Do you know any details about this MZ-1?
--
Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ...
Thanks ...
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 2/25/2006 8:19:35 PM
Subject: Re: Capacity of SD cards for DS
A 1G card is projected capacity between 93-95 PEF files, depending on
the specific card, in my DS bodies.
Cotty wrote:
On 25/2/06, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
He reads like he is a bit of a wimp.
Artist. Same thing.
You and Hemingway would have had a lot to discuss.. 8-)
Were you filming the demo in Oxford?
m
Dario Bonazza wrote:
Ebay fun never ends. This M 2/50mm is an F2.8 because its aperture ring
was left set to 2.8 by a previous owner:
http://cgi.ebay.com/Pentax-M-SMC-50mm-lens-1-2-f2-8_W0QQitemZ7592670228QQcategoryZ4688QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
And the price...
Dario
Hoo boy! It sold for
On 26/2/06, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Were you filming the demo in Oxford?
Not today - a couple of colleagues on duty. No trouble at all.
Did Tipu Aziz on Friday in the run-up. He's an amazing bloke - virtually
a photographic memory - always says to me 'ahh yes you're the one who
On 26/2/06, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed:
Not today
I mean not yesterday.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Paul,
On my low-res monitor I had to scroll to see the whole of the image.
At one point there was an effective crop from a little above the eye-
brows to the bottom of the picture. Made it look very powerful
to my eyes.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 2/25/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A
- Original Message -
From: Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you know any details about this MZ-1?
No. But I have someone working on it!
It has been shown at an exhibition along with other prototypes.
Pål
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 16:41:33 -0500, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
I don't see it in CS2. Remember, too, that RAW is a generic term. For
Nikon you'd have to save the file as a (non-demosaiced) NEF file. For
Pentax it would be a PEF file.
Exactly, 'RAW' usually means it is pretty close to the internal
Hi Aaron,
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 16:45:17 -0500, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
What you're asking is not possible. Once a file has been saved in
another
form, like TIFF, JPEG, PSD, it cannot be reconverted back to RAW.
Just for my own curiosity, is it because of nature of the file itself
(as in, is
I'm planning a trip to the Monterey aquarium and would like advice on what
slide film to use. The only colour film I use regularly is K64 and
that's likely to
be too slow.
Suggestions will be appreciated.
Cheers,
Gautam
Aaron
I'm sorry you are taking things personally.
Accusing me of lying isn't getting you or anybody else anywhere.
I'm not even sure that I should honor your mail with an answer.
Don't bother to answer this mail, Aaron, 'cause I won't be reading it.
Here are some FACTS on the subject:
Fact:
You
Thanks Gautam. I'll look at that crop. I had considered something like
that. For now, I actually added a bit of background above his head and
at left of frame. I tended to agree with Ken that the top of the photo
was too close to being tangential to his head, which seemed a bit off.
Paul
On
Great stuff here. I like the different look if these flower macros.
New point of view.
Regards, Bob S.
On 2/25/06, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ripping off a Jock Sturges title.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/index7/06_02_summerend/index.htm
Nothing groundbreaking, but
For those interested in the annual PMA trade show, which started
today in Orlando, you can download and view the PMA Daily here:
http://www.imaginginfo.com/2006_pma.jsp
Registered attendees at PMA find one of these outside their hotel
room door every morning of the show. The one for today
Not to leave out the competition, here is the other company that
produces a PMA Daily. I note that one of their reporters predicts
Sony will show a DSLR with Carl Zeiss lenses.
http://www.photoreporter.com/
Bob
Telescope adapter. Bausch Lomb.
1 3/4 diameter tube, screws into T-mount adapter, other end is threaded.
Will probably work with other telescopes.
$15 shipped. (US). PayPal
Collin
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, Derby Chang wrote:
Ripping off a Jock Sturges title.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/index7/06_02_summerend/index.htm
Nothing groundbreaking, but flower macros are a form of meditation for me.
Spot on, that's what flower macros and pictures are to me too.
Roll on
Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 25, 2006, at 1:56 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
As I mentioned before, DXO Labs software *can* manipulate lighting,
which I take to mean brightness/contrast/highlight/shadows, and
save in
RAW format.
If so, that's the first I've heard of it. It
On Feb 26, 2006, at 6:15 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
Fact:
The write speed - 8 secs per RAW file IS slow compared to the
competition,
which have been pointed out many time by others in this forum as well.
snip
That's not lying. That's my OPINION.
When you insist again that the photographer
Dave,
Maybe some of these people paying a lot for Canon 35mm
on Eekbay should look at KEH, where Canon and Nikon
35mm SLRs are going for considerably less than Pentax
ones (except, of course, that Pentax has no competitor
to the EOS-1 series or the F4 or F5).
Rick
--- Dave Miers [EMAIL
Comparing two older printers, carts for the 2200 are about $18 CDN each, and
carts for the 7500 are about $75 CDN each. The 7500 is much cheaper to run.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: Printing myself my photos ...
Date: Sun Feb 26, 2006 2:52
16-17MB.
That's 15MB of raw data (10mpix of 12-bit data), plus a low-
quality JPEG for preview, plus all the other metadata, etc.
I don't expect compression; it might save a few MB (based
on estimates with compressed DNGs), but I'm not sure there
is enough processing power available in-camera
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
When you insist again that the photographer must pause 37 seconds after
firing off a burst (and suggest he should have a cigarette) after I have
privately conveyed to you that the real number is two seconds, what are
you doing if not lying?
Aaron, I think Jens is
On Feb 26, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Carlos Royo wrote:
Aaron, I think Jens is writing about his *ist D, and you about the DS.
Yes, I'm writing about the DS2, because it is a current camera. As far
as I know, the DL / DL2 also have the faster write speed. The D is
very old camera by digital
Hi,
Is there a maximum capacity that the istDS/DS2 can address. I seem to
recall that some cameras can only use cards up to a certain MB capacity.
Can the ist siblings address 2GB, 4GB?
Shel
Here are two shots taken with my *istDS, an A200/4 and an AF1.7 multiplier.
I was very pleasntly surprised with the results. This makes a very
compact equivalent of an autofocus 510mm on 35mm.
http://members.aol.com/rfsindg/wings.jpg
ISO 800 - f9.0 and 1/3200 (action program and
with the firmware rev 2 installed, 2G and larger cards are all compatible.
Godfrey
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Maximum Capacity Card for DS/DS2
Date: Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:39 am
Size: 198 bytes
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Hi,
Is there a maximum
If you are content to print no larger than 8.3 inches wide, the R800 at
less than 400USD is an excellent choice. And, you get the benefit of
the excellent Epson printer profiles. It uses 8 cartridges that cost
about 15USD each. Fortunately not all need to be replaced at the same time.
On
Good to know ... I don't know if I'd want a 4GB card, but 2GB is a definite
possibility.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the firmware rev 2 installed, 2G and larger cards are all compatible.
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff
Is there a maximum
Rick
Of course I had to take a gander over to KEH to see this, which is
sooo dangerous to my wallet, ahem. I should clarify that I did not
look at any Manual focus models as I'm a modern kind of guy that way.
It really is good to see the Pentax PZ-1 holding it's value so well, but
help
I suppose it depends on what you're photographing. The last time I
photographed there I used ISO 100 film, and got good results, but I didn't
photograph the kelp forest or the jellyfish exhibit, or the tanks in the
darker areas. For those you may need a faster film depending on the speed
of your
I think a point is being missed here. Any digital file can be edited!
Just because there is not a readily available cheap commercial product
for that particular file does not mean the file can not be edited by an
expert. In the old days when software was sold on floppy disks, and the
- Original Message -
From: Thibouille
Subject: Re: Printing myself my photos ...
Very interesting discussion, really.
Are the ink cartridges priced about the same for low-end and high-end ?
The cartridges for the Epson 4800 are very expensive. The thing holds 8
carts, each one
Very nice. Amazingly good detail on the 1/4 crop.
Paul
On Feb 26, 2006, at 10:55 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Here are two shots taken with my *istDS, an A200/4 and an AF1.7
multiplier.
I was very pleasntly surprised with the results. This makes a very
compact equivalent of an autofocus 510mm on
Hi graywolf,
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:37:29 -0500, graywolf wrote:
I think a point is being missed here. Any digital file can be edited!
Of course it can, I did not say otherwise ...
I am a system programmer (like you I think), and actually
reverse engineering data-formats and data-recovery
is
I'd love one of those, it looks really sweet. Aperture ring? Shutter
speed dial? Why am I suspecting there's going to be a Leica version?
I want. With a little 20mm or 12mm prime.
-Adam
Mark Erickson wrote:
The newly-announced Panasonic DMC-L1 looks like it would be the perfect
complement
On Feb 26, 2006, at 12:05 PM, Mark Erickson wrote:
The newly-announced Panasonic DMC-L1 looks like it would be the
perfect
complement to the limited lens set. too bad it doesn't have a K
mount!
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0602/06022609panasonicdmcl1.asp
--Mark
Ah, but 'tis an
The Niew D, 645D and many Optio's
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/pma2006/Pentax/
Mark Erickson wrote:
The newly-announced Panasonic DMC-L1 looks like it would be the perfect
complement to the limited lens set. too bad it doesn't have a K mount!
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0602/06022609panasonicdmcl1.asp
--Mark
Oh, there is an available K mount adaptor for 4/3rds
Interesting unmarked switch on the back on the D...
DagT
Den 26. feb. 2006 kl. 18.13 skrev Michel Carrère-Gée:
The Niew D, 645D and many Optio's
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/pma2006/Pentax/
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, Dave Miers wrote:
to see the Pentax PZ-1 holding it's value so well, but help me here, why is a
PZ-1p in the same condition rating as a PZ-1 less money?
Guess: the PZ-1 is a leftover they bought at too high a price by
*today's* standards.
Kostas
That looks to solve my biggest interface complaint with the D, which is
finding the bloody AE Lock button without looking. I'm guessing ISO is
in the FN menu (Would definitely prefer a button and in-viewfinder readout)
-Adam
DagT wrote:
Interesting unmarked switch on the back on the D...
That would be the ant-shake on-off-mode switch ;-)
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
DagT wrote:
Interesting unmarked switch on the back on the D...
DagT
Den 26. feb. 2006 kl. 18.13 skrev Michel Carrère-Gée:
The Niew D, 645D and many Optio's
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/pma2006/Pentax/
Interesting unmarked switch on the back on the D...
Yes, I noticed that too.
It uses SD cards ... the storage door is SD sized, not CF sized,
unless the camera is twice as tall as the DS. The controls look
nicely laid out ... a melding of
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, Bob Shell wrote:
Ah, but 'tis an Olympus in sheep's clothing.
Is that bad?
Kostas
Michel Carrère-Gée wrote:
The Niew D, 645D and many Optio's
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/pma2006/Pentax/
Is it me, or does the top of the grip look pretty big? also, does it
the body itself look a bit more chunky? Whatever, it's nice to see a
new body!
--
Christian
On Feb 26, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Bob Shell wrote:
The newly-announced Panasonic DMC-L1 looks like it would be the
perfect
complement to the limited lens set. too bad it doesn't have a K
mount!
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0602/06022609panasonicdmcl1.asp
Ah, but 'tis an Olympus in sheep's
On Feb 26, 2006, at 12:36 PM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
Ah, but 'tis an Olympus in sheep's clothing.
Is that bad?
No, not bad. Depends on the price of lamb, I guess.
Bob
It appears that it will not take my CF cards, and that the
two-second delay is now relegated to a function menu.
Very disappointing. That's two strikes against it.
Joe
I'd go with Provia 400F. It can be pushed up to 3.5 stops. Pushing 2 stops
would get you ISO 1600, 3 stops to 3200. Hopefully you'll be using a fairly
fast lens as well.
http://www.vividlight.com/articles/612.htm
Tom C.
From: Gautam Sarup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
Bob,
all nice catches - totally acceptable. On my monitor they appear a tad soft,
especially the full frame.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Birds w/AF1.7 and 200A
Here are two shots taken with my *istDS, an A200/4 and an
Hi Derby,
What makes you prefer the 77 over the 85
Rgds
Patrick
On 2/25/06, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrick Genovese wrote:
That's not to bad the price this dealer is asking is just a little bit
higher than that but hey this is europe and prices here tend to be a
bit higher
Heck, even the venerable old 'D, with 1.1 firmware, can use 2GB cards.
So, for that matter, can FAT. It's going above 2GB that needs FAT32.
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 08:17:55AM -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Good to know ... I don't know if I'd want a 4GB card, but 2GB is a definite
On 2006-02-26, at 19:01, Joseph Tainter wrote:
It appears that it will not take my CF cards, and that the
two-second delay is now relegated to a function menu.
You are partially right about CF cards - many current users of *istD
have them. They could do dual slots for both cards. But on the
I have no idea what you're talking about ... What's FAT and FAT32? Some
kind of formatting or card type or software?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: John Francis
Heck, even the venerable old 'D, with 1.1 firmware, can use 2GB cards.
So, for that matter, can FAT. It's going above 2GB
On Feb 26, 2006, at 10:46 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I have no idea what you're talking about ... What's FAT and FAT32?
Some
kind of formatting or card type or software?
FAT (short for FAT16) and FAT32 refer to the directory structure used
in nearly all flash media storage cards. FAT is
Yes - it's the card file format.
FAT is the file format most commonly seen on DOS or early Windows
systems, although it was adopted by several other small computers
(including, most relevantly, embedded systems such as those used in
digital cameras). It is capable of handling file systems of
Thanks Ken, that's the kind of feedback I need. I'll work on sharpness. Bob S.
On 2/26/06, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob,
all nice catches - totally acceptable. On my monitor they appear a tad soft,
especially the full frame.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
Just lucky he didn't escape the frame! Thanks, Bob S.
On 2/26/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice. Amazingly good detail on the 1/4 crop.
Paul
On Feb 26, 2006, at 10:55 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Here are two shots taken with my *istDS, an A200/4 and an AF1.7
multiplier.
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Something different.
All comments solicited, yeah, nay, and/or otherwise.
What would you do differently?
Thanks in advance
Kenneth Waller
Bob,
Were they posted with out sharpening?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Birds w/AF1.7 and 200A
Thanks Ken, that's the kind of feedback I need. I'll work on sharpness.
Bob S.
On 2/26/06, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: DagT
Subject: Re: More pics on PMA
Interesting unmarked switch on the back on the D...
Hopefully they will be selling it with a battery grip that has vertical
controls.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth Waller
Subject: PESO - Stumped
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Something different.
All comments solicited, yeah, nay, and/or otherwise.
You've been to too many Tony Sweet seminars.
William Robb
I'm not so certain about the SD cards. If the camera is the same size
as my D plus grip, the door is more than big enough for a CF card.
Either way is okay with me. But I think the size here is ambiguous.
Paul
On Feb 26, 2006, at 12:35 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Joe leaps.
On Feb 26, 2006, at 1:01 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
It appears that it will not take my CF cards, and that the
two-second delay is now relegated to a function menu.
Very disappointing. That's two strikes against it.
Joe
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:35:35 -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/pma2006/Pentax/
Interesting unmarked switch on the back on the D...
Yes, I noticed that too.
Indeed ...
It uses SD cards ... the storage door is SD sized, not CF sized,
unless the camera is twice
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 01:24:24PM -0600, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: DagT
Subject: Re: More pics on PMA
Interesting unmarked switch on the back on the D...
Hopefully they will be selling it with a battery grip that has vertical
controls.
At least
- Original Message -
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it me, or does the top of the grip look pretty big? also, does it the
body itself look a bit more chunky? Whatever, it's nice to see a new
body!
It looks very big to me. If the glass in the finder is of the same size as
On 2006-02-26, at 20:40, John Francis wrote:
On another point, I agree with Paul that the card door looks large
enough (just) to take CF cards, although I'm not sure it's large
enough for any extra width for a CF card pop-out button - perhaps
that could go above/below the CF card slot (right
On Feb 26, 2006, at 2:40 PM, Pål Jensen wrote:
It looks very big to me. If the glass in the finder is of the same
size as my other Pentaxes then it is the largest Pentax ever!
Yep, even bigger than the 67. You need all that extra room to hold
the giant buffer!
Bob
Paul wrote:
Joe leaps.
On Feb 26, 2006, at 1:01 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
It appears that it will not take my CF cards, and that the
two-second delay is now relegated to a function menu.
Very disappointing. That's two strikes against it.
Joe
--
I'll be pleased if I'm wrong. This
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 02:31:07PM -0500, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Joe leaps.
On Feb 26, 2006, at 1:01 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
It appears that it will not take my CF cards, and that the
two-second delay is now relegated to a function menu.
Very disappointing. That's two strikes against it.
- Original Message -
From: John Francis
Subject: Re: More pics on PMA
At least one poster on the dpreview forum states quite categorically
that there will be a grip accessory. I can't imagine it *not* having
vertical controls.
Nor can I, really. It's too important a feature to
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen
Subject: Re: More pics on PMA
- Original Message -
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it me, or does the top of the grip look pretty big? also, does it the
body itself look a bit more chunky? Whatever, it's nice to see a new
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: More pics on PMA
Joe leaps.
On Feb 26, 2006, at 1:01 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
It appears that it will not take my CF cards, and that the
two-second delay is now relegated to a function menu.
Very disappointing. That's two
Cory Papenfuss a écrit :
Wasting 10-15% on *every* picture for a useless JPEG is irritating.
True, but probably Pentax firmware uses this embedded JPEG data for the
image previews, and *not* the raw data (just because this way the same
algorithm can be used to display both RAW and JPEG
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But most likely still smaller than the competition.
Yes, but theres should be room enough for image stabilization...
Pål
On 2006-02-26, at 21:02, William Robb wrote:
That door does look wide enough to house two card bays.
Wide enough - yes, high enough - no :-)
--
Best regards
Sylwek
I'm ready to part with my black KX body.
$75
Works fine, but a fair amount of brassing.
Not a collectable, but a good user.
PayPal preferred. Plus shipping.
Collin
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
-- Jim
- Original Message -
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk
Subject: Re: More pics on PMA
On 2006-02-26, at 21:02, William Robb wrote:
That door does look wide enough to house two card bays.
Wide enough - yes, high enough - no :-)
I guess that would have to be one tall camera for that door
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Feb 26, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Bob Shell wrote:
The newly-announced Panasonic DMC-L1 looks like it would be the
perfect
complement to the limited lens set. too bad it doesn't have a K
mount!
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0602/06022609panasonicdmcl1.asp
Ah, but
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen
Subject: Re: More pics on PMA
But most likely still smaller than the competition.
Yes, but theres should be room enough for image stabilization...
I'm hoping that will be built in. My newfound love for super telephoto
lenses would find
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you think the 645 styled DSLR is a little derivative in design?
No. I find the K-mount DSLR a bit derivative as it could pass for a Canon...
Pål
True, but probably Pentax firmware uses this embedded JPEG data for the image
previews, and *not* the raw data (just because this way the same algorithm
can be used to display both RAW and JPEG pictures). The fact that even the
histograms seem to be based on the JPEG data is quite significant.
Nor can I, really. It's too important a feature to not have. Maybe it'll also
have an orientation sensor
Oh yeah... I'd forgotten that was something I was missing. Sure
is convenient to have.
--
*
* Cory
On 2006-02-26, at 21:11, William Robb wrote:
I guess that would have to be one tall camera for that door to pass
a CF card.
So it goes.
Judging by LCD which should be at least 2.5 this camera will be
about as big as Nikon D200, so that would be quite hefty body.
--
Best regards
Sylwek
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 12:50:12PM -0700, Joseph Tainter wrote:
Paul wrote:
Joe leaps.
On Feb 26, 2006, at 1:01 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
It appears that it will not take my CF cards, and that the
two-second delay is now relegated to a function menu.
Very disappointing. That's two
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, Joseph Tainter wrote:
I would have to add $800-$1000 to the street price to buy SD cards.
!!!
Kostas
It is a very close call, but convenience mostly. The 85 is a big lens,
and the 77 is very compact. Having a smaller front element, the 77 also
less prone to flare.
The 77 is probably a tad sharper wide open, but without direct
comparison, I couldn't tell. The slight speed difference isn't a
For anyone interested, Raw Shooter Essentials 2006
is out and still free.
http://www.pixmantec.com/index.asp
Don
I'll be a little dissapointed if the thing won't take CF cards,
but lets face it, SD cards are better on several levels, and
Pentax has only released one camera that takes CF, vs. several
that take SD, so it woildn't be too surprising if they have
dropped CF usage.
William Robb
--
I have plenty of capacity in both CF and SD cards, I have cameras and
other devices that use them both already. This new body looks very
nice to me. If it also has image stabilization built in, I couldn't
go wrong with it. The DA50-135/2.8 lens on the roadmap also looks
very appealing.
On Feb 26, 2006, at 12:15 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
The newly-announced Panasonic DMC-L1 looks like it would be the
perfect
complement to the limited lens set. too bad it doesn't have a
K mount!
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0602/06022609panasonicdmcl1.asp
Ah, but 'tis an Olympus in sheep's
New version out. Hooray, they've fixed the red bug (255,0,0 used to get
converted to green in the previous versions). And it's still free
http://www.pixmantec.com/purchase/downloads.asp
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
Umm...I guess so. But it's really the process of taking the pics that is
relaxing.
D
Jack Davis wrote:
Are the images intentional soft to convey a feeling of quiet
meditation?
Jack
--- Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ripping off a Jock Sturges title.
I expect SD prices will drop even lower.
Rationally, John, you are probably right. I just feel really
shafted that Pentax treats D buyers this way.
I'll probably have calmed down by the time the camera appears.
But it had better have image stabilization. Wouldn't that be
cool with your
On Feb 26, 2006, at 11:13, Michel Carrère-Gée wrote:
The Niew D, 645D and many Optio's
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/pma2006/Pentax/
Amusing, too, that the photos are all taken with the Canon 30D!
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minneapolis, MN
I shot a juggling show on stage last night for about 2.5 hours, and
some other juggling competitions in a gym today.
I have the same problem every time I do a long shoot. In order to
concentrate on what's going on through the viewfinder, I have to
close my left eye. No way around
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter
Subject: Re: More pics on PMA
Bill, don't you feel that Pentax has shafted those of us who bought the D
(and subsequently bought CF cards)?
Thats much too strong a word.
Who I really feel shafted by is SanDisk, who dinged me over 400
1 - 100 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
