No, I make unsharp masking in Photoshop, not in camera.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 2:24 AM
Subject: Re: I got my *ist D and I LOVE IT !!!
Have you changed the sharpness in the camera to maximum
Is the optical formula of Takumar 500/4,5 the same as SMC
PENTAX 1:4.5/500?
http://digilander.libero.it/aohc/tak05e.htm says 4 elements in
4 groups for Tak and so does
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/primes/extreme-
tele/K500f4.5.html for K 500. But is the optical design the
same? If not,
It's the amount of data the camera can handle before it has to write
some of it to the Flash memory. You take one shot at a time and buffer
size isn't relevant but take 6 quick ones and you'll see why it's an
issue...
Right. I should have asked What is the size of the buffer?
Thanks,
Joe
I am user of MZ5n. This weekend while doing landscape
photography, camera kept on hunting and was not able
to use AF. I was using 100mm lens.
I too feel I need better AF and *ist is a good choice.
But I will wait till the next generation of *ist. Next
generation of *ist may have good viewfinder,
Try it by increasing the sharpness level in the camera. It seems to work
okay for me, and all you've got to lose is a little bit of battery charge.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Dario Bonazza 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 10:08 AM
Subject:
Pål wrote:
PJ Large volume
PJ DSLR is apparently limited for future Pentax DSLR's. My guess is
PJ that the *ist D is a loss leader like all DSLR's and that Pentax
PJ currently are not willing to buy market share. The *istD function
PJ is probably only to make Pentax present in the DSLR field.
Makes you wonder if sooner or later they will probably be driven by a
linear or USM motor, with some type of feedback, like a shaft encoder or
similar. This would make it extremely precise and consistent. It might
actually be cheaper than a mechanical linkage, but it would necessitate
a
A 1993 model Saturn? Which one?
That was pretty early in the Saturn line.
Nevertheless, a brand new line of cars, and a manual transmission lasts
for over 230,000 miles, well that is pretty good, all by itself.
An average of 23,000 miles a year is pretty high milage.
Sounds to me like you got a
Here's a question. There is also noise reduction ala Neat Image. What
would you apply first, the noise reduction or sharpening? They somewhat
act against each other, but they are both useful.
Dario Bonazza 2 wrote:
Jostein,
I always apply USM at 100% magnification.
However, should you
It depends on what scenic is for you. There's a little of everything here.
What are you looking for?
BR
From: arnie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
p.s. I have a few days off now, anyone know of some scenic places to take
pictures around NYC?
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 13 Oct 2003 at 11:54, Robert Gonzalez wrote:
Me and another guy here thought of this very thing as a viable
alternative to manufacturer software. Create open source based
on-camera and off-camera software that completely blows the socks off
the typical offerings. It
At 01:41 AM 10/14/03, you wrote:
Given the above info, is there any way that the back of a K mount lens
could be modified to let the *ist D fire using stop down metering in
similar modes?
snip
I suspect that more people would complain about the loss of full-
aperture
John, have you got a web site? Fast cars fast cars fast cars fast cars *~*
I get my track access from motorsport.com, so most of my stuff goes there.
I've got a few older shots up at my home page http://www.panix.com/~johnf/,
and I've recently been given some space on a system operated by a
Hi,
Tuesday, October 14, 2003, 10:25:28 AM, you wrote:
On 13/10/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
[Have you heard the term for that activity? It's known as 'chimping';
folks staring at their camera dispay anf going Oooh! Oooh! Oooh!]
ROTFLMAO!
That is hilarious! I see it all the time. Is
Openapeture3 metering nad AE with K/M lenses is a very
desireable and cheap feature to implement nad Pentax has
neglected that for dubious reasons...
J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jcoconnell.com
On 14/10/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
p.s. I have a few days off now, anyone know of some scenic places to take
pictures around NYC?
You've got to be kidding, right?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
Shucks Cotty, I didn't even need to do the test. I've printed numerous
photos using large, fine jpg and am quite pleased with the results, at least
up to 8.5x11. I must admit thought, that I use the P.I.M. plug-in in
Photoshop 7 so that I'm printing exactly what the camera saw.
Bill
-
one feature i would like to see in a digital camera is a portrait mode that
would rotate the orientation of the sensor in the camera without rotating
the camera.
Why? It's an extra mechanical thing that could go wrong, and one which affects
the most critical element in the camera - the
DOF does not have much to do with the size of the Circle of Confusion
(COC) on the film or sensor unless you only look at contact prints.
Normally DOF is based on an 8x10 print viewed at 10 inches.
When you reduce the formulas to their basics the only things that matter
is COC in the final
- Original Message -
From: Dario Bonazza 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, should you apply USM to *ist D pictures, they can only look sharp
at less than 100% magnification.
If you apply lesser USM, they don't look sharp even at 50% magnification,
while if you apply enough USM for
On 14/10/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
p.s. chimps, like us, are apes, not monkeys.
You speak for yourself, mate ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Free UK Mac Ads www.macads.co.uk
Then, I´ve got a problem. This is the one lens I´ve been considering
to buy together with an *istD (and a 16-45), as my Vivitar 2x macro
converter is the only K-mount I use regularly.
Have anybody tested any other macros?
DagT
På tirsdag, 14. oktober 2003, kl. 19:05, Jostein:
The biggest
Do you really do a lot of macro wide open though?
I find I have to stop down quite a lot to get any kind of depth of field
anyway, so this would not be a killer. Not nice though!
You could always get the Sigma 105 which is nice, or someone else
(tamron?) makes a good 90 I think. I always
Hi everybody,
I just checked the Italian importer website.
The list price of the *IstD is Euro 2299 (roughly US$ 2700).
Needless to say I'm not exactly happy about that...
Ciao,
Gianfranco
=
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved
Hi folks,
I am on holiday in Greece and have shot 2 Kodak T-MAX 400 (@800, if it
makes any difference). I would like to develop them in my favourite lab
(Ilfords in the UK) but I am worried about X-ray machines and
metal-detector arches etc.
Do you see any problem? Would you fly with them back
What do you know ... eBay have come back to me requesting more information
and I gave it to them pronto!
Don
___
Dr E D F Williams
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
See New Pages The Cement Company from HELL!
Updated: August 15, 2003
-
Hi,
Tuesday, October 14, 2003, 10:25:28 AM, you wrote:
Phillip Jones Griffiths (how come everybody in this email has 3
names?) commented scathingly on this once at a talk I went to. Said
photographers were missing a lot of shots doing this.
--
How much duty is charged on cameras imported to Italy? You can buy the *istD
here in Vancovuer for CDN$2199 (about USD$1640) without even bargaining very
hard. You could have it shipped with insurance; unless duty is exceedingly
high, you'd save a bundle.
I will put you in touch with the
Yes I do, as I like the shallow DOF. See this month PUG (and maybe
next month).
I have heard some nice things about both the Sigma and the Tamron. I
even had an offer to buy the Tamron 90mm, but wanted a Pentax instead
:-(
DagT
På tirsdag, 14. oktober 2003, kl. 19:25, skrev Rob Brigham:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tuesday, October 14, 2003, 10:25:28 AM, you wrote:
Phillip Jones Griffiths (how come everybody in this email has 3
names?) commented scathingly on this once at a talk I went to. Said
photographers were missing a lot of shots doing this.
Several of the equine
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How much duty is charged on cameras imported to Italy? You
can buy the *istD
here in Vancovuer for CDN$2199 (about USD$1640) without even
bargaining very
hard. You could have it shipped with insurance; unless duty
is exceedingly
high, you'd save a bundle.
Alex wrote:
What suggests to me that your method is wrong is that it would give
me a narrower depth of field than 35mm (using an equivelent lens).
I know from practice (using a prosumer digital camera with a 1 2/3
sensor) that this isn't the case.
Alex, we are discussing using lenses
I way I interpreted the photo.net explanation it sounds like the
magnification factor has an effect on the DOF. Since it takes more
magnification for a smaller sensor to fill the 8x10, the DOF will be
different. In what you are saying, it sounds like M, the magnification
factor is effectively
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Boris
Liberman) wrote:
John, please consider IrfanView (www.irfanvew.com). It can do batch
processing which include batch rotation, resizing, format conversion
and so on. It is freeware.
Thanks, but while it looks like a good bit of
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (alex
wetmore) wrote:
I hope that Pentax offers a DA long zoom. I have my eye out for
something like a 100-300. A DA 100~300 could be be faster than
the current FAJ 75-300 while remaining about the same size and
weight. A 50-200 would be
I am on holiday in Greece and have shot 2 Kodak T-MAX 400 (@800, if it
makes any difference). I would like to develop them in my favourite lab
(Ilfords in the UK) but I am worried about X-ray machines and
metal-detector arches etc.
Metal detectors are harmless for film. Carry them in your
Dont check them!! The X-ray machines used in the baggage handling area
are *MUCH* more powerful, and will fog your film big time. Its better
to go through the walk through. If you carry them separate, they
usually will give you the courtesy of not passing them through the
smaller X-ray
Demand a hand check. I've never had a problem doing that.
Put them in your pockets and the metal thingies are going to set off the
detector anyway.
Quoting John Dallman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am on holiday in Greece and have shot 2 Kodak T-MAX 400 (@800, if it
makes any difference). I
Hi Kostas,
exposed film does travel just fine. You have to take some precautions
though.
First, never ~ I mean never put it in check-in luggage (great
description :) ~ since Xray machines for that use much greater
radiation dose and film gets easily damaged there, especially if it
goes
Flawless condition functionally and cosmetically. Look like new.
No marks any where. Clean inside out. I'm giving up my ME-super,
so don't need the winder any more.
The winder works with ME, ME-super and SuperProgram and Super-A,
except the latter ones also have their own dedicated winder.
I
-Original Message-
From: John Francis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I got quite a surprise when I used a Canon EOS-10d a few
months ago; when I
copied the files onto my computer (using the same software
I already had there
for my Canon G1 - full marks, Canon!) it automatically
Hello all
Does this list cover all things Pentax, including the old K1000?
If so, I'll get my questions ready.
If not, would someone be good enough to direct me to a more appropriate list?
Thanks in advance.
Mike
Our case is No.2, since the discussion was about having a lesser depth of
field when using a 24mm lens on the *ist D, compared to using the same 24mm
lens on 35mm format (from same distance and with different cropping due to
different sensor size).
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Robert
I am on holiday in Greece and have shot 2 Kodak T-MAX 400 (@800, if it
makes any difference). I would like to develop them in my favourite lab
(Ilfords in the UK) but I am worried about X-ray machines and
metal-detector arches etc.
Do you see any problem? Would you fly with them back to
John Dallman wrote:
I am on holiday in Greece and have shot 2 Kodak T-MAX 400 (@800, if it
makes any difference). I would like to develop them in my favourite lab
(Ilfords in the UK) but I am worried about X-ray machines and
metal-detector arches etc.
Metal detectors are harmless
Italian import taxes are as follows (regardless new or used items):
20% VAT
4% customs duties
a few euros for extra costs I don't know remember.
So the due total is around 25% of item+shipping (yes, those taxes are
calculated on shipping costs too).
And don't forget the shipping cost itself, to
You can't beat the laboratory method. I will be interested in seing your
results, which should be a genuine education.
Quoting Dario Bonazza 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, I'm going to publish comparison pictures somewhere and I'll acknowledge
you.
If I'll conclude that the *ist D is
Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this list cover all things Pentax, including the old K1000?
Oh my goodness, yes!
If so, I'll get my questions ready.
Go ahead. We need some diversion from aLl the DSLR griping!
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I fiddled a bit with the *D yesterday, and got some TIFs with me back
home.
Not the camera, alas... Today I bought a card reader so I could upload my
test images to the 'puter.
I made two shots with the FA100/2.8 macro lens, and
I would highly recommed you go for the MZ-M screen. I am not fond of the
Beattie screen which I had 2 for LX in the past. If you can't focus with the
standard Z-1 screen, I don't think any plain screen will help. The problem
with the Z-1 viewfinder is the uncoated plastic eyepiece, not the
Dear *istD users,
I have a question about *istD, hope somebody can clear
it.
When you pick a focus point, does SPOT meter area also
change?
No.
I think camera must be recording info like aperture
shutter speed.
Does camera record information about focus point used
for that
Hi All,
I'm currently doing a course in wedding photography. One of the things that
came up and which I forgot to ask was: we were told that the studio lights
had been set for f/11 and that we should set our cameras to f/8, why is this
so?
Thanks,
Feroze
Hey, Bucky,
I'm getting real confused here - but hell, with all the share transfers, and
rebadged autos that have sold all over, who can keep track?
Someone else, off list, reminded me that the Geo Storm was an Isuzu. IIRC,
Geo was going to be GM's import or Japanese division. Didn't the
Comments inline:
Robert Gonzalez wrote:
I way I interpreted the photo.net explanation it sounds like the
magnification factor has an effect on the DOF. Since it takes more
magnification for a smaller sensor to fill the 8x10, the DOF will be
different. In what you are saying, it sounds like
Hi,
Jostein wrote:
... and here's the link.
http://home.online.no/~jooksne/istd_aberr.htm
There also seems to be some blue fringing on the vertical part of the
railing, where it contrasts with the white foam of the stream. This is
also visible on the top of the lower horizontal rail.
mike
- Original Message -
From: Feroze Kistan
Subject: correct exposure
Hi All,
I'm currently doing a course in wedding photography. One of the things
that
came up and which I forgot to ask was: we were told that the studio lights
had been set for f/11 and that we should set our
- Original Message -
From: Alin Flaider
Subject: Re: Whats up with the *ist D? (WAS: feature for digital camera)
Pål wrote:
PJ Large volume
PJ DSLR is apparently limited for future Pentax DSLR's. My guess is
PJ that the *ist D is a loss leader like all DSLR's and that Pentax
PJ
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Re: I got my *ist D and I LOVE IT !!!
http://home.online.no/~jooksne/istd_aberr.htm
There also seems to be some blue fringing on the vertical part of the
railing, where it contrasts with the white foam of the stream. This is
also
Brendan, quit dicking around with the new guy!
Mike, as you already know from several other posts, there are many K1000
lovers here. I'm not one of them. Not 'cause I don't like them, just
because I don't own one. But, many of us do, and I'm sure they'll be
pleased to share their knowledge.
Some of my posts are not making it to my copy of the digest, and yet
other people are responding to them, so they are obviously getting
them, perhaps only in individual emails. I sent out 3 tests yesterday,
and none of them went through. I am sending them to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Should I only
Hi,
From: arnie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
p.s. I have a few days off now, anyone know of some scenic places to take
pictures around NYC?
photograph the places on the Monopoly board, and have a drink in a
hotel on every street!
--
Cheers,
Bobmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually, it has one gear...
But, seriously, Cotty (okay, I'm never serious...) as I've grown older, I've
come to appreciate that simple, well executed designs often work as well, or
better, than more complex designs.
Yes, they sometimes require more work, but one is then rewarded with the
Hey, Tom,
You got that straight! Complicated stuff makes my brain hurt. vbg
Hey, it looks very much like, with the help of a certain Mr. Owens, I'm
about to register for GFM!!
Woo-Hoo! See ya'll there!
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
On 14/10/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Sounds like you need to take a trip to NA and buy one here. Grandfather
Mountain perhaps?
The place will be awash with *ist D's !
I intend to bring along most of my stuff - I'll be metering the scene
with the digi and exposing some 'film' I believe
On Tuesday, October 14, 2003, at 06:42 PM, Cameron Hood wrote:
Some of my posts are not making it to my copy of the digest, and yet
other people are responding to them, so they are obviously getting
them, perhaps only in individual emails. I sent out 3 tests yesterday,
and none of them went
http://www.ephotozine.com/equipment/tests/testdetail.cfm?test_id=267
The reviews are coming slow, but they'll get here in the end!
I don't know. I usually set my meter to overexpose my print film that I use
for a wedding. Underexposing is bad.
Jim A.
From: Feroze Kistan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Angel Art
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 23:52:24 +0200
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Ignore that, I just realised I read that one ages ago!
-Original Message-
From: Rob Brigham
Sent: 14 October 2003 23:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Another *istD Review...
http://www.ephotozine.com/equipment/tests/testdetail.cfm?test_id=267
The reviews are coming slow,
Thank You,
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 12:30 AM
Subject: Re: correct exposure
- Original Message -
From: Feroze Kistan
Subject: correct exposure
Hi All,
I'm currently doing a
And I plan on having a printer to print some of these digi files.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 6:54 PM
Subject: Re: *IstD price in Italy
On 14/10/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Sounds
I've made very good friends with my lab owner, and since then my photos have
come out much better. I meter expose for the shadows (for the highlights
if I'm using trannies) and theres very little adjustments he has to do,
sometimes he ups the density by a point or 2 and now and then a adds a bit
On 15 Oct 2003 at 0:07, Jostein wrote:
... and here's the link.
http://home.online.no/~jooksne/istd_aberr.htm
Interesting, the halo is much wider than what would likely be produced solely
as an aliasing artifact on the high contrast boarder. It looks like it may be a
combination of adjacent
isnt that one of the custom function you can set?
(checking manual)
yes it seems to be CF3. unless i'm confused - this is the custom functions
spec
http://www.pentaxusa.com/docstore/file_save.cfm?thispath=cat%5F197%5Cfile=ist%20Custom%20Functions%2Epdfapp_id=1
arnie
- Original Message -
Aww man :-(
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: Brendan, quit dicking around with the new
guy!
Mike, as you already know from several other posts,
there are many K1000
lovers here. I'm not one of them. Not 'cause I
don't like them, just
because I don't own one. But, many of
Right, I have done this test (http://www.calcot.plus.com/RAWTest/)
I found no obvious difference between the original RAW and JPG images,
so for the rest of the test I used a jpg created from the RAW file with
no adjustments whatsoever, so that I know the two methods have exactly
the same start
You will enjoy it.
Did you guys know that they claim the Appalachians are the oldest
mountains in the world. They say they averaged 25,000 feet when they
were young and now are worn down to mostly less than 6,000.
Not very good fall photography here this year as the leaves are green
one day,
On 15 Oct 2003 at 0:59, Rob Brigham wrote:
Seeing the full size files, this is clear cut for me. Jpg is not a
problem from a compression point of view, but creating the jpgs from the
camera is throwing away some of the information from the image capture
which can never be recovered. If you
I use Windows 98 SE and want to continue using it. According to the BH
web site, that is just fine for the *Ist D. Pentax's web site says, no,
you gotta have ME, 2000, or XP.
Which is it?
Thanks,
Joe
Oy! Looking for natural stuff in NYC is like going to the Grand Canyon to
take pictures of kids playing stick ball in the gutter...
Here goes: There's Cental Park in Manhattan and Prospect Park in Brooklyn,
along with the Brooklyn and Bronx Botanic Gardens anda patch of grass in my
back yard. The
There was a question a few days ago about flash diffusers for Pentax
flashes. Apparently one option is a generic diffuser that attaches via
velcro. Some users don't care for that solution.
I have just learned that Adorama markets a white nylon sock that slips
over a flash and is held on by
a DSLR is the most accurate light meter an average photographer will ever
get their hands on. white balance can be fixed trivially after the fact when
shooting in RAW mode. it makes the same adjustment as the camera does on the
fly or with higher precision, depending on your preferences.
Herb
Mishka,
I have had experience with the gitzo, (not a cf) and
decided to try the Slik 813 cf. I have used it for
about 3 years and the head mounting insert that fits
inside the top of the center column became loose after
working with a 5x7 view camera. I fixed it with
gorilla glue and have had no
Because weddings have so much energy the over expose everything by one stop?
If the light meter says f11 shoot at f11.
BR
From: Feroze Kistan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm currently doing a course in wedding photography. One of the things that
came up and which I forgot to ask was: we were told that
I'd say as long as you can attach USB mass storage devices, you're okay.
I can't imagine using photoshop on Win98 though...
-Ryan
Joseph Tainter wrote:
I use Windows 98 SE and want to continue using it. According to the
BH web site, that is just fine for the *Ist D. Pentax's web site
says,
- Original Message -
From: Sean Spencer
Subject: pentax optio 550
forgive me if this is a stupid question, but I am a novice.
I have a Pentax Optio 550 and I am wondering if it possible to use it as a
webcam?
I would apppreciate any help
What does the instruction manual say on
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: RE: Has Pentax missed again?
The FA*24 and 77ltd
don't give me an fov that suits me ibn the ist either - and they are my
fave lenses *sigh*
Disappointing isn't it.
Something that is really dissapointing, my 77 doesn't have that
Hi!
I have added a male lion to my nature Portraits page. It's a series of zoo
portraits that I've been working on over the past month or two. I've
mentioned
it a few times on the PUG with a link to the site but have got very little
response at all.
here's a link to the site
I stand by my reply. His post makes no sense.
You cant really do studio strobes at weddings
and receptions. His teachers must be the
stupid jerks.
J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jcoconnell.com
The digital gear is great for all those photographic exploits where
convenience and speed is far more important than absolute quality.
My aim is to continue shooting MF film for as long as I can and all smaller
format work will be digital. Of course I'd be putting film through my
classic
35mm
-Original Message-
From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I stand by my reply. His post makes no sense.
You cant really do studio strobes at weddings
and receptions. His teachers must be the
stupid jerks.
Actually, a stupid jerk is someone who does all his formals
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: correct exposure
I stand by my reply. His post makes no sense.
You cant really do studio strobes at weddings
and receptions. His teachers must be the
stupid jerks.
Geeze, you've just told every wedding photographer over
On Tuesday, October 14, 2003, at 05:52 PM, Feroze Kistan wrote:
Hi All,
I'm currently doing a course in wedding photography. One of the things
that
came up and which I forgot to ask was: we were told that the studio
lights
had been set for f/11 and that we should set our cameras to f/8, why
On 15 Oct 2003 at 1:04, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Problem with that thinking is that digital has already matched/beaten
medium format film in most the cameras in terms of grain/noise and the latest
10-14 Mpixels models are giving it a run for the money in terms of
resolution.
Might be beat
I use my studio strobes (alien Bees) for formals at all the weddings I
shoot. I wouldn't want to use a little flash on a bracket for that
kind of stuff.
---
Bruce
Tuesday, October 14, 2003, 10:00:17 PM, you wrote:
JCOC I stand by my reply. His post makes no sense.
JCOC You cant really do
-Original Message-
From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I stand by my reply. His post makes no sense.
You cant really do studio strobes at weddings
and receptions. His teachers must be the
stupid jerks.
Actually, a stupid jerk is someone who does all his
Hi Team,
Anyone have an idea of ball-park pricing for a used SMCP FA 28-80 3.5-4.7 Power
Zoom lens?
TIA,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
I knew I had an example somewhere!
This is a shot I took at Goodwood a couple of years ago.
http://www.panix.com/~johnf/temp/airshow.jpg
I was using an MZ-S with the A* 300/f2.8, quite probably
with the AF 1.7 adapter. I started off trying to use a
monopod, but soon gave that up.
I believe
OK, these two links, among others at that wonderful Japanese site, show some
flaws that I find very distracting (warning, the pictures are very large):
http://2ch-dc-ita.gotdns.com/~dc-ita/cgi-bin/imgboard/img-box/img20030916184
719.jpg
98 matches
Mail list logo
