wish all interested people could

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Meeting notes for ONAP IM discussion call #3 Feb 9th

Hi All, Thanks for joining the call! During this meeting, we finished the discussion on VDU (with a few leftover attributes), SwImageDesc, VirtualComputeDesc, VirtualCpuData/VirtualCpuDesc, VirtualMemoryData/VirtualMemoryDesc, VirtualStorageDesc and LogicalNodeDesc class models, the

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #4 invitation

Hi All, This is an invitation for the discussion on ONAP release 2 information model. The topic is Cpd, ExtCpd, VduCpd and Vdu undecided attributes. Start Time: 7 am US eastern (8 pm Beijing) Mon Length: 2 hour Meeting room: https://zoom.us/j/9117271979 Wish all interested people could join.

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #3 invitation

Hi All, This is an invitation for the discussion on ONAP release 2 information model. The topic is continuing the discussion of VDU model. Start Time: 8 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Fri Length: 1 hour Meeting room: https://zoom.us/j/9117271979 Wish all interested people could join. Best

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Meeting notes for ONAP IM discussion call #2 Feb 8th

Hi All, Thanks for joining the call! During this meeting, we finished the discussion on the VNFD top level model, I’ll try to capture them in the clean version page below: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Design+Time+Model+Clean+Version The discussion on the VDU part has been started and will

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #2 reminder

Hi All, This is a late reminder for today’s discussion on ONAP release 2 information model. The topic is continuing the discussion of VNFD top level (i.e. VNFDesc) and VDU models. Start Time: 7 am US eastern (8 pm Beijing) Thu Length: 2 hour Meeting room: https://zoom.us/j/9117271979 Wish all

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Meeting Notes for ONAP IM discussion call Feb 7th

Hi All, Thanks for joining the call! The information of the inputs can be found in the following wiki pages: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Resource+IM+Discussion+Based+on+IFA011 https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Class%3A+VNFDesc For those who haven’t a chance to join, the summary is that we

[onap-discuss] [Modeling]VDU Solution from ETSI

Hi Anatoly, Since we are talking about the VDU DM, can I suggest the ETSI VDU DM as reference for more discussion. Here is the link on wiki: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Alternative+VDU+design+from+TOSCA Thanks in advance. BR Victor

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Whether How and when we should move to Github for modeling spec update process

Hi Brian Yes, could you kindly help to do it under modeling tools wiki page? Thanks a lot for your help Best regards, DENG Hui From: Brian Hedstrom [mailto:brian.hedst...@oamtechnologies.com] Sent: Friday, February 2, 2018 11:12 PM To: denghui (L) Cc:

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling]Modeling call next week

Hi Kenny From latest program: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/VF2F+Feb.+5-8%2C+2017 We are starting from 9:30am eastern time , which is 10:30pm Beijing time Thanks a lot for your reminder Best regards, DENG Hui From: Kenny Paul [mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Saturday, February 3,

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling]Modeling call next week

Hi Deng, I'll cxl next week's call even though these requests should always be routed throgh the wiki page Meeting Requests, Changes, Hosting & Recording I don’t understand the sentence that follows however. Not sure if this is a

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling]Modeling call next week

Hi Deng Hui, Wed 6:00AM PST clashes with the SDNC weekly call. We should avoid this overlap for next week's vF2F if possible. Thank you Parviz --- PARVIZ YEGANI, PhD Chief SDN/NFV Architect CTO Office, Cloud Network Solutions FutureWei Technologies, Inc. 2330 Central Express Way Santa

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Whether How and when we should move to Github for modeling spec update process

ap.org; onap-...@lists.onap.org P <onap-...@lists.onap.org> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Whether How and when we should move to Github for modeling spec update process Hi Deng, I'm in favor of using Git for model development. Do we want to add a Poll page to the wiki to track participant vot

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Whether How and when we should move to Github for modeling spec update process

Hi Deng, I'm in favor of using Git for model development. Do we want to add a Poll page to the wiki to track participant voting on this topic? Thanks Brian On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 7:31 PM, denghui (L) wrote: > Hello modeling subcommittee, > > > > Many Thanks to Jessie’s

[onap-discuss] [modeling]Modeling call next week

Hello all Our modeling subcommittee call will be cancelled next week due to vf2f, Hi Kenny, could you kindly help to cancel next week call, thanks a lot and we will have our modeling subcommittee session on Wednesday 9am eastern time, 10pm Beijing time. 1) Resource IM Xu Yang 2) Service

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call Feb. 1st meeting notes

Hi, Thank you all for joining the call! Here’s the meeting notes: 1) Focus on the word document for now: - Identify the parts that could be stable before M2 and try to reach consensus - Word doc format: IFA011(ETSI) like format - Process: reach consensus in meeting calls, and then move the

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Whether How and when we should move to Github for modeling spec update process

Hello modeling subcommittee, Many Thanks to Jessie's kind presentation on GitHub for Papyrus model. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+sub-committee+Contributions https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/16003450/GitHub%20for%20Papyrus%20Model.pptx?api=v2 Due to time limitation, we

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion meeting

Michela Bevilacqua <michela.bevilac...@ericsson.com> Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion meeting Xu Yang, Yes, let’s plan on a call to discuss at 8:00am eastern US on Thursday (1 Feb) to discuss Papyrus, using Zoom ID: 9117271979 Best Regards

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion meeting

] Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 7:03 AM To: SCAGGS, KEVIN <ks0...@att.com>; MAYER, ANDREW J <am8...@att.com> Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion meeting Hi Kevin & Andy, I think it’s time to discuss how to start the Papyr

<    1   2   3   4   >