Hi,
My review got approved and it was ready to merge but automatic merge failed.
I tried to rebase manually but it still fails.
I'm not very familiar with git, can someone give a hand?
git rebase -i master
error: could not apply db4a3bb... New Cinder volume driver for openvstorage.
When you
2014-12-04 14:01 GMT+01:00 Igor Kalnitsky ikalnit...@mirantis.com:
Ok, guys,
It became obvious that most of us either vote for Pecan or abstain from
voting.
Yes, and it's been 4 days since last message in this thread and no
objections, so it seems
that Pecan in now our framework-of-choice
在 2014年12月08日 16:05, Eduard Matei 写道:
Hi,
My review got approved and it was ready to merge but automatic merge
failed.
I tried to rebase manually but it still fails.
I'm not very familiar with git, can someone give a hand?
git rebase -i master
error: could not apply db4a3bb... New Cinder
Le 07/12/2014 23:27, Dan Smith a écrit :
The argument boils down to there is a communications cost to adding
someone to core, and therefore there is a maximum size before the
communications burden becomes to great.
I'm definitely of the mindset that the core team is something that has a
Hi,
I do the following:
1. Go to master branch. git checkout master
2. Get latest master code: git pull
3. Checkout you code: git checkout yourbranchname
4. Rebase this on the laster master: git rebase -i master
5. Resolve conflicts: git status (this will show conflicts)
6.
Le 08/12/2014 09:13, Eli Qiao a écrit :
在 2014年12月08日 16:05, Eduard Matei 写道:
Hi,
My review got approved and it was ready to merge but automatic merge
failed.
I tried to rebase manually but it still fails.
I'm not very familiar with git, can someone give a hand?
git rebase -i master
Hi,
I would expect that if a core does not understand a piece of code then he/she
would not approve it they can always give a +1 and be honest that it is not
part of the code base that they understand. That is legitimate in such a
complex and large project.
We all make mistakes, it is the only
Thanks guys,
It seems one of the files i was trying to merge was actually removed by
remote (?).
So i removed it locally (git rm ... ) and now rebase worked, but now i had
an extra patchset.
Will this be merged automatically or does it need again reviewers ?
Thanks,
Eduard
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at
Tony Breeds wrote:
[...]
So if that timeline is approximately correct:
- Can we wait this long to fix the bug? As opposed to having it squashed in
Kilo.
- What do we do in nova for the next ~12 months while know there isn't a qemu
to fix this?
- Then once there is a qemu that fixes the
On Monday, 8 December 2014 09:25:43 CEST, Eduard Matei wrote:
So i removed it locally (git rm ... ) and now rebase worked, but now i had
an extra patchset.
Will this be merged automatically or does it need again reviewers ?
Make sure you have a single commit which includes both the `git rm`
Hi,
The whole review process starts again from scratch :). You can feel free to
reach out the guys who originally reviewed and then go from there. Good luck!
Thanks
Gary
From: Eduard Matei
eduard.ma...@cloudfounders.commailto:eduard.ma...@cloudfounders.com
Reply-To: OpenStack List
Yes, and it's been 4 days since last message in this thread and no
objections, so it seems
that Pecan in now our framework-of-choice for Nailgun and future
apps/projects.
We still need some research to do about technical issues and how easy
we can move to Pecan. Thanks to Ryan, we now have
On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 07:56:21AM +1100, Michael Still wrote:
I used Russell's 60 day stats in making this decision. I can't find a
documented historical precedent on what period the stats should be
generated over, however 60 days seems entirely reasonable to me.
2014-12-05 15:41:11.212927
Hello Aleksei,
Thanks for rising it.
I'm ok with it and let me clarify the source code repo state for each to
releases.
1:2014.2-0ubuntu1
tag: 2014.2
fixes in stable/juno
1:2014.2~rc2-0ubuntu1
tag: 2014.2.rc2
fixes in master
1:2014.2~b2-0ubuntu1
tag: 2014.2.b2
fixed in master
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 08:19:54PM +1100, Michael Still wrote:
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote:
On 12/6/14, 7:42 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
-1 on pixelbeat, since he's been active in reviews on
various things AFAICT in the last
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 12:50:37PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote:
In Juno we effectively disabled live snapshots with libvirt due to bug
1334398 [1] failing the gate about 25% of the time.
I was going through the Juno release notes today and saw this as a known
issue, which reminded me of it
On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 04:38:52PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
Hi All,
In the most recent team meeting we briefly discussed: [1] where the
console.log grows indefinitely, eventually causing guest stalls. I mentioned
that I was working on a spec to fix this issue.
My original plan was
I agree that 2 meetings per week will mess things up. 1+ for alternating
meetings.
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Kurt Taylor kurt.r.tay...@gmail.com wrote:
In my opinion, further discussion is needed. The proposal on the table is
to have 2 weekly meetings, one at the existing time of 1800UTC
On 12/07/2014 12:02 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 12/07/2014 04:19 AM, Michael Still wrote:
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote:
On 12/6/14, 7:42 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
-1 on pixelbeat, since he's been active in reviews on
various things
On 8 December 2014 at 10:33, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 04:38:52PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
Hi All,
In the most recent team meeting we briefly discussed: [1] where the
console.log grows indefinitely, eventually causing guest stalls. I mentioned
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 01:20:19PM +, Dave Walker wrote:
On 8 December 2014 at 10:33, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 04:38:52PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
Hi All,
In the most recent team meeting we briefly discussed: [1] where the
console.log
With Kurt Taylor. +1
Very nice idea to start with.
--
Trinath Somanchi - B39208
trinath.soman...@freescale.com | extn: 4048
From: Kurt Taylor [mailto:kurt.r.tay...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 8:39 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions);
Thank you guys for helpful information. Alex, I'll remove v2 schema and add
v2.1 support
2014-12-08 8:01 GMT+03:00 Alex Xu sou...@gmail.com:
I think Chris is on vacation. We move V3 API to V2.1. V2.1 have some
improvement compare to V2. You can find more detail at
Resending this to dev ML as it seems i get quicker response :)
I created a job in Jenkins, added as Build Trigger: Gerrit Event: Patchset
Created, chose as server the configured Gerrit server that was previously
tested, then added the project openstack-dev/sandbox and saved.
I made a change on
From: Sandy Walsh [sandy.wa...@rackspace.com] Monday, December 01, 2014 9:29 AM
From: Duncan Thomas [duncan.tho...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 5:40 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Where should Schema files live?
Duncan Thomas
On Nov 27, 2014
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 08:44:57 +0100
Roman Dobosz roman.dob...@intel.com wrote:
I've just started to work on the topic of detection if host is alive or
not: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/host-health-monitoring
I'll appreciate any comments :)
I've submitted another blueprint,
Hello All,
Can we create multiple resources using a single task, like multiple keypairs or
security-groups or networks etc?
I am trying to extend the existing create_vm workflow, such that it accepts a
list of security groups. In the workflow, before create_vm I am trying to
create the
Feel free to ask any questions you have in #pecanpy on IRC; I can answer a lot
more quickly than researching docs, and if you have a special need, I can
usually accommodate with changes to Pecan (I've done so with several OpenStack
projects in the past).
On 12/08/14 02:10 PM, Nikolay Markov
Hello MagnetoDB!
During the latest meeting [1] of the API Working Group (WG) we noticed that
MagnetoDB made use of the APIImpact flag [2]. That’s excellent and exactly how
we were hoping the use of flag as a discovery mechanism would work!
We were wondering if the MagentoDB team would like to
Hi all!
At the summit during crossproject HA session there were multiple Cinder issues
mentioned. These can be found in this etherpad:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-crossproject-ha-integration
Is there any ongoing effort to fix these issues? Is there an idea how to
approach any of
Hi everyone,
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
meeting on Tuesday December 9th, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting
Meeting agenda available here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is
welcome to to add agenda items)
Everyone
On 04/12/14 13:37, Dan Prince wrote:
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:51 +, Derek Higgins wrote:
A month since my last update, sorry my bad
since the last email we've had 5 incidents causing ci failures
26/11/2014 : Lots of ubuntu jobs failed over 24 hours (maybe half)
- We seem to suffer any
On 08/12/14 09:41, Sushma Korati wrote:
Can we create multiple resources using a single task, like multiple
keypairs or security-groups or networks etc?
Define them in a Heat template and create the Heat stack as a single task.
- ZB
___
Hi all,
The neutron advanced services split is starting today at 9am PDT, as
described here:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/136835/
.. The remove change from neutron can be seen here:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139901/
.. While the new repos are being sorted out, advanced services
Hi, Sushma!
Can we create multiple resources using a single task, like multiple
keypairs or security-groups or networks etc?
Yes, we can. This feature is in the development now and it is considered as
experimental -
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-dataflow-collections
To all neutron cores,
Please do not approve any gerrit reviews for advanced services code for
the next few days. We will post again when those reviews can resume.
Thanks,
Doug
On 12/8/14, 8:49 AM, Doug Wiegley do...@a10networks.com wrote:
Hi all,
The neutron advanced services split is
On 12/03/2014 03:56 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
As of now third-party CI account creation is now self-serve. I think
this makes everybody happy.
What does this mean?
Well for a new third-party account this means you follow the new
process, outlined here:
Hi Team,
We currently have disabled XML support when
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134332/ merged.
I've prepared a followup patch series to entirely remove XML support
[1] soon after we ship K1. I've marked it as WIP for now though all
tests are working fine.
Looking forward to your
For the next few weeks, we'll be tackling L3 agent restructuring [1]
in earnest. This will require some heavy lifting, especially
initially, in the l3_agent.py file. Because of this, I'd like to ask
that we not approve any non-critical changes to the L3 agent that are
unrelated to this
Thanks for joining our team meeting today!
* Meeting minutes:
*http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2014/mistral.2014-12-08-16.04.log.html
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2014/mistral.2014-12-08-16.04.log.html*
* Meeting log:
On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 14:07 +0800, Eli Qiao wrote:
I wonder if we can use body in delete, currently , there isn't any
case used in v2/v3 api.
No, many frameworks raise an error if you try to include a body with a
DELETE request.
--
Kevin L. Mitchell kevin.mitch...@rackspace.com
Rackspace
From: Sandy Walsh [sandy.wa...@rackspace.com] Monday, December 01, 2014 9:29
AM
From: Duncan Thomas [duncan.tho...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 5:40 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Where should Schema files live?
Duncan Thomas
On
Copying the operators list here to gain additional visibility for trunk
chasers.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Doug Wiegley do...@a10networks.com wrote:
To all neutron cores,
Please do not approve any gerrit reviews for advanced services code for
the next few days. We will post again
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
Now that we're in the thick of working hard on Kilo deliverables, I'd
like to make some changes to the neutron core team. Reviews are the
most important part of being a core reviewer, so we need to ensure
cores are doing
On 12/08/2014 09:33 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 12/03/2014 03:56 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
As of now third-party CI account creation is now self-serve. I think
this makes everybody happy.
What does this mean?
Well for a new third-party account this means you follow the new
process, outlined here:
Way to go Kevin and Henry!
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL …..…. p...@cisco.com
IRC ……..… pc_m (irc.freenode.com)
TW ………... @pmichali
GPG Key … 4525ECC253E31A83
Fingerprint .. 307A 96BB 1A4C D2C7 931D 8D2D 4525 ECC2 53E3 1A83
On Dec 8, 2014, at 11:02 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
Isn't this what the API repos are for? Should EG the Keystone schemes
be served from
https://github.com/openstack/identity-api/
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Keystone also has API documentation in the keystone-spec repo [1], which
went in with [2] and [3].
[1] https://github.com/openstack/keystone-specs/tree/master/api
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/128712/
[3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130577/
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Adam Young
On 12/03/2014 04:00 AM, Tony Breeds wrote:
Hi All,
I'd like to accomplish 2 things with this message:
1) Unblock (one way or another) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/123957
2) Create some form of consensus on when it's okay to add temporary code to
nova to work around bugs in external
Folks, not only is today Spec Proposal Deadline (SPD), I also made it
clear out all old specs day. I went in and abandoned all specs which were
still out there against Juno. If your spec was abandoned and you were
miraculously going to propose a new version today during SPD, please do so.
As we’ve discussed a few times, we want to isolate applications from the
configuration options defined by libraries. One way we have of doing that is
the ConfigFilter class in oslo.config. When a regular ConfigOpts instance is
wrapped with a filter, a library can register new options on the
On 2014-12-08 11:45:36 +0100 (+0100), Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
As Dan Berrangé noted, it's nearly impossible to reproduce this issue
independently outside of OpenStack Gating environment. I brought this up
at the recently concluded KVM Forum earlier this October. To debug this
any further, one
On Dec 7, 2014, at 10:51 AM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote:
Hi Kyle,
I am not missing the point. I understand the proposal. I just think that it
has some shortcomings (unless I misunderstand, which will certainly not be
the first time and most definitely not the last). The thinning
On Dec 8, 2014, at 13:12, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
I'm dubious of this as it basically says we know this breaks
sometimes, so we're going to stop testing that it works at all and
possibly let it get even more broken, but you should be safe to rely
on it anyway.
+1, it seems
Just a reminder that registration for the Nova mid-cycle is now open.
We're currently 50% sold, so early signup will help us work out if
we need to add more seats or not.
https://www.eventbrite.com.au/e/openstack-nova-kilo-mid-cycle-developer-meetup-tickets-14767182039
Thanks,
Michael
On Thu,
On 08/12/14 07:00, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote:
Hi Zane Michael,
Please have a look @
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/execution-stream-and-aggregator-based-convergence
Updated with a combined approach which does not require persisting graph and
backup stack removal.
Well, we still have to
cinder service-list will show all the backends Cinder knows about and
their status.
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 2:52 AM, Pradip Mukhopadhyay
pradip.inte...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to find out/list down the backends discovered for Cinder?
There is, I guess, no API for get the list of
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 5:35 AM, Pradip Mukhopadhyay
pradip.inte...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks!
One more question.
Is there any equivalent API to add keys to the volume-type? I understand we
have APIs for creating volume-type? But how about adding key-value pair (say
I want to add-key to the
I'd like to raise this topic for a wider discussion outside of the hallway
track and code reviews, where it has thus far mostly remained.
In previous discussions, my understanding has been that the Fuel team
sought to use Ironic to manage pets rather than cattle - and doing so
required extending
So... I should probably note that I see the case where a user actually
shares object as being the exception. I expect that 90% of deployments will
never need to share objects, except for a few cases-- those cases (of 1:N)
relationships are:
* Loadbalancers must be able to have many Listeners
*
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Dulko, Michal michal.du...@intel.com wrote:
Hi all!
At the summit during crossproject HA session there were multiple Cinder
issues mentioned. These can be found in this etherpad:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-crossproject-ha-integration
Is there
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 09:12:24PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2014-12-08 11:45:36 +0100 (+0100), Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
As Dan Berrangé noted, it's nearly impossible to reproduce this issue
independently outside of OpenStack Gating environment. I brought this up
at the recently
The Ecosystem and Collateral team of the Telco Work Group is meeting on Tuesday
12/9 at 8:00 Pacific Time.
If you're interested in collaborating to accelerate Telco adoption of OpenStack
through ecosystem engagements and development of collateral (case studies,
reference architectures, etc),
As a quick note, the OpenStack Identity Program was not renamed to AAA (based
upon the discussion with the TC) but increased scope to adopt Audit on top of
the already included scope of Authorization and Authentication.
Cheers,
Morgan
--
Morgan Fainberg
On December 8, 2014 at 5:05:51 PM,
Hi Sushma,
Did you explore Heat templates? As Zane mentioned you can do this via Heat
template without writing any workflows.
Do you have any specific use cases which you can't solve with Heat template?
Create VM workflow was a demo example. Mistral potentially can be used by
Heat or other
Not too long ago projects added a maximum complexity check to tox.ini, for
example keystone has max-complexity=24. Seemed like a good idea at the
time, but in a recent attempt to lower the maximum complexity check in
keystone[1][2], I found that the maximum complexity check can actually lead
to
For what it's worth, I know that the Octavia project will need something
which can do more advanced layer-3 networking in order to deliver and
ACTIVE-ACTIVE topology of load balancing VMs / containers / machines.
That's still a down the road feature for us, but it would be great to be
able to do
Renat,
On sending events to an exchange, I mean an exchange on the transport
(i.e. rabbitMQ exchange
https://www.rabbitmq.com/tutorials/amqp-concepts.html). On implementation
we can probably explore the notification feature in oslo.messaging. But on
second thought, this would limit the
Both “delete” and “force-delete” did not work for me; they failed to remove the
VM.
Danny
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 21:17:30 +0530
From: foss geek thefossg...@gmail.commailto:thefossg...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Hi all, I tried to deploy zeromq by devstack and it definitely failed
with lots of problems, like dependencies, topics, matchmaker setup, etc.
I've already registered a blueprint for devstack-zeromq [1].
Besides, I suggest to build a wiki page in order to trace all the
workitems related with
Meeting on #openstack-meeting at 1500 UTC (8:00AM MST)
1) Status on cleanup work -
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Gantt/kilo
--
Don Dugger
Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
___
OpenStack-dev
Hello All,
Can we create multiple resources using a single task, like multiple keypairs or
security-groups or networks etc?
I am trying to extend the existing create_vm workflow, such that it accepts a
list of security groups. In the workflow, before create_vm I am trying to
create the
Stephen,
Interesting to know what is “ACTIVE-ACTIVE topology of load balancing VMs”.
What is the scenario is it Service-VM (of NFV) or Tennant VM ?
Curious to know the background of this thoughts .
keshava
From: Stephen Balukoff [mailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014
hi,
here's a blueprint to make OVS agent use Ryu to talk with OVS.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ovs-ofctl-to-python
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/138980/ (kilo spec)
given that ML2/OVS is one of the most popular plugins and the proposal
has a few possible
Hi,
Thank you guys.
Yes I am able to do this with heat, but I faced issues while trying the same
with mistral.
As suggested will try with the latest mistral branch. Thank you once again.
Regards,
Sushma
From: Georgy Okrokvertskhov
Congratulation Kevin and Henry ☺
--
Trinath Somanchi - B39208
trinath.soman...@freescale.com | extn: 4048
From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mest...@mestery.com]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 11:32 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
Kevin, thanks for the info! I agree with you. RFC is the authority. use
payload in the DELETE isn't good way.
2014-12-09 7:58 GMT+08:00 Kevin L. Mitchell kevin.mitch...@rackspace.com:
On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 07:38 +0800, Alex Xu wrote:
Not sure all, nova is limited
at
Hello, all
I'm trying to install and configure Ironic service, something confused me.
I create two neutron networks, public network and private network.
Private network is used to deploy physical machines
Public network is used to provide floating ip.
(1) Private network type can be VLAN or
Hi all,
So, I have set up a devstack ironic setup for baremetal deployment. I
have been able to deploy a baremetal node successfully using
pxe_ipmitool driver. Now, I am trying to boot a server where I already
have a bootloader i.e. I don't need pxelinux to go and fetch kernel and
initrd images
Congrats Kevin and Henry ☺.
From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mest...@mestery.com]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 11:32 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Changes to the core team
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Kyle Mestery
Hi,
I agree that the most important thing is to conclude how status properties are
being managed and handled so it will remain consistent as we move along.
I am fine with starting with a simple model and expending as need to be.
The L7 implementation is ready waiting for the rest of the model to
Renat,
Is there any reason why Mistral do not pass action context such as workflow
ID, execution ID, task ID, and etc to all of the action executions? I
think it makes a lot of sense for that information to be made available by
default. The action can then decide what to do with the
82 matches
Mail list logo
