Although we are past the non-priority deadline, I have been encouraged
to request this late exception for Project Calico's spec and code adding
VIF_TYPE_TAP to Nova.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130732/ (spec)
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/146914/ (code)
Why might you consider this?
- It
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 04:19:39PM +0100, Markus Zoeller wrote:
Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui sahid.ferdja...@redhat.com wrote on 02/23/2015
11:13:12 AM:
From: Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui sahid.ferdja...@redhat.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
I’m writing a plan/script to benchmark OVS+OF(CT) vs OVS+LB+iptables+ipsets,
so we can make sure there’s a real difference before jumping into any
OpenFlow security group filters when we have connection tracking in OVS.
The plan is to keep all of it in a single multicore host, and make all the
Hi, stackers!
As was suggested in topic [1], using an HTTP header was a good solution for
communicating common/standardized OpenStack API error codes.
So I’d like to begin working on a common library, which will collect all
openstack HTTP API errors, and assign them string error codes. My
On 25/02/15 11:51, Radoslav Gerganov wrote:
On 02/23/2015 03:18 PM, Matthew Booth wrote:
On 23/02/15 12:13, Gary Kotton wrote:
On 2/23/15, 2:05 PM, Matthew Booth mbo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 20/02/15 11:48, Matthew Booth wrote:
Gary Kotton came across a doozy of a bug recently:
Thanks for putting this all together, Salvatore.
I just want to comment on this suggestion:
1) Move the allocation logic out of the driver, thus making IPAM an
independent service. The API workers will then communicate with the IPAM
service through a message bus, where IP allocation requests
Excerpts from Victor Stinner's message of 2015-02-25 02:12:05 -0800:
Hi,
I also just put up another proposal to consider:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/156711/
Sew over eventlet + patching with threads
My asyncio spec is unclear about WSGI, I just wrote
The spec doesn't change
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:46:05AM +, Neil Jerram wrote:
Although we are past the non-priority deadline, I have been encouraged
to request this late exception for Project Calico's spec and code adding
VIF_TYPE_TAP to Nova.
I'm afraid you're also past the freeze exception request deadline.
On 2015-02-25 17:02:34 +0530 (+0530), Deepak Shetty wrote:
[...]
Run 2) We removed glusterfs backend, so Cinder was configured with
the default storage backend i.e. LVM. We re-created the OOM here
too
So that proves that glusterfs doesn't cause it, as its happening
without glusterfs too.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Miguel Ángel Ajo majop...@redhat.com
wrote:
I’m writing a plan/script to benchmark OVS+OF(CT) vs
OVS+LB+iptables+ipsets,
so we can make sure there’s a real difference before jumping into any
OpenFlow security group filters when we have connection tracking in
Hi Michal,
1. Need of distributed lock to avoid same task being resumed by two instances
of a service. Do we need tooz to do that or is there any other solution?
Tooz library is already being used in ceilometer to manage group membership.
Excerpts from Salvatore Orlando's message of 2015-02-23 04:07:38 -0800:
Lazy-Stacker summary:
I am doing some work on Neutron IPAM code for IP Allocation, and I need to
found whether it's better to use db locking queries (SELECT ... FOR UPDATE)
or some sort of non-blocking algorithm.
Some
On 02/25/2015 03:16 AM, Ajay Kalambur (akalambu) wrote:
Hi
I am trying to just get started with openstack commits and wanted to
start by fixing some documentation bugs. I assigned 3 bugs which seem to
be in the same file/area
Welcome!
Let's discuss this on the openstack-docs mailing list,
Hi,
There is an issue with the statistics reported when a nova compute driver has
shared storage attached. That is, there may be more than one compute node
reporting on the shared storage. A patch has been posted -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/155184. The direction here was to add a extra
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Miguel Ángel Ajo majop...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 de February de 2015 at 15:38, Kyle Mestery wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Miguel Ángel Ajo majop...@redhat.com
wrote:
I’m writing a plan/script to benchmark OVS+OF(CT) vs
On 02/25/2015 08:52 AM, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote:
I’m writing a plan/script to benchmark OVS+OF(CT) vs OVS+LB+iptables+ipsets,
so we can make sure there’s a real difference before jumping into any
OpenFlow security group filters when we have connection tracking in OVS.
The plan is to keep all
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2015-02-25 17:02:34 +0530 (+0530), Deepak Shetty wrote:
[...]
Run 2) We removed glusterfs backend, so Cinder was configured with
the default storage backend i.e. LVM. We re-created the OOM here
too
So that
Thanks Clint.
I think you are bringing an interesting and disruptive perspective into
this discussion.
Disruptive because one thing that has not been considered so far in this
thread is that perhaps we don't need at all to leverage multi-master
capabilities for write operations.
More comments
On 25 February 2015 at 13:50, Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Thanks for putting this all together, Salvatore.
I just want to comment on this suggestion:
1) Move the allocation logic out of the driver, thus making IPAM an
independent service. The API workers will then
jOn Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote:
Lazy-Stacker summary:
I am doing some work on Neutron IPAM code for IP Allocation, and I need to
found whether it's better to use db locking queries (SELECT ... FOR UPDATE)
or some sort of non-blocking algorithm.
Hi Robert,
I'm really glad I had a chance to interact with you. Thanks for everything;
I'm hopeful that we'll see you back.
Ironic still has lots of life, so I guess life goes on without lifeless,
but I'll miss you still. ;)
--ruby
On 25 February 2015 at 16:52, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote:
jOn Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com
wrote:
Lazy-Stacker summary:
I am doing some work on Neutron IPAM code for IP Allocation, and I need
to
found whether it's better to use db locking
Hi Eugeniya,
Please have a look on the discussion under tag [log]. We’ve been discussing
around this topic (bit wider, not limiting to API errors) quite regular since
Paris Summit and we should have X-project specs for review quite soon after the
Ops meetup. The workgroup meetings will start
On 02/25/2015 05:26 PM, Ruby Loo wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering what people thought about patches that only fix
grammatical issues or misspellings in comments in our code.
I can't believe I'm sending out this email, but as a group, I'd like it
if we had a similar understanding so that we treat
Hi Tim, All,
1) Step 3: The VM-placement engine is also a datalog engine . Right?
When policies are delegated:
when policies are inserted? When the VM-placement engine has already registered
itself all policies are given to it?
In our example, this would mean the domain-specific
From previous discussion, it appeared the proposer really felt this needed
to be a core neutron aspect.
Where by core they meant both be part of the core API and part of
openstack/neutron.
On the other hand, we also agreed that the best way forward was to develop
a service plugin which in a way
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015, at 09:33 AM, Eugeniya Kudryashova wrote:
Hi, stackers!
As was suggested in topic [1], using an HTTP header was a good solution
for
communicating common/standardized OpenStack API error codes.
So I’d like to begin working on a common library, which will collect all
Ruby Loo said on Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:26:56AM -0500:
I was wondering what people thought about patches that only fix grammatical
issues or misspellings in comments in our code.
For my money, a patch fixing nits has value but only if it fixes a few.
If it's a follow-up patch it should fix all
On 2/25/15, 10:52 AM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote:
Wondering if Kilo should just focus on creating the interface which
will allow us to create multiple implementations and swap them out
during the Liberty development cycle. Hopefully, this could include
even something like your
The Oslo team is thrilled to announce the release of:
oslo.messaging 1.7.0: Oslo Messaging API
For more details, please see the git log history below and:
http://launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+milestone/1.7.0
Please report issues through launchpad:
Hi,
I was wondering what people thought about patches that only fix grammatical
issues or misspellings in comments in our code.
I can't believe I'm sending out this email, but as a group, I'd like it if
we had a similar understanding so that we treat all patches in a similar
(dare I say it,
On 02/25/2015 05:52 AM, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote:
I’m writing a plan/script to benchmark OVS+OF(CT) vs
OVS+LB+iptables+ipsets,
so we can make sure there’s a real difference before jumping into any
OpenFlow security group filters when we have connection tracking in OVS.
The plan is to keep all of
[Parse the subject as new-meeting time, as there is no old meeting time...]
OpenStackClient will start holding periodic development team meetings on
Thursday Feb 26 at 18:00 UTC in Freenode's #openstack-meeting channel. One
of the first things I want to cover is timing and frequency of these
On 26 February 2015 at 08:54, melanie witt melwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 25, 2015, at 10:51, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there anybody who'd like to step forward in defence of this rule and
explain why it is an improvement? I don't discount for a moment the
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
On 26 February 2015 at 08:54, melanie witt melwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 25, 2015, at 10:51, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there anybody who'd like to step forward in defence of this
The fact that a system doesn't use a neutron agent is not a good
justification for monolithic vs driver. The VLAN drivers co-exist with OVS
just fine when using VLAN encapsulation even though some are agent-less.
There is a missing way to coordinate connectivity with tunnel networks
across
During yesterday’s cross-project meeting [1], we discussed the Eventlet Best
Practices” spec [2] started by bnemec. The discussion of that spec revolved
around the question of whether our cross-project specs repository is the right
place for this type of document that isn’t a “plan” for a
Hi, fuelers,
As you may know, we have a rich and complex network_transformations section
in astute.yaml. We use it to describe which OVS/Linux network primitives
should be created and how they should be connected together. This section
is used by l23network Puppet module during the deployment
Yeah, it seems ML2 at the least should save you a lot of boilerplate.
On Feb 25, 2015 2:32 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/24/2015 05:38 PM, Kevin Benton wrote:
OVN implementing it's own control plane isn't a good reason to make it a
monolithic plugin. Many of the ML2
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
So a review [1] was recently submitted to cinder to fix up all of the H302
violations, and turn on the automated check for them. This is certainly a
reasonable suggestion given the number of manual reviews that
Thanks for that, Joe. I'd say the cons miss 'It looks ugly in places'.
On 25 February 2015 at 20:54, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
So a review [1] was recently submitted to cinder to fix up all of
On Feb 25, 2015, at 10:51, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there anybody who'd like to step forward in defence of this rule and
explain why it is an improvement? I don't discount for a moment the
possibility I'm missing something, and welcome the education in that case
A
Hi,
The RFC2544 with near zero packet loss is a pretty standard performance
benchmark. It is also used in the OPNFV project (
https://wiki.opnfv.org/characterize_vswitch_performance_for_telco_nfv_use_cases
).
Does this mean that OpenStack will have stateful firewalls (or security
groups)? Any
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2015-02-24 10:00:51 -0800 (-0800), Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
[...]
Recently, I have spent a lot more time waiting on reviews than I
have spent writing the actual code.
That's awesome, assuming what you mean here is that you've
Hi
So a review [1] was recently submitted to cinder to fix up all of the H302
violations, and turn on the automated check for them. This is certainly a
reasonable suggestion given the number of manual reviews that -1 for this
issue, however I'm far from convinced it actually makes the code more
Not sure where it disappeared, but there are none of the API pages for
VPNaaS exist. This was added some time ago (I think it was review 41702
back in 9/2013).
Mentioned to Edgar, but wanted to let the community know...
PCM (Paul Michali)
IRC pc_m (irc.freenode.com)
Twitter...
\o/
I'll be there! Thanks for organizing it all Dean.
Steve
Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote on 02/25/2015 12:19:38 PM:
From: Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 02/25/2015 12:32 PM
Subject: [openstack-dev]
As you can see, netconn-api has gone into the Openstack-attic.
A few months ago, all neutron API reference docs were moved into
neutron-specs (similar things happened to other projects).
The new home of the VPN API spec is [1]
Salvatore
[1]
Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui sahid.ferdja...@redhat.com wrote on 02/25/2015
12:58:30 PM:
[...]
So we probably have a bug here, can you at least refer it in launchpad
? We need to see if the problem comes from the code in Nova or a bad
interpretation of the behavior of libvirt or a bug in
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015, at 12:36 PM, Jay Faulkner wrote:
On Feb 25, 2015, at 10:26 AM, Ruby Loo rlooya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering what people thought about patches that only fix grammatical
issues or misspellings in comments in our code.
I can't believe I'm
Ditto!
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015, at 01:35 PM, Steve Martinelli wrote:
\o/
I'll be there! Thanks for organizing it all Dean.
Steve
Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote on 02/25/2015 12:19:38 PM:
From: Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote on 25/02/2015 06:46:13 AM:
On 24/02/15 19:27, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:05:17PM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
[...]
I'm not familiar with how the translations works, but if they are
waiting until
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 3:48 AM, Matthew Booth mbo...@redhat.com wrote:
Gary Kotton came across a doozy of a bug recently:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1419785
In short, when you start a Nova compute, it will query the driver for
instances and compare that against the expected host
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
During yesterday’s cross-project meeting [1], we discussed the Eventlet
Best Practices” spec [2] started by bnemec. The discussion of that spec
revolved around the question of whether our cross-project specs
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
A few inline comments and a general point
How do we handle scenarios like volumes when we have a per-component
janitor rather than a single co-ordinator ?
To be clean,
1. nova should shutdown the instance
2. nova should
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2015-02-24 10:00:51 -0800 (-0800), Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
[...]
Recently, I have spent a lot more time waiting on reviews than I
have spent writing the actual
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sqlalchemy-migrate/0.9.5
Changes:
mriedem@ubuntu:~/git/sqlalchemy-migrate$ git log --oneline --no-merges
0.9.4..0.9.5
5feeaba Don't run the test if _setup() fails
c8c5c4b Correcting minor typo
9d212e6 Fix .gitignore for .tox and .testrepository
ae64d82 allow
Excerpts from Duncan Thomas's message of 2015-02-25 10:51:00 -0800:
Hi
So a review [1] was recently submitted to cinder to fix up all of the H302
violations, and turn on the automated check for them. This is certainly a
reasonable suggestion given the number of manual reviews that -1 for
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015, at 02:59 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 26 February 2015 at 08:54, melanie witt melwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 25, 2015, at 10:51, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there anybody who'd like to step forward in defence of this rule and
explain why it
Clint
This rule is not currently enabled in Cinder. This review fixes up all
cases and enables it, which is absolutely 100% the right thing to do if we
decide to implement this rule.
The purpose of this thread is to understand the value of the rule. We
should either enforce it, or else
Wondering if heat should be performing this orchestration.
Would provide for a more pluggable front end to the action set.
-matt
On Feb 25, 2015 2:37 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
A few inline comments and a
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015, at 06:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23,
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015, at 03:14 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
During yesterday’s cross-project meeting [1], we discussed the Eventlet
Best Practices” spec [2] started by bnemec. The discussion of that spec
revolved
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015, at 03:14 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
During yesterday’s cross-project meeting [1], we discussed the
Eventlet
Cool! Glad to see it is not gone. Should it also be on the API reference
pages?
http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-networking-v2.html
PCM (Paul Michali)
IRC pc_m (irc.freenode.com)
Twitter... @pmichali
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com
On 2/25/15, 14:41, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2015-02-24 10:00:51 -0800 (-0800), Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
[...]
Recently, I have spent a lot more
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Paul Michali p...@michali.net wrote:
Cool! Glad to see it is not gone. Should it also be on the API reference
pages?
http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-networking-v2.html
Yes, we've had a doc bug since last fall about it being missing from the
API
Hi stackers,
When we started Rally we have a just small idea to make some tool that
generates load and measures performance. During almost 2 years a lot of
changed in Rally, so now it's quite common testing framework that allows to
cover various topics like: stress, load, volume, performance,
We've unwound the gate quite a bit, so the cost of extra patches in the
merge queue fixing trivial things (like comment spelling) is pretty low.
Honestly, I'd much rather merge functional fixes faster and not go an
extra 2 rounds of typo fixing (assuming the English is decipherable),
and merge
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015, at 04:04 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015, at 06:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On
Jay,
I can only confirm your point of view.
I personally landed such a patch yesterday and saw it as an easy way to get
familiar with Gerrit.
My goal being to land some more complex patches in the near future.
Bernard
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On 02/25/2015 02:54 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
During yesterday’s cross-project meeting [1], we discussed the Eventlet Best
Practices” spec [2] started by bnemec. The discussion of that spec revolved around
the question of whether our cross-project specs repository is the right place for
this
Hi everyone,
Just a quick reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be
tomorrow Thursday, February 26th at 17:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting
channel.
The agenda for tomorrow's meeting can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting
Anyone is welcome
Excerpts from Duncan Thomas's message of 2015-02-25 12:51:35 -0800:
Clint
This rule is not currently enabled in Cinder. This review fixes up all
cases and enables it, which is absolutely 100% the right thing to do if we
decide to implement this rule.
The purpose of this thread is to
You can horizontally split as well (if I understand what axis definitions
you are using). The Big Switch driver for example will bind ports that
belong to hypervisors running IVS while leaving the OVS driver to bind
ports attached to hypervisors running OVS.
I don't fully understand your comments
In the cases I'm referring to, OVS handles the security groups and
vswitch. The other drivers handle fabric configuration for VLAN tagging to
the host and whatever other plumbing they want to do.
On Feb 25, 2015 5:30 PM, loy wolfe loywo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:51 AM,
Oh, what you mean is vertical splitting, while I'm talking about horizontal
splitting.
I'm a little confused about why Neutron is designed so differently with
Nova and Cinder. In fact MD could be very simple, delegating nearly all
things out to agent. Remember Cinder volume manager? The real
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 25/02/15 15:37, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch
mailto:tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
A few inline comments and a general point
How do we handle scenarios like
Robert,
Thank you for all your input and insight over the last two years. Our
architectural discussions have been invaluable to me and helped shape
Ironic into what it is today.
All the best,
Devananda
On Tue Feb 24 2015 at 4:26:54 PM Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
Like with
On 2/24/2015 6:47 PM, Kevin Benton wrote:
More seriously, have you considered starting a tap-as-a-service project on
stackforge now that the services split has established a framework for
advanced services? Uploading the code you are using to do it is a great way
to get people motivated to try
On 26 February 2015 at 05:26, Ruby Loo rlooya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering what people thought about patches that only fix grammatical
issues or misspellings in comments in our code.
I can't believe I'm sending out this email, but as a group, I'd like it if
we had a similar
On 02/24/2015 12:27 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
I'm actually trying to judge it from the POV of users, not just
developers. I find it pretty untenable that in the fast moving
world of cloud, users have to wait as long as 6 months for a
feature to get into a openstack release, often much
On 25/02/15 19:15, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
mailto:zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 25/02/15 15:37, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch
mailto:tim.b...@cern.ch
Many of you may have gotten in the habit of copying the contrib/devstack
folder in order to make Manila work with Devstack.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/158054/
Once the above change merges, that method of installing Manila with
Devstack won't work anymore. Valeriy was kind enough to
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:51 AM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote:
The fact that a system doesn't use a neutron agent is not a good
justification for monolithic vs driver. The VLAN drivers co-exist with OVS
just fine when using VLAN encapsulation even though some are agent-less.
so how
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Matt Joyce m...@nycresistor.com wrote:
Wondering if heat should be performing this orchestration.
I wouldn't expect heat to have access to everything that needs to be
cleaned up.
Would provide for a more pluggable front end to the action set.
-matt
On
I'll follow-up on the spec, but one thing Donald has been pointing out
for a while is that we don't use requirements.txt the way that pip
anticipates: the expected use is that a specific install (e.g. the
gate) will have a very specific list of requirements, caps etc, but
that the install_requires
On 25/02/15 15:37, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch
mailto:tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
A few inline comments and a general point
How do we handle scenarios like volumes when we have a per-component
janitor rather than a single co-ordinator
Sounds like a very good idea. Cross project development shared knowledge.
Miguel Ángel Ajo
On Wednesday, 25 de February de 2015 at 22:32, michael mccune wrote:
On 02/25/2015 02:54 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
During yesterday’s cross-project meeting [1], we discussed the Eventlet
Best
On Thursday, 26 de February de 2015 at 7:48, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote:
Inline comments follow after this, but I wanted to respond to Brian question
which has been cut out:
We’re talking here of doing a preliminary analysis of the networking
performance,
before writing any real code at
Inline comments follow after this, but I wanted to respond to Brian question
which has been cut out:
We’re talking here of doing a preliminary analysis of the networking
performance,
before writing any real code at neutron level.
If that looks right, then we should go into a preliminary (and
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 07:48:51AM +0100, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote:
Also, ipset groups can be moved into conjunctive groups in OF (thanks Ben
Pfaff for the
explanation, if you’re reading this ;-))
You're welcome.
__
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote:
You can horizontally split as well (if I understand what axis definitions
you are using). The Big Switch driver for example will bind ports that
belong to hypervisors running IVS while leaving the OVS driver to bind
ports
Actually I have similar idea, an plan to work on it at L by a nova-spec (is
it worth a spec?).
But this idea not come from this bug, it's come from other cases:
1. Currently we need specified 'on_shared_storage' and 'block_migration'
when evacuate and live_migration. After we tracking the shared
The only thing I'd argue with here is the log level, Robert. Logstash on
the gate doesn't index trace/debug, so info or above would be far more
helpful, so that we can have a logstash query for the issue
On 25 February 2015 at 01:20, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
On 23
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 5:34 AM, Sukhdev Kapur sukhdevka...@gmail.com
wrote:
Folks,
A great discussion. I am not expert at OVN, hence, want to ask a question.
The answer may make a case that it should probably be a ML2 driver as
oppose to monolithic plugin.
Say a customer want to deploy
Hi,
I see the below error in my devstack and is raised from the package 'six'
AttributeError: 'Module_six_moves_urllib_parse' object has no attribute
'SplitResult'
Currently my devstack setup is having six 1.9.0 version. Could anyone help here
to fix the issue? Thanks.
Regards
Kanagaraj M
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:02:36PM -0800, Mark Atwood wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015, at 04:28, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
Along with the below, if push comes to shove, OpenStack Foundation could
probably try a milder variant (obviously, not all activities can be
categorized as 'critical
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:31:58AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
It's also worth noting that we were on a 3-month cycle at the start of
OpenStack. That was dropped after a cataclysmic release that managed the
feat of (a) not having anything significant done, and (b)
+1 to separate monolithic OVN plugin
The ML2 has been designed for co-existing of multiple heterogeneous
backends, it works well for all agent solutions: OVS, Linux Bridge, and
even ofagent.
However, when things come with all kinds of agentless solutions, especially
all kinds of SDN controller
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
