On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 02:30:52 -0700 (PDT), Hans Imglueck wrote:
Hi all,
I tried to do as is described bellow, but the 2.5mm stereo
plug does not fit - it is to thick. What do I wrong?
How thick is the original romote plug?
Hans,
I am half way through making one of these. The problem is -
I cropped it a bit from the previous post per suggestion. Now the focus is
on the little girl. Any comments?
Thanks,
John Power
Racehorse in the desert
http://www.solutns.com/jpeg/corinne.emma2.jpg
This one time, at band camp, Antonio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1306788forward=main
pfft, no aperature ring...
Kevin
--
__
(_ \
_) )
| / / _ ) /
Nicely done. (Very doglike).
Hans Imglueck wrote:
Hi,
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2614769size=lg
Please find the details under the Details button!
Comments are welcome!
Regards, Hans.
_
23a mail
Things go better with coke
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: David Madsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Coca-cola develop a new k-mount lens for Pentax cameras
Gives new meaning to Have a Coke and - Smile!
-Original Message-
From: Antonio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is a sign I found on the streets of San FRrancisco last week:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2615535size=md
WARNING!!! This photograph is Explicit and quite graphic. It may
offend some viewers on this list!
Dan M
I have a website client who wants me to take portraits of the staff of
his law firm for the website. We will probably have a group shot that
looks something like this
http://www.dardeno.com/profile.php as well as individual portraits.
Will I be ok using the istD and its popup flash, or should I
On 16/8/04, Amita Guha, discombobulated, offered:
I have a website client who wants me to take portraits of the staff of
his law firm for the website. We will probably have a group shot that
looks something like this
http://www.dardeno.com/profile.php as well as individual portraits.
Will I be
On 16/8/04, Daniel J. Matyola, discombobulated, offered:
Here is a sign I found on the streets of San FRrancisco last week:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2615535size=md
WARNING!!! This photograph is Explicit and quite graphic. It may
offend some viewers on this list!
Dan M
10 years ago I would have said no, popup flash or even a shoe flash
wouldn't be good enough. I've seen enough
stuff passed off as professional work that today I don't know. For
formal portraiture I personally would use at least
two lights, a primary and a modeling light. On the other hand this
--- John Power [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cropped it a bit from the previous post per
suggestion. Now the focus is
on the little girl. Any comments?
Thanks,
John Power
Racehorse in the desert
http://www.solutns.com/jpeg/corinne.emma2.jpg
John,
I didn't see the previous
--- Amita Guha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a website client who wants me to take
portraits of the staff of
his law firm for the website. We will probably have
a group shot that
looks something like this
http://www.dardeno.com/profile.php as well as
individual portraits.
Will I be
Sorry Bob W, I meant Bob B. My mistake. You always behave as a perfect
gentleman.
Antonio
On 16/8/04 8:51 am, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
From: Antonio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In fact I am starting to get a feel for who the abusers are on this list
(you, Tom C, Greyworld, Peter Alling,
Ah you trollers, forever seeking attention.
Antonio
On 16/8/04 9:47 am, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I join?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
If you can't manage a set of lights, then use window light and
reflectors.
If neither is possible, use off camera flash via an extension cord to
the PC socket.
The pop up flash is useless in this application.
William Robb
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Things go better with coke
Kenneth Waller
Hey - that's my (subject) line !
I did _not_ borrow this camera to take the picture
of Trey Wright :)
fun stuff.
annsan
-Original Message-
From: David Madsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Coca-cola develop a
Amita Guha wrote:
I have a website client who wants me to take portraits of the staff of
his law firm for the website. We will probably have a group shot that
looks something like this
http://www.dardeno.com/profile.php as well as individual portraits.
Will I be ok using the istD and its
Hello Amita,
You are going to have to possibly contend with three different issues
with the popup flash.
1) redeye - may be unavoidable - Shoe flash or bigger lights will
solve the problem - may have to do some editing to remove the redeye
2) harsh lighting - unkind to blemishes/wrinkles - shoe
Hi all,
is there any official or reasonable convention how to name the new familiy
of digital lenses?
The official sites use e.g.
DA lenses / DA-lenses
smcDA, smc-DA, Pentax smc DA
smc PENTAX-DA, smc Pentax-DA, Pentax smc DA
(probably P for Pentax in smc P-DA).
The latest macros show smc
I'd rather invest the money in marketing in order to grow a business. Equipment is
not success and assets are not success. The only way to attain success is persistent
hard work. Nothing less. (At least not in a generally free economy.)
The equipment I've got now would be more than enough
I saw the humor in the link from Wheatfield too, Dave.
Sometimes unintended humor is the best, though.
There's such a striking parallell between Antonio's logic and my own!
Example:
Any mail from Antonio to PDML *becomes* trash mail on my computer.
Excellent logic, really. You got to give him
I'm pretty sure that the only reason I got left off his little hate list
is because I switched his posts to the bit-bucket far earlier than the
list of honorees below.
You've apparently abused Antonio, I think just because you exist, so
when is since he's been subscribed to the list I would
Hi all,
is there any official or reasonable convention how to name the new familiy
of digital lenses?
The Pentax Browser software currently identifies the 16-45 as
smc PENTAX-DA 16-45mmF4ED AL
While that may change at any time (the lens names come from a config file),
I'd assume
frank said:
BTW, the sample group portrait that you provided us,
the old guy in the middle looks like he's constipated.
I'd say, try to have your subjects avoid that look.
Okay, I'm just trying to be funny. I have no
suggestions at all for you. I'll go away now... g
Trying to be funny
Calumet sells a Pentax body cap with a laser cut pinhole for about $30.
(In case anyone was taking this seriously ;-)
Don't you think they want seperate portraits?
By the way - ther group photo looks like 2 pairs of twins - and the father
on one of the twin pairs :-)
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Amita Guha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt:
On the box it is SMC PENTAX DA ZOOM 16-45mm F4 ED AL
So more or less the same
Henk Terhell
-Original Message-
From: John Francis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 August, 2004 6:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: naming conventions on smc-DA
Hi all,
is there any
One thing I know, yours will be a hell of a lot
better than
that stilted photo!
Thanks for the vote of confidence. :) Still, I asked the client what his
budget is for this, since since I don't feel confident doing this
indoors and we might have to hire someone else.
Why not take them
Don¹t worry Norm, you were included amongst the few others, along with the
other sheep (Coty, Don Co.)
By the way, what is it with you guys and Penis size?
Antonio
On 16/8/04 2:15 am, Norman Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't forget me, you little prick.
Norm
From: Antonio [EMAIL
Sorry - never heard of you.
A.
On 16/8/04 9:59 am, Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Me too. Allright, not so frequently ;-) Not only that, but I'm a traitor too
:-P
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
Sorry - never heard of you.
A.
On 16/8/04 9:59 am, Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Me too. Allright, not so frequently ;-) Not only that, but I'm a traitor too
:-P
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
Amita,
If you have a hotshoe flash with bounce capabilities, and a ceiling that
is low enough, then I think that this is your best bet (or at least your
best bet with minimal set-up). And beyond that, my only suggestion is to
take advantage of the fact that you are shooting ditigal! Try it. If it
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
frank said:
BTW, the sample group portrait that you provided
us,
the old guy in the middle looks like he's
constipated.
I'd say, try to have your subjects avoid that
look.
snip
Trying to be funny (and succeeding) but he IS right
about that guy's look,
The plan is to do both group shots and individual photos...
-Original Message-
From: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 1:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Corporate portraits
Don't you think they want seperate portraits?
By the way -
Blast you sir! Now you've gone and done it!
You went and made me actually start thinking. ouch
I was just practicing to be stand-by comic relief for the next time Frank
gets miffed at us. ;-)
OK. I'll bite, how *does* one decide how far from the film plane the pinhole
in a pinhole camera should
Unless you know exactly the look that the firm is looking for, then you have to be
prepared to handle some range of lighting. Since it's a law firm they will probably
want something in the tradition/formal style. The pop up flash is useless for anything
other than fill - forget that. A shoe
- Original Message -
From: Don Sanderson
Subject: RE: New Project, Need Help!
Blast you sir! Now you've gone and done it!
You went and made me actually start thinking. ouch
I was just practicing to be stand-by comic relief for the next time
Frank
gets miffed at us. ;-)
OK. I'll
From: Don Sanderson
Subject: RE: New Project, Need Help!
Blast you sir! Now you've gone and done it!
You went and made me actually start thinking.
ouch
I was just practicing to be stand-by comic relief
for the next time
Frank
gets miffed at us. ;-)
Hey, you can be funny while
The focal-length of a pinhole is equal to the distance from the film plane. The
f-stop is equal to the focal-length divided by the diameter of the pinhole. If
the hole is too big, the image is too defused to use. Too small and you do not
get enough light. There is an optimum size for a given
http://www.pentaxusa.com/news/news_display.cfm?pressid=199
http://www.pentaxusa.com/news/news_display.cfm?pressid=200
--
Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- John Power [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, here is one more. (I'll clean off the other
text this time.) Would
have been nice if this window had drapes on it, but
I did the best I could
with inside/outside light. An assistant held a
white reflector to the left
of the bride.
On 16/8/04, Christian, discombobulated, offered:
http://www.pentaxusa.com/news/news_display.cfm?pressid=199
http://www.pentaxusa.com/news/news_display.cfm?pressid=200
--
Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pics here:
http://www.dpreview.com/
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
Sorry Frank, I'm just not ready for that yet.
Well now, wait a minute, if the bunny ears go with the title...
Nah, you're too darn good at it, afraid you'll have to keep it a while
longer. ;-)
IMHO you're a pretty darn good photographer too.
Don
-Original Message-
From:
On 16/8/04, Cotty, discombobulated, offered:
On 16/8/04, Christian, discombobulated, offered:
http://www.pentaxusa.com/news/news_display.cfm?pressid=199
http://www.pentaxusa.com/news/news_display.cfm?pressid=200
--
Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pics here:
http://www.dpreview.com/
Hey that
Thanks Tom, I'll go look at some.
It'll give something to do till I get rid of this wretched Cold turned Flu!
Don
-Original Message-
From: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 12:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New Project, Need Help!
The
--- John Power [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is a PAW. Don't think I sent in more than one
this week. :)
http://www.solutns.com/jpeg/corinne.emma.jpg
Of course we might move the flowers a little farther
from the little girl's
face, and I might work on it in Photoshop. But it
was
Hi,
Monday, August 16, 2004, 4:36:59 PM, Amita wrote:
I have a website client who wants me to take portraits of the staff of
his law firm for the website. We will probably have a group shot that
looks something like this
http://www.dardeno.com/profile.php as well as individual portraits.
IMO a camera of the 750Z class should have a flash shoe, and preferably a
2.0 lens :-/.
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 16. august 2004 19:58
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: two
--- Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.pentaxusa.com/news/news_display.cfm?pressid=199
http://www.pentaxusa.com/news/news_display.cfm?pressid=200
--
Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interesting. The 750Z will have more megapixels than
the top of the line DSLR? A bit of a
Maybe so. But this doesn't look to bad (over sharpened) to me:
http://www.fotokritik.dk/visstort.html?pic=91083
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Brendan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 16. august 2004 22:02
Til: [EMAIL
On 16/8/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, offered:
Interesting. The 750Z will have more megapixels than
the top of the line DSLR? A bit of a marketing
conundrum?
Looks like two nice cams, though.
cheers,
frank
Yeah but Frank, because of the sensor size, even a 3MP D30 will blow away
the
You guys better stop picking on Antonio, now. He sued his parents and had
them thrown in jail.
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DA14mm - why so large and heavy?
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 06:30:17 -0600
I was going to
I like it Ann. The purist in me does not like the plastic wrapper. OTOH,
it has a lacelike effect which complements the flowers.
I'd probably like to see a little more of the wrapper... it depends if you
intended to convey that this was an arranged boquet or purely flowers.
Pretty.
Tom C.
Same here. I have to empty the trash all the time, it gets full of
***nio posts.
John Francis wrote:
I'm pretty sure that the only reason I got left off his little hate list
is because I switched his posts to the bit-bucket far earlier than the
list of honorees below.
You've apparently
Thats scary! And how do they suppose they are going to get x% of the
digtal camera market, I forgot what the quote was? I dont know what is
going to save them from getting out of the DSLR business. Only their
pride and the cachet of having a DSLR will keep them making them.
John Francis
John Francis wrote:
Does anyone haave a clue about the K-mount acompatibility of the expected
new 900 USD Baby *ist D?
Jens
Prediction: exactly the same as the *ist-D.
There's no reason not to include the stop-down metering mode introduced
with the firmware upgrade. On the other hand, I
Tom C wrote:
I like it Ann. The purist in me does not like the plastic wrapper. OTOH,
it has a lacelike effect which complements the flowers.
I'd probably like to see a little more of the wrapper... it depends if you
intended to convey that this was an arranged boquet or purely flowers.
-Original Message-
From: Jerome Reyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
And
beyond that, my only suggestion is to take advantage of the
fact that you are shooting ditigal! Try it. If it doesn't
work, try something else. a... the beauty of instant feedback.
There's this really bad
On Aug 16, 2004, at 8:25 PM, Jens Bladt wrote:
Does anyone haave a clue about the K-mount acompatibility of the
expected
new 900 USD Baby *ist D?
No, not yet anyway :-) But rumours are telling about very low price -
at least German Color Foto magazine wrote an article about predicted
price of
On Aug 16, 2004, at 8:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.. and a flip-out LCD screen.
As it is, it would make a worthy successor to the 555, I think. But
even better
if it had what you suggest.
Well ERN, you're absolutely right :-) 555 is a very good digicam in its
class. Two of my friends who
On Aug 16, 2004, at 8:23 PM, frank theriault wrote:
Interesting. The 750Z will have more megapixels than
the top of the line DSLR? A bit of a marketing
conundrum?
Just a marketing blah, blah. 7MPix on small-nail-sized CCD won't make
any wonders for image quality :-) At least in terms of
- Original Message -
From: Keith Whaley
Subject: Re: two new digicams...
I noticed they did carefully leave out the aperture range...
f/2.8-f/4.6
Its in the specifications at the bottom of the page.
Not bad for a 5X zoom lens.
A hot shoe would be nice, although I expect there are 3
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: Baby s*ist*er D
Perhaps you are right, John. However, the Baby s*ist*er D should be
even
more aimed at people with several K-mount lenses and an
insufficient
budget/no need for the built-quality - of the *ist D!
If they couldn't
On Aug 16, 2004, at 9:42 PM, Jens Bladt wrote:
Does anyone know this lens?
My friend has bought it for *istD. It seems to be quite decent
especially considering its price tag. Many people around are quite
content with it too.
--
Best regards
Sylwek
If the baby had full compatibility with K and M mounts lenses, it would be
a slap in the face to all those who paid good money for the *ist D and had
lots of older lenses. If the baby did have full compatibility I would get
one.
Jim A.
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
As I think further about it... if the same bouquet was viewed entirely
through a rainspotted wrapper...as in lay flat rainspotted wrapper across
the top of the bouquet... that might be very very nice...
Tom C. (taking a break from abusing Antonio)
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 16, 2004, at 10:02 PM, Brendan wrote:
The D70 really does not outperform the D100 in regards
to image quality! The images are oversharpened and
have lots of artifacts and moire problems. For
consumers they would prefer this over photoshop
sharpening hence why the D70 is a big hit!
Nah, you
On Aug 16, 2004, at 8:31 PM, frank theriault wrote:
A compact camera with a 5x zoom, and you want it to be
f2.0?
Okay...
That's perfectly possible in small CCD digicams and it happened
allready in even 7x zoom lens :-) Look here:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonydscf828/page2.asp
--
Best
On Aug 16, 2004, at 5:51 PM, Cotty wrote:
Hey, someone's been messing with adapters on that camera
Just a pity they didn't show this RebelX with K 50/1.2 mounted ;-)
--
Best regards
Sylwek
tom wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jerome Reyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
And
beyond that, my only suggestion is to take advantage of the
fact that you are shooting ditigal! Try it. If it doesn't
work, try something else. a... the beauty of instant feedback.
There's
I'm of the opinion that the interface will be more like the *ist film
camera. That one has no HyperManual mode - ie: no green button.
Basically is it much closer to a SuperProgram but only has one dial.
When in manual mode you have to hold in a button while spinning the
dial for aperture and the
On 16/8/04, tom, discombobulated, offered:
And
beyond that, my only suggestion is to take advantage of the
fact that you are shooting ditigal! Try it. If it doesn't
work, try something else. a... the beauty of instant feedback.
There's this really bad moment when you're reviewing
Realized that the 20th fast approacheth, so I better
start thinking about next month's PUG offering.
I look, and the theme is mystery.
Sheesh! Mystery? What the hell am I going to do
with that one?
Of course, I could submit almost anything, and
someone's bound to ask themselves, Why the hell
On 16/8/04, Sylwester Pietrzyk, discombobulated, offered:
Hey, someone's been messing with adapters on that camera
Just a pity they didn't show this RebelX with K 50/1.2 mounted ;-)
Well actually I can get better quality using a Pentax lens onto an EOS
body (SMC aside) than by fitting FDs
No, no, I know... to be like HCB and leave the 35mm uncropped!
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Because I could. Because I liked the spatial relationship created by so
doing. Because the image is as much a graphic as a photograph of a red
chair. Because I sometimes like a lot of space
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The person this camera is aimed at likely won't have a clue about the
compatability issues revolving around 30 year old lenses, and won't
care.
The camera (vapourware admitedly) will be aimed squarely at the
digital Rebel market.
I've heard that it will use
Honestly I see the P30t has a very good cheap learning camera. Even now it
is not that bad. It can work in any mode except TV. The absence of TTL is a
non issue when learning IMO, if you learn photography you need to learn
flash too, don't you?
Moreover it has a DOF preview (and no the Z1 has
Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm of the opinion that the interface will be more like the *ist film
camera. That one has no HyperManual mode - ie: no green button.
Basically is it much closer to a SuperProgram but only has one dial.
When in manual mode you have to hold in a button while
Bruce Dayton wrote:
I'm of the opinion that the interface will be more like the *ist film
camera. That one has no HyperManual mode - ie: no green button.
I really think that it will be just as crippled as the *ist Film body
- basically no pre-A lenses at all, except for those that stop
I think he's got it.
frank theriault wrote:
Realized that the 20th fast approacheth, so I better
start thinking about next month's PUG offering.
I look, and the theme is mystery.
Sheesh! Mystery? What the hell am I going to do
with that one?
Of course, I could submit almost anything, and
JCO posted:
I think the lighting in the sample portrait at
http://www.dardeno.com/profile.php can be easily duplicated using a
PZ-1p with a AF500-FTZ bounced off the ceiling or through a diffuser
combined with the RTF flash. I'm not sure how you'd do that with the
*ist-D because I've
Frank quoted and posted:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well that's only 1/2 stop faster than the 550's (5x)
zoom's maximum, and
technology improves all the time (doesn't it?)
Eleanor,
I didn't realize that such lenses were that fast.
f2.8 is fairly impressive for such a small
Must be a different Joyce Chen from the one(s) in Boston. I met Joyce
Chen at one of her restaurants in Boston, and the food was unbelievably
good. There were quite a few chinese people in the restaurant as
well. She is survived by her daughter Helen, who I think is still
running the
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=30020item=3831265582rd=1
Note the closing price and what isn't included: software cd, box, manual.
Was this, both literally and figuratively, a steal?
Joe
Mr Robb said, among other things:
The camera (vapourware admitedly) will be aimed squarely at the
digital Rebel market.
One hopes (without much encouragement) that the amount of advertising will also
compare ...
ERN
Mr Robb quoted Mr Whaley and then replied, thus:
I noticed they did carefully leave out the aperture range...
f/2.8-f/4.6
Its in the specifications at the bottom of the page.
Not bad for a 5X zoom lens.
Seems they're using the same lens from the 450, 550, 555.
FWIW, I think it's a very
From: Caveman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now that would be an interesting discussion. For the moment they're about
same price same size, with the prosumers having fixed lens and high
sensor noise as main disadvantages. But there's a conceptual difference
there. Electronic viewfinders vs. optical
Caveman wrote:
Ha ! You caught me redhanded An hour ago I was in the business of
recording the shutter sound of my LX, uploading it to the Canon S60 and
assigning it as shutter sound. Now my PS sounds like an LX ;-) And I
even can adjust the volume ;-)
Caveman,
You have too much timeon
I'd love to see a TTL finder but with out the moving
mirror, no slap, no blacked out finders, I wonder if
they could put the sensor in the finder?
--- Caveman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that would be an interesting discussion. For the
moment they're
about same price same size, with the
[second post, first one sent at 6:31 pm did not show in digest]
Tom,
I have one for use with my SMC Pentax 500/4.5. I keep a 3272 QR plate on
the lens, and I find that it provides good solid support (the QR plate is
also a good grip for those infrequent 500/4.5 hand-held shots). There is
Very nice. Captures the concentration very well.
Cory
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 9:35 PM
Subject: PESO -- Miniature
http://members.aol.com/greenfalc1/ISTD1103.jpg
Personally, I rather like it. Thought I'd see if
The Sony is that big because they wanted to make it long and fast. At
the long end it's 200/2.8 equivalent. Compared with the FA 200/2.8 it
ain't that big however.
If you keep decent at the long end (not so long or not so fast) you'll
get something like the Canon Powershot G3 or Pro1.
William
Hi Amita
I agree with the idea of an outside portrait if possible. If not, I'd rent a
small studio flash set up with umbrellas. Try BH and Alkit for rentals.
Don't forget to rent a flashmeter if you go with the flash idea.
Butch
I like it too.
However, could someone be so kind to fill me in with what PESO, PAW, WOW
and whatever mean ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://members.aol.com/greenfalc1/ISTD1103.jpg
Great, now you have to learn how to use the C1 and C2 modes and you're
all set up! Just don't bother with the
Auto-Portrait-Sports-Landscape-Slow Shutter-Whatever modes (although the
Night one comes handy when in a hurry, otherwise you'll need to fiddle a
lots of settings in order to emulate
I've thought about who the baby D will be aimed at and if they intend to
sell to the Digital Rebel market they'll
also have to get their cameras into mass Merchandisers like Wal-Mart,
Circuit City and Best Buy, and I have it on
good authority that they'll never get into Wal-Mart.
[EMAIL
Yesterday at work I had the opportunity to correct a typical Joe Sixpack
shot of a birthday cake with white icing taken under fluorescent lighting
w/o flash, a fairly common shot. I was surprised that with the color and
level adjustments available with the 375 I was able to actually get the
icing
- Original Message -
From: Brendan
Subject: Re: Prosumer vs. DSLR (was Re: two new digicams...)
I'd love to see a TTL finder but with out the moving
mirror, no slap, no blacked out finders, I wonder if
they could put the sensor in the finder?
And you are going to look through
I bought my Optio S from www.walmart.com
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 10:28 PM
Subject: Re: Baby s*ist*er D
I've thought about who the baby D will be aimed at and if they intend to
sell to the
On 16 Aug 2004 at 20:24, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Brendan
Subject: Re: Prosumer vs. DSLR (was Re: two new digicams...)
I'd love to see a TTL finder but with out the moving
mirror, no slap, no blacked out finders, I wonder if
they could put the sensor
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
