On 30/10/14 12:25 -0500, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 10/23/2014 04:18 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Oct 23, 2014, at 2:56 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 10/22/2014 08:15 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
The application projects are dropping python 2.6 support during Kilo, and I’ve
had several people ask recen
On 31/10/14 04:57 +, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
Hi Jay,
Wanted to clarify a few things around this:
1. are you using --is_public or --is-public option?
2. are you using stable/juno branch or it is a rc(1/2/3) from ubuntu packages?
After trying out:
glance image-create --is-public=True --disk-f
Are there any resources available or proven examples on using external
tools which call nova evacuate?
For example use a monitoring tool to detect node failure and let the
monitoring tool call evacuate on the instances which were running on the
failed compute node.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:28 PM
On 28/10/14 22:18 +, Jesse Cook wrote:
On 10/27/14, 6:08 PM, "Jay Pipes" wrote:
On 10/27/2014 06:18 PM, Jesse Cook wrote:
In the glance mini-summit there was a request for some documentation on
the architecture ideas I was discussing relating to: 1) removing data
consistency as a concer
Dear Sylvain and BLAZAR team,
I'd like to receive your feedback on our blueprint
(https://blueprints.launchpad.net/blazar/+spec/fair-share-lease) and
start a discussion in Paris the next week at the OpenStack Summit. Do
you have a time slot for a very short meeting on this?
Thanks in advance.
Hi Raanan,
In addition I would say that what you described after “Secondly” is one of the
most important reasons why Mistral exists. This is probably its strongest side
(not sure what else can fit so well).
Just in case, here are the screencasts that can highlight Mistral capabilities
(althoug
Le 31/10/2014 09:46, Lisa a écrit :
Dear Sylvain and BLAZAR team,
I'd like to receive your feedback on our blueprint
(https://blueprints.launchpad.net/blazar/+spec/fair-share-lease) and
start a discussion in Paris the next week at the OpenStack Summit. Do
you have a time slot for a very shor
Hello, Stackers/Trovers.
I’d like to start discussion about how do we use guestagent API that will
eventually be evaluated as a spec. For most of you who well-known with
Trove’s codebase knows how do Trove acts when provisioning new instance.
I’d like to point out next moments:
1.
When
Hi all,
in Midokura we are working on a blueprint to define a new kind of topology
for floating ranges, as alternative to external network topology. It is
based on the idea of a Provider Router that links directly with Tenant
Routers using /30 networks. It aims to be more pure-floating, helping th
Hi,
In the Juno release Murano team added a new feature - Actions. This feature
allows to declare actions as specific application methods which should be
executed when an action is triggered. When Murano deploys an application
with actions new web hooks will be created and exposed by Murano API. T
Hi,
Agents upgrade support will be common requirements which we needs to address on
priority.
Regards,
Keshava
-Original Message-
From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mest...@mestery.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 8:47 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Su
> -Original Message-
> From: Clint Byrum [mailto:cl...@fewbar.com]
> Sent: 28 October 2014 18:34
> To: openstack-dev
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tuskar][tripleo] Tuskar/TripleO on
> Devstack
>
> Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2014-10-28 11:13:22 -0700:
> > On 10/28/2014 06:18 AM,
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 03:23:20AM -0700, Georgy Okrokvertskhov wrote:
>Hi,
>
>In the Juno release Murano team added a new feature - Actions. This
>feature allows to declare actions as specific application methods which
>should be executed when an action is triggered. When Murano d
Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>> This is already on the agenda proposed by the board (as well as a quick
>> presentation on the need for structural reform in the ways we handle
>> projects in OpenStack).
>
> Would it be possible for the slidedeck and a quick summary of that
> presentation to be posted to th
Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 10/30/2014 12:12 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>> On 10/30/2014 04:53 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Thierry Carrez
>>> wrote:
>>>
Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 10/29/2014 09:07 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>> On 10/29/2014 06:46 PM, Rochelle Grob
Hello.
I found that glance do not provide any meta information for deleted
images, but hide them somewhere inside.
glance image-create -> #1
glance image-update #1 --property foo=bar
#1 now has foo=bar
nova start ... #1 <- instance use image with foo=bar
glance image-delete #1
... and now we h
Thierry Carrez wrote:
> We still expect a number of changes (TripleO session schedule is still
> tbd, we might drop the "gate debugging" cross-project workshop...). If
> anyone pushes a change to the live schedule at this point, it would be
> nice to post a corresponding public service announcement
Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
> Another option:
>
> 3) People consider the lower choices on their list to be equivalent. I
> personally tend to vote in tiers (these 3 are top choices, these 3 are
> secondary choices, these 6 are third choices) and I don’t differentiate
> individuals in the bottom t
Thank you so much Eduard :).
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Eduard Matei <
eduard.ma...@cloudfounders.com> wrote:
> Hi Darshan,
> Having just finished writing a volume driver i can say you need a lot of
> patience.
> First, to quickly answer your questions:
> 1. Read ALL the drivers in the off
Thank you so much Duncan.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Duncan Thomas
wrote:
> All excellent advice from Eduard. To confirm:
> - You will definitely need to write your driver in python.
> - Devstack is the recommended environment for development
> - Please look at the third party CI require
Hi Sylvain,
thanks for your answer.
Actually we haven't yet developed that because we'd like to be sure that
our proposal is fine with BLAZAR.
We already implemented a pluggable advanced scheduler for Nova which
addresses the issues we are experiencing with OpenStack in the Italian
National In
On 10/30/2014 09:15 PM, Adam Lawson wrote:
> I was thinking after reading all this; besides modifying the number of
> required patches, perhaps we could try a blind election; candidate names
> are removed so ballots have to be cast based on the merit of each
> candidate's responses to the questions
On 10/31/2014 08:00 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
Another option:
3) People consider the lower choices on their list to be
equivalent. I personally tend to vote in tiers (these 3 are top
choices, these 3 are secondary choices, these 6 are third choices)
and I don’t differe
Hi Lisa, Sylvain,
I'll take a look at blueprint next week and will try to left some feedback
about it.
Stay tuned.
Nikolay Starodubtsev
Software Engineer
Mirantis Inc.
Skype: dark_harlequine1
2014-10-31 16:14 GMT+04:00 Lisa :
> Hi Sylvain,
>
> thanks for your answer.
> Actually we haven't
I thought Monday network meeting agreed on that “VLAN aware VMs”, Trunk network
+ L2GW were different use cases.
Still I get the feeling that the proposals are put up against each other.
Here are some examples why bridging between Neutron internal networks using
trunk network and L2GW IMO sho
Hi all,
I'm implementing paging on storyboard, and I wanted to ask why we decided to
use marker based paging. I have some opinions on this, but I want to keep my
mouth shut until I find out what problem it was solving :)
Thanks,
Mike
___
OpenStack-d
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>> As discussed during the neutron-drivers meeting this week [1], we've
>> going to use one of the Neutron 40 minute design summit slots for
>> lightning talks. The basic idea is we will ha
On 10/29/2014 10:17 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Hly wrote:
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On 2014-10-29, at 下午8:01, Robert van Leeuwen
>> wrote:
>>
> I find our current design is remove all flows then add flow by entry, this
> will cause every network nod
Thank you Dimitri and Renat for your kind and swift replies. This was very
helpful at the least, it will certainly drive or reinforce an option I am
likely to promote and consider taking for driving integration both inside
and outside of OpenStack.
I won't unfortunately be going to the OpenStack
Hi Nikolay,
many thanks.
Cheers,
Lisa
On 31/10/2014 14:10, Nikolay Starodubtsev wrote:
Hi Lisa, Sylvain,
I'll take a look at blueprint next week and will try to left some
feedback about it.
Stay tuned.
*__*
Nikolay Starodubtsev
Software Engineer
Mirantis Inc.
Skype: dark_harlequine1
2
On 10/31/2014 08:29 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 10/30/2014 09:15 PM, Adam Lawson wrote:
>> I was thinking after reading all this; besides modifying the number of
>> required patches, perhaps we could try a blind election; candidate names
>> are removed so ballots have to be cast based on the mer
Hi colleagues,
here you can find the weekly report for MOS Infra activity -
https://mirantis.jira.com/wiki/display/MOSI/2014/10/31/MOSI+Weekly+Report%2C+Phase+%231%2C+29+Oct+2014+-+31+Oct+2014
Please, note that it includes the previous three days, previous reports
could be found in the MOSI space
Heh, wrong mailing list :(
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Sergey Lukjanov
wrote:
> Hi colleagues,
>
> here you can find the weekly report for MOS Infra activity -
> https://mirantis.jira.com/wiki/display/MOSI/2014/10/31/MOSI+Weekly+Report%2C+Phase+%231%2C+29+Oct+2014+-+31+Oct+2014
>
> Please,
On one hand, I agree a member of the TC should be a very active member
of the development community. Something I have not been, much to my shame.
However, there are obviously some fundamental issues in how the TC has been
governing OpenStack in the past few releases. Very serious issues in the
p
The schedule for the Paris sessions has been finalized and the API Working
Group has two design summit sessions and one follow up session on Thursday!
Part 1
Tuesday November 4, 2014 11:15 - 11:55
Room: Manet
http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/event/13fc460f359646dcd41d6a2d7ad0bec0
Part 2
Tuesd
Link to the follow up session
Thursday November 6, 2014 16:30 - 18:00
Room: Hyatt - Vendome room (Hyatt Hotel)
http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/event/3f0a5f22f2d641ef69965373f3e23983
Everett
On Oct 31, 2014, at 11:19 AM, Everett Toews wrote:
> The schedule for the Paris sessions has been fi
On 10/31/2014 12:17 PM, Matt Joyce wrote:
> On one hand, I agree a member of the TC should be a very active member
> of the development community. Something I have not been, much to my shame.
>
> However, there are obviously some fundamental issues in how the TC has been
> governing OpenStack in
Hi all,
In trying to find some alternate times for the Neutron LBaaS meeting, all
of the slots that fall roughly in business-ish hours for the US/Europe are
jam packed (at least on the days that aren’t risking long weekends.) I’d
like to propose adding #openstack-meeting-4 to alleviate this.
Ttx
Hi guys,
We are currently benchmarking our Scality object server backend for Swift. We
basically created a new DiskFile class that is used in a new ObjectController
that inherits from the native server.ObjectController. It's pretty similar to
how Ceph can be used as a backend for Swift objects.
Excerpts from Matt Joyce's message of 2014-10-31 09:17:23 -0700:
> On one hand, I agree a member of the TC should be a very active member
> of the development community. Something I have not been, much to my shame.
>
> However, there are obviously some fundamental issues in how the TC has been
>
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Doug Wiegley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In trying to find some alternate times for the Neutron LBaaS meeting, all
> of the slots that fall roughly in business-ish hours for the US/Europe are
> jam packed (at least on the days that aren’t risking long weekends.) I’d
> l
Hi Denis,
It seems like the issue you're trying to solve is that these 'prepare' messages
can't be consumed by the guest.
So, if the guest never actually comes online and therefore can't consume the
prepare call, then you'll be left with the message in the queue forever.
If you use a ping-pong
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 10/31/2014 12:17 PM, Matt Joyce wrote:
>> On one hand, I agree a member of the TC should be a very active member
>> of the development community. Something I have not been, much to my shame.
>>
>> However, there are obviously some funda
For those of you with this crazy creepy candy holiday, happy Halloween to
you!
Here's a rundown of this week in docs.
The install guide has been tested for the main core projects on RHEL and
Ubuntu -- trove and sahara, we need more testing for the install guide on
your projects specifically. See
On 10/31/14, 3:21 AM, "Flavio Percoco" wrote:
>On 28/10/14 22:18 +, Jesse Cook wrote:
>>
>>
>>On 10/27/14, 6:08 PM, "Jay Pipes" wrote:
>>
>>>On 10/27/2014 06:18 PM, Jesse Cook wrote:
In the glance mini-summit there was a request for some documentation
on
the architecture idea
>> Did you test this with an admin user?
Yes, did test it with an admin user.
>> may be caused by an upgrade from Icehouse -> Juno.
Possibly, good point.
Thanks,
-Nikhil
From: Flavio Percoco [fla...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 4:03 AM
To: O
Hi all,
I wanted to highlight that as mentioned in the OpenStack NFV subteam meeting
yesterday [1] there is a Ops Summit session aiming to bring together those
interested in the use of OpenStack to provide the infrastructure for
communication services. This includes, but is not limited to:
- C
I was posed this question, but am not familiar with Horizon or StackTach
cookie management. Anyone know what the issue might be?
Issue: Logging into one site logs you out of the other. (horizon/stacktach)
First I open horizon and notice there are two cookies: csrftoken
(horizon) and sessi
I have no familiarity with stacktach, but it sounds like it's trampling data on
the sessionid cookie (even if it's also setting a beaker.session.stacktach
cookie).
Your options include running the two at different domains/subdomains (and
specifying the subdomain as the cookie domain; that needs
Maruti's talk is, in fact, so interesting that we should probably get
together and talk about this earlier in the week. I very much want to see
virtual-physical programmatic bridging, and I know Kevin Benton is also
interested. Arguably the MPLS VPN stuff also is similar in scope. Can I
propose
I’ll +1 this. I think this is going to be relevant to quite a few things,
including NFV and routing (if you want to establish an L2 neighbor for ISIS…).
This seems like a useful feature.
-Anthony
Maruti's talk is, in fact, so interesting that we should probably get together
and talk about thi
On 10/28/14, 11:01 AM, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:18:37AM -0400, Jay Pipes wrote:
>> On 10/28/2014 07:44 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> >One option would be a more CSV like syntax eg
>> >
>> >pci_passthrough_whitelist =
>>address=*0a:00.*,physical_network=phy
Hi all,
It was noticed in the past few meetings that the participation in the
alternating time-slot of Thursday at 20 UTC (or called as "later time slot")
was low. With the growing interest in Glance of developers from eastern
latitudes and their involvement in meetings, please find this email
Hi All,
Chris Yeoh started the use of an APIImpact flag in commit messages for specs in
Nova. It adds a requirement for an APIImpact flag in the commit message for a
proposed spec if it proposes changes to the REST API. This will make it much
easier for people such as the API Working Group who
FYI, this has been made effective as of earlier this week. Please be on the
look out for any mysteriously failing tests in your specs...
Thanks,
-Nikhil
From: Nikhil Komawar [nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 9:31 PM
To: openstack-dev@l
Hi Ian, all,
I would very much like that. Please let me know what time works for you. I will
be in Paris all 5 days.
Thanks,
Hanif.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 31, 2014, at 9:07 PM, Ian Wells wrote:
>
> Maruti's talk is, in fact, so interesting that we should probably get
> together and
Hi Kyle,
Thanks a lot for organizing this. I heard from Tom Nadeau that you might not be
coming to Paris. Hope all is well.
Hanif.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 31, 2014, at 3:09 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 3
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Tim Simpson
wrote:
> Hi Denis,
>
> It seems like the issue you're trying to solve is that these 'prepare'
> messages can't be consumed by the guest.
>
Not only 'prepare' call. I want to point out that each RPC API call that
uses RPC 'cast' messaging type may rem
Thanks for bringing this up, Nikhil.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
> Here's a poll [0] to find what time-slots work best for everyone as well as
> for the interest to remove the alternating time-slot aspect in the schedule.
Could this poll be expanded with a wider range of times? I'
On 31 October 2014 06:29, Erik Moe wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I thought Monday network meeting agreed on that “VLAN aware VMs”, Trunk
> network + L2GW were different use cases.
>
>
>
> Still I get the feeling that the proposals are put up against each other.
>
I think we agreed they were different, or at
Go read about HSRP and VRRP. What you propose is akin to turning off one
physical switch port and turning on another when you want to switch from an
active physical server to a standby, and this is not how it's done in
practice; instead, you connect the two VMs to the same network and let them
de
To address a point or two that Armando has raised here that weren't covered
in my other mail:
On 28 October 2014 11:00, Armando M. wrote:
> - Core Neutron changes: what needs to happen to the core of Neutron, if
> anything, so that we can implement this NFV-enabling constructs
> successfully? Ar
On 2014-10-31 13:50:25 +1300 (+1300), Robert Collins wrote:
> Actually no - because of pip install, we need to keep support up until
> we can tell folk we don't support them anymore, which is after the
> last point release, not at it. If we drop support earlier, we can't
> release the support dropp
On 2014-10-31 09:24:31 +1000 (+1000), Angus Salkeld wrote:
> +1 to this, with a term limit.
Notable that the Debian TC has been discussing term limits for
months now, and since DebConf they seem to have gotten much closer
to a concrete proposal[1] in the last week or so. Could be worth
watching fo
Thanks for voting Louis!
Finding a spot in a channel is always tricky. If we get early votes, we can
determine our position for this [0] proposal.
[0] http://osdir.com/ml/openstack-dev/2014-10/msg02119.html
-Nikhil
From: Louis Taylor [krag...@gmail.com]
65 matches
Mail list logo
