Well, I’m taking my hat off in front of you, no kidding and pun intended ;)
Do you need traceback from the error page ?
From: Durand fabrice [mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 7:02 PM
To: E.P.
Cc: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re:
Hm…
This is interesting. I’m building the whole packetfence solution for a large
WiFi network distributed through 20 sites and built on Ubiquiti Unifi. What was
your previous controller version, Fabrice ? I’m also on 5.6.22 now
Eugene
From: Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users
Yes, db.sqlite3 was owned by root
[root@PacketFence-ZEN packetfence-pki]# ls -al
total 56
drwxr-xr-x 7 pf pf 128 Dec 12 08:49 .
drwxr-xr-x. 15 root root 182 Dec 12 01:33 ..
drwxrws--- 2 pf pf 6 Nov 15 14:20 ca
drwxr-xr-x 2 pf pf 125 Dec 12 01:33 conf
Sure, take your time, Fabrice. I have a special knack of running into troubles
in cases when others didn’t have any :)
Eugene
Sent from iPhone
> On Dec 12, 2017, at 18:18, Durand fabrice wrote:
>
> Ok let me try to install the pki on the zen and i will be back to you.
>
>
Hi guys,
I'm trying to follow the guide published here:
https://packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_PKI_Quick_Install_Guide.html
My setup is based on ZEN virtual appliance and I understand it runs CentOS 7
Linux.
Now when I'm trying to install packetfence-pki package as in step 3.1.6 of
the
Sorry, and I forgot to add that I have this fancy mambo-django installed ;)
[root@PacketFence-ZEN ~]# django-admin --version
1.6.11.6
The installer says that this package will be updated but still stops with an
error:
--> Processing Dependency: python-django-bootstrap3 for package:
yum makecache --enablerepo=packetfence,packetfence-extra
yum install packetfence-pki --enablerepo=packetfence-extra, packetfence
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2017-12-11 à 16:03, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Hi guys,
Im trying to follow the guide published here:
https://packetfence.org/
all packetfence-pki --enablerepo=packetfence-extra, packetfence
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2017-12-11 à 16:03, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Hi guys,
Im trying to follow the guide published here:
https://packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_PKI_Quick_Install_Guide.html
My setup is ba
tra, packetfence
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2017-12-11 à 16:03, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Hi guys,
Im trying to follow the guide published here:
https://packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_PKI_Quick_Install_Guide.html
My setup is based on ZEN virtual appliance and I understand it r
nce
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2017-12-11 à 16:03, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Hi guys,
Im trying to follow the guide published here:
https://packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_PKI_Quick_Install_Guide.html
My setup is based on ZEN virtual appliance and I understand it runs CentO
tra, packetfence
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2017-12-11 à 16:03, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Hi guys,
Im trying to follow the guide published here:
https://packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_PKI_Quick_Install_Guide.html
My setup is based on ZEN virtual appliance and I understand it runs CentO
nce-extra, packetfence
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2017-12-11 à 16:03, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Hi guys,
Im trying to follow the guide published here:
https://packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_PKI_Quick_Install_Guide.html
My setup is based on ZEN virtual appliance and I underst
Well, we are getting closer ;)
Ran the python script to migrate the database it completed
[root@PacketFence-ZEN packetfence-pki]# python manage.py migrate
Operations to perform:
Synchronize unmigrated apps: staticfiles, rest_framework, messages,
bootstrap3
Apply all migrations:
st instead of radtest.
(http://deployingradius.com/scripts/eapol_test/)
Also use the port 1812 instead of 18120.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2017-12-28 à 03:07, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Guys,
I still hope someone with more experience with PF give me a hand with this
trivial issue (if it i
test/)
Also use the port 1812 instead of 18120.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2017-12-28 à 03:07, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Guys,
I still hope someone with more experience with PF give me a hand with this
trivial issue (if it is an issue)
I’m on my way to test PF with baby steps and jus
Hi John,
I still have a fresh experience with configuring AD in PF and it worked to me
from the first try.
Just to understand it clearly, you can’t complete the configuration if you add
the source, i.e.
>From the Configuration → Policies and Access Control → Authentication Sources,
>Add
Sorry for being a pain in the lower part of the back, Fabrice ;)
I thought that the admin user in PF is different from PKI.
At least I know that I did change the password for admin in PF as you described
and this is how I login to the main GUI.
But I can’t login as admin with the same password
I’m curious, did you create a new realm or used the default one and linked it
to AD ?
I tried to create a new realm and it is placed in the end of the list and the
authentication never reached it.
It only worked to me if I link the default realm to AD
Eugene
From: j...@momentumvr.co.uk
, same results, reason -
eap_tls: SSL says error 20 : unable to get local issuer certificate
Eugene
From: Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users
[mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 6:07 AM
To: E.P. via PacketFence-users
Cc: Fabrice Durand
Subject
est instead of radtest.
(http://deployingradius.com/scripts/eapol_test/)
Also use the port 1812 instead of 18120.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2017-12-28 à 03:07, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Guys,
I still hope someone with more experience with PF give me a hand with this
trivial issue (i
: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 6:07 AM
To: E.P. via PacketFence-users
Cc: Fabrice Durand
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Device authentication with client TLS
certificate issued by PKI
Hello Eugene,
you probably need to import the CA certificate or uncheck verify server
certificate in your
issuer certificate
Eugene
From: Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users
[mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 6:07 AM
To: E.P. via PacketFence-users
Cc: Fabrice Durand
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Device authentication with client TLS
And here comes the culmination of my saga with PKI ;)
Actually, I was slowly going towards it and really hoped I will jump through
this final hoop smoothly.
Alas… Anyways, to cut the long story short, I failed TLS authentication for
Windows 10 endpoint.
Here’s what I did so far. We want to
Fabrice,
Can you please elaborate on provisioners and connection profiles within PKI
context
Let’s say I created a provisioner for Windows endpoints as described in the
guide.
How would it allow Windows host to automatically connect to a specific SSID?
As far as I know you can put a check
Couple of questions on PKI, Fabfice
1. How would I change the password for admin user in PKI. The “User
Management” section gives me the option of editing the admin user but I can’t
see the password change option
2. I’m adding a server certificate after I created a server
then PacketFence will use it (you
can strip the username if needed in the source).
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2018-01-07 à 19:32, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
I’m curious, did you create a new realm or used the default one and linked it
to AD ?
I tried to create a new realm and it is placed
Hi Fabrice,
I confirm that I was finally able to rebuild PKI and configure it
At least logged in successfully to PKI configuration and went through 4 steps
of creating certificates
Very much appreciate your time and efforts !
Trying to figure it out how to roll out certificates to various
It sounds close to the number of devices/nodes a user can register which is
configurable under Configuration-Policies and access control-Roles, but we
don't allow this luxury to anyone yet. Just regular network admission
control based on the active AD account
From: E.P.
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Fabrice Durand
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] PKI provisioning configuration for Apple OS/iOS
Hello Eugene,
Le 2018-01-13 à 02:59, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Folks,
Our two big shots in the organization live their lives with Apple
Guys,
We are still at the early phases of PF deployment and only now looking into
AD based authentication for wireless devices
Is there any way to limit the number of user devices that can be connected
by one user?
Let's say the user uses his/her laptop and roams around remote sites where
we
Folks,
Our two big shots in the organization live their lives with Apple macbooks and
we need to get them on the secure WiFi.
Can someone explain me where and how to get the content of certificates that
are trusted by Apple devices.
The guide on PKI says Verisign certificate could be an
@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Durand fabrice
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] NULL realm
Hello Eugene,
the NULL realm is located in realm.conf.defaults
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2018-01-23 à 14:14, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Guys,
I wonder if I can make PF bypass NULL realm processing?
The reason
to the network
Hello Eugene,
this is exactly where you have to control that.
So just set a limit on the roles where you want to limit the number of
devices per users.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2018-01-16 à 02:01, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
It sounds close to the number of devices
-users] Number of devices to connect to the network
Hello Eugene,
this is exactly where you have to control that.
So just set a limit on the roles where you want to limit the number of
devices per users.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2018-01-16 à 02:01, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
It sounds
And I dare to ask this question again about provisioners.
I’m struggling with allowing iPads to the network with certificates issued to
their MAC addresses
Eugene
From: E.P. [mailto:ype...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 1:05 AM
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
ourceforge.net
Cc: Durand fabrice
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] VLAN assigment by RADIUS
Hello Eugene,
check in the radius audit log, you will see the radius answer.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2018-01-29 à 19:41, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Guys,
How can I see if a specific VLAN
-01-29 à 18:04, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Folks,
Im trying to understand how to enable violations for bandwidth with
accounting
Looking at this youtube video example but dont see it could be done in the
current version of PF.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nSrYKkX7wk
The only
r-Name = "it.tech"
From: Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users
[mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 5:18 PM
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Durand fabrice
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] VLAN assigment by RADIUS
Hell
Hi Tim,
As usual, your comments are invaluable ;)
Looking at the guide which is in asciidoc to see how to properly deal with
Unifi. Would be nice to see pictures as they are missing.
Also, do I need to replace IP addresses for AP in the switches.conf with their
MAC addresses ?
Eugene
Hi Fabrice,
I feel awkward resurrecting this topic but I believe something happened to PKI
after I upgraded PF to 7.4
Really want it to be not connected with it but I can’t login to PKI admin
interface.
The login page shows normally with a prompt for username/password, I enter
previously
Folks,
I'm trying to understand how to enable violations for bandwidth with
accounting
Looking at this youtube video example but don't see it could be done in the
current version of PF.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nSrYKkX7wk
The only section on Violations is under Configuration -
Well, I'd rather paraphrase my question as to how to use available
"Bandwidth limit" violation to limit a user session based on a specific
bandwidth value.
Eugene
From: E.P. [mailto:ype...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 3:04 PM
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
ourceforge.net
Cc: Durand fabrice
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] VLAN assigment by RADIUS
Hello Eugene,
check in the radius audit log, you will see the radius answer.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2018-01-29 à 19:41, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Guys,
How can I see if a specific VLAN
d fabrice
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] VLAN assigment by RADIUS
Hello Eugene,
check in the radius audit log, you will see the radius answer.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2018-01-29 à 19:41, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Guys,
How can I see if a specific VLAN ID that I assigned to
Hi Yijie,
I’ve spent some time with PKI as well trying to figure out how to make it work
and deploy certificates.
Have it currently inaccessible for the reason unknown to me yet, but as far as
I remember the CA certificate is in *.PEM format and all you have to do is
manually install it on
+49 (0) 152 3452 0056
a:
w:
Hammersteiner Straße 50, 79400 Kandern
<http://bfacademy.de/> bfacademy.de
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 7:33 AM, E.P. via PacketFence-users
<packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.n
As a quick update to it, I captured traffic coming from UniFi controller to PF
during the connection of the client to guest SSID and see that there’s a
request coming to port 9000 (172.16.0.222 is my PF)
Hi Tim and gang,
Any idea where I should start looking into PF to troubleshoot WebAuth for WiFi ?
I finally had time to prepare UniFi according to screenshots published at github
https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/tree/ae18f50b4879cc2d4132490fcee33f2fbe53b36f/docs/images
Namely this
Folks,
I'm struggling to put all pieces together to make it work like it is
described in this guide:
https://www.puc.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/162455/PacketFence-Login-For
-Guests.pdf
Would appreciate if someone will give me an advice where to start in PF.
Or alternatively if my
Yes, David, this is my plan to test the captive portal on wired connections to
rule out the unruly Unifi APs
Ideally I would love to make it also work with HP switches 1820/1920 model
because this is the majority of switches installed in our organization.
But will try it on Cisco switch as a
Folks,
Trying to figure out if the wired network I inherited is ready for port
based access control.
We run mostly HP 1820/1920 switches on the access layer. Their technical
specs do state that they support dot1x and RADIUS.
But I didn't find any references about these models in the device here
e,
do you have the capture ?
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2018-02-15 à 23:12, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Hi Fabrice,
I dare sending it again believing my previous email fell into cracks.
Can you please advise what could be wrong (see below)
Eugene
From: E.P. [mailto:ype...@gma
eforge.net>
Cc: Durand fabrice <fdur...@inverse.ca <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca> >
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Access to PF captive portal is blocked
Hello Eugene,
do you have the capture ?
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2018-02-15 à 23:12, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Hi Fab
nd fabrice <fdur...@inverse.ca <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca> >
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Access to PF captive portal is blocked
Hello Eugene,
do you have the capture ?
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2018-02-15 à 23:12, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Hi Fabrice,
I dare sending it a
Hello folks,
I really hope someone who ran into a similar problem will shed some light.
Feeling bad we don't hear anything from Fabrice or someone from inverse.
I have an out-of-band deployment of PF and my WiFi client gets connected and
redirected to PF
I see redirects by capturing the
Hi Fabrice,
I dare sending it again believing my previous email fell into cracks.
Can you please advise what could be wrong (see below)
Eugene
From: E.P. [mailto:ype...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 1:08 AM
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Access
Hey guys,
Can someone confirm that PF can be configured and used in conjunction with
user authenticating his/her endpoint with the certificate issued by PF PKI ?
I tried to configure PKI and failed at some point stumbling over the
challenge with RPMs and errors. Fabrice said that he will give it
Guys,
I still hope someone with more experience with PF give me a hand with this
trivial issue (if it is an issue)
I'm on my way to test PF with baby steps and just created a user under Users
section in PF GUI.
Then I test it using a simple command like this and it seems to work using
the local
Folks,
Is this mailing list active currently ?
I’m not receiving any emails. It could be that everyone is on holidays but for
me it is the only time when I can do more tests with PF ;)
Eugene
--
Check out the
Hello Eugene,
in fact for 802.1x you need to use eapol_test instead of radtest.
(http://deployingradius.com/scripts/eapol_test/)
Also use the port 1812 instead of 18120.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2017-12-28 à 03:07, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Guys,
I still hope someone with more
,
in fact for 802.1x you need to use eapol_test instead of radtest.
(http://deployingradius.com/scripts/eapol_test/)
Also use the port 1812 instead of 18120.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2017-12-28 à 03:07, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Guys,
I still hope someone with more experience
eed to use eapol_test instead of radtest.
(http://deployingradius.com/scripts/eapol_test/)
Also use the port 1812 instead of 18120.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2017-12-28 à 03:07, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Guys,
I still hope someone with more experience with PF give me a hand with this
trivial i
c: Durand fabrice
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Need an advice and maybe assistance with
FreeRADIUS
Hello Eugene,
in fact for 802.1x you need to use eapol_test instead of radtest.
(http://deployingradius.com/scripts/eapol_test/)
Also use the port 1812 instead of 18120.
Regards
Fabrice
Le
r 802.1x you need to use eapol_test instead of radtest.
(http://deployingradius.com/scripts/eapol_test/)
Also use the port 1812 instead of 18120.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2017-12-28 à 03:07, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Guys,
I still hope someone with more experience with PF give me a hand
Great, will try to do it a bit later
Thanks, Fabrice
From: Fabrice Durand [mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2018 12:26 PM
To: E.P.
Cc: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] PKI installation
Just for information, i uploaded a new
rds
Fabrice
Le 2017-12-28 à 03:07, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Guys,
I still hope someone with more experience with PF give me a hand with this
trivial issue (if it is an issue)
I’m on my way to test PF with baby steps and just created a user under Users
section in PF GUI.
] Need an advice and maybe assistance with
FreeRADIUS
Hello Eugene,
in fact for 802.1x you need to use eapol_test instead of radtest.
(http://deployingradius.com/scripts/eapol_test/)
Also use the port 1812 instead of 18120.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2017-12-28 à 03:07, E.P. via PacketFence-users
maybe assistance with
FreeRADIUS
Hello Eugene,
in fact for 802.1x you need to use eapol_test instead of radtest.
(http://deployingradius.com/scripts/eapol_test/)
Also use the port 1812 instead of 18120.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2017-12-28 à 03:07, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Guys,
Guys,
I wonder if I can make PF bypass NULL realm processing?
The reason is that we want to use only the user ID in the username field.
If we use like this then the authentication attempt hits NULL realm.
I tried to remove it from PF GUI but it still stays there.
Interesting that it is not
configuration for Apple OS/iOS
Hello Eugene,
Le 2018-01-13 à 02:59, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Folks,
Our two big shots in the organization live their lives with Apple macbooks and
we need to get them on the secure WiFi.
Can someone explain me where and how to get the content
à 02:01, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
It sounds close to the number of devices/nodes a user can register which is
configurable under Configuration-Policies and access control-Roles, but we
dont allow this luxury to anyone yet. Just regular network admission
control based on the active AD
to the network
Hello Eugene,
this is exactly where you have to control that.
So just set a limit on the roles where you want to limit the number of
devices per users.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2018-01-16 à 02:01, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
It sounds close to the number of devices/nodes
on the roles where you want to limit the number of
devices per users.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2018-01-16 à 02:01, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
It sounds close to the number of devices/nodes a user can register which is
configurable under Configuration-Policies and access control-Roles
have that works with default realm?
Short term, it might just suffice for us.
Regards
Jimmy
Van: E.P. via PacketFence-users
[mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net]
Verzonden: woensdag 7 maart 2018 4:33
Aan: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:packetfence-users
Hi Jimmy and Fabrice,
I would like to report the same experience. I have a realm
(OPTIONS-AD-REALM) and it is associated with the AD domain (optionsad), i.e.
[OPTIONS-AD-REALM]
domain=optionsad
options=strip
I had similar problems with winbind, same errors in the output of RADIUS
Good morning, Fabrice,
I ran chroot /chroots/optionsad wbinfo -u and received the output of all users
and groups from AD where optionsad is my AD domain.
And here’s what I see in RADIUS debugs when I use a named realm, not the
default one, Windows supplicant uses PEAP method
f967ad1ee589
136a097166c440cb30107ddfb.diff | patch -p1
curl
https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/2735/commits/34405d44b203ce2
fd4a4dac435ff62d69c4ed00f.diff | patch -p1
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2018-03-06 à 22:53, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Theres another challenge in the endless string of them
My PEA
nother try
?
curl
https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/2735/commits/1eef967ad1ee589
136a097166c440cb30107ddfb.diff | patch -p1
curl
https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/2735/commits/34405d44b203ce2
fd4a4dac435ff62d69c4ed00f.diff | patch -p1
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2018-03-06 à 22:53, E.P. via PacketFenc
Hi Fabrice,
So, what is the expected order of realms processing ?
Any ideas or enlightenments about what is wrong?
I restarted radius service many times and even rebooted the appliance
From: Fabrice Durand [mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2018 5:32 AM
To: E.P.
https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/2735/commits/34405d44b203ce2
fd4a4dac435ff62d69c4ed00f.diff | patch -p1
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2018-03-06 à 22:53, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Theres another challenge in the endless string of them
My PEAP connection from Windows based supplicant lan
Hi Chris,
Welcome on board, we are in the same boat with someone else here with the same
error message.
I already provided Fabrice with all sort of answers here kindly requested
trying to help me but we are still at nowhere.
Hoping this issue will be a spotlight
Eugene
-Original
pfcmd
service radius restart.
If the proxy.conf.inc file is still empty then open an issue on github.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2018-03-13 à 22:00, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
> Hi Chris,
> Welcome on board, we are in the same boat with someone else here with the
> same error message
patch detected! Assume -R? [n] n
Apply anyway? [n] y
Hunk #1 FAILED at 43.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 169.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file lib/pf/enforcement.pm.rej
On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 6:44 PM, E.P. via PacketFence-users
<packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
&l
Easy
cat /usr/local/pf/raddb/proxy.conf.inc
realm default {
strip
}
From: Durand fabrice [mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2018 6:42 PM
To: E.P. ; packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] [Packetfence] AD
There's another challenge in the endless string of them.
My PEAP connection from Windows based supplicant lands on the connection
profile and wheels start rotating, i.e. the profile uses the authentication
source
The connection and authentication completes but there's no role assignment
and I
Guys,
I'm sending it in vain not believing that there's anyone at PF watching this
list.
Is Packetfence going through hard time? I even send a request about the
commercial support, no reply from anyone.
Still hoping someone will pick it up, please help !
I migrated to a fresh install of PF
packetfence when setting up the switch?
Should I use hostapd or Unifi Controller? Should I enable COA or not?
Does anyone have a working setup of Unifi APs with an out of band setup of
packetfence at this point? If so, could you shed some light and post your
configurations?
Than
packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Durand fabrice <fdur...@inverse.ca <mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca> >
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Access to PF captive portal is blocked
Hello Eugene,
do you have the capture ?
Regards
Folks,
I feel awkward to bombard this list with questions but I do hope I'm heard
and someone can help me.
On the way to make the captive portal to surface but stumbling upon the
redirect or rather packetfence not completing it.
I'm connecting to the guest SSID and open the web browser on the
Could you provide some insight as to what OS, and browser you're using? Context
would be helpful.
Nicholas P. Pier
Network & Virtualization Engineer
CCNP RS, PCSNSE7, VCIX6-DCV, VCIX6-NV
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 7:45 PM E.P. via PacketFence-users
mailto:packetfence-users@lis
ide some insight as to what OS, and browser you're using? Context
would be helpful.
Nicholas P. Pier
Network & Virtualization Engineer
CCNP RS, PCSNSE7, VCIX6-DCV, VCIX6-NV
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 7:45 PM E.P. via PacketFence-users
mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.ne
VCIX6-DCV, VCIX6-NV
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 7:45 PM E.P. via PacketFence-users
mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > wrote:
I would appreciate if anyone reply and confirm that this email is making it to
packetfence users list
Eugene
From: E.P. mailto:ype...@gmail.com&g
with VLAN
enforcement. This guide might be useful to you:
http://www.packetfence.org/downloads/PacketFence/doc/PacketFence_Out-of-Band_Deployment_Quick_Guide_ZEN-5.4.0.pdf
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 2:20 PM E.P. via PacketFence-users
mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> >
I would appreciate if anyone reply and confirm that this email is making it
to packetfence users list
Eugene
From: E.P.
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2019 12:11 PM
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: PF 9.0.1 initial setup is stuck on database page
Hey guys,
Maybe I'm
Hey guys,
Maybe I'm special or it is a bad witchcraft on me.
After a long time I got back to Packetfence as we still need to secure
Ubiquiti Unifi WiFi with dot1x via RADIUS
Well, trying to install zero effort appliance and stuck at the initial pages
after creating database user.
Clicking on
Folks,
My boss wants to manually allow devices that connect to a specific SSID (via
WPA2-Enterprise/RADIUS) and the way to do it is manually register them
under Nodes section and also assign them a role including REJECT.
Does it seem doable ?
I compared two endpoints, one of them is registered
Hi Chad,
It’ll be very useful to know a bit about AD architecture
Overall, you can of course use any user from your AD but whatever was written
in the documentation was done for a reason.
This is how it all works.
The procedure is pretty much simple. I used this document to configure only
.net>
Cc: Nicolas Quiniou-Briand mailto:n...@inverse.ca> >
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Manual device registration to allow it to the
network
Hello Eugene,
On 2019-07-03 8:10 a.m., E.P. via PacketFence-users wrote:
> Does it seem doable ?
Yes. When you say (via WPA2-En
registration to allow it to the
network
Hello Eugene,
On 2019-07-03 8:10 a.m., E.P. via PacketFence-users wrote:
> Does it seem doable ?
Yes. When you say (via WPA2-Enterprise/RADIUS), you mean with 802.1X ?
> I compared two endpoints, one of them is registered with
and assign a role manually.
That's it.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 19-07-03 à 14 h 44, E.P. via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Now I’m getting confused after trying to understand RADIUS enforcement.
Reading the document that says:
Using RADIUS enforcement, everytime a device connects
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo