Hi,
Sunday, January 9, 2005, 10:24:53 PM, Jon wrote:
[...]
Have you looked into WebAperture? Yes, you have to put up with gushy
[...]
url: http://www.webaperture.com/
Please don't use WebAperture. It resizes the browser window without
permission, doesn't restore it when you leave the page,
Luigi de Guzman mused:
I spent, with tax, about a thousand dollars, US on the DS. I nearly threw
up;
it was the most money I'd ever spent in one go on a single piece of
photographic equipment.
I paid full release price for my *ist-D; $1695 US, I believe.
Then I watched the price tumble
At 07:06 AM 09/01/2005 , Jon Glass wrote:
I sure hope that's a distortion due to the perspective, and not snow!!!
Not really. The diameter of the snow on each line was close to 15cm. I
liked the way the light made the snow glow.
After getting a good shot I knocked the snow off to save the
G'day Frank.
Mate, You are a bloody Aussie aren't ya?
If your not, You aught to be.
If you ever get to OZ, and talk like that. The customs bloke will just
say G'day mate. Welcome home digger
And wave you through. While the rest of the sheeple will be standing in
line for hours.
Hooroo.
Regards,
On Jan 10, 2005, at 4:26 AM, frank theriault wrote:
I could get used to gushy comments LOL. But, the problem with Web
Aperture is that on my computer (or my browser or whatever) it opens
to a small window, that I have to maximize. It doesn't bother me, but
I know from reading some other comments
On Jan 10, 2005, at 9:03 AM, Bob W wrote:
Please don't use WebAperture. It resizes the browser window without
permission, doesn't restore it when you leave the page, and it does it
in such a way that it takes 2 clicks to restore. I will no longer look
at anything on WebAperture.
Now I'm _really_
Hi,
For those interested, the Voksenlia site is showing a superb example of
the sensor damage done by sun tracks at the moment. If you miss it, I
have saved the file (230Kb Jpeg) and can send it to those who want.
http://voksenlia.net/
mike
CITY OF SUNDERLAND COLLEGE DISCLAIMER
If you want a real good mouse, get the Logitech MX 1000 Laser.
It is much better than any other mouse I have ever used/tried,
including the older Logitech MX series (which isn't bad either).
This mouse works with zero problems on all surfaces I have tried
and the resolution is incredible.
From: Jon Glass [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 10, 2005, at 9:03 AM, Bob W wrote:
Please don't use WebAperture. It resizes the browser window without
permission, doesn't restore it when you leave the page, and it does it
in such a way that it takes 2 clicks to restore. I will no longer
Larry Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gianfranco,
Hi Larry,
First, thanks to all who replied.
While I as well have had problems with the battery indicator
being
reliable on the *istD, that may not be the problem.
Never thought that could be part of or affect the problem... In
fact, the
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 23:14:08 -0800, Adam McKenty wrote:
I've put some photos together into a calendar (yes, a bit behind schedule),
and I'm getting it printed by someone who runs a local news paper and
offers printing services on the side. Unfortunately neither I nor the
person doing the
Thanks Frank. I wanted to San Diego and the Packers to win as well. SD
has that tight end who never played in college, and one of my former
students played for them in the eighties. And of course I hate to see
Favre go down in flames like that. I wonder if he'll be back. Digital
is fun. I do
On 9 Jan 2005 at 23:56, Luigi de Guzman wrote:
I spent, with tax, about a thousand dollars, US on the DS. I nearly threw
up;
it was the most money I'd ever spent in one go on a single piece of
photographic
equipment, and probably equalled the value of all my gear in all formats (35mm
I got a box of color paper really cheap this weeked
and was wondering -- does one use the same developer
as with bw? (Obviously w/o a safelight.)
Collin
You impress at a distance, but you impact a life up close. The closer the
relationship the greater the impact.
Howard Hendricks
have you tried any other camera using AF under similar conditions?
Herb
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discuss pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: Sigma 2.8 Zoom lens comments
I tend to shoot moving
On 9 Jan 2005 at 11:53, Bruce Dayton wrote:
I follow about the same practice as you. Along with that, I charge
and put in a fresh set before each session that I would be shooting.
Session could be a walkabout, a portrait session, a wedding, an event
- whatever. I don't have any quirky
On 9 Jan 2005 at 8:57, Brian Dipert wrote:
The representative DID however point out that they'd need to
'digitize' their medium format product line soon; that as-is it was getting
'long in the tooth'
It's teeth have already fallen out and there aren't any gums to bother with.
Let's just
I've some good news to share, but given this is a photo list and all, I'll
let the photos tell it: http://tinyurl.com/6h6jp
The graduation photos were taken with the ist-D, while the courthouse
photos were taken with an Optio. Most of the latter photos are
underexposed because, as it turns out,
Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Herb Chong wrote:
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm sure they'll all look like typical fisheye cliches, but it was
fun, none-the-less.
but Frank, they'll all be in focus.
I wish I'd said that...
Ah, but there's much more to sharpness
My only expereince in lowish light with the istD is with my 28-105 f 4-5.6.
It seems to be fine,for what i have tested on sofar.Even the Sigma 100-300 DL
f5.6-6.3
focused well
Sunday in extremly dull and flat contrast conditions.The print showed
that,however snow
lacked all
detail in the
Jerome.
Congratulations to you and Venesa...
For her new degree and that other piece of paper you signed!
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 07:23:14 -0500 (EST), Jerome Reyes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've some good news to share, but given this is a photo list and all, I'll
let the photos
A 'porro' mirror no less!
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympuse300/
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
- Original Message -
From: Collin R Brendemuehl
Subject: Color Paper Developer
I got a box of color paper really cheap this weeked
and was wondering -- does one use the same developer
as with bw? (Obviously w/o a safelight.)
No.
William Robb
No, the istD is the only AF cameras I have used for any significant
number of pictures.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong
Subject: Re: Sigma 2.8 Zoom lens comments
have you tried any other camera using AF under similar conditions?
I tend to shoot moving subjects
- Original Message -
From: Adam McKenty
Subject: Colour laser printing issues
Hi folks,
I've put some photos together into a calendar (yes, a bit behind
schedule), and I'm getting it printed by someone who runs a local
news paper and offers printing services on the side.
No - developing color prints is a whole 'nother animal - involves color
compensating filters during exposure and developer/bleach-fix chemicals
formulated for color paper. Besseler used to have a kit, but I think they
stopped making it years ago - Kodak has one for RA-4 paper.
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, John Celio wrote:
3) buy the used AF280T (with really nice Pentax grip) that my store has had
lying around for ages. This seems to work well with a DS I've been playing
with at work, though obviously not on TTL.
Why not?
Kostas
Thanks, guys.
I'll probably just dispose of it.
So far all of the bw paper I got is fogged.
Whether old or temp related, it's still bad.
Bummer.
Collin
You impress at a distance, but you impact a life up close. The closer the
relationship the greater the impact.
Howard Hendricks
The January Procrastinators Anonymous Meeting has been put off until July.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Peter J. Alling wrote:
Dyslexics of the world UNTIE! (Sorry, it's late and I'm getting silly)...
Cesar wrote:
Be careful
Hello John
Trying to resore the AF280T is a good idea, not matter what. Use perhaps
welding lead and/or cupper or brass plates to provide contact surfaces. But
the AF280T flash don't have the AF assist beam.
I don't know P-TTL but I don't think I like it - 'cause it means pre-flash,
doesn't it?
A few months ago some friends and I went into San Francisco to see the
Carnaval Festival (http://www.carnavalsf.com/), a mostly Latin American
but multi-cultural street party covering a large area of San Fancisco's
Mission District. There was the requisite parade, lot's of music and
dancing,
I once was an indistrial designer. So I just made drawings of a sort of
lumiquest diffuser.
Transferred the drawing on to a piece of white card bord and made on my self
a cheap diffuser. Cost: app. 3$.
I use Welcro tape and broad, black rubber tape to mount it on one of ny Metz
45 CT flashes. I
Didn't you see The Santa Clause with Tim Allen:
http://tinyurl.com/729nx
It explains all the magic, in a humorous way. ;)
rg
Graywolf wrote:
I was noticing a Christmas card that someone had sent me. It had Santa
standing there by his sleigh laughing, one of the reindeer, and a couple
of Polar
I think the slow AF of the *ist D is related to a rather weak focus motor,
not the optics. It seems to be equally slow no matter what lens is used. The
AF of the MZ-S is much better - it works so fast, that the camera actually
moves in my hand when I press the shutter release half way down. The
When the more popular or common browsers don't work with a site, then the
site designer has clearly not done his or her job properly. I have probs
with IE 6 - what can be more ubiquitous than IE and Netscape?
Shel
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm using Netscape 7.2 and I get the same problem as
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Jens Bladt wrote:
would kill the atmosphere as well as annoy people in the church. Furthermore
it's naturally not allowed to use a flash in the church.
Flash is no problem in a Greek wedding, for example. Check with the
presiding person and of course the couple.
Kostas
Hi Paul
Lots clutter, and even a bit hard to see all of the dog, but I like Bull's
pup. I wonder if you could have played with it some more, getting more
detail shots that would show the dog more clearly by focusing on specific
aspects, like that wonderful tail.
Shel
From: Paul
I have a couple dozen shots of the dog, including some of Bull painting him.
(He did it out in front of the gallery.) Perhaps I'll post more later. I've
already deleted the shot I posted over the weekend. I use my photo net page as
a portfolio from time to time, so the shots I post just for
If you're paying for AF the feature should work properly, every time. It's
been about twenty years since the inception of AF cameras and you'd think
that by now the technology would be refined enough so that complaints and
concerns would be nonexistent. It seems to me that fast focusing in low
All the old paper I picked up has a gray fog to it.
Is there any chemical to minimize that?
TIA,
Collin
You impress at a distance, but you impact a life up close. The closer the
relationship the greater the impact.
Howard Hendricks
It certainly appears there are some congratulations in order.
Congrats to Venesa on a wonderful accomplishment and congrats to you
both as you embark on another phase of life.
Thanks for sharing the moments with us.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, January 10, 2005, 4:23:14 AM, you wrote:
JR
Some good BW printers used to intentionally fog a piece of paper when
attempting to print an extremely contrasty neg. However, that's with fresh
paper. If your old paper is fogged, it's probably not capable of recording a
decent image. I would say the best fix for it is the trash barrel. Why
Pixie Dust...
Graywolf wrote:
I was noticing a Christmas card that someone had sent me. It had Santa
standing there by his sleigh laughing, one of the reindeer, and a
couple of Polar Bears fondling up to him. The tiny reindeer's antlers
came to his shoulders, and the bears to his hips. Suddenly
Hmmm ... didn't see this one on the list.
The technique you mentioned Paul is called flashing, and it's certainly
more controlled than fogging. I agree 100% wrt using fogged paper unless
just for experimental purposes or perhaps for some special effects..
Although I've never tried it, nor have
...so there's no atmosphere, low ambient or candle light etc.?
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Kostas Kavoussanakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 10. januar 2005 17:36
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: RE: Flash Options
I can't say that I disagree there, Shel.
However, in my experience long distance focusing is better with AF. For
shots like this, AF is better, especially with the *ist D, with no great
focusing help (split field or similar) in the viewfinder:
In the past, my other AF Pentax bodies have focused fine in situations
where the *istD does not. I was throw off by this. It seems the
*istD has issues with AF in certain situations. That is when I had the
idea of getting a faster zoom in place of the 16-45 4.0 I have now for
the *istD. It was
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Jens Bladt wrote:
...so there's no atmosphere, low ambient or candle light etc.?
No. Photographers put up slave umbrellas. Standard issue. Same for
Christenings.
Kostas
Relax Cotty there is no 'n' in the word.
At 05:26 AM 10/01/2005 , you wrote:
A 'porro' mirror no less!
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympuse300/
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think the slow AF of the *ist D is related to a rather weak focus motor,
not the optics. It seems to be equally slow no matter what lens is used.
The
AF of the MZ-S is much better - it works so fast, that the camera actually
moves in my hand when I press the
I see. To me flashes are basically a necessary evil (although I do
believe, I may own 10-20 flashes, most of which are from Pentax or Metz),
except perhaps in the studio. I guess I got most of these flashes long
before CCD's and 3200 ISO by pushing a button was invented.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL
MZ/ZX bodies have weaker AF motor than the Z-1/Z-1p
for the same reason.
Does this go for the MZ-S as well
Anyway, the PZ-1p has nice and quite fast AF.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Alan Chan [mailto:[EMAIL
...ups -this was the wrong subject I guess.
Doesn't this Olympus remind us of the old Olympus PEN F?
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 10. januar 2005 20:17
Til:
--- Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this go for the MZ-S as well
Anyway, the PZ-1p has nice and quite fast AF.
I believe so because the MZ-S doesn't have the space to fit a bigger and more
powerful motor.
=
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
There used to be Edwal anti fogging chemicals sold, I never used them so
I couldn't vouch for their capabilities.
Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
All the old paper I picked up has a gray fog to it.
Is there any chemical to minimize that?
TIA,
Collin
You impress at a distance, but you impact a life
Just wondering if others making calendars have an idea as to their production
costs?
I've been doing calendars for the last several years.
I use calendar blanks from Photographers Edge @ around $5.50/each depending on
volume. I then print 13 4X6 prints on my Epson Stylus Photo @ around
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 20:05:11 -0500, Herb Chong wrote:
i read about this slow or useless AF performance in low light on the *istD
comment and i wonder every time what is really going on. i shoot a lot of
waterfall shots with a 10 stop ND filter mounted. that gives me typically 8
second exposures at
Talked to the guy at Pentax Canada. He had me do a reset on the custom
functions and the autofocus is working again. Kooky. He said he
had experienced this happening on the *ist-D as well.
Damn computers !!!
--
Fred Widall,
On Sunday 09 January 2005 11:50, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Too much information here, Cowfish Billy ;-)) Some of us just want to see
the photos, not play with new technology - RSS, livejournal, consolidation
of feeds, interlinking websites - from what I can see and understand, none
of that adds
Monday, January 10, 2005, 1:40:41 AM, Geheim wrote:
G The comments so far do not surprise me much. It was just an idea I had
G :) I'm hoping someone that has used one of these zooms will chime in
G in the next few days.
Hi Chad, you can search the archives of the list (www.pdml.net) and
find
We use a template from www.mycustomcalendars.com which has been
heavily modified (I can't tolerate their plain Times font, and we must
change the language, and all the holidays, etc.) and then we add
artwork to each month, adding in the copyright and credits, and print
it on A4. When printed, we
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A 'porro' mirror no less!
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympuse300/
Yes, it says there's a porro mirror, but I can't imagine where it is or
how they're using it: There's a conventional swinging mirror that has to
move out of the way for each shot (although is
I would like to know which setting turns off the AF. Perhaps linking AF to
AE?
Or perhaps release while charging set to OFF, or release w/o CF set to
ON ???
My advice: Find the three basic settings (1-2-3 for *ist D) which you never
change - like Normal-Hi Speed-Depth.
Set the main MENU to
Jerome Reyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've some good news to share, but given this is a photo list and all, I'll
let the photos tell it: http://tinyurl.com/6h6jp
Something odd going on here, Jerome? All I get at that URL is a template
page with no photos. All your other pages work fine.
--
On Jan 10, 2005, at 10:47 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Yes, it says there's a porro mirror, but I can't imagine where it is or
how they're using it: There's a conventional swinging mirror that has
to
move out of the way for each shot (although is swings sideways, rather
than upward). Odd.
The name
No real help here, Mark, but that URL works just fine for me!
1.25 Ghz PowerMac MDD G4, OS 10.2.8, Netscape 7.2, 1.2 Gb RAM
keith whaley
Mark Roberts wrote:
Jerome Reyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've some good news to share, but given this is a photo list and all, I'll
let the photos tell it:
Monday, January 10, 2005, 5:50:46 PM, Collin wrote:
CRB All the old paper I picked up has a gray fog to it.
CRB Is there any chemical to minimize that?
Yes.
;-)
There is even a way to restore paper fogged by light. During the WWII
paper was scarce.
Unfortunately, I don't have the recipe.
Jerome Reyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've some good news to share, but given this is a photo list and all, I'll
let the photos tell it: http://tinyurl.com/6h6jp
A very lovely young lady, Jerome, congratulations. Be sure and bring her to
GFM in June.
Bill
Just received my new Sigma EF 500 DG super from BH today. Still reading
the manual and learning how to use it. All I can say so far is that the
construction is impressive. Preliminary test shots here in my office
show very good exposure accuracy (in P-TTL mode).
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and
I'm doing calendars on legal size paper (8.5 x 14 inches) folded and
stapled. Printing alone is going to cost me $19.50 Canadian per calendar
(about $16 US).
I could print them at home on an Epson Stylus color 850, but in order to
get reasonable quality on the inkjet I'd need to use glossy
On Monday 10 January 2005 13:48, Rob Studdert wrote:
FJW On 9 Jan 2005 at 11:53, Bruce Dayton wrote:
FJW
FJW I follow about the same practice as you. Along with that, I charge
FJW and put in a fresh set before each session that I would be shooting.
FJW Session could be a walkabout, a portrait
On 10 Jan 2005 at 23:35, Frits Wüthrich wrote:
I also noticed this, when my *ist D ran out of juice I put fresh
batteries in as well as downloaded the images and removed those from the card.
The camera started with the numbers of the downloaded shots again. I guess the
number gets written
Here she is:
http://www.albanogarcia.com.ar/PiletaMajo.jpg
Regards
=
Albano Garcia
Photography Graphic Design
http://www.albanogarcia.com.ar
http://www.flaneur.com.ar
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo!
I'm trying to come up with the best way to complete
a small studio lighting setup.
I have 2 120WS strobes with 32 umbrellas and stands.
I also have 2 extra stands.
I'd like to get 2 more AC slave strobes of about the same power.
I can't decide whether to go with 2 more umbrellas and holders or
get
I assume, since you are still alive, that you didn't
tell her you were going to post this? ;-)
Cool shot!
Don
-Original Message-
From: Albano Garcia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 5:00 PM
To: PDML
Subject: PAW: My girlfriend is on steroids...
Here
Rob Studdert mused:
On 10 Jan 2005 at 23:35, Frits Wüthrich wrote:
I also noticed this, when my *ist D ran out of juice I put fresh
batteries in as well as downloaded the images and removed those from the
card.
The camera started with the numbers of the downloaded shots again. I
During my learning curve in regard to Alkalines being
useless in the D, I ALMOST lost shots due to trying
to copy duplicate FNs to a folder.
Fortnately I had the sense to click NO to the
over-write warning.
Big PITA though, now I stick with Lithiums and
the problems are minimal.
Don
- Original Message -
From: Collin R Brendemuehl
Subject: OT: Fogged Paper Question
All the old paper I picked up has a gray fog to it.
Is there any chemical to minimize that?
There is, unfortunately, I don't have my chamical encyclopedia handy
at the moment.
Benzotriazol comes to mind,
Jerome - Congratulations to you both and hope you will be very happy
together!
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: Jerome Reyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 10:23 PM
Subject: GESO: december highlights
I've some good
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 00:37:29 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You starting a phone booth, (Ok kiosk), series???
Not yet. Only two of them (I think). Not enough to call a series
yet. But, I have a couple with graffiti, so it could also be part of
a burgeoning graffiti series.
Once again a post didn't seem to make it to the list
A few months ago some friends and I went into San Francisco to see the
Carnaval Festival (http://www.carnavalsf.com/), a mostly Latin American
but multi-cultural street party covering a large area of San Fancisco's
Mission District.
John, Bill, Bruce, Bob, and Francis -
Much thanks for the congratulatory words. It was a pleasure to share the
photos, and I'm glad you enjoyed.
Mark, I'm sorry that the photos didn't come up for you. Coincidentally, I
remember reading a recent post of yours discussing the extent that you are
My experience with the AF of the MZ-S and the *istD tells me that the MZ-S
is far better than the digital, with any of the lens I have used on both
cameras. I find the MZ-S very quick and accurate, and able to AF in very
dim conditions and low contrast. On the other hand, using the *istD at
On 11/1/05, Jerome, discombobulated, unleashed:
Not too shabby of a deal.
I should say so! Congratulations to you both :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: OT - Olympus E-300 DSLR review posted
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A 'porro' mirror no less!
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympuse300/
Yes, it says there's a porro mirror,
Think porro prism (as in those cheap and dirty
- Original Message -
From: Albano Garcia
Subject: PAW: My girlfriend is on steroids...
I think this is Cotty's assistant, don't know about steroid use,
though she appears to be in pretty good condition
http://www.crash.net/pictures/view/117647.jpg
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Don Sanderson
Subject: Sot Box or Umbrella, which is better?
I'm trying to come up with the best way to complete
a small studio lighting setup.
I have 2 120WS strobes with 32 umbrellas and stands.
I also have 2 extra stands.
I'd like to get 2 more AC slave
On 10/1/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
I think this is Cotty's assistant, don't know about steroid use,
though she appears to be in pretty good condition
http://www.crash.net/pictures/view/117647.jpg
William Robb
Holy moly, that's me when I was younger and had hair.
Cheers,
On 10/1/05, Albano Garcia, discombobulated, unleashed:
Here she is:
http://www.albanogarcia.com.ar/PiletaMajo.jpg
Outrageous! Well done, nice shot.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 23:53:19 -0500, Luigi de Guzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lighting's a funny thing. In situations like this, I almost don't mind the
killer contrast range (like your bw concert shots), because it lets me
pretend that the light wasn't as bad as it really was. I don't know
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:56:47 +1100, Trevor Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day Frank.
Mate, You are a bloody Aussie aren't ya?
If your not, You aught to be.
If you ever get to OZ, and talk like that. The customs bloke will just
say G'day mate. Welcome home digger
And wave you through.
Shel,
It made it the first time, just not time to comment yet. Briefly, I
like the first one - good eye contact and the peeling pole gives it a
nice sense of place. I wish it were just a touch brighter near his
eyes, maybe lighten a bit.
The second shot, I don't care for so much - mostly
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 08:32:11 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When the more popular or common browsers don't work with a site, then the
site designer has clearly not done his or her job properly. I have probs
with IE 6 - what can be more ubiquitous than IE and Netscape?
Shel
A friend just sent this link to me and I found it fascinating.
http://homepage.mac.com/demark/tsunami/1.html
Bill
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 08:16:42 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few months ago some friends and I went into San Francisco to see the
Carnaval Festival (http://www.carnavalsf.com/), a mostly Latin American
but multi-cultural street party covering a large area of San Fancisco's
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:00:02 -0800 (PST), Albano Garcia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here she is:
http://www.albanogarcia.com.ar/PiletaMajo.jpg
Ja, unt if you laff at me, I'll bent your little girlie legs like a
Cher-mann pret-zel until you cry like a little baby for your
mama! (say to
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:31:29 -0600, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this is Cotty's assistant, don't know about steroid use,
though she appears to be in pretty good condition
http://www.crash.net/pictures/view/117647.jpg
Hefting that humongo camera around, she'd pretty
Hi Bruce ...
Your comment about the brightness around the eyes made me remember
something from many months ago, that being that different browsers and
viewers sometimes render an image differently. With that in mind, I opened
the pic in PS CS, Irfan, IE 6, and MS Fax Viewer. While all the
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:51:33 +, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Holy moly, that's me when I was younger and had hair.
Well, I gotta tell ya, Cotty, maybe they ~told~ you they were giving
you steroids, but judging by those (ahem) pecs, there was another
hormone supplement in that syringe
Albano - she _will_ kill you for publishing that!
Natural distortion or worked on?
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: Albano Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 9:00 AM
Subject: PAW: My girlfriend is on
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
