-Original Message-
Paul
(A digital purchaser who believes film will outlive most of us on
this
forum.)
I fully agree. I believe film will outlive all of us. Not dozens of
different emulsions and not available in every store but there will
be film for a very long time. If Kodak
Cool, Paul ... the duotone /tritone / quadtone method gives
a lot of control once you get used to the technique. Saving
the tones and setup you like for future use is a great time
saver as well.
shel
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Doh... I figured it out. It was just something I never tried on a
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:05:35 -0800, Jim Apilado wrote:
Sometimes I wonder if those shooting digital would like to see the era of
film end ASAP.
I wouldn't. Digital is not good enough yet to replace film completely.
It will one day, I know that. Unfortunately people are getting used
to
There is a preview on DPreview:
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/nikond70/default.asp
Some incredible specifications:
- continuos mode with 3fps in a burst of up to 144 (!!!) frames
- flash sync 1/500s
- shutter speeds: 30-1/8000s
- 3D color matrix metering with 1,005-pixel RGB sensor
- The
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I think there are some photographers who have an unconscious need to
validate their digital purchase. The demise of film would do just that.
Paul
(A digital purchaser who believes film will outlive most of us on this
forum.)
Thank you Paul. My
Hi!
SB Scanners used will be an Imacon Flextight 626 (I believe
SB that's the number) and the Nikon Coolscan IV 4000dpi unit,
SB if that makes any difference.
Let me add my bits to that. One of my friends used to have the Nikon
scanner you mentioned. Apparently, scanning usual BW negatives was
Hi Boris ...
I've scanned numerous BW negs using the Nikon ... I can
never remember the model number, but it was the top end
model for 35mm film and the results have been fine.
The technobabble dweebs need SOMETHING coming out of their
mouths at all times.
shel
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Of course, it's always possible that I can't tell a good
scan from a poor one, or a good photograph or image from a
poor one.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Boris ...
I've scanned numerous BW negs using the Nikon ... I can
never remember the model number, but it was the top end
model for 35mm
Not to pour cold water on your enthusiasms, but must somewhat disagree
with what have been said about this lens. I have it too but right now
it's one of my most unused lenses, especially since I got a SMCK 24/2.8.
Of course such a lens (the 19) will rarely see an extensive use
anyway...
My
Not to pour cold water on your enthusiasms, but must somewhat disagree
with what have been said about this lens. I have it too but right now
it's one of my most unused lenses, especially since I got a SMCK 24/2.8.
Of course such a lens (the 19) will rarely see an extensive use
anyway...
My
Hi,
But perhaps it would be worth if you forwent (?!) Nikon
Very good! I had to look it up, but 'forwent' is correct. You
could also have 'forego', 'forewent' apparently.
I don't think I've ever seen or heard it used before. Not in a modern
context, anyway.
Most native speakers would probably
On 28/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Hey guys, is that page available in English anywhere?
Hi Tan,
No. But you can download some PDFs from here:
http://grubbel.com/~magnus/eos/
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
Hi!
I looked at this photo once and couldn't make up my mind about the
sink. Then I read some of the comments and returned to the photo. Then
I noticed that both the barber and his customer are of considerable
age. At least for Israel. It is rare to find such a pair in local
barber shops. Hmmm,
On 28/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I don't know, they seem to be selling quite a few *ist-D's in spite of:
1.) The lack of aperture simulator, (yes that has been partially addressed
which makes it more likely I'll buy one in the near future).
2.) Lack of advertising, at least compared to
Does anyone know if a Pentax RAW plugin will be available for Album?
On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 17:31, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
From the Photoshop List. Perhaps some folks here will find
this of value.
In last week's Personal Technology column in the Wall Street Journal
This wasn't comment but a real question. I myslef would never pay $3000+ for a
cmaera. The *ist D is about the upper limit for me. I do think that pros and
enthusiasts that use Pentax MF might spring for it since they spend bigger money on
their equipment.
Steven Desjardins
Department of
I personally think Pentax is far more concerned with the D70 than this
Canon. That's where their money is . ..
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
... or was!?!
Be nice if Pentax could undercut them both, but I suspect Canon would
just drop their prices if this were the case!
-Original Message-
From: Steve Desjardins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I personally think Pentax is far more concerned with the D70
than this Canon.
Anyone ever try to calibrate that white body cap to
use as an incident meter?
:-)
But wouldn't it too wide a coverage for an incident meter?
regards
Lukasz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
www.fotopolis.pl
===
internetowy
It had better be is. Pentax only really competes with N and C in the
amateur market. I admit I have not idea what they plan to do at the MF
level. The only high end camera I see for them is a digital back for
their 645nii, or a redesigned 645 dual format. As has been pointed out
here, what's
Hey all.. Just got back from a massive camping trip, and boy was it fun..
One headache now though, and unfortunately it's not from the sun. One of the
rolls I took was Press 800 but rated at 1600, and I was intending to take it
down to the prolab to get them to leave it in the soup a bit longer.
Sorry my reply was meant to be tongue in cheek.
I am sure Pentax will still do well in this segment, and that this is
the area where they will achieve most sales of SLRs in the coming years.
If they didn't bring out the Baby D in 2004, we would probably see the
price of the istD decline
On 28/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Chris (a digital user who thinks film has soul [sorry Cotty])
Don't apologise! I agree.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Free UK Mac Ads
I'd like to know what you think of the Optio 550.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, in part:
I'm surprised myself that there isn't much discussion about other Pentax
digital equipment. Given the slightest encouragement (you are warned!) I
would
be happy to discuss the wonderful Optio 550
http://www.geocities.com/heygoosey/RyanBikeBrissie.JPG
I luckily had a couple of shots left on a roll I wanted to get printed, so
what better way to waste film than a self portrait! I just got my Singh Ray
Gold Blue Polariser in the mail today, pity I couldn't have used it for
the shot, but hey..
Just had this link sent to me. Some excellent stuff.
http://www.fifth-essence.com/archive/bestpix2003/index.htm
#7 was flipping through the channels and landed on one of those annoying,
pointless, celebrity lifestyle shows. I didn't scream in frustration since
they were talking about a photo shoot.
Anyway, Dave Navarro and Carmen Electra hired a photographer to take a shot
for their wedding invitation. The
I didn't mean to sound so severe, either.
I see Pentax with 3 possible D's (the 3D strategy):
The low end Baby D, sub $1000
The *ist D and it's successors, $1000-2000
The MF offering.
I would be really surprised if we saw a direct N d2h or C 1DII
competitor from Pentax. I'd be pleased,
Thank you to everyone who took the time to respond to my request
for critiques. Usually, when I ask friends for comment on my work,
they tend to not be very critical. I will try some of the suggested
image manipulation and report on the results.
Here's another, fresh off the scanner...
Mostly pap, cute animal pics, and flashy colors. A few
nice pics. Surprisingly lacking by comparison is
reportage or documentary work.
Doug Brewer wrote:
Just had this link sent to me. Some excellent stuff.
http://www.fifth-essence.com/archive/bestpix2003/index.htm
http://www.pbase.com/image/25524341
Couldn't imagine better composition and level of details ;-
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
Old Tri-X in ID-11, Nikon 4000 something scanner @ 4000dpi:
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/images/5.html
This file is straight from the scanner other than conversion
to JPEG and reduced size. No manipulation at all, no
sharpening ... nada!
Would be happy to send you a section of the
Why waste our time with such crap ...
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/image/25524341
Couldn't imagine better composition and level of details ;-
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
Cute ;-)
Quoting Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://www.pbase.com/image/25524341
Couldn't imagine better composition and level of details ;-
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
-
This mail sent through IMP:
At 10:48 AM 1/28/04, throwing caution to the wind, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Mostly pap, cute animal pics, and flashy colors. A few
nice pics. Surprisingly lacking by comparison is
reportage or documentary work.
The mother and child escaping from the fighting in Macedonia and the
Palestinian
on 28.01.04 17:08, Shel Belinkoff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why waste our time with such crap ...
I thought it was just funny :-) But I see that you have completely different
sense of humour than me...
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
Aric scribed,snipped,
I am using Vuescan. What combinations of film/developer/scanner
settings are yielding go BW results for folks here?
Aric
Hi.
I have,as do several others here,the Epson 2450(others have the 3200)and i find that
35mm
On 28/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I am certainly not itching to buy a baby D, I am personally itching to
see what 'Papa D' has to offer! I understand why they have to approach
it in this order though.
Do you really believe they will make a Papa D, Rob?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/image/25524341
Couldn't imagine better composition and level of details ;-
Love it!
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
On 28/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
http://www.geocities.com/heygoosey/RyanBikeBrissie.JPG
I luckily had a couple of shots left on a roll I wanted to get printed, so
what better way to waste film than a self portrait! I just got my Singh Ray
Gold Blue Polariser in the mail today, pity I
Hi Shel,
I think what you have to remember here is that tthis is a gallery of
People's Choice photos. I think that's why it's largely comprised of
work that entertains rather than informs. I too appreciate pictures that
tell a deeper story, but I don't think that any of these are pap.
They're all
I said lacking by comparison, not lacking.
Brewer wrote:
At 10:48 AM 1/28/04, throwing caution to the wind, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Mostly pap, cute animal pics, and flashy colors. A few
nice pics. Surprisingly lacking by comparison is
reportage or documentary work.
The mother and
Yes I really do.
I don't believe it will have all of the features I want (Full frame
35mm, Magnesium body, shape/control layout similar to MZ-S and More MP)
but I hope it will have something *closer to* my ideal (slightly larger
sensor than istD, more MP and magnesium body). The sensor in the
Is that Scanwit a flatbed scanner?
Did you scan the negs on the Nikon scanner,
or did someone do it for you?
Rothman, Aric wrote:
I thought my scanner might be to blame. Admittedly a cheapo
(Scanwit 2720S), I scanned some negatives with the local
camera shops Nikon scanner and got similar
Yes, Sylwek, your picture did not Draw The Viewer In. It exhibited a
Disconnect. It did not render adequately the Subtle Interplay Of Light And
Shadow. It did not Tell A Story. You obviously did not Have The Entire Scene
Completed In Your Head Before You Even Picked Up The Camera.
HAR.
Cotty wrote:
Do you really believe they will make a Papa D, Rob?
I'm not Rob, but I'm sure Pentax will eventually produce digital cameras
with much higher resolution than the current offerings. The technology
isn't going to stand still. I would guess that in two to three years, 10
megapixel
Well, maybe pap was too strong a word. I'm real cranky
this morning.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
but I don't think that any of these are pap.
on 28.01.04 18:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, Sylwek, your picture did not Draw The Viewer In. It exhibited a
Disconnect. It did not render adequately the Subtle Interplay Of Light And
Shadow. It did not Tell A Story. You obviously did not Have The Entire Scene
At 11:08 AM 1/28/04, throwing caution to the wind, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Why waste our time with such crap ...
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/image/25524341
Couldn't imagine better composition and level of details ;-
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
Did we forget our
lol Cotty! Thanks, but truth is girls don't seem to go for skinny. Maybe if
I stick (no pun intended) around long enough, twigs will come back?
Cheers,
Ryan
PS. Lasses don't go for bicycles either! Two strikes.. argh. I hear a lot of
them have a thing for tour de france cyclists' calves..
Hi!
Fascinating. To me it looks like a forcefield of some sort. A little
patch of bright in the middle part of the land completes this. I hope
I am at least half-reasonably clear.
Boris
Ya don't say!
I almost sent a sarcastic reply to your comment aimed at Sylwester, but
when two similar comments came in together I figured 'give the guy a
break - he is obviously having a bad day!'
I actually quite like many of the shots in Doug's link though...
Then again I am more into nice
You're working the wrong angle.
You have a camera and you shoot b/w, therefore you're an artist.
See where I'm going here?
tv
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 12:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: People Their
At 09:01 AM 1/28/2004, you wrote:
I'd like to know what you think of the Optio 550.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, in part:
I'm surprised myself that there isn't much discussion about other Pentax
digital equipment. Given the slightest encouragement (you are warned!) I
would
be happy to
It's a rainbow. When I told my wife I had a rainbow image in BW, she
derisively laughed, and said it would just be gas! After she saw it,
she asked for a print to give to a friend as a gift!
Aric
-Original Message-
From: Boris Liberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
The Scanwit is a 35mm film scanner.
http://www.photoscientia.co.uk/Review.htm
I did not operate the Nikon scanner. The fellow who performed the
scan for me is a seasoned BW photographer, processor, and wet printer.
Aric
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi!
Has anybody hooked up an *istD to a win98SE PC?
Seen some threads about win98 not supporting USB fully
but win98SE should work.
Have bought myself a used laptop with win98SE. It
wants me to insert a driver for the camera when I
connect it to the USB-port :(
/Peter
Just out of curiousity...do any of these looked dovtored to you?
My mom had sent me this link and I sort of dismissed it. She sends me a lot
of doctored crap.
tv
-Original Message-
From: Rob Brigham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 12:07 PM
To: [EMAIL
Rob Brigham posted, among other things:
I actually quite like many of the shots in Doug's link though...
Then again I am more into nice pics than reportage/docupics so I guess
I would, wouldn't I?
I liked the pics Doug shared, too. Especially with the relative lack of
Peter Hillerstrom a écrit:
Hi!
Has anybody hooked up an *istD to a win98SE PC?
Seen some threads about win98 not supporting USB fully
but win98SE should work.
Have bought myself a used laptop with win98SE. It
wants me to insert a driver for the camera when I
connect it to the USB-port :(
The
Hello Antti-Pekka,
My personal belief is that it is NOT the lack of film availabilty that
will be the issue, but the cost to buy and PROCESS/PRINT it.
Depending on where you are in the world, this may be the case. Here
in the USA, the number of 1 hour minilabs is starting to drop unless
they
No, it's what ~I~ meant to say. I'm newish to this scanning
thing, and it's entirely possible I may not know the
difference between a really good scan and a lesser quality
scan.
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Of course, it's always possible that I can't tell a good
scan from a poor one, or a
Frank is now in my kill file. And also, my drinks file.
Hic.
---Lon the Blatently Stupid.
And, BTW, Cotty can't be trusted any further than you can
throw any engine out of a 1950's 'Murican car.
Hic. -Lon, the icredibly besotten.
frank theriault wrote:
Drinks? Did someone
In my hands, the K 24mm f2.8 has chromatic aberration out
the wing wang.
Flavio Minelli wrote:
Not to pour cold water on your enthusiasms, but must somewhat disagree
with what have been said about this lens. I have it too but right now
it's one of my most unused lenses, especially since I got a
Just have it developed normally. You went to an honest shop. No one pushes C-41,
at least in a processing machine. Bill Robb will tell you it can't be done at
all. However, I think he is wrong about that, it can be pushed if you hand
develop it. But C-41 film works quite well at one stop
BTW, welcome back, Marnie. Haven't seen you post in a while. Have you
been lurking? ;-)
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/28/04 01:03PM
In a message dated
Bang! grin
I entirely agree about the hands. The photo misses the decisive moment by
about a week. And, yes, it is a genuine barber shop. Something that is
disappearing in the US being mostly replaced by Unisex Styling Salons.
I do have a lot of emotional involvement with this photo, but it
Question - When I open a file, the dialog box comes up with the files listed
in file mode, and sorted by size. I can hit the little dropdown box to
change the parms, but I can't figure out how to get it to default to show
details and sort by name.
I'm running XP pro.
Any help appreciated.
tv
Hi, Nick,
Could be two different models. Sounds like Paul's has a ~much~ larger
filter ring than mine, which is 62mm. Also, given that it's a cheap lens,
there are likely QC issues from sample to sample.
I also think that much of it is that some are more demanding and critical
than others.
Indeed ... LOL (good natured jibe)
OOF frank theriault wrote:
OTOH, if you've seen some of my photos, you'll know that sharpness isn't my
Holy Grail... vbg
Shel,
I figured I better throw that line in there as a pre-emptive strike.
vbg
- the oof-meister
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Indeed ... LOL (good natured
What do you plan to do with the images once scanned? It seems like that
would be the real driver. If you plan to print them, does the printer
require RGB or will it work OK with grayscale?
- MCC
At 11:01 AM 1/27/2004 -0800, you wrote:
Over the next few weeks I'm going to attempt scanning a
Hmmm...
Shot with a Canon, eh?
vbg
cheers,
frank
PS: Unlike others, I happened to notice that you didn't shoot it, Sylwester
g.
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL
Hi folks,
PUG is back
Cheers Adelheid
link don't work for me :-(
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: People Their Bikes - Frank, one more
http://www.graywolfphoto.com/presscameras/
I was not wearing the trench coat and fedora when I took the barber shop photo.
--
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
I don't know anything about Graywolf's equipment of course.
--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com
You might as well accept people as they
I do admit to feeling a bit outclassed when one of these was taken with
the Hubble telescope. Damn, when is there going to be a Pentax version
. ..?
I almost posted the bunny ears one...
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I *almost* posted the foot picture, but was able to restrain myself.
tv
Someone owes us a beer.
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 4:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: pOT: People Their Bikes - Frank, one more for
your collection!
I almost posted the bunny ears one...
Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I expect that color film use five to ten years from now will at
least equal black and white film use today.
Now that's the first film-to-digital transition speculation that makes
sense to me. Well put.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
Lon Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
did I read that right? 8.2MP and 8.5 frames per second for 40 frames?
Man, I knew Canon was going to respond to the Nikon D2h by PMA but I
didn't think they'd blow it away like this!
This is
Absolutely fabulous! :-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 4:51 PM
Subject: Încredible eagle shot!!!
http://www.pbase.com/image/25524341
Couldn't imagine better composition and level of
Well done, Igor and Adelheid!
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Adelheid v. K. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 10:00 PM
Subject: PUG is back
Hi folks,
PUG is back
Cheers Adelheid
Hmmm...
Shot with a Canon, eh?
Yup, people say that with 100-400 L IS - very good lens for nature as we can
see ;-)
PS: Unlike others, I happened to notice that you didn't shoot it, Sylwester
g.
Bingo ;-) You have beer when we meet!
--
Best regards
Sylwek
Hi list,
I also still do have a machine on 98SE - but I got myself a little
Sandisk FireWire/CF reader -
512MB are loaded in less than 1min 30s !
So what's all the fuzz about USB1.1, USB2.0, full-speed hispeed USB...
;-) !?!
Thomas
Michel Carrère-Gée schrieb:
Peter Hillerstrom a écrit:
Hi!
I have one question and one answer.
Steve - I wouldn't be tempted by $800-$900 DSLR until Pentax produces
one as for me it would mean buying lenses too, which is over my head.
I may be tempted however by $700 DZLR assuming prices of Nikon CoolPix
8700 eventually reach that level and it
Hi,
Mostly pap, cute animal pics, and flashy colors. A few
nice pics. Surprisingly lacking by comparison is
reportage or documentary work.
it was a vote. It's why there are no great mass-circulation
documentary magazines any more. Only about 13 people on the planet
are interested.
--
Hi list,
...
t Just out of curiousity...do any of these looked dovtored to you?
What do you think about the 747 passing the moon?
I think with a focal lenght of about 1600mm equiv.,
one of the two should be out of focus...depth of field is very flat...or
is it already hyperfocal at 35.000 feet?
Hi,
The airplane and moon shot is highly suspect.
I disagree. A few years ago I did a contract in West London, near
Heathrow airport. I used to get the train home from Syon Lane. In the
late autumn at about 5.30/6pm the moon was generally very low in the sky
and planes were coming in once a
Indeed!!
Thanks so much for all your hard work.
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PUG is back
Thomas Stach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also still do have a machine on 98SE - but I got myself a little
Sandisk FireWire/CF reader -
512MB are loaded in less than 1min 30s !
So what's all the fuzz about USB1.1, USB2.0, full-speed hispeed USB...
;-) !?!
Come to think of it, the original poster
Except that this plane is showing contrails...generally denotes high
altitude.
Norm
Bob W wrote:
snipIn the late autumn at about 5.30/6pm the moon was generally very
low in the sky
and planes were coming in once a minute exactly as you see in that photo.
snip
If the boeing/moon is a double, it's well done. The light angle fits very
well, and the plane is slightly blurred.
But it seems almost too good to be true, though.
Actually, I'm more suspicious about the authenticity northern pike picture.
To my knowledge, the pike always takes its prey head
Primary use is for an on line portfolio. Secondary will be
inkjet prints, although most of the prints (I hope) will be
good ol' silver prints made directly from the negs. IAC,
many of the final inkjet prints will have a subtle tone to
them, like printing on Agfa Portriga Rapid.
shel
Mark
It's just right on the 3.5 screen of my PDA!
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26/01/04 19:31:05
To: PDML[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Me and Bobby McGee
Just a little snap from a few nights ago.
I'd be interested in how the
LOL, literally!
- MCC
At 04:51 PM 1/28/2004 +0100, you wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/image/25524341
Couldn't imagine better composition and level of details ;-
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
-
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo, MI
http://www.markcassino.com
-
I got bit by it on Sunday and it was a real PITA. The infected email I got
arrived a couple of hours before Symantec put updated Virus defs on
line.Today alone, I've rec'd over 150 infected emails (that Norton has
squelched, thankfully.)
- MCC
At 09:29 AM 1/27/2004 +0100, you wrote:
William Robb suggested that the cheaper operating costs of his
digital relative to his LX are false economy because his ratio
of good shots is higher on film.
I'd agree on a couple of points, namely
1) I've had lousy luck with my LX economically speaking as well
2) I shoot more with digital
Also happens at high humidity.
I've seen vortex trails off the rear wings of race cars,
which generally run at a fairly low altitude :-)
Except that this plane is showing contrails...generally denotes high
altitude.
Norm
Bob W wrote:
snipIn the late autumn at about 5.30/6pm the moon
On 28 Jan 2004 at 19:36, Nick Clark wrote:
Message from a non-posting member. I'm guessing there could be two production
lines, or possibly two different models, of this lens given the totally polar
viewpoints?
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Fox, Paul[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
