Yes. ...what they all will say, in order to sell. Don't believe everything
you read in an ad!
I guess tracking describes the currently available AF functions better than
locking.
What they mean by locking is simply focus or obtain focus confirmation.
But focus confirmation just indicates that
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, it is possible that the Wal-Mart has a terminal that sends to the
lab, but it looks the same as the kiosk.
One thing with the Noritsu labs, they are most comfortable working with sRGB
files, so get used to that colourspace.
Yeah, here in
IPTC stands for International Press Telecommunications Council you can
modify this information by
using the
File-File Info menu item in Adobe Photoshop 5.5. It's probably the
same in later versions but I don't know that
for sure.
Image-Information menu item in IrfanView 3.xx brings up a file
Maybe the guy on the bike
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/pib.html
is looking at the puppy in a box http://www.jbuhler.com/html/es00-0026.html
There's defenitely somthing to be seen in that mirror.
Jens
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
I'd love to be around on the day they invent a camera you can point at the
centre forward at the beginning of a soccer game, give you focus
confirmation and then stay focused on the guy for the rest of that half. I
suppose true locking will require some kind of 3D focusing system combined
with
Hi,
Sunday, January 16, 2005, 2:11:59 AM, Shel wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/pib.html
There's a bit of a back story to this little snap. I'm sure you can find
it within the photo which was made with a 1937 Leica and collapsible 50mm
Elmar (f3.5) of the same vintage.
Very
Had to go to my archives for this:
http://photos3.flickr.com/3418918_00970a25ef_o.jpg
(just a snap, but to follow up on some other PESO PAW posted earlier
today--gues who's the guy in the mirror)
:-)
--
Juan Buhler
http://www.jbuhler.com
blog at http://www.jbuhler.com/blog
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My contribution: Milngavie.
Now that you Britons have had your fun, how about letting the REST of us know
the rest of the story.
Mullguy or Millguy :-)
Kostas (not British technically, but I take it as a compliment :-)
Hi,
Sunday, January 16, 2005, 2:11:24 AM, Graywolf wrote:
It wasn't a secret, MS bragged about it. They claimed it would help them serve
you better (with potatoes and gravy, I guess). But it continues, in XP there
are
about a hundred services running as default. Many of them can be turned
On 16/1/05, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
I handled one of the very first five Canon D1's, when they first came to
Europe (2001?) at a Canon presentation in Cork, Ireland. It had 45 focus
points. The viewfinder was totally covered with focus points - they lit up
like the neon lights of
Hi,
I just want to show a sign of life, as my last post is some time ago.
The reason is that I have to cope with some major private problems and
changes in my life. But I'm - at last - still reading the PDML ;-) and
hope to put my life in order in the next weeks.
Nevertheless - I have added a
On 15/1/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/peso/Amarylis.html
Stunning!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 15/1/05, Dave Kennedy, discombobulated, unleashed:
That's 2 comments suggesting I sell the film. Wow. I would find that
difficult making the jump from film to digital cold turkey. hmmm
You'd be surprised.
I wonder how many DSLR owners have picked up a film camera and actually
used it
Hi Peter...
Isn't this the image that needed a little touchup to get rid of the
specular highlights in the dog's eyes? Where moisture resting on his
lower lids reflected bright light reflections?
keith
Peter J. Alling wrote:
Still learning to use the *ist-D. I'm experimenting with Flash
I
It might just be dust or moisture (condensed water), due to rapidly changing
temperatures.
Perhaps some of that contact spray that radio mechanics use will solve the
problem.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: William Robb
On 16/1/05, Juan Buhler, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://photos3.flickr.com/3418918_00970a25ef_o.jpg
(just a snap, but to follow up on some other PESO PAW posted earlier
today--gues who's the guy in the mirror)
Obviously Shel.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
In A hard day's night Beatles film, Ringo is using a camera which
obviouslt is Pentax/Honeywell (dunno which one?).. and a black one
(so it is a pro camera, right? :o) with that...
This is something I've been wondering myself for quite some time now. I
even tried to take screenshots from my
On 15/1/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
We're just going to have
to disagree.
I agree.
I mean, er
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Yes ... why are you confused, and about what are you confused?
Well, with the exception of the occassional flocking at GFM, I tend to
think of the members of the list as separate entities... so initially it
seemed a bit odd (twilight zone-ish, even) that the two galleries would
overlap... and in
Hi!
DK What do I do with it?
DK Currently I have:
DK PZ-1, MZ-10 bodies.
DK 28-70/4 FA
DK 70-210/4.5-5.6 F-SMC
DK 50/1.7F
DK 28-200 FA
DK 105/2.8 Kiron Macro
DK 400/5.6 Sigma APO
DK 1.7x AF Teleconvertor
DK Manfrotto Tripod.
DK My ideas :
DK 1) Hold onto it save towards an *istD. Because I
I know we aren't supposed to mention current auctions but this one's
too good to miss. I had to check my calendar to make sure it isn't 1
April...
Anyone care to place a bid???
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=15240item=3867736019rd=1
Cheers
Brian
Hi!
J Dear gang,
Dear Jostein :).
J I would very much like to hear your opinions on the picture at the link.
J Please look at the image first, before you read on.
J http://www.oksne.net/paw/hatteras-mosaic.html
To my utter amazement - each time I tried to load this one up in my
office it came
On 16/1/05, John Celio, discombobulated, unleashed:
In A hard day's night Beatles film, Ringo is using a camera which
obviouslt is Pentax/Honeywell (dunno which one?).. and a black one
(so it is a pro camera, right? :o) with that...
This is something I've been wondering myself for quite some
So it was written:
And, just a
small point - the hippies left in 1970, many moving to Marin County to
take up the straight life. Surprisingly - or maybe not so surprising -
many of the long-haired, dope-smoking, brown-rice-and-veggie-eating, Mario
Savio following hippies I knew in 1967 are now
I have never heard it was crap. In fact, I have done a few shots with
it and it is not bad at all. The real issue is that the build quality
is that of a $100 lens (ballpark cost). It is also 1:2 unless used
with a matched closeup filter. If one is looking for a cheap, decent
macro, it is a good
On 16/1/05, Brian Walters, discombobulated, unleashed:
I know we aren't supposed to mention current auctions but this one's
too good to miss. I had to check my calendar to make sure it isn't 1
April...
Anyone care to place a bid???
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?
You know I am beginning to wonder if I would be wasting money to go to
school...I can't afford to go to someplace like UC, and the two junior
colleges out here seem to be stuck in the dark ages in so far as
photography goes.
You ought to check out Diablo Valley College, over in Pleasant Hill
I wish I'd gotten in on this thread days ago, before I had 600+ posts to
sift through.
The following opinions are based on my short time (2.2 years) working at a
camera shop.
With that in mind ...
C-41 film will die (as a marketable item).
...Processing will be too expensive to maintian.
Hi,
Magdalen College.
Or even Magdalene College. Pronounced the same, but spelled
differently.
Ahh, but is it?
In Oxford, it's Mawdlin !
My contribution: Milngavie.
I'll offer Trottiscliffe
and I'll raise you Slaithwaite
Looks like I'm done. I'll be
Hi,
Sunday, January 16, 2005, 11:06:47 AM, Brian wrote:
I know we aren't supposed to mention current auctions but this one's
too good to miss. I had to check my calendar to make sure it isn't 1
April...
Anyone care to place a bid???
I thought about doing just that ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/pib.html
There's a bit of a back story to this little snap. I'm sure you can
find
it within the photo which was made with a 1937 Leica and collapsible
50mm
Welcome back, Heiko!
I managed to spend some time visiting your site. Very interesting indeed.
Was that Venus transit your efforts entirely? Impressive! What was the
telescope?
keith whaley
Dr. Heiko Hamann wrote:
Hi,
I just want to show a sign of life, as my last post is some time ago.
The
Hi Keith,
on 16 Jan 05 you wrote in pentax.list:
Was that Venus transit your efforts entirely? Impressive! What was the
telescope?
Thanks. I don't have a professional astronomic equipment. I have used my
Russian 1000mm mirror lens - the MC MTO-11CA (see http://
www.russianoptics.com/page6.html)
Hi all,
I've been concentrating of microscopy
for a couple of years now and have not
done any normal photography. I have a
question for the '*ist D' experts. Will
the camera work without a lens attached?
In other words if I put it on a
microscope, in place of a Pentax film
body, will it
My best solution has been having a firewall.
It reports to me which application is trying to get out.
And who may be trying to get in.
Collin
You impress at a distance, but you impact a life up close. The closer the
relationship the greater the impact.
Howard Hendricks
I don't care too much for the moasic effect on the sky itself; the
uneven blocks don't really do anything for me.
But I like how the lighthouse et al look; it looks very artistic and
seems to amplify the towering effect of the lighthouse. Good work, and
keep at refining this technique :)
On
On 2005-01-16, at 11:48, Dr. Heiko Hamann wrote:
I just want to show a sign of life, as my last post is some time ago.
The reason is that I have to cope with some major private problems and
changes in my life. But I'm - at last - still reading the PDML ;-) and
hope to put my life in order in the
Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK - just so we can have the pleasure of your company some day.
Magdalen - Maudlin
Magdalene - Maudlin
Caius - Keys
Trottiscliffe - Trosley
Slaithwaite - Slowit 'Slough it'
Leicester - Lie sesster
Birmingham - Bumminem
How about Cholmondeley, then?
--
Mark
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/peso/Amarylis.html
Tech data:
Bellows Takumar 100mm f/4 at f/16 mounted to the Bellows A.
Pentax istD, 200iso, 8 seconds, NR on.
I tweaked the RAW file very slightly, cropped the tiniest bit,
applied a gentle unsharp mask,
Just discovered Action Central, a site for downloading Photoshop actions.
Maybe there's something here for you ...
http://www.atncentral.com/download.htm
Shel
I was a little xfused for a moment, but I get it now!
Don
-Original Message-
From: Bob W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 5:52 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Speaking of Pentax M42 bodies.
Hi,
Sunday, January 16, 2005, 11:06:47 AM,
Wendy said a lot more than this:-)
Photo finishing here is
just getting worse!
I had just prepared an 8x10 for an agility friend. It was a photo I had
taken in September of Jake, a Belgian Tervuren. Only a month later, the
dog died.
I don't consider
Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Spyware takes advantage of documented hooks into the Browser and OS
that Microsoft designed in for their own use
Spyware doesn't necessarily have to even do that; spyware functions can
be deliberately built in to commercial software. Turbo Tax, IIRC,
Why? Do you find that shooting digital affords better final quality
prints? Are most of your photos destined for the web or email in some way,
bypassing prints in most instances? If you make prints, how large are
they? (Did you send my high quality BW print yet?) Do you prefer digital
because
Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been concentrating of microscopy for a couple of years now
and have not done any normal photography. I have a question for
the '*ist D' experts. Will the camera work without a lens attached?
In other words if I put it on a microscope, in place of a
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 05:40:46 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Peter ...
Holy Crap! I went to the File Info (IPTC) in PS and there is a LOT of
information requested. I'm sure that not all is required, but there's no
way I'm going to start adding all that information (or
Have you considered one of the online services like EZ Prints?
-Original Message-
From: wendy beard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 3:03 PM
To: pentax-discuss
Subject: photo printing rant
Photo finishing here is just getting worse!
I had just prepared an 8x10
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
(I've always disliked processing film - B-O-R-I-N-G), or don't want to
spend the time traveling to and from the lab to get the film processed.
Don't you do mail order in the US? I get a 36exp-colour film
processed, printed twice at 6x4 and a CD for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kostas Kavoussanakis mused:
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Cotty wrote:
On 15/1/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Magdalen College.
Or even Magdalene College. Pronounced the same, but spelled differently.
Ahh, but is it?
In Oxford, it's Mawdlin !
My contribution:
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Magdalen College.
Or even Magdalene College. Pronounced the same, but spelled
differently.
Ahh, but is it?
In Oxford, it's Mawdlin !
My contribution: Milngavie.
I'll offer Trottiscliffe
and I'll raise you Slaithwaite
Looks like I'm
I wouldn't be sure the D1 would focus/refocus at the same object every time!
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 16. januar 2005 14:22
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: *istD AF
I'd NEVER send my film out to be processed by mail order! While I find
processing film to be boring, my BW generally gets done right here so I
can have control, no matter how much it pains me to do it, and the local
pro labs handle my color so I can talk with them about how I want the
processing
Because if your heater stops working, you have a warranty to replace/fix it,
and if it causes a lot of damage, you can sue the manufacturer.
Because if your heater goes down, your library upstairs doesn't disappear? Along
with your tax papers...
Because I cannot hijack you heater and use it to
that's pretty much all one can do, anyway. short of switching to a different OS.
best,
mishka
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 08:03:43 -0500, Collin R Brendemuehl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My best solution has been having a firewall.
It reports to me which application is trying to get out.
And who may be
AFAIK, Bob's the normal definition of bug.
What Peter says is... basically it says a lot about the company he worked at.
best,
mishka
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 21:21:20 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a software engineer, the definition we used was that a bug that
didn't cause
I used my Leica iiif once. When I did my first shoot with the digital,
I took my 6x7 along, but it never came out of its case.
Paul
On Jan 16, 2005, at 5:56 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 15/1/05, Dave Kennedy, discombobulated, unleashed:
That's 2 comments suggesting I sell the film. Wow. I would find that
this is the reason for my original comments. i know the 1D can do this. i've
seen the photographic results.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 5:48 AM
Subject: Re: *istD AF performance (was
Hi Peter ...
Holy Crap! I went to the File Info (IPTC) in PS and there is a LOT of
information requested. I'm sure that not all is required, but there's no
way I'm going to start adding all that information (or even a good portion
of it) to every photo. That's just too much time and work. Do
- Original Message -
From: Peter J. Alling
Subject: Re: PESO: Cool Macro Photograph
Very nicely done.
Thanks Peter.
bill...
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: Cool Macro Photograph
Stunning!
Thanks Cotty.
b...
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
Subject: Re: Decisions...Decisions...
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
(I've always disliked processing film - B-O-R-I-N-G), or don't
want to
spend the time traveling to and from the lab to get the film
processed.
Don't you do
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: Decisions...Decisions...
Why? Do you find that shooting digital affords better final
quality
prints? Are most of your photos destined for the web or email in
some way,
bypassing prints in most instances? If you make prints, how
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: Decisions...Decisions...
I wonder how many DSLR owners have picked up a film camera and
actually
used it since acquiring the digital? It's not that I can't - but I
just
don't want to.
I have, when I need my 15 to act like a really wide
- Original Message -
From: Alan Chan
Subject: Re: photo printing rant
Yeah, here in Vancouver I have tried some labs and finally settled
with, you know
what, Costco in Richmond. Despite the ridiclous low price, the
digital print quality
is very good. In fact, they are more predictable
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: PESO: Cool Macro Photograph
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/peso/Amarylis.html
Amaryllis?
Yup. Did I spell it wrong?
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Bob W
Subject: Re: Fighting Spyware
But then, when my central heating goes wrong I don't have the
faintest idea what
to do. Why should computers be any different?
You got central heating over there?
WOW!!!
WW
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: PESO: Cool Macro Photograph
Very nice, Bill. I like the way you framed it. I'm guessing that
lily didn't grow in Canada vbg. How did you light it?
Paul
We bought an Amaryllis kit from Wal-Mart just around the end of
November.
Quite
- Original Message -
From: Graywolf
Subject: Re: Fighting Spyware
, in XP there are about a hundred services running as default.
I just counted.
Fifty-four running on my machine at the moment, including two that I
am actually using for something.
Norton bloats out the running processes
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Tokayer
Subject: Re: Cool Macro Photograph
Megapixel.net had this image as their photo of the month
http://www.megapixel.net/html/galleries/covers/images/ann-decamp.jpg
That one is way nicer than mine. It looks like the photographer
actually lit the
Hi,
Sunday, January 16, 2005, 3:26:49 PM, Mishka wrote:
Because if your heater stops working, you have a warranty to replace/fix it,
and if it causes a lot of damage, you can sue the manufacturer.
Same thing applies to software and computers. They are not exempt from
consumer law.
Because
Hi,
Sunday, January 16, 2005, 2:37:46 PM, Mark wrote:
Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Spyware takes advantage of documented hooks into the Browser and OS
that Microsoft designed in for their own use
Spyware doesn't necessarily have to even do that; spyware functions can
be
Hi,
Sunday, January 16, 2005, 2:44:57 PM, Mark wrote:
Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK - just so we can have the pleasure of your company some day.
Magdalen - Maudlin
Magdalene - Maudlin
Caius - Keys
Trottiscliffe - Trosley
Slaithwaite - Slowit 'Slough it'
Leicester - Lie sesster
Birmingham
Hi,
But then, when my central heating goes wrong I don't have the
faintest idea what
to do. Why should computers be any different?
You got central heating over there?
WOW!!!
WW
don't get carried away - it's just an example. Doesn't mean we
actually have it!
--
Cheers,
Bob
I've been concentrating of microscopy for a couple of years now and
have not done any normal photography. I have a question for the '*ist
D' experts. Will the camera work without a lens attached?
In other words if I put it on a microscope, in place of a Pentax film
body, will it take pictures
Hi,
Don't you do mail order in the US? I get a 36exp-colour film
processed, printed twice at 6x4 and a CD for 9.75 (around 18-20
dollars, I would say), incl. stamps and what have you. I have done
cheaper (but not as good) in the past.
Kostas
The man who recommended mail-order procecssing
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
Subject: Re: Decisions...Decisions...
Don't you do mail order in the US? I get a 36exp-colour film
processed, printed twice at 6x4 and a CD for 9.75 (around 18-20
dollars, I would say),
http://ist.uwaterloo.ca/~fwwidall/htdocs/Cameras/wunsche.html
A couple of images of the camera are available at the above URL.
I photographed it next to a 35mm film canister, a 120 film spool, and the
spool which was in it to give some idea of its size.
I found some screws with which to fix the
No, that was taken with the on camera flash. This was using the AF280T
with a softbox. No highlights to remove, also he had a slightly
different expression, this one is much more pathetic in my opinion. I
think he's getting tired of being a test subject.
Keith Whaley wrote:
Hi Peter...
On Jan 16, 2005, at 8:55 AM, mike wilson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kostas Kavoussanakis mused:
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Cotty wrote:
On 15/1/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Magdalen College.
Or even Magdalene College. Pronounced the same, but spelled
differently.
Ahh, but
Hey five bucks AU it might be worth the bid. There was a time when
Asahi didn't own rights to the
Pentax brand world wide. Pentacon did IIRC. This could be one of those
[in]famous non-Asahi Pentaxs.
Brian Walters wrote:
I know we aren't supposed to mention current auctions but this one's
too
It's a standard for use in by the Newspaper business, I doubt every
publication uses everything, most probably only use some of it, but it's
available, and standardized. I'll bet a fair amount is automagically
filled in by special software used when various editors manipulate the
images prior
I shoot a fair amount of color these days ... there's a place for digi
here, but the reasons may not be the same as for other people.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shel, I don't think digital is going to be a good choice for much of
what you do. There are
I've worked for a lot of crappy companies, and from what I've seen of
most commercial software there are a lot more.
The bottom line rules, if your lucky. If you're not then the IPO rules...
Mishka wrote:
AFAIK, Bob's the normal definition of bug.
What Peter says is... basically it says a lot
Alan Chan, at T=0612.03 :
Are you sure you want to do that? How are you going to print those tiny
letters on
the dial?
Sure. They are not just painted - rather engraved a little. There is no
problem to paint the whole dial black and then fill them with silver or
white paint.
But how to
Without even looking I can imagine Shel's response to this (grin). Most folks
who still do serious BW would respond similarly. If you shoot nothing but lab
processed 35mm color negative, then yes get a DSLR, you will never pick up a
film camera again.
Me, I can not see a digital camera
why not do C41 at home too? Its quick, cheap, easy, and wont get
mishandled. I have been doing my own for about a year now
and would do any labs again. I used to think is was hard, I was
wrong. I do 85 deg. F so all you have to do is warm up the
bottles for a few mins befor processing. Results are
I don't fill out all the boxes, but I use file info. For example,
sometimes I want to know what from what PEF file a shot was converted.
The history category of file info provides that info. And of course the
camera data box provides as much info as is available through metadata.
When shooting
- Original Message -
From: Peter J. Alling
Subject: Re: Speaking of Pentax M42 bodies.
Hey five bucks AU it might be worth the bid. There was a time when
Asahi didn't own rights to the
Pentax brand world wide. Pentacon did IIRC. This could be one of
those [in]famous non-Asahi
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Decisions...Decisions...
why not do C41 at home too? Its quick, cheap, easy, and wont get
mishandled. I have been doing my own for about a year now
and would do any labs again. I used to think is was hard, I was
wrong. I do 85
I'll see your Slaithwaite and raise you an Edinburgh.
Norm
Bob W wrote:
I'll offer Trottiscliffe
and I'll raise you Slaithwaite
Correction: I didn't explain myself clearly. you can't add info to
camera data, so I list the stop on the first pate of file info, usually
in the description box.
On Jan 16, 2005, at 12:27 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I don't fill out all the boxes, but I use file info. For example,
sometimes I
Thanks Dave,
Now all I have to do is find the money.
Don
David Wheatley wrote:
I've been concentrating of microscopy for a couple of years now and
have not done any normal photography. I have a question for the '*ist
D' experts. Will the camera work without a lens attached?
In other words if I
http://www.graywolfphoto.com/pentax/pdml-faq.html
Link posted every Sunday (if I remember).
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.13 - Release Date: 1/16/2005
There are three bottles, Developer, bleach-fix,
and stabilzer-wetting agent. The kit I have been
using is a powder kit from freestyle photo supply
and goes by the Arista brand name.
the 85 deg processing times are easy.
developer - 6.5 min (constant agitation)
bleach-fix - 10 min (intermittant
Over the past 2-3 years, I've moved all my photography to
digital cameras. Reason: I get better quality this way, and can
produce more work
80% of my photography is BW. I'm printing the best BW I've
ever done now. It is much much more facile to render BW in
Photoshop than in the darkroom.
14x9 that would be 5.5x3.5 or postcard size. The film that had that size
negative was 122. The old Kodak 3A cameras also used that size. The only place I
know that sells 122 is http://www.central-camera.com/films4classics.asp. Very
expensive, but might be worth it just to see how the camera
http://www.freestylephoto.biz/sc_prod.php?cat_id=1001pid=708
The 1 quart capacity is at least 400 square inches which is
about 8 rolls of 135-36 film.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 12:42 PM
To:
Any Pentax 135mm you replace it with will be an improvement.
[and]
It's much better than the A 2.8/135mm (4 elements) which I previously
have owned and sold.
The A 135/2.8 is indeed an exception to the above generalization.
When speaking of good 135's, I might suggest keeping an eye out for
Welcome back, Heiko. I hope that the personal problems that you referred
to will be resolved to your benefit.
Joe
This the pic?
http://george-hari.tripod.com/aharddayshelp/id23.html
Scroll down to the last shot.
Nope, the one in the movie was all black. I mean, it may not have been
actually his, since at one point it falls into a river, and I'm sure he
wouldn't want to ruin one of his own cameras. I've
1 - 100 of 202 matches
Mail list logo
