* From: Paul.Stregevsky
* Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 14:47:57 -0800
You said it, Gerald. Several of my
Hi,
I am Jaume Lahuerta from the PDML,
How much do you want for the A35/2?
I am also a bit worried for shipping prices (I am in
Spain). Any idea of this?
Thanks,
Jaume
--- Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Team,
Please contact me directly for prices, photographs
or further
Sorry, my last message to Rob was private... (dammn
'reply' :-) )
jaume
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go
Todd Stanley wrote:
- MX...113
- ME Super.104
- ME Super SE3
=107
- LX...107
Things are not looking so good for the LX, it's tied with the ME Super...
Oh, now that was mean, Todd.
-Aaron
-
This message is
X - A scroll of news from
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Read it? [yn] y
Did anyone just recieve a blank email from an undisclosed sender
with the above attachment?
Thanks
[Opens Spam folder...]
Yep. I get one of those every Friday from different places.
Looks like the Hybris worm/virus to
Does anybody know if Pentax is working on any kind of IS or VR technology?
Yes they are working on it. They have patents on telephoto IS lenses, zoom IS lenses
(both used by Canon) and IS teleconverters. Not a word though, when or if they are
going to market it.
Pl
-
This message is
Sh*t yes! Well, their web site is still listing the older price, so maybe they
can be "convinced" to offer a rebate...(based on laws regarding "publicit mensongere"
--
false or misleading advertisement)...
Anyway, they also have a huge stock of used equipment which Albano's friend
-and others
Harry wrote:
By the way. Were you able to put the PZ1P back togeather and did it
work?
Yes. Its very easy to dissasemble and assemble. You have to be careful though with the
contacts underneath the mode selector dial. They easily bend out of place. I've
ordered a new top and bottom cover
Esteemed Bob Walkden wrote:
Whereas more experienced photographers might take the attitude that 10
rolls=10 subjects, at most. Again, referring to St. David Hurn (who is
actually rather scornful of talk about quantity), he says maybe 1/2 a
dozen frames/subject on average. He also says that
On 9 Mar 2001, at 14:04, Rob Studdert wrote:
Hi Team,
Please contact me directly for prices, photographs or further information on
item/s of interest...
Pics of the SMCP-A35f2 for those interested:
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~geroc/fs803.jpg
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~geroc/fs804.jpg
Now I'm worried. I picked up my Vivitar 18-28 PK-A mount from the repair
shop last week. The front part was a tad loose and they tighten it back up.
Now looking through the back of the lens and moving the F stops, the
aperture stays the same. When I push the small protruding lever with my
finger,
Claude--
If you're going to keep posting generalizations without backing them up,
people are going to keep getting angry at you. What features does the
MZ-S lack, in your opinion, making it not worth the price and not a
pro-level camera and not a worthy successor to the PZ-1? Without the
Chris Brogden wrote:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Martin Albrecht wrote:
I have
[snip]
2 MX
Hey, Aaron, it's about time for you to get another few LX's, isn't it?
I'm feelin' pretty downtrodden today...does anyone want to make me feel
better by buying me an LX or three? *sniff*
-Aaron
Proud owner of a K1000.
Hey, welcome to the family! I don't have any personal experience with
the 50mm f1.2 (other than wanting one), so I'll let someone else tell
you about that in detail, but I think the general consensus is that the
50mm f1.2 is not quite as sharp as the 1.4 at the wider
I would say they are pretty much the same at the apertures they share. But,
if you need the extra speed of the f/1.2 often enough to justify the
difference in price, get one.
Len
---
Though I am using Nikon FM2N for a last few years, during my
last visit to USA in Jan 2001, I have forgotton
PAUL STENQUIST wrote:
I tend to agree with your preference
for the K versions. My most
frequently used lenses seem to be Ks,
and I only wish I owned more
examples of this series. However,
I do like a couple of the M lenses,
most notably the 50/1.7 and the 35/2.0.
I like the M50/1.7
While my wife is out of town, taking my zx-5n with her I decided that the kids
and I should go to the local botanical gardens for some picture taking
opportunities. I armed myself with the spotmatic (the mirror came unstuck),
my oldest girl (10) got the k1000 and my youngest (8) was given the
My apologies, Shel. In my table of comments, I must have pasted someone
else's October 2000 comment, at the bottom of which he had quoted an
earlier comment of yours. I probably failed to paste in his name, saw only
yours, and mistakenly attributed it to you.
I sure have a knack for getting on
I just bought my first "K" lens, a 50/1.4, and I must say that I
love the "feel" and heft of it. It just seems very right on my
K2.
Paul wrote:
I tend to agree with your preference for the K versions. My most
frequently used lenses seem to be Ks, and I only wish I owned more
examples of this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I sure have a knack for getting on your wrong side! :)
?
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are no rules for good photographs,
there are only good photographs.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
With the ZX-M, does the lens open and close when you move the aperture ring
when the lens is mounted on the body? (You can check this better with a
flashlight.) And does the viewfinder lighten and darken in DOF mode when you
move the mounted lens's aperture ring? If so, you're okay. In my case,
I didn't mean It will sell fine. I was just saying that
it is not difficult to build a digital back for a film
camera I am sure it will not sell well but we can
dream about a world where money is not so important ... :)
Alex
John Francis wrote:
Your opinion, obviously, differs. But while
There is also the inexpensive option of buying a 'normal' 50mm and a 2x
teleconvertor. For portrait purposes, I find it works well for me, and also
I then have virtually two different lenses...
Skip
- Original Message -
From: "Jaume Lahuerta" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Roberts wrote:
I just bought my first "K" lens,
a 50/1.4, and I must say that I
love the "feel" and heft of it.
It just seems very right on my
K2.
I've never used, or even held, a K50/1.4, but I will soon. I
anticipate a pleasure surge g.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL
Hi Bob,
I should probably correct my statement earlier, "Hmm... Makes you think
that just about anybody could shoot film and get
results with those odds."
In the strictest sense I don't mean that. I actually was thinking more
about myself. If I had the ability to shoot 600 rolls of film in
My first SLR camera was a Russian Zenith 12 XP. It is a screw mount camera
flash sync 1/30 to speed 1/500 and cost me (new) about US$40 in the
late 80's with a 50 mm F 2.8 lens. I don't know if you can find some
but the body if full metal and it is very resistant
Alex
Evan Hanson wrote:
I picked up one of these when I bought the Spotmatic at a local pawnshop
(why a K-mount lens was included with a Spotmatic defies reason). It seems
to be a M lens, (no contacts). Does anyone know whether this lens has a
loud bark or not, or is it a good puppy?
Bill, KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
One kilometer of film is about 26320 frames is about 731 roles (36
exposure) - not counting trailer and leader. I ought to get a couple keepers
out of that.
Professionals are willing to burn a lot of film to get a shot, but tend to
favor just a few film types. Amateurs (artists) give great
Heavy, monstrous, black, deadly looking equipment getting odd looks, that,
anyone can understand... (But who wants to use this awkward stuff? Just to
impress people? I'd rather not get that kind of impression; one gets better
photos without it.)
But, people looking at you differently because
* From: Evan Hanson
* Subject: Help! My kids stole my Pentax (teaching kids photography)
* Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 06:18:14 -0800
Hi Evan,
That's very sweet of your daughter. At around the same age,
I was given by my grand father an SP with 55/1.8 and
135/3.5. Before that, I've got an Olympus Pen, so I had a
little knowledge about photography. I can't forget the
surprise and joy when I first got the SLR!!
I don't know
If you want to spend the money, maybe an Olympus Stylus Epic for $90 each?
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Evan Hanson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 8:08 AM
Subject: Help! My kids stole my Pentax (teaching kids photography)
| While my wife is
Bill I have the f2 version and it is shall we say less then stellar. Wide open
it's not very sharp @ f8 it's reasonably but very sharp in the center. The
edges remain soft throughout the range. Build quality isn't great but it has
withstood some abuse. I find it useful when I'm shooting in
Don't dismiss them out of hand. At various times in the past Sears sold a
variety of rebadged lenses made by various manufacturers, many were Chinon
and Ricoh sourced K-Mount lenses andof varying quality. The only real way
to tell is to shoot a roll of pics and see if you like them... If the
on 3/9/01 5:57 AM, mike wilson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paal wrote:
"The MZ-S costed USD 20 000 000 to develop."
Nobody seems to have picked up on this. ~14,000,000 in real
money. Is this a reasonable, or even realistic, figure? From
an existing company, even in a high cost country
From Skip
Ok;
Here's what I consider a perfect mini system for me:
(All K-mounts---)
a 24mm fast WA lens. (still in process)
a 50mm f1.4 (have: the excellent Pentax FA version)
a moderate tele zoom (have: a great Pentax 75-150mm f4 M)
a good 2x convertor. (have: a good Tamron 2x)
And oh,
"Alexandre A. P. Suaide" wrote:
I didn't mean It will sell fine. I was just saying that
it is not difficult to build a digital back for a film
camera I am sure it will not sell well but we can
dream about a world where money is not so important ... :)
I presume you are aware of the
Aaron Reynolds (and Chris in a similar way) wrote:
What features does the MZ-S lack, in your opinion, making it not
worth the price and not a pro-level camera and not a worthy
successor to the PZ-1? ... Help us out, and heck, help Pentax
out: tell us all what the camera is missing that
Alan Chan wrote:
Every single list member who has handled the MZ-S has said they
liked it and thought it was worth the money. So far, two have
But to be fair, everyone on this list is Penrax user. The opinion is not
entirely objective.
Mayme not. But they are probably pretty much
Shel wrote:
For example, the K135/2.5 just feels so
much more comfortable than the M135/3.5, while the M150/3.5 feels
almost perfect.
Yes, the K135/2.5 is a joy. It has become one of my most frequently used lenses. I
used it to snag portraits in a crowd a couple of weeks ago with considerable
I second Shel's praise for the 24/2.8K. When I started out building my set
of primes, I told myself, 'Each must be an A...hold out for an A." But my
local dealer had the 24/2.8K for $130, and back in Spring 1999 I had far
fewer Web URLs to find affordable As (a paradox?) So I bought the K.
The
If you mean the cheapo plastic thingie that comes off and is usually
missing from used Super Programs, I think they're constantly stocked by BH
and Cameta Camera (Bill Cameta, that is). Price is about $14, I think,
The ME Winder II makes for an excellent, if heavy, grip, and dampens
vibration,
"S", definitely the S. I've used a 1.4 and 2 on my A*300F4 for 16 years now- great
lens.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/09 2:11 AM
Hi,
which teleconverter should I use with the A* 300mm f/4 lens, the S or L
version?
What is difference between the T6-2x converter and the othe 2x converters?
bye,
The is one well known Sears lens, a 135mm that had a true macro feature,
otherwise they are all just average 3rd party lenses.
At 02:13 PM 3/9/01 +0800, you wrote:
Hi
A friend want to sell me several old manual lenses (K-mount). Two of which
are "Sears" lenses. I have no knowledge of this
If you mean the front, one-screw and pins grip, me also. I missed out on an auction on
Ebay recently. I think the two of them went for ~$17 each.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/08 9:57 PM
Hi,
I'm after a grip for a SuperProgram or Super A. If any one has one or know
any leads on one.
Thanks
-
This
I was browsing their website a few days ago and saw an FA 28-70 f4 listed
as "Ugly" for $49. I figured that a functional one was worth at least that,
so I ordered it. It showed up today, and other than the fact it has no
caps, the only thing that makes it differ from the NIB one I already have
Hi all,
From the reference of Pentax lens catalogue, A1.4 and 2x-L
fits the telephoto lenses of 200 or longer focal length,
except for FA*300/4.5, A*200/2.8, FA*400/5.6, FA*Macro200/4,
and reflex lenses. As to the zooms, L will only fit
FA*250-600/5.6.
A1.4x-S will fit the lenses of 320 or
Pl Jensen wrote:
This is nonsense. ... When we actually cited the EOS3/F100
comparison from magazines you accused people of being selective
and again projecting wishful thinking or whatever. I don't get
this; first the rumor mill says it cost F100 money. Then the
enginner says the same
Yeah, Mint+ is better than brand new. I've seen some Kiev stuff
touted as better than brand new because Kiev USA does some
modifications to the cameras that makes them better than new.
Their words, not mine. But I don't think that could apply here.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From:
Shel,
I'm embarrassed to say that I have not yet shot any photos with my Sigma
28/1.8 or Pentax SMC 28/2. I don't like to use a lens until I've equipped
it with a hood, a UV filter, and a lens cap that works with the hood and
filter. I've struck out with these two lenses. On each, I've fitted a
Shel,
Thanks for your affirming remarks!
I will take your advice and hold onto the 85/2M. I had a fear that I'd
regret selling it, and you've confirmed why.
Paul Franklin Stregevsky,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: (703) 834-4648
H: (301) 349-5243
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
I always thought condensors would give more contrasty,
granier and therefore apparently sharper images. Was
ou B22 properly aligned? Did you use the same lens?
The sharper more contrasty result might be due to a
new lens. I noticed this when traded my El Omegar for
a multicoated Nikor. It's a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Example-- at ASA 200, the light meter jumps(fast) to positive when
the shutter is set at 1 second. Similarly, the meter jumps positive
at 1/15 sec with ASA 3200.
Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, this has nothing to do with the film speed and and
Isn't "New In Box" regarded as Mint+ ?
--
John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Silicon Graphics, Inc.
(650)933-82952011 N. Shoreline Blvd.
MS 43U-991
(650)932-0828 (Fax) Mountain View, CA 94043-1389
Hello. My name is Darth Vader. I am
Sounds like it. With the K-mount the lens is normally stopped down to the
aperture set on the ring on the camera. The small lever (the one closest
to the lens release button on the camera) is used to hold the lens open
while on the camera for viewing/etc. A totally different lever, near the
You all wrote:
[ sarcastic mode on
Wow, mint+. That's better than new. Like I said, wow. What
are we on ebay now?
sarcastic mode off
--Tom ]
***
Tom,
Try not to be such an ass. If you aren't interested then just pass by. The
world really doesn't need any more
What you are observing is the built-in warning that the meter has been set
outside the range that it is capable of working. This changes as the ASA is
changed and the boundaries you mentioned sound about right.
Although not the same camera, the Spotmatic and Spotmatic II have the same
feature;
- MX...113
- ME Super.104
- ME Super SE3
=107
- LX...107
Things are not looking so good for the LX, it's tied with the ME Super...
Oh, now that was mean, Todd.
-Aaron
Don't look at me, I don't have any ME
Let's not forget that the MZS is just a byproduct of
the development of a digital SLR camera body. In my
opinion, hte MZS looks much more with everything
Pentax has already done thant the PZ1. Don't get me
wrong I have a PZ1 and simply love the interface. But
it's bulky and clearly have more of a
I would say this would be the best third party standard zoom around.
Solid Built. Sharp.
do a search under http://www.photozone.de/
under pentax compatible, f2.8, standard zooms.
I still like the AT-X better than the AT-X II.
and who said it isnt a Pro Lens?
At 06:53 PM 3/8/2001 +0900, you
Herbet opined:
I always thought condensors would give more contrasty,
granier and therefore apparently sharper images.
So did I. And the condenser prints do seem grainier. The relative contrast is
impossible to judge because of the differences in light color and the use of variable
contrast
Don't look at me, I don't have any ME Supers. Oh well, it's still my fault
for not having an LX, right?
You catch on fast. ;)
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
Ralf wrote:
Wrong. It was said half a year ago that the new camera has now an
order number for the distributors and will cost 2-2.5x the MZ-5N
price, and will definitively not be the flagship (you, Boz etc.).
Sure. I still holds true. It was also said that price estimate was most likely
Hi,
We have not yet talked about the opposite side of the coin, which is that,
the more you shoot of a given subject, the more difficult it is to edit down
to the best shot.
on rare occasions when I'm in such an enviable position I get other
people to help me :o) I'm a hopeless editor of my
Is the list having a hiccup? I'm suddenly re-receiving messages from
Monday and Tuesday.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Yes, I've received list-barf too.
tv
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Is the list having a hiccup? I'm suddenly re-receiving messages from
Monday and Tuesday.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
Pentax does not
produce enlarger lens :)
The various 50mm f/4 macros can be used as an enlarger lenses.
ppro
-Original Message-
From: herbet brasileiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 1:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: first cold head results
I
It's hard to say, as Sears lenses are rebadges that came from different
manufacturers at different times, so the same lens (say 135mm F2.8) may
vary a lot between samples. I know the lenses were probably made by
Albinar, Ricoh, and Chinon - and likely others. There is a 135mm F2.8 lens
with a
On 9 Mar 2001, at 19:25, Hardwick Charles NF-III 17 SPTG/SVYR wrote:
- delete -
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
I just did an e-mail run and received about 50 messages from earlier
this week -- Mon., Tues., Wed. Ones I have seen before.
This happen to anyone else?
Bob
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget
Evan Hanson wrote:
Does anyone know the absolutely cheapest screw mount or k mount
35 mm slr ever produced. New or used I'm basically looking for
something that I would feel comfortable letting the kids use all of the
time. I figure I could attach some dirt cheap lenses like the famous
Sears 50
HY
FA28-80/4 is an excellent choise.
An M 2.0/85mm or M 135/2.5 (very good) or A 135mm/2.8 could be good
afforable alternatives (100-250$).
Any lens could be a portrait lens, but 85-135mm lenses gives you comfertable
distance to the model as well as short DOF.
Jens
-
This message is from the
Flamed? Why? Your guess is as good as anyone else's and so is
your logic. I intend to get my hands on an MZ-S and see how I like
it. This may mean I'll buy one and trade it off later if I don't
like it. So far, I haven't read anything that would make me want to
trade it off, but you never
Take a look for a Ricoh, Chinon, Sears, or older Vivitar camera. These 3rd
party cameras usually con be found for pretty cheap. Any automatic only
camera typically don't go for much either, such as many of the Sears and
the Pentax MV, MG, and A3000. Another one to take a look for is the
Paul Provencher wrote:
A quick check of this chart actually confirms exactly what you
described. When the shutter speed/ASA combination are set
outside the limits shown on the chart, the needle deflects to
indicate this fact. So it sounds like your camera is working right.
Hi Brent,
Yeah --
yes, yes, yes :-) :-) :-)
What's happening ?
Doug?
Regards
Martin
-Original Message-
From: Robert Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, March 09, 2001 4:59 PM
Subject: Repeat messages?
I just did an e-mail run and received about 50 messages
Incidentally, the cheapest U.S. source for a new Zenitar 16/2.8 fisheye is
probably where I recently bought mine: Russia2All in Utah. Cost: $139 plus
$7.50 shipping! They also have the most sensibly designed order form I've
ever seen.
URL: http://www.russia2all.com/cameras/35mm/ZenitarK28-16.htm
I guess since the Sears 50/1.7 was thrown in with the Spotmatic and now
(in)famous Rexatar 300/4.0, all for $150.00 I can't really complain.
Bill, KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
I basically "stole" my dad's Pentax HV something when I was 12. He had
a Rollie TLR and some other range finder 35 he brought back from Europe
after WWII and were beginning to rust out but the Pentax was his first
SLR. We were stationed overseas in the Philippine Islands. I
absolutely
YES!
At 02:58 PM 03/09/2001 -0500, you wrote:
I just did an e-mail run and received about 50 messages from earlier
this week -- Mon., Tues., Wed. Ones I have seen before.
This happen to anyone else?
Bob
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Hi Paul,
Would you happen to know the minimum focus for your Yivitar 28/Close Focus
and max magnification?
Thanks,
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As luck would have it, I own a Kiron 28/2.0 in K-mount and am looking to
sell it. I'm drowning in manual-focus fast 28s: Sigma 28/1.8, Vivitar
Series 1
The ZX-5n front is made of a leatherette, as we all know. I'm wondering
what the material on the front of the MZ-s is made of. Rubberized stuff?
DG
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Gary L. Murphy wrote:
Would you be willing to sell this lens by itself? If so, what are you asking?
Gary,
I was planning to offer the whole set on the list if my friend doesn't
want it (he'll think about it over the weekend). Just to avoid hassle
with multiple shippings,
Say, I emailed them and still haven't gotten a response. Do you know if
that includes the kit with case, caps, and 4 filters?
Todd
At 03:24 PM 3/9/01 -0500, you wrote:
Incidentally, the cheapest U.S. source for a new Zenitar 16/2.8 fisheye is
probably where I recently bought mine: Russia2All
It would be telling to group the results by class of camera. How popular
are the M models? the Ks? the As? How many users are using cameras that
offer manual-exposure-only? That sort of thing.
When you look only at individual models, it's too easy to overlook the
success of the group it
The M135/3.5 is not a bad lens at all. I had two of them. Consider you have
70mm, I think 135mm should do well.
regards,
Alan Chan
I am thinking on a lens that helps my in enhancing my,
really limited, portrait skills.
It seems that the best focal ranges are between 80 and
150mm so I imagine
But to be fair, everyone on this list is Penrax user. The opinion is not
entirely objective.
Mayme not. But they are probably pretty much representative of the
prospective purchaser of the MZ-S; I doubt if too many will be sold
to people who don't already own Pentax gear unless Pentax
Unfortunately I see little chances that Pentax can lower the price.
That's a volume question. Technical updates on the other side are
difficult or impossible due to the small body. So we have to live
with the situation that Pentax has released a camera targeted
direct at the Pentax fan, a camera
Yep, this would make it especially interesting to those of us who dislike
Minota intensely. Pentax has, and always has had, a different design
philosophy than most other camera manufactures, and I, for one, like it
that
way.
I quite like the Minolta 9 indeed, just that they have dumped and
Hi there,
I just got e-mails back from Intenscreen that the Z1p
will most likely need some meter calibration if I were
to install a Beattie Intenscreen in the camera.
What they were not able to tell me was if the Z1 and the
Z1p used the same focussing screen- the beattie screens are
made for
A1.4x-S will fit the lenses of 320 or shorter focal length,
except for FA*200/2.8, FA*300/4.5, FA*250-600/5.6, A15/3.5,
A*Macro200/4, bellows, and shift. It will also fit
FA*400/5.6
A2x-S will fit all the lenses except for A15/3.5, A*1200/8,
FA*600/4, bellows and shift.
That contradicts the
Alan Chan wrote:
Maybe not. But they are probably pretty much representative of the
prospective purchaser of the MZ-S; I doubt if too many will be sold
to people who don't already own Pentax gear unless Pentax suddenly
come up with a marketing strategy.
You mean like...buy one get one
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001 15:36:48 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What they were not able to tell me was if the Z1 and the
Z1p used the same focussing screen- the beattie screens are
made for the Z1. Are they the same?
Nope. The Z1P has a 1EV brighter screen than the Z1
Later,
Gary
-
This
I just did an e-mail run and received about 50 messages from earlier
this week -- Mon., Tues., Wed. Ones I have seen before.
This happen to anyone else?
Bob
-
Yes, hundreds! I haven't had a chance to read most of the originals ye, so
I've just got done marking everything 'read' and filing it
Ralf wrote:
So we have the MZ-S now.
It's $1100. MZ-5N is $350 and fits a special group of customers. It
might go on as it is for quite a while.
So what about Pentax introducing an advanced camera on basis of the
MZ-7, at around $600?
It could be this way:
- MZ-7, minus illuminated
The best to you and your daughter.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/06 7:08 AM
Good luck Mafud and congratulations on
the marriage of your daughter.
Evan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good-bye all.
For the next two months or so, I'll be off the PDML list.
I'm marrying off my youngest (33) ( #5 of 5)
Hi Mike
This is by far (imho) one of the most articulate queries I've seen posted to
this group and am looking forward to following the ensuing thread. I think
the subject is of great interest to many of us.
Don
- Original Message -
From: "mike ray" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
You can find a K-1000 with SMC-M 50mm f/2
lens for under $100 on eBay if you watch the prices and bid at the last minute.
I bought one in excellent condition for $90 a few months ago, and I wouldn't
hesitate letting any of my three older grandchildren (ages 6, 9, and 11) take a
picture with
I like sarcasm.
Regards,
Bob...
Give blood. Play hockey.
- Original Message -
From: "Hardwick Charles NF-III 17 SPTG/SVYR"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 11:25 AM
Subject: Don't be such an ass
You all wrote:
[ sarcastic mode on
Wow, mint+.
Hi, Troops.
It appears that a server in the pipeline has developed a glitch in its (cough)
microsoft-designed software that ran some messages back into majordomo. I'm not yet
sure how it's done it, but I'm still working on it. I've identified the domain, and I
think I've got the user account
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
