Hi,
Under Linux, when we create .deb files, the download archive name
contains _deb, avoiding confusion. It was not the case for .rpm
rchive type, and lot of people download .rpm and discover later they
need .deb.
Since I don't know whether we can commit or not, I prefered provide a
Hi Mathias,
Le 31 août 11 à 23:48, Mathias Bauer a écrit :
OK, my Windows build was successful.
Great :-)
So obviously the two perl modules that didn't install properly are
not needed for a standard build.
I had to upgrade my Windows set too, including cygwin, and lot of
binaries,
Build failed in autodoc module:
Entering /tmp/apache_oo/ooo/main/autodoc/source/display/html
Making:all_display_html.dpobj
Compiling: autodoc/source/display/html/aryattrs.cxx
Compiling: autodoc/source/display/html/cfrstd.cxx
Compiling: autodoc/source/display/html/chd_udk2.cxx
On 01.09.2011 10:33, Marc-Oliver Straub wrote:
RedHat Enterprise Linux 5.6 64-bit, gcc 4.1.2
../configure --disable-mozilla --without-junit
checking whether to enable RandR support... checking for XRANDR... no
checking X11/extensions/Xrandr.h usability... no
checking
It seems that RHEL5.6 contains a too old version of XRandR:
configure:17552: checking whether to link to Xrender
configure:17560: result: no, dynamically open it
configure:17564: checking which Xrender headers to use
configure:17580: result: internal
configure:17637: checking whether to enable
I moved my site directory tree on ooo-forums.apache.org last night.
(This is the ~80 files that need to be put under svn, and that enable
the site-customised forum configuration to be rebuild by one of the
scripts in site/scripts and the phpBB tarballs that it pulls from the
phpBB
https://blogs.apache.org/roller-ui/authoring/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=apache_openoffice_org_developer_education
Are the homework items correct? Anything else participants should prepare?
Note also I'm framing this as one of a series of Developer Education
Events. We might want to think of
I switched to gcc44, and get the following build error:
Entering /tmp/apache_oo/svn_clean/ooo/main/xml2cmp/source/finder
Compiling: xml2cmp/source/finder/dependy.cxx
/tmp/apache_oo/svn_clean/ooo/main/solver/340/unxlngx6.pro/bin/makedepend: error
while loading shared libraries:
JIRA issue entered:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3905
-Rob
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
Hey, over here (waving arm in the air)!
Yes, I will moderate ooo-users.
Do you need a minimum of three?
It would also be good to have one
Hi Dennis,
On Wednesday, 2011-08-31 18:29:02 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Oh, so it wasn't actually an MS Office file, but a spoof with a .doc filename?
I only vaguely remember, but I think it was that way.
That would definitely be hard to catch. I'm not sure what would cause
it to
Dear OpenOffice.org Developers,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 21 September 2011, 10 am Pacific. The
report
While here,
Can Apache projects rely on Mozilla's nss (MPL)?
I looked for alternatives but I only found the java based
Bouncy Castle:
http://www.bouncycastle.org/
cheers,
Pedro.
--- On Thu, 9/1/11, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
From: Dennis E. Hamilton
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Pedro F. Giffuni giffu...@tutopia.com wrote:
While here,
Can Apache projects rely on Mozilla's nss (MPL)?
See this page on current view from Apache legal:
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
I looked for alternatives but I only found the
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
snip
1) Was something similar every done for OpenOffice.org? Most software
companies are aware of this US export regulation and do
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Danese Cooper dan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
snip
1) Was something similar every done for OpenOffice.org?
On 31 August 2011 23:16, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 31 August 2011 17:06, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
That makes no sense.
I don't agree. There are other copies of the code out there managed
under different licenses and different approaches.
On 8/31/2011 10:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Kay Schenkkay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Andrew--
On 08/31/2011 10:17 AM, Andrew Rist wrote:
This is not related to the DNS transfer. That process has not yet begun,
and appropriate warning will be given when
Anyone is able to join the OOo Community forums, but we also have a
number of closed forums use for internal management of the site. If any
committers would like to have access to these, then just make sure that
they've got an active account on the current production service (not
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Terry Ellison te...@ellisons.org.uk wrote:
Anyone is able to join the OOo Community forums, but we also have a number
of closed forums use for internal management of the site. If any committers
would like to have access to these, then just make sure that
An alternative for patches that one is hesitant/unable to commit is to submit
them with an issue on the now-live issue tracker at
http://issues.apache.org/ooo/
We should be using this bug tracker heavily now. It is the best way to place
material where it will be seen and reviewed without
2011/9/1 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org:
https://blogs.apache.org/roller-ui/authoring/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=apache_openoffice_org_developer_education
how can I login?
thanks in advance
M.
http://www.apache.org/dev/blogs.html describes the
(public) preview url for blog articles.
From: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2011 1:44 PM
Subject: Re: draft blog post on the Linux build education
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Terry Ellison te...@ellisons.org.uk wrote:
Rob,
This was a polite invitation to committers if they wanted to see how the
forums operate. I will take your -1 to mean that you don't want to take me
up on the offer.
Let me be clearer then. The -1 is to your
Hi Rob,
Perhaps you should use the new list for the education event?
Given that we haven't made any release yet I think this would
also serve to feed the user archive with the build instructions.
Just a thought, if this is more of a developer event and/or
you also plan a walkthrough the code
I think you are right. I already have a list where orc...@apache.org is a
moderator, so I will see if I can access the moderator features there.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Eike Rathke [mailto:o...@erack.de]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 08:11
To:
1. The post looks fine.
2. I had to use my author/editor login.
I also can't tell whether it is post-dated. I think that is what puts them
where they can be seen, but not sure.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 01,
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 14:27 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://www.apache.org/dev/blogs.html describes the
(public) preview url for blog articles.
Thanks for the hint, Joe.
If I understood it correctly, this
orcmid@a.o has access to SMTP at smtps://people.apachea.org:465/
Moderators can approve emails from any address, but access to the -log,
-list, and the moderator's version of -help only works from the address
listed as moderator.
Only infra can change the moderator addresses on a list.
Dennis
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Please just do it this way:
http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html
ASF is very clear on what is required for *its* releases and this page
appears to be comprehensive.
The Apache rules break down into reporting
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Please just do it this way:
http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html
That's what I've been looking at from the start. I don't just make
these things up in my sleep.
ASF is very clear on what is required for
OK, Rob, I now understand your point. I will do as you request.
However, it seems to me that by making this request you are creating an
interesting catch-22: I far as I can see there are two facets to this
invitation.
* *Sufficiency*. These forums are closed because this gives the
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Please just do it this way:
http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html
ASF is very clear on what is required for *its*
Dennis,
As we've discussed previously there is almost a religious split
between those that work on forums and those that work on MLs and DLs.
Very few of those involved in the governance of the forums would have
anything to do with DLs/MLs and v.v.
However, what you are really talking about
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Please just do it this way:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Terry Ellison te...@ellisons.org.uk wrote:
OK, Rob, I now understand your point. I will do as you request. However,
it seems to me that by making this request you are creating an interesting
catch-22: I far as I can see there are two facets to this invitation.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
Following the instructions[3], step 1 is to work out whether OOo has
any unusual cryptography beyond ECCN 5D002, which is:
blockquote
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
Following the instructions[3], step 1 is to work out whether OOo
Rob,
I believe Terry is talking about the openoffice.org domain in situ and the
existing OOo forums there. This has nothing to do with anything under Apache
ooo custody at this time, nor does it have anything to do with the test version
he has running in order to learn how to port. It was an
So in general OpenOffice supports encryption and digital signatures
and https/SSL. So we have support for standard algorithms, from
one-way hashes like SHA-1, to block encryption like Blowfish and
AES-256, to public key cryptography per the W3C's XML Digital
Signatures. We also support legacy
Um, so your answer is no?
You do not have any means to deal with that mailing list issue on the live
openoffice.org site?
Any suggestions?
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Terry Ellison [mailto:te...@ellisons.org.uk]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 12:04
To:
2011/8/31 Rob Weir r...@robweir.com:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Manfred A. Reiter ma.rei...@gmail.com
wrote:
2011/8/31 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org:
Something else to think about for the ooo-users list: file attachments.
The experience with the german OOo-users list have shown
that
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Terry Ellison ter...@apache.org wrote:
On 01/09/11 20:14, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Terry Ellison te...@ellisons.org.uk
wrote:
OK, Rob, I now understand your point. I will do as you request.
However,
it seems to me that by making this
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 19:56 +0100, Terry Ellison wrote:
OK, Rob, I now understand your point. I will do as you request.
However, it seems to me that by making this request you are creating an
interesting catch-22: I far as I can see there are two facets to this
invitation.
*
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Let me see if I can help ground this.
Remember, the export could be of code, not just the binaries. So if
we have code that does asymmetrical encryption, then we are exporting
that, even if in the binaries we
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
EAR 740.13(e) should be on
I'm not aware of any legacy encryption in non-ODF formats being supported on
output or input. I must try that.
Rob,
Is it your understanding that http is implemented directly in OpenOffice, or is
the platform provider of http: and https: schemes relied upon? I would be
amazed to learn that
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Let me see if I can help ground this.
Currently, digest algorithms are used for a variety of things. The common
case is SHA1. These are not themselves a concern, as I understand it, since
their function is
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Let me see if I can help ground this.
Remember, the export could be of code, not just the binaries. So if
we have code that does asymmetrical
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 4:00 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 19:56 +0100, Terry Ellison wrote:
OK, Rob, I now understand your point. I will do as you request.
However, it seems to me that by making this request you are creating an
interesting catch-22: I far as I
I am not making a judgment in the case of encryption used as part of
digital-signature PKI-based methods. We need to identify them regardless.
I also don't know if those particular encryptions are done in OpenOffice.org
code or are handled by the platforms at runtime. This might vary
This should really be on its own thread as Terry requested.
In any case, I believe the private forums are for roughly the same reasons that
the PPMC list is private. The administrators address disputes, deal with bad
behavior, etc.
I notice that moderator actions on lists here are not dealt
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I'm not aware of any legacy encryption in non-ODF formats being supported
on output or input. I must try that.
Rob,
Is it your understanding that http is implemented directly in OpenOffice, or
is the
Technically, this was to have been resolved before the code was put up on SVN.
We need to audit specifically for this rather quickly, and including the places
that Rob also identified (import-export filters and http TLS).
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Robert Burrell Donkin
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
This should really be on its own thread as Terry requested.
In any case, I believe the private forums are for roughly the same reasons
that the PPMC list is private. The administrators address disputes, deal
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Manfred A. Reiter ma.rei...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks for the link. it works fine.
blog looks nice and we will what happens next wednesday ;-)
It will be interesting. I just did a fresh install of Ubuntu 11.04,
totally default, virgin, no extra apt-get's. I'll
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Technically, this was to have been resolved before the code was put up on
SVN. We need to audit specifically for this rather quickly, and including
the places that Rob also identified (import-export filters and
Crazy idea. But is it possible at all to cause all posts to private
forums to be echoed to the ooo-private list?
That would address several of my concerns:
1) Guaranteed archiving of these posts in a form that Apache Members
can inspect, if there is ever a future dispute
2) Allows PPMC and
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 16:26 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 4:00 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 19:56 +0100, Terry Ellison wrote:
snip
5) If, hypothetically, you did not have the ability to do peer
reviews and discussion on specific posts by named
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 16:40 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
We have such a method, if it were needed. It is called ooo-private.
If we think that 30 private forums are needed in order to discuss bad
behavior in support posts (3 forums per each of 10 languages)
Come on Rob, people like to work in
Hi,
Le 1 sept. 11 à 23:25, Ariel Constenla-Haile a écrit :
(I just wanted to try with the same options I was building DEV300)
I get the following errors:
* enabling the OpenGL transitions:
Compiling: slideshow/source/engine/OGLTrans/
OGLTrans_TransitionerImpl.cxx
On 1 September 2011 17:27, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
My view is how do we make
FOSS more effective? Partly as a Committer here within the rules associated
with that, partly through my business with the rules and constraints that
has and partly with LibreO, why worry? If you can do
Dennis,
The short answer is IMHO: that's correct -- No. As to the long one: ...
Oracle stopped its major funding of OOo as a mainstream product for
sound commercial reasons -- though this has resulted in personal
consequences for a lot of people who worked on OOo and who no longer
have a
-Original Message-
From: Terry Ellison [mailto:te...@ellisons.org.uk]
Sent: Friday, 2 September 2011 8:02 AM
To: dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Cc: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Administrative controls / management of the mailing lists
Dennis,
The short answer is IMHO:
You two are some of the smartest admins I know, and I've known a few.
With mastery obviously comes strong opinions and equally strong
working habits. This is probably the largest migration effort Apache
has ever done. It is certainly a huge effort from OOo's perspective,
since it is a technical,
On 1 Sep 2011, at 23:02, Terry Ellison wrote:
Dennis,
The short answer is IMHO: that's correct -- No. As to the long one: ...
Oracle stopped its major funding of OOo as a mainstream product for sound
commercial reasons -- though this has resulted in personal consequences for a
lot of
HI--there still seems to be some issues...was OK early this am but
now...VERY slow again. No idea what's going on.
On 09/01/2011 09:30 AM, Andrew Rist wrote:
On 8/31/2011 10:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Kay Schenkkay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Andrew--
The problem isn't Gavin needs to cool off. The problem is Terry and Infra
need to find a way to work together without constantly stepping on each other's
toes.
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:33 -0400, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
You two are some of the smartest admins I know, and I've known a
On 09/01/2011 01:53 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Manfred A. Reiterma.rei...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks for the link. it works fine.
blog looks nice and we will what happens next wednesday ;-)
It will be interesting. I just did a fresh install of Ubuntu 11.04,
totally
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
The problem isn't Gavin needs to cool off. The problem is Terry and Infra
need to find a way to work together without constantly stepping on each
other's toes.
Fnding this way to work together will be easier if we
Some concrete possible ways forward:
* Terry and Infra work together, migration continues, Terry sets up the service
and documents it alongside all the other Infra services.
* Infra assumes responsibility for the services and the migration.
* Infra sets up a VM and tells the PPMC to assume
We have not had the bad-behavior/HR-type problems that would require the PPMC
to have private discussion. I do believe that it is one of the PPMC
responsibilities however. A dispute between users here, or a complaint to the
PPMC about user conduct would likely be handled on ooo-private.
From
From http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html top of page, Overview, second
paragraph:
PMCs considering including cryptographic functionality within their products
or specially designing their products to use other software with cryptographic
functionality should take the following steps *before*
On 9/1/2011 18:52, Rob Weir wrote:
The blog post is up:
https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/apache_openoffice_org_developer_education
Please pass along the info wherever you think it would find interest.
I've stuck it on Twitter, Facebook and Google Plus.
Are there any legacy OOo lists where
This is what we had in http://education.openoffice.org including the
classrooms.
There is also the getting started guide for development. Please have a look
on the wiki.
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project/Effort
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
From http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html top of page, Overview, second
paragraph:
PMCs considering including cryptographic functionality within their products
or specially designing their products to use
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
We have not had the bad-behavior/HR-type problems that would require the PPMC
to have private discussion. I do believe that it is one of the PPMC
responsibilities however. A dispute between users here, or a
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
Looks like LO discussed it briefly [4], but dismissed it under the
misapprehension that since they are not in the US, the regulation is
irrelevant.
I'm confused, how is that a 'misapprehension' exactly ?
Are you concerned
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
Looks like LO discussed it briefly [4], but dismissed it under the
misapprehension that since they are not in the US, the regulation is
irrelevant.
I think Article 32 is of particular interest in the case of OpenOffice.org
distributions in France.
It would appear that compliance with Article 30 is not difficult, since source
code is available in all cases. It would be interesting to find out if the
Apache process for declaring
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I think Article 32 is of particular interest in the case of OpenOffice.org
distributions in France.
It would appear that compliance with Article 30 is not difficult, since
source code is available in all
I'm interested in lending a hand where I can, as I've been able to get OOo
to build on Linux (64bit)..
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@openoffice.orgwrote:
This is what we had in http://education.openoffice.org including the
classrooms.
There is also the getting
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
Looks like LO discussed it briefly [4], but dismissed it under the
misapprehension
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
Looks
Off-topic. Please drop this line of inquiry and
return to the Subject of this thread, which is
about determining required info for the crypto export
declaration.
From: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, September 1,
A little late here, and a trivial observation, but this type of
statement really jerks my chain, because it is so Northern-Hemisphere
specific:
It is September. Time for cooler weather and time to go back to school
(Watching the temperatures and humidity rise inexorably towards summer
makes
Seems to me all that's needed is a regional
qualifier. Blogs aren't written in stone,
it is easy enough to make minor edits to them
post-publication (but do take better advantage
of the pre-publication public url I mentioned
earlier for peer review of articles.)
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 13:24, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Seems to me all that's needed is a regional
qualifier. Blogs aren't written in stone,
it is easy enough to make minor edits to them
post-publication (but do take better advantage
of the pre-publication public url I
Good point Jean! Things need to happen
a bit more deliberately with respect to
posting blog articles next time round,
but as I said it's still not too late
to fix this one. Someone just has to
do it.
From: Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com
To:
2011/9/1 Manfred A. Reiter ma.rei...@gmail.com:
blog looks nice and we will what happens next wednesday
Put the word see into the sentence above, where it belongs ;-)
On 02/09/11 00:46, Shane Curcuru wrote:
Separately from how moderation is done and separately from the issue
that many traditional participants/contributors to a lot of OOo areas
are non-english speakers, I just wanted to mention an additional
factor about mailing list norms at Apache.
For
90 matches
Mail list logo
